Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r356-tall-171683761800753.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldRVs-PT-004A, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r356-tall-171683761800753
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 472K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.5K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 88K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.9K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 59K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K Apr 23 07:54 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K Apr 23 07:54 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K Apr 23 07:54 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Apr 23 07:54 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.1K Apr 12 17:41 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 98K Apr 12 17:41 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.4K Apr 12 17:40 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 65K Apr 12 17:40 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Apr 23 07:54 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K Apr 23 07:54 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2023-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1717033777065

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldRVs-PT-004A
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-30 01:49:38] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-30 01:49:38] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-30 01:49:38] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 52 ms
[2024-05-30 01:49:38] [INFO ] Transformed 59 places.
[2024-05-30 01:49:38] [INFO ] Transformed 79 transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:49:38] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-30 01:49:38] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 59 places and 79 transitions and 368 arcs in 145 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 17 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2024-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 54 out of 59 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 79/79 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 79 rows 59 cols
[2024-05-30 01:49:38] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 11 ms
[2024-05-30 01:49:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 175 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 01:49:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 01:49:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 81 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 284 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:49:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:49:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 64 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 16/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:49:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:49:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 13/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:49:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 138/138 variables, and 168 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 3109 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 33/33 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 33/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:49:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 78/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:49:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:49:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:49:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:49:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/138 variables, and 253 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 4492 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints]
After SMT, in 7674ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7710ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8026 ms. Remains : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
Support contains 54 out of 59 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-30 01:49:46] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 2 formulas.
[2024-05-30 01:49:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2024-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-30 01:49:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-30 01:49:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
Support contains 53 out of 59 places (down from 54) after GAL structural reductions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 66 to 64
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (608 resets) in 1180 ms. (33 steps per ms) remains 1/64 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (134 resets) in 206 ms. (193 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2024-05-30 01:49:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp54 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 59/138 variables, and 20 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 26 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 3/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 0/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 29ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 13 simplifications.
[2024-05-30 01:49:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 01:49:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 01:49:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 79/79 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:49:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 01:49:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 01:49:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 01:49:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 72 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 116 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:49:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:49:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 16/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:49:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:49:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 13/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 138/138 variables, and 168 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 2902 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 33/33 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 33/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 78/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:49:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/138 variables, and 253 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 4497 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints]
After SMT, in 7428ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7429ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7549 ms. Remains : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:49:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-30 01:49:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 01:49:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:49:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 01:49:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 01:49:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality761284959480816414.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 01:49:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16319632635943318561.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality761284959480816414.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16319632635943318561.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.193309,11424,2,1658,5,25215,6,0,317,55142,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((EF(AG(AX((p47==1)))) + !(((p20!=1) * (A(((p56==0)||(p43==1)) U (p15==0)) + AF(((p15==0)||(p7==1))))))) U (AG(AX(EX(TRUE))) + ((EX(((p3...359
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(!(EX(TRUE))))))) + ((EX(((p39!=1)&&(!((p4==0)||(p27==1))))) * ((p4==0)||(p43...1302
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...455
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-30 01:50:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 01:50:24] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-30 01:50:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7384214204115676992.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7384214204115676992.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7384214204115676992.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7384214204115676992.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7384214204115676992.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-30 01:50:25] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-30 01:50:25] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-30 01:50:25] [INFO ] Removed a total of 81 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:50:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 40 ms
[2024-05-30 01:50:25] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 72 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2024-05-30 01:50:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18230827264057424536.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 01:50:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5697404693995056180.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18230827264057424536.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5697404693995056180.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.515648,24856,532,29,34322,372,112,140741,31,2264,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((EF(AG(AX((i3.u13.p47==1)))) + !(((i1.u5.p20!=1) * (A(((i3.u16.p56==0)||(i2.u12.p43==1)) U (i0.u4.p15==0)) + AF(((i0.u4.p15==0)||(i0.u2...514
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(!(EX(TRUE))))))) + ((EX(((i2.u11.p39!=1)&&(!((i0.u1.p4==0)||(i1.u8.p27==1)))...1797
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t31, t35, t43, t49, t52, t55, i0.t75, i0.t39, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t3, i0.u4.t...513
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 79/79 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:50:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 01:50:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 01:50:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 01:50:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 66 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 118 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:50:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 16/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 13/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 138/138 variables, and 168 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 2807 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 33/33 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 33/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:50:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 78/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:50:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:50:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:50:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:51:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:51:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:51:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/138 variables, and 253 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 4732 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints]
