Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r334-tall-171679080100354.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is SafeBus-COL-03, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r334-tall-171679080100354
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 540K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.9K Apr 12 14:41 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 87K Apr 12 14:41 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.7K Apr 12 14:36 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 40K Apr 12 14:36 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Apr 23 07:49 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K Apr 23 07:49 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.5K Apr 23 07:49 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K Apr 23 07:49 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K Apr 12 14:48 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 145K Apr 12 14:48 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.6K Apr 12 14:46 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 81K Apr 12 14:46 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Apr 23 07:49 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K Apr 23 07:49 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 equiv_pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 42K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2024-12
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2024-13
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2024-14
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2024-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716820004108

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=SafeBus-COL-03
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is COL
CTLFireability COL
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-27 14:26:45] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-27 14:26:45] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-27 14:26:45] [INFO ] Detected file is not PT type :http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.axiom.locator.DefaultOMMetaFactoryLocator).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info.
[2024-05-27 14:26:45] [WARNING] Using fallBack plugin, rng conformance not checked
[2024-05-27 14:26:45] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (colored model parsed with PNMLFW) : 557 ms
[2024-05-27 14:26:45] [INFO ] Detected 1 constant HL places corresponding to 3 PT places.
[2024-05-27 14:26:45] [INFO ] Imported 20 HL places and 14 HL transitions for a total of 60 PT places and 214.0 transition bindings in 21 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 11 ms.
[2024-05-27 14:26:46] [INFO ] Built PT skeleton of HLPN with 20 places and 14 transitions 68 arcs in 3 ms.
[2024-05-27 14:26:46] [INFO ] Skeletonized 8 HLPN properties in 1 ms. Removed 8 properties that had guard overlaps.
Computed a total of 3 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Remains 6 properties that can be checked using skeleton over-approximation.
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 779 ms. (51 steps per ms) remains 1/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (8 resets) in 295 ms. (135 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 14 rows 17 cols
[2024-05-27 14:26:46] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-27 14:26:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 7/11 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/14 variables, 2/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp4 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 15/31 variables, and 6 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 190 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 0/17 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 219ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 6 simplifications.
FORMULA SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2024-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-27 14:26:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-27 14:26:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Domain [It(3), It(3)] of place AMC breaks symmetries in sort It
[2024-05-27 14:26:46] [INFO ] Unfolded HLPN to a Petri net with 60 places and 97 transitions 556 arcs in 15 ms.
[2024-05-27 14:26:46] [INFO ] Unfolded 15 HLPN properties in 0 ms.
[2024-05-27 14:26:46] [INFO ] Reduced 3 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-27 14:26:46] [INFO ] Reduced 3 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-27 14:26:46] [INFO ] Reduced 3 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-27 14:26:46] [INFO ] Reduced 3 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-27 14:26:46] [INFO ] Reduced 3 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-27 14:26:46] [INFO ] Reduced 3 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-27 14:26:46] [INFO ] Reduced 3 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-27 14:26:46] [INFO ] Reduced 3 identical enabling conditions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 6 transitions.
Support contains 51 out of 54 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 54/54 places, 91/91 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 91/91 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:26:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 23 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 54 cols
[2024-05-27 14:26:46] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-27 14:26:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned []
[2024-05-27 14:26:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 23 similar events)
[2024-05-27 14:26:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 14:26:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-27 14:26:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 77 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 148 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 88 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:26:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 23 similar events)
[2024-05-27 14:26:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 14:26:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD11 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD15 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD16 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD20 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD24 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD25 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD29 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD33 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 14:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 12/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 14:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 65 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 2/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 68/122 variables, 54/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 122/122 variables, and 98 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved in 2117 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 14/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 14:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 1/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 68/122 variables, 54/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 79/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 14:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 1/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 14:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 1/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 122/122 variables, and 180 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved in 3225 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/88 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints]
After SMT, in 5425ms problems are : Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 9 dead transitions in 5430ms
Found 9 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 9 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 9 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 54/54 places, 82/91 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 5603 ms. Remains : 54/54 places, 82/91 transitions.
