Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r378-smll-171683810700065.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m18, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r378-smll-171683810700065
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 820K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 65K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.6K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 50K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.4K Apr 23 07:56 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 22K Apr 23 07:56 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K May 19 07:33 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K May 19 19:18 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.7K Apr 12 19:23 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 46K Apr 12 19:23 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Apr 12 19:22 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 93K Apr 12 19:22 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K Apr 23 07:56 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Apr 23 07:56 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 450K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m18-CTLCardinality-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m18-CTLCardinality-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m18-CTLCardinality-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m18-CTLCardinality-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m18-CTLCardinality-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m18-CTLCardinality-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m18-CTLCardinality-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m18-CTLCardinality-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m18-CTLCardinality-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m18-CTLCardinality-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m18-CTLCardinality-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m18-CTLCardinality-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m18-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m18-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m18-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m18-CTLCardinality-2023-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716896991184

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m18
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-28 11:49:53] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-28 11:49:53] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-28 11:49:54] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 350 ms
[2024-05-28 11:49:54] [INFO ] Transformed 1295 places.
[2024-05-28 11:49:54] [INFO ] Transformed 749 transitions.
[2024-05-28 11:49:54] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 1295 places and 749 transitions and 2996 arcs in 613 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 36 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 1036 places in 20 ms
Reduce places removed 1036 places and 0 transitions.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m18-CTLCardinality-2024-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m18-CTLCardinality-2024-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m18-CTLCardinality-2024-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m18-CTLCardinality-2024-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m18-CTLCardinality-2024-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m18-CTLCardinality-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 9 out of 259 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 259/259 places, 749/749 transitions.
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 224 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 224 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 240 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 243 transition count 525
Discarding 58 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 58 rule applications. Total rules 298 place count 185 transition count 239
Iterating global reduction 1 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 356 place count 185 transition count 239
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 362 place count 185 transition count 233
Discarding 39 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 39 rule applications. Total rules 401 place count 146 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 2 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 440 place count 146 transition count 194
Ensure Unique test removed 15 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 15 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 455 place count 146 transition count 179
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 475 place count 126 transition count 159
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 495 place count 126 transition count 159
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 505 place count 126 transition count 149
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 511 place count 120 transition count 141
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 517 place count 120 transition count 141
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 523 place count 114 transition count 135
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 529 place count 114 transition count 135
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 532 place count 111 transition count 131
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 535 place count 111 transition count 131
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 536 place count 111 transition count 130
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 538 place count 109 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 540 place count 109 transition count 128
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 541 place count 108 transition count 127
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 542 place count 108 transition count 127
Applied a total of 542 rules in 200 ms. Remains 108 /259 variables (removed 151) and now considering 127/749 (removed 622) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 127 rows 108 cols
[2024-05-28 11:49:54] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 24 ms
[2024-05-28 11:49:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 442 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 11:49:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 11:49:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 51 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-28 11:49:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 586 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1116 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 126 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 11:49:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 11:49:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 51 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 3/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/107 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
[2024-05-28 11:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 129 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 11:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 87 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 2/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 127/234 variables, 107/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 51/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
[2024-05-28 11:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 53 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 11:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 95 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 2/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/235 variables, 1/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/235 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 235/235 variables, and 168 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved in 13788 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 108/108 constraints, ReadFeed: 51/51 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 126/126 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 3/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/107 variables, 1/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 3/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 127/234 variables, 107/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 51/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 116/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/235 variables, 1/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 10/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/235 variables, 0/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 235/235 variables, and 294 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved in 17104 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 108/108 constraints, ReadFeed: 51/51 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 126/126 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 31525ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 31561ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 108/259 places, 127/749 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 32919 ms. Remains : 108/259 places, 127/749 transitions.
Support contains 9 out of 108 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-28 11:50:27] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 3 formulas.
[2024-05-28 11:50:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 54 ms
[2024-05-28 11:50:27] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 2 formulas.
