Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r334-tall-171679080300410.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is SafeBus-PT-03, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r334-tall-171679080300410
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 732K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.5K Apr 12 14:42 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 77K Apr 12 14:42 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Apr 12 14:37 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 69K Apr 12 14:37 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.2K Apr 23 07:49 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 32K Apr 23 07:49 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.2K Apr 23 07:49 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 32K Apr 23 07:49 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Apr 12 14:49 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 138K Apr 12 14:49 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K Apr 12 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 154K Apr 12 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K Apr 23 07:49 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.1K Apr 23 07:49 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 95K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-PT-03-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-PT-03-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-PT-03-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-PT-03-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-PT-03-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-PT-03-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-PT-03-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-PT-03-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-PT-03-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-PT-03-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-PT-03-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-PT-03-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-PT-03-CTLFireability-2024-12
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-PT-03-CTLFireability-2024-13
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-PT-03-CTLFireability-2024-14
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-PT-03-CTLFireability-2024-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716828402180

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=SafeBus-PT-03
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-27 16:46:43] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-27 16:46:43] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-27 16:46:43] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 63 ms
[2024-05-27 16:46:43] [INFO ] Transformed 57 places.
[2024-05-27 16:46:43] [INFO ] Transformed 91 transitions.
[2024-05-27 16:46:43] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-27 16:46:43] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 57 places and 91 transitions and 541 arcs in 158 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 14 ms.
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Support contains 52 out of 54 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 54/54 places, 91/91 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 91/91 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-27 16:46:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 23 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 54 cols
[2024-05-27 16:46:43] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 10 ms
[2024-05-27 16:46:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 183 ms returned []
[2024-05-27 16:46:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 23 similar events)
[2024-05-27 16:46:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 16:46:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-27 16:46:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 100 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 310 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 88 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-27 16:46:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 23 similar events)
[2024-05-27 16:46:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 16:46:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 54/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 7/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD11 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD15 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD16 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD20 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD24 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD25 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD29 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD33 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 16:46:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:46:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 69 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:46:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:46:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 103 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:46:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 109 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:46:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:46:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:46:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:46:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 81 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:46:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 38 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 16:46:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:46:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 2/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 16:46:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 1/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 16:46:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 51 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 1/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 68/122 variables, 54/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 122/122 variables, and 152 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved in 3512 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 54/54 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 54/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 7/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 14/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 16:46:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:46:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 102 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:46:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 74 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:46:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 4/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 68/122 variables, 54/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 79/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 122/122 variables, and 235 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved in 2369 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 54/54 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/88 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints]
After SMT, in 5992ms problems are : Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 9 dead transitions in 6010ms
Found 9 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 9 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 9 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 54/54 places, 82/91 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 6350 ms. Remains : 54/54 places, 82/91 transitions.
Support contains 52 out of 54 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-27 16:46:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2024-05-27 16:46:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2024-05-27 16:46:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 66 to 58
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 2449 ms. (16 steps per ms) remains 10/58 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 615 ms. (64 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 145 ms. (273 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 395 ms. (101 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 182 ms. (218 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (8 resets) in 224 ms. (177 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 147 ms. (270 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 124 ms. (320 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (8 resets) in 135 ms. (294 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 102 ms. (388 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 84 ms. (470 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
[2024-05-27 16:46:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 54 cols