After SMT, in 7560ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7561ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7683 ms. Remains : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:51:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 01:51:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 01:51:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:51:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 01:51:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 01:51:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2923680071405791558.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 01:51:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1626545830257026864.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2923680071405791558.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1626545830257026864.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.203037,11528,2,1658,5,25215,6,0,317,55142,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(EF((p51==1)) U !(((AF((p45==1)) + !((((p54==1)||(p44==0))||(p1==1)))) + (AG((p51==1)) + (AF(!(((p48==0)||(p0==1)))) * (p36==1)))))) * ...222
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY((Init * !((E(!(!(((!(EG(!((p45==1)))) + !((((p54==1)||(p44==0))||(p1==1)))) + (!(E(TRUE U !((p51==1)))) + ...1184
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...455
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-30 01:51:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-30 01:51:33] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-30 01:51:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9890877367356712407.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9890877367356712407.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9890877367356712407.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9890877367356712407.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9890877367356712407.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-30 01:51:33] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-30 01:51:33] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-30 01:51:33] [INFO ] Removed a total of 81 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:51:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2024-05-30 01:51:33] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 72 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2024-05-30 01:51:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5718063333562171728.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 01:51:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2007839479143401590.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5718063333562171728.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2007839479143401590.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.596709,25404,518,29,35193,374,112,144589,31,2223,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(EF((i3.u15.p51==1)) U !(((AF((i3.u13.p45==1)) + !((((i3.u15.p54==1)||(i2.u12.p44==0))||(i0.u0.p1==1)))) + (AG((i3.u15.p51==1)) + (AF(!...316
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY((Init * !((E(!(!(((!(EG(!((i3.u13.p45==1)))) + !((((i3.u15.p54==1)||(i2.u12.p44==0))||(i0.u0.p1==1)))) + (...1583
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t31, t35, t43, t49, t52, t55, i0.t75, i0.t39, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t3, i0.u4.t...513
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 79/79 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:52:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 01:52:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 01:52:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 01:52:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 68 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 150 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:52:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:52:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:52:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 49 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:52:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:52:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:52:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:52:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:52:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:52:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:52:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:52:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:52:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:52:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:52:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:52:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:52:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:52:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 16/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:52:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:52:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:52:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:52:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:52:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:52:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:52:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:52:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:52:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:52:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:52:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:52:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:52:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:52:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 13/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:52:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:52:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:52:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 138/138 variables, and 168 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 3247 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 33/33 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 33/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:52:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 78/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:52:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:52:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:52:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:52:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:52:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:52:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/138 variables, and 253 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 4620 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints]
After SMT, in 7925ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7939ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8099 ms. Remains : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:52:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-30 01:52:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 01:52:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:52:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 01:52:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 01:52:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9840706479440592441.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 01:52:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5074373060852482346.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9840706479440592441.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5074373060852482346.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.199988,11524,2,1658,5,25215,6,0,317,55142,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX(EF(((!(A((p13==1) U (p36==0))) * AF((p21==1))) * ((p10==0)&&(p6==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(E(TRUE U ((!(!((E(!((p36==0)) U (!((p13==1)) * !((p36==0)))) + EG(!((p36==0)))))) * !(E...207
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...455
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-30 01:52:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-30 01:52:41] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-30 01:52:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14694981575675522266.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14694981575675522266.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14694981575675522266.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14694981575675522266.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14694981575675522266.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-30 01:52:41] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-30 01:52:41] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-30 01:52:41] [INFO ] Removed a total of 81 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:52:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 01:52:41] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 72 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-30 01:52:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7587397796689776866.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 01:52:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1135399083175606630.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7587397796689776866.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1135399083175606630.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.551132,24092,424,29,32623,382,105,135086,31,2330,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX(EF(((!(A((i0.u4.p13==1) U (i2.u10.p36==0))) * AF((i1.u6.p21==1))) * ((i0.u3.p10==0)&&(i0.u1.p6==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(E(TRUE U ((!(!((E(!((i2.u10.p36==0)) U (!((i0.u4.p13==1)) * !((i2.u10.p36==0)))) + EG(!...252
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t31, t35, t43, t49, t52, t55, i0.t75, i0.t39, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t3, i0.u4.t...513
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 79/79 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:53:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 01:53:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 01:53:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 01:53:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 95 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 144 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:53:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 49 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 46 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 44 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 16/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 13/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:53:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 138/138 variables, and 168 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 3278 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 33/33 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 33/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:53:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 78/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:53:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:53:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:53:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:53:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/138 variables, and 253 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 4615 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints]