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m18-CTLCardinality-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m18-CTLCardinality-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m18-CTLCardinality-2024-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m18-CTLCardinality-2024-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m18-CTLCardinality-2024-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-28 11:50:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2024-05-28 11:50:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 127 transitions.
Support contains 6 out of 108 places (down from 9) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8953 resets) in 2815 ms. (14 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (4190 resets) in 733 ms. (54 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (4096 resets) in 125 ms. (317 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (4054 resets) in 182 ms. (218 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (4189 resets) in 172 ms. (231 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (4135 resets) in 146 ms. (272 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (4140 resets) in 130 ms. (305 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 349013 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=116 ) properties seen :0 out of 6
Probabilistic random walk after 349013 steps, saw 152580 distinct states, run finished after 3013 ms. (steps per millisecond=115 ) properties seen :0
[2024-05-28 11:50:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 11:50:32] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 51 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 54/60 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 8/68 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp0 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp1 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp2 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp4 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 22/90 variables, 3/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 2 unsolved
[2024-05-28 11:50:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 11:50:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 2/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 113/203 variables, 90/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 2 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 37/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 0/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 2 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp3 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp5 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 235/235 variables, and 152 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 6 solved, 0 unsolved in 314 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 108/108 constraints, ReadFeed: 37/51 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 328ms problems are : Problem set: 6 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 6 atomic propositions for a total of 3 simplifications.
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m18-CTLCardinality-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-28 11:50:32] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2024-05-28 11:50:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m18-CTLCardinality-2024-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-28 11:50:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-28 11:50:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 127 transitions.
Computed a total of 25 stabilizing places and 32 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 346 edges and 108 vertex of which 106 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.5 ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 127/127 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 107 transition count 126
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 99 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 99 transition count 116
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 99 transition count 112
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 93 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 93 transition count 106
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 93 transition count 103
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 89 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 89 transition count 97
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 89 transition count 95
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 86 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 86 transition count 92
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 83 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 83 transition count 89
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 83 transition count 88
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 81 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 81 transition count 86
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 80 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 80 transition count 85
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 79 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 79 transition count 83
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 78 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 78 transition count 82
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 77 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 77 transition count 81
Applied a total of 72 rules in 28 ms. Remains 77 /108 variables (removed 31) and now considering 81/127 (removed 46) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 77 cols
[2024-05-28 11:50:32] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 5 ms
[2024-05-28 11:50:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 107 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 11:50:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 11:50:32] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 32 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-28 11:50:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 181 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 292 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 80 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 11:50:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 11:50:33] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 32 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 3/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/77 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
[2024-05-28 11:50:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 11:50:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 2/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 81/158 variables, 77/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 32/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
[2024-05-28 11:50:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 63 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/158 variables, 1/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/158 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 158/158 variables, and 117 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 4599 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 77/77 constraints, ReadFeed: 32/32 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 3/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/77 variables, 1/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 2/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 81/158 variables, 77/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 32/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 80/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/158 variables, 0/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 158/158 variables, and 197 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 3813 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 77/77 constraints, ReadFeed: 32/32 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 8513ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8515ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 77/108 places, 81/127 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8837 ms. Remains : 77/108 places, 81/127 transitions.
[2024-05-28 11:50:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-28 11:50:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-28 11:50:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 81 transitions.
[2024-05-28 11:50:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-28 11:50:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-28 11:50:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13504023401733084802.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 11:50:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5655503838487053422.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13504023401733084802.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5655503838487053422.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.99172e+09,7.12576,150948,2,11856,5,640406,6,0,389,407411,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(FALSE)
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(FALSE))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 0,0,7.1286,150948,1,0,6,640406,7,1,519,407411,1
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m18-CTLCardinality-2024-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 127/127 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 107 transition count 126
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 99 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 99 transition count 116
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 99 transition count 112
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 93 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 93 transition count 106
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 93 transition count 103
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 89 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 89 transition count 97
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 89 transition count 95
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 86 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 86 transition count 92
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 83 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 83 transition count 89
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 83 transition count 88
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 81 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 81 transition count 86
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 80 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 80 transition count 85
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 79 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 79 transition count 83
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 78 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 78 transition count 82
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 77 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 77 transition count 81
Applied a total of 72 rules in 30 ms. Remains 77 /108 variables (removed 31) and now considering 81/127 (removed 46) transitions.
