Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r356-tall-171683760100001.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldIIPs-PT-001A, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r356-tall-171683760100001
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 524K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 71K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.9K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 44K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.2K Apr 23 07:51 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 22K Apr 23 07:51 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K Apr 23 07:51 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Apr 23 07:51 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K Apr 11 14:26 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 166K Apr 11 14:26 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Apr 11 14:25 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 96K Apr 11 14:25 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Apr 23 07:51 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 23 07:51 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.0K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-001A-CTLCardinality-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-001A-CTLCardinality-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-001A-CTLCardinality-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-001A-CTLCardinality-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-001A-CTLCardinality-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-001A-CTLCardinality-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-001A-CTLCardinality-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-001A-CTLCardinality-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-001A-CTLCardinality-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-001A-CTLCardinality-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-001A-CTLCardinality-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-001A-CTLCardinality-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-001A-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-001A-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-001A-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-001A-CTLCardinality-2023-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716876366224

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldIIPs-PT-001A
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-28 06:06:07] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-28 06:06:07] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-28 06:06:07] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 36 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:07] [INFO ] Transformed 28 places.
[2024-05-28 06:06:07] [INFO ] Transformed 27 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:06:07] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-28 06:06:07] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 28 places and 27 transitions and 114 arcs in 144 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 31 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-001A-CTLCardinality-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-001A-CTLCardinality-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 28 out of 28 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 28/28 places, 27/27 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 28 /28 variables (removed 0) and now considering 27/27 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 27 rows 28 cols
[2024-05-28 06:06:07] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 5 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 150 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 06:06:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 06:06:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 74 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 261 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 26 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:06:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/28 variables, 10/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:06:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 27/55 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/55 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 55/55 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved in 634 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 28/28 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/28 variables, 10/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 27/55 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 26/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/55 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 55/55 variables, and 93 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved in 446 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 28/28 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 1128ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1140ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1439 ms. Remains : 28/28 places, 27/27 transitions.
Support contains 28 out of 28 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-28 06:06:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:09] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-001A-CTLCardinality-2024-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-28 06:06:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 27 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 43 to 40
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (122 resets) in 772 ms. (51 steps per ms) remains 1/40 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (8 resets) in 216 ms. (184 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2024-05-28 06:06:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp16 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 10/55 variables, and 8 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 27 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 4/28 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/10 constraints, State Equation: 0/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 34ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 13 simplifications.
[2024-05-28 06:06:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 27 transitions.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 28/28 places, 27/27 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 28 /28 variables (removed 0) and now considering 27/27 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:06:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 06:06:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 06:06:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 06:06:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 54 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 128 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 26 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:06:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/28 variables, 10/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:06:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 27/55 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/55 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 55/55 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved in 333 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 28/28 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/28 variables, 10/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 27/55 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 26/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/55 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 55/55 variables, and 93 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved in 324 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 28/28 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 678ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 680ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 811 ms. Remains : 28/28 places, 27/27 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:06:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 27 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:06:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10459753333193693207.gal : 8 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7629405027872952717.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10459753333193693207.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7629405027872952717.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9143,0.047776,4852,2,387,5,6350,6,0,141,10584,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EX(EX(EX(((p2==0)&&(p16==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(EX(EX(((p2==0)&&(p16==1)))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t9, t12, t19, t20, t23, t24, t26, Intersection with reachable at...222
(forward)formula 0,0,0.276661,13552,1,0,292,51621,76,174,1005,82274,214
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-001A-CTLCardinality-2024-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 28/28 places, 27/27 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 28 transition count 26
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 27 transition count 26
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 26 transition count 25
Applied a total of 4 rules in 21 ms. Remains 26 /28 variables (removed 2) and now considering 25/27 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 25 rows 26 cols
[2024-05-28 06:06:11] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned [12]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 34 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 25/28 places, 25/27 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 25 /25 variables (removed 0) and now considering 25/25 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 57 ms. Remains : 25/28 places, 25/27 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:06:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 25 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:06:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14656589645384658591.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16673729017838043979.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14656589645384658591.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16673729017838043979.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3391,0.028346,4632,2,372,5,5135,6,0,127,8268,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AG(((p2==0)&&(p27==1))) * AF(((p6==0)&&(p26==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(((p2==0)&&(p27==1)))))) * !(EG(!(((p6==0)&&(p26==1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t8, t15, t16, t17, t19, t20, t21, t24, Intersection with reachable at ea...219