[2024-05-27 16:46:52] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-27 16:46:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 38/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp1 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 2/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 2/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 9 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 9 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp14 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp40 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp59 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 11/49 variables, 5/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 11/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp24 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp34 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp45 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 3/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 3 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp26 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp35 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp61 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 54/122 variables, and 66 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 10 solved, 0 unsolved in 214 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 49/54 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 0/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 242ms problems are : Problem set: 10 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 10 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
FORMULA SafeBus-PT-03-CTLFireability-2024-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA SafeBus-PT-03-CTLFireability-2024-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-27 16:46:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-27 16:46:52] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA SafeBus-PT-03-CTLFireability-2024-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-27 16:46:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-27 16:46:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-27 16:46:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 16:46:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 16:46:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2024-05-27 16:46:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 16:46:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 16:46:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-27 16:46:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 68 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 114 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 79 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-27 16:46:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 16:46:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 16:46:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 54/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 7/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 16:46:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:46:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:46:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:46:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:46:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:46:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:46:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:46:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:46:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 9/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 16:46:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:46:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:46:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 3/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 16:46:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:46:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:46:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 3/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 68/122 variables, 54/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 122/122 variables, and 153 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 2486 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 54/54 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 54/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 7/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 15/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 16:46:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:46:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 2/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 68/122 variables, 54/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 79/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 122/122 variables, and 234 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 1810 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 54/54 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints]
After SMT, in 4338ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4344ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4459 ms. Remains : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 16:46:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-27 16:46:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-27 16:46:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 16:46:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-27 16:46:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-27 16:46:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18274457117954481071.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-27 16:46:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11879737818929985656.ctl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18274457117954481071.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11879737818929985656.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4650,0.092407,7052,2,1545,5,13321,6,0,301,13010,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!((A(!((((((((Cpt2_3==1)&&(AMC_1_3==1))&&((FMCb==1)&&(cable_free==1)))||(((Cpt2_1==1)&&(AMC_2_1==1))&&((FMCb==1)&&(cable_free==1))))||(...1605
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(FwdU(Init,!((!((E(!((!(EG(!((((((T_out==1)&&(wait_ack_3_1==1))||((T_out==1)&&(wait_ack_2_1==1)))||(((...2745
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t25, t26, t27, t37, t38, t39, t64, t65, t66, t70, t71, t72, t73, t74,...289
Using saturation style SCC detection
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 27/30/55
(forward)formula 0,0,1.75164,64584,1,0,342,265162,211,205,2878,294437,351
FORMULA SafeBus-PT-03-CTLFireability-2024-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-27 16:46:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 16:46:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 16:46:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2024-05-27 16:46:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 16:46:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 16:46:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-27 16:46:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 70 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 125 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 79 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-27 16:46:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 16:46:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 16:46:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 54/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 7/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 16:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 9/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 16:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 3/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 16:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 3/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 68/122 variables, 54/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 122/122 variables, and 153 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 2440 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 54/54 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 54/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 7/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 15/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 16:47:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:47:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 2/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 68/122 variables, 54/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 79/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 122/122 variables, and 234 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 1762 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 54/54 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints]
After SMT, in 4242ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4246ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4373 ms. Remains : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 16:47:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 16:47:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15215408260752876286.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1908497698991555444.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15215408260752876286.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1908497698991555444.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4650,0.084514,7128,2,1545,5,13321,6,0,301,13010,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((EX((((((PMC_2==0)||(wait_cable_2==0))&&((PMC_3==0)||(wait_cable_3==0)))&&(((PMC_2==0)||(wait_cable_2==0))&&((PMC_1==0)||(wait_cable_...985
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(((((S_tout==0)||(FMC_1==0))&&((S_tout==0)||(FMC_2==0)))&&((S_tout==0)||(FMC_3==0)))))...1087
