Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r356-tall-171683760900369.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldPPPs-PT-002A, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r356-tall-171683760900369
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 532K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.2K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 67K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.5K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 51K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K Apr 23 07:53 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K Apr 23 07:53 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K Apr 23 07:53 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Apr 23 07:53 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Apr 13 11:42 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 181K Apr 13 11:42 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.7K Apr 13 11:41 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 79K Apr 13 11:41 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Apr 23 07:53 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 23 07:53 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLCardinality-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLCardinality-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLCardinality-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLCardinality-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLCardinality-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLCardinality-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLCardinality-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLCardinality-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLCardinality-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLCardinality-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLCardinality-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLCardinality-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLCardinality-2023-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716951446164

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldPPPs-PT-002A
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-29 02:57:27] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-29 02:57:27] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-29 02:57:27] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 48 ms
[2024-05-29 02:57:27] [INFO ] Transformed 65 places.
[2024-05-29 02:57:27] [INFO ] Transformed 55 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:57:27] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-29 02:57:27] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 65 places and 55 transitions and 206 arcs in 145 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 16 ms.
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLCardinality-2024-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLCardinality-2024-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLCardinality-2024-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 43 out of 65 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 16 ms. Remains 65 /65 variables (removed 0) and now considering 55/55 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 55 rows 65 cols
[2024-05-29 02:57:27] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 7 ms
[2024-05-29 02:57:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 201 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 02:57:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 02:57:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 86 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 316 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 54 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:57:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 120/120 variables, and 153 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 846 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 54/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 120/120 variables, and 207 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 950 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1847ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1859ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2210 ms. Remains : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Support contains 43 out of 65 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-29 02:57:29] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 2 formulas.
[2024-05-29 02:57:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLCardinality-2024-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLCardinality-2024-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-29 02:57:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-29 02:57:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 55 transitions.
Support contains 33 out of 65 places (down from 43) after GAL structural reductions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 28 to 27
RANDOM walk for 600 steps (1 resets) in 42 ms. (13 steps per ms) remains 0/27 properties
[2024-05-29 02:57:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 02:57:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 02:57:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 55 transitions.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 65 /65 variables (removed 0) and now considering 55/55 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:57:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 02:57:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 02:57:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 02:57:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 60 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 110 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 54 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:57:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 120/120 variables, and 153 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 695 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 54/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 120/120 variables, and 207 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 887 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1595ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1597ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1708 ms. Remains : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:57:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-29 02:57:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 02:57:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 55 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:57:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 02:57:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 02:57:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1571065962080679011.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 02:57:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10881538671325936727.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1571065962080679011.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10881538671325936727.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,0.842804,34868,2,4966,5,115151,6,0,317,199556,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AG(((AF(!(E((p22==1) U (p0==1)))) + ((A((p56==1) U (p51==0)) * (p37==0)) * ((p24==1)&&((p11==1)||(p6==0))))) + (AX((p29==1)) * AX((p49...164
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY((FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * !((!(EG(!(!(E((p22==1) U (p0==1)))))) + ((!((E(!((p51==0)) U (!((p56==1)) * !((p51=...472
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t20, t26, t28...300
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-29 02:58:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 02:58:01] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-29 02:58:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17668740099825282975.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17668740099825282975.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17668740099825282975.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17668740099825282975.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17668740099825282975.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-29 02:58:01] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-29 02:58:01] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-29 02:58:01] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:58:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2024-05-29 02:58:01] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 30 labels/synchronizations in 13 ms.
