About the Execution of GreatSPN+red for ShieldPPPt-PT-004B
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
6606.119 | 972697.00 | 1641425.00 | 2725.40 | FFFFFFFF?TFTTFFF | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r355-tall-171683759100587.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool greatspnxred
Input is ShieldPPPt-PT-004B, examination is LTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r355-tall-171683759100587
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 488K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.6K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 54K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.2K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 60K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.3K Apr 23 07:54 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 23K Apr 23 07:54 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K May 19 07:32 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 19 19:12 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.1K Apr 11 14:37 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 82K Apr 11 14:37 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.1K Apr 11 14:36 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 81K Apr 11 14:36 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Apr 23 07:54 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 23 07:54 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 74K May 18 16:43 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-LTLCardinality-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-LTLCardinality-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-LTLCardinality-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-LTLCardinality-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-LTLCardinality-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-LTLCardinality-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-LTLCardinality-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-LTLCardinality-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-LTLCardinality-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-LTLCardinality-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-LTLCardinality-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-LTLCardinality-11
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-LTLCardinality-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-LTLCardinality-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-LTLCardinality-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-LTLCardinality-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1717006243067
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=greatspnxred
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldPPPt-PT-004B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Applying reductions before tool greatspn
Invoking reducer
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-29 18:10:44] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLCardinality, -timeout, 360, -rebuildPNML]
[2024-05-29 18:10:44] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-29 18:10:44] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 81 ms
[2024-05-29 18:10:44] [INFO ] Transformed 315 places.
[2024-05-29 18:10:44] [INFO ] Transformed 287 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:10:44] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-29 18:10:44] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 315 places and 287 transitions and 718 arcs in 185 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLCardinality.xml in 10 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 3 formulas.
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-LTLCardinality-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-LTLCardinality-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-LTLCardinality-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-LTLCardinality-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-LTLCardinality-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-LTLCardinality-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-LTLCardinality-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 26 out of 315 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 315/315 places, 287/287 transitions.
Discarding 41 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 41 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 274 transition count 246
Iterating global reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 274 transition count 246
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 83 place count 273 transition count 245
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 273 transition count 245
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 85 place count 272 transition count 244
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 272 transition count 244
Applied a total of 86 rules in 91 ms. Remains 272 /315 variables (removed 43) and now considering 244/287 (removed 43) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 244 rows 272 cols
[2024-05-29 18:10:44] [INFO ] Computed 45 invariants in 29 ms
[2024-05-29 18:10:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 307 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:10:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:10:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 256 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 593 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 243 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:10:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/272 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 91 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 77 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 20/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 13/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:10:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:10:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 2/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 244/516 variables, 272/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 0/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/516 variables, 1/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 0/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/516 variables, 0/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 516/516 variables, and 353 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved in 19271 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 272/272 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 243/243 constraints, Known Traps: 36/36 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/272 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 36/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 244/516 variables, 272/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 243/596 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 78 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 14/610 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:11:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 4/614 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 89 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 1/615 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 0/615 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:11:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 74 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/516 variables, 2/617 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 516/516 variables, and 617 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 272/272 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 243/243 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints]
After SMT, in 49375ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 49390ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 272/315 places, 244/287 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 50099 ms. Remains : 272/315 places, 244/287 transitions.
