About the Execution of GreatSPN+red for ShieldIIPs-PT-003B
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
13925.323 | 3600000.00 | 11742718.00 | 3885.90 | ???FF????TF?T??? | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r355-tall-171683757900041.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool greatspnxred
Input is ShieldIIPs-PT-003B, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r355-tall-171683757900041
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 496K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 73K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.6K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 54K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.3K May 19 07:15 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 23K May 19 16:28 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K May 19 07:30 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 19 19:00 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.1K Apr 11 14:27 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 95K Apr 11 14:27 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.5K Apr 11 14:27 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 87K Apr 11 14:27 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Apr 23 07:51 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 23 07:51 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 49K May 18 16:43 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2023-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1716877138072
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=greatspnxred
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldIIPs-PT-003B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Applying reductions before tool greatspn
Invoking reducer
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-28 06:18:59] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -timeout, 360, -rebuildPNML]
[2024-05-28 06:18:59] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-28 06:18:59] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 78 ms
[2024-05-28 06:18:59] [INFO ] Transformed 183 places.
[2024-05-28 06:18:59] [INFO ] Transformed 180 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:18:59] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-28 06:18:59] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 183 places and 180 transitions and 540 arcs in 192 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 20 ms.
Support contains 88 out of 183 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 183/183 places, 180/180 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 176 transition count 173
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 176 transition count 173
Applied a total of 14 rules in 28 ms. Remains 176 /183 variables (removed 7) and now considering 173/180 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 173 rows 176 cols
[2024-05-28 06:18:59] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 17 ms
[2024-05-28 06:18:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 231 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 06:18:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 06:19:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 172 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 433 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 172 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:19:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/175 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/176 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:19:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 98 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 66 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 60 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 71 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 104 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 51 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 20/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:19:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 56 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 20/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:19:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 63 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 6/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:19:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 5/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 4/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 1/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:19:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 1/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:19:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 76 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 4/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 1/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 173/349 variables, 176/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:19:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 48 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 58 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 15/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 40 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 18/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:19:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 72 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 5/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:19:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 10/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:19:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 39 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 12/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:19:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 2/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 4/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:19:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 39 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 4/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 0/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 39 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 0/349 variables, 8/364 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 349/349 variables, and 368 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved in 30030 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 176/176 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 172/172 constraints, Known Traps: 164/164 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/175 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/176 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 164/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:19:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 6/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 61 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 60 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 42 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 17/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 4/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 173/349 variables, 176/395 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 172/567 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 61 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 64 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 69 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 55 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 11/578 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:19:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 58 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 4/582 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:19:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 9/591 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:19:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-28 06:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 3/594 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 349/349 variables, and 594 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved in 30030 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 176/176 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 172/172 constraints, Known Traps: 218/218 constraints]
After SMT, in 60131ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60153ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 176/183 places, 173/180 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60633 ms. Remains : 176/183 places, 173/180 transitions.
Support contains 88 out of 176 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-28 06:20:00] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 2 formulas.
[2024-05-28 06:20:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 51 ms
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2024-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2024-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-28 06:20:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-28 06:20:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 173 transitions.
Support contains 81 out of 176 places (down from 88) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (88 resets) in 1308 ms. (30 steps per ms) remains 2/56 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (12 resets) in 209 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (12 resets) in 110 ms. (360 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
[2024-05-28 06:20:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 71/79 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 97/176 variables, 17/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 173/349 variables, 176/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 0/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/349 variables, 0/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 349/349 variables, and 204 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 135 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 176/176 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 71/79 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
[2024-05-28 06:20:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp29 is UNSAT
[2024-05-28 06:20:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp47 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 79/349 variables, and 13 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved in 126 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/28 constraints, State Equation: 0/176 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/2 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 270ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 12 simplifications.
[2024-05-28 06:20:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-28 06:20:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-28 06:20:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 173 transitions.
