Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r356-tall-171683760900370.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldPPPs-PT-002A, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r356-tall-171683760900370
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 532K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.2K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 67K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.5K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 51K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K Apr 23 07:53 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K Apr 23 07:53 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K Apr 23 07:53 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Apr 23 07:53 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Apr 13 11:42 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 181K Apr 13 11:42 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.7K Apr 13 11:41 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 79K Apr 13 11:41 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Apr 23 07:53 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 23 07:53 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2023-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716951460174

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldPPPs-PT-002A
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-29 02:57:41] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-29 02:57:41] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-29 02:57:41] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 49 ms
[2024-05-29 02:57:41] [INFO ] Transformed 65 places.
[2024-05-29 02:57:41] [INFO ] Transformed 55 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:57:41] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-29 02:57:41] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 65 places and 55 transitions and 206 arcs in 145 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 15 ms.
Support contains 62 out of 65 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 65 /65 variables (removed 0) and now considering 55/55 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 55 rows 65 cols
[2024-05-29 02:57:41] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 15 ms
[2024-05-29 02:57:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 185 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 02:57:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 02:57:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 86 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 301 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 54 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:57:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 120/120 variables, and 153 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 927 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 54/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 120/120 variables, and 207 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 1647 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2617ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2632ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2966 ms. Remains : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Support contains 62 out of 65 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-29 02:57:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2024-05-29 02:57:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-29 02:57:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 55 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 67 to 56
RANDOM walk for 5990 steps (31 resets) in 500 ms. (11 steps per ms) remains 0/56 properties
[2024-05-29 02:57:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 02:57:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2024-05-29 02:57:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 55 transitions.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 64 transition count 54
Applied a total of 2 rules in 15 ms. Remains 64 /65 variables (removed 1) and now considering 54/55 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 54 rows 64 cols
[2024-05-29 02:57:45] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 02:57:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 116 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 02:57:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 02:57:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 82 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 201 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-29 02:57:45] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 53 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:57:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 63/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/64 variables, 23/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 1/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 54/118 variables, 64/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/118 variables, 0/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 118/118 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved in 790 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 64/64 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 53/53 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 63/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/64 variables, 23/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 1/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 54/118 variables, 64/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 53/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
[2024-05-29 02:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 1/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/118 variables, 0/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 118/118 variables, and 205 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved in 1393 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 64/64 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 53/53 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 2202ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2205ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 64/65 places, 54/55 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2430 ms. Remains : 64/65 places, 54/55 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:57:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-29 02:57:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 02:57:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 54 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:57:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-29 02:57:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 02:57:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12048956750706800531.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 02:57:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14591224594104801401.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12048956750706800531.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14591224594104801401.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.45198e+09,4.83656,140440,2,3981,5,494101,6,0,312,1.01475e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG(((AG(((p38==0)||(p40==0))) + (p31==0)) + ((AG(((p47==0)||(p64==0))) * (p27==0)) * ((p63==0)&&((p1==0)||(p26==0)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(((!(E(TRUE U !(((p38==0)||(p40==0))))) + (p31==0)) + ((!(E(TRUE U !(((p47==0)||(p64==0))))) * (p...210
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t23, t25, t31, t33, t36...295
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-29 02:58:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 02:58:17] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-29 02:58:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15617044274337361961.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15617044274337361961.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15617044274337361961.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15617044274337361961.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15617044274337361961.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-29 02:58:17] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-29 02:58:17] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-29 02:58:17] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:58:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 258 ms
[2024-05-29 02:58:18] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 30 labels/synchronizations in 15 ms.
[2024-05-29 02:58:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8584255041228192487.gal : 13 ms
[2024-05-29 02:58:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9563124661758580714.ctl : 11 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8584255041228192487.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9563124661758580714.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.45198e+09,2.04118,57892,693,30,92907,131,181,220461,33,598,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG(((AG(((i6.u13.p38==0)||(i5.i0.u14.p40==0))) + (i1.u11.p31==0)) + ((AG(((i5.i1.u17.p47==0)||(i4.i0.u22.p64==0))) * (i3.u10.p27==0)) ...215
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(((!(E(TRUE U !(((i6.u13.p38==0)||(i5.i0.u14.p40==0))))) + (i1.u11.p31==0)) + ((!(E(TRUE U !(((i5...284
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t9, t10, t34, i0.t42, i0.t41, i0.u8.t3, i0.u8.t4, i1.t48, i1.t46, i1.u11.t7, i1.u...431
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 63 transition count 53
Applied a total of 4 rules in 9 ms. Remains 63 /65 variables (removed 2) and now considering 53/55 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 53 rows 63 cols