Support contains 26 out of 272 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-29 18:11:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 50 ms
[2024-05-29 18:11:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2024-05-29 18:11:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 244 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 7076 steps (0 resets) in 349 ms. (20 steps per ms) remains 0/15 properties
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-LTLCardinality-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
Computed a total of 63 stabilizing places and 63 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((X(G(p0))||G(p1)))'
Support contains 3 out of 272 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 272/272 places, 244/244 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 271 transition count 243
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 271 transition count 243
Applied a total of 2 rules in 10 ms. Remains 271 /272 variables (removed 1) and now considering 243/244 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 243 rows 271 cols
[2024-05-29 18:11:35] [INFO ] Computed 45 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:11:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 88 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:11:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:11:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 171 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 260 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 242 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:11:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/271 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:11:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 20/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:11:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 11/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 243/514 variables, 271/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 0/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/514 variables, 0/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 514/514 variables, and 347 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved in 12571 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 271/271 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 242/242 constraints, Known Traps: 31/31 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/271 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 31/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 1/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 243/514 variables, 271/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 242/590 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 85 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 70 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 67 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 15/605 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:11:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 2/607 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 77 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 4/611 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 0/611 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/514 variables, 0/611 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 514/514 variables, and 611 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 271/271 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 242/242 constraints, Known Traps: 53/53 constraints]
After SMT, in 42626ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 42629ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 271/272 places, 243/244 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 42900 ms. Remains : 271/272 places, 243/244 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 267 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-LTLCardinality-03
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 562 steps with 0 reset in 11 ms.
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-LTLCardinality-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-LTLCardinality-03 finished in 43239 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G((p0 U p1))))'
Support contains 4 out of 272 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 272/272 places, 244/244 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 52 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 52 transitions
Performed 52 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 52
Iterating post reduction 0 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 271 transition count 191
Reduce places removed 52 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 53 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 219 transition count 190
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 218 transition count 190
Performed 34 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 34 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 218 transition count 156
Deduced a syphon composed of 34 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 34 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 68 rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 184 transition count 156
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 177 place count 181 transition count 153
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 181 transition count 153
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 181 transition count 151
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 184 place count 179 transition count 151
Performed 61 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 61
Deduced a syphon composed of 61 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 61 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 122 rules applied. Total rules applied 306 place count 118 transition count 90
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 307 place count 118 transition count 89
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 309 place count 117 transition count 88
Performed 11 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 331 place count 106 transition count 88
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 333 place count 104 transition count 86
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 334 place count 103 transition count 86
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 334 place count 103 transition count 84
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 338 place count 101 transition count 84
Applied a total of 338 rules in 61 ms. Remains 101 /272 variables (removed 171) and now considering 84/244 (removed 160) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 101 cols
[2024-05-29 18:12:18] [INFO ] Computed 44 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:12:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 238 ms returned [83, 88]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 240 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 99/272 places, 84/244 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 97 transition count 82
Applied a total of 4 rules in 11 ms. Remains 97 /99 variables (removed 2) and now considering 82/84 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 82 rows 97 cols
[2024-05-29 18:12:18] [INFO ] Computed 42 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-29 18:12:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:12:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:12:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 7 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:12:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 102 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 162 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 97/272 places, 82/244 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 476 ms. Remains : 97/272 places, 82/244 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 169 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-LTLCardinality-05
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 261 reset in 461 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 145 steps with 0 reset with depth 146 and stack size 143 in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-LTLCardinality-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-LTLCardinality-05 finished in 1122 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 272 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 272/272 places, 244/244 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 53 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 53 transitions
Performed 53 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 53
Iterating post reduction 0 with 53 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 271 transition count 190
Reduce places removed 53 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 218 transition count 189
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 217 transition count 189
Performed 32 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 32 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 217 transition count 157
Deduced a syphon composed of 32 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 32 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 172 place count 185 transition count 157
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 175 place count 182 transition count 154
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 178 place count 182 transition count 154
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 178 place count 182 transition count 152
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 182 place count 180 transition count 152
Performed 65 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 65