[2024-05-29 02:58:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12690619937600168006.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 02:58:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12530155669708917447.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12690619937600168006.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12530155669708917447.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,2.82004,70312,728,31,105556,259,176,246527,31,1540,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AG(((AF(!(E((i1.u8.p22==1) U (i2.u0.p0==1)))) + ((A((i5.i0.u20.p56==1) U (i6.u19.p51==0)) * (i6.u13.p37==0)) * ((i0.u9.p24==1)&&((i1.u...235
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY((FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * !((!(EG(!(!(E((i1.u8.p22==1) U (i2.u0.p0==1)))))) + ((!((E(!((i6.u19.p51==0)) U (!(...625
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t9, t10, t39, i1.t45, i1.t44, i1.u8.t3, i1.u8.t4, i2.t41, i2.t40, i2.u10.t5, i2.u...443
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 63 transition count 53
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 62 transition count 52
Applied a total of 4 rules in 24 ms. Remains 62 /65 variables (removed 3) and now considering 52/55 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 52 rows 62 cols
[2024-05-29 02:58:32] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 02:58:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 75 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 02:58:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 02:58:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 103 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 180 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-29 02:58:32] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 50 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:58:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 62/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 23/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 52/114 variables, 62/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/114 variables, 0/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 114/114 variables, and 147 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved in 530 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 62/62 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 62/62 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 62/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 23/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 52/114 variables, 62/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 50/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/114 variables, 0/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 114/114 variables, and 197 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved in 850 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 62/62 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 62/62 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1391ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1392ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 62/65 places, 52/55 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1605 ms. Remains : 62/65 places, 52/55 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:58:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 02:58:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 02:58:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 52 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:58:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 02:58:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 02:58:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9482133491945866115.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 02:58:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality704418404337582171.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9482133491945866115.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality704418404337582171.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.15977e+09,0.983922,34236,2,3380,5,111389,6,0,303,210064,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((p39==0))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(p39==0))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 49/0/3
(forward)formula 0,0,7.34097,201300,1,0,55,904589,19,3,1530,1.40269e+06,54
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLCardinality-2024-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 65 /65 variables (removed 0) and now considering 55/55 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 55 rows 65 cols
[2024-05-29 02:58:41] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 02:58:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 84 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 02:58:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 02:58:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 69 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 172 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-29 02:58:41] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 54 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:58:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 120/120 variables, and 153 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 666 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 54/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 120/120 variables, and 207 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 879 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1554ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1556ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1737 ms. Remains : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:58:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-29 02:58:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 02:58:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 55 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:58:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 02:58:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 02:58:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8495217158364197056.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 02:58:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5484597179605359913.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8495217158364197056.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5484597179605359913.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,0.919542,34948,2,4966,5,115151,6,0,317,199556,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(EF(((EG((((p61==0)||(p46==0))||(p44==1))) * ((!((p46==0)||(p8==1)))||(p50!=1))) * ((p46==0)||(p49==1))))) U !(AG(AF((p54!=0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(FwdU(Init,!(E(TRUE U ((EG((((p61==0)||(p46==0))||(p44==1))) * ((!((p46==0)||(p8==1)))||(p50!=1))) * (...207
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t20, t26, t28...300
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-29 02:59:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 02:59:12] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-29 02:59:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5592431109036280528.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5592431109036280528.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5592431109036280528.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5592431109036280528.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5592431109036280528.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-29 02:59:12] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-29 02:59:12] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-29 02:59:12] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:59:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2024-05-29 02:59:13] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 36 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2024-05-29 02:59:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6990596613819464360.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 02:59:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16083236859979579761.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6990596613819464360.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16083236859979579761.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,1.16725,38144,610,31,59835,198,187,130518,31,1122,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(EF(((EG((((i4.i1.u22.p61==0)||(i6.i0.u17.p46==0))||(i4.i1.u16.p44==1))) * ((!((i6.i0.u17.p46==0)||(i1.u3.p8==1)))||(i6.i0.u18.p50!=1)...233
