Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r356-tall-171683760200034.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldIIPs-PT-003A, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r356-tall-171683760200034
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 504K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.7K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 60K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.0K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 45K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.3K Apr 23 07:51 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 23K Apr 23 07:51 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.0K May 19 07:30 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K May 19 18:59 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K Apr 11 14:35 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 160K Apr 11 14:35 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.8K Apr 11 14:33 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 80K Apr 11 14:33 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Apr 23 07:51 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 23 07:51 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2023-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716876755148

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldIIPs-PT-003A
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-28 06:12:36] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-28 06:12:36] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-28 06:12:36] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 57 ms
[2024-05-28 06:12:36] [INFO ] Transformed 78 places.
[2024-05-28 06:12:36] [INFO ] Transformed 75 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:12:36] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-28 06:12:36] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 78 places and 75 transitions and 330 arcs in 154 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 12 ms.
Support contains 68 out of 78 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 75/75 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 78 /78 variables (removed 0) and now considering 75/75 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 75 rows 78 cols
[2024-05-28 06:12:36] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 6 ms
[2024-05-28 06:12:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 196 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 06:12:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 06:12:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 101 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 324 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 74 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:12:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 28/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:12:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 47 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:12:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:12:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 3/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 75/153 variables, 78/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:12:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 56 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 1/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:12:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 93 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:12:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 45 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 2/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:12:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 104 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:12:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 2/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/153 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 153/153 variables, and 192 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved in 2912 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 28/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 8/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 75/153 variables, 78/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 74/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:12:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 1/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/153 variables, 0/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 153/153 variables, and 267 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved in 4321 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 7290ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7324ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7684 ms. Remains : 78/78 places, 75/75 transitions.
Support contains 68 out of 78 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-28 06:12:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2024-05-28 06:12:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-28 06:12:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 75 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 60 to 59
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (210 resets) in 1210 ms. (33 steps per ms) remains 1/59 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (44 resets) in 203 ms. (196 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2024-05-28 06:12:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp51 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 27/153 variables, and 17 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 40 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 9/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/28 constraints, State Equation: 0/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 55ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2024-05-28 06:12:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-28 06:12:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-28 06:12:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 75 transitions.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 75/75 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 78 /78 variables (removed 0) and now considering 75/75 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:12:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 06:12:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 88 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 06:12:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 06:12:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 148 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 239 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 74 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:12:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 28/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:12:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:12:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:12:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 3/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 75/153 variables, 78/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:12:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 1/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 76 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 2/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 2/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/153 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 153/153 variables, and 192 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved in 2532 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 28/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 8/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 75/153 variables, 78/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 74/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:12:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 1/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/153 variables, 0/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 153/153 variables, and 267 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved in 3959 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 6510ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6514ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6756 ms. Remains : 78/78 places, 75/75 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:12:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-28 06:12:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-28 06:12:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 75 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:12:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-28 06:12:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-28 06:12:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17332251196085254086.gal : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 06:12:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5602655219571386186.ctl : 6 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17332251196085254086.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5602655219571386186.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.11657e+11,3.19372,95800,2,7090,5,288417,6,0,389,657344,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((AF(EG(((p29==1)&&(p44==1)))) * (AF(EG((p25==1))) + ((!(A(((p28==1)&&(p49==1)) U ((p31==1)&&(p41==1)))) * AG(((p54==0)||(p69==0)))) *...305
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(EG(((p29==1)&&(p44==1)))))] = FALSE * (([(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(!(EG(!(EG((p25==1)))))...732
(forward)formula 0,0,3.23367,95800,1,0,11,288417,11,4,726,657344,3
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 75/75 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 78 /78 variables (removed 0) and now considering 75/75 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:12:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 06:12:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 06:12:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 06:12:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 84 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 152 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 74 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:12:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 28/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:12:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 42 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 3/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 75/153 variables, 78/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 1/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 2/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:12:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 2/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/153 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 153/153 variables, and 192 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved in 2136 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 28/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 8/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 75/153 variables, 78/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 74/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:12:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 1/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/153 variables, 0/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 153/153 variables, and 267 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved in 3664 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 5814ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5815ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5969 ms. Remains : 78/78 places, 75/75 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:13:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 06:13:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 06:13:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 75 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:13:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 06:13:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 06:13:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7194057134073486935.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:13:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11532881353164159100.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7194057134073486935.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11532881353164159100.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.11657e+11,3.25482,96396,2,7090,5,288417,6,0,389,657344,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(E(EG(!((AF(((p32==1)&&(p34==1))) * !(((p53==1)&&(p74==1)))))) U AF((((p38==1)&&(p48==1))&&(p50==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(EG(!((!(EG(!(((p32==1)&&(p34==1))))) * !(((p53==1)&&(p74==1)))))) U !(EG(!((((p38==1)&&(p48==1)...182
