fond
Model Checking Contest 2024
14th edition, Geneva, Switzerland, June 25, 2024
Execution of r356-tall-171683760700244
Last Updated
July 7, 2024

About the Execution of ITS-Tools for ShieldIIPt-PT-005A

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
387.947 29488.00 45308.00 131.40 TTFFFTFFFFTTFFFF normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r356-tall-171683760700244.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldIIPt-PT-005A, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r356-tall-171683760700244
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 524K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.7K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 60K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.3K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 49K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K Apr 23 07:52 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K Apr 23 07:52 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K Apr 23 07:52 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Apr 23 07:52 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K Apr 12 21:02 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 152K Apr 12 21:02 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Apr 12 20:59 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 98K Apr 12 20:59 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Apr 23 07:52 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 23 07:52 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716927808243

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldIIPt-PT-005A
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-28 20:23:29] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-28 20:23:29] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-28 20:23:29] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 58 ms
[2024-05-28 20:23:29] [INFO ] Transformed 98 places.
[2024-05-28 20:23:29] [INFO ] Transformed 73 transitions.
[2024-05-28 20:23:29] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-28 20:23:29] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 98 places and 73 transitions and 306 arcs in 154 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 14 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 3 formulas.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 1 transitions.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 34 out of 98 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 72/72 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 98 /98 variables (removed 0) and now considering 72/72 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 98 cols
[2024-05-28 20:23:29] [INFO ] Computed 46 invariants in 11 ms
[2024-05-28 20:23:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 208 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 20:23:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 20:23:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 134 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 368 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 71 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 20:23:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 97/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 46/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 1/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 72/170 variables, 98/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/170 variables, 0/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 170/170 variables, and 242 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved in 1478 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 98/98 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 97/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 46/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 1/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 72/170 variables, 98/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 71/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/170 variables, 0/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 170/170 variables, and 313 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved in 1417 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 98/98 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2952ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2972ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3368 ms. Remains : 98/98 places, 72/72 transitions.
Support contains 34 out of 98 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-28 20:23:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2024-05-28 20:23:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-28 20:23:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 72 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 27 to 23
RANDOM walk for 2098 steps (0 resets) in 116 ms. (17 steps per ms) remains 0/23 properties
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((X((G(p1)||p0))&&((p2 U p3) U !p4)))'
Support contains 8 out of 98 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 72/72 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 98 /98 variables (removed 0) and now considering 72/72 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 20:23:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 20:23:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 20:23:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 20:23:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 110 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 174 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 71 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 20:23:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 97/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 46/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 1/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 72/170 variables, 98/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/170 variables, 0/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 170/170 variables, and 242 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved in 1111 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 98/98 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 97/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 46/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 1/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 72/170 variables, 98/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 71/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/170 variables, 0/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 170/170 variables, and 313 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved in 1294 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 98/98 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2429ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2432ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2609 ms. Remains : 98/98 places, 72/72 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 396 ms :[(OR p4 (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), true, (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p3), p4, (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-00
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 412 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 240 ms.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p4) (NOT p3) (NOT p2) p0 p1), (X (NOT p2)), (X (NOT p3)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) p2))), (X (NOT p4)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND p4 (NOT p3) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (OR (AND p4 p3) (AND p4 p2)))), (X (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p2))), (X p0), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (NOT (AND p4 (NOT p3) p2))), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT p3))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) p2)))), (X (X p4)), (X (X (AND p4 (NOT p3) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND p4 p3) (AND p4 p2))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p4 (NOT p3) p2)))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 22 factoid took 24 ms. Reduced automaton from 6 states, 14 edges and 5 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-00 finished in 3768 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X((p0||X(G(p1))))))'
Support contains 3 out of 98 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 72/72 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 98 /98 variables (removed 0) and now considering 72/72 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 20:23:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 20:23:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 85 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 20:23:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 20:23:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 82 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 169 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 71 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 20:23:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 97/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 46/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 1/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 72/170 variables, 98/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/170 variables, 0/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 170/170 variables, and 242 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved in 1082 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 98/98 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 97/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 46/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 1/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 72/170 variables, 98/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 71/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/170 variables, 0/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 170/170 variables, and 313 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved in 1354 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 98/98 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2453ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2454ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2628 ms. Remains : 98/98 places, 72/72 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 179 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-01
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 166 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 179 ms.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 24 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-01 finished in 3192 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 98 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 72/72 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 97 transition count 70