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(FwdU(Init,!(E(TRUE U ((EG((((i4.i1.u22.p61==0)||(i6.i0.u17.p46==0))||(i4.i1.u16.p44==1))) * ((!((i6.i...290
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t2, t9, t10, t39, t47, t53, i0.t45, i0.u8.t3, i0.u8.t4, i1.t41, i1.t40, i1.u10.t5, i1.u10...449
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 65 /65 variables (removed 0) and now considering 55/55 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:59:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 02:59:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 02:59:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 02:59:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 67 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 121 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 54 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:59:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 120/120 variables, and 153 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 665 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 54/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 120/120 variables, and 207 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 896 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1575ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1576ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1703 ms. Remains : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:59:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 02:59:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 02:59:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 55 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:59:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 02:59:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 02:59:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13371157220726689337.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 02:59:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13333336007710207144.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13371157220726689337.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13333336007710207144.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,0.956558,34924,2,4966,5,115151,6,0,317,199556,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EX(TRUE))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(TRUE)))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t20, t26, t28...300
(forward)formula 0,1,2.77624,72788,1,0,206,430444,131,61,2082,398962,173
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLCardinality-2024-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 63 transition count 53
Applied a total of 4 rules in 8 ms. Remains 63 /65 variables (removed 2) and now considering 53/55 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 53 rows 63 cols
[2024-05-29 02:59:47] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 02:59:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 02:59:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 02:59:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 70 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 116 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-29 02:59:47] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 52 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:59:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 62/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/63 variables, 23/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 1/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 53/116 variables, 63/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
[2024-05-29 02:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/116 variables, 1/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/116 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 116/116 variables, and 150 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved in 994 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 63/63 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 63/63 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 62/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/63 variables, 23/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 1/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 1/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 53/116 variables, 63/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 52/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
[2024-05-29 02:59:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/116 variables, 1/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/116 variables, 0/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 116/116 variables, and 203 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved in 2085 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 63/63 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 63/63 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 3091ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3092ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/65 places, 53/55 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3221 ms. Remains : 63/65 places, 53/55 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:59:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 02:59:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 02:59:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 53 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:59:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 02:59:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 02:59:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13621200956506720779.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 02:59:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17394090853576249668.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13621200956506720779.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17394090853576249668.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.15977e+09,4.9593,138104,2,3831,5,484736,6,0,307,999390,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG(EF((p36==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(E(TRUE U (p36==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t20, t22, t28, t30, t33, t35...295
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-29 03:00:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-29 03:00:20] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-29 03:00:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16721797004482741513.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16721797004482741513.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16721797004482741513.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16721797004482741513.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16721797004482741513.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-29 03:00:20] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-29 03:00:20] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-29 03:00:20] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:00:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 03:00:20] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 24 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-29 03:00:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14898598527097563426.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 03:00:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17731444151679065944.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14898598527097563426.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17731444151679065944.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.15977e+09,1.54863,48648,643,31,76739,229,152,175292,33,1147,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG(EF((i4.u13.p36==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(E(TRUE U (i4.u13.p36==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t9, t10, t47, i1.t34, i1.t32, i1.u10.t5, i1.u10.t6, i2.t39, i2.t38, i2.u8.t3, i2....410
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 63 transition count 53
