Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r356-tall-171683760600210.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..............
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldIIPt-PT-003A, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r356-tall-171683760600210
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 480K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.7K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 62K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.0K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 59K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.1K Apr 23 07:52 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 21K Apr 23 07:52 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K Apr 23 07:52 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Apr 23 07:52 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Apr 12 20:42 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 119K Apr 12 20:42 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.4K Apr 12 20:40 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 86K Apr 12 20:40 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Apr 23 07:52 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 23 07:52 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2023-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716925377187

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldIIPt-PT-003A
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-28 19:42:58] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-28 19:42:58] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-28 19:42:58] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 46 ms
[2024-05-28 19:42:58] [INFO ] Transformed 60 places.
[2024-05-28 19:42:58] [INFO ] Transformed 45 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:42:58] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-28 19:42:58] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 60 places and 45 transitions and 186 arcs in 138 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 14 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 1 transitions.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 60 out of 60 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 60/60 places, 44/44 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 44/44 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 60 cols
[2024-05-28 19:42:58] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 10 ms
[2024-05-28 19:42:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 185 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:42:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:42:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 73 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 292 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 43 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:42:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 59/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 28/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 44/104 variables, 60/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 104/104 variables, and 148 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved in 697 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 60/60 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 59/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 28/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 44/104 variables, 60/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 43/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 104/104 variables, and 191 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved in 575 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 60/60 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1316ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1331ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1648 ms. Remains : 60/60 places, 44/44 transitions.
Support contains 60 out of 60 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 44 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 68 to 58
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1432 ms. (27 steps per ms) remains 2/58 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 278 ms. (143 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 161 ms. (246 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
[2024-05-28 19:43:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Problem AtomicPropp63 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp38 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 14/104 variables, and 12 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved in 29 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 6/60 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/28 constraints, State Equation: 0/60 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 34ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 15 simplifications.
[2024-05-28 19:43:01] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2024-05-28 19:43:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-28 19:43:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 44 transitions.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 60/60 places, 44/44 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 44/44 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:43:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:43:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:43:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 56 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 118 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 43 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 59/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 28/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 44/104 variables, 60/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 104/104 variables, and 148 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved in 697 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 60/60 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 59/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 28/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 44/104 variables, 60/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 43/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 104/104 variables, and 191 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved in 620 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 60/60 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1330ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1331ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1452 ms. Remains : 60/60 places, 44/44 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 44 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2926114880446100102.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5663158694386771039.ctl : 4 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2926114880446100102.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5663158694386771039.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.24288e+08,0.086861,6344,2,156,5,12643,6,0,286,19641,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(EG(AG(EF((p18==1)))) U AG(EF(EX(((p1==1)&&(p18==1)))))) + ((EG(AX(((p44==1)&&(p53==1)))) * EX(((p58==1) * EF((p58==0))))) * AF((EX(EX(...195
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((Init * !(E(EG(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U (p18==1)))))) U !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U EX(((p1==1)&&(p18==1)))))))))) * ...537
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.115548,6596,1,0,17,12643,39,4,1529,19641,27
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 60/60 places, 44/44 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 60 transition count 43
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 59 transition count 43
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 58 transition count 42
Applied a total of 4 rules in 28 ms. Remains 58 /60 variables (removed 2) and now considering 42/44 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 42 rows 58 cols
[2024-05-28 19:43:02] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned [50, 51]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 78 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 56/60 places, 42/44 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 56 transition count 41
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 55 transition count 41
Applied a total of 2 rules in 6 ms. Remains 55 /56 variables (removed 1) and now considering 41/42 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 41 rows 55 cols
[2024-05-28 19:43:02] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 90 ms returned [44]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 93 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 54/60 places, 41/44 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 53 transition count 40
Applied a total of 2 rules in 7 ms. Remains 53 /54 variables (removed 1) and now considering 40/41 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 40 rows 53 cols
[2024-05-28 19:43:03] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:43:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:43:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 54 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 102 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 53/60 places, 40/44 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 317 ms. Remains : 53/60 places, 40/44 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 40 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13749721314789518309.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8888127716213181207.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13749721314789518309.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8888127716213181207.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.24288e+07,0.048006,5848,2,136,5,10263,6,0,254,15854,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG((EG(((p41==1)&&(p58==1))) * ((EF(((p46==1)&&(p57==1))) + (p16==1)) + ((p46==1)&&(p57==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),(EG(((p41==1)&&(p58==1))) * ((E(TRUE U ((p46==1)&&(p57==1))) + (p16==1)) + ((p46==1)&&(p57...173