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t25, t26, t27, t37, t38, t39, t64, t65, t66, t70, t71, t72, t73, t74,...289
(forward)formula 0,0,0.526989,24932,1,0,271,106490,193,116,2639,88381,272
FORMULA SafeBus-PT-03-CTLFireability-2024-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-27 16:47:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 16:47:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 16:47:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2024-05-27 16:47:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 16:47:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 16:47:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-27 16:47:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 76 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 130 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 79 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-27 16:47:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 16:47:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 16:47:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 54/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 7/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 16:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 9/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 16:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 3/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 16:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 3/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 68/122 variables, 54/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 122/122 variables, and 153 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 2375 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 54/54 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 54/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 7/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 15/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 16:47:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:47:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 2/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 68/122 variables, 54/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 79/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 122/122 variables, and 234 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 1727 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 54/54 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints]
After SMT, in 4129ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4130ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4263 ms. Remains : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 16:47:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 16:47:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6956299016932241038.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7337277439081037538.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6956299016932241038.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7337277439081037538.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4650,0.08528,7128,2,1545,5,13321,6,0,301,13010,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((((AX(EF(((((MSG_1==0)||(listen_1==0))&&((MSG_2==0)||(listen_2==0)))&&((MSG_3==0)||(listen_3==0))))) + EG(((((((ACK==0)||(wait_ack_2_3...804
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((((MSG_1==1)&&(wait_msg_1==1))||((MSG_2==1)&&(wait_msg_2==1))))) * !((!(EX(!(E(TRU...1415
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t25, t26, t27, t37, t38, t39, t64, t65, t66, t70, t71, t72, t73, t74,...289
(forward)formula 0,1,0.63013,27112,1,0,266,118275,204,110,2627,93481,265
FORMULA SafeBus-PT-03-CTLFireability-2024-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-27 16:47:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 16:47:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 16:47:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned [42, 43, 44]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 44 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 51/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 51 /51 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 46 ms. Remains : 51/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 16:47:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 16:47:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11316395598634460560.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16515727055486602038.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11316395598634460560.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16515727055486602038.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4650,0.072681,6552,2,1195,5,12286,6,0,289,11832,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EF((EF(((((((Cpt1_2==0)||(loop_em_1==0))&&((Cpt1_2==0)||(loop_em_2==0)))&&(((Cpt1_3==0)||(loop_em_1==0))&&((Cpt1_3==0)||(loop_em_2==0...4833
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (E(TRUE U ((((((Cpt1_2==0)||(loop_em_1==0))&&((Cpt1_2==0)||(loop_em_2==0)))&&(((...8815
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t25, t26, t27, t37, t38, t39, t64, t65, t66, t70, t71, t72, t73, t74,...289
(forward)formula 0,1,0.528407,21916,1,0,220,100079,203,97,2592,71765,208
FORMULA SafeBus-PT-03-CTLFireability-2024-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-27 16:47:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 16:47:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 16:47:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
[2024-05-27 16:47:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 16:47:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 16:47:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-27 16:47:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 93 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 151 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 79 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-27 16:47:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 16:47:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 16:47:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 54/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 7/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 16:47:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:47:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:47:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:47:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:47:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:47:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:47:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:47:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:47:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 9/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 16:47:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:47:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:47:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 3/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 16:47:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:47:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:47:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 3/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 68/122 variables, 54/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 122/122 variables, and 153 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 2387 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 54/54 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 54/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 7/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 15/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 16:47:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 16:47:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 2/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 68/122 variables, 54/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 79/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 122/122 variables, and 234 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 1847 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 54/54 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints]
After SMT, in 4264ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4265ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4420 ms. Remains : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 16:47:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 16:47:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9505806585282041979.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11868813075525143283.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9505806585282041979.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11868813075525143283.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4650,0.086441,7128,2,1545,5,13321,6,0,301,13010,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EX(EG(EF(AG(((((PMC_2==1)&&(wait_cable_2==1))||((PMC_3==1)&&(wait_cable_3==1)))||((PMC_1==1)&&(wait_cable_1==1))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(EY(Init)),E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(((((PMC_2==1)&&(wait_cable_2==1))||((PMC_3==1)&&(wait_cable_3==1)))||((...200
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t25, t26, t27, t37, t38, t39, t64, t65, t66, t70, t71, t72, t73, t74,...289
(forward)formula 0,0,0.348921,16104,1,0,197,59242,192,82,2603,37910,178