Deduced a syphon composed of 65 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 65 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 130 rules applied. Total rules applied 312 place count 115 transition count 87
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 313 place count 115 transition count 86
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 315 place count 114 transition count 85
Performed 11 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 337 place count 103 transition count 85
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 339 place count 101 transition count 83
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 340 place count 100 transition count 83
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 340 place count 100 transition count 81
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 344 place count 98 transition count 81
Applied a total of 344 rules in 32 ms. Remains 98 /272 variables (removed 174) and now considering 81/244 (removed 163) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 98 cols
[2024-05-29 18:12:19] [INFO ] Computed 44 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:12:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 93 ms returned [81, 85]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 94 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 96/272 places, 81/244 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 95 transition count 80
Applied a total of 2 rules in 5 ms. Remains 95 /96 variables (removed 1) and now considering 80/81 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 95 cols
[2024-05-29 18:12:19] [INFO ] Computed 42 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:12:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:12:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:12:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 84 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 155 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 95/272 places, 80/244 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 286 ms. Remains : 95/272 places, 80/244 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 62 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-LTLCardinality-06
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1955 reset in 207 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 114 steps with 0 reset with depth 115 and stack size 115 in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-LTLCardinality-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-LTLCardinality-06 finished in 568 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G(F(p0))||G((p1||X(F(p2))))))'
Support contains 5 out of 272 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 272/272 places, 244/244 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 53 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 53 transitions
Performed 53 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 53
Iterating post reduction 0 with 53 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 271 transition count 190
Reduce places removed 53 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 218 transition count 189
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 217 transition count 189
Performed 32 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 32 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 217 transition count 157
Deduced a syphon composed of 32 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 32 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 172 place count 185 transition count 157
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 174 place count 183 transition count 155
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 176 place count 183 transition count 155
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 176 place count 183 transition count 154
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 178 place count 182 transition count 154
Performed 62 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 62
Deduced a syphon composed of 62 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 62 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 124 rules applied. Total rules applied 302 place count 120 transition count 92
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 303 place count 120 transition count 91
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 305 place count 119 transition count 90
Performed 11 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 327 place count 108 transition count 90
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 329 place count 106 transition count 88
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 330 place count 105 transition count 88
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 330 place count 105 transition count 86
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 334 place count 103 transition count 86
Applied a total of 334 rules in 32 ms. Remains 103 /272 variables (removed 169) and now considering 86/244 (removed 158) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 103 cols
[2024-05-29 18:12:20] [INFO ] Computed 44 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:12:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 109 ms returned [86, 90]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 110 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 101/272 places, 86/244 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 99 transition count 84
Applied a total of 4 rules in 3 ms. Remains 99 /101 variables (removed 2) and now considering 84/86 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 99 cols
[2024-05-29 18:12:20] [INFO ] Computed 42 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:12:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 77 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:12:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:12:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:12:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 90 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 168 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 99/272 places, 84/244 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 313 ms. Remains : 99/272 places, 84/244 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 123 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-LTLCardinality-08
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33467 reset in 205 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33256 reset in 197 ms.
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (X (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (X p0), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 13 factoid took 125 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 101 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1)]
RANDOM walk for 2442 steps (0 resets) in 57 ms. (42 steps per ms) remains 0/7 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (X (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (X p0), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT (OR p2 (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT (OR p2 p0 (NOT p1)))), (F p1), (F p2), (F (NOT (OR p2 p0))), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 13 factoid took 414 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 110 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 115 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1)]
Support contains 5 out of 99 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 84/84 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 99 /99 variables (removed 0) and now considering 84/84 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:12:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:12:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:12:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:12:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:12:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 82 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 144 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-29 18:12:22] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 79 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:12:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:12:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/99 variables, 10/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 1/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:12:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 1/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 84/183 variables, 99/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 2/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 0/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/183 variables, 0/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 183/183 variables, and 145 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 2150 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 42/42 constraints, State Equation: 99/99 constraints, ReadFeed: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 1/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/99 variables, 10/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 1/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 84/183 variables, 99/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 2/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 79/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 0/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/183 variables, 0/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 183/183 variables, and 224 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 1409 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 42/42 constraints, State Equation: 99/99 constraints, ReadFeed: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 3595ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3596ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3749 ms. Remains : 99/99 places, 84/84 transitions.