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...380
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-28 06:13:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 06:13:31] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-28 06:13:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12435125846936639551.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12435125846936639551.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12435125846936639551.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12435125846936639551.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12435125846936639551.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-28 06:13:31] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-28 06:13:31] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-28 06:13:31] [INFO ] Removed a total of 48 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:13:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 35 ms
[2024-05-28 06:13:31] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 48 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2024-05-28 06:13:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16179019126972288895.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 06:13:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12112989321643126849.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16179019126972288895.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12112989321643126849.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.11657e+11,8.1124,167072,984,30,215078,127,165,834594,32,556,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(E(EG(!((AF(((i5.u11.p32==1)&&(i4.u12.p34==1))) * !(((i7.u19.p53==1)&&(i6.u27.p74==1)))))) U AF((((i4.u14.p38==1)&&(i4.u17.p48==1))&&(i...172
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(EG(!((!(EG(!(((i5.u11.p32==1)&&(i4.u12.p34==1))))) * !(((i7.u19.p53==1)&&(i6.u27.p74==1)))))) U...231
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t7, t14, t43, t54, t72, i0.t63, i0.u6.t1, i0.u6.t2, i2.t73, i2.t60, i2.u8.t3, i2.u8.t4, i...474
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 75/75 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 78 /78 variables (removed 0) and now considering 75/75 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:14:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 06:14:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 77 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 06:14:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 06:14:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 81 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 161 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 74 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:14:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 28/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:14:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:14:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:14:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 3/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 75/153 variables, 78/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:14:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 1/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 2/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 2/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/153 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 153/153 variables, and 192 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved in 2118 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 28/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 8/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 75/153 variables, 78/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 74/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:14:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 1/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/153 variables, 0/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 153/153 variables, and 267 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved in 3816 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 5947ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5950ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6115 ms. Remains : 78/78 places, 75/75 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:14:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-28 06:14:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-28 06:14:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 75 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:14:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 06:14:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 06:14:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5925664811394862515.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:14:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12912522903717043144.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5925664811394862515.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12912522903717043144.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.11657e+11,2.98554,95316,2,7090,5,288417,6,0,389,657344,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AG((((AX((p0==0)) + (p12==0)) + ((p45==0)||(p36==0))) + ((p42==0)||(p51==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(TRUE U !((((!(EX(!((p0==0)))) + (p12==0)) + ((p45==0)||(p36==0))) + ((p42==0)||(p51==0)))))))] !=...161
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...380
(forward)formula 0,1,13.7497,347808,1,0,322,1.64832e+06,177,83,2994,2.29557e+06,281
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 75/75 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 77 transition count 74
Applied a total of 2 rules in 14 ms. Remains 77 /78 variables (removed 1) and now considering 74/75 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 77 cols
[2024-05-28 06:14:21] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:14:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 06:14:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 06:14:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 78 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 141 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-28 06:14:21] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 18 ms returned []
Running 73 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:14:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 76/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/77 variables, 28/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 1/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:14:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:14:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:14:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 3/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 74/151 variables, 77/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/151 variables, 1/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 0/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/151 variables, 0/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 151/151 variables, and 186 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved in 1903 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 77/77 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 77/77 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 73/73 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 76/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/77 variables, 28/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 1/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 4/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 74/151 variables, 77/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 73/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 0/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/151 variables, 0/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 151/151 variables, and 259 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved in 1753 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 77/77 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 77/77 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 73/73 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 3694ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3696ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 77/78 places, 74/75 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3877 ms. Remains : 77/78 places, 74/75 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:14:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-28 06:14:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 06:14:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 74 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:14:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 06:14:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 06:14:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5095388374030950059.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 06:14:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11934584332670562500.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5095388374030950059.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11934584332670562500.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.57183e+11,3.27258,97704,2,7380,5,287686,6,0,384,687082,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((((((p11==0)||(p17==0))||(p27==0))&&(((p8==1)&&(p22==1))||(((p61==1)&&(p65==1))&&(p76==1))))||((((p13==0)||(p21==0))||(p25==0))&&(((p...312
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((((((p11==0)||(p17==0))||(p27==0))&&(((p8==1)&&(p22==1))||(((p61==1)&&(p65==1))&&(p76==1))))||((((p1...367
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t27, t33...375