After SMT, in 7918ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7922ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8071 ms. Remains : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:53:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 01:53:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 01:53:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:53:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 01:53:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 01:53:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8745410478056800456.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 01:53:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14686514769468368245.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8745410478056800456.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14686514769468368245.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.206645,11528,2,1658,5,25215,6,0,317,55142,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(E(AX(EX(AG((p42==0)))) U (p10==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(!(EX(!(EX(!(E(TRUE U !((p42==0)))))))) U (p10==0))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...455
(forward)formula 0,0,4.93568,179200,1,0,323,753818,184,135,2664,1.51828e+06,276
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2024-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 79/79 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:53:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 01:53:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 01:53:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 01:53:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 56 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 117 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:53:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:53:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 39 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 50 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 16/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:53:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:53:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 13/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:53:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 138/138 variables, and 168 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 3214 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 33/33 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 33/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:53:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 78/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:53:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:53:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:53:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:53:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:53:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/138 variables, and 253 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 4563 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints]
After SMT, in 7805ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7807ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7925 ms. Remains : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:53:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 01:53:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-30 01:53:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:53:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 01:53:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 01:53:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3224524971167378150.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 01:53:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3871295322621918046.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3224524971167378150.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3871295322621918046.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.188783,11524,2,1658,5,25215,6,0,317,55142,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((E(EF(((p0==0)||(p12==1))) U ((EG(((p27==0)||(p39==1))) * AF((p47==0))) * ((p32==0)||(p45==1)))) + AF(EG((p41==1)))) U (AF(!(AF((p55==1...209
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,(E(E(TRUE U ((p0==0)||(p12==1))) U ((EG(((p27==0)||(p39==1))) * !(EG(!((p47==0))))) * ((p32==0)||(p...344
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...455
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-30 01:54:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 01:54:02] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-30 01:54:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15481651415952515631.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15481651415952515631.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15481651415952515631.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15481651415952515631.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15481651415952515631.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-30 01:54:02] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-30 01:54:02] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-30 01:54:02] [INFO ] Removed a total of 81 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:54:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 01:54:02] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 72 labels/synchronizations in 13 ms.
[2024-05-30 01:54:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3757179412310094652.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 01:54:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1681632275645674724.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3757179412310094652.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1681632275645674724.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.545549,24088,424,29,32533,385,105,136858,31,2285,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((E(EF(((i0.u2.p0==0)||(i0.u3.p12==1))) U ((EG(((i1.u8.p27==0)||(i2.u11.p39==1))) * AF((i3.u13.p47==0))) * ((i2.u9.p32==0)||(i3.u13.p45=...289
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,(E(E(TRUE U ((i0.u2.p0==0)||(i0.u3.p12==1))) U ((EG(((i1.u8.p27==0)||(i2.u11.p39==1))) * !(EG(!((i3...438
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t31, t35, t43, t49, t52, t55, i0.t75, i0.t39, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t3, i0.u4.t...513
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 79/79 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:54:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 01:54:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 01:54:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 01:54:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 62 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 113 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:54:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:54:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 39 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:54:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 41 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:54:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 49 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:54:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:54:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:54:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:54:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:54:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:54:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:54:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:54:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:54:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:54:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:54:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 46 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:54:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:54:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 16/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:54:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:54:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:54:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:54:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:54:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:54:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:54:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:54:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:54:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:54:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 47 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:54:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:54:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:54:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:54:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 13/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:54:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:54:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:54:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 138/138 variables, and 168 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 3198 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 33/33 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 33/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:54:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 78/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:54:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:54:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:54:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:54:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:54:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/138 variables, and 253 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 4564 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints]
After SMT, in 7789ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7790ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7904 ms. Remains : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:54:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 01:54:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 01:54:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:54:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-30 01:54:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 01:54:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3053012646741801203.gal : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 01:54:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15929232168409960775.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3053012646741801203.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15929232168409960775.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.226486,11524,2,1658,5,25215,6,0,317,55142,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(EG(AX((p21==1)))) + !(E((p52==0) U EF(((p48==0)||(p39==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(FwdU((Init * !(E(TRUE U EG(!(EX(!((p21==1)))))))),(p52==0)),TRUE) * ((p48==0)||(p39==1)))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...455