Support contains 51 out of 54 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-27 14:26:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 39 ms
[2024-05-27 14:26:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2024-05-27 14:26:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 28 to 25
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1021 ms. (39 steps per ms) remains 2/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 719 ms. (55 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 156 ms. (254 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
[2024-05-27 14:26:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 14:26:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 14:26:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
Problem AtomicPropp1 is UNSAT
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 14/42 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 2/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp20 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 53/122 variables, and 16 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved in 36 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 0/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 46ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 15 simplifications.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2024-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-27 14:26:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-27 14:26:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-05-27 14:26:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:26:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 14:26:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 14:26:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2024-05-27 14:26:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 14:26:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 14:26:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-27 14:26:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 56 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 96 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 79 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:26:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 14:26:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 14:26:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 14:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 9/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 14:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 3/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 68/122 variables, 54/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 122/122 variables, and 96 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 1668 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 12/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 14:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 2/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 68/122 variables, 54/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 79/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 122/122 variables, and 177 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 1661 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints]
After SMT, in 3361ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3362ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3460 ms. Remains : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:26:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-27 14:26:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-27 14:26:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:26:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-27 14:26:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-27 14:26:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7786841323631809234.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-27 14:26:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability854471480100462197.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7786841323631809234.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability854471480100462197.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4650,0.082959,6784,2,1426,5,12525,6,0,301,11920,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!((A(!((((((((Cpt2_0>=1)&&(cable_free>=1))&&((AMC_3>=1)&&(FMCb>=1)))||(((Cpt2_1>=1)&&(cable_free>=1))&&((AMC_4>=1)&&(FMCb>=1))))||((((C...1458
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(FwdU(Init,!((!((E(!((!(EG(!((((((wait_ack_1>=1)&&(T_out>=1))||((wait_ack_7>=1)&&(T_out>=1)))||(((wait...2574
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t25, t26, t27, t37, t38, t39, t64, t65, t66, t70, t71, t72, t73, t74,...289
Using saturation style SCC detection
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 27/30/55
(forward)formula 0,0,1.61196,61460,1,0,342,255890,211,205,2770,293950,351
FORMULA SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2024-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:26:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 14:26:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 14:26:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2024-05-27 14:26:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 14:26:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 14:26:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-27 14:26:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 64 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 113 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 79 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:26:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 14:26:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 14:26:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 14:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:26:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:26:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:26:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:26:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:26:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:26:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:26:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 9/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 14:26:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:26:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:26:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 3/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 68/122 variables, 54/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 122/122 variables, and 96 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 1627 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 12/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 14:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 2/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 68/122 variables, 54/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 79/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 122/122 variables, and 177 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 1688 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints]
After SMT, in 3349ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3350ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3464 ms. Remains : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:27:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:27:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1823229410519650322.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability70013810152708287.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1823229410519650322.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability70013810152708287.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...281
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4650,0.079994,6856,2,1426,5,12525,6,0,301,11920,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((EX(((((wait_cable_1<1)||(PMC_1<1))&&((wait_cable_2<1)||(PMC_2<1)))&&((wait_cable_0<1)||(PMC_0<1)))) + EG(((((FMC_1<1)||(S_tout<1))&&...814
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(((((FMC_1<1)||(S_tout<1))&&((FMC_2<1)||(S_tout<1)))&&((FMC_0<1)||(S_tout<1)))))) * !(...916
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t25, t26, t27, t37, t38, t39, t64, t65, t66, t70, t71, t72, t73, t74,...289
(forward)formula 0,0,0.555706,24056,1,0,271,101805,193,116,2643,86888,272
FORMULA SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2024-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:27:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 14:27:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 14:27:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2024-05-27 14:27:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 14:27:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 14:27:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-27 14:27:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 81 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 132 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 79 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:27:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 14:27:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 14:27:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 14:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 9/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 14:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 3/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 68/122 variables, 54/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 122/122 variables, and 96 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 1723 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 12/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 14:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 2/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 68/122 variables, 54/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 79/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 122/122 variables, and 177 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 1667 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints]