[2024-05-29 02:58:48] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 02:58:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 02:58:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 02:58:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 74 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 129 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-29 02:58:48] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 52 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:58:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 62/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/63 variables, 23/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 1/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 53/116 variables, 63/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
[2024-05-29 02:58:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/116 variables, 1/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/116 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 116/116 variables, and 150 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved in 1011 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 63/63 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 63/63 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 62/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/63 variables, 23/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 1/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 1/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 53/116 variables, 63/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 52/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
[2024-05-29 02:58:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/116 variables, 1/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/116 variables, 0/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 116/116 variables, and 203 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved in 2099 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 63/63 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 63/63 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 3122ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3123ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/65 places, 53/55 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3267 ms. Remains : 63/65 places, 53/55 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:58:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-29 02:58:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 02:58:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 53 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:58:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 02:58:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 02:58:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5743280847635471010.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 02:58:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10013402704478077218.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5743280847635471010.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10013402704478077218.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.15977e+09,5.60041,138244,2,3831,5,484736,6,0,307,999390,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((p39==0)||(p60==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((p39==0)||(p60==0)))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 47/0/6
(forward)formula 0,1,9.67123,200812,1,0,58,791621,19,4,1599,1.37335e+06,55
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2024-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 65 /65 variables (removed 0) and now considering 55/55 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 55 rows 65 cols
[2024-05-29 02:59:01] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-29 02:59:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 02:59:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 02:59:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 63 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 125 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 54 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:59:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 120/120 variables, and 153 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 705 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 54/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 120/120 variables, and 207 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 918 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1630ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1631ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1758 ms. Remains : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:59:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 02:59:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 02:59:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 55 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:59:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 02:59:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 02:59:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7048382583108428877.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 02:59:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability137284024025039269.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7048382583108428877.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability137284024025039269.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,0.851964,34940,2,4966,5,115151,6,0,317,199556,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(!(AG(((p42==1)&&(p54==1)))) U !(A((AF((p27==1)) + E(((p11==1)&&(p23==1)) U ((p38==1)&&(p40==1)))) U ((!(((p49==1)&&(p58==1))) + EF((p3...241
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(E(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((p42==1)&&(p54==1)))))) U !(!((E(!(((!(((p49==1)&&(p58==1))) + E(TRUE U (p32=...483
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t20, t26, t28...300
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-29 02:59:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-29 02:59:33] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-29 02:59:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12482368882513810435.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12482368882513810435.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12482368882513810435.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12482368882513810435.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12482368882513810435.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-29 02:59:33] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-29 02:59:33] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-29 02:59:33] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:59:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-29 02:59:33] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 30 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2024-05-29 02:59:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8846104964466827419.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 02:59:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7481395629419547056.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8846104964466827419.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7481395629419547056.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,2.26619,57400,692,29,83492,138,173,203868,31,592,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(!(AG(((i5.u15.p42==1)&&(i5.u19.p54==1)))) U !(A((AF((i2.u10.p27==1)) + E(((i0.u4.p11==1)&&(i0.u8.p23==1)) U ((i5.u13.p38==1)&&(i4.i1.u...358
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(E(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((i5.u15.p42==1)&&(i5.u19.p54==1)))))) U !(!((E(!(((!(((i4.i0.u18.p49==1)&&(i4...668
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t9, t10, t39, i0.t45, i0.t44, i0.u8.t3, i0.u8.t4, i2.t41, i2.t40, i2.u10.t5, i2.u...443
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 65 /65 variables (removed 0) and now considering 55/55 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:00:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 03:00:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 03:00:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 03:00:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 69 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 157 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 54 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:00:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 120/120 variables, and 153 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 704 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 54/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 120/120 variables, and 207 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 880 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1609ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1609ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1776 ms. Remains : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:00:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 03:00:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 03:00:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 55 transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:00:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 03:00:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 03:00:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17465988722606080889.gal : 28 ms
[2024-05-29 03:00:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17238625952904325043.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17465988722606080889.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17238625952904325043.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,1.00497,34956,2,4966,5,115151,6,0,317,199556,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AF((AX((p22==1)) + ((p44==1)&&(p64==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),!((!(EX(!((p22==1)))) + ((p44==1)&&(p64==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t20, t26, t28...300
