Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r356-tall-171683760600194.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...............
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldIIPt-PT-002A, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r356-tall-171683760600194
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 448K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 72K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.8K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 46K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.3K Apr 23 07:52 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 22K Apr 23 07:52 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K Apr 23 07:52 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Apr 23 07:52 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K Apr 12 20:44 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 127K Apr 12 20:44 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.4K Apr 12 20:43 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 63K Apr 12 20:43 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Apr 23 07:52 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 23 07:52 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2023-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716924578183

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldIIPt-PT-002A
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-28 19:29:39] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-28 19:29:39] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-28 19:29:39] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 37 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:39] [INFO ] Transformed 41 places.
[2024-05-28 19:29:39] [INFO ] Transformed 31 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:29:39] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-28 19:29:39] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 41 places and 31 transitions and 126 arcs in 126 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 13 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 2 formulas.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 1 transitions.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2024-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 40 out of 41 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 13 ms. Remains 41 /41 variables (removed 0) and now considering 30/30 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 30 rows 41 cols
[2024-05-28 19:29:39] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 8 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 219 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:29:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:29:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 106 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 369 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 29 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:29:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 71/71 variables, and 101 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 470 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 29/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 71/71 variables, and 130 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 381 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 897ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 910ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1309 ms. Remains : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Support contains 40 out of 41 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-28 19:29:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 30 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 42 to 34
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 708 ms. (56 steps per ms) remains 1/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 138 ms. (287 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2024-05-28 19:29:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp16 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 10/71 variables, and 8 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 22 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 4/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/19 constraints, State Equation: 0/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 28ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 14 simplifications.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2024-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-28 19:29:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 30 transitions.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 41 /41 variables (removed 0) and now considering 30/30 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:29:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:29:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:29:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:29:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 44 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 81 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 29 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:29:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 71/71 variables, and 101 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 313 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 29/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 71/71 variables, and 130 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 318 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 643ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 643ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 726 ms. Remains : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:29:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 30 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:29:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5908907351417029556.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11767527132892829783.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5908907351417029556.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11767527132892829783.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,819201,0.05327,5408,2,106,5,9405,6,0,196,14984,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EX(((!(A(!(((p5==1)&&(p16==1))) U !(((p6==1)&&(p15==1))))) * EG((((p13==1)&&(p19==1))&&(p21==1)))) * ((p4==1)&&(p17==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(((EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * ((p4==1)&&(p17==1))) * !(!((E(!(!(((p6==1)&&(p15==1)))) U (!(!(((p5==1)&&(p16==1))...267
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 21/15/9
(forward)formula 0,1,0.064741,5924,1,0,12,9405,30,3,1070,14984,14
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2024-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 41 /41 variables (removed 0) and now considering 30/30 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:29:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:29:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:29:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:29:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 45 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 82 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 29 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:29:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 71/71 variables, and 101 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 281 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 29/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 71/71 variables, and 130 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 318 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 609ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 615ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 698 ms. Remains : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 30 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8731436945759078423.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6004843209846693621.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8731436945759078423.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6004843209846693621.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,819201,0.043253,5476,2,106,5,9405,6,0,196,14984,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EX(AX((p16==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(EX(!((p16==1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.04873,5740,1,0,6,9405,11,0,924,14984,4
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2024-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 40 transition count 28
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 38 transition count 28
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 36 transition count 27
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 36 transition count 26
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 35 transition count 26
Applied a total of 8 rules in 24 ms. Remains 35 /41 variables (removed 6) and now considering 26/30 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 26 rows 35 cols
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned [24]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 38 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 34/41 places, 26/30 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 33 transition count 25
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 33 /34 variables (removed 1) and now considering 25/26 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 25 rows 33 cols
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 47 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 93 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 33/41 places, 25/30 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 158 ms. Remains : 33/41 places, 25/30 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 25 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4806923588332764003.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15684646028988811028.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4806923588332764003.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15684646028988811028.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,81920,0.013527,4100,2,64,5,2835,6,0,160,3838,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(AG(((!(E((p18==1) U ((p7==1)&&(p9==1)))) * (p7==1)) * (p9==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(((!(E((p18==1) U ((p7==1)&&(p9==1)))) * (p7==1)) * (p9==1)))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 21/0/4
(forward)formula 0,0,0.020844,4364,1,0,12,2835,29,3,813,3838,12
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2024-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 40 transition count 29
Applied a total of 2 rules in 3 ms. Remains 40 /41 variables (removed 1) and now considering 29/30 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 29 rows 40 cols
