Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r356-tall-171683760900354.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldPPPs-PT-001A, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r356-tall-171683760900354
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 452K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.9K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 78K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.9K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 45K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.4K Apr 23 07:53 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K Apr 23 07:53 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.0K Apr 23 07:53 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K Apr 23 07:53 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.6K Apr 13 11:42 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 88K Apr 13 11:42 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Apr 13 11:41 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 99K Apr 13 11:41 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Apr 23 07:53 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 23 07:53 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.4K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-001A-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-001A-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-001A-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-001A-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-001A-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-001A-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-001A-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-001A-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-001A-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-001A-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-001A-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-001A-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-001A-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-001A-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-001A-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-001A-CTLFireability-2023-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716950739082

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldPPPs-PT-001A
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-29 02:45:40] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-29 02:45:40] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-29 02:45:40] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 36 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:40] [INFO ] Transformed 34 places.
[2024-05-29 02:45:40] [INFO ] Transformed 29 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:45:40] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-29 02:45:40] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 34 places and 29 transitions and 106 arcs in 128 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 14 ms.
Support contains 33 out of 34 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 34/34 places, 29/29 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 14 ms. Remains 34 /34 variables (removed 0) and now considering 29/29 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 29 rows 34 cols
[2024-05-29 02:45:40] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 7 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 145 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 02:45:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 02:45:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 64 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 237 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:45:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/34 variables, 12/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 1/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 29/63 variables, 34/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/63 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 63/63 variables, and 80 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 429 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 34/34 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 34/34 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/34 variables, 12/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 1/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 29/63 variables, 34/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 28/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/63 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 63/63 variables, and 108 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 315 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 34/34 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 34/34 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 773ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 781ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1056 ms. Remains : 34/34 places, 29/29 transitions.
Support contains 33 out of 34 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-29 02:45:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 29 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 48 to 40
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (284 resets) in 828 ms. (48 steps per ms) remains 1/40 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (69 resets) in 152 ms. (261 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2024-05-29 02:45:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp37 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 8/63 variables, and 5 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 22 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 3/34 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/12 constraints, State Equation: 0/34 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 25ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2024-05-29 02:45:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 29 transitions.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 34/34 places, 29/29 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 34 /34 variables (removed 0) and now considering 29/29 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:45:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 02:45:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 02:45:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 02:45:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 46 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 87 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-29 02:45:42] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:45:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/34 variables, 12/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 1/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 29/63 variables, 34/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/63 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 63/63 variables, and 80 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 290 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 34/34 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 34/34 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/34 variables, 12/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 1/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 29/63 variables, 34/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 28/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/63 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 63/63 variables, and 108 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 308 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 34/34 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 34/34 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 624ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 625ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 723 ms. Remains : 34/34 places, 29/29 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:45:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 29 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:45:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6751057786134282156.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17689499765101140013.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6751057786134282156.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17689499765101140013.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,61496,0.058614,5636,2,612,5,9541,6,0,167,14166,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((((p5==1)&&(p24==1)) + ((!(A((p28==1) U ((p13==1)&&(p32==1)))) * A(((p11==1)&&(p23==1)) U ((p7==1)&&(p9==1)))) * (((p11==0)||(p21==0))...181
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((((p5==1)&&(p24==1)) + ((!(!((E(!(((p13==1)&&(p32==1))) U (!((p28==1)) * !(((p13==1)&&(p32==1))))) ...360
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t11, t15, t17, t25, t27, Intersection with reachable at ...221
(forward)formula 0,1,3.74644,138520,1,0,1214,787503,101,590,1106,1.05248e+06,1301
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-001A-CTLFireability-2024-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 34/34 places, 29/29 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 32 transition count 27
Applied a total of 4 rules in 12 ms. Remains 32 /34 variables (removed 2) and now considering 27/29 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 27 rows 32 cols
