Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r356-tall-171683762200962.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldRVt-PT-010A, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r356-tall-171683762200962
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 516K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.8K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 60K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.6K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 40K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K Apr 23 07:55 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K Apr 23 07:55 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K Apr 23 07:55 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Apr 23 07:55 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Apr 11 22:56 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 197K Apr 11 22:56 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K Apr 11 22:50 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 53K Apr 11 22:50 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Apr 23 07:55 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K Apr 23 07:55 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2023-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1717076747181

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldRVt-PT-010A
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-30 13:45:48] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-30 13:45:48] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-30 13:45:48] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 54 ms
[2024-05-30 13:45:48] [INFO ] Transformed 83 places.
[2024-05-30 13:45:48] [INFO ] Transformed 83 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:45:48] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-30 13:45:48] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 83 places and 83 transitions and 346 arcs in 144 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 12 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 1 transitions.
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 72 out of 83 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 83/83 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 83 /83 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 82 rows 83 cols
[2024-05-30 13:45:48] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 5 ms
[2024-05-30 13:45:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 164 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 13:45:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 13:45:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 89 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 280 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 81 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:45:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 82/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/83 variables, 41/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 1/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 82/165 variables, 83/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/165 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 165/165 variables, and 207 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved in 1453 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 83/83 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 83/83 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 82/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/83 variables, 41/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 1/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 82/165 variables, 83/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 81/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/165 variables, 0/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 165/165 variables, and 288 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved in 1400 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 83/83 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 83/83 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2906ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2926ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3241 ms. Remains : 83/83 places, 82/82 transitions.
Support contains 72 out of 83 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-30 13:45:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2024-05-30 13:45:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-30 13:45:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 57 to 52
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1525 ms. (26 steps per ms) remains 2/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 129 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 102 ms. (388 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
[2024-05-30 13:45:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp32 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp53 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 11/165 variables, and 13 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved in 22 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 11/83 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/41 constraints, State Equation: 0/83 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 28ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 15 simplifications.
[2024-05-30 13:45:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 13:45:52] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-30 13:45:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 13:45:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
Support contains 66 out of 83 places (down from 68) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 83/83 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 83 /83 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:45:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 13:45:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 13:45:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 13:45:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 65 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 139 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 81 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:45:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 82/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/83 variables, 41/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 1/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 82/165 variables, 83/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/165 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 165/165 variables, and 207 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved in 1141 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 83/83 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 83/83 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 82/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/83 variables, 41/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 1/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 82/165 variables, 83/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 81/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/165 variables, 0/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 165/165 variables, and 288 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved in 1192 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 83/83 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 83/83 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2353ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2354ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2498 ms. Remains : 83/83 places, 82/82 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:45:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 13:45:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-30 13:45:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:45:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 13:45:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 13:45:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17845668028672203385.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 13:45:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17533957819021899422.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17845668028672203385.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17533957819021899422.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.19902e+12,0.039321,4516,2,206,5,4387,6,0,416,5565,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG((((p62==1)&&(p65==1)) * (EG(((p15==1)||((p22==1)&&(p25==1)))) + EX(AG((p65==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),(((p62==1)&&(p65==1)) * (EG(((p15==1)||((p22==1)&&(p25==1)))) + EX(!(E(TRUE U !((p65==1)))...170
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.076324,5560,1,0,11,8805,29,3,2407,5565,15
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2024-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 83/83 places, 82/82 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 80 transition count 80
Applied a total of 3 rules in 19 ms. Remains 80 /83 variables (removed 3) and now considering 80/82 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 80 cols
[2024-05-30 13:45:55] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-30 13:45:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 83 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 13:45:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 13:45:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 129 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 215 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-30 13:45:55] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 79 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:45:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 80/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 40/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 80/160 variables, 80/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/160 variables, 0/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 160/160 variables, and 200 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 888 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 80/80 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, State Equation: 80/80 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 80/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 40/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 80/160 variables, 80/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 79/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/160 variables, 0/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 160/160 variables, and 279 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 875 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 80/80 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, State Equation: 80/80 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1788ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1789ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 80/83 places, 80/82 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2030 ms. Remains : 80/83 places, 80/82 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:45:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 13:45:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 13:45:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 80 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:45:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 13:45:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 13:45:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17685178225866291222.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 13:45:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2543636401411550043.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17685178225866291222.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2543636401411550043.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.09951e+12,0.024097,4544,2,121,5,4177,6,0,403,5366,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((!(A((p39==1) U E((p61==1) U (p3==1)))) + (p13==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((p13==0))) * !(EG(!(E((p61==1) U (p3==1)))))) * !(E(!(E((p61==1) U (p3==1))) U (!((p39==...198
