Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r356-tall-171683761300537.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldPPPt-PT-001B, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r356-tall-171683761300537
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 500K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.8K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 60K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.4K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 54K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K Apr 23 07:54 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K Apr 23 07:54 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K Apr 23 07:54 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Apr 23 07:54 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K Apr 11 14:39 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 131K Apr 11 14:39 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Apr 11 14:38 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 105K Apr 11 14:38 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Apr 23 07:54 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 23 07:54 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2023-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1717001256158

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldPPPt-PT-001B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-29 16:47:37] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-29 16:47:37] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-29 16:47:37] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 46 ms
[2024-05-29 16:47:37] [INFO ] Transformed 81 places.
[2024-05-29 16:47:37] [INFO ] Transformed 74 transitions.
[2024-05-29 16:47:37] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-29 16:47:37] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 81 places and 74 transitions and 184 arcs in 139 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 13 ms.
Support contains 59 out of 81 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 81/81 places, 74/74 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 16 ms. Remains 81 /81 variables (removed 0) and now considering 74/74 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 81 cols
[2024-05-29 16:47:37] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 14 ms
[2024-05-29 16:47:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 207 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 16:47:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 16:47:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 93 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 327 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 73 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 16:47:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 80/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/81 variables, 12/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 1/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 67 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:47:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:47:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 12/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:47:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:47:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 2/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 0/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 74/155 variables, 81/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 0/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 155/155 variables, and 188 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved in 2199 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 81/81 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 81/81 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 73/73 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 80/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/81 variables, 12/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 1/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 14/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:47:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 1/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:47:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 1/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 74/155 variables, 81/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 73/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:47:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:47:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 2/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 1/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 0/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 155/155 variables, and 267 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved in 4053 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 81/81 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 81/81 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 73/73 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints]
After SMT, in 6294ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6312ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6677 ms. Remains : 81/81 places, 74/74 transitions.
Support contains 59 out of 81 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-29 16:47:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2024-05-29 16:47:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-29 16:47:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 74 transitions.
Support contains 53 out of 81 places (down from 59) after GAL structural reductions.
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2024-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 52 to 49
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (9 resets) in 1019 ms. (39 steps per ms) remains 2/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (8 resets) in 213 ms. (186 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 138 ms. (287 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
[2024-05-29 16:47:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp22 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 61/66 variables, 10/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 61/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp31 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 66/155 variables, and 77 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved in 81 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 66/81 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/12 constraints, State Equation: 0/81 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 84ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 15 simplifications.
[2024-05-29 16:47:45] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2024-05-29 16:47:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-29 16:47:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 16:47:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 74 transitions.
Support contains 44 out of 81 places (down from 50) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 20 stabilizing places and 20 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 81/81 places, 74/74 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 71 transition count 64
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 71 transition count 64
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 70 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 70 transition count 63
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 69 transition count 62
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 69 transition count 62
Applied a total of 24 rules in 15 ms. Remains 69 /81 variables (removed 12) and now considering 62/74 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 62 rows 69 cols
[2024-05-29 16:47:45] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-29 16:47:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 16:47:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 16:47:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 50 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 95 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 61 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 16:47:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/69 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 6/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 62/131 variables, 69/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/131 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 131/131 variables, and 87 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved in 1127 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 69/69 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/69 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 6/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 62/131 variables, 69/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 61/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 3/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/131 variables, 1/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/131 variables, 1/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/131 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 131/131 variables, and 153 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved in 2673 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 69/69 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints]
After SMT, in 3809ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3811ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 69/81 places, 62/74 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3921 ms. Remains : 69/81 places, 62/74 transitions.
[2024-05-29 16:47:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-29 16:47:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 16:47:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 62 transitions.