[2024-05-29 02:45:46] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 02:45:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 02:45:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 40 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 75 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-29 02:45:46] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 26 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:45:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 31/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/32 variables, 12/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 1/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 27/59 variables, 32/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/59 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 59/59 variables, and 76 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved in 231 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 32/32 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 32/32 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 31/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/32 variables, 12/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 1/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 27/59 variables, 32/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 26/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/59 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 59/59 variables, and 102 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved in 267 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 32/32 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 32/32 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 504ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 504ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 32/34 places, 27/29 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 597 ms. Remains : 32/34 places, 27/29 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:45:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 27 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:45:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2608365550710038497.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13552853581858173849.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2608365550710038497.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13552853581858173849.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,36602,0.05226,5960,2,622,5,9584,6,0,157,15565,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AF(((p1==1)&&(p26==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!(((p1==1)&&(p26==1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t9, t11, t17, t19, t21, t23, t24, Intersection with reachable at eac...218
(forward)formula 0,1,1.64086,67576,1,0,535,320194,81,277,1036,518632,536
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-001A-CTLFireability-2024-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 34/34 places, 29/29 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 33 transition count 28
Applied a total of 2 rules in 3 ms. Remains 33 /34 variables (removed 1) and now considering 28/29 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 28 rows 33 cols
[2024-05-29 02:45:49] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 02:45:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 02:45:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 40 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 73 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-29 02:45:49] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 27 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:45:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/33 variables, 12/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 1/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 28/61 variables, 33/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/61 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 61/61 variables, and 78 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved in 255 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 33/33 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 33/33 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/33 variables, 12/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 1/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 28/61 variables, 33/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 27/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/61 variables, 0/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 61/61 variables, and 105 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved in 284 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 33/33 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 33/33 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 547ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 547ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 33/34 places, 28/29 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 627 ms. Remains : 33/34 places, 28/29 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:45:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 28 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:45:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15944679259856365630.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18218036425924722401.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15944679259856365630.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18218036425924722401.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,49024,0.048086,5704,2,554,5,8815,6,0,162,14166,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(((p11==0)||(p23==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((p11==0)||(p23==0)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t12, t14, t22, t24, t26, Intersection with reachable at ...221
(forward)formula 0,1,0.087216,6496,1,0,80,16625,77,31,1051,14796,66
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-001A-CTLFireability-2024-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 34/34 places, 29/29 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 34 /34 variables (removed 0) and now considering 29/29 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 29 rows 34 cols
[2024-05-29 02:45:49] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 8 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 02:45:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 02:45:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 51 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 104 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:45:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/34 variables, 12/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 1/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 29/63 variables, 34/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/63 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 63/63 variables, and 80 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 267 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 34/34 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 34/34 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/34 variables, 12/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 1/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 29/63 variables, 34/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 28/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/63 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 63/63 variables, and 108 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 270 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 34/34 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 34/34 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 545ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 545ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 651 ms. Remains : 34/34 places, 29/29 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:45:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 29 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:45:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12756488007606328870.gal : 8 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13212121825416125795.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12756488007606328870.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13212121825416125795.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,61496,0.051916,5712,2,612,5,9541,6,0,167,14166,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EF(EG((((p4==1)&&(p25==1))||((p13==1)&&(p33==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U EG((((p4==1)&&(p25==1))||((p13==1)&&(p33==1)))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t11, t15, t17, t25, t27, Intersection with reachable at ...221
(forward)formula 0,0,0.591704,28328,1,0,261,146634,83,105,1082,182409,294