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.069113,6112,1,0,13,10263,28,5,1345,15854,15
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 60/60 places, 44/44 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 44/44 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 60 cols
[2024-05-28 19:43:03] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 91 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:43:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:43:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 52 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 146 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 43 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 59/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 28/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 44/104 variables, 60/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 104/104 variables, and 148 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved in 511 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 60/60 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 59/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 28/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 44/104 variables, 60/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 43/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 104/104 variables, and 191 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved in 628 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 60/60 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1146ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1147ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1295 ms. Remains : 60/60 places, 44/44 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 44 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14413405901331738236.gal : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2737979720560346662.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14413405901331738236.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2737979720560346662.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.24288e+08,0.061125,6416,2,156,5,12643,6,0,286,19641,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EF(((EG(((p1==0)||(p18==0))) * E(((p45==1)&&(p47==1)) U (((p13==1)&&(p19==1))&&(p21==1)))) + AX((((p33==1)&&(p11==1))&&((p15==1)&&(p2...283
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((EG(((p1==0)||(p18==0))) * E(((p45==1)&&(p47==1)) U (((p13==1)&&(p19==1))&&(...358
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 39/4/5
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 41/2/3
(forward)formula 0,1,0.093029,6680,1,0,16,12643,40,3,1597,19641,21
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 60/60 places, 44/44 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 44/44 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:43:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:43:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:43:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 54 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 95 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 43 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 59/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 28/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 44/104 variables, 60/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 104/104 variables, and 148 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved in 506 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 60/60 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 59/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 28/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 44/104 variables, 60/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 43/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 104/104 variables, and 191 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved in 582 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 60/60 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1097ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1097ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1195 ms. Remains : 60/60 places, 44/44 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 44 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7780439472513721836.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3802640287028141866.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7780439472513721836.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3802640287028141866.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.24288e+08,0.060969,6416,2,156,5,12643,6,0,286,19641,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EF(((((p56==1)&&(p25==1))&&(p34==1))||(((p23==1)&&(p36==1))&&(p14==1)))) * EF(((AG(((p4==0)||(p17==0))) * EF(((p14==0)&&(p16==0)))) * (...464
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU((Init * (E(TRUE U ((((p56==1)&&(p25==1))&&(p34==1))||(((p23==1)&&(p36==1))&&(p14==1)))) * E(TRUE U ((!(...1262
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.138918,8000,1,0,21,22101,37,4,1562,22347,23
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 60/60 places, 44/44 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 44/44 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:43:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:43:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:43:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 53 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 110 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 43 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 59/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 28/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 44/104 variables, 60/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 104/104 variables, and 148 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved in 475 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 60/60 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 59/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 28/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 44/104 variables, 60/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 43/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 104/104 variables, and 191 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved in 582 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 60/60 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1064ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1065ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1178 ms. Remains : 60/60 places, 44/44 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 44 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10255790688450162496.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10756761144217897370.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10255790688450162496.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10756761144217897370.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.24288e+08,0.058306,6420,2,156,5,12643,6,0,286,19641,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!(((AG(A(AX(((p25==1)&&(p34==1))) U ((p33==1)||((p27==1)&&(p38==1))))) + AG((p18==1))) + AG(A((p39==1) U ((p3==1)&&(p20==1)))))) U EF(A...213
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(((!(EX(!((p52==1)))) * !(((p45==1)&&(p47==1)))) * (p52==1)))))))))) * !(E...686
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 34/5/10
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 38/0/6
(forward)formula 0,0,0.084977,6684,1,0,16,12643,46,3,1627,19641,31
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 60/60 places, 44/44 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 60 transition count 43
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 59 transition count 43
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 58 transition count 42
Applied a total of 4 rules in 10 ms. Remains 58 /60 variables (removed 2) and now considering 42/44 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 42 rows 58 cols
[2024-05-28 19:43:07] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned [50, 51]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 46 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 56/60 places, 42/44 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 56 transition count 41
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 55 transition count 41
Applied a total of 2 rules in 3 ms. Remains 55 /56 variables (removed 1) and now considering 41/42 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 41 rows 55 cols
[2024-05-28 19:43:07] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned [44]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 44 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 54/60 places, 41/44 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 53 transition count 40
Applied a total of 2 rules in 6 ms. Remains 53 /54 variables (removed 1) and now considering 40/41 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 40 rows 53 cols
[2024-05-28 19:43:07] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:43:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:43:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 69 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 111 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 53/60 places, 40/44 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 220 ms. Remains : 53/60 places, 40/44 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 40 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16806243274916583227.gal : 8 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15980179707608686606.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16806243274916583227.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15980179707608686606.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.24288e+07,0.048118,5848,2,136,5,10263,6,0,254,15854,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(((AG(((p5==0)||(p16==0))) + (p6==0)) + ((p15==0)||((p31==1)&&(p56==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(((!(E(TRUE U !(((p5==0)||(p16==0))))) + (p6==0)) + ((p15==0)||((p31==1)&&(p56==...174