[2024-05-29 16:47:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 16:47:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 16:47:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18306472023723830679.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 16:47:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5734267132707038237.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18306472023723830679.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5734267132707038237.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.8297e+06,0.190489,12144,2,1087,5,30906,6,0,340,56860,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(E((p48==1) U !((((p26==1) + EF((p49==1))) + !(EX(TRUE))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((FwdU(EY(Init),(p48==1)) * !(((p26==1) + E(TRUE U (p49==1)))))) * TRUE)] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t15, t19, t24, t28, t30, t34, t35, t38, t40, t41, t43, t44, t46, t47, t48, Intersec...244
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 60/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,0.759094,31528,1,0,157,136273,153,79,1906,166091,173
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2024-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 81/81 places, 74/74 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 21 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 21 transitions
Performed 21 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 21
Iterating post reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 80 transition count 52
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 59 transition count 50
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 58 transition count 50
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 58 transition count 46
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 54 transition count 46
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 47 transition count 39
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 47 transition count 39
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 47 transition count 36
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 44 transition count 36
Performed 14 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 14
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 30 transition count 22
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 29 transition count 21
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 28 transition count 21
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 28 transition count 19
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 26 transition count 19
Applied a total of 107 rules in 21 ms. Remains 26 /81 variables (removed 55) and now considering 19/74 (removed 55) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 19 rows 26 cols
[2024-05-29 16:47:49] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 16:47:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned [5, 9]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 32 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 24/81 places, 19/74 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 22 transition count 17
Applied a total of 4 rules in 2 ms. Remains 22 /24 variables (removed 2) and now considering 17/19 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 17 rows 22 cols
[2024-05-29 16:47:49] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-29 16:47:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 26 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 16:47:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 16:47:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 68 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 96 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 22/81 places, 17/74 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 151 ms. Remains : 22/81 places, 17/74 transitions.
[2024-05-29 16:47:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 16:47:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 16:47:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 17 transitions.
[2024-05-29 16:47:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 16:47:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 16:47:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18133221600737786566.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 16:47:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10403909011339354399.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18133221600737786566.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10403909011339354399.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2304,0.006432,3428,2,53,5,1350,6,0,108,1382,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG(AF((p62==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!((p62==0)))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 15/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,0.035619,5064,1,0,9,10117,26,6,561,8193,13
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2024-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 81/81 places, 74/74 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 73 transition count 66
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 73 transition count 66
Applied a total of 16 rules in 7 ms. Remains 73 /81 variables (removed 8) and now considering 66/74 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 66 rows 73 cols
[2024-05-29 16:47:50] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 16:47:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 16:47:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 16:47:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 55 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 115 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 65 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 16:47:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 8/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 66/139 variables, 73/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:47:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:47:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 2/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:47:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 1/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/139 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 139/139 variables, and 96 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved in 1686 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 65/65 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 11/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 66/139 variables, 73/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 65/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 4/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 2/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/139 variables, 0/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 139/139 variables, and 167 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved in 1970 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 65/65 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints]
After SMT, in 3667ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3668ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 73/81 places, 66/74 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3791 ms. Remains : 73/81 places, 66/74 transitions.
[2024-05-29 16:47:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 16:47:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 16:47:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 66 transitions.
[2024-05-29 16:47:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 16:47:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 16:47:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15787912621796219117.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 16:47:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2737579210567189090.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15787912621796219117.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2737579210567189090.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.06791e+07,0.373037,19388,2,1802,5,54671,6,0,360,102286,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!(((p26==0)||(p73==1))) U E(AG(E((p39!=1) U (p59!=0))) U (AX((p62==1)) * (p7==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E(!(E(TRUE U !(E((p39!=1) U (p59!=0))))) U (!(EX(!((p62==1)))) * (p7==1))))))) * !(E(!(E(!(E(TR...346
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t11, t12, t16, t21, t23, t26, t30, t34, t38, t39, t42, t44, t45, t47, t48, t50, t51,...259
(forward)formula 0,0,15.7681,470984,1,0,663,2.35091e+06,167,314,2044,3.57161e+06,708
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2024-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 81/81 places, 74/74 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 72 transition count 65
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 72 transition count 65
Applied a total of 18 rules in 4 ms. Remains 72 /81 variables (removed 9) and now considering 65/74 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 65 rows 72 cols
[2024-05-29 16:48:09] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 16:48:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 16:48:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 50 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 92 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 64 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 16:48:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/72 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 10/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 65/137 variables, 72/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/137 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 137/137 variables, and 94 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved in 1382 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 72/72 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 64/64 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/72 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 10/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 65/137 variables, 72/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 64/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 2/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/137 variables, 0/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 137/137 variables, and 160 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved in 1291 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 72/72 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 64/64 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints]
After SMT, in 2695ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2696ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 72/81 places, 65/74 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2792 ms. Remains : 72/81 places, 65/74 transitions.
[2024-05-29 16:48:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 65 transitions.