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-30 01:55:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-30 01:55:10] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-30 01:55:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5138236911868044468.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5138236911868044468.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5138236911868044468.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5138236911868044468.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5138236911868044468.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-30 01:55:10] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-30 01:55:10] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-30 01:55:10] [INFO ] Removed a total of 81 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:55:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 01:55:10] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 72 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-30 01:55:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15716527964072646352.gal : 23 ms
[2024-05-30 01:55:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17466521179570627911.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15716527964072646352.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17466521179570627911.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.56603,25676,518,29,35867,403,112,145394,31,2337,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(EG(AX((i1.u6.p21==1)))) + !(E((i3.u15.p52==0) U EF(((i3.u13.p48==0)||(i2.u11.p39==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(FwdU((Init * !(E(TRUE U EG(!(EX(!((i1.u6.p21==1)))))))),(i3.u15.p52==0)),TRUE) * ((i3.u13.p48==0)||(i2.u1...175
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t31, t35, t43, t49, t52, t55, i0.t75, i0.t39, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t3, i0.u4.t...513
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 79/79 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:55:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 01:55:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 01:55:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 01:55:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 72 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 125 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:55:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 49 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 16/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:55:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:55:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:55:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:55:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:55:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:55:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:55:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:55:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:55:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:55:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:55:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 13/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:55:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:55:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:55:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 138/138 variables, and 168 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 3293 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 33/33 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 33/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 78/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:55:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:55:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 40 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:55:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:55:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:55:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/138 variables, and 253 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 4571 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints]
After SMT, in 7899ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7899ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8028 ms. Remains : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:55:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 01:55:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 01:55:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:55:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 01:55:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 01:55:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5185355827159400683.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 01:55:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16116363204066866498.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5185355827159400683.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16116363204066866498.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.196853,11524,2,1658,5,25215,6,0,317,55142,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AX(AF(((p24==0)&&(p27==1)))) + AF(AG(A((p17==1) U (p7==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(!(EX(!(!(EG(!(((p24==0)&&(p27==1)))))))))),!(!(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!((p7==1)) U (!((p17==...206
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...455
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-30 01:56:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 01:56:19] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-30 01:56:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12873422588413550403.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12873422588413550403.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12873422588413550403.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12873422588413550403.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12873422588413550403.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-30 01:56:19] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-30 01:56:19] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-30 01:56:19] [INFO ] Removed a total of 81 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:56:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-30 01:56:19] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 72 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-30 01:56:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18060808468524365837.gal : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 01:56:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3317843622478122427.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18060808468524365837.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3317843622478122427.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.518946,23824,424,29,32168,402,105,133853,31,2406,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AX(AF(((i1.u7.p24==0)&&(i1.u8.p27==1)))) + AF(AG(A((i1.u5.p17==1) U (i0.u2.p7==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(!(EX(!(!(EG(!(((i1.u7.p24==0)&&(i1.u8.p27==1)))))))))),!(!(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!((i0.u2.p...242
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t31, t35, t43, t49, t52, t55, i0.t75, i0.t39, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t3, i0.u4.t...513
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 79/79 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:56:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 01:56:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 01:56:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 01:56:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 52 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 113 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:56:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:56:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:56:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:56:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:56:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:56:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:56:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:56:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:56:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:56:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:56:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 47 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:56:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:56:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:56:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:56:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:56:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:56:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 16/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 13/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:56:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:56:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:56:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 138/138 variables, and 168 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 3409 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 33/33 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 33/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:56:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 78/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:56:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:56:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:56:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:56:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:56:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:56:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/138 variables, and 253 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 4637 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints]
After SMT, in 8072ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8074ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8191 ms. Remains : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:56:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 01:56:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 01:56:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:56:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 01:56:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 01:56:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4533414330952077017.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-30 01:56:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5265841893117770610.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4533414330952077017.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5265841893117770610.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.215842,11524,2,1658,5,25215,6,0,317,55142,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EF(!((!((((p41==1)&&(p46==1)) + AG((p45==1)))) + (p31==1)))) U !((((!((AF((p11==1)) + EF(((p0==0)||(p26==1))))) + ((p22==0) * EX(((p29=...399
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((((!((!(EG(!((p11==1)))) + E(TRUE U ((p0==0)||(p26==1))))) + ((p22==0) * EX(((p29==0)||(p24==...1214
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...455