(forward)formula 0,0,0.31772,16540,1,0,269,70724,80,130,921,102643,273
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-001A-CTLCardinality-2024-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 28/28 places, 27/27 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 28 /28 variables (removed 0) and now considering 27/27 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 27 rows 28 cols
[2024-05-28 06:06:11] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 06:06:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 06:06:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 53 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 96 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 26 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:06:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/28 variables, 10/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 27/55 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/55 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 55/55 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved in 291 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 28/28 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/28 variables, 10/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 27/55 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 26/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/55 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 55/55 variables, and 93 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved in 315 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 28/28 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 618ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 618ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 715 ms. Remains : 28/28 places, 27/27 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:06:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 27 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:06:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4531552510377100113.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1926408264157801563.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4531552510377100113.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1926408264157801563.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9143,0.032138,4920,2,387,5,6350,6,0,141,10584,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(AX(AG((p6==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !((p6==0))))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t9, t12, t19, t20, t23, t24, t26, Intersection with reachable at...222
(forward)formula 0,1,0.270451,13632,1,0,150,53651,76,68,1015,66886,155
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-001A-CTLCardinality-2024-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 28/28 places, 27/27 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 28 /28 variables (removed 0) and now considering 27/27 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:06:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 06:06:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 06:06:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 06:06:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 41 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 70 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 26 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:06:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/28 variables, 10/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:06:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 27/55 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/55 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 55/55 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved in 277 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 28/28 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/28 variables, 10/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 27/55 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 26/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/55 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 55/55 variables, and 93 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved in 256 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 28/28 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 541ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 541ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 612 ms. Remains : 28/28 places, 27/27 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:06:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 27 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:06:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10633172829052697349.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8797324026772648130.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10633172829052697349.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8797324026772648130.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9143,0.031418,4924,2,387,5,6350,6,0,141,10584,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(E(EF((!(AF(((p3==0)||(p27==1)))) * !(AF((p0==1))))) U ((p9==0)&&(p21==1)))) + AG(((AX(((p25==0)||(p15==1))) * EG((p27==1))) * ((p3==0)...169
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY(FwdU((Init * !(!(E(E(TRUE U (!(!(EG(!(((p3==0)||(p27==1)))))) * !(!(EG(!((p0==1))))))) U ((p9==0)&&(p21==...516
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t9, t12, t19, t20, t23, t24, t26, Intersection with reachable at...222
(forward)formula 0,1,0.751773,29800,1,0,568,140424,99,266,1019,212069,665
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-001A-CTLCardinality-2024-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 28/28 places, 27/27 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 28 transition count 26
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 27 transition count 26
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 26 transition count 25
Applied a total of 4 rules in 3 ms. Remains 26 /28 variables (removed 2) and now considering 25/27 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 25 rows 26 cols
[2024-05-28 06:06:13] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned [12]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 31 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 25/28 places, 25/27 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 25 /25 variables (removed 0) and now considering 25/25 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 35 ms. Remains : 25/28 places, 25/27 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:06:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 25 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:06:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12585381395767407153.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12843867374796092052.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12585381395767407153.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12843867374796092052.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3391,0.026765,4628,2,372,5,5135,6,0,127,8268,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(E((p7==1) U !(AF(E(((p26==0)||(p21==1)) U (p27==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E((p7==1) U !(!(EG(!(E(((p26==0)||(p21==1)) U (p27==0)))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t8, t15, t16, t17, t19, t20, t21, t24, Intersection with reachable at ea...219
(forward)formula 0,0,0.074492,6476,1,0,95,13693,83,42,922,18521,87
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-001A-CTLCardinality-2024-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 28/28 places, 27/27 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 28 transition count 26
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 27 transition count 26
Applied a total of 2 rules in 3 ms. Remains 27 /28 variables (removed 1) and now considering 26/27 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 26 rows 27 cols
[2024-05-28 06:06:14] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned [12]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 34 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 26/28 places, 26/27 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 26 /26 variables (removed 0) and now considering 26/26 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 39 ms. Remains : 26/28 places, 26/27 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:06:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 26 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:06:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14650325399229643637.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2271362785588655030.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14650325399229643637.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2271362785588655030.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4572,0.027821,4636,2,387,5,5330,6,0,132,8191,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((p26==0)||(p19==1)) U AG((((!((p3==0)||(p17==1)))||(!((p23==0)||(p9==1))))||((p8==0)||(p24==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,((p26==0)||(p19==1))) * !(E(TRUE U !((((!((p3==0)||(p17==1)))||(!((p23==0)||(p9==1))))||((p8==0)||(p...177
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t8, t11, t20, t21, t22, t23, t25, Intersection with reachable at...222
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 18/0/8
(forward)formula 0,1,0.16054,10180,1,0,94,31610,81,39,975,41693,88
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-001A-CTLCardinality-2024-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 28/28 places, 27/27 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 28 /28 variables (removed 0) and now considering 27/27 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 27 rows 28 cols