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-001A-CTLFireability-2024-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 34/34 places, 29/29 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 34 /34 variables (removed 0) and now considering 29/29 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:45:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 02:45:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 02:45:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 02:45:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 41 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 84 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:45:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/34 variables, 12/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 1/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 29/63 variables, 34/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/63 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 63/63 variables, and 80 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 266 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 34/34 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 34/34 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/34 variables, 12/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 1/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 29/63 variables, 34/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 28/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/63 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 63/63 variables, and 108 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 285 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 34/34 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 34/34 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 559ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 561ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 648 ms. Remains : 34/34 places, 29/29 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:45:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 29 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:45:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability971989551163524968.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1326581583297579101.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability971989551163524968.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1326581583297579101.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,61496,0.0483,5708,2,612,5,9541,6,0,167,14166,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((!(E((EF((p27==1)) + AG((p22==1))) U !(AX((p15==1))))) * (p15==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p15==0)) * !(E((E(TRUE U (p27==1)) + !(E(TRUE U !((p22==1))))) U !(!(EX(!((p15==1))))))))]...164
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t11, t15, t17, t25, t27, Intersection with reachable at ...221
(forward)formula 0,1,0.187274,11780,1,0,119,44321,87,56,1091,49776,119
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-001A-CTLFireability-2024-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 34/34 places, 29/29 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 33 transition count 28
Applied a total of 2 rules in 8 ms. Remains 33 /34 variables (removed 1) and now considering 28/29 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 28 rows 33 cols
[2024-05-29 02:45:51] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 02:45:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 02:45:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 42 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 82 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-29 02:45:51] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 27 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:45:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/33 variables, 12/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 1/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 28/61 variables, 33/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/61 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 61/61 variables, and 78 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved in 233 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 33/33 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 33/33 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/33 variables, 12/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 1/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 28/61 variables, 33/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 27/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
[2024-05-29 02:45:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 1/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/61 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 61/61 variables, and 106 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved in 399 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 33/33 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 33/33 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 638ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 639ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 33/34 places, 28/29 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 733 ms. Remains : 33/34 places, 28/29 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:45:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 28 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:45:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5158496791967352196.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7296118509541954083.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5158496791967352196.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7296118509541954083.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,45914,0.049289,5704,2,589,5,9218,6,0,162,13939,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((A(((AF((((p17==1)&&(p19==1))&&((p8==1)&&(p29==1)))) + !((((p32==1)&&(p7==1))&&(p9==1)))) + (p31==1)) U A(E(((p4==1)&&(p25==1)) U ((p5...237
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((E(!(!((E(!(EG(((p18==1)&&(p27==1)))) U (!(E(((p4==1)&&(p25==1)) U ((p5==1)&&(p2...714
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t12, t14, t20, t22, t24, t25, Intersection with reachable at eac...218
(forward)formula 0,0,1.96081,73244,1,0,816,385315,108,414,1105,543741,953
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-001A-CTLFireability-2024-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 34/34 places, 29/29 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 34 /34 variables (removed 0) and now considering 29/29 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 29 rows 34 cols
[2024-05-29 02:45:54] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 02:45:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 02:45:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 38 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 69 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:45:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/34 variables, 12/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 1/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 29/63 variables, 34/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/63 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 63/63 variables, and 80 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 250 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 34/34 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 34/34 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/34 variables, 12/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 1/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 29/63 variables, 34/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 28/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/63 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 63/63 variables, and 108 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 315 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 34/34 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 34/34 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 571ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 572ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 643 ms. Remains : 34/34 places, 29/29 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:45:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 29 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:45:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4023559491840108781.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14560315005594144959.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4023559491840108781.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14560315005594144959.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,61496,0.047865,5708,2,612,5,9541,6,0,167,14166,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((EG(((p17==0)||(p19==0))) + AF(((((p22==0)||(p11==0))||(p21==0))&&((((p13==1)&&(p32==1))||((p11==1)&&(p21==1)))||((p12==0)||(p14==0))...300
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([((FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((EG(((p17==0)||(p19==0))) + !(EG(!(((((p22==0)||(p11==0))||(p21==0))&&((((p13==1...977
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t11, t15, t17, t25, t27, Intersection with reachable at ...221
(forward)formula 0,1,0.912964,42672,1,0,600,239508,107,265,1138,284976,661
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-001A-CTLFireability-2024-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 34/34 places, 29/29 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 32 transition count 27
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 31 transition count 26
Applied a total of 4 rules in 4 ms. Remains 31 /34 variables (removed 3) and now considering 26/29 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 26 rows 31 cols
[2024-05-29 02:45:56] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 02:45:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 02:45:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 39 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 78 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-29 02:45:56] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 24 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:45:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 31/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 12/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 26/57 variables, 31/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/57 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 57/57 variables, and 74 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 158 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 31/31 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 31/31 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 31/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 12/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 26/57 variables, 31/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 24/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
