About the Execution of ITS-Tools for ShieldPPPt-PT-003A
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
346.695 | 37058.00 | 53991.00 | 186.90 | FFTTFFTFFTTFTFFT | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r356-tall-171683761400562.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldPPPt-PT-003A, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r356-tall-171683761400562
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 584K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.0K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 63K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.7K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 55K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Apr 23 07:54 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K Apr 23 07:54 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K Apr 23 07:54 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Apr 23 07:54 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Apr 11 14:38 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 181K Apr 11 14:38 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K Apr 11 14:37 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 117K Apr 11 14:37 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Apr 23 07:54 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 23 07:54 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 21K May 18 16:43 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2023-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1717002614188
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldPPPt-PT-003A
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-29 17:10:15] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-29 17:10:15] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-29 17:10:15] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 49 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:15] [INFO ] Transformed 78 places.
[2024-05-29 17:10:15] [INFO ] Transformed 57 transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:15] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-29 17:10:15] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 78 places and 57 transitions and 222 arcs in 144 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 14 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 1 transitions.
Support contains 72 out of 78 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 78 /78 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 78 cols
[2024-05-29 17:10:15] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 7 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 187 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 17:10:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 17:10:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 86 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 300 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 55 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 34/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 56/134 variables, 78/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 134/134 variables, and 190 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved in 969 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 34/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 56/134 variables, 78/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 55/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 134/134 variables, and 245 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved in 985 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1994ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2011ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2338 ms. Remains : 78/78 places, 56/56 transitions.
Support contains 72 out of 78 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 69 to 55
RANDOM walk for 5646 steps (0 resets) in 292 ms. (19 steps per ms) remains 0/55 properties
[2024-05-29 17:10:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 78 /78 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 17:10:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 17:10:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 17:10:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 64 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 118 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 55 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 34/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 56/134 variables, 78/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 134/134 variables, and 190 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved in 790 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 34/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 56/134 variables, 78/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 55/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 134/134 variables, and 245 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved in 941 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1753ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1755ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1876 ms. Remains : 78/78 places, 56/56 transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1382612260612493647.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15756491303645999493.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1382612260612493647.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15756491303645999493.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.28e+11,0.146361,10144,2,216,5,29612,6,0,370,44255,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((!((!(((AG(((p36==1)&&(p46==1))) * (p61==1)) * (p71==1))) + EG((EF(((p40==1)&&(p74==1))) + (((p33==1)&&(p50==1))&&((p57==1)&&(p59==1)))...321
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,(!((!(((!(E(TRUE U !(((p36==1)&&(p46==1))))) * (p61==1)) * (p71==1))) + EG((E(TRUE U ((p40==1)&&(p7...495
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,0.215853,10396,1,0,30,29612,53,15,1991,44255,38
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 78 /78 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 17:10:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 17:10:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 17:10:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 92 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 156 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 55 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 34/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 56/134 variables, 78/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 134/134 variables, and 190 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved in 770 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 34/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 56/134 variables, 78/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 55/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 134/134 variables, and 245 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved in 944 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1727ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1728ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1887 ms. Remains : 78/78 places, 56/56 transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9710808780202818577.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8074643906080390690.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9710808780202818577.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8074643906080390690.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.28e+11,0.148651,10220,2,216,5,29612,6,0,370,44255,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((EF(((p42==0)||(p44==0))) * !(A((((p4==1)&&(p23==1))||((p15==1)&&(p49==1))) U AX(((p63==1)&&(p77==1)))))) * (EX(((p28==0)||(p51==0)))...210
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((p42==0)||(p44==0)))))] = FALSE * [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!(!(EX(!(((p63==1)...426
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,0.208025,10220,1,0,18,29612,28,7,1920,44255,20
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 56/56 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 75 transition count 54
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 75 transition count 52
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 73 transition count 52
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 72 transition count 51
Applied a total of 9 rules in 35 ms. Remains 72 /78 variables (removed 6) and now considering 51/56 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 51 rows 72 cols
[2024-05-29 17:10:22] [INFO ] Computed 33 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned [55, 59]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 65 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 70/78 places, 51/56 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 68 transition count 49
Applied a total of 4 rules in 6 ms. Remains 68 /70 variables (removed 2) and now considering 49/51 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 49 rows 68 cols
