fond
Model Checking Contest 2024
14th edition, Geneva, Switzerland, June 25, 2024
Execution of r356-tall-171683760600196
Last Updated
July 7, 2024

About the Execution of ITS-Tools for ShieldIIPt-PT-002A

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
392.191 12729.00 23018.00 124.60 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFTF normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r356-tall-171683760600196.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
....................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldIIPt-PT-002A, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r356-tall-171683760600196
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 448K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 72K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.8K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 46K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.3K Apr 23 07:52 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 22K Apr 23 07:52 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K Apr 23 07:52 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Apr 23 07:52 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K Apr 12 20:44 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 127K Apr 12 20:44 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.4K Apr 12 20:43 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 63K Apr 12 20:43 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Apr 23 07:52 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 23 07:52 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716924603231

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldIIPt-PT-002A
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-28 19:30:04] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-28 19:30:04] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-28 19:30:04] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 38 ms
[2024-05-28 19:30:04] [INFO ] Transformed 41 places.
[2024-05-28 19:30:04] [INFO ] Transformed 31 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:30:04] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-28 19:30:04] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 41 places and 31 transitions and 126 arcs in 130 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 15 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 4 formulas.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 1 transitions.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 28 out of 41 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 41 /41 variables (removed 0) and now considering 30/30 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 30 rows 41 cols
[2024-05-28 19:30:04] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 9 ms
[2024-05-28 19:30:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 168 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:30:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:30:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 55 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 249 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 29 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:30:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 71/71 variables, and 101 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 429 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 29/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 71/71 variables, and 130 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 317 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 777ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 786ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1059 ms. Remains : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Support contains 28 out of 41 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-28 19:30:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2024-05-28 19:30:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-28 19:30:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 30 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 23 to 20
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 662 ms. (60 steps per ms) remains 1/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 191 ms. (208 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2024-05-28 19:30:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp12 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 7/71 variables, and 7 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 17 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 4/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/19 constraints, State Equation: 0/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 19ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 12 simplifications.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(X(F(p0)))))'
Support contains 2 out of 41 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 41 /41 variables (removed 0) and now considering 30/30 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:30:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:30:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:30:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:30:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 71 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 108 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 29 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:30:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 71/71 variables, and 101 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 283 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 29/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 71/71 variables, and 130 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 334 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 629ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 629ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 739 ms. Remains : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 269 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-00
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2206 reset in 314 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 56 steps with 1 reset with depth 40 and stack size 40 in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-00 finished in 1385 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 41 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 41 /41 variables (removed 0) and now considering 30/30 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:30:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:30:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:30:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:30:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 49 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 101 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 29 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:30:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 71/71 variables, and 101 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 271 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 29/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 71/71 variables, and 130 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 300 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 584ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 584ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 688 ms. Remains : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 62 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-01
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2835 reset in 143 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 19 steps with 0 reset with depth 20 and stack size 20 in 1 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-01 finished in 903 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F((p0||(p1 U p2)))))'
Support contains 5 out of 41 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 41 /41 variables (removed 0) and now considering 30/30 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:30:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:30:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:30:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:30:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 40 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 75 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 29 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:30:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 71/71 variables, and 101 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 269 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 29/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 71/71 variables, and 130 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 295 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 576ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 578ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 656 ms. Remains : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 73 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-02
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3850 reset in 121 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 29 steps with 0 reset with depth 30 and stack size 30 in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-02 finished in 870 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(G(p0))))'
Support contains 1 out of 41 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 41 /41 variables (removed 0) and now considering 30/30 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:30:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:30:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:30:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:30:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 42 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 92 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 29 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:30:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 71/71 variables, and 101 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 276 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 29/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 71/71 variables, and 130 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 300 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 589ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 591ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 686 ms. Remains : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 90 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-04
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 18 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-04 finished in 797 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((F(p0) U X((G(F(!p2))&&p1))))'
Support contains 5 out of 41 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 41 /41 variables (removed 0) and now considering 30/30 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:30:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:30:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:30:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:30:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 35 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 73 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 29 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:30:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 71/71 variables, and 101 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 259 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 29/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 71/71 variables, and 130 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 329 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 601ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 602ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 676 ms. Remains : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 394 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) p2), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) p2)), (OR (NOT p1) p2), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) p2), (AND (NOT p0) p2), p2, p2]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-05