[2024-05-29 16:48:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11997448969325716808.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16072569186823381331.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11997448969325716808.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16072569186823381331.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.61179e+06,0.299264,16748,2,1463,5,45535,6,0,355,88521,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((EG((AF((p63==0)) * (EX(TRUE) + ((p4==1) * EF(((p31==0)||(p8==1))))))) + EX((((p46==1)||(p59==0))||(p4==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(EG((!(EG(!((p63==0)))) * (EX(TRUE) + ((p4==1) * E(TRUE U ((p31==0)||(p8==1))))))) + EX((((p46==1)||(...186
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t15, t20, t22, t25, t29, t34, t39, t41, t43, t44, t46, t47, t49, t50, t51, Intersec...244
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,15.0558,468284,1,0,1229,2.35135e+06,171,703,2099,3.43052e+06,1368
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2024-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 81/81 places, 74/74 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 73 transition count 66
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 73 transition count 66
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 72 transition count 65
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 72 transition count 65
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 71 transition count 64
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 71 transition count 64
Applied a total of 20 rules in 9 ms. Remains 71 /81 variables (removed 10) and now considering 64/74 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 71 cols
[2024-05-29 16:48:27] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 7 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 16:48:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 16:48:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 57 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 102 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 63 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 16:48:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/71 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:48:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:48:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:48:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:48:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:48:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:48:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:48:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 7/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 64/135 variables, 71/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:48:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 1/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:48:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 1/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 135/135 variables, and 92 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved in 1567 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/71 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 9/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 64/135 variables, 71/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 63/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:48:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:48:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 2/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 135/135 variables, and 157 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved in 1438 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints]
After SMT, in 3017ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3017ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 71/81 places, 64/74 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3129 ms. Remains : 71/81 places, 64/74 transitions.
[2024-05-29 16:48:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 64 transitions.
[2024-05-29 16:48:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7418939249312385554.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9510030930976623464.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7418939249312385554.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9510030930976623464.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.77034e+06,0.543839,26352,2,1488,5,75447,6,0,350,156269,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((((p20==1) * AG(EF((p44==1)))) + ((AG(((p80==0)||(p19==1))) * (p71==1)) * ((p20==0)||(p45==1)))) U EX(EG((p26==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(FwdU(Init,(((p20==1) * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U (p44==1)))))) + ((!(E(TRUE U !(((p80==0)||(p19==1))))) * (...210
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t12, t13, t14, t17, t21, t26, t30, t34, t36, t37, t39, t40, t42, t43, t45, t46, t48, t49,...259
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 62/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,6.63529,218864,1,0,331,1.08149e+06,168,144,2061,1.34392e+06,369
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2024-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 81/81 places, 74/74 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 21 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 21 transitions
Performed 21 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 21
Iterating post reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 80 transition count 52
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 59 transition count 52
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 59 transition count 48
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 55 transition count 48
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 49 transition count 42
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 49 transition count 42
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 49 transition count 39
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 46 transition count 39
Performed 14 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 14
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 32 transition count 25
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 31 transition count 24
Applied a total of 97 rules in 15 ms. Remains 31 /81 variables (removed 50) and now considering 24/74 (removed 50) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 24 rows 31 cols
[2024-05-29 16:48:37] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 16:48:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 16:48:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 40 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 68 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-29 16:48:37] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 22 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 16:48:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/31 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 24/55 variables, 31/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/55 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 55/55 variables, and 43 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved in 183 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 31/31 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/31 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 24/55 variables, 31/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 22/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/55 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 55/55 variables, and 65 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved in 172 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 31/31 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 368ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 369ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 31/81 places, 24/74 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 460 ms. Remains : 31/81 places, 24/74 transitions.
[2024-05-29 16:48:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 24 transitions.
[2024-05-29 16:48:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12139369085882286703.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7494284596451001572.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12139369085882286703.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7494284596451001572.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,38880,0.033417,5120,2,55,5,7327,6,0,151,10902,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((p17==0)&&(p38==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((p17==0)&&(p38==1))))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 20/0/4
(forward)formula 0,0,0.067221,5912,1,0,8,11163,20,4,728,17446,8
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2024-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 81/81 places, 74/74 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 22 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 22 transitions
Performed 22 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 22
Iterating post reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 80 transition count 51
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 58 transition count 49
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 57 transition count 49
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 57 transition count 46
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 54 transition count 46
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 48 transition count 40
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 48 transition count 40
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 48 transition count 37
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 45 transition count 37
Performed 15 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 15
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 30 transition count 22
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 29 transition count 21
Applied a total of 102 rules in 8 ms. Remains 29 /81 variables (removed 52) and now considering 21/74 (removed 53) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 21 rows 29 cols
[2024-05-29 16:48:38] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 16:48:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 16:48:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 37 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 66 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-29 16:48:38] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 19 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 16:48:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/29 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 21/50 variables, 29/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/50 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 50/50 variables, and 41 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved in 152 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 29/29 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/29 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 21/50 variables, 29/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 19/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/50 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 50/50 variables, and 60 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved in 142 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 29/29 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 298ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 298ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 29/81 places, 21/74 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 376 ms. Remains : 29/81 places, 21/74 transitions.