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 95 transition count 70
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 93 transition count 69
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 93 transition count 68
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 92 transition count 68
Applied a total of 8 rules in 28 ms. Remains 92 /98 variables (removed 6) and now considering 68/72 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 92 cols
[2024-05-28 20:23:40] [INFO ] Computed 44 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-28 20:23:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 77 ms returned [81]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 78 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 91/98 places, 68/72 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 90 transition count 67
Applied a total of 2 rules in 7 ms. Remains 90 /91 variables (removed 1) and now considering 67/68 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 67 rows 90 cols
[2024-05-28 20:23:40] [INFO ] Computed 43 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-28 20:23:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 20:23:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 20:23:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 79 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 149 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 90/98 places, 67/72 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 262 ms. Remains : 90/98 places, 67/72 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 67 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-02
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 831 reset in 195 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 86 steps with 0 reset with depth 87 and stack size 87 in 1 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-02 finished in 539 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((F(p0)&&G(p1)&&X(F(p2)))))'
Support contains 4 out of 98 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 72/72 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 98 /98 variables (removed 0) and now considering 72/72 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 98 cols
[2024-05-28 20:23:41] [INFO ] Computed 46 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-28 20:23:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 20:23:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 20:23:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 89 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 158 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 71 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 20:23:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 97/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 46/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 1/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 72/170 variables, 98/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/170 variables, 0/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 170/170 variables, and 242 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved in 1132 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 98/98 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 97/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 46/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 1/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 72/170 variables, 98/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 71/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/170 variables, 0/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 170/170 variables, and 313 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved in 1322 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 98/98 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2466ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2468ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2630 ms. Remains : 98/98 places, 72/72 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 201 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1), (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-03
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 276 reset in 205 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 62 steps with 0 reset with depth 63 and stack size 63 in 1 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-03 finished in 3058 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F((G(F(p0))||(!p1&&F(p0))))&&F(G(p2)))))'
Support contains 4 out of 98 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 72/72 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 98 transition count 71
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 97 transition count 71
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 96 transition count 70
Applied a total of 4 rules in 13 ms. Remains 96 /98 variables (removed 2) and now considering 70/72 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 70 rows 96 cols
[2024-05-28 20:23:44] [INFO ] Computed 46 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-28 20:23:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned [88, 89]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 64 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 94/98 places, 70/72 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 94 transition count 69
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 93 transition count 69
Applied a total of 2 rules in 5 ms. Remains 93 /94 variables (removed 1) and now considering 69/70 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 69 rows 93 cols
[2024-05-28 20:23:44] [INFO ] Computed 44 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-28 20:23:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned [82]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 58 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 92/98 places, 69/72 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 91 transition count 68
Applied a total of 2 rules in 5 ms. Remains 91 /92 variables (removed 1) and now considering 68/69 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 91 cols
[2024-05-28 20:23:44] [INFO ] Computed 43 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-28 20:23:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 20:23:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 20:23:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 74 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 134 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 3 : 91/98 places, 68/72 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 3 iterations and 279 ms. Remains : 91/98 places, 68/72 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 120 ms :[(OR (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p2), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-04
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 879 reset in 210 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 25 steps with 0 reset with depth 26 and stack size 26 in 1 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-04 finished in 635 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((F(p0)&&G((p1||X(G(p2))))))'
Support contains 6 out of 98 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 72/72 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 98 /98 variables (removed 0) and now considering 72/72 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 98 cols
[2024-05-28 20:23:45] [INFO ] Computed 46 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-28 20:23:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 20:23:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 20:23:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 79 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 145 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 71 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 20:23:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 97/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 46/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 1/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 72/170 variables, 98/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/170 variables, 0/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 170/170 variables, and 242 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved in 1087 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 98/98 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 97/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 46/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 1/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 72/170 variables, 98/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 71/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/170 variables, 0/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 170/170 variables, and 313 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved in 1365 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 98/98 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2466ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2467ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2613 ms. Remains : 98/98 places, 72/72 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 201 ms :[true, (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-06
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 30 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-06 finished in 2843 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 98 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 72/72 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 98 /98 variables (removed 0) and now considering 72/72 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 20:23:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 20:23:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 20:23:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 20:23:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 82 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 149 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 71 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 20:23:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 97/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 46/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 1/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 72/170 variables, 98/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/170 variables, 0/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 170/170 variables, and 242 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved in 1130 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 98/98 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 97/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 46/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 1/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 72/170 variables, 98/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 71/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/170 variables, 0/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 170/170 variables, and 313 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved in 1321 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 98/98 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2480ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2482ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2634 ms. Remains : 98/98 places, 72/72 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 83 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-07
