Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r356-tall-171683761400594.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldPPPt-PT-005A, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r356-tall-171683761400594
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 536K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 69K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.4K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 53K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.4K Apr 23 07:54 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K Apr 23 07:54 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K Apr 23 07:54 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Apr 23 07:54 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K Apr 11 14:59 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 138K Apr 11 14:59 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Apr 11 14:57 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 100K Apr 11 14:57 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Apr 23 07:54 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 23 07:54 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 33K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-005A-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-005A-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-005A-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-005A-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-005A-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-005A-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-005A-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-005A-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-005A-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-005A-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-005A-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-005A-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-005A-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-005A-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-005A-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-005A-CTLFireability-2023-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1717006542234

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldPPPt-PT-005A
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-29 18:15:43] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-29 18:15:43] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-29 18:15:43] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 61 ms
[2024-05-29 18:15:43] [INFO ] Transformed 128 places.
[2024-05-29 18:15:43] [INFO ] Transformed 93 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:15:43] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-29 18:15:43] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 128 places and 93 transitions and 366 arcs in 155 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 13 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 1 transitions.
Support contains 100 out of 128 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 128/128 places, 92/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 14 ms. Remains 128 /128 variables (removed 0) and now considering 92/92 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 128 cols
[2024-05-29 18:15:43] [INFO ] Computed 56 invariants in 8 ms
[2024-05-29 18:15:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 225 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:15:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:15:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 133 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 387 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 91 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:15:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 127/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/128 variables, 56/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 92/220 variables, 128/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 0/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 220/220 variables, and 312 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved in 2146 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 128/128 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 128/128 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 127/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/128 variables, 56/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 92/220 variables, 128/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 91/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 0/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 220/220 variables, and 403 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved in 2687 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 128/128 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 128/128 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 4914ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4939ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5364 ms. Remains : 128/128 places, 92/92 transitions.
Support contains 100 out of 128 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-29 18:15:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2024-05-29 18:15:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-29 18:15:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
Support contains 99 out of 128 places (down from 100) after GAL structural reductions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 69 to 65
RANDOM walk for 36716 steps (8 resets) in 949 ms. (38 steps per ms) remains 0/65 properties
[2024-05-29 18:15:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-29 18:15:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-29 18:15:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 128/128 places, 92/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 128 /128 variables (removed 0) and now considering 92/92 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:15:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:15:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 80 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:15:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:15:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 122 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 202 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 91 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:15:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 127/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/128 variables, 56/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 92/220 variables, 128/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 0/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 220/220 variables, and 312 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved in 1744 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 128/128 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 128/128 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 127/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/128 variables, 56/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 92/220 variables, 128/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 91/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 0/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 220/220 variables, and 403 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved in 2590 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 128/128 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 128/128 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 4354ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4356ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4563 ms. Remains : 128/128 places, 92/92 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:15:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-29 18:15:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-29 18:15:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:15:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-29 18:15:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-29 18:15:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9821653324987381506.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:15:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14984992508005154176.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9821653324987381506.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14984992508005154176.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.048e+18,0.24687,14100,2,356,5,46754,6,0,606,70401,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((((p38==1)&&(p52==1)) * (AX(((p31==1)&&(p46==1))) * AF(((p104==1)&&(p123==1))))) U (!(E(!(((E(((p11==1)&&(p21==1)) U ((p30==1)&&(p47==1...338
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,(((p38==1)&&(p52==1)) * (!(EX(!(((p31==1)&&(p46==1))))) * !(EG(!(((p104==1)&&(p123==1)))))))) * !(E...402
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 86/5/6
(forward)formula 0,0,2.32109,92872,1,0,128,397805,61,80,3249,734280,101