Applied a total of 4 rules in 10 ms. Remains 63 /65 variables (removed 2) and now considering 53/55 (removed 2) transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:00:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 03:00:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 03:00:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 03:00:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 78 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 135 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-29 03:00:51] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 52 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:00:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 62/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/63 variables, 23/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 1/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 53/116 variables, 63/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
[2024-05-29 03:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/116 variables, 1/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/116 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 116/116 variables, and 150 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved in 983 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 63/63 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 63/63 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 62/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/63 variables, 23/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 1/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 1/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 53/116 variables, 63/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 52/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
[2024-05-29 03:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/116 variables, 1/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/116 variables, 0/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 116/116 variables, and 203 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved in 2140 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 63/63 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 63/63 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 3133ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3133ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/65 places, 53/55 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3283 ms. Remains : 63/65 places, 53/55 transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:00:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-29 03:00:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 03:00:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 53 transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:00:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 03:00:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 03:00:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12067664740574914389.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 03:00:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality800306038611504597.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12067664740574914389.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality800306038611504597.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.15977e+09,4.75726,138248,2,3831,5,484736,6,0,307,999390,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(A(AF((p0!=1)) U AG(!(AF((p1==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(!(E(TRUE U !(!(!(EG(!((p1==1)))))))))) * !(!(EG(!((p0!=1)))))),TRUE) * !(EG(!((p...248
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t20, t22, t28, t30, t33, t35...295
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-29 03:01:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-29 03:01:24] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-29 03:01:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14021616125893572601.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14021616125893572601.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14021616125893572601.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14021616125893572601.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14021616125893572601.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-29 03:01:24] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-29 03:01:24] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-29 03:01:24] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:01:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 03:01:24] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 24 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-29 03:01:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3342517757015790393.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 03:01:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12639641817211558921.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3342517757015790393.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12639641817211558921.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.15977e+09,2.30817,60000,603,30,94955,235,157,200661,33,1119,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(A(AF((i0.u9.p0!=1)) U AG(!(AF((i2.u0.p1==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(!(E(TRUE U !(!(!(EG(!((i2.u0.p1==1)))))))))) * !(!(EG(!((i0.u9.p0!=1)))))),TRUE)...272
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t9, t10, t47, i1.t39, i1.t38, i1.u8.t3, i1.u8.t4, i2.t34, i2.t32, i2.u10.t5, i2.u...410
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 63 transition count 53
Applied a total of 4 rules in 4 ms. Remains 63 /65 variables (removed 2) and now considering 53/55 (removed 2) transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:01:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 03:01:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 03:01:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 03:01:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 56 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 104 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-29 03:01:54] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 52 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:01:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 62/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/63 variables, 23/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 1/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 53/116 variables, 63/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
[2024-05-29 03:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/116 variables, 1/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/116 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 116/116 variables, and 150 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved in 879 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 63/63 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 63/63 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 62/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/63 variables, 23/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 1/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 1/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 53/116 variables, 63/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 52/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
[2024-05-29 03:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/116 variables, 1/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/116 variables, 0/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 116/116 variables, and 203 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved in 2064 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 63/63 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 63/63 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 2953ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2955ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/65 places, 53/55 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3069 ms. Remains : 63/65 places, 53/55 transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:01:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 03:01:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 03:01:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 53 transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:01:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 03:01:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 03:01:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6795267230160227908.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 03:01:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3163852633510552040.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6795267230160227908.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3163852633510552040.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.15977e+09,4.34845,138244,2,3831,5,484736,6,0,307,999390,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((p57==0)||(p33==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((p57==0)||(p33==1)))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 44/0/9
