About the Execution of GreatSPN+red for ShieldIIPt-PT-002A
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
360.119 | 13371.00 | 25345.00 | 50.20 | FFFFFFFFFFFFFFTF | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r355-tall-171683758200196.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool greatspnxred
Input is ShieldIIPt-PT-002A, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r355-tall-171683758200196
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 448K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 72K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.8K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 46K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.3K Apr 23 07:52 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 22K Apr 23 07:52 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K Apr 23 07:52 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Apr 23 07:52 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K Apr 12 20:44 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 127K Apr 12 20:44 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.4K Apr 12 20:43 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 63K Apr 12 20:43 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Apr 23 07:52 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 23 07:52 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 18 16:43 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1716925482090
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=greatspnxred
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldIIPt-PT-002A
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Applying reductions before tool greatspn
Invoking reducer
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-28 19:44:43] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -timeout, 360, -rebuildPNML]
[2024-05-28 19:44:43] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-28 19:44:43] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 40 ms
[2024-05-28 19:44:43] [INFO ] Transformed 41 places.
[2024-05-28 19:44:43] [INFO ] Transformed 31 transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:44:43] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-28 19:44:43] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 41 places and 31 transitions and 126 arcs in 131 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 11 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 4 formulas.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 1 transitions.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 28 out of 41 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 41 /41 variables (removed 0) and now considering 30/30 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 30 rows 41 cols
[2024-05-28 19:44:43] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 8 ms
[2024-05-28 19:44:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 168 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:44:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:44:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 76 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 275 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 29 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:44:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 71/71 variables, and 101 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 471 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 29/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 71/71 variables, and 130 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 360 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 868ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 884ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1184 ms. Remains : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Support contains 28 out of 41 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-28 19:44:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2024-05-28 19:44:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-28 19:44:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 30 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 23 to 20
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 832 ms. (48 steps per ms) remains 1/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 216 ms. (184 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2024-05-28 19:44:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp12 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 7/71 variables, and 7 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 24 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 4/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/19 constraints, State Equation: 0/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 30ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 12 simplifications.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(X(F(p0)))))'
Support contains 2 out of 41 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 41 /41 variables (removed 0) and now considering 30/30 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:44:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:44:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:44:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:44:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 51 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 93 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 29 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:44:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 71/71 variables, and 101 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 299 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 29/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 71/71 variables, and 130 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 337 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 647ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 648ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 742 ms. Remains : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 257 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-00
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2167 reset in 274 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 6 steps with 0 reset with depth 7 and stack size 7 in 1 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-00 finished in 1336 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 41 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 41 /41 variables (removed 0) and now considering 30/30 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:44:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:44:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:44:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:44:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 44 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 88 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 29 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:44:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 71/71 variables, and 101 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 293 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 29/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 71/71 variables, and 130 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 311 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 618ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 618ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 708 ms. Remains : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 78 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-01
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2837 reset in 244 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 5 steps with 0 reset with depth 6 and stack size 6 in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-01 finished in 1052 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F((p0||(p1 U p2)))))'
Support contains 5 out of 41 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 41 /41 variables (removed 0) and now considering 30/30 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:44:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:44:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:44:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:44:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 40 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 86 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 29 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:44:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 71/71 variables, and 101 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 273 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 29/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 71/71 variables, and 130 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 332 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 615ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 617ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 706 ms. Remains : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 86 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-02
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3770 reset in 210 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 5 steps with 0 reset with depth 6 and stack size 6 in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-02 finished in 1021 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(G(p0))))'
Support contains 1 out of 41 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 41 /41 variables (removed 0) and now considering 30/30 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:44:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:44:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:44:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:44:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 46 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 87 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 29 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:44:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 71/71 variables, and 101 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 267 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 29/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 71/71 variables, and 130 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 302 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 576ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 577ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 667 ms. Remains : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 126 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-04
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 71 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-04 finished in 817 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((F(p0) U X((G(F(!p2))&&p1))))'
Support contains 5 out of 41 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 41 /41 variables (removed 0) and now considering 30/30 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:44:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:44:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:44:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:44:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 44 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 86 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 29 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:44:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 71/71 variables, and 101 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 280 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 29/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 71/71 variables, and 130 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 315 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 602ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 602ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 689 ms. Remains : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 367 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) p2), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) p2)), (OR (NOT p1) p2), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) p2), (AND (NOT p0) p2), p2, p2]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-05