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-005A-CTLFireability-2024-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 128/128 places, 92/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 128 /128 variables (removed 0) and now considering 92/92 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:15:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:15:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 97 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:15:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:15:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 105 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 202 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 91 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:15:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 127/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/128 variables, 56/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 92/220 variables, 128/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 0/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 220/220 variables, and 312 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved in 1684 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 128/128 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 128/128 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 127/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/128 variables, 56/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 92/220 variables, 128/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 91/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 0/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 220/220 variables, and 403 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved in 2554 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 128/128 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 128/128 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 4251ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4252ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4463 ms. Remains : 128/128 places, 92/92 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:16:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-29 18:16:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 18:16:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:16:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 18:16:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 18:16:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12318498967859680085.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:16:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3173857632726192035.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12318498967859680085.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3173857632726192035.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.048e+18,0.220028,14176,2,356,5,46754,6,0,606,70401,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(E(!((A(!(((p63==1)&&(p77==1))) U A(((p78==1)&&(p101==1)) U ((p104==1)&&(p123==1)))) + ((p20==1) * EG(((p32==1)&&(p34==1)))))) U (p51==...159
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(EY(Init),!((!((E(!(!((E(!(((p104==1)&&(p123==1))) U (!(((p78==1)&&(p101==1))) * !(((p104==1)&&(p123==1)))...551
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 87/0/5
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-29 18:16:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 18:16:31] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-29 18:16:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15473992102057806062.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15473992102057806062.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15473992102057806062.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15473992102057806062.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15473992102057806062.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-29 18:16:31] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-29 18:16:31] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-29 18:16:31] [INFO ] Removed a total of 15 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:16:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2024-05-29 18:16:31] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2024-05-29 18:16:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12075356390328201420.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:16:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18369858025751455740.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12075356390328201420.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18369858025751455740.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.048e+18,0.090974,7784,70,15,8362,236,272,18044,33,920,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(E(!((A(!(((i2.u19.p63==1)&&(i5.u24.p77==1))) U A(((i9.u25.p78==1)&&(i9.u32.p101==1)) U ((i12.i0.u33.p104==1)&&(i12.i0.u38.p123==1)))) ...239
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(EY(Init),!((!((E(!(!((E(!(((i12.i0.u33.p104==1)&&(i12.i0.u38.p123==1))) U (!(((i9.u25.p78==1)&&(i9.u32.p1...835
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 128/128 places, 92/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 128 /128 variables (removed 0) and now considering 92/92 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:17:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 86 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:17:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:17:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 112 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 200 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 91 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 127/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/128 variables, 56/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 92/220 variables, 128/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 0/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 220/220 variables, and 312 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved in 1780 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 128/128 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 128/128 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 127/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/128 variables, 56/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 92/220 variables, 128/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 91/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 0/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 220/220 variables, and 403 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved in 2534 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 128/128 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 128/128 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 4326ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4328ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4533 ms. Remains : 128/128 places, 92/92 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12548690899000789080.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3108428610842157896.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12548690899000789080.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3108428610842157896.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.048e+18,0.24178,14200,2,356,5,46754,6,0,606,70401,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG(AX(((p63==1)&&(p77==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(EX(!(((p63==1)&&(p77==1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.288529,14200,1,0,7,46754,17,0,3033,70401,7
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-005A-CTLFireability-2024-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 128/128 places, 92/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 128 /128 variables (removed 0) and now considering 92/92 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:17:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:17:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:17:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 98 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 171 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 91 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 127/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/128 variables, 56/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 92/220 variables, 128/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 0/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 220/220 variables, and 312 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved in 1789 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 128/128 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 128/128 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 127/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/128 variables, 56/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 92/220 variables, 128/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 91/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 0/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 220/220 variables, and 403 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved in 2577 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 128/128 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 128/128 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 4377ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4378ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4553 ms. Remains : 128/128 places, 92/92 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15715880804538139546.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17915002137517082028.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15715880804538139546.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17915002137517082028.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.048e+18,0.242298,14200,2,356,5,46754,6,0,606,70401,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AX((((p95==1)&&(p110==1)) * EF((EX(((p8==1)&&(p25==1))) + ((p83==1)&&(p100==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!((((p95==1)&&(p110==1)) * E(TRUE U (EX(((p8==1)&&(p25==1))) + ((p83==1)&&(p100==1)))))...169
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.304741,14200,1,0,11,46754,16,3,2900,70401,9
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-005A-CTLFireability-2024-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 128/128 places, 92/92 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 127 transition count 91
Applied a total of 2 rules in 20 ms. Remains 127 /128 variables (removed 1) and now considering 91/92 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 91 rows 127 cols
[2024-05-29 18:17:11] [INFO ] Computed 56 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 72 ms returned [120]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 74 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 126/128 places, 91/92 transitions.