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (X (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (X p0), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) p1))), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 13 factoid took 118 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 128 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1)]
RANDOM walk for 3407 steps (0 resets) in 41 ms. (81 steps per ms) remains 0/7 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (X (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (X p0), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) p1))), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT (OR p2 (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT (OR p2 p0 (NOT p1)))), (F p1), (F p2), (F (NOT (OR p2 p0))), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 13 factoid took 405 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 131 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 118 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 116 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33458 reset in 137 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33185 reset in 148 ms.
Support contains 5 out of 99 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 84/84 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 99 /99 variables (removed 0) and now considering 84/84 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:12:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:12:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:12:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:12:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:12:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 77 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 141 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-29 18:12:27] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 79 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:12:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:12:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/99 variables, 10/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:12:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 1/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:12:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 1/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 84/183 variables, 99/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 2/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 0/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/183 variables, 0/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 183/183 variables, and 145 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 1923 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 42/42 constraints, State Equation: 99/99 constraints, ReadFeed: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 1/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/99 variables, 10/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 1/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 84/183 variables, 99/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 2/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 79/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 0/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/183 variables, 0/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 183/183 variables, and 224 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 1413 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 42/42 constraints, State Equation: 99/99 constraints, ReadFeed: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 3345ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3347ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3494 ms. Remains : 99/99 places, 84/84 transitions.
Treatment of property ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-LTLCardinality-08 finished in 10445 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(p0))'
Support contains 2 out of 272 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 272/272 places, 244/244 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 55 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 55 transitions
Performed 55 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 55
Iterating post reduction 0 with 55 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 271 transition count 188
Reduce places removed 55 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 55 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 216 transition count 188
Performed 32 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 32 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 216 transition count 156
Deduced a syphon composed of 32 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 32 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 184 transition count 156
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 177 place count 181 transition count 153
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 181 transition count 153
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 181 transition count 151
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 184 place count 179 transition count 151
Performed 61 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 61
Deduced a syphon composed of 61 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 61 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 122 rules applied. Total rules applied 306 place count 118 transition count 90
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 307 place count 118 transition count 89
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 309 place count 117 transition count 88
Performed 11 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 331 place count 106 transition count 88
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 333 place count 104 transition count 86
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 334 place count 103 transition count 86
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 334 place count 103 transition count 84
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 338 place count 101 transition count 84
Applied a total of 338 rules in 44 ms. Remains 101 /272 variables (removed 171) and now considering 84/244 (removed 160) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 101 cols
[2024-05-29 18:12:30] [INFO ] Computed 44 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-29 18:12:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 209 ms returned [84, 88]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 211 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 99/272 places, 84/244 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 4 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 97 transition count 82
Applied a total of 4 rules in 9 ms. Remains 97 /99 variables (removed 2) and now considering 82/84 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 82 rows 97 cols
[2024-05-29 18:12:30] [INFO ] Computed 42 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:12:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:12:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:12:31] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 16 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:12:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 101 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 171 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 97/272 places, 82/244 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 437 ms. Remains : 97/272 places, 82/244 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 27 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-LTLCardinality-10
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 6 reset in 194 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 43 steps with 4 reset with depth 27 and stack size 27 in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-LTLCardinality-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-LTLCardinality-10 finished in 679 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(X((X(F(p0))||G(p1))))))'
Support contains 3 out of 272 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 272/272 places, 244/244 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 270 transition count 242
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 270 transition count 242
Applied a total of 4 rules in 8 ms. Remains 270 /272 variables (removed 2) and now considering 242/244 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 242 rows 270 cols
[2024-05-29 18:12:31] [INFO ] Computed 45 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-29 18:12:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 91 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:12:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:12:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 153 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 245 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 241 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:12:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/270 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 89 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 20/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:12:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 11/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 242/512 variables, 270/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:12:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 2/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:12:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 2/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/512 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 512/512 variables, and 350 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved in 17217 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 270/270 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 241/241 constraints, Known Traps: 35/35 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/270 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 35/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 242/512 variables, 270/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 241/591 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:12:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 61 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 63 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 72 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 74 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 68 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 11/602 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:12:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 80 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:12:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 63 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 9/611 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:13:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 1/612 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 1/613 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 0/613 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 512/512 variables, and 613 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 270/270 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 241/241 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints]
After SMT, in 47245ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 47249ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 270/272 places, 242/244 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 47504 ms. Remains : 270/272 places, 242/244 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 193 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-LTLCardinality-11
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 20000 reset in 85 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 20000 reset in 132 ms.