After SMT, in 3420ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3424ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3558 ms. Remains : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:27:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:27:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10212558373292596650.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6828420204400188353.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10212558373292596650.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6828420204400188353.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4650,0.085249,6860,2,1426,5,12525,6,0,301,11920,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((((AX(EF(((((listen_2<1)||(MSG_2<1))&&((listen_0<1)||(MSG_0<1)))&&((listen_1<1)||(MSG_1<1))))) + EG(((((((wait_ack_5<1)||(ACK<1))||(FM...657
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((((MSG_0>=1)&&(wait_msg_0>=1))||((MSG_1>=1)&&(wait_msg_1>=1))))) * !((!(EX(!(E(TRU...1232
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t25, t26, t27, t37, t38, t39, t64, t65, t66, t70, t71, t72, t73, t74,...289
(forward)formula 0,1,0.601752,26576,1,0,266,111252,204,110,2629,90212,265
FORMULA SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2024-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:27:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 14:27:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 14:27:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned [28, 29, 30]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 40 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 51/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 51 /51 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 42 ms. Remains : 51/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:27:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:27:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9352350686766990133.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10992228493614888321.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9352350686766990133.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10992228493614888321.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4650,0.06887,6556,2,1124,5,11611,6,0,289,11498,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EF((EF(((((((Cpt1_1<1)||(loop_em_1<1))&&((Cpt1_1<1)||(loop_em_2<1)))&&(((Cpt1_2<1)||(loop_em_0<1))&&((Cpt1_1<1)||(loop_em_0<1))))&&((...4677
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (E(TRUE U ((((((Cpt1_1<1)||(loop_em_1<1))&&((Cpt1_1<1)||(loop_em_2<1)))&&(((Cpt1...8533
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t25, t26, t27, t37, t38, t39, t64, t65, t66, t70, t71, t72, t73, t74,...289
(forward)formula 0,1,0.46213,19924,1,0,220,90396,203,97,2479,66682,208
FORMULA SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2024-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:27:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 14:27:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 14:27:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2024-05-27 14:27:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 14:27:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 14:27:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-27 14:27:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 96 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 148 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 79 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:27:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 14:27:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 14:27:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 14:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 9/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 14:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 3/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 68/122 variables, 54/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 122/122 variables, and 96 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 1711 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 12/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 14:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 2/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 68/122 variables, 54/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 79/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 122/122 variables, and 177 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 1731 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints]
After SMT, in 3482ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3483ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3633 ms. Remains : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:27:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:27:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16410874566466593211.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14523622613969909490.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16410874566466593211.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14523622613969909490.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4650,0.077199,6856,2,1426,5,12525,6,0,301,11920,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EX(EG(EF(AG(((((wait_cable_1>=1)&&(PMC_1>=1))||((wait_cable_2>=1)&&(PMC_2>=1)))||((wait_cable_0>=1)&&(PMC_0>=1))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(EY(Init)),E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(((((wait_cable_1>=1)&&(PMC_1>=1))||((wait_cable_2>=1)&&(PMC_2>=1)))||((...200
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t25, t26, t27, t37, t38, t39, t64, t65, t66, t70, t71, t72, t73, t74,...289
(forward)formula 0,0,0.319792,15304,1,0,197,56181,192,82,2579,36195,178
FORMULA SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2024-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:27:11] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 14:27:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 14:27:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned [28, 29, 30]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 39 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 51/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 51 /51 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 41 ms. Remains : 51/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:27:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:27:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5342295384543225242.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15994261838331303112.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5342295384543225242.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15994261838331303112.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4650,0.071795,6552,2,1124,5,11611,6,0,289,11498,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((AX(((((A(((((MSG_2>=1)&&(wait_msg_2>=1))||((MSG_0>=1)&&(wait_msg_0>=1)))||((MSG_1>=1)&&(wait_msg_1>=1))) U ((((MSG_1>=1)&&(R_tout>=1...2637
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (!(EX(!(((((!((E(!(((((MSG_1>=1)&&(R_tout>=1))||((MSG_2>=1)&&(R_tout>=1)))||((MSG_0>=1)&&(R...2914
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t25, t26, t27, t37, t38, t39, t64, t65, t66, t70, t71, t72, t73, t74,...289
(forward)formula 0,0,0.306388,14736,1,0,205,55865,194,86,2496,42484,183
FORMULA SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2024-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:27:11] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 14:27:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 14:27:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned [28, 29, 30]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 39 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 51/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 51 /51 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 40 ms. Remains : 51/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:27:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:27:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5993633712255542986.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3650329218736358549.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5993633712255542986.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3650329218736358549.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4650,0.071188,6544,2,1124,5,11611,6,0,289,11498,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EF(!(E(AF(((((((Cpt1_2>=1)&&(listen_2>=1))||((Cpt1_1>=1)&&(listen_1>=1)))||(((Cpt1_1>=1)&&(listen_2>=1))||((Cpt1_2>=1)&&(listen_0>=1))...2215