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 126 transition count 89
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 124 transition count 89
Applied a total of 4 rules in 10 ms. Remains 124 /126 variables (removed 2) and now considering 89/91 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 124 cols
[2024-05-29 18:17:11] [INFO ] Computed 55 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned [106, 110]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 67 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 122/128 places, 89/92 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 120 transition count 87
Applied a total of 4 rules in 7 ms. Remains 120 /122 variables (removed 2) and now considering 87/89 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 87 rows 120 cols
[2024-05-29 18:17:11] [INFO ] Computed 53 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 65 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:17:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:17:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 95 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 162 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 120/128 places, 87/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 340 ms. Remains : 120/128 places, 87/92 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 87 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2845519279197978571.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10898890176263574989.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2845519279197978571.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10898890176263574989.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.6384e+17,0.21253,12836,2,331,5,40863,6,0,569,61538,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((p115==1) * EF(((((p47==1)||(p0==1))&&(p24==1))&&((p16==1)&&(p27==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p115==1)),TRUE) * ((((p47==1)||(p0==1))&&(p24==1))&&((p16==1)&&(p27==1))))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 0,1,0.21833,12836,1,0,9,40863,10,2,1060,61538,4
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-005A-CTLFireability-2024-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 128/128 places, 92/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 128 /128 variables (removed 0) and now considering 92/92 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 128 cols
[2024-05-29 18:17:11] [INFO ] Computed 56 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 78 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:17:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:17:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 101 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 181 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 91 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 127/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/128 variables, 56/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 92/220 variables, 128/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 0/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 220/220 variables, and 312 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved in 1775 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 128/128 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 128/128 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 127/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/128 variables, 56/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 92/220 variables, 128/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 91/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 0/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 220/220 variables, and 403 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved in 2567 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 128/128 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 128/128 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 4354ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4355ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4540 ms. Remains : 128/128 places, 92/92 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13181226326308217414.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17080317469022428959.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13181226326308217414.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17080317469022428959.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.048e+18,0.230917,13936,2,356,5,46754,6,0,606,70401,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((p122==1) * (EG(((p115==1)||((p118==1)&&(p125==1)))) + EG(EX((p47==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p122==1)),((p115==1)||((p118==1)&&(p125==1))))] != FALSE + [FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (...189
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 85/0/7
(forward)formula 0,1,0.275283,14200,1,0,10,46754,20,2,3122,70401,10
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-005A-CTLFireability-2024-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 128/128 places, 92/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 128 /128 variables (removed 0) and now considering 92/92 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:17:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:17:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:17:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 87 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 152 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 91 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 127/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/128 variables, 56/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 92/220 variables, 128/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 0/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 220/220 variables, and 312 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved in 1803 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 128/128 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 128/128 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 127/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/128 variables, 56/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 92/220 variables, 128/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 91/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 0/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 220/220 variables, and 403 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved in 2625 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 128/128 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 128/128 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 4441ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4442ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4596 ms. Remains : 128/128 places, 92/92 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11737127087547727682.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3034878562142898404.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11737127087547727682.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3034878562142898404.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.048e+18,0.236046,14200,2,356,5,46754,6,0,606,70401,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((!(((((p105==1)&&(p122==1))&&((p112==1)&&(p114==1)))&&(((p90==1)&&(p124==1))&&(!(((p83==1)&&(p100==1))||(p72==1)))))) + EF((!(((p29==1...807
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(FwdU(Init,((!(((((p105==1)&&(p122==1))&&((p112==1)&&(p114==1)))&&(((p90==1)&&(p124==1))&&(!(((p83==1)&&...2771
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 86/0/6
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 82/0/10
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 87/0/5
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 86/5/6
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 86/5/6
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,0.751594,28784,1,0,45,123824,90,19,3695,151249,50