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.064287,6112,1,0,10,10263,17,2,1245,15854,9
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 60/60 places, 44/44 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 44/44 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 60 cols
[2024-05-28 19:43:07] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:43:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:43:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 66 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 105 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 43 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 59/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 28/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 44/104 variables, 60/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 104/104 variables, and 148 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved in 466 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 60/60 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 59/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 28/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 44/104 variables, 60/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 43/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 104/104 variables, and 191 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved in 513 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 60/60 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 987ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 989ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1099 ms. Remains : 60/60 places, 44/44 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 44 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9131282335030663254.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3329667774653117663.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9131282335030663254.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3329667774653117663.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.24288e+08,0.058557,6412,2,156,5,12643,6,0,286,19641,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EF((EF((((p11==1)&&(p15==1))&&(p21==1))) * (E((p16==1) U ((p6==1)&&(p15==1))) + AG(((p25==1)&&(p34==1)))))) * (EF(((p6==1)&&(p15==1))...272
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (E(TRUE U (((p11==1)&&(p15==1))&&(p21==1))) * (E((p16==1) U ((p6==1)&&(p15==1)))...519
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 41/0/3
(forward)formula 0,1,0.078412,6676,1,0,10,12643,24,1,1448,19641,16
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 60/60 places, 44/44 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 44/44 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:43:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:43:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:43:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 51 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 91 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 43 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 59/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 28/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 44/104 variables, 60/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 104/104 variables, and 148 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved in 450 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 60/60 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 59/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 28/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 44/104 variables, 60/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 43/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 104/104 variables, and 191 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved in 534 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 60/60 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 991ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 993ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1089 ms. Remains : 60/60 places, 44/44 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 44 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6929432790588991716.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14635885763071169715.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6929432790588991716.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14635885763071169715.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.24288e+08,0.058319,6416,2,156,5,12643,6,0,286,19641,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(((A((((p30==1)&&(p34==1))&&(p40==1)) U ((p33==1)&&(p48==1))) * (p30==1)) * ((p34==1)&&(p40==1)))) + AX(EX(A(((((p41==1)&&(p58==1))||(...212
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * !(E(TRUE U ((!((E(!(((p33==1)&&(p48==1))) U (!((((p30==1)&&(p34==1))&&(p40==1))) * !(((p33==1)&&(p4...406
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 41/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 38/0/6
(forward)formula 0,0,0.082744,6680,1,0,18,12643,42,7,1595,19641,19
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 60/60 places, 44/44 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 44/44 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:43:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:43:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:43:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 46 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 86 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 43 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 59/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 28/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 44/104 variables, 60/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 104/104 variables, and 148 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved in 502 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 60/60 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 59/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 28/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 44/104 variables, 60/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 43/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 104/104 variables, and 191 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved in 538 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 60/60 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1050ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1051ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1138 ms. Remains : 60/60 places, 44/44 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 44 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15197158677227361943.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17897512332221467858.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15197158677227361943.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17897512332221467858.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.24288e+08,0.057979,6416,2,156,5,12643,6,0,286,19641,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((((EX((((p49==0)||(p53==0))||(p59==0))) * EG((((p11==1)&&(p15==1))&&(p21==1)))) * (((p14==1) + E((AX(((p4==1)&&(p17==1))) * A((((p30==...290
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((p43==0)||(p54==0))) * (EX((((p49==0)||(p53==0))||(p59==0))) * EG((((p11==1)&&(p15==1))...579
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 39/0/5
(forward)formula 0,1,0.08299,6680,1,0,21,12643,42,7,1563,19641,23
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 60/60 places, 44/44 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 44/44 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:43:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:43:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:43:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 57 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 97 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 43 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 59/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 28/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 44/104 variables, 60/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 104/104 variables, and 148 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved in 485 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 60/60 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 59/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 28/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 44/104 variables, 60/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 43/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 104/104 variables, and 191 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved in 537 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 60/60 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1030ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1030ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1129 ms. Remains : 60/60 places, 44/44 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 44 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5917810870431274522.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3805606863629535877.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5917810870431274522.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3805606863629535877.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.24288e+08,0.061746,6416,2,156,5,12643,6,0,286,19641,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(AX((EG(((p24==0)||(p35==0))) + AG((p33==0))))) + EF(((p50==1) * AX((AF((p0==1)) + AG((p54==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((EY(FwdU((Init * !(E(TRUE U ((p50==1) * !(EX(!((!(EG(!((p0==1)))) + !(E(TRUE U !((p54==1)))))))))))),TRUE...218
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.115679,7208,1,0,12,17082,36,7,1560,23063,19