Computed a total of 62 stabilizing places and 62 stable transitions
Computed a total of 62 stabilizing places and 62 stable transitions
Detected a total of 62/270 stabilizing places and 62/242 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 1/2 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (F (OR (G p1) (G (NOT p1))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 82 ms. Reduced automaton from 6 states, 8 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 6 states, 8 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 204 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 187 ms. (212 steps per ms) remains 1/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 117 ms. (339 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2024-05-29 18:13:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem apf2 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 154/512 variables, and 24 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 47 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 24/45 constraints, State Equation: 0/270 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 49ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Found 1 invariant AP formulas.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (F (OR (G p1) (G (NOT p1)))), (G (OR p0 (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p1), (F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 165 ms. Reduced automaton from 6 states, 8 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 5 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 192 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 206 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Support contains 2 out of 270 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 270/270 places, 242/242 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 270 /270 variables (removed 0) and now considering 242/242 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:13:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:13:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 91 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:13:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:13:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 150 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 242 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 241 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:13:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/270 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:13:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 67 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 20/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:13:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 11/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 242/512 variables, 270/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:13:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 2/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:13:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 2/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/512 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 512/512 variables, and 350 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved in 17463 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 270/270 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 241/241 constraints, Known Traps: 35/35 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/270 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 35/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 242/512 variables, 270/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 241/591 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:13:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 58 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 72 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 72 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 63 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 11/602 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 81 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 65 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 69 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 9/611 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 1/612 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:13:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 1/613 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 0/613 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 512/512 variables, and 613 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 270/270 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 241/241 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints]
After SMT, in 47495ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 47499ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 47750 ms. Remains : 270/270 places, 242/242 transitions.
Computed a total of 62 stabilizing places and 62 stable transitions
Computed a total of 62 stabilizing places and 62 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p0]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 71 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 5 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 5 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 164 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 1550 steps (0 resets) in 12 ms. (119 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [p0]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 87 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 5 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 5 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 189 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 183 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 191 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 20000 reset in 82 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 20000 reset in 91 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [true, false, false, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 170 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Support contains 2 out of 270 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 270/270 places, 242/242 transitions.
Performed 54 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Iterating post reduction 0 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 270 transition count 242
Performed 21 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 1 with 21 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 270 transition count 259
Deduced a syphon composed of 75 places in 1 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 270 transition count 259
Performed 76 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 151 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 76 rules applied. Total rules applied 151 place count 270 transition count 259
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 270 transition count 258
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 181 place count 241 transition count 229
Deduced a syphon composed of 122 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 210 place count 241 transition count 229
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 123 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 211 place count 241 transition count 229
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 213 place count 239 transition count 227
Deduced a syphon composed of 121 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 215 place count 239 transition count 227
Performed 15 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -62
Deduced a syphon composed of 136 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 230 place count 239 transition count 289
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 246 place count 223 transition count 257
Deduced a syphon composed of 120 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 262 place count 223 transition count 257
Deduced a syphon composed of 120 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 262 rules in 55 ms. Remains 223 /270 variables (removed 47) and now considering 257/242 (removed -15) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:14:09] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 10 ms returned []
Running 256 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 257 rows 223 cols
[2024-05-29 18:14:09] [INFO ] Computed 45 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:14:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 27 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/223 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD1 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD2 is UNSAT
[2024-05-29 18:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
[2024-05-29 18:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD4 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
[2024-05-29 18:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD6 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
[2024-05-29 18:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD8 is UNSAT
[2024-05-29 18:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD9 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD10 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD11 is UNSAT
[2024-05-29 18:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD12 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD13 is UNSAT
[2024-05-29 18:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD14 is UNSAT
[2024-05-29 18:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD15 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD16 is UNSAT
[2024-05-29 18:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD17 is UNSAT
[2024-05-29 18:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD18 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD19 is UNSAT
[2024-05-29 18:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD20 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD21 is UNSAT
[2024-05-29 18:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD22 is UNSAT
[2024-05-29 18:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD23 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD24 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD25 is UNSAT
[2024-05-29 18:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD26 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD27 is UNSAT
[2024-05-29 18:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD28 is UNSAT
[2024-05-29 18:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD29 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD30 is UNSAT
[2024-05-29 18:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD31 is UNSAT
[2024-05-29 18:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD32 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD33 is UNSAT