Computed a total of 44 stabilizing places and 44 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 176/176 places, 173/173 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 163 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 163 transition count 160
Applied a total of 26 rules in 15 ms. Remains 163 /176 variables (removed 13) and now considering 160/173 (removed 13) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 16 ms. Remains : 163/176 places, 160/173 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:20:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-28 06:20:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-28 06:20:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 160 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 176/176 places, 173/173 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 11 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 11 transitions
Performed 11 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 11
Iterating post reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 175 transition count 161
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 164 transition count 159
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 162 transition count 159
Performed 16 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 16 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 162 transition count 143
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 146 transition count 143
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 133 transition count 130
Iterating global reduction 3 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 133 transition count 130
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 133 transition count 128
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 131 transition count 128
Performed 38 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 38
Deduced a syphon composed of 38 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 38 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 76 rules applied. Total rules applied 164 place count 93 transition count 90
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 166 place count 91 transition count 88
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 167 place count 90 transition count 88
Applied a total of 167 rules in 44 ms. Remains 90 /176 variables (removed 86) and now considering 88/173 (removed 85) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 44 ms. Remains : 90/176 places, 88/173 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:20:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 06:20:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-28 06:20:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 88 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 176/176 places, 173/173 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 167 transition count 164
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 167 transition count 164
Applied a total of 18 rules in 5 ms. Remains 167 /176 variables (removed 9) and now considering 164/173 (removed 9) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5 ms. Remains : 167/176 places, 164/173 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:20:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-28 06:20:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-28 06:20:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 164 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 176/176 places, 173/173 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 167 transition count 164
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 167 transition count 164
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 166 transition count 163
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 166 transition count 163
Applied a total of 20 rules in 7 ms. Remains 166 /176 variables (removed 10) and now considering 163/173 (removed 10) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7 ms. Remains : 166/176 places, 163/173 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:20:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-28 06:20:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-28 06:20:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 163 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 176/176 places, 173/173 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 12 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 12 transitions
Performed 12 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 12
Iterating post reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 175 transition count 160
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 163 transition count 160
Performed 13 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 13 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 163 transition count 147
Deduced a syphon composed of 13 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 150 transition count 147
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 138 transition count 135
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 138 transition count 135
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 138 transition count 131
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 134 transition count 131
Performed 46 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 46
Deduced a syphon composed of 46 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 46 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 92 rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 88 transition count 85
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 175 place count 87 transition count 84
Applied a total of 175 rules in 24 ms. Remains 87 /176 variables (removed 89) and now considering 84/173 (removed 89) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 25 ms. Remains : 87/176 places, 84/173 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:20:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 06:20:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 06:20:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 176/176 places, 173/173 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 16 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 16 transitions
Performed 16 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 175 transition count 156
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 159 transition count 156
Performed 16 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 16 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 159 transition count 140
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 143 transition count 140
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 78 place count 129 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 129 transition count 126
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 129 transition count 121
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 124 transition count 121
Performed 47 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 47
Deduced a syphon composed of 47 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 47 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 94 rules applied. Total rules applied 196 place count 77 transition count 74
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 198 place count 75 transition count 72
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 199 place count 74 transition count 72
Applied a total of 199 rules in 26 ms. Remains 74 /176 variables (removed 102) and now considering 72/173 (removed 101) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 27 ms. Remains : 74/176 places, 72/173 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:20:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 06:20:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 06:20:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 72 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 176/176 places, 173/173 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 163 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 163 transition count 160
Applied a total of 26 rules in 5 ms. Remains 163 /176 variables (removed 13) and now considering 160/173 (removed 13) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5 ms. Remains : 163/176 places, 160/173 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:20:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-28 06:20:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-28 06:20:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 160 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 176/176 places, 173/173 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 162 transition count 159
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 162 transition count 159
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 161 transition count 158
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 161 transition count 158
Applied a total of 30 rules in 7 ms. Remains 161 /176 variables (removed 15) and now considering 158/173 (removed 15) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7 ms. Remains : 161/176 places, 158/173 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:20:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-28 06:20:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-28 06:20:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 158 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 176/176 places, 173/173 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 162 transition count 159
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 162 transition count 159
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 161 transition count 158
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 161 transition count 158
Applied a total of 30 rules in 7 ms. Remains 161 /176 variables (removed 15) and now considering 158/173 (removed 15) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7 ms. Remains : 161/176 places, 158/173 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:20:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-28 06:20:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-28 06:20:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 158 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 176/176 places, 173/173 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 15 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 15 transitions
Performed 15 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 15