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-005A-CTLFireability-2024-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 128/128 places, 92/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 128 /128 variables (removed 0) and now considering 92/92 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:17:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 72 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:17:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:17:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 102 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 174 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 91 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 127/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/128 variables, 56/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 92/220 variables, 128/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 0/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 220/220 variables, and 312 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved in 1776 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 128/128 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 128/128 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 127/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/128 variables, 56/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 92/220 variables, 128/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 91/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 0/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 220/220 variables, and 403 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved in 2606 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 128/128 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 128/128 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 4395ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4396ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4575 ms. Remains : 128/128 places, 92/92 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4872788263620502406.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13054592667963050256.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4872788263620502406.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13054592667963050256.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.048e+18,0.236999,13936,2,356,5,46754,6,0,606,70401,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EX(AX(AX(AX(((p2==1)&&(p10==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(EX(!(!(EX(!(!(EX(!(((p2==1)&&(p10==1))))))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.275295,14200,1,0,6,46754,11,0,2815,70401,4
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-005A-CTLFireability-2024-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 128/128 places, 92/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 128 /128 variables (removed 0) and now considering 92/92 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:17:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:17:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:17:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 94 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 162 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 91 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 127/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/128 variables, 56/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 92/220 variables, 128/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 0/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 220/220 variables, and 312 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved in 1757 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 128/128 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 128/128 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 127/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/128 variables, 56/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 92/220 variables, 128/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 91/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 0/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 220/220 variables, and 403 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved in 2631 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 128/128 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 128/128 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 4399ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4400ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4566 ms. Remains : 128/128 places, 92/92 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18339351710536800828.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16171680598440358007.ctl : 4 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18339351710536800828.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16171680598440358007.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.048e+18,0.235391,14204,2,356,5,46754,6,0,606,70401,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E(EG(!(AF(AG(((p95==1)&&(p110==1)))))) U AX(((((p38==1)&&(p52==1))&&((p3==1)&&(p26==1))) * (((((p57==1)&&(p59==1))||((p53==1)&&(p76==1)...235
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,EG(!(!(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((p95==1)&&(p110==1))))))))))) * !(EX(!(((((p38==1)&&(p52==1))&&((p3==1)&&(...346
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 89/0/3
(forward)formula 0,1,0.300073,14204,1,0,13,46754,26,4,3145,70401,13
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-005A-CTLFireability-2024-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 128/128 places, 92/92 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 127 transition count 91
Applied a total of 2 rules in 15 ms. Remains 127 /128 variables (removed 1) and now considering 91/92 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 91 rows 127 cols
[2024-05-29 18:17:31] [INFO ] Computed 56 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 79 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:17:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:17:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 89 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 168 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-29 18:17:31] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 90 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 126/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/127 variables, 56/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 91/218 variables, 127/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/218 variables, 0/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 218/218 variables, and 310 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 1724 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 127/127 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 127/127 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 126/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/127 variables, 56/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 91/218 variables, 127/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 90/400 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/400 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/218 variables, 0/400 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 218/218 variables, and 400 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 2296 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 127/127 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 127/127 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 4032ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4033ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 127/128 places, 91/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4227 ms. Remains : 127/128 places, 91/92 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 91 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18315495760202420249.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16097927679585735645.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18315495760202420249.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16097927679585735645.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.6384e+18,0.230181,13936,2,351,5,45743,6,0,601,68986,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((E(AF(((p43==1)&&(p50==1))) U (EG(((p106==1)&&(p121==1))) + ((p62==1)&&(p64==1)))) * (p38==1)) * (p52==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(FwdU(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p52==1)) * (p38==1)),!(EG(!(((p43==1)&&(p50==1)))))),((p106==1)&&(p121==1)))] !...280
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 86/4/5
(forward)formula 0,1,0.373144,14200,1,0,49,52878,33,30,3118,68986,52
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-005A-CTLFireability-2024-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 128/128 places, 92/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 128 /128 variables (removed 0) and now considering 92/92 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 128 cols