[2024-05-29 18:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD1 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD2 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD4 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD6 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD8 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD9 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD10 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD11 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD12 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD13 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD14 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD15 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD16 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD17 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD18 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD19 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD20 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD21 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD22 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD23 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD24 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD25 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD26 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD27 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD28 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD29 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD30 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD31 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD32 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD33 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD34 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD35 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD57 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD70 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD71 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD72 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD73 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD77 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD78 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD79 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD80 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD85 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD86 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD87 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD99 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD100 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD104 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD105 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD106 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD107 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD108 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD109 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD110 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD114 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD115 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD116 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD117 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD118 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD119 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD123 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD124 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD125 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD126 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD127 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD167 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD168 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD169 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD170 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD171 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD172 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD177 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD178 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD181 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD182 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD183 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD184 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD185 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD186 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD191 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD192 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD193 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD194 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD195 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD196 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD203 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD204 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD205 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD206 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD209 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD210 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD213 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD214 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD215 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD216 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD217 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD218 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD223 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD224 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD225 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD226 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD227 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD228 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD233 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD234 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD237 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD238 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD239 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD240 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD241 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD242 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD247 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD248 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD249 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD250 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD251 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD252 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 20/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 119 solved, 137 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD36 is UNSAT
[2024-05-29 18:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD37 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD38 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD39 is UNSAT
[2024-05-29 18:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD40 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD41 is UNSAT
[2024-05-29 18:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD42 is UNSAT
[2024-05-29 18:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD43 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD44 is UNSAT
[2024-05-29 18:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD45 is UNSAT
[2024-05-29 18:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD46 is UNSAT
[2024-05-29 18:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD48 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD49 is UNSAT
[2024-05-29 18:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD50 is UNSAT
[2024-05-29 18:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD51 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD52 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD53 is UNSAT
[2024-05-29 18:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD54 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD63 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD64 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD65 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD66 is UNSAT
[2024-05-29 18:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD83 is UNSAT
[2024-05-29 18:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD84 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD89 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD90 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD94 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD95 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD96 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD97 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD98 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD129 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD130 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD133 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD134 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD135 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD136 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD137 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD138 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD143 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD144 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD147 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD148 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD149 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD150 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD151 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD152 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD157 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD158 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD159 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD160 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD161 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD162 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 13/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 172 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 172 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 257/480 variables, 223/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 172 solved, 84 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 27/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 172 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 0/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 172 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/480 variables, 0/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 172 solved, 84 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 480/480 variables, and 328 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 172 solved, 84 unsolved in 5183 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 223/223 constraints, ReadFeed: 27/27 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 256/256 constraints, Known Traps: 33/33 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 172 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 172 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 121/223 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 172 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 33/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 172 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 172 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 257/480 variables, 223/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 172 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 27/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 172 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 84/412 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 172 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 0/412 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 172 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/480 variables, 0/412 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 172 solved, 84 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 480/480 variables, and 412 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 172 solved, 84 unsolved in 5323 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 223/223 constraints, ReadFeed: 27/27 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 84/256 constraints, Known Traps: 33/33 constraints]
After SMT, in 10551ms problems are : Problem set: 172 solved, 84 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 172 dead transitions in 10555ms
Found 172 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 172 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 172 transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 223/270 places, 85/242 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 290 edges and 223 vertex of which 103 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 120 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 120 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 10 ms. Remains 103 /223 variables (removed 120) and now considering 85/85 (removed 0) transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 103/270 places, 85/242 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 10648 ms. Remains : 103/270 places, 85/242 transitions.
