About the Execution of ITS-Tools for ShieldIIPt-PT-010A
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
7121.928 | 3600000.00 | 3702892.00 | 9955.60 | FFTTFFTFFFTTTT?T | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r356-tall-171683760700258.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldIIPt-PT-010A, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r356-tall-171683760700258
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 508K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 76K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.4K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 50K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K Apr 23 07:52 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 23K Apr 23 07:52 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K Apr 23 07:52 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Apr 23 07:52 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K Apr 12 21:50 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 153K Apr 12 21:50 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.3K Apr 12 21:40 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 39K Apr 12 21:40 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Apr 23 07:52 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 23 07:52 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 53K May 18 16:43 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2023-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1716930442205
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldIIPt-PT-010A
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-28 21:07:23] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-28 21:07:23] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-28 21:07:23] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 69 ms
[2024-05-28 21:07:23] [INFO ] Transformed 193 places.
[2024-05-28 21:07:23] [INFO ] Transformed 143 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:07:23] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-28 21:07:23] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 193 places and 143 transitions and 606 arcs in 162 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 12 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 1 transitions.
Support contains 135 out of 193 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 193/193 places, 142/142 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 193 /193 variables (removed 0) and now considering 142/142 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 142 rows 193 cols
[2024-05-28 21:07:23] [INFO ] Computed 91 invariants in 17 ms
[2024-05-28 21:07:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 281 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 21:07:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 21:07:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 174 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 485 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 141 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:07:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 192/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/193 variables, 91/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 1/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 0/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 142/335 variables, 193/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 0/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/335 variables, 0/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 335/335 variables, and 477 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved in 4255 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 193/193 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 193/193 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 141/141 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 192/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/193 variables, 91/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 1/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 0/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 142/335 variables, 193/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 141/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 0/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/335 variables, 0/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 335/335 variables, and 618 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved in 5193 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 193/193 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 193/193 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 141/141 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 9526ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 9544ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 10059 ms. Remains : 193/193 places, 142/142 transitions.
Support contains 135 out of 193 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-28 21:07:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 40 ms
[2024-05-28 21:07:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-05-28 21:07:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 142 transitions.
Support contains 121 out of 193 places (down from 135) after GAL structural reductions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 68 to 64
RANDOM walk for 34866 steps (7 resets) in 1429 ms. (24 steps per ms) remains 0/64 properties
[2024-05-28 21:07:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-28 21:07:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-28 21:07:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 142 transitions.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 193/193 places, 142/142 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 193 /193 variables (removed 0) and now considering 142/142 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:07:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 21:07:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 132 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 21:07:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 21:07:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 156 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 291 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 141 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:07:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 192/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/193 variables, 91/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 1/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 0/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 142/335 variables, 193/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 0/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/335 variables, 0/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 335/335 variables, and 477 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved in 3830 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 193/193 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 193/193 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 141/141 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 192/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/193 variables, 91/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 1/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 0/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 142/335 variables, 193/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 141/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 0/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/335 variables, 0/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 335/335 variables, and 618 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved in 5088 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 193/193 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 193/193 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 141/141 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 8944ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8946ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 9248 ms. Remains : 193/193 places, 142/142 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:07:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-28 21:07:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-28 21:07:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 142 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:07:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-28 21:07:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-28 21:07:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13922306895223801981.gal : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 21:07:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16638687801463296764.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13922306895223801981.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16638687801463296764.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.30584e+28,0.272192,13288,2,506,5,40734,6,0,916,64511,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AF((AG(((p12==0)||(p37==0))) + (p166==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!((!(E(TRUE U !(((p12==0)||(p37==0))))) + (p166==1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,0.448542,13540,1,0,11,45445,23,3,5017,64511,11
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2024-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 193/193 places, 142/142 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 193 transition count 141
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 192 transition count 141
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 191 transition count 140
Applied a total of 4 rules in 40 ms. Remains 191 /193 variables (removed 2) and now considering 140/142 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 140 rows 191 cols
[2024-05-28 21:07:44] [INFO ] Computed 91 invariants in 5 ms
[2024-05-28 21:07:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 138 ms returned [183, 184]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 140 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 189/193 places, 140/142 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 189 transition count 139
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 188 transition count 139