FORMULA SafeBus-PT-03-CTLFireability-2024-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-27 16:47:14] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 16:47:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 16:47:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned [42, 43, 44]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 40 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 51/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 51 /51 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 41 ms. Remains : 51/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 16:47:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 16:47:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability52094091202474348.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13735124628616777334.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability52094091202474348.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13735124628616777334.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4650,0.07616,6556,2,1195,5,12286,6,0,289,11832,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((AX(((((A(((((MSG_3==1)&&(wait_msg_3==1))||((MSG_1==1)&&(wait_msg_1==1)))||((MSG_2==1)&&(wait_msg_2==1))) U ((((R_tout==1)&&(MSG_1==1...2715
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (!(EX(!(((((!((E(!(((((R_tout==1)&&(MSG_1==1))||((R_tout==1)&&(MSG_3==1)))||((R_tout==1)&&(...2992
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t25, t26, t27, t37, t38, t39, t64, t65, t66, t70, t71, t72, t73, t74,...289
(forward)formula 0,0,0.337059,15532,1,0,205,61292,194,86,2602,45969,183
FORMULA SafeBus-PT-03-CTLFireability-2024-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-27 16:47:14] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 16:47:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 16:47:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned [42, 43, 44]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 47 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 51/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 51 /51 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 48 ms. Remains : 51/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 16:47:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 16:47:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9062945611263961413.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5959926300534796171.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9062945611263961413.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5959926300534796171.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4650,0.080584,6552,2,1195,5,12286,6,0,289,11832,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EF(!(E(AF(((((((listen_1==1)&&(Cpt1_2==1))||((listen_1==1)&&(Cpt1_1==1)))||(((listen_2==1)&&(Cpt1_1==1))||((listen_2==1)&&(Cpt1_3==1))...2269
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * !(E(!(EG(!(((((((listen_1==1)&&(Cpt1_2==1))||((listen_1==1)&&(Cpt1_1==1)))||(((listen_2=...2327
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t25, t26, t27, t37, t38, t39, t64, t65, t66, t70, t71, t72, t73, t74,...289
(forward)formula 0,0,0.727548,30524,1,0,301,155311,193,127,2533,116896,318
FORMULA SafeBus-PT-03-CTLFireability-2024-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-27 16:47:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 16:47:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 16:47:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned [42, 43]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 45 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 52/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 52 /52 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 48 ms. Remains : 52/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 16:47:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 16:47:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13100114741216743987.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1350417755451465801.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13100114741216743987.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1350417755451465801.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4650,0.080789,6832,2,1255,5,12484,6,0,293,11612,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AF((A(!(((((Cpt2_2==1)&&(AMC_1_2==1))&&((cable_used_3==1)&&(FMCb==1)))||((RMC_3==1)&&(wait_cable_3==1)))) U E((((ACK==1)&&(wait_ack_2_1...621
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(FwdU(Init,!(EG(!((!((E(!(E((((ACK==1)&&(wait_ack_2_1==1))&&(FMCb==1)) U (((Cpt2_3==1)&&(AMC_1_3==1))&&(...1934
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t25, t26, t27, t37, t38, t39, t64, t65, t66, t70, t71, t72, t73, t74,...289
(forward)formula 0,0,1.4469,52840,1,0,264,247453,187,122,2487,187258,272
FORMULA SafeBus-PT-03-CTLFireability-2024-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 16 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-27 16:47:16] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 16:47:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 16:47:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned [42, 43, 44]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 51 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 51/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 51 transition count 79
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 48 transition count 79
Applied a total of 6 rules in 14 ms. Remains 48 /51 variables (removed 3) and now considering 79/82 (removed 3) transitions.
[2024-05-27 16:47:16] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 65 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 65 rows 48 cols
[2024-05-27 16:47:16] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
[2024-05-27 16:47:17] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 65 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 16:47:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 16:47:17] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-27 16:47:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 66 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 115 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 48/54 places, 79/82 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 197 ms. Remains : 48/54 places, 79/82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 16:47:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2024-05-27 16:47:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9137209651355346680.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14487193320956815177.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9137209651355346680.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14487193320956815177.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3048,0.05998,6012,2,1076,5,9994,6,0,274,9318,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(!(E(EG(!((((Cpt2_3==1)&&(AMC_3_3==1))&&((cable_used_2==1)&&(FMCb==1))))) U !(((EF((((Cpt2_3==1)&&(AMC_2_3==1))&&((FMCb==1)&&(cable_fre...198
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(EG(!((((Cpt2_3==1)&&(AMC_3_3==1))&&((cable_used_2==1)&&(FMCb==1))))) U !(((E(TRUE U (((C...256
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t25, t26, t27, t37, t38, t39, t61, t62, t63, t67, t68, t69, t70, t71,...289
(forward)formula 0,0,0.612388,26580,1,0,258,128310,192,119,2368,89346,273
FORMULA SafeBus-PT-03-CTLFireability-2024-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-27 16:47:17] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 54 cols
[2024-05-27 16:47:17] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned [42, 43, 44]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 44 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 51/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 51 /51 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 46 ms. Remains : 51/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 16:47:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 16:47:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3598385479976591423.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9042010009731928302.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3598385479976591423.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9042010009731928302.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4650,0.078742,6552,2,1195,5,12286,6,0,289,11832,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(!((((Cpt2_1==1)&&(AMC_3_1==1))&&((cable_used_1==1)&&(FMCb==1)))) U ((((!((((listen_3==1)&&(Cpt1_1==1))||(((Cpt2_2==1)&&(AMC_1_2==1))&&...848
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,!((((Cpt2_1==1)&&(AMC_3_1==1))&&((cable_used_1==1)&&(FMCb==1))))) * (((!((((listen_3==1)&&(Cpt1_1=...1307
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t25, t26, t27, t37, t38, t39, t64, t65, t66, t70, t71, t72, t73, t74,...289
(forward)formula 0,0,0.239646,12360,1,0,201,47147,182,85,2404,34426,177
FORMULA SafeBus-PT-03-CTLFireability-2024-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-27 16:47:18] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 16:47:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 16:47:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned [42, 43, 44]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 53 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 51/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 51 transition count 79
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 48 transition count 79
Applied a total of 6 rules in 5 ms. Remains 48 /51 variables (removed 3) and now considering 79/82 (removed 3) transitions.