Support contains 2 out of 270 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 270/270 places, 242/242 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 270 /270 variables (removed 0) and now considering 242/242 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 242 rows 270 cols
[2024-05-29 18:14:20] [INFO ] Computed 45 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:14:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 108 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:14:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:14:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 178 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 296 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 241 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:14:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/270 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:14:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 72 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 20/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 11/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 242/512 variables, 270/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:14:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 2/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:14:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 2/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/512 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 512/512 variables, and 350 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved in 17805 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 270/270 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 241/241 constraints, Known Traps: 35/35 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/270 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 35/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 242/512 variables, 270/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 241/591 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:14:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 63 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 70 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 69 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 11/602 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 75 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 67 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:14:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 9/611 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:14:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 1/612 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:14:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 1/613 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 0/613 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 512/512 variables, and 613 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 270/270 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 241/241 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints]
After SMT, in 47839ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 47841ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 48142 ms. Remains : 270/270 places, 242/242 transitions.
Treatment of property ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-LTLCardinality-11 finished in 156978 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 272 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 272/272 places, 244/244 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 55 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 55 transitions
Performed 55 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 55
Iterating post reduction 0 with 55 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 271 transition count 188
Reduce places removed 55 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 55 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 216 transition count 188
Performed 32 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 32 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 216 transition count 156
Deduced a syphon composed of 32 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 32 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 184 transition count 156
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 177 place count 181 transition count 153
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 181 transition count 153
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 181 transition count 151
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 184 place count 179 transition count 151
Performed 64 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 64
Deduced a syphon composed of 64 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 64 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 128 rules applied. Total rules applied 312 place count 115 transition count 87
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 313 place count 115 transition count 86
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 315 place count 114 transition count 85
Performed 11 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 337 place count 103 transition count 85
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 339 place count 101 transition count 83
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 340 place count 100 transition count 83
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 340 place count 100 transition count 81
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 344 place count 98 transition count 81
Applied a total of 344 rules in 31 ms. Remains 98 /272 variables (removed 174) and now considering 81/244 (removed 163) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 98 cols
[2024-05-29 18:15:08] [INFO ] Computed 44 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-29 18:15:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 117 ms returned [80, 85]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 118 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 96/272 places, 81/244 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 94 transition count 79
Applied a total of 4 rules in 3 ms. Remains 94 /96 variables (removed 2) and now considering 79/81 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 79 rows 94 cols
[2024-05-29 18:15:08] [INFO ] Computed 42 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:15:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 126 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:15:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:15:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 114 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 244 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 94/272 places, 79/244 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 397 ms. Remains : 94/272 places, 79/244 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 46 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-LTLCardinality-14
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 48930 steps with 0 reset in 98 ms.
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-LTLCardinality-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-LTLCardinality-14 finished in 557 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 272 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 272/272 places, 244/244 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 54 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 54 transitions
Performed 54 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 54
Iterating post reduction 0 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 271 transition count 189
Reduce places removed 54 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 217 transition count 189
Performed 33 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 33 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 217 transition count 156
Deduced a syphon composed of 33 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 33 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 66 rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 184 transition count 156
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 177 place count 181 transition count 153
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 181 transition count 153
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 181 transition count 151
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 184 place count 179 transition count 151
Performed 63 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 63
Deduced a syphon composed of 63 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 63 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 126 rules applied. Total rules applied 310 place count 116 transition count 88
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 311 place count 116 transition count 87
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 313 place count 115 transition count 86
Performed 11 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 335 place count 104 transition count 86
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 336 place count 103 transition count 85
Applied a total of 336 rules in 19 ms. Remains 103 /272 variables (removed 169) and now considering 85/244 (removed 159) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 103 cols
[2024-05-29 18:15:08] [INFO ] Computed 45 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-29 18:15:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned [96]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 72 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 102/272 places, 85/244 transitions.