Applied a total of 2 rules in 11 ms. Remains 188 /189 variables (removed 1) and now considering 139/140 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 139 rows 188 cols
[2024-05-28 21:07:44] [INFO ] Computed 89 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-28 21:07:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 96 ms returned [177]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 96 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 187/193 places, 139/142 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 186 transition count 138
Applied a total of 2 rules in 12 ms. Remains 186 /187 variables (removed 1) and now considering 138/139 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 138 rows 186 cols
[2024-05-28 21:07:44] [INFO ] Computed 88 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-28 21:07:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 97 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 21:07:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 21:07:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 157 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 257 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 186/193 places, 138/142 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 561 ms. Remains : 186/193 places, 138/142 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:07:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-28 21:07:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-28 21:07:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 138 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:07:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-28 21:07:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-28 21:07:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7040994071197454011.gal : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 21:07:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4586681042991822387.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7040994071197454011.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4586681042991822387.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.30584e+27,0.218731,12788,2,486,5,38354,6,0,884,60724,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(((p145==1)&&(p170==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(((p145==1)&&(p170==1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.313739,13052,1,0,6,38354,15,0,4362,60724,5
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2024-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 193/193 places, 142/142 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 193 /193 variables (removed 0) and now considering 142/142 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 142 rows 193 cols
[2024-05-28 21:07:45] [INFO ] Computed 91 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-28 21:07:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 103 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 21:07:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 21:07:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 153 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 259 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 141 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:07:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 192/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/193 variables, 91/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 1/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 0/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 142/335 variables, 193/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 0/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/335 variables, 0/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 335/335 variables, and 477 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved in 3882 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 193/193 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 193/193 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 141/141 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 192/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/193 variables, 91/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 1/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 0/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 142/335 variables, 193/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 141/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 0/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/335 variables, 0/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 335/335 variables, and 618 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved in 5231 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 193/193 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 193/193 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 141/141 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 9133ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 9136ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 9403 ms. Remains : 193/193 places, 142/142 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:07:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-28 21:07:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-28 21:07:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 142 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:07:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-28 21:07:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-28 21:07:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2072612067003313181.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 21:07:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11001811261582361450.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2072612067003313181.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11001811261582361450.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.30584e+28,0.245296,13360,2,506,5,40734,6,0,916,64511,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AX((p90==1)) U E(EF(((p5==1)&&(p16==1))) U (((p155==1)&&(p172==1)) * ((p191==1) * ((EG(((p80==1)&&(p93==1))) + ((!(((p80==1)&&(p93==1))...296
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG(((FwdU(FwdU(Init,!(EX(!((p90==1))))),E(TRUE U ((p5==1)&&(p16==1)))) * ((p155==1)&&(p172==1))) * (p191==1...699
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 137/4/5
(forward)formula 0,1,0.638579,22032,1,0,13,85637,33,3,5105,89483,21
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2024-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 193/193 places, 142/142 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 193 transition count 141
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 192 transition count 141
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 191 transition count 140
Applied a total of 4 rules in 19 ms. Remains 191 /193 variables (removed 2) and now considering 140/142 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 140 rows 191 cols
[2024-05-28 21:07:55] [INFO ] Computed 91 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-28 21:07:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 113 ms returned [183, 184]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 115 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 189/193 places, 140/142 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 189 transition count 139
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 188 transition count 139
Applied a total of 2 rules in 8 ms. Remains 188 /189 variables (removed 1) and now considering 139/140 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 139 rows 188 cols
[2024-05-28 21:07:55] [INFO ] Computed 89 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-28 21:07:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 100 ms returned [177]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 105 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 187/193 places, 139/142 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 186 transition count 138
Applied a total of 2 rules in 8 ms. Remains 186 /187 variables (removed 1) and now considering 138/139 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 138 rows 186 cols
[2024-05-28 21:07:55] [INFO ] Computed 88 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-28 21:07:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 104 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 21:07:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 21:07:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 151 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 259 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 186/193 places, 138/142 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 514 ms. Remains : 186/193 places, 138/142 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:07:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-28 21:07:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-28 21:07:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 138 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 868 steps (0 resets) in 22 ms. (37 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2024-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2024-05-28 21:07:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-28 21:07:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-28 21:07:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15898307589285782354.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 21:07:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality3551597449633071125.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15898307589285782354.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality3551597449633071125.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 193/193 places, 142/142 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 193 /193 variables (removed 0) and now considering 142/142 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 142 rows 193 cols