(forward)formula 0,1,20.213,562568,1,0,58,1.98426e+06,19,4,1598,4.29308e+06,55
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLCardinality-2024-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 63 transition count 53
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 62 transition count 52
Applied a total of 4 rules in 6 ms. Remains 62 /65 variables (removed 3) and now considering 52/55 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 52 rows 62 cols
[2024-05-29 03:02:17] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-29 03:02:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 03:02:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 03:02:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 62 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 108 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-29 03:02:18] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 50 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:02:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 62/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 23/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 52/114 variables, 62/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/114 variables, 0/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 114/114 variables, and 147 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved in 486 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 62/62 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 62/62 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 62/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 23/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 52/114 variables, 62/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 50/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/114 variables, 0/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 114/114 variables, and 197 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved in 886 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 62/62 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 62/62 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1379ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1380ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 62/65 places, 52/55 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1498 ms. Remains : 62/65 places, 52/55 transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:02:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-29 03:02:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 03:02:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 52 transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:02:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 03:02:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 03:02:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16154594573680625947.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 03:02:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15420693402429699564.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16154594573680625947.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15420693402429699564.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.15977e+09,0.828511,34232,2,3380,5,111389,6,0,303,210064,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(((p11==0)||(p4==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((p11==0)||(p4==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t20, t22, t28, t30, t33, t35...295
(forward)formula 0,0,1.58214,45148,1,0,168,247598,125,69,1887,257073,142
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLCardinality-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 63 transition count 53
Applied a total of 4 rules in 14 ms. Remains 63 /65 variables (removed 2) and now considering 53/55 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 53 rows 63 cols
[2024-05-29 03:02:21] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 03:02:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 03:02:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 03:02:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 53 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 92 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-29 03:02:21] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 52 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:02:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 62/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/63 variables, 23/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 1/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 53/116 variables, 63/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
[2024-05-29 03:02:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/116 variables, 1/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/116 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 116/116 variables, and 150 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved in 934 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 63/63 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 63/63 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 62/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/63 variables, 23/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 1/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 1/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 53/116 variables, 63/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 52/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
[2024-05-29 03:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/116 variables, 1/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/116 variables, 0/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 116/116 variables, and 203 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved in 2011 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 63/63 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 63/63 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 2960ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2961ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/65 places, 53/55 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3071 ms. Remains : 63/65 places, 53/55 transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:02:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 03:02:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 03:02:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 53 transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:02:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 03:02:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 03:02:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1756852148947890635.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 03:02:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5083693625455903777.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1756852148947890635.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5083693625455903777.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.15977e+09,4.6454,138104,2,3831,5,484736,6,0,307,999390,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((EG(((p56==0)||(p43==1))) * ((p6==1) + EF(AG(A((p63==1) U (p63==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((EG(((p56==0)||(p43==1))) * ((p6==1) + E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!((p63==1)) U (!((p63==1)) * !((p...201
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t20, t22, t28, t30, t33, t35...295