[2024-05-29 18:17:36] [INFO ] Computed 56 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 72 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:17:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:17:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 99 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 173 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 91 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 127/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/128 variables, 56/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 92/220 variables, 128/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 0/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 220/220 variables, and 312 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved in 1794 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 128/128 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 128/128 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 127/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/128 variables, 56/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 92/220 variables, 128/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 91/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 0/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 220/220 variables, and 403 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved in 2439 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 128/128 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 128/128 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 4245ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4246ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4424 ms. Remains : 128/128 places, 92/92 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability783126986474930242.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4236517599285715372.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability783126986474930242.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4236517599285715372.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.048e+18,0.248106,14200,2,356,5,46754,6,0,606,70401,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((AF(((p12==1)&&(p14==1))) + AX((EX(((p108==1)&&(p125==1))) * AX((((p37==1)&&(p39==1))&&((p81==1)&&(p96==1))))))) U (EF((((p36==1)&&(p46...245
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,(!(EG(!(((p12==1)&&(p14==1))))) + !(EX(!((EX(((p108==1)&&(p125==1))) * !(EX(!((((p37==1)&&(p39==1))...321
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 89/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 89/2/3
(forward)formula 0,1,0.376776,14200,1,0,21,46754,49,7,3202,70401,25
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-005A-CTLFireability-2024-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 128/128 places, 92/92 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 126 transition count 90
Applied a total of 4 rules in 16 ms. Remains 126 /128 variables (removed 2) and now considering 90/92 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 126 cols
[2024-05-29 18:17:41] [INFO ] Computed 56 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned [119]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 75 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 125/128 places, 90/92 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 125 transition count 89
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 124 transition count 89
Applied a total of 2 rules in 7 ms. Remains 124 /125 variables (removed 1) and now considering 89/90 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 124 cols
[2024-05-29 18:17:41] [INFO ] Computed 55 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned [106]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 65 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 123/128 places, 89/92 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 122 transition count 88
Applied a total of 2 rules in 5 ms. Remains 122 /123 variables (removed 1) and now considering 88/89 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 88 rows 122 cols
[2024-05-29 18:17:41] [INFO ] Computed 54 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:17:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:17:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 87 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 148 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 122/128 places, 88/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 316 ms. Remains : 122/128 places, 88/92 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 88 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability307414915242183806.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability684993823044189052.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability307414915242183806.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability684993823044189052.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...281
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.2768e+17,0.219586,12848,2,336,5,41341,6,0,578,62294,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(((p7==1)&&(p9==1))) U AG(((AG(((((p61==1)&&(p71==1))||(p51==1))||(!((p78==1)&&(p101==1))))) + E(((p112==1)&&(p114==1)) U (((p91==1)&&...215
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(((p7==1)&&(p9==1)))) * !(E(TRUE U !(((!(E(TRUE U !(((((p61==1)&&(p71==1))||(p51==1))||(!((p78==1)&...285
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 85/2/3
(forward)formula 0,0,0.293993,13112,1,0,12,41341,24,2,2818,62294,12
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-005A-CTLFireability-2024-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 128/128 places, 92/92 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 126 transition count 90
Applied a total of 4 rules in 9 ms. Remains 126 /128 variables (removed 2) and now considering 90/92 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 126 cols
[2024-05-29 18:17:41] [INFO ] Computed 56 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 81 ms returned [119]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 82 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 125/128 places, 90/92 transitions.
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 125 transition count 88
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 123 transition count 88
Applied a total of 4 rules in 10 ms. Remains 123 /125 variables (removed 2) and now considering 88/90 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 88 rows 123 cols
[2024-05-29 18:17:42] [INFO ] Computed 55 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned [106, 110]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 69 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 121/128 places, 88/92 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 119 transition count 86
Applied a total of 4 rules in 4 ms. Remains 119 /121 variables (removed 2) and now considering 86/88 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 119 cols
[2024-05-29 18:17:42] [INFO ] Computed 53 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:17:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:17:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 104 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 169 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 119/128 places, 86/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 343 ms. Remains : 119/128 places, 86/92 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 86 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8012693239299215549.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3801861513524419396.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8012693239299215549.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3801861513524419396.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.31072e+17,0.221353,12576,2,326,5,40583,6,0,564,61139,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((p124==1) + EG((AG(((p31==0)||(p46==0))) * AF((p74==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p124==1))] != FALSE + [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),(!(E(TRUE U !(((p31==0)||(p46==0))))) * !(EG(!...180
(forward)formula 0,1,0.222025,12840,1,0,7,40583,8,1,567,61139,1
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-005A-CTLFireability-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 128/128 places, 92/92 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 126 transition count 90
Applied a total of 4 rules in 6 ms. Remains 126 /128 variables (removed 2) and now considering 90/92 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 126 cols
[2024-05-29 18:17:42] [INFO ] Computed 56 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned [119]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 69 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 125/128 places, 90/92 transitions.