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-28 06:14:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 06:14:55] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-28 06:14:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15415536586444184960.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15415536586444184960.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15415536586444184960.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15415536586444184960.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15415536586444184960.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-28 06:14:55] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-28 06:14:55] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-28 06:14:55] [INFO ] Removed a total of 48 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:14:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-28 06:14:55] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 50 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2024-05-28 06:14:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14457527091167455151.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 06:14:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5937828326420016446.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14457527091167455151.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5937828326420016446.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.57183e+11,6.57131,122232,1088,28,138740,125,190,604871,34,557,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((((((i0.u4.p11==0)||(i0.u6.p17==0))||(i2.u9.p27==0))&&(((i2.u3.p8==1)&&(i2.u8.p22==1))||(((i6.i1.u22.p61==1)&&(i6.i1.u24.p65==1))&&(i...477
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((((((i0.u4.p11==0)||(i0.u6.p17==0))||(i2.u9.p27==0))&&(((i2.u3.p8==1)&&(i2.u8.p22==1))||(((i6.i1.u22...532
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t7, t14, t34, t48, t66, i0.t56, i0.u6.t1, i0.u6.t2, i2.t61, i2.t54, i2.u8.t3, i2.u8.t4, i...480
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 75/75 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 78 transition count 74
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 77 transition count 74
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 76 transition count 73
Applied a total of 4 rules in 11 ms. Remains 76 /78 variables (removed 2) and now considering 73/75 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 73 rows 76 cols
[2024-05-28 06:15:25] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-28 06:15:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned [62]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 64 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 75/78 places, 73/75 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 75 /75 variables (removed 0) and now considering 73/73 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 78 ms. Remains : 75/78 places, 73/75 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:15:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 06:15:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 06:15:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 73 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:15:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 06:15:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 06:15:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16988775638196958883.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 06:15:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability315360802765932845.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16988775638196958883.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability315360802765932845.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.85913e+10,3.38824,99252,2,6850,5,291570,6,0,375,711597,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(AF((((((((p13==1)&&(p23==1))&&(p27==1)) + EF((p22==1))) + AF((((p61==1)&&(p65==1))&&(p76==1)))) * (p7==1)) * (p9==1))) U (p41==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((FwdU(Init,!((p41==1))) * !((p41==1))),!((((((((p13==1)&&(p23==1))&&(p27==1)) + E(TRUE U (p22==1))) + !(E...266
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 69/0/4
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t26, t33...375
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-28 06:15:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-28 06:15:55] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-28 06:15:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18011809073285263348.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18011809073285263348.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18011809073285263348.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18011809073285263348.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18011809073285263348.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-28 06:15:55] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-28 06:15:55] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-28 06:15:56] [INFO ] Removed a total of 45 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:15:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-28 06:15:56] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 48 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-28 06:15:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11220957684845246080.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 06:15:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11042413293628536915.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11220957684845246080.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11042413293628536915.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.85913e+10,9.98814,165372,1041,31,186641,219,178,924605,33,1590,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(AF((((((((i2.u5.p13==1)&&(i2.u8.p23==1))&&(i2.u9.p27==1)) + EF((i2.u8.p22==1))) + AF((((i7.u22.p61==1)&&(i7.u23.p65==1))&&(i8.u26.p76...217
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((FwdU(Init,!((i4.u15.p41==1))) * !((i4.u15.p41==1))),!((((((((i2.u5.p13==1)&&(i2.u8.p23==1))&&(i2.u9.p27=...344
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t7, t14, t32, t44, t61, i0.t52, i0.u6.t1, i0.u6.t2, i2.t62, i2.t50, i2.u8.t3, i2.u8.t4, i...462
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 75/75 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 78 transition count 74
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 77 transition count 74
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 76 transition count 73
Applied a total of 4 rules in 7 ms. Remains 76 /78 variables (removed 2) and now considering 73/75 (removed 2) transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:16:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 06:16:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned [62]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 77 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 75/78 places, 73/75 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 75 /75 variables (removed 0) and now considering 73/73 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 88 ms. Remains : 75/78 places, 73/75 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:16:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 06:16:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 06:16:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 73 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:16:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 06:16:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 06:16:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8824551458469616901.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:16:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2238293035521664795.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8824551458469616901.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2238293035521664795.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.85913e+10,2.9341,100860,2,6850,5,291570,6,0,375,711597,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG(((p2==0)||(p10==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),((p2==0)||(p10==0)))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 66/0/7
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-28 06:16:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-28 06:16:56] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-28 06:16:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12218700949742932728.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12218700949742932728.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12218700949742932728.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12218700949742932728.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12218700949742932728.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-28 06:16:56] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-28 06:16:56] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-28 06:16:56] [INFO ] Removed a total of 45 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:16:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2024-05-28 06:16:56] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 50 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2024-05-28 06:16:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10170566272734405347.gal : 22 ms
[2024-05-28 06:16:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7813482433674377249.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10170566272734405347.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7813482433674377249.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.85913e+10,8.01396,142812,1157,29,196357,214,200,645544,33,1505,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG(((i1.u0.p2==0)||(i0.i0.u4.p10==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),((i1.u0.p2==0)||(i0.i0.u4.p10==0)))] != FALSE
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 75/75 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 78 transition count 74
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 77 transition count 74
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 76 transition count 73
Applied a total of 4 rules in 12 ms. Remains 76 /78 variables (removed 2) and now considering 73/75 (removed 2) transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:17:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 06:17:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned [62]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 59 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 75/78 places, 73/75 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 75 /75 variables (removed 0) and now considering 73/73 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 75 ms. Remains : 75/78 places, 73/75 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:17:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 06:17:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 06:17:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 73 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:17:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 06:17:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 06:17:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4237027011388184994.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:17:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11267126821466360673.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4237027011388184994.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11267126821466360673.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.85913e+10,3.01579,99404,2,6850,5,291570,6,0,375,711597,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF((((p13==1)&&(p23==1))&&(p27==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (((p13==1)&&(p23==1))&&(p27==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t26, t33...375