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-30 01:57:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 01:57:27] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-30 01:57:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph753215723662377383.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph753215723662377383.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph753215723662377383.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph753215723662377383.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph753215723662377383.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-30 01:57:27] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-30 01:57:27] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-30 01:57:27] [INFO ] Removed a total of 81 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:57:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 01:57:27] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 72 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-30 01:57:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16674074967663460122.gal : 18 ms
[2024-05-30 01:57:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16198079774685551323.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16674074967663460122.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16198079774685551323.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.578753,26200,532,29,35837,370,112,150615,31,2311,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EF(!((!((((i2.u12.p41==1)&&(i3.u13.p46==1)) + AG((i3.u13.p45==1)))) + (i2.u9.p31==1)))) U !((((!((AF((i0.u3.p11==1)) + EF(((i2.u10.p0==...577
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((((!((!(EG(!((i0.u3.p11==1)))) + E(TRUE U ((i2.u10.p0==0)||(i1.u7.p26==1))))) + ((i1.u6.p22==...1694
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t31, t35, t43, t49, t52, t55, i0.t75, i0.t39, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t3, i0.u4.t...513
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 79/79 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:57:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 01:57:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 01:57:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 01:57:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 57 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 121 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:57:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 61 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 305 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 16/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 13/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 138/138 variables, and 168 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 3354 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 33/33 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 33/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:58:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 78/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/138 variables, and 253 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 4518 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints]
After SMT, in 7919ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7920ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8042 ms. Remains : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:58:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 01:58:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 01:58:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:58:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 01:58:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 01:58:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6577665008569862877.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 01:58:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality315133832306120776.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6577665008569862877.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality315133832306120776.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.283176,11528,2,1658,5,25215,6,0,317,55142,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AG(EF((AX(((p28==0)||(p34==1))) + (p38==1)))) + AG(EF(((p35==0)||(p27==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U (!(EX(!(((p28==0)||(p34==1))))) + (p38==1)))))))] != FALSE + [(FwdU(I...225
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...455
(forward)formula 0,1,0.871696,32708,1,0,240,167628,181,88,2656,207964,177
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2024-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 79/79 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:58:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 01:58:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 01:58:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 01:58:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 74 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 143 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:58:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 40 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 16/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:58:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:58:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 13/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:58:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 138/138 variables, and 168 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 3117 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 33/33 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 33/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:58:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 78/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:58:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:58:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:58:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:58:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/138 variables, and 253 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 4438 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints]
After SMT, in 7584ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7585ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7731 ms. Remains : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:58:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 01:58:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 01:58:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:58:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2024-05-30 01:58:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 01:58:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1221423726394467712.gal : 12 ms
[2024-05-30 01:58:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5336907797882564952.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1221423726394467712.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5336907797882564952.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.309584,11528,2,1658,5,25215,6,0,317,55142,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AX(((EF(((p3==0)&&(p11==1))) * AG((p50==0))) * ((p48==1)&&((p27==0)||(p55==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(((E(TRUE U ((p3==0)&&(p11==1))) * !(E(TRUE U !((p50==0))))) * ((p48==1)&&((p27==0)||(...179
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...455
(forward)formula 0,1,18.3561,583928,1,0,401,2.13558e+06,182,172,2679,4.88644e+06,377
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2024-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 79/79 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:58:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 01:58:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 01:58:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 01:58:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 83 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 140 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:58:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:58:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 16/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:58:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:58:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 13/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:58:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 138/138 variables, and 168 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 2855 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 33/33 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 33/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:58:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 78/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:58:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:58:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:58:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:58:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:58:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/138 variables, and 253 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 4563 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints]
After SMT, in 7465ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7466ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7612 ms. Remains : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:58:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 01:58:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 01:58:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:58:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 01:58:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 01:58:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14169195766796760920.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 01:58:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3732450607626577512.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14169195766796760920.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3732450607626577512.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.195134,11524,2,1658,5,25215,6,0,317,55142,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((!(EF(!(EG(((p57==0)||(p3==1)))))) * EG((A((((p42==0)||(p24==1))&&(p18==1)) U ((p4==0)&&((p39==0)||(p28==1)))) + EF(((p55==1)||(p15==1)...194
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(EG(!((!(EX(!((p9==1)))) + (p2==1)))))))) * !(E(!(EG(!((!(EX(!((p9==1)))) + (p2==1))))) U (!((!(...452
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...455
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-30 01:59:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 01:59:10] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-30 01:59:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph708219346617942294.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph708219346617942294.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph708219346617942294.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph708219346617942294.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph708219346617942294.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-30 01:59:10] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-30 01:59:10] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-30 01:59:10] [INFO ] Removed a total of 81 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:59:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 01:59:10] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 72 labels/synchronizations in 20 ms.