[2024-05-29 17:10:22] [INFO ] Computed 31 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 17:10:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 17:10:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 60 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 108 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 68/78 places, 49/56 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 214 ms. Remains : 68/78 places, 49/56 transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 49 transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4478713119823170344.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17369856221344965170.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4478713119823170344.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17369856221344965170.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.192e+09,0.041307,5392,2,178,5,9550,6,0,324,12770,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG(((p32==1)&&(p34==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),((p32==1)&&(p34==1)))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 46/2/3
(forward)formula 0,1,0.053642,5656,1,0,6,9550,19,0,1600,12770,8
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 78 /78 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 78 cols
[2024-05-29 17:10:23] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 17:10:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 17:10:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 62 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 117 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 55 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 34/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 56/134 variables, 78/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 134/134 variables, and 190 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved in 722 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 34/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 56/134 variables, 78/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 55/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 134/134 variables, and 245 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved in 921 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1655ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1656ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1775 ms. Remains : 78/78 places, 56/56 transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability873360454865006369.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5498645954242771440.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability873360454865006369.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5498645954242771440.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.28e+11,0.13282,10220,2,216,5,29612,6,0,370,44255,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AX(EG(((p67==0)||(p69==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(EX(!(EG(((p67==0)||(p69==0))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.167214,10220,1,0,10,29612,22,2,1845,44255,8
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 78 /78 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 17:10:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 72 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 17:10:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 17:10:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 67 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 140 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 55 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 34/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 56/134 variables, 78/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 134/134 variables, and 190 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved in 751 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 34/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 56/134 variables, 78/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 55/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 134/134 variables, and 245 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved in 930 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1690ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1691ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1834 ms. Remains : 78/78 places, 56/56 transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3597616517446208686.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16770478829714909713.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3597616517446208686.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16770478829714909713.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.28e+11,0.139022,10216,2,216,5,29612,6,0,370,44255,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((p8==1)&&(p25==1)) U ((EF(AX(AG(((p4==1)&&(p23==1))))) + AG(AX(EX(((p8==1)&&(p25==1)))))) + ((p63==1)&&(p77==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(FwdU(Init,((p8==1)&&(p25==1))),TRUE) * !(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((p4==1)&&(p23==1)))))))))] != FALSE + [(Fwd...316
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 50/5/6
(forward)formula 0,0,0.160521,10216,1,0,11,29612,23,2,1787,44255,13
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 78 /78 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 17:10:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 17:10:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 17:10:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 70 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 128 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 55 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 34/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 56/134 variables, 78/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 134/134 variables, and 190 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved in 705 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 34/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 56/134 variables, 78/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 55/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 134/134 variables, and 245 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved in 921 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1634ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1635ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1767 ms. Remains : 78/78 places, 56/56 transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10306779048634248855.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3887084832547782848.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10306779048634248855.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3887084832547782848.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.28e+11,0.143387,10216,2,216,5,29612,6,0,370,44255,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((p17==1)&&(p19==1)) U AG((((p74==1)||(!(((p61==1)&&(p71==1))&&(p65==1)))) + (A((p20!=1) U EX(((p43==1)&&(p50==1)))) * (((((p67==1)&&(p...291
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,((p17==1)&&(p19==1))) * !(E(TRUE U !((((p74==1)||(!(((p61==1)&&(p71==1))&&(p65==1)))) + (!((E(!(EX((...432
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,0.494977,23156,1,0,61,103543,29,38,1975,137867,48
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 78 /78 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 17:10:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 17:10:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 17:10:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 62 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 113 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 55 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 34/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 56/134 variables, 78/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 134/134 variables, and 190 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved in 752 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 34/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 56/134 variables, 78/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 55/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 134/134 variables, and 245 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved in 979 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1739ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1741ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1860 ms. Remains : 78/78 places, 56/56 transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14118006389062725085.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2710190465195954416.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14118006389062725085.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2710190465195954416.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.28e+11,0.136946,10224,2,216,5,29612,6,0,370,44255,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AF(EX((p72==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(EX((p72==0))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.154417,10224,1,0,7,29612,16,0,1840,44255,7