(forward)formula 0,0,27.8035,779984,1,0,280,3.55882e+06,167,118,2784,5.8452e+06,254
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 75/75 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 77 transition count 73
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 75 transition count 73
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 74 transition count 72
Applied a total of 5 rules in 13 ms. Remains 74 /78 variables (removed 4) and now considering 72/75 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 74 cols
[2024-05-28 06:17:54] [INFO ] Computed 27 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-28 06:17:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 74 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 06:17:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 06:17:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 72 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 148 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-28 06:17:54] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 15 ms returned [64]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 70 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 71 rows 74 cols
[2024-05-28 06:17:54] [INFO ] Computed 27 invariants in 0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 74/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 27/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:17:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:17:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 3/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 71/145 variables, 74/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 3/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 3/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:17:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:17:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 2/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/145 variables, 0/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 145/145 variables, and 186 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved in 2414 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 74/74 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 74/74 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 70/70 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 74/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 27/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 11/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 71/145 variables, 74/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 70/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 2/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 1/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/145 variables, 0/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 145/145 variables, and 259 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved in 2111 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 74/74 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 74/74 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 70/70 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints]
After SMT, in 4543ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4544ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 74/78 places, 71/75 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 74 /74 variables (removed 0) and now considering 71/71 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 4734 ms. Remains : 74/78 places, 71/75 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:17:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-28 06:17:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 06:17:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 71 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:17:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 06:17:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 06:17:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4439065959568139835.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 06:17:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7589770471986204604.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4439065959568139835.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7589770471986204604.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.85913e+10,1.72326,55824,2,3916,5,184078,6,0,370,382089,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((p16==0))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(p16==0))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 67/0/4
(forward)formula 0,1,9.60524,284512,1,0,111,1.27129e+06,19,4,2024,2.0861e+06,108
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2024-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 75/75 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 78 /78 variables (removed 0) and now considering 75/75 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 75 rows 78 cols
[2024-05-28 06:18:08] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-28 06:18:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 06:18:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 06:18:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 80 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 150 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 74 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:18:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 28/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:18:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:18:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:18:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 3/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 75/153 variables, 78/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:18:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 1/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:18:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:18:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 2/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:18:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:18:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 2/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/153 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 153/153 variables, and 192 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved in 2140 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 28/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 8/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 75/153 variables, 78/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 74/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:18:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 1/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/153 variables, 0/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 153/153 variables, and 267 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved in 3884 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 6041ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6042ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6200 ms. Remains : 78/78 places, 75/75 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:18:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-28 06:18:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 06:18:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 75 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:18:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 06:18:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 06:18:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability887683921777341727.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 06:18:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18047056667101054924.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability887683921777341727.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18047056667101054924.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.11657e+11,2.97696,95080,2,7090,5,288417,6,0,389,657344,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((!(A(AX(EX((((p13==1)&&(p21==1))&&(p25==1)))) U A((p71!=1) U !((((p61==1)&&(p67==1))&&(p77==1)))))) + EX(EF((((p13==1)&&(p23==1))&&(p2...165
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([(FwdU((FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(!((E(!(!((((p61==1)&&(p67==1))&&(p77==1)))) U (!((p71!=1)) * !(!((((p61==1)&&(...945
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...380
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-28 06:18:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 06:18:45] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-28 06:18:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3311549252274847228.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3311549252274847228.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3311549252274847228.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3311549252274847228.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3311549252274847228.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-28 06:18:45] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-28 06:18:45] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-28 06:18:45] [INFO ] Removed a total of 48 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:18:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-28 06:18:45] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 50 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-28 06:18:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14623501560085753460.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:18:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9209869784853300035.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14623501560085753460.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9209869784853300035.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.11657e+11,16.2295,231072,1095,31,281199,142,186,1.20697e+06,32,663,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((!(A(AX(EX((((i1.u5.p13==1)&&(i1.u8.p21==1))&&(i0.i1.u9.p25==1)))) U A((i6.u26.p71!=1) U !((((i7.u22.p61==1)&&(i7.u24.p67==1))&&(i6.u2...235
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([(FwdU((FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(!((E(!(!((((i7.u22.p61==1)&&(i7.u24.p67==1))&&(i6.u27.p77==1)))) U (!((i6.u26....1288
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t7, t14, t42, t53, t73, i0.i1.t63, i0.i1.t72, i0.i1.u6.t1, i0.i1.u6.t2, i0.i1.u9.t5, i0.i...492