[2024-05-30 01:59:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5986983620920615284.gal : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 01:59:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15673740227757235709.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5986983620920615284.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15673740227757235709.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.515339,23824,424,29,32156,385,105,133581,31,2300,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((!(EF(!(EG(((i3.u16.p57==0)||(i0.u1.p3==1)))))) * EG((A((((i2.u12.p42==0)||(i1.u7.p24==1))&&(i1.u5.p18==1)) U ((i0.u1.p4==0)&&((i2.u11....270
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(EG(!((!(EX(!((i0.u3.p9==1)))) + (i0.u0.p2==1)))))))) * !(E(!(EG(!((!(EX(!((i0.u3.p9==1)))) + (i...590
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t31, t35, t43, t49, t52, t55, i0.t75, i0.t39, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t3, i0.u4.t...513
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 79/79 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:59:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 01:59:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 01:59:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 01:59:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 54 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 121 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:59:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 59 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 39 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 43 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 53 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 16/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 13/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 138/138 variables, and 168 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 3209 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 33/33 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 33/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 78/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:59:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:59:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 01:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-30 01:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/138 variables, and 253 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 4706 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints]
After SMT, in 7941ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7944ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8072 ms. Remains : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:59:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 01:59:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 01:59:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2024-05-30 01:59:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 01:59:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 01:59:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12064927178242923240.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-30 01:59:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5713137822220482896.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12064927178242923240.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5713137822220482896.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.20094,11520,2,1658,5,25215,6,0,317,55142,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AF(((AF(((p18==0)&&(p17==1))) + ((p12==0)&&(p23==1))) + ((p26==0)||(p17==1)))) + (A(((p53==1) + !(EF(((p17==0)||(p52==1))))) U EX((p2...312
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((!((E(!(EX((p2==1))) U (!(((p53==1) + !(E(TRUE U ((p17==0)||(p52==1)))))) * !(EX((p2=...430
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...455
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-30 02:00:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 02:00:18] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-30 02:00:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8102006114637804275.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8102006114637804275.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8102006114637804275.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8102006114637804275.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8102006114637804275.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-30 02:00:18] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-30 02:00:18] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-30 02:00:18] [INFO ] Removed a total of 81 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-30 02:00:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 02:00:18] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 72 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-30 02:00:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2642465017743612720.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 02:00:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17560566047684988539.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2642465017743612720.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17560566047684988539.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.445987,20660,479,29,26240,66,109,118502,31,291,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AF(((AF(((i1.u5.p18==0)&&(i1.u5.p17==1))) + ((i0.u3.p12==0)&&(i1.u7.p23==1))) + ((i1.u7.p26==0)||(i1.u5.p17==1)))) + (A(((i3.u15.p53=...447
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((!((E(!(EX((i0.u0.p2==1))) U (!(((i3.u15.p53==1) + !(E(TRUE U ((i1.u5.p17==0)||(i3.u1...577
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t31, t35, t43, t49, t52, t55, i0.t75, i0.t39, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t3, i0.u4.t...513
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 19 ms. Remains 58 /59 variables (removed 1) and now considering 78/79 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 58 cols
[2024-05-30 02:00:48] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-30 02:00:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 02:00:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 02:00:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 63 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 105 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-30 02:00:49] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 33 ms returned [26]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 76 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 77 rows 58 cols
[2024-05-30 02:00:49] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 4 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
[2024-05-30 02:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 02:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 02:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 02:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 02:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 02:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 02:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 02:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 02:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 02:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 02:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 02:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 38 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 02:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 02:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 02:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 15/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
[2024-05-30 02:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 02:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 02:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 02:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 02:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 02:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 02:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 02:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 02:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 9/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
[2024-05-30 02:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 02:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 02:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 02:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 02:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 02:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 02:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 02:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 8/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
[2024-05-30 02:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 1/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 77/135 variables, 58/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
[2024-05-30 02:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 02:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 02:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 02:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 4/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
[2024-05-30 02:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 02:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 2/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
[2024-05-30 02:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 02:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 2/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
[2024-05-30 02:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 02:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 02:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 02:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 4/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
[2024-05-30 02:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 1/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
[2024-05-30 02:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 02:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 02:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 3/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
[2024-05-30 02:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
[2024-05-30 02:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 135/135 variables, and 184 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved in 5364 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 58/58 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 58/58 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps: 51/51 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 51/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 77/135 variables, 58/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 76/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
[2024-05-30 02:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 1/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 0/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 135/135 variables, and 261 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved in 2122 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 58/58 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 58/58 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps: 52/52 constraints]
After SMT, in 7515ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7517ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 58/59 places, 77/79 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 12 ms. Remains 58 /58 variables (removed 0) and now considering 77/77 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 7698 ms. Remains : 58/59 places, 77/79 transitions.