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 78 /78 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 17:10:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 17:10:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 17:10:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 69 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 125 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 55 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 34/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 56/134 variables, 78/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 134/134 variables, and 190 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved in 743 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 34/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 56/134 variables, 78/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 55/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 134/134 variables, and 245 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved in 849 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1599ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1600ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1730 ms. Remains : 78/78 places, 56/56 transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2934042159296839426.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5572846074199328602.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2934042159296839426.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5572846074199328602.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.28e+11,0.138197,10220,2,216,5,29612,6,0,370,44255,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EG(((AF(((p67==0)||(p69==0))) + ((p51==0)&&(p47==0))) + ((p5==0)||(p22==0)))) + (((p17==1)&&(p19==1)) * (AX(((p45==0)||(p60==0))) + (...178
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(((!(EG(!(((p67==0)||(p69==0))))) + ((p51==0)&&(p47==0))) + ((p5==0)||(p22==0)))))) * ...368
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,0.199859,10220,1,0,22,29612,32,10,1921,44255,13
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 78 /78 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 17:10:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 17:10:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 17:10:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 67 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 123 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 55 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 34/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 56/134 variables, 78/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 134/134 variables, and 190 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved in 737 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 34/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 56/134 variables, 78/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 55/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 134/134 variables, and 245 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved in 966 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1711ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1712ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1840 ms. Remains : 78/78 places, 56/56 transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11327119938714561366.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4433894613963046017.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11327119938714561366.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4433894613963046017.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.28e+11,0.14164,10224,2,216,5,29612,6,0,370,44255,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((EX(AF(EG((p0==1)))) + AX(A(EG(((p66==1)&&(p77==1))) U AF(((p16==1)&&(p27==1)))))) + E(!((((p15==1)&&(p49==1))||(((p36==1)&&(p46==1))...212
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY(EY(Init)) * !(EG(!(EG((p0==1))))))] != FALSE + [(EY(Init) * !(EX(!(!((E(!(!(EG(!(((p16==1)&&(p27==1))))))...431
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,0.249043,11544,1,0,15,44393,51,5,1967,45168,22
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 78 /78 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 17:10:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 17:10:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 17:10:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 57 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 121 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 55 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 34/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 56/134 variables, 78/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 134/134 variables, and 190 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved in 734 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 34/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 56/134 variables, 78/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 55/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 134/134 variables, and 245 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved in 958 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1700ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1702ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1827 ms. Remains : 78/78 places, 56/56 transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3910931451434852704.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability489824178893934558.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3910931451434852704.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability489824178893934558.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.28e+11,0.140771,10220,2,216,5,29612,6,0,370,44255,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EX(((((p17==0)||(p19==0))||((p11==0)||(p21==0))) + (EF(((p37==0)||(p39==0))) + (p26==0)))) + AG((A(((p17==1)&&(p19==1)) U ((p13==1)&&...234
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(((((p17==0)||(p19==0))||((p11==0)||(p21==0))) + (E(TRUE U ((p37==0)||(p39=...657
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.16557,10220,1,0,18,29612,44,5,1928,44255,16
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 78 /78 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 17:10:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 99 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 17:10:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 17:10:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 129 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 229 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 55 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 34/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 56/134 variables, 78/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 134/134 variables, and 190 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved in 780 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 34/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 56/134 variables, 78/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 55/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 134/134 variables, and 245 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved in 926 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1713ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1714ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1947 ms. Remains : 78/78 places, 56/56 transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9061664143960231796.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7931124256506838167.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9061664143960231796.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7931124256506838167.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.28e+11,0.14141,10216,2,216,5,29612,6,0,370,44255,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A((((p56==1)&&(p71==1)) * A(EF(((p7==1)&&(p9==1))) U EF(!(((p5==1)&&(p22==1)))))) U EF(((EX((((p31==1)&&(p46==1))||((p18==1)&&(p25==1))...211
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,!(E(TRUE U ((EX((((p31==1)&&(p46==1))||((p18==1)&&(p25==1)))) * !(EX(!(((p62==1)&&(p64==1)))))) * ...649
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.248841,11272,1,0,11,36019,29,3,1966,47333,14
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 78 /78 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 17:10:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 17:10:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 17:10:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 70 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 124 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 55 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 34/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 56/134 variables, 78/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 134/134 variables, and 190 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved in 747 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 34/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 56/134 variables, 78/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 55/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 134/134 variables, and 245 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved in 944 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1700ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1700ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1830 ms. Remains : 78/78 places, 56/56 transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3195321488303999548.gal : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18059083910336188721.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3195321488303999548.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18059083910336188721.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.28e+11,0.140076,10216,2,216,5,29612,6,0,370,44255,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG(AX(AF(AG(((p18==1)&&(p25==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(EX(!(!(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((p18==1)&&(p25==1))))))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.158286,10216,1,0,7,29612,22,0,1896,44255,9