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 77/0/3
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,0.066118,6128,1,0,17,13182,28,10,2213,10782,16
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2024-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 83/83 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 83 /83 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 82 rows 83 cols
[2024-05-30 13:45:57] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-30 13:45:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 13:45:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 13:45:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 71 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 123 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 81 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:45:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 82/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/83 variables, 41/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 1/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 82/165 variables, 83/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/165 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 165/165 variables, and 207 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved in 1149 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 83/83 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 83/83 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 82/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/83 variables, 41/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 1/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 82/165 variables, 83/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 81/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/165 variables, 0/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 165/165 variables, and 288 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved in 1205 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 83/83 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 83/83 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2368ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2369ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2496 ms. Remains : 83/83 places, 82/82 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:46:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:46:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11366119493579865056.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5399373919375911880.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11366119493579865056.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5399373919375911880.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.19902e+12,0.028332,4588,2,206,5,4387,6,0,416,5565,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((AX(AX((((p72==1)&&(p74==1))&&(p79==1)))) * AG(((((AF((p43==0)) * (((p44==0)||(p45==0))||((p48==0)||(p61==0)))) + (((p64==1)&&(p66==1)...207
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(EX(!(!(EX(!((((p72==1)&&(p74==1))&&(p79==1)))))))) * !(E(TRUE U !(((((!(EG(!((p43==0)))) * (((p4...282
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.085183,6436,1,0,17,13594,31,7,2501,11490,16
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2024-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 83/83 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 83 /83 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:46:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 13:46:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 13:46:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 13:46:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 65 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 111 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 81 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:46:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 82/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/83 variables, 41/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 1/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 82/165 variables, 83/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/165 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 165/165 variables, and 207 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved in 1181 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 83/83 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 83/83 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 82/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/83 variables, 41/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 1/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 82/165 variables, 83/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 81/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/165 variables, 0/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 165/165 variables, and 288 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved in 1244 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 83/83 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 83/83 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2437ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2438ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2553 ms. Remains : 83/83 places, 82/82 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:46:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:46:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability967548832109967068.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5503958954080386411.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability967548832109967068.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5503958954080386411.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.19902e+12,0.027361,4584,2,206,5,4387,6,0,416,5565,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(E(AX((((p47==1)||(((p8==1)&&(p10==1))&&(p15==1)))||(p13!=1))) U AX(EX((p81==1)))) U ((((p3==1)&&(p12==1))&&(p18==1)) + AF(!(((((p43==1...251
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(E(!(EX(!((((p47==1)||(((p8==1)&&(p10==1))&&(p15==1)))||(p13!=1))))) U !(EX(!(EX((p81==1)))))) U ((...351
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.446425,25844,1,0,52,83615,33,32,2429,197533,44
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2024-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 83/83 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 83 /83 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:46:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 13:46:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 13:46:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 13:46:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 55 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 100 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 81 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:46:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 82/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/83 variables, 41/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 1/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 82/165 variables, 83/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/165 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 165/165 variables, and 207 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved in 1143 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 83/83 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 83/83 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 82/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/83 variables, 41/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 1/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 82/165 variables, 83/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 81/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/165 variables, 0/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 165/165 variables, and 288 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved in 1190 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 83/83 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 83/83 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2352ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2353ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2456 ms. Remains : 83/83 places, 82/82 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:46:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:46:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2874178948428410349.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17152369439071399944.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2874178948428410349.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17152369439071399944.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.19902e+12,0.026663,4584,2,206,5,4387,6,0,416,5565,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(((((p11==1) * AF((((p51==0)||(p60==0))||(p66==0)))) + ((A(AG((((p67==1)&&(p76==1))&&(p82==1))) U AG((p55==1))) * ((((p35==1)&&(p11==1...550
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!(((((p11==1) * !(EG(!((((p51==0)||(p60==0))||(p66==0)))))) + ((!((E(!(!(E(TRUE U !((p55==1))))) U (...742
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.068403,5904,1,0,13,9712,29,4,2439,5601,15