[2024-05-30 02:00:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-30 02:00:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 02:00:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 77 transitions.
[2024-05-30 02:00:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 02:00:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 02:00:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16177751006110881590.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 02:00:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16601737243250737079.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16177751006110881590.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16601737243250737079.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.193302,11236,2,1602,5,25114,6,0,312,54825,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(AG(A((p45==1) U (p14==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!((p14==1)) U (!((p45==1)) * !((p14==1)))) + EG(!((p14==1))))))...169
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...450
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-30 02:01:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 02:01:26] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-30 02:01:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16405961656983446257.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16405961656983446257.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16405961656983446257.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16405961656983446257.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16405961656983446257.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-30 02:01:26] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-30 02:01:26] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-30 02:01:26] [INFO ] Removed a total of 79 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-30 02:01:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 02:01:26] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 68 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-30 02:01:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9530729073682087057.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 02:01:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12952210304427183530.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9530729073682087057.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12952210304427183530.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.330871,17700,401,29,22331,55,92,94834,29,247,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(AG(A((i3.u13.p45==1) U (i0.u4.p14==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!((i0.u4.p14==1)) U (!((i3.u13.p45==1)) * !((i0.u4.p14==1)))) +...194
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t30, t33, t42, t47, t52, t53, i0.t72, i0.t39, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t3, i0.u4.t...521
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-30 02:01:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 02:01:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 02:01:56] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-30 02:01:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7797268077672890624.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7797268077672890624.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7797268077672890624.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7797268077672890624.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7797268077672890624.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-30 02:01:56] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-30 02:01:56] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-30 02:01:56] [INFO ] Removed a total of 81 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-30 02:01:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 02:01:56] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 72 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-30 02:01:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14276693749243138840.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 02:01:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17036386321286076690.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14276693749243138840.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17036386321286076690.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 10 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.619642,26728,518,29,36701,414,112,155898,31,2500,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((EF(AG(AX((i3.u13.p47==1)))) + !(((i1.u5.p20!=1) * (A(((i3.u16.p56==0)||(i2.u12.p43==1)) U (i0.u4.p15==0)) + AF(((i0.u4.p15==0)||(i0.u2...514
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(!(EX(TRUE))))))) + ((EX(((i2.u11.p39!=1)&&(!((i0.u1.p4==0)||(i1.u8.p27==1)))...1797
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t31, t35, t43, t49, t52, t55, i0.t75, i0.t39, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t3, i0.u4.t...513
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,221.336,2206436,1,0,2.07953e+06,414,228,1.39858e+07,76,2500,69956
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2024-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: (A(EF((i3.u15.p51==1)) U !(((AF((i3.u13.p45==1)) + !((((i3.u15.p54==1)||(i2.u12.p44==0))||(i0.u0.p1==1)))) + (AG((i3.u15.p51==1)) + (AF(!...316
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY((Init * !((E(!(!(((!(EG(!((i3.u13.p45==1)))) + !((((i3.u15.p54==1)||(i2.u12.p44==0))||(i0.u0.p1==1)))) + (...1583