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-29 03:00:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-29 03:00:35] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-29 03:00:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9181029940615376752.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9181029940615376752.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9181029940615376752.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9181029940615376752.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9181029940615376752.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-29 03:00:35] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-29 03:00:35] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-29 03:00:35] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:00:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 03:00:35] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 30 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-29 03:00:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14492053895523935320.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 03:00:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3171549276725076402.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14492053895523935320.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3171549276725076402.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,1.55776,50540,741,31,78030,136,170,197730,31,608,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AF((AX((i2.u8.p22==1)) + ((i6.i1.u16.p44==1)&&(i6.i1.u22.p64==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),!((!(EX(!((i2.u8.p22==1)))) + ((i6.i1.u16.p44==1)&&(i6.i1.u22.p64==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t9, t10, t39, i1.t41, i1.t40, i1.u10.t5, i1.u10.t6, i2.t45, i2.t44, i2.u8.t3, i2....443
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 64 transition count 54
Applied a total of 2 rules in 10 ms. Remains 64 /65 variables (removed 1) and now considering 54/55 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 54 rows 64 cols
[2024-05-29 03:01:05] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 03:01:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 03:01:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 03:01:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 108 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-29 03:01:05] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 53 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:01:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 63/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/64 variables, 23/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 1/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 54/118 variables, 64/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/118 variables, 0/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 118/118 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved in 664 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 64/64 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 53/53 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 63/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/64 variables, 23/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 1/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 54/118 variables, 64/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 53/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
[2024-05-29 03:01:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 1/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/118 variables, 0/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 118/118 variables, and 205 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved in 1347 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 64/64 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 53/53 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 2020ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2021ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 64/65 places, 54/55 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2150 ms. Remains : 64/65 places, 54/55 transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:01:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-29 03:01:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 03:01:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 54 transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:01:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 03:01:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 03:01:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15767738014579123145.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 03:01:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16674705466644586317.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15767738014579123145.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16674705466644586317.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.45198e+09,5.52087,140524,2,3981,5,494101,6,0,312,1.01475e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((AF(((p7==1)&&(p9==1))) * (EG(!(E((p53==1) U (p46==1)))) + AG(((p2==0)||(p10==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(EG(!(((p7==1)&&(p9==1))))) * (EG(!(E((p53==1) U (p46==1)))) + !(E(TRUE U !(((p2==0)||(p10==0))))...169
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t23, t25, t31, t33, t36...295
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-29 03:01:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-29 03:01:37] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-29 03:01:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12289667273739043315.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12289667273739043315.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12289667273739043315.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12289667273739043315.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12289667273739043315.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-29 03:01:37] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-29 03:01:37] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-29 03:01:37] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:01:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 03:01:37] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 30 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2024-05-29 03:01:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16317337356561291516.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 03:01:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12485830484706815180.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16317337356561291516.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12485830484706815180.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.45198e+09,1.73773,46312,643,30,70381,197,178,167308,33,1113,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((AF(((i1.u2.p7==1)&&(i2.u3.p9==1))) * (EG(!(E((i5.u19.p53==1) U (i6.i0.u17.p46==1)))) + AG(((i2.u0.p2==0)||(i1.u4.p10==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(EG(!(((i1.u2.p7==1)&&(i2.u3.p9==1))))) * (EG(!(E((i5.u19.p53==1) U (i6.i0.u17.p46==1)))) + !(E(T...210
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t9, t10, t34, i1.t42, i1.t41, i1.u8.t3, i1.u8.t4, i2.t36, i2.t35, i2.u10.t5, i2.u...431
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 65 /65 variables (removed 0) and now considering 55/55 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 55 rows 65 cols
[2024-05-29 03:02:07] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 03:02:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 03:02:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 03:02:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 118 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 54 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:02:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 120/120 variables, and 153 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 658 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 54/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 120/120 variables, and 207 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 896 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1564ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1565ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1688 ms. Remains : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:02:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-29 03:02:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 03:02:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 55 transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:02:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 03:02:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 03:02:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7297352892766668626.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-29 03:02:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11936964234457716179.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7297352892766668626.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11936964234457716179.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,0.917957,34932,2,4966,5,115151,6,0,317,199556,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((AG(((A((((p11==1)&&(p21==1))&&((p16==1)&&(p31==1))) U !(((p37==1)&&(p54==1)))) * (p4==1)) * (p25==1))) * EF((EF((p52==1)) * ((p32==1...412
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((!(E(TRUE U !(((!((E(!(!(((p37==1)&&(p54==1)))) U (!((((p11==1)&&(p21==1))&&((p16==1)&&(p31==1))))...574
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t20, t26, t28...300
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-29 03:02:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 03:02:39] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-29 03:02:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7833756367605426327.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7833756367605426327.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7833756367605426327.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7833756367605426327.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7833756367605426327.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-29 03:02:39] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-29 03:02:39] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-29 03:02:39] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:02:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-29 03:02:39] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 30 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-29 03:02:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17122014164174451255.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 03:02:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability92841886644975978.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17122014164174451255.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability92841886644975978.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,1.35647,41820,694,31,59481,155,178,165583,31,640,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((AG(((A((((i2.u4.p11==1)&&(i2.u8.p21==1))&&((i1.u6.p16==1)&&(i1.u11.p31==1))) U !(((i4.u13.p37==1)&&(i4.u19.p54==1)))) * (i0.u1.p4==1...631