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned [33]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 50 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 39/41 places, 29/30 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 39 transition count 28
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 38 transition count 28
Applied a total of 2 rules in 4 ms. Remains 38 /39 variables (removed 1) and now considering 28/29 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 28 rows 38 cols
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 5 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned [25]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 45 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 37/41 places, 28/30 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 36 transition count 27
Applied a total of 2 rules in 3 ms. Remains 36 /37 variables (removed 1) and now considering 27/28 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 27 rows 36 cols
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 40 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 79 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 36/41 places, 27/30 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 185 ms. Remains : 36/41 places, 27/30 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 27 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9318823496096999993.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12420845028414774170.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9318823496096999993.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12420845028414774170.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,163841,0.023918,4384,2,200,5,4801,6,0,173,6112,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF((p31==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (p31==1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.034115,4648,1,0,6,4801,14,0,848,6112,5
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2024-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 41 transition count 29
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 40 transition count 29
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 39 transition count 28
Applied a total of 4 rules in 7 ms. Remains 39 /41 variables (removed 2) and now considering 28/30 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 28 rows 39 cols
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned [31, 32]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 33 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 37/41 places, 28/30 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 37 transition count 27
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 36 transition count 27
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 36 /37 variables (removed 1) and now considering 27/28 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 27 rows 36 cols
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned [25]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 31 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 35/41 places, 27/30 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 34 transition count 26
Applied a total of 2 rules in 9 ms. Remains 34 /35 variables (removed 1) and now considering 26/27 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 26 rows 34 cols
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 37 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 67 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 34/41 places, 26/30 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 150 ms. Remains : 34/41 places, 26/30 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 26 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15970472112790643507.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13424142171479141898.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15970472112790643507.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13424142171479141898.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,81921,0.024756,4116,2,168,5,3936,6,0,164,5126,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(((((p11==1)&&(p15==1))&&((p21==1)&&(p35==0))) * ((!(A(((p14==1)&&(p29==1)) U (p0==1))) + EF(((p8==0)||(p19==0)))) * ((p18==1)||(p6=...163
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(((((p11==1)&&(p15==1))&&((p21==1)&&(p35==0))) * ((!(!((E(!((p0==1)) U (!(((p14=...276
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 25/0/1
(forward)formula 0,0,0.040516,4644,1,0,12,4892,31,4,914,5126,17
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2024-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 41 transition count 29
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 40 transition count 29
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 40 /41 variables (removed 1) and now considering 29/30 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 29 rows 40 cols
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned [31]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 42 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 39/41 places, 29/30 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 39 /39 variables (removed 0) and now considering 29/29 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 46 ms. Remains : 39/41 places, 29/30 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 29 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1994458353659770677.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13678981627454795145.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1994458353659770677.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13678981627454795145.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,409601,0.039736,5464,2,101,5,8368,6,0,187,13522,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(E((p20==1) U EF(EG(((p27==1)&&(p38==1))))) U ((p25==1)&&(p34==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,E((p20==1) U E(TRUE U EG(((p27==1)&&(p38==1)))))) * ((p25==1)&&(p34==1)))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 25/0/4
(forward)formula 0,1,0.090749,6784,1,0,11,15278,31,1,1029,20872,15
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2024-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 41 transition count 29
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 40 transition count 29
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 39 transition count 28
Applied a total of 4 rules in 3 ms. Remains 39 /41 variables (removed 2) and now considering 28/30 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 28 rows 39 cols
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned [31, 32]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 33 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 37/41 places, 28/30 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 37 transition count 27
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 36 transition count 27
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 36 /37 variables (removed 1) and now considering 27/28 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 27 rows 36 cols
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned [25]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 36 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 35/41 places, 27/30 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 34 transition count 26
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 34 /35 variables (removed 1) and now considering 26/27 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 26 rows 34 cols
[2024-05-28 19:29:44] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:29:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:29:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 36 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 69 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 34/41 places, 26/30 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 145 ms. Remains : 34/41 places, 26/30 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:29:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 26 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:29:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14618205584266597986.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13241946456404907138.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14618205584266597986.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13241946456404907138.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,81921,0.0178,4380,2,168,5,3936,6,0,164,5126,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG(AG((((p37==1)&&(p8==1))&&(p19==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(E(TRUE U !((((p37==1)&&(p8==1))&&(p19==1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.02955,4644,1,0,7,4296,21,0,881,5126,8
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2024-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 41 /41 variables (removed 0) and now considering 30/30 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 30 rows 41 cols
[2024-05-28 19:29:44] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:29:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:29:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 50 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 81 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 29 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:29:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 71/71 variables, and 101 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 298 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 29/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 71/71 variables, and 130 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 315 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 625ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 626ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 708 ms. Remains : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:29:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 30 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:29:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12522182820305700976.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6451772915374596311.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12522182820305700976.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6451772915374596311.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,819201,0.051925,5480,2,106,5,9405,6,0,196,14984,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((p33==1) U ((!(EF((p18==1))) * EX(EX((p37==1)))) * (AF(!(E((((p11==1)&&(p15==1))&&(p21==1)) U ((p7==1)&&(p9==1))))) * (((!((EF(((p7==1)...360
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([((((FwdU(Init,(p33==1)) * (!(E(TRUE U (p18==1))) * EX(EX((p37==1))))) * !(EG(!(!(E((((p11==1)&&(p15==1))&&(p...1058
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 21/15/9
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,0.085052,6272,1,0,24,11185,42,1,1134,14984,25