[2024-05-29 16:48:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 21 transitions.
[2024-05-29 16:48:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16067456259470230113.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2888349819591438778.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16067456259470230113.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2888349819591438778.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,21600,0.026604,4840,2,51,5,6306,6,0,140,9319,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AF((p37==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!((p37==1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 19/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,0.051981,5368,1,0,12,12335,24,6,675,11641,9
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2024-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 81/81 places, 74/74 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 70 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 70 transition count 63
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 69 transition count 62
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 69 transition count 62
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 68 transition count 61
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 68 transition count 61
Applied a total of 26 rules in 4 ms. Remains 68 /81 variables (removed 13) and now considering 61/74 (removed 13) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 61 rows 68 cols
[2024-05-29 16:48:38] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 16:48:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 16:48:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 46 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 75 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 60 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 16:48:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/68 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:48:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 6/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 61/129 variables, 68/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/129 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 129/129 variables, and 86 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved in 1066 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 68/68 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/68 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 6/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 1/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 61/129 variables, 68/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 60/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:48:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 1/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:48:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 1/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:48:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/129 variables, 1/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/129 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 129/129 variables, and 150 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved in 2284 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 68/68 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints]
After SMT, in 3356ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3357ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 68/81 places, 61/74 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3438 ms. Remains : 68/81 places, 61/74 transitions.
[2024-05-29 16:48:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 61 transitions.
[2024-05-29 16:48:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16573287782772131854.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12531558272416483881.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16573287782772131854.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12531558272416483881.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.77085e+06,0.183415,11956,2,1032,5,30101,6,0,335,54832,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(EX(((p75==0)||(p22==1))) U (p79==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,!((p79==1))) * !((p79==1))) * !(EX(((p75==0)||(p22==1)))))] != FALSE + [FwdG(Init,!((p79==1)))] !=...162
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t15, t19, t24, t28, t33, t34, t37, t39, t40, t42, t43, t45, t46, t47, Intersection ...239
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 58/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 58/0/3
(forward)formula 0,0,0.404635,17500,1,0,180,55064,155,69,1935,82116,181
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2024-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 81/81 places, 74/74 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 22 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 22 transitions
Performed 22 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 22
Iterating post reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 80 transition count 51
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 58 transition count 49
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 57 transition count 49
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 57 transition count 45
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 53 transition count 45
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 46 transition count 38
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 46 transition count 38
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 46 transition count 35
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 43 transition count 35
Performed 13 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 13
Deduced a syphon composed of 13 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 30 transition count 22
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 29 transition count 21
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 28 transition count 21
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 28 transition count 19
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 26 transition count 19
Applied a total of 107 rules in 17 ms. Remains 26 /81 variables (removed 55) and now considering 19/74 (removed 55) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 19 rows 26 cols
[2024-05-29 16:48:42] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned [6, 10]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 45 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 24/81 places, 19/74 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 22 transition count 17
Applied a total of 4 rules in 1 ms. Remains 22 /24 variables (removed 2) and now considering 17/19 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 17 rows 22 cols
[2024-05-29 16:48:42] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 21 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 16:48:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 16:48:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 27 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 51 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 22/81 places, 17/74 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 114 ms. Remains : 22/81 places, 17/74 transitions.
[2024-05-29 16:48:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 17 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 32 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (6 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2024-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2024-05-29 16:48:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16969269695625625328.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15086503429704084106.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16969269695625625328.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15086503429704084106.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 81/81 places, 74/74 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 70 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 70 transition count 63
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 69 transition count 62
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 69 transition count 62
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 68 transition count 61
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 68 transition count 61
Applied a total of 26 rules in 3 ms. Remains 68 /81 variables (removed 13) and now considering 61/74 (removed 13) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 61 rows 68 cols
[2024-05-29 16:48:42] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 16:48:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 16:48:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 63 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 93 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 60 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 16:48:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/68 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:48:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:48:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:48:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:48:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:48:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:48:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 6/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 61/129 variables, 68/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/129 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 129/129 variables, and 86 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved in 1021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 68/68 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/68 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 6/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:48:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 1/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 61/129 variables, 68/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 60/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:48:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 1/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:48:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 1/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:48:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/129 variables, 1/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/129 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 129/129 variables, and 150 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved in 2272 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 68/68 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints]
After SMT, in 3299ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3300ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 68/81 places, 61/74 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3396 ms. Remains : 68/81 places, 61/74 transitions.