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 19634 reset in 107 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 376 steps with 79 reset with depth 5 and stack size 5 in 1 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-05 finished in 1199 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((p0||X(G((p1&&F(p0)))))))'
Support contains 3 out of 41 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 41 /41 variables (removed 0) and now considering 30/30 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:30:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:30:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:30:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:30:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 37 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 74 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 29 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:30:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 71/71 variables, and 101 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 258 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 29/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 71/71 variables, and 130 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 288 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 551ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 551ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 627 ms. Remains : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 170 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), true, (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-06
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 25256 steps with 1773 reset in 25 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-06 finished in 840 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G(p0) U (F(p1) U X(X(G(!p2))))))'
Support contains 5 out of 41 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 41 /41 variables (removed 0) and now considering 30/30 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:30:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:30:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:30:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:30:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 36 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 77 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 29 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:30:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 71/71 variables, and 101 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 267 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 29/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 71/71 variables, and 130 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 275 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 547ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 549ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 629 ms. Remains : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 326 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) p2), (AND (NOT p1) p2 (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) p2), p2, (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) p2), p2, (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-07
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 24632 reset in 121 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 80452 steps with 19856 reset with depth 71 and stack size 71 in 117 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-07 finished in 1221 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F((p0||G((p1&&F(p2)))))))'
Support contains 7 out of 41 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 41 /41 variables (removed 0) and now considering 30/30 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:30:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:30:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:30:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:30:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 34 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 73 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 29 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:30:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 71/71 variables, and 101 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 252 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 29/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 71/71 variables, and 130 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 295 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 553ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 554ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 630 ms. Remains : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 122 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-10
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 7126 reset in 135 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 15 steps with 1 reset with depth 8 and stack size 8 in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-10 finished in 923 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((p0&&G(p1)&&X(G(p2)))))'
Support contains 4 out of 41 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 41 transition count 29
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 40 transition count 29
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 39 transition count 28
Applied a total of 4 rules in 20 ms. Remains 39 /41 variables (removed 2) and now considering 28/30 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 28 rows 39 cols
[2024-05-28 19:30:14] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:30:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned [31, 32]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 34 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 37/41 places, 28/30 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 37 transition count 27
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 36 transition count 27
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 36 /37 variables (removed 1) and now considering 27/28 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 27 rows 36 cols
[2024-05-28 19:30:14] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:30:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned [25]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 31 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 35/41 places, 27/30 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 34 transition count 26
Applied a total of 2 rules in 3 ms. Remains 34 /35 variables (removed 1) and now considering 26/27 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 26 rows 34 cols
[2024-05-28 19:30:14] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-28 19:30:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:30:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:30:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 40 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 68 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 3 : 34/41 places, 26/30 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 3 iterations and 158 ms. Remains : 34/41 places, 26/30 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 114 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p1), (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-11
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 162 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 8 steps with 0 reset with depth 9 and stack size 9 in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-11 finished in 454 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(p0))'
Support contains 2 out of 41 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 41 transition count 29
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 40 transition count 29
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 39 transition count 28
Applied a total of 4 rules in 7 ms. Remains 39 /41 variables (removed 2) and now considering 28/30 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 28 rows 39 cols
[2024-05-28 19:30:15] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-28 19:30:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned [31, 32]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 36 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 37/41 places, 28/30 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 37 transition count 27
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 36 transition count 27
Applied a total of 2 rules in 3 ms. Remains 36 /37 variables (removed 1) and now considering 27/28 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 27 rows 36 cols
[2024-05-28 19:30:15] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-28 19:30:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned [25]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 27 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 35/41 places, 27/30 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 34 transition count 26
Applied a total of 2 rules in 3 ms. Remains 34 /35 variables (removed 1) and now considering 26/27 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 26 rows 34 cols
[2024-05-28 19:30:15] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-28 19:30:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:30:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:30:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 39 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 72 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 3 : 34/41 places, 26/30 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 3 iterations and 148 ms. Remains : 34/41 places, 26/30 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 32 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-12
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1811 reset in 196 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 3 steps with 0 reset with depth 4 and stack size 4 in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-12 finished in 395 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F((!(p0 U ((p1 U p2)||p1))&&G(F(X(p3)))))))'
Support contains 5 out of 41 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 41 transition count 29
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 40 transition count 29
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 40 /41 variables (removed 1) and now considering 29/30 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 29 rows 40 cols
[2024-05-28 19:30:15] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-28 19:30:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned [31]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 39 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 39/41 places, 29/30 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 39 /39 variables (removed 0) and now considering 29/29 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 46 ms. Remains : 39/41 places, 29/30 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 128 ms :[(OR (NOT p3) p2 p1), (NOT p3), (OR p1 p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-15
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2641 reset in 130 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 1356 steps with 31 reset with depth 13 and stack size 13 in 3 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-15 finished in 325 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 11634 ms.

BK_STOP 1716924615960

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldIIPt-PT-002A"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldIIPt-PT-002A, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r356-tall-171683760600196"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldIIPt-PT-002A.tgz
mv ShieldIIPt-PT-002A execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;