[2024-05-29 02:45:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/57 variables, 1/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/57 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 57/57 variables, and 99 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 322 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 31/31 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 31/31 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 488ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 488ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 31/34 places, 26/29 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 577 ms. Remains : 31/34 places, 26/29 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:45:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 26 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:45:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9054728847702238713.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6598194040426075954.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9054728847702238713.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6598194040426075954.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,36601,0.052818,5952,2,765,5,9951,6,0,153,17700,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG(AG(((p7==1)&&(p9==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(E(TRUE U !(((p7==1)&&(p9==1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t9, t11, t17, t19, t21, t22, t25, Intersection with reachable at eac...218
(forward)formula 0,0,0.107647,7272,1,0,82,18978,80,32,966,22649,71
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-001A-CTLFireability-2024-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 34/34 places, 29/29 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 34 /34 variables (removed 0) and now considering 29/29 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 29 rows 34 cols
[2024-05-29 02:45:56] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 02:45:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 02:45:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 38 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 77 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:45:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/34 variables, 12/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 1/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 29/63 variables, 34/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/63 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 63/63 variables, and 80 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 243 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 34/34 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 34/34 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/34 variables, 12/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 1/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 29/63 variables, 34/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 28/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/63 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 63/63 variables, and 108 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 268 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 34/34 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 34/34 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 515ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 516ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 594 ms. Remains : 34/34 places, 29/29 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:45:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 29 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:45:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9483103517281968351.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability615827543545684092.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9483103517281968351.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability615827543545684092.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,61496,0.049626,5708,2,612,5,9541,6,0,167,14166,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AF(AG((p22==1))) * (EF(((EX((p20==1)) + E(((p8==1)&&(p28==1)) U ((p11==1)&&(p21==1)))) + (((p4==1)&&(p25==1))||((p8==1)&&(p28==1)))))...201
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([(EY(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((p22==1)))))))),TRUE)) * (p20==1))] != FALSE + [(FwdU(FwdU((...523
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t11, t15, t17, t25, t27, Intersection with reachable at ...221
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,1.17915,48480,1,0,419,240201,102,243,1149,318965,457
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-001A-CTLFireability-2024-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 34/34 places, 29/29 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 32 transition count 27
Applied a total of 4 rules in 2 ms. Remains 32 /34 variables (removed 2) and now considering 27/29 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 27 rows 32 cols
[2024-05-29 02:45:58] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 02:45:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 02:45:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 40 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 76 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-29 02:45:58] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 26 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:45:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 31/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/32 variables, 12/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 1/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 27/59 variables, 32/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/59 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 59/59 variables, and 76 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved in 214 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 32/32 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 32/32 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 31/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/32 variables, 12/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 1/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 27/59 variables, 32/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 26/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/59 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 59/59 variables, and 102 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved in 275 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 32/32 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 32/32 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 495ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 497ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 32/34 places, 27/29 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 583 ms. Remains : 32/34 places, 27/29 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:45:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 27 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:45:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2293427270853943743.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2746644403947228817.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2293427270853943743.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2746644403947228817.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,36602,0.055096,5960,2,622,5,9584,6,0,157,15565,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG((((p6==1)&&(p22==1))&&((p8==1)&&(p29==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((((p6==1)&&(p22==1))&&((p8==1)&&(p29==1)))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t9, t11, t17, t19, t21, t23, t24, Intersection with reachable at eac...218
(forward)formula 0,0,0.099613,6752,1,0,77,18031,76,30,1040,15858,64
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-001A-CTLFireability-2024-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 34/34 places, 29/29 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 34 /34 variables (removed 0) and now considering 29/29 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 29 rows 34 cols