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 60/60 places, 44/44 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 44/44 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:43:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:43:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:43:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 47 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 87 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 43 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 59/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 28/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 44/104 variables, 60/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 104/104 variables, and 148 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved in 449 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 60/60 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 59/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 28/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 44/104 variables, 60/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 43/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 104/104 variables, and 191 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved in 547 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 60/60 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1003ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1003ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1093 ms. Remains : 60/60 places, 44/44 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 44 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10106882060656077748.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17876569939406949985.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10106882060656077748.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17876569939406949985.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.24288e+08,0.059245,6412,2,156,5,12643,6,0,286,19641,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EF(!(((p7==1)&&(p9==1)))) U !(E(((AX((p33==1)) + AG((p35==1))) + ((!((p18==1)&&(p52==1)))||(p50==1))) U AG((((p54==1)||((p3==1)&&(p20==...198
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(E(((!(EX(!((p33==1)))) + !(E(TRUE U !((p35==1))))) + ((!((p18==1)&&(p52==1)))||(p50==1))) U !...669
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.077654,6676,1,0,10,12643,32,1,1544,19641,14
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 60/60 places, 44/44 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 44/44 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:43:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:43:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:43:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 50 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 92 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 43 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 59/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 28/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 44/104 variables, 60/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 104/104 variables, and 148 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved in 490 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 60/60 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 59/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 28/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 44/104 variables, 60/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 43/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 104/104 variables, and 191 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved in 546 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 60/60 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1046ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1047ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1141 ms. Remains : 60/60 places, 44/44 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 44 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16147832451923800674.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14810603580090157325.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16147832451923800674.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14810603580090157325.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.24288e+08,0.057863,6412,2,156,5,12643,6,0,286,19641,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EX(((p18==1)||(((p4==1)&&(p17==1))&&(((p22==0)||(p39==0))&&((p44==0)||(p53==0)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * ((p18==1)||(((p4==1)&&(p17==1))&&(((p22==0)||(p39==0))&&((p44==0)||(p53==0))))))] != FAL...157
(forward)formula 0,1,0.061362,6676,1,0,8,12643,8,1,531,19641,2
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 60/60 places, 44/44 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 44/44 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:43:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:43:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:43:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 46 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 87 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 43 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 59/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 28/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 44/104 variables, 60/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 104/104 variables, and 148 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved in 489 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 60/60 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 59/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 28/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 44/104 variables, 60/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 43/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 104/104 variables, and 191 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved in 538 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 60/60 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1036ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1036ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1124 ms. Remains : 60/60 places, 44/44 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 44 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4696447082743106007.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2858977915812112489.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4696447082743106007.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2858977915812112489.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.24288e+08,0.062662,6412,2,156,5,12643,6,0,286,19641,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(AX((p14==0))) * ((EF(!(E((((p13==1)&&(p19==1))&&(p21==1)) U ((p5==1)&&(p16==1))))) + AX(((!(E((p58==1) U ((p45==1)&&(p47==1)))) * (((...301
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(EG(!(EX(!((p14==0)))))))] = FALSE * (([(FwdU(EY(((Init * !(EG(!((E(!(((p43==1)&&(p54==1))) U (!(((p8...912
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 35/15/9
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,0.885671,42188,1,0,22,206739,41,6,1637,273486,18
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 60/60 places, 44/44 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 44/44 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:43:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:43:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:43:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 108 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 43 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 59/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 28/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 44/104 variables, 60/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 104/104 variables, and 148 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved in 472 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 60/60 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 59/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 28/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 44/104 variables, 60/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 43/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 104/104 variables, and 191 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved in 513 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 60/60 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 992ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 993ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1103 ms. Remains : 60/60 places, 44/44 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 44 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:43:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14597534106073760919.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1024435879086011049.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14597534106073760919.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1024435879086011049.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.24288e+08,0.057895,6416,2,156,5,12643,6,0,286,19641,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG((AX((p39==0)) + A(((p20==1)||((p45==1)&&(p47==1))) U (p0==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !((!(EX(!((p39==0)))) + !((E(!((p0==1)) U (!(((p20==1)||((p45==1)&&(p47==1)))) * !((p0==...194
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 43/0/1
(forward)formula 0,0,0.115078,7472,1,0,10,17748,32,5,1572,23850,17
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2024-05-28 19:43:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 19:43:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Total runtime 20003 ms.

BK_STOP 1716925398382

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldIIPt-PT-003A"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldIIPt-PT-003A, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r356-tall-171683760600210"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldIIPt-PT-003A.tgz
mv ShieldIIPt-PT-003A execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;