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2024-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 83/83 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 83 /83 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:46:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 13:46:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 13:46:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 13:46:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 64 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 110 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 81 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:46:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 82/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/83 variables, 41/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 1/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 82/165 variables, 83/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/165 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 165/165 variables, and 207 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved in 1167 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 83/83 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 83/83 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 82/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/83 variables, 41/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 1/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 82/165 variables, 83/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 81/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/165 variables, 0/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 165/165 variables, and 288 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved in 1192 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 83/83 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 83/83 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2375ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2376ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2490 ms. Remains : 83/83 places, 82/82 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:46:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:46:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2745082381803847359.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12313695569737329371.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2745082381803847359.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12313695569737329371.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.19902e+12,0.031011,4584,2,206,5,4387,6,0,416,5565,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EF(EX(((AX((((p4==1)&&(p5==1))&&(p8==1))) * (p60==1)) * ((p61==1)&&(p64==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((EY(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE)) * ((p61==1)&&(p64==1))) * (p60==1)) * !(EX(!((((p4==1)&&(p5==1))&&(p8==1))))))] != F...159
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.055616,4848,1,0,6,7522,11,0,2111,5565,4
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2024-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 83/83 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 83 /83 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:46:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 13:46:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 13:46:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 13:46:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 65 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 107 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 81 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:46:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 82/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/83 variables, 41/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 1/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 82/165 variables, 83/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/165 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 165/165 variables, and 207 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved in 1156 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 83/83 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 83/83 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 82/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/83 variables, 41/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 1/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 82/165 variables, 83/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 81/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/165 variables, 0/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 165/165 variables, and 288 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved in 1175 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 83/83 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 83/83 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2346ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2347ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2459 ms. Remains : 83/83 places, 82/82 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:46:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:46:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4576394040802916341.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13242820842502087207.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4576394040802916341.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13242820842502087207.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.19902e+12,0.02762,4584,2,206,5,4387,6,0,416,5565,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E(EX(!(E((((p8==1)&&(p10==1))&&(p15==1)) U (((p4==1)&&(p5==1))&&(p8==1))))) U (((((p75==1)&&(p3==1))&&((p12==1)&&(p18==1))) + ((((p49==...476
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((FwdU(Init,EX(!(E((((p8==1)&&(p10==1))&&(p15==1)) U (((p4==1)&&(p5==1))&&(p8==1)))))) * ((((p75==1)&&(p3==1)...1091
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 74/8/8
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 78/0/4
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 71/19/11
(forward)formula 0,0,0.115431,7488,1,0,28,18541,63,11,2716,17639,30
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2024-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 83/83 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 83 /83 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:46:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 13:46:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 13:46:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 13:46:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 62 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 111 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 81 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:46:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 82/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/83 variables, 41/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 1/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 82/165 variables, 83/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/165 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 165/165 variables, and 207 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved in 1340 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 83/83 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 83/83 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 82/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/83 variables, 41/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 1/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 82/165 variables, 83/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 81/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/165 variables, 0/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 165/165 variables, and 288 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved in 1226 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 83/83 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 83/83 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2592ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2593ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2709 ms. Remains : 83/83 places, 82/82 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:46:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:46:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15705636532515416553.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15308843584243719191.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15705636532515416553.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15308843584243719191.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.19902e+12,0.02793,4584,2,206,5,4387,6,0,416,5565,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AX(EG(AF(((((p68==1)&&(p69==1))&&((p72==1)&&(p16==1)))&&((p18==1)&&(p23==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(EG(!(EG(!(((((p68==1)&&(p69==1))&&((p72==1)&&(p16==1)))&&((p18==1)&&(p23==1))))))))))...166
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,0.065122,5376,1,0,9,9078,24,2,2414,5565,9
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2024-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 83/83 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 83 /83 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:46:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 13:46:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 13:46:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 13:46:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 69 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 130 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 81 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:46:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 82/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/83 variables, 41/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 1/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 82/165 variables, 83/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/165 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 165/165 variables, and 207 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved in 1155 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 83/83 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 83/83 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 82/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/83 variables, 41/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 1/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 82/165 variables, 83/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 81/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/165 variables, 0/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 165/165 variables, and 288 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved in 1205 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 83/83 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 83/83 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2371ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2372ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2504 ms. Remains : 83/83 places, 82/82 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:46:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:46:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14689551168833488875.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7364203351404861587.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14689551168833488875.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7364203351404861587.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.19902e+12,0.027485,4588,2,206,5,4387,6,0,416,5565,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(((p5==1) + E((!(A((((p48==1)&&(p50==1))&&(p55==1)) U (p73==1))) + (p29==1)) U (p0==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * !((p5==1))) * !(E((!(!((E(!((p73==1)) U (!((((p48==1)&&(p50==1))&&(p55==1))) * !((p73==1)))) + EG(...204
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 78/0/4
(forward)formula 0,0,0.064436,5380,1,0,13,7934,31,5,2418,5565,17
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2024-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 83/83 places, 82/82 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 82 transition count 81
Applied a total of 2 rules in 6 ms. Remains 82 /83 variables (removed 1) and now considering 81/82 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 82 cols