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((!(E(TRUE U !(((!((E(!(!(((i4.u13.p37==1)&&(i4.u19.p54==1)))) U (!((((i2.u4.p11==1)&&(i2.u8.p21==1...821
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t9, t10, t39, i1.t54, i1.t53, i1.u11.t7, i1.u11.t8, i2.t45, i2.t44, i2.u8.t3, i2....443
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,26.1666,549760,1,0,830963,230,1038,1.78417e+06,132,708,678875
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2024-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 63 transition count 53
Applied a total of 4 rules in 5 ms. Remains 63 /65 variables (removed 2) and now considering 53/55 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 53 rows 63 cols
[2024-05-29 03:03:05] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-29 03:03:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 03:03:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 03:03:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 112 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-29 03:03:05] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 52 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:03:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 62/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/63 variables, 23/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 1/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 53/116 variables, 63/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
[2024-05-29 03:03:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/116 variables, 1/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/116 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 116/116 variables, and 150 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved in 958 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 63/63 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 63/63 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 62/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/63 variables, 23/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 1/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 1/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 53/116 variables, 63/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 52/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
[2024-05-29 03:03:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/116 variables, 1/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/116 variables, 0/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 116/116 variables, and 203 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved in 2074 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 63/63 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 63/63 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 3040ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3041ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/65 places, 53/55 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3166 ms. Remains : 63/65 places, 53/55 transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:03:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 03:03:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 03:03:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 53 transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:03:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 03:03:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 03:03:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9870197097724892491.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 03:03:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7668239410714758686.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9870197097724892491.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7668239410714758686.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.15977e+09,4.61067,138376,2,3831,5,484736,6,0,307,999390,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG((((EF(((p15==1)&&(p57==1))) + (p11==0)) + ((p21==0)||((p6==1)&&(p22==1)))) + ((p18==1)&&(p27==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !((((E(TRUE U ((p15==1)&&(p57==1))) + (p11==0)) + ((p21==0)||((p6==1)&&(p22==1)))) + ((p...187
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t20, t22, t28, t30, t33, t35...295
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-29 03:03:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-29 03:03:38] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-29 03:03:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13389155862241076285.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13389155862241076285.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13389155862241076285.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13389155862241076285.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13389155862241076285.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-29 03:03:38] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-29 03:03:38] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-29 03:03:38] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:03:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 03:03:38] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 24 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-29 03:03:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5533075186656111169.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 03:03:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3986696185684465427.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5533075186656111169.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3986696185684465427.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.15977e+09,1.43109,43636,606,31,66240,232,154,149039,33,1123,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG((((EF(((i0.u6.p15==1)&&(i6.u21.p57==1))) + (i1.u4.p11==0)) + ((i1.u8.p21==0)||((i1.u2.p6==1)&&(i1.u8.p22==1)))) + ((i3.u7.p18==1)&&...174
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !((((E(TRUE U ((i0.u6.p15==1)&&(i6.u21.p57==1))) + (i1.u4.p11==0)) + ((i1.u8.p21==0)||((...237
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t9, t10, t47, i0.t46, i0.t45, i0.u11.t7, i0.u11.t8, i1.t39, i1.t38, i1.u8.t3, i1....410
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 65 /65 variables (removed 0) and now considering 55/55 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 55 rows 65 cols
[2024-05-29 03:04:08] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 03:04:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 03:04:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 03:04:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 121 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 54 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:04:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 120/120 variables, and 153 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 632 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 54/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 120/120 variables, and 207 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 912 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1554ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1554ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1679 ms. Remains : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:04:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 03:04:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 03:04:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 55 transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:04:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 03:04:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 03:04:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14240631099581484012.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 03:04:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12247806107205406298.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14240631099581484012.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12247806107205406298.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,0.997463,34936,2,4966,5,115151,6,0,317,199556,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(((p8==1)&&(p29==1))) + EX(((p49==1)&&(p58==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(EX(((p49==1)&&(p58==1))))),!(((p8==1)&&(p29==1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t20, t26, t28...300
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 49/0/6
(forward)formula 0,0,7.49514,185316,1,0,212,943429,137,64,2164,1.09868e+06,178
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2024-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 63 transition count 53
Applied a total of 4 rules in 11 ms. Remains 63 /65 variables (removed 2) and now considering 53/55 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 53 rows 63 cols
[2024-05-29 03:04:18] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 03:04:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 03:04:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 03:04:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 57 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 106 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-29 03:04:18] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 52 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:04:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 62/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/63 variables, 23/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 1/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 53/116 variables, 63/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