[2024-05-28 06:06:14] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 06:06:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 06:06:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 41 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 71 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 26 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:06:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/28 variables, 10/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 27/55 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/55 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 55/55 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved in 272 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 28/28 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/28 variables, 10/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 27/55 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 26/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/55 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 55/55 variables, and 93 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved in 255 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 28/28 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 539ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 540ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 611 ms. Remains : 28/28 places, 27/27 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:06:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 27 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:06:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12734703814872891338.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality280964949975802645.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12734703814872891338.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality280964949975802645.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9143,0.037086,4924,2,387,5,6350,6,0,141,10584,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG((((p23==0)||(p8==1))||((p21==1)&&(p26==1)))) + EX(EF(EG((((p22!=1)&&(p4!=0))&&(p26!=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,(((p23==0)||(p8==1))||((p21==1)&&(p26==1))))] != FALSE + [FwdG(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE),(((p22!=1)&&(p4!=...181
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 14/0/13
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 17/19/10
(forward)formula 0,1,0.112122,7828,1,0,15,20152,27,5,887,25148,20
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-001A-CTLCardinality-2024-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 28/28 places, 27/27 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 28 /28 variables (removed 0) and now considering 27/27 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:06:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 06:06:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 06:06:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 06:06:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 44 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 81 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 26 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:06:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/28 variables, 10/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:06:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 27/55 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/55 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 55/55 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved in 349 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 28/28 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/28 variables, 10/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 27/55 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 26/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/55 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 55/55 variables, and 93 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved in 293 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 28/28 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 669ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 671ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 754 ms. Remains : 28/28 places, 27/27 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:06:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 27 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:06:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality333879519851585106.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5231942890302523399.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality333879519851585106.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5231942890302523399.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9143,0.030915,4924,2,387,5,6350,6,0,141,10584,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EF(AX(FALSE)) U AG((AF(EX(TRUE)) + EX(EF(((p10==0)||(p2==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((!(EG(!(EX(TRUE)))) + EX(E(TRUE U ((p10==0)||(p2==1)))))))))))) * !(E(!(!(E(TRUE U...342
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t9, t12, t19, t20, t23, t24, t26, Intersection with reachable at...222
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,0.257177,13636,1,0,185,52586,84,88,1048,66712,200
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-001A-CTLCardinality-2024-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 28/28 places, 27/27 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 28 /28 variables (removed 0) and now considering 27/27 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:06:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 06:06:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 06:06:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 06:06:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 39 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 75 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 26 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:06:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/28 variables, 10/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:06:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 27/55 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/55 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 55/55 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved in 277 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 28/28 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/28 variables, 10/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 27/55 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 26/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/55 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 55/55 variables, and 93 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved in 282 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 28/28 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 565ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 565ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 642 ms. Remains : 28/28 places, 27/27 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:06:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 27 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:06:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14747178506198949012.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality874630614989108122.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14747178506198949012.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality874630614989108122.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9143,0.031581,4920,2,387,5,6350,6,0,141,10584,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(E(EF(((p24==1)&&(p3==1))) U !(EF(((p18==0)||(p4==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(EY(Init),E(TRUE U ((p24==1)&&(p3==1)))) * !(E(TRUE U ((p18==0)||(p4==1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t9, t12, t19, t20, t23, t24, t26, Intersection with reachable at...222
(forward)formula 0,0,0.072884,5976,1,0,87,13495,75,35,1008,13353,77
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-001A-CTLCardinality-2024-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 28/28 places, 27/27 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 27 transition count 25
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 25 transition count 25
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 24 transition count 24
Applied a total of 5 rules in 3 ms. Remains 24 /28 variables (removed 4) and now considering 24/27 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 24 rows 24 cols
[2024-05-28 06:06:16] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 26 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 06:06:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 06:06:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 30 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 69 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-28 06:06:16] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 12 ms returned [16]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 22 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 23 rows 24 cols
[2024-05-28 06:06:16] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 24/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 9/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:06:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 23/47 variables, 24/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/47 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 47/47 variables, and 58 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved in 212 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 24/24 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 24/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 9/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 23/47 variables, 24/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 22/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/47 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 47/47 variables, and 80 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved in 174 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 24/24 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 408ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 409ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 24/28 places, 23/27 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 24 /24 variables (removed 0) and now considering 23/23 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 500 ms. Remains : 24/28 places, 23/27 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:06:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 23 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:06:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11009956274154166683.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17840491768999959817.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11009956274154166683.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17840491768999959817.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3390,0.022605,4348,2,312,5,4788,6,0,122,7352,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG(((p9!=0)&&(p11!=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(((p9!=0)&&(p11!=1)))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t7, t14, t15, t17, t18, t19, t22, Intersection with reachable at each st...214