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-29 03:02:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 03:02:54] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-29 03:02:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph942316027131839337.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph942316027131839337.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph942316027131839337.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph942316027131839337.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph942316027131839337.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-29 03:02:54] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-29 03:02:54] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-29 03:02:54] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:02:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 03:02:54] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 24 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-29 03:02:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17084180211506029920.gal : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 03:02:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1449834294305091941.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17084180211506029920.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1449834294305091941.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.15977e+09,1.15413,40464,592,31,70527,229,158,121612,33,1167,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((EG(((i4.u20.p56==0)||(i6.u15.p43==1))) * ((i2.u2.p6==1) + EF(AG(A((i5.u22.p63==1) U (i5.u22.p63==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((EG(((i4.u20.p56==0)||(i6.u15.p43==1))) * ((i2.u2.p6==1) + E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!((i5.u22.p63...249
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t9, t10, t47, i0.t34, i0.t32, i0.u10.t5, i0.u10.t6, i1.t46, i1.t45, i1.u11.t7, i1...410
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 65 /65 variables (removed 0) and now considering 55/55 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 55 rows 65 cols
[2024-05-29 03:03:24] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 03:03:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 03:03:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 03:03:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 51 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 92 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 54 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:03:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 120/120 variables, and 153 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 711 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 54/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 120/120 variables, and 207 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 886 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1605ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1606ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1704 ms. Remains : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:03:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 03:03:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 03:03:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 55 transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:03:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 03:03:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 03:03:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17967383779273027898.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-29 03:03:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2181784299899185521.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17967383779273027898.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2181784299899185521.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,0.855993,34908,2,4966,5,115151,6,0,317,199556,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((((EG((((p9==1)||(p48==0))||(p56==1))) * EG(EX(((p11==1)||(p54==1))))) * (EG((p1==0)) * ((p4==0)||(p25==1)))) * (((p13==0) + EX(TRUE))...181
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((EG((((p9==1)||(p48==0))||(p56==1))) * EG(EX(((p11==1)||(p54==1))))) * (EG((p1==0)) * ((...521
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t20, t26, t28...300
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-29 03:03:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 03:03:56] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-29 03:03:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12718545301268817873.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12718545301268817873.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12718545301268817873.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12718545301268817873.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12718545301268817873.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-29 03:03:56] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-29 03:03:56] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-29 03:03:56] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:03:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 03:03:56] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 30 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2024-05-29 03:03:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15146671816426599870.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 03:03:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality961978074047862230.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15146671816426599870.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality961978074047862230.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,2.03479,58716,669,30,85533,137,179,220671,31,599,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((((EG((((i2.u3.p9==1)||(i5.i1.u17.p48==0))||(i6.i0.u20.p56==1))) * EG(EX(((i1.u4.p11==1)||(i4.u19.p54==1))))) * (EG((i2.u0.p1==0)) * (...264
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((EG((((i2.u3.p9==1)||(i5.i1.u17.p48==0))||(i6.i0.u20.p56==1))) * EG(EX(((i1.u4.p11==1)||...718
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t9, t10, t39, i1.t45, i1.t44, i1.u8.t3, i1.u8.t4, i2.t41, i2.t40, i2.u10.t5, i2.u...443
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 65 /65 variables (removed 0) and now considering 55/55 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:04:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 03:04:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 03:04:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 03:04:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 108 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 54 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:04:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 120/120 variables, and 153 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 644 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 54/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 120/120 variables, and 207 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 867 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1521ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1523ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1635 ms. Remains : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:04:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 03:04:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 03:04:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 55 transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:04:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 03:04:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 03:04:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7827355664449955084.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-29 03:04:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6425695416937065695.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7827355664449955084.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6425695416937065695.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,0.84872,34948,2,4966,5,115151,6,0,317,199556,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!(AF(E(EF((p59==1)) U (EF((p16==1)) + (p40!=1))))) U A(EF(((p58==0)||(p46==1))) U (EX(EG((p56==1))) + !((((p8==0)||(p33==0))||(p0==1)))...158
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((E(!((EX(EG((p56==1))) + !((((p8==0)||(p33==0))||(p0==1))))) U (!(E(TRUE U ((p58==0)||(p46==1...850
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t20, t26, t28...300