[2024-05-29 02:45:59] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 02:45:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 02:45:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 02:45:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 34 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 64 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:45:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/34 variables, 12/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 1/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 29/63 variables, 34/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/63 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 63/63 variables, and 80 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 233 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 34/34 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 34/34 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/34 variables, 12/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 1/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 29/63 variables, 34/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 28/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/63 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 63/63 variables, and 108 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 282 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 34/34 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 34/34 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 521ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 521ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 587 ms. Remains : 34/34 places, 29/29 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:46:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 02:46:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 02:46:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 29 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:46:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 02:46:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 02:46:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability388255597114803956.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 02:46:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1651581929858035606.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability388255597114803956.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1651581929858035606.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,61496,0.048007,5708,2,612,5,9541,6,0,167,14166,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(((A(((AF(((p2==1)&&(p10==1))) * (p16==1)) * (p33==1)) U EX(((p4==1)&&(p25==1)))) + (((EF(((p6==1)&&(p22==1))) + (((p2==1)&&(p10==1))&...400
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(TRUE U ((!((E(!(EX(((p4==1)&&(p25==1)))) U (!(((!(EG(!(((p2==1)&&(p10==1))))) * (p16==1)) * (p33==...762
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t11, t15, t17, t25, t27, Intersection with reachable at ...221
(forward)formula 0,0,0.102093,7556,1,0,84,23165,74,34,1058,22899,65
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-001A-CTLFireability-2024-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 34/34 places, 29/29 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 33 transition count 28
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 33 /34 variables (removed 1) and now considering 28/29 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 28 rows 33 cols
[2024-05-29 02:46:00] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-29 02:46:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 02:46:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 02:46:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 43 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 72 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-29 02:46:00] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 27 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:46:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/33 variables, 12/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 1/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 28/61 variables, 33/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/61 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 61/61 variables, and 78 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved in 236 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 33/33 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 33/33 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/33 variables, 12/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 1/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 28/61 variables, 33/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 27/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
[2024-05-29 02:46:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 1/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/61 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 61/61 variables, and 106 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved in 386 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 33/33 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 33/33 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 628ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 629ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 33/34 places, 28/29 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 707 ms. Remains : 33/34 places, 28/29 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:46:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 02:46:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 02:46:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 28 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:46:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 02:46:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 02:46:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1122562073436111543.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 02:46:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16951086532547100275.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1122562073436111543.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16951086532547100275.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,45914,0.054861,5700,2,589,5,9218,6,0,162,13939,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((AF((((p4==0)||(p25==0)) * EG((p15==0)))) + ((p15==1) * AG(((p16==1)&&(p33==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!(EG(!((((p4==0)||(p25==0)) * EG((p15==0)))))) + ((p15==1) * !(E(TRUE U !(((p16==1)&&(p33==1))))))))...165
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t12, t14, t20, t22, t24, t25, Intersection with reachable at eac...218
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,0.37551,19260,1,0,362,87832,97,195,1113,114518,363
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-001A-CTLFireability-2024-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 34/34 places, 29/29 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 34 /34 variables (removed 0) and now considering 29/29 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 29 rows 34 cols
[2024-05-29 02:46:01] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 02:46:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 02:46:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 02:46:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 42 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 79 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:46:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/34 variables, 12/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 1/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 29/63 variables, 34/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/63 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 63/63 variables, and 80 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 259 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 34/34 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 34/34 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/34 variables, 12/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 1/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 29/63 variables, 34/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 28/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/63 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 63/63 variables, and 108 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 276 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 34/34 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 34/34 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 542ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 542ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 622 ms. Remains : 34/34 places, 29/29 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:46:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-29 02:46:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 02:46:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 29 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:46:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 02:46:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 02:46:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18442687344024675693.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 02:46:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14564317259967359816.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18442687344024675693.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14564317259967359816.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,61496,0.056298,5708,2,612,5,9541,6,0,167,14166,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EG(!(E(((p18==1)&&(p27==1)) U ((p1==1)&&(p26==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!(E(((p18==1)&&(p27==1)) U ((p1==1)&&(p26==1)))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t11, t15, t17, t25, t27, Intersection with reachable at ...221
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,1.37693,56944,1,0,529,311955,86,312,1110,415180,508