[2024-05-29 03:04:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/116 variables, 1/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/116 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 116/116 variables, and 150 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved in 916 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 63/63 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 63/63 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 62/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/63 variables, 23/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 1/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 1/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 53/116 variables, 63/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 52/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
[2024-05-29 03:04:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/116 variables, 1/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/116 variables, 0/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 116/116 variables, and 203 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved in 2095 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 63/63 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 63/63 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 3024ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3024ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/65 places, 53/55 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3146 ms. Remains : 63/65 places, 53/55 transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:04:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-29 03:04:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 03:04:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 53 transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:04:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 03:04:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 03:04:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14868906239930847634.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 03:04:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7561464435586314115.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14868906239930847634.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7561464435586314115.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.15977e+09,4.67878,138072,2,3831,5,484736,6,0,307,999390,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(((p4==1)&&(p25==1))) * AF(((p43==1)&&(p45==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(TRUE U ((p4==1)&&(p25==1)))))] = FALSE * [FwdG(Init,!(((p43==1)&&(p45==1))))] = FALSE)
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 48/0/5
(forward)formula 0,0,13.2796,357276,1,0,57,1.56929e+06,20,3,1602,2.71173e+06,55
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2024-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 65 /65 variables (removed 0) and now considering 55/55 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 55 rows 65 cols
[2024-05-29 03:04:34] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 03:04:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 03:04:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 03:04:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 51 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 99 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 54 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:04:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 120/120 variables, and 153 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 617 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 54/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 120/120 variables, and 207 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 909 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1534ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1535ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1637 ms. Remains : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:04:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 03:04:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 03:04:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 55 transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:04:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 03:04:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 03:04:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability104627031684018304.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 03:04:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5357876681499381847.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability104627031684018304.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5357876681499381847.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,0.821856,34948,2,4966,5,115151,6,0,317,199556,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(((((EX(EF((p58==0))) + EX((((p8==0)||(p28==0))&&((p12==0)||(p14==0))))) * (AG(((p47==0)||(p64==0))) + AF(((p13==0)||(p32==0))))) * ((...319
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG((FwdU((Init * E(TRUE U ((((EX(E(TRUE U (p58==0))) + EX((((p8==0)||(p28==0))&&((p12==0)||(p14==0))))) * (...1013
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t20, t26, t28...300
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-29 03:05:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 03:05:06] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-29 03:05:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4919440131468064725.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4919440131468064725.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4919440131468064725.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4919440131468064725.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4919440131468064725.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-29 03:05:06] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-29 03:05:06] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-29 03:05:06] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:05:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 03:05:06] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 24 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-29 03:05:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17839198160420104065.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 03:05:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17374350160691790376.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17839198160420104065.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17374350160691790376.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,2.30424,61332,668,31,102384,206,151,212411,31,1077,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(((((EX(EF((i5.u21.p58==0))) + EX((((i2.u3.p8==0)||(i2.u10.p28==0))&&((i0.u4.p12==0)||(i1.u5.p14==0))))) * (AG(((i7.u17.p47==0)||(i7.u...464
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG((FwdU((Init * E(TRUE U ((((EX(E(TRUE U (i5.u21.p58==0))) + EX((((i2.u3.p8==0)||(i2.u10.p28==0))&&((i0.u4...1392
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t9, t10, t11, i0.t45, i0.t44, i0.u8.t3, i0.u8.t4, i1.t54, i1.t53, i1.u11.t7, i1.u...422
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 65 /65 variables (removed 0) and now considering 55/55 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:05:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 03:05:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 03:05:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 03:05:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 66 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 122 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 54 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:05:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 120/120 variables, and 153 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 655 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 54/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 120/120 variables, and 207 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 930 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1596ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1596ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1723 ms. Remains : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:05:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 03:05:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 03:05:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 55 transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:05:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 03:05:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 03:05:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6502381876048542345.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 03:05:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability309490256845594697.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6502381876048542345.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability309490256845594697.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,1.01304,34916,2,4966,5,115151,6,0,317,199556,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EX(EF(EX(((p38==1)&&(p40==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,EX(E(TRUE U EX(((p38==1)&&(p40==1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t20, t26, t28...300