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 101 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-07 finished in 2729 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 98 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 72/72 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 98 /98 variables (removed 0) and now considering 72/72 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 20:23:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 20:23:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 20:23:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 20:23:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 82 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 152 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 71 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 20:23:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 97/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 46/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 1/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 72/170 variables, 98/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/170 variables, 0/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 170/170 variables, and 242 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved in 1091 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 98/98 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 97/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 46/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 1/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 72/170 variables, 98/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 71/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/170 variables, 0/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 170/170 variables, and 313 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved in 1358 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 98/98 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2458ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2459ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2613 ms. Remains : 98/98 places, 72/72 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 66 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-09
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 447 reset in 189 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 5 steps with 0 reset with depth 6 and stack size 6 in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-09 finished in 2885 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 98 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 72/72 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 98 /98 variables (removed 0) and now considering 72/72 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 20:23:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 20:23:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 20:23:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 20:23:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 81 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 145 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 71 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 20:23:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 97/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 46/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 1/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 72/170 variables, 98/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/170 variables, 0/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 170/170 variables, and 242 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved in 1123 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 98/98 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 97/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 46/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 1/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 72/170 variables, 98/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 71/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/170 variables, 0/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 170/170 variables, and 313 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved in 1356 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 98/98 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2489ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2490ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2643 ms. Remains : 98/98 places, 72/72 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 68 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-10
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 174 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 202 ms.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 13 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-10 finished in 3117 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 3 out of 98 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 72/72 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 98 transition count 71
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 97 transition count 71
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 96 transition count 70
Applied a total of 4 rules in 8 ms. Remains 96 /98 variables (removed 2) and now considering 70/72 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 70 rows 96 cols
[2024-05-28 20:23:56] [INFO ] Computed 46 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-28 20:23:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned [88, 89]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 72 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 94/98 places, 70/72 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 94 transition count 69
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 93 transition count 69
Applied a total of 2 rules in 4 ms. Remains 93 /94 variables (removed 1) and now considering 69/70 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 69 rows 93 cols
[2024-05-28 20:23:56] [INFO ] Computed 44 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-28 20:23:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned [82]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 64 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 92/98 places, 69/72 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 91 transition count 68
Applied a total of 2 rules in 4 ms. Remains 91 /92 variables (removed 1) and now considering 68/69 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 91 cols
[2024-05-28 20:23:56] [INFO ] Computed 43 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-28 20:23:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 20:23:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 20:23:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 75 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 148 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 3 : 91/98 places, 68/72 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 3 iterations and 300 ms. Remains : 91/98 places, 68/72 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 42 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-14
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 193 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 10 steps with 0 reset with depth 11 and stack size 11 in 1 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-14 finished in 547 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G(p0) U (G(!p1) U p2)))'
Support contains 8 out of 98 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 72/72 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 97 transition count 71
Applied a total of 2 rules in 4 ms. Remains 97 /98 variables (removed 1) and now considering 71/72 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 71 rows 97 cols
[2024-05-28 20:23:57] [INFO ] Computed 46 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-28 20:23:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned [90]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 76 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 96/98 places, 71/72 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 96 transition count 70
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 95 transition count 70
Applied a total of 2 rules in 4 ms. Remains 95 /96 variables (removed 1) and now considering 70/71 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 70 rows 95 cols
[2024-05-28 20:23:57] [INFO ] Computed 45 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-28 20:23:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 74 ms returned [82]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 80 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 94/98 places, 70/72 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 93 transition count 69
Applied a total of 2 rules in 7 ms. Remains 93 /94 variables (removed 1) and now considering 69/70 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 69 rows 93 cols
[2024-05-28 20:23:57] [INFO ] Computed 44 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-28 20:23:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 20:23:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 20:23:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 74 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 135 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 3 : 93/98 places, 69/72 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 3 iterations and 306 ms. Remains : 93/98 places, 69/72 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 227 ms :[(NOT p2), true, (NOT p0), p1, (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p0) p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-15
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 277 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-005A-LTLFireability-15 finished in 552 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 28346 ms.

BK_STOP 1716927837731

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldIIPt-PT-005A"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldIIPt-PT-005A, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r356-tall-171683760700244"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldIIPt-PT-005A.tgz
mv ShieldIIPt-PT-005A execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;