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-001A-CTLFireability-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 34/34 places, 29/29 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 34 /34 variables (removed 0) and now considering 29/29 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:46:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 02:46:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 02:46:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 02:46:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 35 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 73 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:46:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/34 variables, 12/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 1/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 29/63 variables, 34/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/63 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 63/63 variables, and 80 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 231 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 34/34 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 34/34 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/34 variables, 12/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 1/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 29/63 variables, 34/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 28/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/63 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 63/63 variables, and 108 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 285 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 34/34 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 34/34 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 522ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 522ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 597 ms. Remains : 34/34 places, 29/29 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:46:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 02:46:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 02:46:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 29 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:46:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 02:46:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 02:46:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5327757696335663515.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 02:46:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16633430884592543168.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5327757696335663515.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16633430884592543168.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,61496,0.056555,5708,2,612,5,9541,6,0,167,14166,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((!(E(AF(((p6==1)&&(p23==1))) U AX(((p17==1)&&(p19==1))))) * !(A((p31!=1) U E(((p11==1)&&(p21==1)) U (p20==1))))) * (AG((AX(((p3==1)&&(p3...207
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(Init,!(EG(!(((p6==1)&&(p23==1)))))) * !(EX(!(((p17==1)&&(p19==1))))))] = FALSE * [((Init * !(EG(!(E(((p...412
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t11, t15, t17, t25, t27, Intersection with reachable at ...221
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,5.75702,197784,1,0,1835,1.11455e+06,111,956,1123,1.60993e+06,1910
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-001A-CTLFireability-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 34/34 places, 29/29 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 34 /34 variables (removed 0) and now considering 29/29 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:46:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 02:46:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 02:46:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 02:46:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 39 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 74 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:46:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/34 variables, 12/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 1/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 29/63 variables, 34/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/63 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 63/63 variables, and 80 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 248 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 34/34 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 34/34 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/34 variables, 12/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 1/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 29/63 variables, 34/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 28/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/63 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 63/63 variables, and 108 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 288 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 34/34 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 34/34 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 545ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 546ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 623 ms. Remains : 34/34 places, 29/29 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:46:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 02:46:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 02:46:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 29 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:46:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 02:46:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 02:46:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11766606320974600457.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 02:46:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9730979630648824101.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11766606320974600457.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9730979630648824101.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,61496,0.04812,5708,2,612,5,9541,6,0,167,14166,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX(AF((p20==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(EG(!((p20==0)))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t11, t15, t17, t25, t27, Intersection with reachable at ...221
(forward)formula 0,0,0.794887,36076,1,0,258,213472,81,104,1074,255708,279
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-001A-CTLFireability-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 34/34 places, 29/29 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 34 /34 variables (removed 0) and now considering 29/29 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:46:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 02:46:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 02:46:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 02:46:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 37 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 73 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:46:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/34 variables, 12/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 1/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 29/63 variables, 34/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/63 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 63/63 variables, and 80 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 231 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 34/34 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 34/34 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/34 variables, 12/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 1/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 29/63 variables, 34/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 28/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/63 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 63/63 variables, and 108 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 293 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 34/34 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 34/34 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 528ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 528ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 601 ms. Remains : 34/34 places, 29/29 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:46:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 02:46:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 02:46:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 29 transitions.
[2024-05-29 02:46:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 02:46:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 02:46:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13992423658324545593.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-29 02:46:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1352338680822764999.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13992423658324545593.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1352338680822764999.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,61496,0.052502,5708,2,612,5,9541,6,0,167,14166,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AF(((p32==1) + (EX((p27==0)) * EG((p22==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!(((p32==1) + (EX((p27==0)) * EG((p22==1))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t11, t15, t17, t25, t27, Intersection with reachable at ...221
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,2.07053,78208,1,0,962,426134,88,576,1105,590123,890
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-001A-CTLFireability-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2024-05-29 02:46:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 02:46:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Total runtime 33599 ms.

BK_STOP 1716950773918

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldPPPs-PT-001A"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldPPPs-PT-001A, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r356-tall-171683760900354"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldPPPs-PT-001A.tgz
mv ShieldPPPs-PT-001A execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;