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-29 03:06:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 03:06:08] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-29 03:06:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4601331737067644690.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4601331737067644690.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4601331737067644690.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4601331737067644690.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4601331737067644690.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-29 03:06:08] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-29 03:06:08] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-29 03:06:08] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:06:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 03:06:08] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 30 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-29 03:06:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11492206903542965596.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 03:06:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5237156192605554090.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11492206903542965596.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5237156192605554090.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,2.02366,55820,661,31,83082,166,183,186836,31,949,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EX(EF(EX(((i5.u13.p38==1)&&(i6.i0.u14.p40==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,EX(E(TRUE U EX(((i5.u13.p38==1)&&(i6.i0.u14.p40==1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t9, t10, t39, i0.t45, i0.t44, i0.u8.t3, i0.u8.t4, i2.t41, i2.t40, i2.u10.t5, i2.u...443
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 64 transition count 54
Applied a total of 2 rules in 7 ms. Remains 64 /65 variables (removed 1) and now considering 54/55 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 54 rows 64 cols
[2024-05-29 03:06:38] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-29 03:06:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 03:06:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 03:06:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 57 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 110 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-29 03:06:38] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 53 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:06:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 63/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/64 variables, 23/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 1/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 54/118 variables, 64/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/118 variables, 0/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 118/118 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved in 628 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 64/64 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 53/53 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 63/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/64 variables, 23/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 1/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 54/118 variables, 64/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 53/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
[2024-05-29 03:06:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 1/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/118 variables, 0/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 118/118 variables, and 205 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved in 1370 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 64/64 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 53/53 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 2008ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2009ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 64/65 places, 54/55 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2132 ms. Remains : 64/65 places, 54/55 transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:06:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 03:06:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 03:06:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 54 transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:06:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 03:06:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 03:06:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2111435379955586852.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-29 03:06:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12200692652554832409.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2111435379955586852.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12200692652554832409.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.45198e+09,5.74579,140640,2,3981,5,494101,6,0,312,1.01475e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((EF(((((p6==1)&&(p23==1))||((p15==1)&&(p57==1))) * E((p53==1) U ((p49==1)&&(p60==1))))) * !(A(((p35==1)&&(p56==1)) U EF((p62==1))))) ...316
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((E(TRUE U ((((p6==1)&&(p23==1))||((p15==1)&&(p57==1))) * E((p53==1) U ((p49==1)&&(p60==1))))) * !(...557
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t23, t25, t31, t33, t36...295
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-29 03:07:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-29 03:07:10] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-29 03:07:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14742547525204036149.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14742547525204036149.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14742547525204036149.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14742547525204036149.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14742547525204036149.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-29 03:07:10] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-29 03:07:10] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-29 03:07:10] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:07:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 03:07:10] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 30 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-29 03:07:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18115874008907889058.gal : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 03:07:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3542887756874898947.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18115874008907889058.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3542887756874898947.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.45198e+09,2.28834,60040,781,31,91603,155,188,238104,33,659,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((EF(((((i3.u2.p6==1)&&(i3.u8.p23==1))||((i2.u6.p15==1)&&(i5.i0.u21.p57==1))) * E((i4.u19.p53==1) U ((i5.i1.u18.p49==1)&&(i5.i0.u21.p6...489
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((E(TRUE U ((((i3.u2.p6==1)&&(i3.u8.p23==1))||((i2.u6.p15==1)&&(i5.i0.u21.p57==1))) * E((i4.u19.p53...790
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t9, t10, t34, i1.t36, i1.t35, i1.u10.t5, i1.u10.t6, i2.t48, i2.t46, i2.u11.t7, i2...431
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 65 /65 variables (removed 0) and now considering 55/55 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 55 rows 65 cols
[2024-05-29 03:07:40] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-29 03:07:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 03:07:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 03:07:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 57 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 116 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 54 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:07:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 120/120 variables, and 153 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 678 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 54/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 120/120 variables, and 207 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 901 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1603ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1604ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1725 ms. Remains : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:07:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 03:07:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 03:07:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 55 transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:07:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 03:07:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 03:07:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3274492347138503965.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 03:07:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12325428944534105756.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3274492347138503965.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12325428944534105756.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,0.885458,34956,2,4966,5,115151,6,0,317,199556,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EG((((p1==0)||(p26==0))&&(p53==0))) + ((AG((((p49==1)&&(p58==1))&&((p6==1)&&(p23==1)))) * AX((p58==1))) * !(A(((p39==1)&&(p59==1)) U ...180
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),(((p1==0)||(p26==0))&&(p53==0)))] != FALSE + ([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (!(E(TRUE U !((((...459
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 45/10/10
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-29 03:08:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 03:08:12] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-29 03:08:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10409009467110777721.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10409009467110777721.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10409009467110777721.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10409009467110777721.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10409009467110777721.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-29 03:08:12] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-29 03:08:12] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-29 03:08:12] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:08:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 03:08:12] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 30 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-29 03:08:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16731695563650797720.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 03:08:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5133107499026456850.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16731695563650797720.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5133107499026456850.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,1.3495,44200,692,31,71981,152,179,158980,31,651,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EG((((i0.u0.p1==0)||(i0.u10.p26==0))&&(i4.u19.p53==0))) + ((AG((((i5.i0.u18.p49==1)&&(i5.i1.u21.p58==1))&&((i2.u2.p6==1)&&(i2.u8.p23=...279