[2024-05-29 16:48:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 61 transitions.
[2024-05-29 16:48:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15229861653930654457.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4031507807386892474.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15229861653930654457.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4031507807386892474.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.77085e+06,0.180172,11956,2,1032,5,30101,6,0,335,54832,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EX(A(EF((p63==0)) U EX((p17==1)))) * ((p43==0)||(p29==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((p43==0)||(p29==1)))) * !(EG(!(EX((p17==1)))))) * !(E(!(EX((p17==1))) U (!(E(TRUE U (p...195
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t15, t19, t24, t28, t33, t34, t37, t39, t40, t42, t43, t45, t46, t47, Intersection ...239
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,8.60381,303352,1,0,1024,1.63258e+06,153,621,1973,2.38744e+06,956
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2024-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 81/81 places, 74/74 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 20 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 20 transitions
Performed 20 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 20
Iterating post reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 80 transition count 53
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 60 transition count 51
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 59 transition count 50
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 58 transition count 50
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 58 transition count 46
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 54 transition count 46
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 47 transition count 39
Iterating global reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 47 transition count 39
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 47 transition count 36
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 44 transition count 36
Performed 14 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 14
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 30 transition count 22
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 29 transition count 21
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 28 transition count 21
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 28 transition count 19
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 26 transition count 19
Applied a total of 107 rules in 15 ms. Remains 26 /81 variables (removed 55) and now considering 19/74 (removed 55) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 19 rows 26 cols
[2024-05-29 16:48:54] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned [5, 9]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 29 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 24/81 places, 19/74 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 22 transition count 17
Applied a total of 4 rules in 1 ms. Remains 22 /24 variables (removed 2) and now considering 17/19 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 17 rows 22 cols
[2024-05-29 16:48:54] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 24 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 16:48:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 16:48:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 28 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 53 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 22/81 places, 17/74 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 98 ms. Remains : 22/81 places, 17/74 transitions.
[2024-05-29 16:48:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 0 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 17 transitions.
[2024-05-29 16:48:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14381309008699171328.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5968252035102940649.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14381309008699171328.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5968252035102940649.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2304,0.005829,3428,2,39,5,979,6,0,108,1064,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(AG(((p75==0)&&(p33==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(((p75==0)&&(p33==1)))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.040847,5592,1,0,53,10979,21,78,521,16862,85
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2024-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 81/81 places, 74/74 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 74 transition count 67
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 74 transition count 67
Applied a total of 14 rules in 1 ms. Remains 74 /81 variables (removed 7) and now considering 67/74 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 67 rows 74 cols
[2024-05-29 16:48:54] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 16:48:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 16:48:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 45 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 82 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 66 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 16:48:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/74 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:48:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:48:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:48:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:48:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:48:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:48:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 6/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 67/141 variables, 74/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:48:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 1/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/141 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 141/141 variables, and 93 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved in 1360 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 74/74 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 66/66 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/74 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 7/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:48:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:48:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:48:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 3/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 67/141 variables, 74/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 66/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:48:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:48:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:48:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 3/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:48:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/141 variables, 1/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/141 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 141/141 variables, and 166 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved in 2434 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 74/74 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 66/66 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints]
After SMT, in 3805ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3806ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 74/81 places, 67/74 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3890 ms. Remains : 74/81 places, 67/74 transitions.
[2024-05-29 16:48:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 67 transitions.