[2024-05-28 21:07:55] [INFO ] Computed 91 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-28 21:07:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 101 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 21:07:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 21:07:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 159 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 268 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 141 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:07:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 192/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/193 variables, 91/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 1/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 0/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 142/335 variables, 193/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 0/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/335 variables, 0/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 335/335 variables, and 477 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved in 3762 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 193/193 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 193/193 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 141/141 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 192/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/193 variables, 91/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 1/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 0/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 142/335 variables, 193/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 141/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 0/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/335 variables, 0/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 335/335 variables, and 618 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved in 5034 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 193/193 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 193/193 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 141/141 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 8823ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8828ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 9099 ms. Remains : 193/193 places, 142/142 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:08:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-28 21:08:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-28 21:08:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 142 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:08:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-28 21:08:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-28 21:08:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7564842397374178005.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 21:08:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15239681814160580204.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7564842397374178005.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15239681814160580204.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.30584e+28,0.237054,13364,2,506,5,40734,6,0,916,64511,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(EX((p134==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(EX((p134==1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.347492,13628,1,0,8,40734,14,1,4517,64511,6
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2024-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 193/193 places, 142/142 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 193 /193 variables (removed 0) and now considering 142/142 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:08:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 21:08:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 111 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 21:08:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 21:08:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 147 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 259 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 141 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:08:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 192/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/193 variables, 91/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 1/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 0/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 142/335 variables, 193/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 0/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/335 variables, 0/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 335/335 variables, and 477 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved in 3843 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 193/193 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 193/193 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 141/141 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 192/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/193 variables, 91/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 1/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 0/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 142/335 variables, 193/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 141/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 0/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/335 variables, 0/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 335/335 variables, and 618 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved in 5139 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 193/193 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 193/193 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 141/141 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 9009ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 9012ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 9272 ms. Remains : 193/193 places, 142/142 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:08:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-28 21:08:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-28 21:08:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 142 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:08:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-28 21:08:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-28 21:08:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14460815045151903698.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 21:08:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15501517659591681968.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14460815045151903698.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15501517659591681968.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.30584e+28,0.236713,13356,2,506,5,40734,6,0,916,64511,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EF((AF(((p61==1)&&(p74==1))) * AX((p14==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U (!(EG(!(((p61==1)&&(p74==1))))) * !(EX(!((p14==1))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.345842,13620,1,0,7,40734,16,1,4674,64511,5
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2024-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 193/193 places, 142/142 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 193 /193 variables (removed 0) and now considering 142/142 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:08:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 21:08:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 106 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 21:08:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 21:08:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 154 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 261 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 141 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:08:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 192/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/193 variables, 91/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 1/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 0/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 142/335 variables, 193/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 0/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/335 variables, 0/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 335/335 variables, and 477 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved in 3762 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 193/193 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 193/193 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 141/141 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 192/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/193 variables, 91/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 1/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 0/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 142/335 variables, 193/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 141/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 0/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/335 variables, 0/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 335/335 variables, and 618 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved in 5080 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 193/193 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 193/193 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 141/141 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 8861ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8862ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 9129 ms. Remains : 193/193 places, 142/142 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:08:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-28 21:08:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-28 21:08:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 142 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:08:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-28 21:08:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-28 21:08:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12369253850793756603.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 21:08:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15425698312990011187.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12369253850793756603.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15425698312990011187.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.30584e+28,0.226656,13360,2,506,5,40734,6,0,916,64511,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EG((p147==1)) U AX(((((p185==1) + E(!(((p137==1)&&(p150==1))) U (((p191==1)&&(p90==1))&&(p105==1)))) + ((((p121==1)&&(p123==1))&&((p3==...266