(forward)formula 1,1,537.559,2577620,1,0,2.41203e+06,414,285,1.61385e+07,77,2500,587903
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2024-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: AG(EX(EF(((!(A((i0.u4.p13==1) U (i2.u10.p36==0))) * AF((i1.u6.p21==1))) * ((i0.u3.p10==0)&&(i0.u1.p6==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(E(TRUE U ((!(!((E(!((i2.u10.p36==0)) U (!((i0.u4.p13==1)) * !((i2.u10.p36==0)))) + EG(!...252
(forward)formula 2,0,624.124,2860892,1,0,2.86556e+06,414,267,1.76004e+07,76,2500,79901
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2024-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: E((E(EF(((i1.u6.p0==0)||(i0.u3.p12==1))) U ((EG(((i1.u8.p27==0)||(i2.u11.p39==1))) * AF((i3.u13.p47==0))) * ((i2.u9.p32==0)||(i3.u13.p45=...289
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,(E(E(TRUE U ((i1.u6.p0==0)||(i0.u3.p12==1))) U ((EG(((i1.u8.p27==0)||(i2.u11.p39==1))) * !(EG(!((i3...438
(forward)formula 3,1,1094.88,3452252,1,0,3.16372e+06,414,357,2.18356e+07,81,2500,898063
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2024-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: (EF(EG(AX((i1.u6.p21==1)))) + !(E((i3.u15.p52==0) U EF(((i3.u13.p48==0)||(i2.u11.p39==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(FwdU((Init * !(E(TRUE U EG(!(EX(!((i1.u6.p21==1)))))))),(i3.u15.p52==0)),TRUE) * ((i3.u13.p48==0)||(i2.u1...175
(forward)formula 4,1,1133.12,3452252,1,0,3.16372e+06,414,401,2.18356e+07,85,2500,1095394
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2024-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: AG((AX(AF(((i1.u7.p24==0)&&(i1.u8.p27==1)))) + AF(AG(A((i1.u5.p17==1) U (i0.u2.p7==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(!(EX(!(!(EG(!(((i1.u7.p24==0)&&(i1.u8.p27==1)))))))))),!(!(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!((i0.u2.p...242
(forward)formula 5,0,1275.53,3798620,1,0,3.32522e+06,414,340,2.18356e+07,80,2500,473759
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2024-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-30 02:26:03] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-30 02:26:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 02:26:03] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-30 02:26:03] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-30 02:26:03] [INFO ] Removed a total of 81 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-30 02:26:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 02:26:03] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 48 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-30 02:26:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4612813112498430578.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 02:26:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17282029072929242601.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4612813112498430578.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17282029072929242601.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 4 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.135608,10312,490,28,14016,103,125,24117,29,263,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EF(!((!((((u13.p41==1)&&(u14.p46==1)) + AG((u14.p45==1)))) + (u10.p31==1)))) U !((((!((AF((u4.p11==1)) + EF(((u18.p0==0)||(u8.p26==1)))...496
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((((!((!(EG(!((u4.p11==1)))) + E(TRUE U ((u18.p0==0)||(u8.p26==1))))) + ((u7.p22==0) * EX(((u9...1473
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t26, t30, t34, t40, t43, t47, t52, t58, t60, t67, t72, t74, u2.t0, u2.t1, u4.t2, u4.t3, u5.t4...422
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
(forward)formula 0,0,98.2481,2221592,1,0,4.11188e+06,149,293,9.78823e+06,71,280,1365913
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2024-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: A((!(EF(!(EG(((u17.p57==0)||(u2.p3==1)))))) * EG((A((((u13.p42==0)||(u8.p24==1))&&(u6.p18==1)) U ((u2.p4==0)&&((u12.p39==0)||(u9.p28==1))...234
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(EG(!((!(EX(!((u4.p9==1)))) + (u1.p2==1)))))))) * !(E(!(EG(!((!(EX(!((u4.p9==1)))) + (u1.p2==1))...524
(forward)formula 1,0,178.983,2520968,1,0,4.50164e+06,149,319,1.15358e+07,75,280,1672710
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: AG((AF(((AF(((u6.p18==0)&&(u6.p17==1))) + ((u4.p12==0)&&(u8.p23==1))) + ((u8.p26==0)||(u6.p17==1)))) + (A(((u16.p53==1) + !(EF(((u6.p17==...384
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((!((E(!(EX((u1.p2==1))) U (!(((u16.p53==1) + !(E(TRUE U ((u6.p17==0)||(u16.p52==1))))...508
(forward)formula 2,0,251.115,2774144,1,0,5.02167e+06,149,405,1.24558e+07,82,280,1109706
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: AG(EF(AG(A((u14.p45==1) U (u5.p14==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!((u5.p14==1)) U (!((u14.p45==1)) * !((u5.p14==1)))) + EG(!((u5...182
(forward)formula 3,0,264.931,2774144,1,0,5.02167e+06,149,431,1.24558e+07,83,280,2037035
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Total runtime 2450210 ms.

BK_STOP 1717036228442

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldRVs-PT-004A"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldRVs-PT-004A, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r356-tall-171683761800753"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldRVs-PT-004A.tgz
mv ShieldRVs-PT-004A execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;