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * !(E(!(EG(!(((((((Cpt1_2>=1)&&(listen_2>=1))||((Cpt1_1>=1)&&(listen_1>=1)))||(((Cpt1_1>=1...2273
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t25, t26, t27, t37, t38, t39, t64, t65, t66, t70, t71, t72, t73, t74,...289
(forward)formula 0,0,0.746625,29112,1,0,301,141408,193,127,2481,112777,318
FORMULA SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2024-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:27:12] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 14:27:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 14:27:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2024-05-27 14:27:12] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 14:27:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 14:27:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-27 14:27:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 64 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 103 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 79 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:27:12] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 14:27:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 14:27:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 14:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 38 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 9/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 14:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 3/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 68/122 variables, 54/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 122/122 variables, and 96 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 1797 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 12/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 14:27:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 2/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 68/122 variables, 54/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 79/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 122/122 variables, and 177 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 1655 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints]
After SMT, in 3481ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3482ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3585 ms. Remains : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:27:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:27:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2298793214890052058.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16906242340954865032.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2298793214890052058.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16906242340954865032.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4650,0.084711,6860,2,1426,5,12525,6,0,301,11920,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(E(((((((Cpt1_2>=1)&&(listen_2>=1))||((Cpt1_1>=1)&&(listen_1>=1)))||(((Cpt1_1>=1)&&(listen_2>=1))||((Cpt1_2>=1)&&(listen_0>=1))))||((((...4644
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(((FwdU(EY(Init),((((((Cpt1_2>=1)&&(listen_2>=1))||((Cpt1_1>=1)&&(listen_1>=1)))||(((Cpt1_1>=1)&&(listen_2>=...8167
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t25, t26, t27, t37, t38, t39, t64, t65, t66, t70, t71, t72, t73, t74,...289
(forward)formula 0,0,0.414578,17748,1,0,211,66342,196,92,2726,54884,190
FORMULA SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2024-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 13 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:27:16] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 14:27:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 14:27:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned [28, 29, 30]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 40 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 51/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 51 transition count 79
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 48 transition count 79
Applied a total of 6 rules in 22 ms. Remains 48 /51 variables (removed 3) and now considering 79/82 (removed 3) transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:27:16] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 65 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 65 rows 48 cols
[2024-05-27 14:27:16] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2024-05-27 14:27:16] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 65 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 14:27:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 14:27:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-27 14:27:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 60 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 101 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 48/54 places, 79/82 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 177 ms. Remains : 48/54 places, 79/82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:27:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:27:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14179744860879017950.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2908087074035100459.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14179744860879017950.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2908087074035100459.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3048,0.057945,6004,2,1049,5,9633,6,0,274,9349,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(((((((((Cpt2_0<1)||(cable_used_2<1))||((AMC_3<1)||(FMCb<1)))&&(((Cpt2_0<1)||(cable_used_1<1))||((AMC_6<1)||(FMCb<1))))&&((((Cpt2_2<...1615
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(((((((((Cpt2_0<1)||(cable_used_2<1))||((AMC_3<1)||(FMCb<1)))&&(((Cpt2_0<1)||(ca...1679
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t25, t26, t27, t37, t38, t39, t61, t62, t63, t67, t68, t69, t70, t71,...289
(forward)formula 0,0,0.307287,14884,1,0,198,61556,180,84,2364,38452,181
FORMULA SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2024-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:27:17] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 54 cols
[2024-05-27 14:27:17] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2024-05-27 14:27:17] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 14:27:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 14:27:17] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-27 14:27:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 84 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 134 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 79 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:27:17] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 14:27:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 14:27:17] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 14:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 40 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 9/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 14:27:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 3/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 68/122 variables, 54/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 122/122 variables, and 96 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 1698 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 12/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 14:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 2/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 68/122 variables, 54/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 79/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 122/122 variables, and 177 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 1650 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints]
After SMT, in 3380ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3382ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3519 ms. Remains : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:27:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:27:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14967458116213779383.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3443395924045080491.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14967458116213779383.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3443395924045080491.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4650,0.076034,6864,2,1426,5,12525,6,0,301,11920,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AX(AG(AF(((((wait_cable_1>=1)&&(PMC_1>=1))||((wait_cable_2>=1)&&(PMC_2>=1)))||((wait_cable_0>=1)&&(PMC_0>=1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!(((((wait_cable_1>=1)&&(PMC_1>=1))||((wait_cable_2>=1)&&(PMC_2>=1)))||((w...204
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t25, t26, t27, t37, t38, t39, t64, t65, t66, t70, t71, t72, t73, t74,...289
(forward)formula 0,1,0.377003,21104,1,0,294,91976,190,122,2548,78339,297