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,EG((p147==1))) * !(EX(!(((((p185==1) + E(!(((p137==1)&&(p150==1))) U (((p191==1)&&(p90==1))&&(p105==...324
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 137/0/5
(forward)formula 0,1,0.464489,15736,1,0,19,63361,40,8,4968,64511,21
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2024-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 193/193 places, 142/142 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 193 /193 variables (removed 0) and now considering 142/142 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:08:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 21:08:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 100 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 21:08:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 21:08:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 161 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 263 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 141 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:08:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 192/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/193 variables, 91/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 1/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 0/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 142/335 variables, 193/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 0/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/335 variables, 0/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 335/335 variables, and 477 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved in 3823 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 193/193 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 193/193 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 141/141 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 192/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/193 variables, 91/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 1/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 0/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 142/335 variables, 193/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 141/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 0/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/335 variables, 0/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 335/335 variables, and 618 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved in 5153 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 193/193 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 193/193 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 141/141 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 8994ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8996ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 9261 ms. Remains : 193/193 places, 142/142 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:08:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-28 21:08:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-28 21:08:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 142 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:08:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 21:08:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 21:08:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6328201993958966345.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 21:08:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4413994072882571163.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6328201993958966345.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4413994072882571163.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.30584e+28,0.242775,13360,2,506,5,40734,6,0,916,64511,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AX(((p62==0)||(p73==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(((p62==0)||(p73==0))))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 0,0,0.253152,13624,1,0,9,40734,9,2,1679,64511,2
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2024-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 193/193 places, 142/142 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 193 /193 variables (removed 0) and now considering 142/142 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:08:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 21:08:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 113 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 21:08:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 21:08:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 157 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 271 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 141 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:08:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 192/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/193 variables, 91/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 1/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 0/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 142/335 variables, 193/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 0/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/335 variables, 0/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 335/335 variables, and 477 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved in 3828 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 193/193 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 193/193 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 141/141 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 192/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/193 variables, 91/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 1/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 0/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 142/335 variables, 193/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 141/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 0/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/335 variables, 0/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 335/335 variables, and 618 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved in 5107 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 193/193 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 193/193 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 141/141 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 8953ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8955ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 9231 ms. Remains : 193/193 places, 142/142 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:08:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-28 21:08:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-28 21:08:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 142 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:08:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 21:08:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 21:08:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14540299253591946349.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 21:08:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3624296965383773252.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14540299253591946349.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3624296965383773252.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.30584e+28,0.238115,13356,2,506,5,40734,6,0,916,64511,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(((A(((p8==1)&&(p19==1)) U ((p157==1)&&(p168==1))) + (p168==0)) * EX((p185==0)))) + (AG(((p140==0)||(p142==0))) * AX(((p75==0) + (AX((...228
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((Init * !(!(E(TRUE U !(((!((E(!(((p157==1)&&(p168==1))) U (!(((p8==1)&&(p19==1))) * !(((p157==1)&&(p168=...789
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 137/0/5
(forward)formula 0,0,0.618074,20952,1,0,25,80757,39,11,5087,81850,22
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2024-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 193/193 places, 142/142 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 193 /193 variables (removed 0) and now considering 142/142 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:08:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 21:08:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 104 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 21:08:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 21:08:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 137 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 243 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 141 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:08:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 192/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/193 variables, 91/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 1/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 0/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 142/335 variables, 193/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 0/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/335 variables, 0/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 335/335 variables, and 477 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved in 3851 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 193/193 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 193/193 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 141/141 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 192/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/193 variables, 91/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 1/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 0/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 142/335 variables, 193/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 141/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 0/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/335 variables, 0/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 335/335 variables, and 618 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved in 5264 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 193/193 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 193/193 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 141/141 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 9135ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 9137ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 9382 ms. Remains : 193/193 places, 142/142 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:08:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-28 21:08:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 21:08:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 142 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:08:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 21:08:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 21:08:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3318286164041062566.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 21:08:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6730203249271794863.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3318286164041062566.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6730203249271794863.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.30584e+28,0.233582,13360,2,506,5,40734,6,0,916,64511,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(((AF((((p6==0)||(p15==0))||((p128==0)||(p143==0)))) + EX(A(((p138==1)&&(p149==1)) U (p73==1)))) * AF(E((((p82==1)&&(p91==1))||((p6==1...380