[2024-05-28 11:50:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 11:50:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 98 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 11:50:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 11:50:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 32 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-28 11:50:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 206 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 306 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 80 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 11:50:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 11:50:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 32 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 3/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/77 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
[2024-05-28 11:50:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 11:50:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 2/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 81/158 variables, 77/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 32/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
[2024-05-28 11:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 63 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/158 variables, 1/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/158 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 158/158 variables, and 117 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 5382 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 77/77 constraints, ReadFeed: 32/32 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 3/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/77 variables, 1/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 2/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 81/158 variables, 77/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 32/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 80/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/158 variables, 0/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 158/158 variables, and 197 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 5027 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 77/77 constraints, ReadFeed: 32/32 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 10516ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 10518ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 77/108 places, 81/127 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 10855 ms. Remains : 77/108 places, 81/127 transitions.
[2024-05-28 11:50:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-28 11:50:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-28 11:50:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 81 transitions.
[2024-05-28 11:50:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-28 11:50:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-28 11:50:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8438409714534320775.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 11:50:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4503535485953151131.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8438409714534320775.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4503535485953151131.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.99172e+09,8.42436,150684,2,11856,5,640406,6,0,389,407411,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AX(FALSE))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(!(FALSE))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t52, t59, t60, t61, t62, t63, t64, t65, t66, t69, t70, t73, t74, t76, t77, t78, t79, t80, In...250
(forward)formula 0,0,11.3982,150684,1,0,188,640406,183,76,2683,407411,214
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m18-CTLCardinality-2024-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 127/127 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 107 transition count 126
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 99 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 99 transition count 116
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 99 transition count 112
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 93 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 93 transition count 106
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 93 transition count 103
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 89 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 89 transition count 97
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 89 transition count 95
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 86 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 86 transition count 92
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 83 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 83 transition count 89
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 83 transition count 88
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 81 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 81 transition count 86
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 80 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 80 transition count 85
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 79 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 79 transition count 83
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 78 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 78 transition count 82
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 77 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 77 transition count 81
Applied a total of 72 rules in 19 ms. Remains 77 /108 variables (removed 31) and now considering 81/127 (removed 46) transitions.
[2024-05-28 11:51:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 11:51:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 78 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 11:51:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 11:51:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 32 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-28 11:51:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 291 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 376 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 80 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 11:51:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 11:51:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 32 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 3/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/77 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
[2024-05-28 11:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 11:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 2/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 81/158 variables, 77/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 32/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
[2024-05-28 11:51:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 64 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/158 variables, 1/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/158 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 158/158 variables, and 117 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 4967 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 77/77 constraints, ReadFeed: 32/32 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 3/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/77 variables, 1/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 2/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 81/158 variables, 77/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 32/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 80/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/158 variables, 0/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 158/158 variables, and 197 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 5003 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 77/77 constraints, ReadFeed: 32/32 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 10058ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 10060ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 77/108 places, 81/127 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 10456 ms. Remains : 77/108 places, 81/127 transitions.
[2024-05-28 11:51:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-28 11:51:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-28 11:51:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 81 transitions.
[2024-05-28 11:51:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-28 11:51:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-28 11:51:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1041072874047056627.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 11:51:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7741055898741353443.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1041072874047056627.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7741055898741353443.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.99172e+09,7.74026,149948,2,11856,5,640406,6,0,389,407411,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AX(FALSE))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(FALSE))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 0,0,8.04891,149948,1,0,6,640406,7,1,832,407411,1
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m18-CTLCardinality-2024-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2024-05-28 11:51:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-28 11:51:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Total runtime 96192 ms.

BK_STOP 1716897089862

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m18"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m18, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r378-smll-171683810700065"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m18.tgz
mv SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m18 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;