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 102 transition count 83
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 100 transition count 83
Applied a total of 4 rules in 2 ms. Remains 100 /102 variables (removed 2) and now considering 83/85 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 83 rows 100 cols
[2024-05-29 18:15:09] [INFO ] Computed 44 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-29 18:15:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned [83, 87]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 80 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 98/272 places, 83/244 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 96 transition count 81
Applied a total of 4 rules in 3 ms. Remains 96 /98 variables (removed 2) and now considering 81/83 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 96 cols
[2024-05-29 18:15:09] [INFO ] Computed 42 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:15:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:15:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:15:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 5 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:15:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 100 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 171 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 3 : 96/272 places, 81/244 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 3 iterations and 348 ms. Remains : 96/272 places, 81/244 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 30 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-LTLCardinality-15
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 40341 steps with 0 reset in 98 ms.
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-LTLCardinality-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-LTLCardinality-15 finished in 491 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G(F(p0))||G((p1||X(F(p2))))))'
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(X((X(F(p0))||G(p1))))))'
[2024-05-29 18:15:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-05-29 18:15:09] [INFO ] Export to MCC of 2 properties in file /home/mcc/execution/LTLCardinality.sr.xml took 1 ms.
[2024-05-29 18:15:09] [INFO ] Export to PNML in file /home/mcc/execution/model.sr.pnml of net with 272 places, 244 transitions and 632 arcs took 6 ms.
Total runtime 265389 ms.
There are residual formulas that ITS could not solve within timeout
----------------------------------------------------------------------
GreatSPN-meddly tool, MCC 2023
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Running ShieldPPPt-PT-004B
IS_COLORED=
IS_NUPN=
LOADING PETRI NET FILE /home/mcc/execution/410/model.pnml (PNML) ...
PNML VERSION 2009, P/T NET.
COLOR CLASSES: 0
CONSTANTS: 0
PLACES: 272
TRANSITIONS: 244
COLOR VARS: 0
MEASURES: 0
LOADING TIME: [User 0.004s, Sys 0.000s]
SAVING FILE /home/mcc/execution/410/model (.net / .def) ...
EXPORT TIME: [User 0.000s, Sys 0.000s]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
GreatSPN/Meddly.
Copyright (C) 1987-2022, University of Torino, Italy.
website: https://github.com/greatspn/SOURCES
Based on MEDDLY version 0.16.0
Copyright (C) 2009, Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc.
website: http://meddly.sourceforge.net
Process ID: 2146
MODEL NAME: /home/mcc/execution/410/model
272 places, 244 transitions.
Creating all event NSFs..
Creating all event NSFs..
Creating all event NSFs..
Creating all event NSFs..
Split: SplitSubtract
Start RS construction.
Split: SplitSubtract
Start RS construction.
Split: SplitSubtract
Start RS construction.
Split: SplitSubtract
Start RS construction.
Building monolithic NSF...
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-LTLCardinality-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS PARALLEL_PROCESSING UNFOLDING_TO_PT USE_NUPN TOPOLOGICAL
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-LTLCardinality-08 CANNOT_COMPUTE
Ok.
EXITCODE: 0
----------------------------------------------------------------------
BK_STOP 1717007215764
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLCardinality -timeout 360 -rebuildPNML
MEDDLY ERROR: Insufficient memory
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldPPPt-PT-004B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="greatspnxred"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool greatspnxred"
echo " Input is ShieldPPPt-PT-004B, examination is LTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r355-tall-171683759100587"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldPPPt-PT-004B.tgz
mv ShieldPPPt-PT-004B execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;