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 75/75 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 78 /78 variables (removed 0) and now considering 75/75 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:19:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 06:19:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 06:19:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 06:19:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 81 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 146 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 74 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:19:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 28/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 3/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 75/153 variables, 78/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 1/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 2/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 2/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/153 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 153/153 variables, and 192 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved in 2130 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 28/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 8/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 75/153 variables, 78/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 74/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:19:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 1/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/153 variables, 0/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 153/153 variables, and 267 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved in 3939 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 6081ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6082ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6231 ms. Remains : 78/78 places, 75/75 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:19:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-28 06:19:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 06:19:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 75 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:19:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-28 06:19:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 06:19:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4101004999613697270.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:19:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12081276644532212399.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4101004999613697270.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12081276644532212399.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.11657e+11,3.03239,94888,2,7090,5,288417,6,0,389,657344,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(A(AF(AG(((p26==1)||((p56==1)&&(p66==1))))) U ((p76==1) * (A((((p63==1)&&(p71==1))&&(p75==1)) U A(((p37==1)&&(p70==1)) U (((p13==1)&&(p...256
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(EY(Init),!(((p76==1) * (!((E(!(!((E(!((((p13==1)&&(p23==1))&&(p25==1))) U (!(((p37==1)&&(p70==1))) * !...2749
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...380
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-28 06:19:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-28 06:19:51] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-28 06:19:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2198217203067543301.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2198217203067543301.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2198217203067543301.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2198217203067543301.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2198217203067543301.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-28 06:19:51] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-28 06:19:51] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-28 06:19:51] [INFO ] Removed a total of 48 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:19:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-28 06:19:51] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 50 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-28 06:19:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14922830316078034032.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:19:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11512281035992260319.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14922830316078034032.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11512281035992260319.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.11657e+11,16.637,218620,1057,30,281255,215,186,1.0152e+06,32,1590,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(A(AF(AG(((i0.i1.u9.p26==1)||((i5.u20.p56==1)&&(i5.u24.p66==1))))) U ((i7.u27.p76==1) * (A((((i7.u23.p63==1)&&(i7.u26.p71==1))&&(i7.u27...384
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(EY(Init),!(((i7.u27.p76==1) * (!((E(!(!((E(!((((i1.u5.p13==1)&&(i1.u8.p23==1))&&(i0.i1.u9.p25==1))) U ...3999
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t7, t14, t40, t55, t73, i0.i1.t63, i0.i1.t72, i0.i1.u6.t1, i0.i1.u6.t2, i0.i1.u9.t5, i0.i...492
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 75/75 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 78 /78 variables (removed 0) and now considering 75/75 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:20:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 06:20:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 06:20:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 06:20:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 65 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 123 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-28 06:20:21] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 21 ms returned []
Running 74 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:20:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 28/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:20:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:20:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:20:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 3/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 75/153 variables, 78/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:20:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 1/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:20:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:20:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 2/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:20:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:20:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 2/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/153 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 153/153 variables, and 192 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved in 2143 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 28/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 8/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 75/153 variables, 78/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 74/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 1/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/153 variables, 0/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 153/153 variables, and 267 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved in 3963 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 6119ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6120ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6276 ms. Remains : 78/78 places, 75/75 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:20:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-28 06:20:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 06:20:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 75 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:20:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 06:20:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 06:20:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14368203521635138663.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:20:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1097559625681155293.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14368203521635138663.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1097559625681155293.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.11657e+11,3.65146,96260,2,7090,5,288417,6,0,389,657344,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!((!((AG(A((p22==1) U (p75==1))) + !(AG((p76==1))))) * AF((((p33==1)&&(p48==1))||((p12==1)&&(p45==1)))))) U (EG(((((!(((p38==1)&&(p48==...912
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((EG(((((!(((p38==1)&&(p48==1))&&(p50==1)))||(((p13==1)&&(p21==1))&&((p27==1)&&(p64==1))))||((!(...4289
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...380
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-28 06:20:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-28 06:20:58] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-28 06:20:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2259161203568012525.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2259161203568012525.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2259161203568012525.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2259161203568012525.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2259161203568012525.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-28 06:20:58] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-28 06:20:58] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-28 06:20:58] [INFO ] Removed a total of 48 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:20:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 06:20:58] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 50 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-28 06:20:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8726006048624736123.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:20:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12063176603256294090.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8726006048624736123.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12063176603256294090.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.11657e+11,10.5245,250756,1191,31,368705,142,187,1.42728e+06,32,653,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!((!((AG(A((i1.u8.p22==1) U (i6.u27.p75==1))) + !(AG((i6.u27.p76==1))))) * AF((((i2.u12.p33==1)&&(i2.u17.p48==1))||((i1.u5.p12==1)&&(i2...1423
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((EG(((((!(((i2.u14.p38==1)&&(i2.u17.p48==1))&&(i2.u18.p50==1)))||(((i1.u5.p13==1)&&(i1.u8.p21==...6498
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t7, t14, t42, t55, t73, i0.i1.t63, i0.i1.t72, i0.i1.u6.t1, i0.i1.u6.t2, i0.i1.u9.t5, i0.i...492