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG((EY(Init) * !(EX(!((E(!((p73==1)) U (!(((p138==1)&&(p149==1))) * !((p73==1)))) + EG(!((p73==1)))))))),!(...672
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 132/18/10
(forward)formula 0,0,0.627208,21420,1,0,11,82896,39,3,5137,85019,18
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2024-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 193/193 places, 142/142 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 193 /193 variables (removed 0) and now considering 142/142 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:08:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 21:08:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 102 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 21:08:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 21:08:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 154 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 257 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 141 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:08:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 192/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/193 variables, 91/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 1/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 0/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 142/335 variables, 193/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 0/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/335 variables, 0/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 335/335 variables, and 477 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved in 3901 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 193/193 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 193/193 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 141/141 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 192/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/193 variables, 91/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 1/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 0/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 142/335 variables, 193/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 141/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 0/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/335 variables, 0/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 335/335 variables, and 618 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved in 5138 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 193/193 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 193/193 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 141/141 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 9057ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 9059ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 9318 ms. Remains : 193/193 places, 142/142 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:09:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-28 21:09:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 21:09:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 142 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:09:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 21:09:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-28 21:09:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18105490937097533855.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 21:09:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6729203234681507015.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18105490937097533855.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6729203234681507015.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.30584e+28,0.231716,13368,2,506,5,40734,6,0,916,64511,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((!(((EF(AG(((p14==1)&&(p29==1)))) * (p137==1)) * ((p150==1) * AX((((p31==1)&&(p56==1))&&((p14==1)&&(p29==1))))))) + ((EX(E(((p100==1)&&...586
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(!(((E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(((p14==1)&&(p29==1)))))) * (p137==1)) * ((p150==1) * !(EX(!((((p31==1)&&(...784
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 139/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 136/0/6
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 126/0/16
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 137/4/5
(forward)formula 0,1,0.820975,28556,1,0,27,118992,68,9,5419,130858,36
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2024-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 193/193 places, 142/142 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 193 /193 variables (removed 0) and now considering 142/142 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:09:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 21:09:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 101 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 21:09:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 21:09:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 152 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 254 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 141 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:09:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 192/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/193 variables, 91/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 1/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 0/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 142/335 variables, 193/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 0/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/335 variables, 0/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 335/335 variables, and 477 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved in 3867 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 193/193 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 193/193 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 141/141 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 192/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/193 variables, 91/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 1/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 0/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 142/335 variables, 193/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 141/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 0/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/335 variables, 0/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 335/335 variables, and 618 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved in 5255 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 193/193 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 193/193 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 141/141 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 9140ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 9141ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 9397 ms. Remains : 193/193 places, 142/142 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:09:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-28 21:09:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 21:09:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 142 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:09:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 21:09:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 21:09:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15065228972560351776.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 21:09:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1266684964835531974.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15065228972560351776.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1266684964835531974.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.30584e+28,0.238672,13360,2,506,5,40734,6,0,916,64511,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E(((EF((((((p25==1)&&(p34==1))&&((p109==1)&&(p124==1)))||((p160==1)&&(p171==1)))||((p157==1)&&(p168==1)))) + AX((AG(((p156==1)&&(p169==...242
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,((E(TRUE U (((((p25==1)&&(p34==1))&&((p109==1)&&(p124==1)))||((p160==1)&&(p171==1)))||((p157==1)&&(p...320
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.342183,13624,1,0,6,40734,15,0,4522,64511,5
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2024-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 193/193 places, 142/142 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 192 transition count 140
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 190 transition count 140
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 188 transition count 139
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 188 transition count 138
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 187 transition count 138
Applied a total of 8 rules in 20 ms. Remains 187 /193 variables (removed 6) and now considering 138/142 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 138 rows 187 cols