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2024-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 41 /41 variables (removed 0) and now considering 30/30 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:29:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:29:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:29:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:29:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 42 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 82 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 29 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:29:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 71/71 variables, and 101 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 315 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 29/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 71/71 variables, and 130 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 338 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 659ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 660ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 744 ms. Remains : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:29:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 30 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:29:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability658833572347705005.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17556965274132290201.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability658833572347705005.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17556965274132290201.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,819201,0.043821,5480,2,106,5,9405,6,0,196,14984,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AG((((p22==1)&&(p39==1))||((p12==1)&&(p37==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * !((((p22==1)&&(p39==1))||((p12==1)&&(p37==1)))))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 0,0,0.069895,5744,1,0,10,9497,10,2,392,15144,4
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2024-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 41 /41 variables (removed 0) and now considering 30/30 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:29:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:29:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:29:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:29:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 40 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 85 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 29 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:29:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 71/71 variables, and 101 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 297 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 29/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 71/71 variables, and 130 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 328 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 631ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 632ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 717 ms. Remains : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:29:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 30 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:29:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14509831755599889995.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17222390065283233060.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14509831755599889995.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17222390065283233060.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,819201,0.052523,5480,2,106,5,9405,6,0,196,14984,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((E((!(((!((p27==1)&&(p38==1)))&&(!((p7==1)&&(p9==1))))) * A((p18!=1) U AG(((p23==1)&&(p36==1))))) U AG(EX(((p2==1)&&(p10==1))))) + !(((...362
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(EX(!((E(!(!((E(!(!(((p26==1)&&(p28==1)))) U (!(!(EX(!(((p4==1)&&(p17==1)))))) * !(!(((p26==1)&&...1874
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 27/2/3
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,0.105883,6536,1,0,27,13133,41,20,1102,17557,32
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2024-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 41 /41 variables (removed 0) and now considering 30/30 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:29:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:29:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:29:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:29:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 55 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 91 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 29 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:29:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 71/71 variables, and 101 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 291 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 29/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 71/71 variables, and 130 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 285 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 581ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 582ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 675 ms. Remains : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:29:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 30 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:29:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11873580427490305611.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4491951597654832345.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11873580427490305611.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4491951597654832345.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,819201,0.046121,5480,2,106,5,9405,6,0,196,14984,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(E((!(A(!(((p2==1)&&(p10==1))) U EG(((p1==1)&&(p18==1))))) * !(EF((p33==1)))) U !(((((p6==1)&&(p15==1)) + (AX((p33==1)) * A((p18==1) U ...253
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E((!(!((E(!(EG(((p1==1)&&(p18==1)))) U (!(!(((p2==1)&&(p10==1)))) * !(EG(((p1==1)&&(p18==1)))))) + ...490
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 21/0/9
(forward)formula 0,1,0.068299,5744,1,0,16,9405,40,5,1079,14984,25
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 41 /41 variables (removed 0) and now considering 30/30 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:29:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:29:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:29:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:29:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 39 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 74 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-28 19:29:47] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 29 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:29:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 71/71 variables, and 101 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 275 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 29/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 71/71 variables, and 130 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 324 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 603ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 604ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 689 ms. Remains : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:29:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 30 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:29:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10258984971310286556.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4387474621335067795.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10258984971310286556.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4387474621335067795.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,819201,0.044213,5480,2,106,5,9405,6,0,196,14984,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AG((p20==0)) + EG(AF((((p7==1)&&(p9==1))||((p25==1)&&(p34==1)))))) + AG((p31==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !((!(E(TRUE U !((p20==0)))) + EG(!(EG(!((((p7==1)&&(p9==1))||((p25==1)&&(p34==1)))))))))),TRUE) *...177
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,0.117744,8120,1,0,12,22575,33,5,1096,31424,14
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 41 /41 variables (removed 0) and now considering 30/30 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:29:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:29:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:29:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:29:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 40 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 80 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 29 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:29:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 71/71 variables, and 101 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 288 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 29/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 71/71 variables, and 130 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 331 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 628ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 628ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 710 ms. Remains : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:29:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 30 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:29:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5457172051184829044.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10678257743430796247.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5457172051184829044.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10678257743430796247.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,819201,0.052628,5476,2,106,5,9405,6,0,196,14984,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EF((((p11==1)&&(p15==1)) * ((p21==1) * (EF(((p1==0)||(p18==0))) + ((EF(((p23==1)&&(p36==1))) * AF(((p8==1)&&(p19==1)))) * EF(((p6==1)&...172
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(((FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * ((p11==1)&&(p15==1))) * (p21==1)),TRUE) * ((p1==0)||(p18==0)))] != FALSE + [(Fwd...323
(forward)formula 0,1,0.080577,5740,1,0,12,10098,11,3,385,15868,8
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2024-05-28 19:29:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 19:29:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
Total runtime 9775 ms.

BK_STOP 1716924589235

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldIIPt-PT-002A"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldIIPt-PT-002A, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r356-tall-171683760600194"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldIIPt-PT-002A.tgz
mv ShieldIIPt-PT-002A execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;