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 78 /78 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 17:10:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 17:10:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 17:10:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 60 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 114 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 55 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 34/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 56/134 variables, 78/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 134/134 variables, and 190 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved in 758 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 34/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 56/134 variables, 78/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 55/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 134/134 variables, and 245 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved in 906 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1681ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1682ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1799 ms. Remains : 78/78 places, 56/56 transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16152803236697897292.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8541084305249758015.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16152803236697897292.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8541084305249758015.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.28e+11,0.143496,10216,2,216,5,29612,6,0,370,44255,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((A(((!(((p7==1)&&(p9==1))) + (AG(((p40==1)&&(p74==1))) * !(((p13==1)&&(p27==1))))) + (((AG(((p8==1)&&(p25==1))) * (p76==1)) * ((p7==1...509
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (((p15==1)&&(p49==1))||((p3==1)&&(p26==1)))) * !((E(!(!(E(!(EG(!((p49==1)))) U ((p70==1)...2637
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 50/0/6
(forward)formula 0,1,1.20512,52296,1,0,93,230601,70,67,2091,384394,88
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 78 /78 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 17:10:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 17:10:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 17:10:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 58 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 101 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 55 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 34/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 56/134 variables, 78/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 134/134 variables, and 190 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved in 721 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 34/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 56/134 variables, 78/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 55/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 134/134 variables, and 245 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved in 912 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1642ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1642ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1744 ms. Remains : 78/78 places, 56/56 transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4174615889254808995.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13710206793415079000.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4174615889254808995.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13710206793415079000.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.28e+11,0.138096,10220,2,216,5,29612,6,0,370,44255,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((AF(((A((p70==1) U (p65==1)) + A(((p56==1)&&(p71==1)) U ((p62==1)&&(p64==1)))) * AG((p26==1)))) * (p30==1)) * ((p47==1) * (((p42==1)&...362
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (!(EG(!(((!((E(!((p65==1)) U (!((p70==1)) * !((p65==1)))) + EG(!((p65==1))))) + !((E(!(((...840
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.158416,10220,1,0,12,29612,29,0,1908,44255,14
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 78 /78 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 17:10:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 17:10:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 17:10:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 63 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 116 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 55 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 34/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 56/134 variables, 78/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 134/134 variables, and 190 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved in 751 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 34/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 56/134 variables, 78/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 55/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 134/134 variables, and 245 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved in 945 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1705ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1707ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1824 ms. Remains : 78/78 places, 56/56 transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5060923425098650096.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6282650617041719029.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5060923425098650096.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6282650617041719029.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.28e+11,0.136747,10216,2,216,5,29612,6,0,370,44255,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EX(AX(AF(((p66==0)||(p77==0))))) + EG((!(A(((p29==1)&&(p48==1)) U EG((p47==1)))) * (E(AF(((p32==1)&&(p34==1))) U (((p30==1)&&(p47==1))|...272
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY(Init) * !(EX(!(!(EG(!(((p66==0)||(p77==0)))))))))] != FALSE + [FwdG(Init,(!(!((E(!(EG((p47==1))) U (!(((p...424
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 50/0/6
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,0.380517,18508,1,0,59,78218,64,35,1996,99656,49
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 78 /78 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 17:10:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 17:10:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 17:10:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 67 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 119 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 55 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 34/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 56/134 variables, 78/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 134/134 variables, and 190 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved in 758 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 34/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 56/134 variables, 78/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 55/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 134/134 variables, and 245 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved in 937 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1706ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1706ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1829 ms. Remains : 78/78 places, 56/56 transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
[2024-05-29 17:10:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4608459968249734337.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2381653155657153205.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4608459968249734337.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2381653155657153205.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.28e+11,0.140655,10220,2,216,5,29612,6,0,370,44255,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(EG((EX(((p4==0)||(p23==0))) * AF(((p67==1)&&(p69==1)))))) * EG((((AF(((p15==0)||(p49==0))) + AX(AX(((p37==1)&&(p39==1))))) + (EG(((p4...298
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * E(TRUE U EG((EX(((p4==0)||(p23==0))) * !(EG(!(((p67==1)&&(p69==1))))))))),(((!(EG(!(((p15==0)||(p4...446
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 53/0/3
(forward)formula 0,1,0.375549,17076,1,0,22,66908,65,9,2095,84663,33
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
[2024-05-29 17:10:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-29 17:10:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Total runtime 35898 ms.
BK_STOP 1717002651246
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldPPPt-PT-003A"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldPPPt-PT-003A, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r356-tall-171683761400562"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldPPPt-PT-003A.tgz
mv ShieldPPPt-PT-003A execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;