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),(((i0.u0.p1==0)||(i0.u10.p26==0))&&(i4.u19.p53==0)))] != FALSE + ([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE)...634
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 65 /65 variables (removed 0) and now considering 55/55 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:08:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 03:08:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 03:08:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 03:08:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 73 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 132 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 54 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:08:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 120/120 variables, and 153 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 658 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 54/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 120/120 variables, and 207 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 861 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1533ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1535ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1671 ms. Remains : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:08:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 03:08:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 03:08:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 55 transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:08:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 03:08:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 03:08:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8240211119946306225.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 03:08:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17349496675731844345.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8240211119946306225.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17349496675731844345.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,0.81896,34944,2,4966,5,115151,6,0,317,199556,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG((AF(((p31==0)||(p63==0))) + AX((((p52==1)||(p28==1))||(((p5==1)&&(p24==1))&&((p20==1)&&(p41==1))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),(!(EG(!(((p31==0)||(p63==0))))) + !(EX(!((((p52==1)||(p28==1))||(((p5==1)&&(p24==1))&&((p2...188
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t20, t26, t28...300
(forward)formula 0,1,15.5379,415220,1,0,470,2.52231e+06,137,170,2175,2.9859e+06,503
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 65 /65 variables (removed 0) and now considering 55/55 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:08:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 03:08:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 03:08:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 03:08:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 52 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 96 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 54 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:08:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 120/120 variables, and 153 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 672 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 54/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 120/120 variables, and 207 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 849 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1541ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1542ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1644 ms. Remains : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:09:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 03:09:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 03:09:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 55 transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:09:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 03:09:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 03:09:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8565493927547305514.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 03:09:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6350552574498458259.ctl : 7 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8565493927547305514.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6350552574498458259.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,0.778687,34960,2,4966,5,115151,6,0,317,199556,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(((AX(((p12==1)&&(p14==1))) * AF((p46==0))) * (!(E(AG(((p18==1)&&(p27==1))) U EF(((p12==1)&&(p14==1))))) * ((((p15==1)&&(p57==1))||((p...374
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU((Init * !(!(EG(!(((!(EX(!(((p12==1)&&(p14==1))))) * !(EG(!((p46==0))))) * (!(E(!(E(TRUE U !(((p18==1)&&(...752
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t20, t26, t28...300
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-29 03:09:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 03:09:31] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-29 03:09:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph994247347184085914.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph994247347184085914.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph994247347184085914.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph994247347184085914.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph994247347184085914.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-29 03:09:31] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-29 03:09:31] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-29 03:09:31] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:09:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 03:09:31] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 30 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-29 03:09:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6623337309707924117.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 03:09:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15904662167707683240.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6623337309707924117.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15904662167707683240.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,3.00146,74824,653,31,112385,250,174,261890,31,1536,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(((AX(((i0.u4.p12==1)&&(i3.u5.p14==1))) * AF((i5.i0.u17.p46==0))) * (!(E(AG(((i2.u7.p18==1)&&(i2.u10.p27==1))) U EF(((i0.u4.p12==1)&&(...551
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU((Init * !(!(EG(!(((!(EX(!(((i0.u4.p12==1)&&(i3.u5.p14==1))))) * !(EG(!((i5.i0.u17.p46==0))))) * (!(E(!(E...1051
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t9, t10, t39, i0.t45, i0.t44, i0.u8.t3, i0.u8.t4, i2.t41, i2.t40, i2.u10.t5, i2.u...443
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 65 /65 variables (removed 0) and now considering 55/55 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:10:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 03:10:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 03:10:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 03:10:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 56 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 105 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 54 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:10:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 120/120 variables, and 153 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 640 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 54/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 120/120 variables, and 207 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 864 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1513ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1514ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1620 ms. Remains : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:10:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 03:10:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 03:10:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 55 transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:10:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 03:10:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 03:10:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14089553931862636441.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 03:10:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15124849018120280778.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14089553931862636441.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15124849018120280778.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,0.815053,34936,2,4966,5,115151,6,0,317,199556,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EG(EX(EF(!(((p44==1)&&(p63==1)))))) U ((AG((((p18==1)&&(p27==1))&&(!((p53==1)||(p58==1))))) * !(EX((((!((p15==1)&&(p57==1)))||((p42==1)...398
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((FwdU(Init,EG(EX(E(TRUE U !(((p44==1)&&(p63==1))))))) * (!(E(TRUE U !((((p18==1)&&(p27==1))&&(!((p53==1)||(p...1440
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t20, t26, t28...300