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 125 transition count 88
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 123 transition count 88
Applied a total of 4 rules in 5 ms. Remains 123 /125 variables (removed 2) and now considering 88/90 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 88 rows 123 cols
[2024-05-29 18:17:42] [INFO ] Computed 55 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned [106, 110]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 69 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 121/128 places, 88/92 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 119 transition count 86
Applied a total of 4 rules in 5 ms. Remains 119 /121 variables (removed 2) and now considering 86/88 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 119 cols
[2024-05-29 18:17:42] [INFO ] Computed 53 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:17:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:17:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 90 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 158 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 119/128 places, 86/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 312 ms. Remains : 119/128 places, 86/92 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 86 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13620050492836702593.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15521296471471854491.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13620050492836702593.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15521296471471854491.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.31072e+17,0.21691,12564,2,326,5,40583,6,0,564,61139,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AG(AF(!(((p38==1)&&(p52==1))))) U EG((!((E((p45==1) U ((p87==1)&&(p89==1))) * (!(((p31==1)&&(p46==1))) + E(((p57==1)&&(p59==1)) U ((p20...207
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,!(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!(!(((p38==1)&&(p52==1)))))))))),(!((E((p45==1) U ((p87==1)&&(p89==1))) * (!((...275
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 83/2/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 82/0/4
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-29 18:18:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-29 18:18:12] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-29 18:18:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14733976551686620430.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14733976551686620430.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14733976551686620430.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14733976551686620430.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14733976551686620430.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-29 18:18:12] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-29 18:18:12] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-29 18:18:12] [INFO ] Removed a total of 14 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:18:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-29 18:18:12] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-29 18:18:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15804228781682165273.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:18:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability651860107690631956.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15804228781682165273.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability651860107690631956.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.31072e+17,0.103858,8300,66,15,9530,218,264,22349,31,1173,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AG(AF(!(((i3.u11.p38==1)&&(i5.i1.u16.p52==1))))) U EG((!((E((i7.u13.p45==1) U ((i11.u27.p87==1)&&(i11.u27.p89==1))) * (!(((i5.i0.u10.p3...310
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,!(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!(!(((i3.u11.p38==1)&&(i5.i1.u16.p52==1)))))))))),(!((E((i7.u13.p45==1) U ((i1...378
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 128/128 places, 92/92 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 126 transition count 90
Applied a total of 4 rules in 8 ms. Remains 126 /128 variables (removed 2) and now considering 90/92 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 126 cols
[2024-05-29 18:18:43] [INFO ] Computed 56 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:18:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 74 ms returned [119]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 74 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 125/128 places, 90/92 transitions.
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 125 transition count 88
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 123 transition count 88
Applied a total of 4 rules in 4 ms. Remains 123 /125 variables (removed 2) and now considering 88/90 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 88 rows 123 cols
[2024-05-29 18:18:43] [INFO ] Computed 55 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:18:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 65 ms returned [106, 110]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 66 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 121/128 places, 88/92 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 119 transition count 86
Applied a total of 4 rules in 3 ms. Remains 119 /121 variables (removed 2) and now considering 86/88 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 119 cols
[2024-05-29 18:18:43] [INFO ] Computed 53 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-29 18:18:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:18:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:18:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 90 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 154 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 119/128 places, 86/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 309 ms. Remains : 119/128 places, 86/92 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:18:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:18:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:18:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 86 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:18:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:18:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:18:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16561679338826654302.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:18:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability641889007862310385.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16561679338826654302.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability641889007862310385.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.31072e+17,0.206881,12572,2,326,5,40583,6,0,564,61139,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!(((((p108==1)&&(p125==1))||(!((p12==1)&&(p14==1)))) + (AF(((p15==1)&&(p49==1))) + ((p92==1)&&(p94==1))))) U !(AG(A(EF(((p86==1)&&(p96=...191
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(!(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!(!(((p26==1)&&(p126==1)))) U (!(E(TRUE U ((p86==1)&&(p96==1)))) * !(!(((p2...681
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.419905,17608,1,0,9,69467,31,1,2924,76115,12
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-005A-CTLFireability-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 128/128 places, 92/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 128 /128 variables (removed 0) and now considering 92/92 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 128 cols