(forward)formula 0,0,0.06699,6196,1,0,75,12738,72,32,849,16087,67
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-001A-CTLCardinality-2024-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 28/28 places, 27/27 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 28 /28 variables (removed 0) and now considering 27/27 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 27 rows 28 cols
[2024-05-28 06:06:17] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 29 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 06:06:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 06:06:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 33 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 63 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 26 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:06:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/28 variables, 10/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 27/55 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/55 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 55/55 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved in 258 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 28/28 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/28 variables, 10/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 27/55 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 26/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/55 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 55/55 variables, and 93 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved in 264 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 28/28 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 548ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 549ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 614 ms. Remains : 28/28 places, 27/27 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:06:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 27 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:06:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality80771729819266488.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16873484112719663035.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality80771729819266488.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16873484112719663035.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9143,0.03433,4928,2,387,5,6350,6,0,141,10584,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AX((EF((EF(((p3==0)||(p6==1))) + (p14==1))) * !(E(((p25==0)||(p2==1)) U ((p26==0)||(p14==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(!((E(TRUE U (E(TRUE U ((p3==0)||(p6==1))) + (p14==1))) * !(E(((p25==0)||(p2==1)) U ((p26==0)||(p...179
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t9, t12, t19, t20, t23, t24, t26, Intersection with reachable at...222
(forward)formula 0,0,0.064795,5720,1,0,91,10930,81,37,1013,12876,78
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-001A-CTLCardinality-2024-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 28/28 places, 27/27 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 28 /28 variables (removed 0) and now considering 27/27 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:06:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 06:06:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 387 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 06:06:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 06:06:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 45 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 439 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 26 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:06:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/28 variables, 10/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:06:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 27/55 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/55 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 55/55 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved in 250 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 28/28 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/28 variables, 10/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 27/55 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 26/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/55 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 55/55 variables, and 93 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved in 262 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 28/28 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 549ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 550ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 991 ms. Remains : 28/28 places, 27/27 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:06:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 27 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:06:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5291701414835517234.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16245722405933209140.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5291701414835517234.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16245722405933209140.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9143,0.034366,4920,2,387,5,6350,6,0,141,10584,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX(EX((((AX(((p17==0)||(p21==1))) * E((((p7==1)||(p11==0))||(p15==1)) U (p17==1))) * ((p3==0)&&(p23==0))) * (p16==1)))) + E(AG(AX((((p5=...206
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((((EY(EY(Init)) * (p16==1)) * ((p3==0)&&(p23==0))) * !(EX(!(((p17==0)||(p21==1)))))),(((p7==1)||(p11==0)...297
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t9, t12, t19, t20, t23, t24, t26, Intersection with reachable at...222
(forward)formula 0,1,0.094482,7296,1,0,110,20521,91,47,1067,24725,100
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-001A-CTLCardinality-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 28/28 places, 27/27 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 28 /28 variables (removed 0) and now considering 27/27 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:06:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 06:06:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 06:06:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 06:06:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 31 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 72 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 26 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:06:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/28 variables, 10/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:06:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 27/55 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/55 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 55/55 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved in 263 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 28/28 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/28 variables, 10/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 27/55 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 26/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/55 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 55/55 variables, and 93 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved in 261 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 28/28 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 530ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 532ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 605 ms. Remains : 28/28 places, 27/27 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:06:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 27 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:06:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17398700350600085018.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13235397668644758035.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17398700350600085018.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13235397668644758035.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9143,0.036503,4920,2,387,5,6350,6,0,141,10584,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((AG((EX((p14==1)) + (AG(((p26==0)||(p17==1))) * (p10==0)))) * E(((A(((p8==0)||(p24==1)) U (p10==1)) + (p10==0)) + (p18==1)) U EX(EX(T...267
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (!(E(TRUE U !((EX((p14==1)) + (!(E(TRUE U !(((p26==0)||(p17==1))))) * (p10==0)))))) * E(...916
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t9, t12, t19, t20, t23, t24, t26, Intersection with reachable at...222
(forward)formula 0,1,0.766479,33312,1,0,768,166379,98,351,1049,228104,875
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-001A-CTLCardinality-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2024-05-28 06:06:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 06:06:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Total runtime 13225 ms.

BK_STOP 1716876380643

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldIIPs-PT-001A"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldIIPs-PT-001A, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r356-tall-171683760100001"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldIIPs-PT-001A.tgz
mv ShieldIIPs-PT-001A execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;