[2024-05-30 13:46:16] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned [75]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 50 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 81/83 places, 81/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 81 /81 variables (removed 0) and now considering 81/81 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 61 ms. Remains : 81/83 places, 81/82 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:46:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 81 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:46:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7891826868802859033.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability647230896987914938.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7891826868802859033.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability647230896987914938.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.09951e+12,0.029793,4576,2,201,5,4284,6,0,407,5437,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(((p31==0) * AG(((p1==0)||(p7==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((p31==0) * !(E(TRUE U !(((p1==0)||(p7==0)))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.072999,5104,1,0,6,7727,16,0,2136,5437,5
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2024-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 83/83 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 83 /83 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 82 rows 83 cols
[2024-05-30 13:46:16] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 72 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 13:46:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 13:46:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 68 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 143 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 81 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:46:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 82/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/83 variables, 41/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 1/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 82/165 variables, 83/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/165 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 165/165 variables, and 207 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved in 1194 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 83/83 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 83/83 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 82/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/83 variables, 41/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 1/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 82/165 variables, 83/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 81/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/165 variables, 0/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 165/165 variables, and 288 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved in 1207 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 83/83 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 83/83 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2416ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2417ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2562 ms. Remains : 83/83 places, 82/82 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:46:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:46:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13432106128350399578.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7033354386294216048.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13432106128350399578.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7033354386294216048.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.19902e+12,0.029347,4592,2,206,5,4387,6,0,416,5565,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((EX(!(A((((p19==1)&&(p28==1))&&(p34==1)) U (p41==1)))) + AG(AX((p51==0)))) + (AG(((((p39==0)||(p14==0))||(p17==0))&&(((p0==0)||(p19==...197
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((EX(!(!((E(!((p41==1)) U (!((((p19==1)&&(p28==1))&&(p34==1))) * !((p41==1)))) + EG(...502
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 78/0/4
(forward)formula 0,1,0.073306,5912,1,0,16,9273,34,2,2485,5565,17
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2024-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 83/83 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 83 /83 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:46:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 13:46:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 13:46:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 13:46:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 64 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 130 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 81 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:46:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 82/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/83 variables, 41/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 1/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 82/165 variables, 83/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/165 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 165/165 variables, and 207 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved in 1136 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 83/83 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 83/83 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 82/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/83 variables, 41/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 1/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 82/165 variables, 83/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 81/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/165 variables, 0/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 165/165 variables, and 288 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved in 1221 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 83/83 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 83/83 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2366ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2367ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2502 ms. Remains : 83/83 places, 82/82 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:46:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:46:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8185755404507902531.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10476153913637986052.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8185755404507902531.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10476153913637986052.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.19902e+12,0.026924,4580,2,206,5,4387,6,0,416,5565,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(EG(EX((p55==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U EG(EX((p55==1))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,0.064514,5372,1,0,9,9038,21,0,2474,5565,10
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2024-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 83/83 places, 82/82 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 80 transition count 80
Applied a total of 3 rules in 13 ms. Remains 80 /83 variables (removed 3) and now considering 80/82 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 80 cols
[2024-05-30 13:46:22] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 13:46:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 13:46:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 60 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 105 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-30 13:46:22] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 79 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:46:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 80/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 40/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 80/160 variables, 80/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/160 variables, 0/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 160/160 variables, and 200 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 838 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 80/80 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, State Equation: 80/80 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 80/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 40/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 80/160 variables, 80/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 79/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/160 variables, 0/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 160/160 variables, and 279 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 890 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 80/80 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, State Equation: 80/80 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1736ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1737ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 80/83 places, 80/82 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1860 ms. Remains : 80/83 places, 80/82 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:46:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 80 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 4 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (0 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2024-05-30 13:46:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7160812912529072719.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16774629194399322111.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7160812912529072719.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16774629194399322111.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 83/83 places, 82/82 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 82 transition count 81
Applied a total of 2 rules in 4 ms. Remains 82 /83 variables (removed 1) and now considering 81/82 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 82 cols
[2024-05-30 13:46:23] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 115 ms returned [75]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 117 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 81/83 places, 81/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 81 /81 variables (removed 0) and now considering 81/81 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 125 ms. Remains : 81/83 places, 81/82 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:46:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 81 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:46:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality2576407817980485993.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality2233067619980698400.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality2576407817980485993.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality2233067619980698400.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...328
RANDOM walk for 10456 steps (1 resets) in 40 ms. (255 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA ShieldRVt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2024-05-30 13:46:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-30 13:46:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Total runtime 35864 ms.

BK_STOP 1717076784197

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldRVt-PT-010A"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldRVt-PT-010A, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r356-tall-171683762200962"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldRVt-PT-010A.tgz
mv ShieldRVt-PT-010A execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;