[2024-05-28 21:09:14] [INFO ] Computed 89 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-28 21:09:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 100 ms returned [176]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 101 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 186/193 places, 138/142 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 185 transition count 137
Applied a total of 2 rules in 6 ms. Remains 185 /186 variables (removed 1) and now considering 137/138 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 137 rows 185 cols
[2024-05-28 21:09:14] [INFO ] Computed 88 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-28 21:09:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 94 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 21:09:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 21:09:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 139 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 234 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 185/193 places, 137/142 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 361 ms. Remains : 185/193 places, 137/142 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:09:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 21:09:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 21:09:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 137 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 1915 steps (0 resets) in 18 ms. (100 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2024-05-28 21:09:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-28 21:09:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 21:09:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality14404883015684490213.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 21:09:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality9259424432359491426.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality14404883015684490213.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality9259424432359491426.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-reach command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...329
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 193/193 places, 142/142 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 193 /193 variables (removed 0) and now considering 142/142 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 142 rows 193 cols
[2024-05-28 21:09:14] [INFO ] Computed 91 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-28 21:09:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 100 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 21:09:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 21:09:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 154 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 256 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 141 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:09:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 192/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/193 variables, 91/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 1/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 0/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 142/335 variables, 193/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 0/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/335 variables, 0/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 335/335 variables, and 477 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved in 3823 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 193/193 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 193/193 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 141/141 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 192/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/193 variables, 91/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 1/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 0/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 142/335 variables, 193/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 141/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 0/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/335 variables, 0/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 335/335 variables, and 618 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved in 5151 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 193/193 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 193/193 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 141/141 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 8994ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8996ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 9254 ms. Remains : 193/193 places, 142/142 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:09:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-28 21:09:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-28 21:09:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 142 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:09:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 21:09:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 21:09:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1368170578797368008.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 21:09:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8271916493036406568.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1368170578797368008.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8271916493036406568.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.30584e+28,0.238257,13356,2,506,5,40734,6,0,916,64511,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EX((((p56==0)||(p84==0))||(p95==0))) + A(!(A((((p26==1)&&(p28==1))||(((p125==1)&&(p129==1))&&(p135==1))) U (((p11==1)&&(p15==1))&&(p2...233
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(!((E(!(!((E(!((p128!=1)) U (!(!((((p103==1)&&(p114==1))||((p23==1)&&(p36==1))))) * !((p12...681
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.343139,13620,1,0,6,40734,10,0,4399,64511,4
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 193/193 places, 142/142 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 193 /193 variables (removed 0) and now considering 142/142 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:09:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 21:09:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 96 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 21:09:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 21:09:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 154 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 250 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 141 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:09:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 192/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/193 variables, 91/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 1/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 0/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 142/335 variables, 193/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 0/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/335 variables, 0/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 335/335 variables, and 477 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved in 3903 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 193/193 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 193/193 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 141/141 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 192/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/193 variables, 91/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 1/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 0/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 142/335 variables, 193/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 141/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 0/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/335 variables, 0/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 335/335 variables, and 618 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved in 5107 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 193/193 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 193/193 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 141/141 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 9028ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 9029ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 9281 ms. Remains : 193/193 places, 142/142 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:09:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 21:09:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-28 21:09:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 142 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:09:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 21:09:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 21:09:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9829979491860514573.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 21:09:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7587215496022749304.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9829979491860514573.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7587215496022749304.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.30584e+28,0.242707,13356,2,506,5,40734,6,0,916,64511,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(((p109==1)&&(p124==1)) U (((EF((EX(((p117==1)&&(p134==1))) * AX(((p65==1)&&(p76==1))))) + (p77==1)) + ((((!((p176==1)&&(p187==1)))&&(...287
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((((FwdU(Init,!((((E(TRUE U (EX(((p117==1)&&(p134==1))) * !(EX(!(((p65==1)&&(p76==1))))))) + (p77==1)) + ((((...895
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-28 21:10:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-28 21:10:03] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-28 21:10:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9223459278872643839.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9223459278872643839.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9223459278872643839.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9223459278872643839.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9223459278872643839.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-28 21:10:03] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-28 21:10:03] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-28 21:10:04] [INFO ] Removed a total of 30 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:10:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 39 ms