[2024-05-29 16:48:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3089704743141546036.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-29 16:48:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16813697898335267260.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3089704743141546036.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16813697898335267260.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.78944e+06,0.303335,17804,2,1734,5,49682,6,0,365,92645,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((E(((E((((p16==0)||(p20==1))||(p7==1)) U (p73==1)) * EX(((p69==0)||(p25==1)))) * ((((p40==0)||(p80==0))||(p56==1))&&(!((p19==0)||(p22=...246
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(E(((E((((p16==0)||(p20==1))||(p7==1)) U (p73==1)) * EX(((p69==0)||(p25==1)))) * ((((p40==0)||(p80==0...307
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t11, t13, t17, t21, t27, t31, t33, t36, t40, t43, t45, t46, t48, t49, t51, t52, t53, t55,...254
(forward)formula 0,0,7.47667,246308,1,0,432,1.17343e+06,175,206,2083,1.92522e+06,446
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 81/81 places, 74/74 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 71 transition count 64
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 71 transition count 64
Applied a total of 20 rules in 1 ms. Remains 71 /81 variables (removed 10) and now considering 64/74 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 71 cols
[2024-05-29 16:49:06] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 16:49:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 16:49:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 16:49:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 103 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 63 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 16:49:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/71 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:49:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:49:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:49:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:49:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:49:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:49:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:49:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 7/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:49:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:49:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:49:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:49:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 4/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:49:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 64/135 variables, 71/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 135/135 variables, and 95 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved in 1487 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/71 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 12/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 64/135 variables, 71/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 63/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:49:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:49:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 2/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:49:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 1/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 135/135 variables, and 161 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved in 1749 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints]
After SMT, in 3243ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3244ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 71/81 places, 64/74 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3351 ms. Remains : 71/81 places, 64/74 transitions.
[2024-05-29 16:49:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-29 16:49:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 16:49:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 64 transitions.
[2024-05-29 16:49:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 16:49:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 16:49:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2460510083254925335.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 16:49:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9553756677478447937.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2460510083254925335.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9553756677478447937.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.30025e+06,0.299591,16728,2,1433,5,45362,6,0,350,87132,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((E(((p40==1)&&((p32==0)||(p1==1))) U AG(((p43==0)||(p4==1)))) + AG(EX((p57==0)))) + (AX(((p66==0)&&(p42==1))) * ((p42==0)||((p0==0)&&...168
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((E(((p40==1)&&((p32==0)||(p1==1))) U !(E(TRUE U !(((p43==0)||(p4==1)))))) + !(E(TRUE ...395
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t15, t20, t22, t25, t29, t33, t37, t40, t42, t43, t45, t46, t48, t49, t50, t52, Int...249
(forward)formula 0,0,6.8022,209852,1,0,629,1.0768e+06,157,317,1962,1.35994e+06,653
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 81/81 places, 74/74 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 73 transition count 66
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 73 transition count 66
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 72 transition count 65
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 72 transition count 65
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 71 transition count 64
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 71 transition count 64
Applied a total of 20 rules in 5 ms. Remains 71 /81 variables (removed 10) and now considering 64/74 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 71 cols
[2024-05-29 16:49:16] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-29 16:49:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 16:49:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 16:49:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 44 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 81 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 63 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 16:49:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/71 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:49:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:49:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:49:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:49:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:49:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:49:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:49:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:49:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 8/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 64/135 variables, 71/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:49:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 1/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:49:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 1/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 135/135 variables, and 93 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved in 1502 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/71 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 10/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 1/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 64/135 variables, 71/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 63/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
[2024-05-29 16:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 16:49:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 3/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 135/135 variables, and 161 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved in 1781 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints]
After SMT, in 3290ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3291ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 71/81 places, 64/74 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3378 ms. Remains : 71/81 places, 64/74 transitions.
[2024-05-29 16:49:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-29 16:49:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 16:49:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 64 transitions.
[2024-05-29 16:49:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 16:49:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 16:49:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15969103997107663807.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-29 16:49:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4536779267753773048.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15969103997107663807.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4536779267753773048.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.91069e+06,0.477441,21472,2,1488,5,59628,6,0,350,118604,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(A(((A(((p59==1)&&((p44==0)||(p4==1))) U E((p73==1) U (p74==1))) * AF((((p20==0)||(p44==1))||((p62==0)||(p1==1))))) * ((p0==0)||(p42==1...182
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(EY(Init),!(EG(!(EX((p64==1)))))) * !(((!((E(!(E((p73==1) U (p74==1))) U (!(((p59==1)&&((p44==0)||(p4==1...391
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t11, t12, t16, t21, t23, t26, t30, t34, t36, t37, t39, t40, t42, t43, t45, t46, t48,...264
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,27.0526,765576,1,0,1740,3.66042e+06,156,1100,1982,6.41772e+06,1604
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2024-05-29 16:49:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-29 16:49:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Total runtime 129912 ms.

BK_STOP 1717001387302

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldPPPt-PT-001B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldPPPt-PT-001B, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r356-tall-171683761300537"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldPPPt-PT-001B.tgz
mv ShieldPPPt-PT-001B execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;