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 19678 reset in 139 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 12 steps with 2 reset with depth 5 and stack size 5 in 1 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-05 finished in 1220 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((p0||X(G((p1&&F(p0)))))))'
Support contains 3 out of 41 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 41 /41 variables (removed 0) and now considering 30/30 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:44:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:44:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:44:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:44:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 51 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 97 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 29 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:44:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 71/71 variables, and 101 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 292 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 29/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 71/71 variables, and 130 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 306 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 603ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 604ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 703 ms. Remains : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 182 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), true, (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-06
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 14109 steps with 986 reset in 23 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-06 finished in 931 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G(p0) U (F(p1) U X(X(G(!p2))))))'
Support contains 5 out of 41 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 41 /41 variables (removed 0) and now considering 30/30 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:44:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:44:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:44:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:44:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 41 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 77 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 29 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:44:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 71/71 variables, and 101 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 277 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 29/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 71/71 variables, and 130 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 316 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 600ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 601ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 680 ms. Remains : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 339 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) p2), (AND (NOT p1) p2 (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) p2), p2, (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) p2), p2, (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-07
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 24644 reset in 107 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 26826 steps with 6649 reset with depth 15 and stack size 15 in 39 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-07 finished in 1193 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F((p0||G((p1&&F(p2)))))))'
Support contains 7 out of 41 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 41 /41 variables (removed 0) and now considering 30/30 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:44:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:44:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:44:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:44:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 40 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 80 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 29 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 19:44:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 71/71 variables, and 101 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 262 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 19/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/71 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 29/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 71/71 variables, and 130 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 311 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 41/41 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 578ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 578ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 660 ms. Remains : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 144 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-10
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 7092 reset in 139 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 14 steps with 1 reset with depth 7 and stack size 7 in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-10 finished in 959 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((p0&&G(p1)&&X(G(p2)))))'
Support contains 4 out of 41 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 41 transition count 29
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 40 transition count 29
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 39 transition count 28
Applied a total of 4 rules in 21 ms. Remains 39 /41 variables (removed 2) and now considering 28/30 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 28 rows 39 cols
[2024-05-28 19:44:54] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-28 19:44:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned [31, 32]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 34 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 37/41 places, 28/30 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 37 transition count 27
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 36 transition count 27
Applied a total of 2 rules in 3 ms. Remains 36 /37 variables (removed 1) and now considering 27/28 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 27 rows 36 cols
[2024-05-28 19:44:54] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-28 19:44:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned [25]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 34 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 35/41 places, 27/30 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 34 transition count 26
Applied a total of 2 rules in 3 ms. Remains 34 /35 variables (removed 1) and now considering 26/27 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 26 rows 34 cols
[2024-05-28 19:44:54] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-28 19:44:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:44:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:44:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 53 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 82 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 3 : 34/41 places, 26/30 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 3 iterations and 177 ms. Remains : 34/41 places, 26/30 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 149 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p1), (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-11
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 192 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 13 steps with 0 reset with depth 14 and stack size 14 in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-11 finished in 540 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(p0))'
Support contains 2 out of 41 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 41 transition count 29
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 40 transition count 29
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 39 transition count 28
Applied a total of 4 rules in 3 ms. Remains 39 /41 variables (removed 2) and now considering 28/30 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 28 rows 39 cols
[2024-05-28 19:44:54] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-28 19:44:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned [31, 32]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 46 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 37/41 places, 28/30 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 37 transition count 27
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 36 transition count 27
Applied a total of 2 rules in 3 ms. Remains 36 /37 variables (removed 1) and now considering 27/28 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 27 rows 36 cols
[2024-05-28 19:44:54] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-28 19:44:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned [25]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 33 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 35/41 places, 27/30 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 34 transition count 26
Applied a total of 2 rules in 5 ms. Remains 34 /35 variables (removed 1) and now considering 26/27 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 26 rows 34 cols
[2024-05-28 19:44:54] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-28 19:44:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 19:44:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 19:44:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 35 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 72 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 3 : 34/41 places, 26/30 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 3 iterations and 162 ms. Remains : 34/41 places, 26/30 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 26 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-12
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1835 reset in 110 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 60 steps with 1 reset with depth 20 and stack size 20 in 1 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-12 finished in 316 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F((!(p0 U ((p1 U p2)||p1))&&G(F(X(p3)))))))'
Support contains 5 out of 41 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 41/41 places, 30/30 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 41 transition count 29
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 40 transition count 29
Applied a total of 2 rules in 3 ms. Remains 40 /41 variables (removed 1) and now considering 29/30 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 29 rows 40 cols
[2024-05-28 19:44:55] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-28 19:44:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned [31]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 39 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 39/41 places, 29/30 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 39 /39 variables (removed 0) and now considering 29/29 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 43 ms. Remains : 39/41 places, 29/30 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 166 ms :[(OR (NOT p3) p2 p1), (NOT p3), (OR p1 p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-15
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2667 reset in 133 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 1621 steps with 42 reset with depth 45 and stack size 42 in 3 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-002A-LTLFireability-15 finished in 369 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 12189 ms.
ITS solved all properties within timeout
BK_STOP 1716925495461
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -timeout 360 -rebuildPNML
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldIIPt-PT-002A"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="greatspnxred"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool greatspnxred"
echo " Input is ShieldIIPt-PT-002A, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r355-tall-171683758200196"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldIIPt-PT-002A.tgz
mv ShieldIIPt-PT-002A execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;