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-29 03:10:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 03:10:33] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-29 03:10:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1602223870808481907.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1602223870808481907.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1602223870808481907.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1602223870808481907.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1602223870808481907.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-29 03:10:33] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-29 03:10:33] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-29 03:10:33] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:10:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 03:10:33] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 30 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-29 03:10:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4411193789347675900.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 03:10:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14943126649464654525.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4411193789347675900.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14943126649464654525.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,1.79531,48956,704,31,81114,264,174,162606,31,1543,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EG(EX(EF(!(((i5.i0.u16.p44==1)&&(i5.i0.u22.p63==1)))))) U ((AG((((i0.u7.p18==1)&&(i0.u10.p27==1))&&(!((i6.u19.p53==1)||(i4.i0.u21.p58==...608
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((FwdU(Init,EG(EX(E(TRUE U !(((i5.i0.u16.p44==1)&&(i5.i0.u22.p63==1))))))) * (!(E(TRUE U !((((i0.u7.p18==1)&&...2122
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t9, t10, t39, i0.t41, i0.t40, i0.u10.t5, i0.u10.t6, i1.t45, i1.t44, i1.u8.t3, i1....443
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,26.3714,503052,1,0,750265,264,875,1.34645e+06,124,1543,590863
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2024-05-29 03:10:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 03:10:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 03:10:59] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-29 03:10:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4636114265880823701.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4636114265880823701.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4636114265880823701.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4636114265880823701.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4636114265880823701.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-29 03:10:59] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-29 03:10:59] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-29 03:10:59] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:10:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 03:10:59] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 30 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-29 03:10:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13871672725463144132.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 03:10:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11659879082805693825.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13871672725463144132.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11659879082805693825.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 10 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,1.5895,47632,723,31,77971,148,182,163331,31,643,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG(((AG(((i4.u13.p38==0)||(i5.i0.u14.p40==0))) + (i1.u11.p31==0)) + ((AG(((i5.i1.u18.p47==0)||(i6.i1.u22.p64==0))) * (i0.u10.p27==0)) ...215
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(((!(E(TRUE U !(((i4.u13.p38==0)||(i5.i0.u14.p40==0))))) + (i1.u11.p31==0)) + ((!(E(TRUE U !(((i5...284
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t9, t10, t39, i0.t41, i0.t40, i0.u10.t5, i0.u10.t6, i1.t54, i1.t53, i1.u11.t7, i1...443
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,136.599,1956528,1,0,2.2754e+06,179,840,5.26915e+06,121,643,1721215
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2024-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: (E(!(AG(((i4.u15.p42==1)&&(i4.u19.p54==1)))) U !(A((AF((i0.u10.p27==1)) + E(((i2.u4.p11==1)&&(i2.u8.p23==1)) U ((i4.u13.p38==1)&&(i5.i0.u...358
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(E(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((i4.u15.p42==1)&&(i4.u19.p54==1)))))) U !(!((E(!(((!(((i5.i1.u17.p49==1)&&(i5...668
(forward)formula 1,1,453.633,3290396,1,0,3.99889e+06,179,453,9.56674e+06,78,643,246479
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2024-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: AX(AF((AX((i2.u8.p22==1)) + ((i6.i1.u16.p44==1)&&(i6.i1.u22.p64==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),!((!(EX(!((i2.u8.p22==1)))) + ((i6.i1.u16.p44==1)&&(i6.i1.u22.p64==1)))))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 2,0,501.63,3290396,1,0,3.99889e+06,179,523,9.56674e+06,83,643,1402103
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2024-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: AF((AF(((i2.u2.p7==1)&&(i0.u3.p9==1))) * (EG(!(E((i4.u19.p53==1) U (i5.i1.u17.p46==1)))) + AG(((i0.u0.p2==0)||(i2.u4.p10==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(EG(!(((i2.u2.p7==1)&&(i0.u3.p9==1))))) * (EG(!(E((i4.u19.p53==1) U (i5.i1.u17.p46==1)))) + !(E(T...210
(forward)formula 3,0,1136.9,4472548,1,0,5.30872e+06,179,356,1.06451e+07,73,643,2287108
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2024-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-29 03:35:26] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-29 03:35:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 03:35:26] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-29 03:35:26] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-29 03:35:26] [INFO ] Removed a total of 18 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:35:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 03:35:26] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 24 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-29 03:35:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14026533494159043802.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 03:35:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1844758423264930366.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14026533494159043802.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1844758423264930366.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 6 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,0.85233,38092,658,28,65678,113,141,136539,29,261,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG((((EF(((i4.u34.p15==1)&&(u28.p57==1))) + (i3.u7.p11==0)) + ((u12.p21==0)||((i2.u4.p6==1)&&(u12.p22==1)))) + ((i4.u11.p18==1)&&(u14....166
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !((((E(TRUE U ((i4.u34.p15==1)&&(u28.p57==1))) + (i3.u7.p11==0)) + ((u12.p21==0)||((i2.u...229
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t27, t28, t30, t36, t38, t40, t41, t44, t45, t51, t52, u12.t3, u12.t4, u14.t5, u14.t6, u15.t7...373
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,325.182,3005492,1,0,5.31623e+06,163,533,1.24087e+07,97,322,4153625
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2024-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: (EF(((((EX(EF((u28.p58==0))) + EX((((i2.u5.p8==0)||(u14.p28==0))&&((i3.u7.p12==0)||(i3.u8.p14==0))))) * (AG(((i12.u24.p47==0)||(u29.p64==...440
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG((FwdU((Init * E(TRUE U ((((EX(E(TRUE U (u28.p58==0))) + EX((((i2.u5.p8==0)||(u14.p28==0))&&((i3.u7.p12==...1328
(forward)formula 1,1,347.309,3005492,1,0,5.31623e+06,166,767,1.24087e+07,110,340,6286056
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2024-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: EG(EX(EF(EX(((i10.u18.p38==1)&&(i10.u19.p40==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,EX(E(TRUE U EX(((i10.u18.p38==1)&&(i10.u19.p40==1))))))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 2,1,357.623,3121916,1,0,5.67811e+06,166,774,1.32369e+07,110,340,7160166
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2024-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: AF(((EF(((((i2.u4.p6==1)&&(u12.p23==1))||((i4.u34.p15==1)&&(u28.p57==1))) * E((u26.p53==1) U ((i12.u25.p49==1)&&(u28.p60==1))))) * !(A(((...431
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((E(TRUE U ((((i2.u4.p6==1)&&(u12.p23==1))||((i4.u34.p15==1)&&(u28.p57==1))) * E((u26.p53==1) U ((i...704
(forward)formula 3,0,423.611,3317924,1,0,6.01132e+06,169,420,1.40804e+07,77,343,3120188
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2024-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: EF((EG((((u1.p1==0)||(u14.p26==0))&&(u26.p53==0))) + ((AG((((i12.u25.p49==1)&&(u28.p58==1))&&((i2.u4.p6==1)&&(u12.p23==1)))) * AX((u28.p5...245
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),(((u1.p1==0)||(u14.p26==0))&&(u26.p53==0)))] != FALSE + ([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (!(E(T...582
(forward)formula 4,1,433.075,3317924,1,0,6.01132e+06,169,541,1.40804e+07,83,343,3905183
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: (AF(((AX(((i3.u7.p12==1)&&(i3.u8.p14==1))) * AF((i12.u36.p46==0))) * (!(E(AG(((i4.u11.p18==1)&&(u14.p27==1))) U EF(((i3.u7.p12==1)&&(i3.u...502
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU((Init * !(!(EG(!(((!(EX(!(((i3.u7.p12==1)&&(i3.u8.p14==1))))) * !(EG(!((i12.u36.p46==0))))) * (!(E(!(E(T...958
(forward)formula 5,0,675.773,4017788,1,0,6.70219e+06,169,462,1.85924e+07,77,343,3977232
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Total runtime 2941212 ms.

BK_STOP 1716954402569

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldPPPs-PT-002A"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldPPPs-PT-002A, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r356-tall-171683760900370"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldPPPs-PT-002A.tgz
mv ShieldPPPs-PT-002A execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;