[2024-05-27 16:47:18] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 65 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 65 rows 48 cols
[2024-05-27 16:47:18] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2024-05-27 16:47:18] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 65 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 16:47:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 16:47:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-27 16:47:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 67 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 114 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 48/54 places, 79/82 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 182 ms. Remains : 48/54 places, 79/82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 16:47:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2024-05-27 16:47:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12286941513358670981.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13045403589200044489.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12286941513358670981.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13045403589200044489.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3048,0.064219,6012,2,1076,5,9994,6,0,274,9318,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EF((E(EF((((ACK==1)&&(wait_ack_2_1==1))&&(FMCb==1))) U !(EF((((Cpt2_2==1)&&(AMC_1_2==1))&&((cable_used_3==1)&&(FMCb==1)))))) * AF(((Cpt...217
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,E(TRUE U (E(E(TRUE U (((ACK==1)&&(wait_ack_2_1==1))&&(FMCb==1))) U !(E(TRUE U (((Cpt2_2==1)&&(AMC_1_...287
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t25, t26, t27, t37, t38, t39, t61, t62, t63, t67, t68, t69, t70, t71,...289
(forward)formula 0,0,0.915895,37224,1,0,282,196334,193,133,2355,131564,311
FORMULA SafeBus-PT-03-CTLFireability-2024-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-27 16:47:19] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 54 cols
[2024-05-27 16:47:19] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned [42, 43, 44]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 56 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 51/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 51 /51 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 58 ms. Remains : 51/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 16:47:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 16:47:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2937833135173780666.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14281241962220334974.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2937833135173780666.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14281241962220334974.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4650,0.076433,6552,2,1195,5,12286,6,0,289,11832,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((AX(AX(((((Cpt2_1==0)||(AMC_1_1==0))||((cable_used_3==0)||(FMCb==0)))&&(((Cpt2_2==0)||(AMC_1_2==0))||((cable_used_2==0)||(FMCb==0))))...191
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((EY(Init) * (loop_em_2==1)) * (Cpt1_3==1)) * !(EX(!(!(EX(!(((((Cpt2_1==0)||(AMC_1_1==0))||((cable_used_3==0)|...248
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t25, t26, t27, t37, t38, t39, t64, t65, t66, t70, t71, t72, t73, t74,...289
(forward)formula 0,0,0.266242,13680,1,0,205,54284,183,86,2397,35273,178
FORMULA SafeBus-PT-03-CTLFireability-2024-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-27 16:47:19] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 16:47:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 16:47:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned [44]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 59 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 53/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 53 /53 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 61 ms. Remains : 53/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 16:47:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 16:47:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3579277954056370045.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7120117824933970287.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3579277954056370045.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7120117824933970287.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4650,0.095859,7380,2,1716,5,14659,6,0,297,14451,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AG(E(EF(!(((Cpt1_1==1)&&(loop_em_2==1)))) U (A(((S_tout==1)&&(FMC_3==1)) U ((PMC_2==1)&&(wait_cable_2==1))) + ((PMC_1==1)&&(wait_cable...166
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * !(E(E(TRUE U !(((Cpt1_1==1)&&(loop_em_2==1)))) U (!((E(!(((PMC_2==1)&&(wait_cable_2==1))...317
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t25, t26, t27, t37, t38, t39, t64, t65, t66, t70, t71, t72, t73, t74,...289
(forward)formula 0,1,0.703178,29252,1,0,251,147107,199,114,2572,96620,262
FORMULA SafeBus-PT-03-CTLFireability-2024-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2024-05-27 16:47:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-27 16:47:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Total runtime 36983 ms.

BK_STOP 1716828440384

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="SafeBus-PT-03"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is SafeBus-PT-03, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r334-tall-171679080300410"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/SafeBus-PT-03.tgz
mv SafeBus-PT-03 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;