[2024-05-29 18:18:43] [INFO ] Computed 56 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:18:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 77 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:18:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:18:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 96 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 174 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 91 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:18:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 127/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/128 variables, 56/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 92/220 variables, 128/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 0/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 220/220 variables, and 312 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved in 1758 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 128/128 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 128/128 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 127/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/128 variables, 56/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 92/220 variables, 128/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 91/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 0/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 220/220 variables, and 403 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved in 2545 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 128/128 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 128/128 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 4317ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4318ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4493 ms. Remains : 128/128 places, 92/92 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:18:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:18:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:18:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:18:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:18:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:18:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8981624365324782270.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:18:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9394600136032900536.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8981624365324782270.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9394600136032900536.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.048e+18,0.231557,14200,2,356,5,46754,6,0,606,70401,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((p124==1) U (EG(EX((p120==1))) + ((AX(AF(((p31==1)&&(p46==1)))) * EF(!(((p107==1)&&(p109==1))))) * !(EG((p72==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(FwdU(Init,(p124==1)),EX((p120==1)))] != FALSE + [((FwdU(Init,(p124==1)) * (!(EX(!(!(EG(!(((p31==1)&&(p46=...235
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 88/0/4
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.285687,14200,1,0,13,46754,44,2,3141,70401,18
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-005A-CTLFireability-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2024-05-29 18:18:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-29 18:18:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:18:48] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-29 18:18:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1471194071560495056.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1471194071560495056.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1471194071560495056.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1471194071560495056.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1471194071560495056.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-29 18:18:48] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-29 18:18:48] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-29 18:18:48] [INFO ] Removed a total of 15 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:18:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 18:18:48] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-29 18:18:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17572312609924969926.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:18:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3441094221696599931.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17572312609924969926.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3441094221696599931.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 2 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.048e+18,0.101247,8584,64,15,9507,243,254,21971,33,931,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(E(!((A(!(((i7.u19.p63==1)&&(i6.i0.u24.p77==1))) U A(((i10.u25.p78==1)&&(i11.u32.p101==1)) U ((i14.u33.p104==1)&&(i14.u38.p123==1)))) +...238
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(EY(Init),!((!((E(!(!((E(!(((i14.u33.p104==1)&&(i14.u38.p123==1))) U (!(((i10.u25.p78==1)&&(i11.u32.p101==...790
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-29 18:39:49] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-29 18:39:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:39:49] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-29 18:39:49] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-29 18:39:49] [INFO ] Removed a total of 30 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:39:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 18:39:49] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-29 18:39:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11384305329192476642.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:39:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4393164161353336388.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11384305329192476642.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4393164161353336388.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 2 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.048e+18,0.071869,6556,94,5,6459,156,276,7746,12,134,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(E(!((A(!(((i19.u36.p63==1)&&(u43.p77==1))) U A(((u44.p78==1)&&(u57.p101==1)) U ((u58.p104==1)&&(u69.p123==1)))) + ((u12.p20==1) * EG((...211
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(EY(Init),!((!((E(!(!((E(!(((u58.p104==1)&&(u69.p123==1))) U (!(((u44.p78==1)&&(u57.p101==1))) * !(((u58.p...683
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-29 19:00:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 19:00:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
[2024-05-29 19:00:51] [INFO ] Transformed 128 places.
[2024-05-29 19:00:51] [INFO ] Transformed 92 transitions.
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/pinvar' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/RGMEDD2' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn' '-META' '-varord-only'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Using order generated by GreatSPN with heuristic : META
[2024-05-29 19:00:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5797171102597309429.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 19:00:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6226176485869524979.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5797171102597309429.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6226176485869524979.ctl' '--load-order' '/home/mcc/execution/model.ord' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...328
Successfully loaded order from file /home/mcc/execution/model.ord
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 2 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.048e+18,0.842241,35912,2,1372,5,157910,6,0,606,192918,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(E(!((A(!(((p63==1)&&(p77==1))) U A(((p78==1)&&(p101==1)) U ((p104==1)&&(p123==1)))) + ((p20==1) * EG(((p32==1)&&(p34==1)))))) U (p51==...159
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(EY(Init),!((!((E(!(!((E(!(((p104==1)&&(p123==1))) U (!(((p78==1)&&(p101==1))) * !(((p104==1)&&(p123==1)))...551
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 87/0/5
Using saturation style SCC detection

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldPPPt-PT-005A"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldPPPt-PT-005A, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r356-tall-171683761400594"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldPPPt-PT-005A.tgz
mv ShieldPPPt-PT-005A execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;