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 75/75 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 78 /78 variables (removed 0) and now considering 75/75 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:21:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 06:21:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 06:21:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 06:21:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 64 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 138 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 74 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:21:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 28/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 3/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 75/153 variables, 78/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 1/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 2/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 2/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/153 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 153/153 variables, and 192 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved in 2116 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 28/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 8/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 75/153 variables, 78/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 74/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 1/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/153 variables, 0/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 153/153 variables, and 267 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved in 3819 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 5948ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5949ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6100 ms. Remains : 78/78 places, 75/75 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:21:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 06:21:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 06:21:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 75 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:21:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 06:21:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 06:21:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability943981991019750025.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:21:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13630336836106463451.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability943981991019750025.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13630336836106463451.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.11657e+11,3.10035,94656,2,7090,5,288417,6,0,389,657344,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EX(A(((AF((p62==1)) + ((((p63==1)&&(p71==1))&&((p77==1)&&(p38==1)))&&((p48==1)&&(p52==1)))) + (((EF((p51==1)) * (p39==1)) * ((p60==1)&&...300
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,EX(!((E(!(!(((((p58==1)&&(p73==1))||((p5==1)&&(p18==1)))||(!(((p38==1)&&(p46==1))&&(p50==1)))))) U (...575
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...380
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-28 06:22:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-28 06:22:04] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-28 06:22:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12185423975895080847.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12185423975895080847.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12185423975895080847.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12185423975895080847.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12185423975895080847.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-28 06:22:04] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-28 06:22:04] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-28 06:22:04] [INFO ] Removed a total of 48 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:22:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2024-05-28 06:22:04] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 48 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-28 06:22:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16626403490616389260.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:22:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6121730561567130414.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16626403490616389260.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6121730561567130414.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.11657e+11,13.9659,201368,1000,31,215456,222,166,1.03893e+06,32,1661,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EX(A(((AF((i8.u23.p62==1)) + ((((i8.u23.p63==1)&&(i8.u26.p71==1))&&((i8.u27.p77==1)&&(i3.u14.p38==1)))&&((i3.u17.p48==1)&&(i3.u18.p52==...445
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,EX(!((E(!(!(((((i8.u21.p58==1)&&(i8.u26.p73==1))||((i0.u2.p5==1)&&(i1.u7.p18==1)))||(!(((i3.u14.p38=...814
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t7, t14, t40, t55, t72, i0.t63, i0.u6.t1, i0.u6.t2, i2.t73, i2.t60, i2.u8.t3, i2.u8.t4, i...474
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 75/75 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 78 /78 variables (removed 0) and now considering 75/75 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:22:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 06:22:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 06:22:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 06:22:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 75 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 176 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 74 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:22:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 28/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:22:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:22:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:22:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 3/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 75/153 variables, 78/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:22:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 1/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:22:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:22:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 2/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:22:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:22:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 2/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/153 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 153/153 variables, and 192 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved in 2143 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 28/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 8/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 75/153 variables, 78/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 74/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:22:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 1/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/153 variables, 0/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 153/153 variables, and 267 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved in 3878 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 6042ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6043ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6223 ms. Remains : 78/78 places, 75/75 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:22:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 06:22:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 06:22:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 75 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:22:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 06:22:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-28 06:22:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3796535769604839858.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-28 06:22:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16072298132061933330.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3796535769604839858.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16072298132061933330.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.11657e+11,3.01377,95956,2,7090,5,288417,6,0,389,657344,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((AF(EG((p50!=1))) + (EX(A(((((p11==1)&&(p15==1))&&(p27==1))||(p41==1)) U !(((p53==1)&&(p74==1))))) * AG((p41==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!(EG(!(EG((p50!=1))))) + (EX(!((E(!(!(((p53==1)&&(p74==1)))) U (!(((((p11==1)&&(p15==1))&&(p27==1))|...273
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...380
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-28 06:23:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-28 06:23:10] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-28 06:23:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3499508052176558972.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3499508052176558972.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3499508052176558972.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3499508052176558972.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3499508052176558972.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-28 06:23:10] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-28 06:23:10] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-28 06:23:10] [INFO ] Removed a total of 48 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:23:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-28 06:23:10] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 50 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-28 06:23:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15505204668961447446.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:23:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15141207832116750788.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15505204668961447446.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15141207832116750788.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.11657e+11,9.95837,192656,1315,31,232919,98,185,1.30966e+06,32,456,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((AF(EG((i4.u18.p50!=1))) + (EX(A(((((i1.i0.u4.p11==1)&&(i1.i0.u6.p15==1))&&(i1.i0.u9.p27==1))||(i4.u15.p41==1)) U !(((i7.u19.p53==1)&&...199
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!(EG(!(EG((i4.u18.p50!=1))))) + (EX(!((E(!(!(((i7.u19.p53==1)&&(i6.u27.p74==1)))) U (!(((((i1.i0.u4....363
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t7, t14, t44, t53, t74, i0.t60, i0.u8.t3, i0.u8.t4, i1.i0.t63, i1.i0.t72, i1.i0.u6.t1, i1...492
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 75/75 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 77 transition count 73
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 75 transition count 73
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 74 transition count 72
Applied a total of 5 rules in 9 ms. Remains 74 /78 variables (removed 4) and now considering 72/75 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 74 cols
[2024-05-28 06:23:40] [INFO ] Computed 27 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-28 06:23:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 06:23:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 06:23:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 68 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 150 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-28 06:23:41] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 15 ms returned [64]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 70 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 71 rows 74 cols