Iterating post reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 175 transition count 157
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 160 transition count 157
Performed 16 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 16 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 160 transition count 141
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 144 transition count 141
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 74 place count 132 transition count 129
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 132 transition count 129
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 132 transition count 126
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 129 transition count 126
Performed 49 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 49
Deduced a syphon composed of 49 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 49 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 98 rules applied. Total rules applied 190 place count 80 transition count 77
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 192 place count 78 transition count 75
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 193 place count 77 transition count 75
Applied a total of 193 rules in 21 ms. Remains 77 /176 variables (removed 99) and now considering 75/173 (removed 98) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 21 ms. Remains : 77/176 places, 75/173 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:20:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 06:20:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 06:20:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 75 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 176/176 places, 173/173 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 15 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 15 transitions
Performed 15 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 15
Iterating post reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 175 transition count 157
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 160 transition count 157
Performed 16 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 16 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 160 transition count 141
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 144 transition count 141
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 131 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 131 transition count 128
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 131 transition count 124
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 127 transition count 124
Performed 48 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 48
Deduced a syphon composed of 48 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 48 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 96 rules applied. Total rules applied 192 place count 79 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 194 place count 77 transition count 74
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 195 place count 76 transition count 74
Applied a total of 195 rules in 19 ms. Remains 76 /176 variables (removed 100) and now considering 74/173 (removed 99) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 19 ms. Remains : 76/176 places, 74/173 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:20:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 06:20:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 06:20:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 74 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 137 steps (0 resets) in 6 ms. (19 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 176/176 places, 173/173 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 163 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 163 transition count 160
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 162 transition count 159
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 162 transition count 159
Applied a total of 28 rules in 6 ms. Remains 162 /176 variables (removed 14) and now considering 159/173 (removed 14) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7 ms. Remains : 162/176 places, 159/173 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:20:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-28 06:20:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-28 06:20:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 159 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 176/176 places, 173/173 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 15 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 15 transitions
Performed 15 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 15
Iterating post reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 175 transition count 157
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 160 transition count 156
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 159 transition count 156
Performed 16 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 16 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 159 transition count 140
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 143 transition count 140
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 78 place count 129 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 129 transition count 126
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 129 transition count 121
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 124 transition count 121
Performed 47 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 47
Deduced a syphon composed of 47 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 47 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 94 rules applied. Total rules applied 196 place count 77 transition count 74
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 198 place count 75 transition count 72
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 199 place count 74 transition count 72
Applied a total of 199 rules in 19 ms. Remains 74 /176 variables (removed 102) and now considering 72/173 (removed 101) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 20 ms. Remains : 74/176 places, 72/173 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:20:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 06:20:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 06:20:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 72 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 176/176 places, 173/173 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 162 transition count 159
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 162 transition count 159
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 161 transition count 158
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 161 transition count 158
Applied a total of 30 rules in 7 ms. Remains 161 /176 variables (removed 15) and now considering 158/173 (removed 15) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7 ms. Remains : 161/176 places, 158/173 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:20:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 06:20:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-28 06:20:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 158 transitions.
[2024-05-28 06:20:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-28 06:20:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-28 06:20:02] [INFO ] Export to MCC of 13 properties in file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.sr.xml took 3 ms.
[2024-05-28 06:20:02] [INFO ] Export to PNML in file /home/mcc/execution/model.sr.pnml of net with 176 places, 173 transitions and 526 arcs took 1 ms.
Total runtime 62886 ms.
There are residual formulas that ITS could not solve within timeout
----------------------------------------------------------------------
GreatSPN-meddly tool, MCC 2023
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Running ShieldIIPs-PT-003B
IS_COLORED=
IS_NUPN=
LOADING PETRI NET FILE /home/mcc/execution/412/model.pnml (PNML) ...
PNML VERSION 2009, P/T NET.
COLOR CLASSES: 0
CONSTANTS: 0
PLACES: 176
TRANSITIONS: 173
COLOR VARS: 0
MEASURES: 0
LOADING TIME: [User 0.000s, Sys 0.003s]
SAVING FILE /home/mcc/execution/412/model (.net / .def) ...
EXPORT TIME: [User 0.000s, Sys 0.000s]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
GreatSPN/Meddly.
Copyright (C) 1987-2022, University of Torino, Italy.
website: https://github.com/greatspn/SOURCES
Based on MEDDLY version 0.16.0
Copyright (C) 2009, Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc.
website: http://meddly.sourceforge.net
Process ID: 1215
MODEL NAME: /home/mcc/execution/412/model
176 places, 173 transitions.
Creating all event NSFs..
Creating all event NSFs..
Creating all event NSFs..
Creating all event NSFs..
Split: SplitSubtract
Start RS construction.
Split: SplitSubtract
Start RS construction.
Split: SplitSubtract
Start RS construction.
Split: SplitSubtract
Start RS construction.
Building monolithic NSF...
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2024-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS PARALLEL_PROCESSING UNFOLDING_TO_PT USE_NUPN TOPOLOGICAL
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2024-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS PARALLEL_PROCESSING UNFOLDING_TO_PT USE_NUPN TOPOLOGICAL
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -timeout 360 -rebuildPNML
MEDDLY ERROR: Insufficient memory
Error in allocating array of size 8388608 at unique_table.cc, line 313
MEDDLY ERROR: Insufficient memory
MEDDLY ERROR: Insufficient memory
Error in allocating array of size 8388608 at unique_table.cc, line 313
MEDDLY ERROR: Insufficient memory
MEDDLY ERROR: Insufficient memory
MEDDLY ERROR: Insufficient memory
MEDDLY ERROR: Insufficient memory
MEDDLY ERROR: Insufficient memory
MEDDLY ERROR: Insufficient memory
Error in allocating array of size 2097152 at unique_table.cc, line 313
MEDDLY ERROR: Insufficient memory
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldIIPs-PT-003B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="greatspnxred"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool greatspnxred"
echo " Input is ShieldIIPs-PT-003B, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r355-tall-171683757900041"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldIIPs-PT-003B.tgz
mv ShieldIIPs-PT-003B execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;