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-29 03:04:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 03:04:57] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-29 03:04:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1560141568575260103.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1560141568575260103.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1560141568575260103.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1560141568575260103.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1560141568575260103.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-29 03:04:57] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-29 03:04:57] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-29 03:04:57] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:04:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 03:04:57] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 30 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-29 03:04:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11373921513727160770.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 03:04:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12628212486013662148.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11373921513727160770.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12628212486013662148.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,1.48524,41560,651,31,60788,140,173,161812,31,610,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!(AF(E(EF((i5.i1.u21.p59==1)) U (EF((i0.u6.p16==1)) + (i5.i1.u14.p40!=1))))) U A(EF(((i5.i1.u21.p58==0)||(i5.i0.u17.p46==1))) U (EX(EG(...233
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((E(!((EX(EG((i6.i0.u20.p56==1))) + !((((i3.u3.p8==0)||(i0.u11.p33==0))||(i3.u0.p0==1))))) U (...1197
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t9, t10, t39, i0.t54, i0.t53, i0.u11.t7, i0.u11.t8, i1.t45, i1.t44, i1.u8.t3, i1....443
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-29 03:05:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-29 03:05:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 03:05:27] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-29 03:05:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8369735977631872705.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8369735977631872705.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8369735977631872705.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8369735977631872705.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8369735977631872705.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-29 03:05:27] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-29 03:05:27] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-29 03:05:27] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:05:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 03:05:27] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 30 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-29 03:05:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5611058823516643154.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 03:05:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13810561026383455898.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5611058823516643154.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13810561026383455898.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 7 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,2.2598,60836,685,31,91748,264,176,212595,31,1520,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AG(((AF(!(E((i1.u8.p22==1) U (i2.u0.p0==1)))) + ((A((i4.i0.u20.p56==1) U (i6.u19.p51==0)) * (i6.u13.p37==0)) * ((i0.u9.p24==1)&&((i1.u...235
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY((FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * !((!(EG(!(!(E((i1.u8.p22==1) U (i2.u0.p0==1)))))) + ((!((E(!((i6.u19.p51==0)) U (!(...625
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t9, t10, t39, i1.t45, i1.t44, i1.u8.t3, i1.u8.t4, i2.t41, i2.t40, i2.u10.t5, i2.u...443
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,53.8437,832368,1,0,1.05484e+06,264,851,2.57677e+06,129,1520,750262
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLCardinality-2024-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: E(!(EF(((EG((((i4.i1.u22.p61==0)||(i5.i1.u17.p46==0))||(i4.i1.u16.p44==1))) * ((!((i5.i1.u17.p46==0)||(i2.u3.p8==1)))||(i5.i1.u18.p50!=1)...233
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(FwdU(Init,!(E(TRUE U ((EG((((i4.i1.u22.p61==0)||(i5.i1.u17.p46==0))||(i4.i1.u16.p44==1))) * ((!((i5.i...290
(forward)formula 1,0,146.597,2087884,1,0,2.71521e+06,324,1056,6.57933e+06,136,1549,1921889
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLCardinality-2024-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2024-05-29 03:09:42] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-29 03:09:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 03:09:42] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-29 03:09:42] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-29 03:09:42] [INFO ] Removed a total of 18 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-29 03:09:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 03:09:42] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 24 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2024-05-29 03:09:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10819796847041828754.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 03:09:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality405205151914373507.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10819796847041828754.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality405205151914373507.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 5 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,0.735028,32552,658,28,56191,112,141,112441,29,259,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG(EF((i10.u30.p36==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(E(TRUE U (i10.u30.p36==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t27, t28, t30, t36, t38, t40, t41, t44, t45, t51, t52, u12.t3, u12.t4, u14.t5, u14.t6, u15.t7...373
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,31.1148,972544,1,0,1.86613e+06,166,699,3.96219e+06,115,328,1789354
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLCardinality-2024-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: AG(A(AF((u31.p0!=1)) U AG(!(AF((u1.p1==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(!(E(TRUE U !(!(!(EG(!((u1.p1==1)))))))))) * !(!(EG(!((u31.p0!=1)))))),TRUE) * !(...261
(forward)formula 1,0,59.4321,1865956,1,0,3.52339e+06,170,734,7.52223e+06,116,332,3727676
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLCardinality-2024-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: AF((EG(((u27.p56==0)||(i11.u21.p43==1))) * ((i2.u4.p6==1) + EF(AG(A((u29.p63==1) U (u29.p63==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((EG(((u27.p56==0)||(i11.u21.p43==1))) * ((i2.u4.p6==1) + E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!((u29.p63==1))...235
(forward)formula 2,0,271.506,3791240,1,0,6.75747e+06,170,313,1.67382e+07,69,333,771351
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLCardinality-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: EF((((EG((((i2.u5.p9==1)||(i12.u24.p48==0))||(u27.p56==1))) * EG(EX(((i3.u7.p11==1)||(u26.p54==1))))) * (EG((u1.p1==0)) * ((u2.p4==0)||(u...241
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((EG((((i2.u5.p9==1)||(i12.u24.p48==0))||(u27.p56==1))) * EG(EX(((i3.u7.p11==1)||(u26.p54...657
(forward)formula 3,1,449.775,5556804,1,0,9.44917e+06,170,326,2.49542e+07,74,333,292042
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLCardinality-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: A(!(AF(E(EF((u28.p59==1)) U (EF((i4.u10.p16==1)) + (i10.u19.p40!=1))))) U A(EF(((u28.p58==0)||(i12.u36.p46==1))) U (EX(EG((u27.p56==1))) ...207
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((E(!((EX(EG((u27.p56==1))) + !((((i2.u5.p8==0)||(u15.p33==0))||(u31.p0==1))))) U (!(E(TRUE U ...1067
(forward)formula 4,0,507.399,5556804,1,0,9.44917e+06,170,422,2.49542e+07,78,333,4753348
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLCardinality-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Total runtime 1243158 ms.

BK_STOP 1716952690483

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldPPPs-PT-002A"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldPPPs-PT-002A, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r356-tall-171683760900369"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldPPPs-PT-002A.tgz
mv ShieldPPPs-PT-002A execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;