[2024-05-28 06:23:41] [INFO ] Computed 27 invariants in 1 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 74/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 27/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 3/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 71/145 variables, 74/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 3/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:23:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:23:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:23:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 3/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:23:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:23:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 2/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/145 variables, 0/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 145/145 variables, and 186 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved in 2015 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 74/74 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 74/74 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 70/70 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 74/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 27/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 11/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 71/145 variables, 74/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 70/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:23:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:23:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 2/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:23:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 1/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/145 variables, 0/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 145/145 variables, and 259 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved in 2069 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 74/74 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 74/74 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 70/70 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints]
After SMT, in 4124ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4141ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 74/78 places, 71/75 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 74 /74 variables (removed 0) and now considering 71/71 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 4338 ms. Remains : 74/78 places, 71/75 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:23:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-28 06:23:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 06:23:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 71 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:23:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 06:23:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 06:23:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9440056057124877596.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:23:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability988700806226852257.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9440056057124877596.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability988700806226852257.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.85913e+10,1.62053,55816,2,3916,5,184078,6,0,370,382089,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((EF(!(A(((((p13==1)&&(p21==1))&&((p25==1)&&(p33==1)))&&(p47==1)) U AF((p46==1))))) * (p25==0)) * (((p61==0)||(p65==0))||(p76==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((E(TRUE U !(!((E(!(!(EG(!((p46==1))))) U (!(((((p13==1)&&(p21==1))&&((p25==1)&&(p33==1)))&&(p47==1))...273
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t25, t32...370
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-28 06:24:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 06:24:15] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-28 06:24:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17997021890456291339.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17997021890456291339.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17997021890456291339.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17997021890456291339.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17997021890456291339.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-28 06:24:15] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-28 06:24:15] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-28 06:24:15] [INFO ] Removed a total of 43 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:24:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 06:24:15] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 50 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-28 06:24:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6784771863104667946.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:24:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7170988404426333619.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6784771863104667946.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7170988404426333619.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.85913e+10,4.51048,108932,1002,29,149153,71,174,574525,33,320,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((EF(!(A(((((i2.u5.p13==1)&&(i2.u8.p21==1))&&((i1.u9.p25==1)&&(i4.u12.p33==1)))&&(i4.u17.p47==1)) U AF((i4.u17.p46==1))))) * (i1.u9.p2...222
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((E(TRUE U !(!((E(!(!(EG(!((i4.u17.p46==1))))) U (!(((((i2.u5.p13==1)&&(i2.u8.p21==1))&&((i1.u9.p25==...356
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t14, t44, t49, t50, t62, t69, i0.i1.t0, i1.t58, i1.u6.t1, i1.u6.t2, i1.u9.t5, i1.u9.t6, i...491
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 75/75 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 77 transition count 73
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 75 transition count 73
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 74 transition count 72
Applied a total of 5 rules in 5 ms. Remains 74 /78 variables (removed 4) and now considering 72/75 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 74 cols
[2024-05-28 06:24:45] [INFO ] Computed 27 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-28 06:24:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 06:24:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 06:24:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 82 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 159 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-28 06:24:45] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 16 ms returned [64]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 70 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 71 rows 74 cols
[2024-05-28 06:24:45] [INFO ] Computed 27 invariants in 1 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 74/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 27/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:24:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 51 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:24:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:24:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 3/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 71/145 variables, 74/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:24:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:24:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:24:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 3/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:24:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:24:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:24:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 3/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:24:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:24:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 2/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/145 variables, 0/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 145/145 variables, and 186 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved in 2130 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 74/74 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 74/74 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 70/70 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 74/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 27/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 11/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 71/145 variables, 74/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 70/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:24:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:24:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 2/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:24:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 1/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/145 variables, 0/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 145/145 variables, and 259 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved in 2079 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 74/74 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 74/74 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 70/70 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints]
After SMT, in 4245ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4245ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 74/78 places, 71/75 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 74 /74 variables (removed 0) and now considering 71/71 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 4446 ms. Remains : 74/78 places, 71/75 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:24:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 06:24:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 06:24:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 71 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:24:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 06:24:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 06:24:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10100898757087059484.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:24:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11546790604393510427.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10100898757087059484.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11546790604393510427.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.85913e+10,1.59961,55792,2,3916,5,184078,6,0,370,382089,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG((p66==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !((p66==0))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t25, t32...370
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-28 06:25:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-28 06:25:19] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-28 06:25:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11443702321064828323.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11443702321064828323.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11443702321064828323.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11443702321064828323.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11443702321064828323.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-28 06:25:20] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-28 06:25:20] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-28 06:25:20] [INFO ] Removed a total of 43 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:25:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 06:25:20] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 46 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-28 06:25:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7393765280281068318.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:25:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5247072297387220862.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7393765280281068318.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5247072297387220862.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.85913e+10,9.21577,144828,1061,29,151699,71,157,785274,33,326,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG((i6.u23.p66==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !((i6.u23.p66==0))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t7, t14, t42, t60, t69, i0.t50, i0.u6.t1, i0.u6.t2, i2.t62, i2.t49, i2.u8.t3, i2.u8.t4, i...491