[2024-05-28 21:10:04] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2024-05-28 21:10:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3521685598578787105.gal : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 21:10:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10687354038134322110.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3521685598578787105.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10687354038134322110.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.30584e+28,0.147135,9988,100,15,13279,496,360,27513,31,3423,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(((i5.i2.u45.p109==1)&&(i5.i2.u51.p124==1)) U (((EF((EX(((i7.i1.u49.p117==1)&&(i7.i1.u56.p134==1))) * AX(((i2.i1.u26.p65==1)&&(i2.i3.u...477
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((((FwdU(Init,!((((E(TRUE U (EX(((i7.i1.u49.p117==1)&&(i7.i1.u56.p134==1))) * !(EX(!(((i2.i1.u26.p65==1)&&(i2...1425
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 193/193 places, 142/142 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 193 /193 variables (removed 0) and now considering 142/142 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:10:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 21:10:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 113 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 21:10:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 21:10:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 159 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 273 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 141 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:10:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 192/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/193 variables, 91/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 1/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 0/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 142/335 variables, 193/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 0/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/335 variables, 0/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 335/335 variables, and 477 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved in 3822 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 193/193 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 193/193 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 141/141 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 192/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/193 variables, 91/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 1/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 0/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 142/335 variables, 193/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 141/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 0/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/335 variables, 0/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 335/335 variables, and 618 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved in 5217 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 193/193 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 193/193 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 141/141 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 9057ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 141 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 9059ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 9334 ms. Remains : 193/193 places, 142/142 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:10:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-28 21:10:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-28 21:10:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 142 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:10:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-28 21:10:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 21:10:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6667362509265578260.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 21:10:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7694645580848790620.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6667362509265578260.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7694645580848790620.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.30584e+28,0.267703,13392,2,506,5,40734,6,0,916,64511,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EX((!(E(((p98==1)&&(p115==1)) U ((p8==1)&&(p19==1)))) + EF((p189==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(E(((p98==1)&&(p115==1)) U ((p8==1)&&(p19==1)))))] != FALSE + [(FwdU(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE...187
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 136/5/6
(forward)formula 0,1,0.404472,13656,1,0,11,41500,17,2,4909,64511,7
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2024-05-28 21:10:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 21:10:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 21:10:43] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-28 21:10:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10618462296797871643.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10618462296797871643.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10618462296797871643.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10618462296797871643.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10618462296797871643.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-28 21:10:43] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-28 21:10:43] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-28 21:10:43] [INFO ] Removed a total of 30 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:10:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-28 21:10:44] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-28 21:10:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6061434784108826536.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 21:10:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2196096419995882655.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6061434784108826536.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2196096419995882655.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.30584e+28,0.15557,10276,82,15,12815,307,320,28857,31,1259,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(((i5.i1.u45.p109==1)&&(i5.i1.u51.p124==1)) U (((EF((EX(((i6.i1.u49.p117==1)&&(i6.i1.u56.p134==1))) * AX(((i2.i2.u26.p65==1)&&(i2.i1.u...477
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((((FwdU(Init,!((((E(TRUE U (EX(((i6.i1.u49.p117==1)&&(i6.i1.u56.p134==1))) * !(EX(!(((i2.i2.u26.p65==1)&&(i2...1425
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-28 21:31:50] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-28 21:31:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-28 21:31:50] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-28 21:31:50] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-28 21:31:50] [INFO ] Removed a total of 40 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:31:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2024-05-28 21:31:50] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-28 21:31:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8080690985950994291.gal : 9 ms
[2024-05-28 21:31:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13205841368879840704.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8080690985950994291.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13205841368879840704.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.30584e+28,0.117479,8720,174,5,11015,288,432,12845,12,220,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(((u58.p109==1)&&(u66.p124==1)) U (((EF((EX(((u62.p117==1)&&(u71.p134==1))) * AX(((i26.u35.p65==1)&&(u40.p76==1))))) + (u41.p77==1)) +...389
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((((FwdU(Init,!((((E(TRUE U (EX(((u62.p117==1)&&(u71.p134==1))) * !(EX(!(((i26.u35.p65==1)&&(u40.p76==1))))))...1185
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-28 21:52:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 21:52:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 142 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:52:56] [INFO ] Transformed 193 places.
[2024-05-28 21:52:56] [INFO ] Transformed 142 transitions.
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/pinvar' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/RGMEDD2' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn' '-META' '-varord-only'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Using order generated by GreatSPN with heuristic : META
[2024-05-28 21:52:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability417262194906235827.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 21:52:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11997164530780434126.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability417262194906235827.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11997164530780434126.ctl' '--load-order' '/home/mcc/execution/model.ord' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...328
Successfully loaded order from file /home/mcc/execution/model.ord
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.30584e+28,0.366148,19232,2,2266,5,70337,6,0,916,80619,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(((p109==1)&&(p124==1)) U (((EF((EX(((p117==1)&&(p134==1))) * AX(((p65==1)&&(p76==1))))) + (p77==1)) + ((((!((p176==1)&&(p187==1)))&&(...287
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((((FwdU(Init,!((((E(TRUE U (EX(((p117==1)&&(p134==1))) * !(EX(!(((p65==1)&&(p76==1))))))) + (p77==1)) + ((((...895
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldIIPt-PT-010A"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldIIPt-PT-010A, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r356-tall-171683760700258"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldIIPt-PT-010A.tgz
mv ShieldIIPt-PT-010A execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;