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 75/75 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 78 /78 variables (removed 0) and now considering 75/75 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 75 rows 78 cols
[2024-05-28 06:25:50] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-28 06:25:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 06:25:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 06:25:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 69 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 131 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 74 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:25:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 28/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:25:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:25:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:25:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 3/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 75/153 variables, 78/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 1/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 2/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 2/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/153 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 153/153 variables, and 192 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved in 2218 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 77/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/78 variables, 28/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 8/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 75/153 variables, 78/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 74/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 1/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/153 variables, 0/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 153/153 variables, and 267 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved in 4069 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 6332ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6333ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6466 ms. Remains : 78/78 places, 75/75 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:25:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 06:25:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 06:25:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 75 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:25:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 06:25:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2024-05-28 06:25:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1842722583468694224.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:25:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14634408919922379771.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1842722583468694224.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14634408919922379771.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.11657e+11,3.06492,96284,2,7090,5,288417,6,0,389,657344,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((EG((AX(((p58==0)||(p72==0))) + EG((p64==0)))) * ((p37==0)||(p70==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((EG((!(EX(!(((p58==0)||(p72==0))))) + EG((p64==0)))) * ((p37==0)||(p70==0)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...380
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-28 06:26:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-28 06:26:26] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-28 06:26:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7887169273288512888.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7887169273288512888.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7887169273288512888.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7887169273288512888.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7887169273288512888.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-28 06:26:26] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-28 06:26:26] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-28 06:26:26] [INFO ] Removed a total of 48 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:26:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 06:26:26] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 48 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-28 06:26:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14147112815436295124.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:26:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14594938014456052043.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14147112815436295124.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14594938014456052043.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.11657e+11,10.7807,195768,936,30,251823,145,164,965003,32,658,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((EG((AX(((i7.u21.p58==0)||(i7.u26.p72==0))) + EG((i8.u24.p64==0)))) * ((i4.u14.p37==0)||(i7.u26.p70==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((EG((!(EX(!(((i7.u21.p58==0)||(i7.u26.p72==0))))) + EG((i8.u24.p64==0)))) * ((i4.u14.p37==0)||(i7.u...178
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t7, t14, t40, t54, t72, i0.t63, i0.u6.t1, i0.u6.t2, i2.t73, i2.t60, i2.u8.t3, i2.u8.t4, i...474
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-28 06:26:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-28 06:26:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 06:26:56] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-28 06:26:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11962264551245292853.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11962264551245292853.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11962264551245292853.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11962264551245292853.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11962264551245292853.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-28 06:26:56] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-28 06:26:56] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-28 06:26:56] [INFO ] Removed a total of 48 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:26:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-05-28 06:26:56] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 54 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-28 06:26:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9689317222590854556.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:26:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16856541770008337151.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9689317222590854556.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16856541770008337151.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 12 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.11657e+11,10.6876,256444,1093,31,377111,141,198,1.36127e+06,32,635,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(E(EG(!((AF(((i4.u11.p32==1)&&(i3.u12.p34==1))) * !(((i6.u19.p53==1)&&(i7.u27.p74==1)))))) U AF((((i3.u14.p38==1)&&(i3.u17.p48==1))&&(i...172
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(EG(!((!(EG(!(((i4.u11.p32==1)&&(i3.u12.p34==1))))) * !(((i6.u19.p53==1)&&(i7.u27.p74==1)))))) U...231
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t7, t14, t40, t55, t71, i1.t63, i1.u6.t1, i1.u6.t2, i2.t74, i2.i0.t60, i2.i0.u8.t3, i2.i0...489
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 137
[2024-05-28 06:44:02] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-28 06:44:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 06:44:02] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-28 06:44:02] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-28 06:44:02] [INFO ] Removed a total of 51 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:44:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-28 06:44:02] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 36 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-28 06:44:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12331769431723313461.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:44:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8873484141373721717.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12331769431723313461.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8873484141373721717.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 12 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.11657e+11,1.81177,64400,1116,27,119564,142,173,251020,30,307,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(E(EG(!((AF(((i10.u14.p32==1)&&(i10.u15.p34==1))) * !(((u22.p53==1)&&(u31.p74==1)))))) U AF((((u17.p38==1)&&(u20.p48==1))&&(u21.p50==1)...159
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(EG(!((!(EG(!(((i10.u14.p32==1)&&(i10.u15.p34==1))))) * !(((u22.p53==1)&&(u31.p74==1)))))) U !(E...218
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t31, t33, t39, t44, t45, t48, t52, t55, t61, t63, t67, t70, u8.t1, u8.t2, u10.t3, u10.t4, u11...405
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2024-05-28 06:50:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-28 06:50:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 75 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:50:40] [INFO ] Transformed 78 places.
[2024-05-28 06:50:40] [INFO ] Transformed 75 transitions.
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/pinvar' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/RGMEDD2' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn' '-META' '-varord-only'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Using order generated by GreatSPN with heuristic : META
[2024-05-28 06:50:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10236042846979918065.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 06:50:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6536403906580428710.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10236042846979918065.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6536403906580428710.ctl' '--load-order' '/home/mcc/execution/model.ord' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...329
Successfully loaded order from file /home/mcc/execution/model.ord
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 12 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.11657e+11,7.79983,203848,2,6163,5,545607,6,0,389,1.60835e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(E(EG(!((AF(((p32==1)&&(p34==1))) * !(((p53==1)&&(p74==1)))))) U AF((((p38==1)&&(p48==1))&&(p50==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(EG(!((!(EG(!(((p32==1)&&(p34==1))))) * !(((p53==1)&&(p74==1)))))) U !(EG(!((((p38==1)&&(p48==1)...182
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...380
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 137
Total runtime 2972278 ms.

BK_STOP 1716879728735

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldIIPs-PT-003A"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldIIPs-PT-003A, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r356-tall-171683760200034"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldIIPs-PT-003A.tgz
mv ShieldIIPs-PT-003A execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;