FORMULA SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2024-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:27:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 14:27:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 14:27:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2024-05-27 14:27:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 14:27:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 14:27:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-27 14:27:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 59 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 100 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 79 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:27:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 14:27:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 14:27:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 14:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 9/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 14:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 3/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 68/122 variables, 54/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 122/122 variables, and 96 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 1698 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 12/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 14:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 2/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 68/122 variables, 54/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 79/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 122/122 variables, and 177 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 1631 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints]
After SMT, in 3355ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3357ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3459 ms. Remains : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:27:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:27:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9278728287285198370.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13944914399419785551.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9278728287285198370.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13944914399419785551.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4650,0.084602,6864,2,1426,5,12525,6,0,301,11920,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(E(EF(!(A(((((((wait_ack_5>=1)&&(ACK>=1))&&(FMCb>=1))||(((wait_ack_2>=1)&&(ACK>=1))&&(FMCb>=1)))||((((wait_ack_6>=1)&&(ACK>=1))&&(FMCb>=...1316
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,E(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!(((((((Cpt1_2>=1)&&(listen_2>=1))||((Cpt1_1>=1)&&(listen_1>=1)))||(((Cpt1_1>=1)&&...2001
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t25, t26, t27, t37, t38, t39, t64, t65, t66, t70, t71, t72, t73, t74,...289
(forward)formula 0,0,0.517784,23188,1,0,234,92953,193,104,2627,66307,231
FORMULA SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2024-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:27:25] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 14:27:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 14:27:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned [28, 29, 30]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 51 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 51/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 51 transition count 79
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 48 transition count 79
Applied a total of 6 rules in 4 ms. Remains 48 /51 variables (removed 3) and now considering 79/82 (removed 3) transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:27:25] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 65 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 65 rows 48 cols
[2024-05-27 14:27:25] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2024-05-27 14:27:25] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 65 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 14:27:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 14:27:25] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-27 14:27:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 67 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 120 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 48/54 places, 79/82 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 180 ms. Remains : 48/54 places, 79/82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:27:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:27:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3206174409232029384.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11203266262850302098.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3206174409232029384.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11203266262850302098.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3048,0.063066,6008,2,1049,5,9633,6,0,274,9349,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG((((((wait_ack_1>=1)&&(T_out>=1))||((wait_ack_7>=1)&&(T_out>=1)))||(((wait_ack_6>=1)&&(T_out>=1))||((wait_ack_5>=1)&&(T_out>=1))))||...220
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),(((((wait_ack_1>=1)&&(T_out>=1))||((wait_ack_7>=1)&&(T_out>=1)))||(((wait_ack_6>=1)&&(T_ou...270
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 57/0/22
(forward)formula 0,0,0.144869,8912,1,0,7,25690,19,1,1726,11568,8
FORMULA SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2024-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:27:25] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 54 cols
[2024-05-27 14:27:25] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2024-05-27 14:27:25] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 14:27:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 14:27:25] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-27 14:27:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 51 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 92 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 79 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:27:25] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 14:27:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 14:27:25] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 14:27:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 9/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 14:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 3/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 68/122 variables, 54/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 122/122 variables, and 96 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 1705 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 12/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
[2024-05-27 14:27:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 14:27:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 2/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 68/122 variables, 54/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 79/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 122/122 variables, and 177 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 1681 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints]
After SMT, in 3419ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3420ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3515 ms. Remains : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:27:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:27:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5675207416666973066.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5438047675689471625.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5675207416666973066.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5438047675689471625.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4650,0.085734,6860,2,1426,5,12525,6,0,301,11920,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E((!(A(!((((((((Cpt1_2>=1)&&(listen_2>=1))||((Cpt1_1>=1)&&(listen_1>=1)))||(((Cpt1_1>=1)&&(listen_2>=1))||((Cpt1_2>=1)&&(listen_0>=1)))...4807
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(!(!((E(!(!(EX(!(((((((wait_ack_5>=1)&&(ACK>=1))&&(FMCb>=1))||(((wait_ack_2>=1)&&(ACK>=1))&&(FMCb>=1...9089
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t25, t26, t27, t37, t38, t39, t64, t65, t66, t70, t71, t72, t73, t74,...289
(forward)formula 0,1,0.368827,16364,1,0,207,62744,185,89,2532,39295,193
FORMULA SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2024-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:27:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2024-05-27 14:27:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 14:27:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned [28, 29, 30]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 32 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 51/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 51 /51 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 44 ms. Remains : 51/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:27:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2024-05-27 14:27:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13919757260885308334.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12033718562797578818.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13919757260885308334.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12033718562797578818.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4650,0.071444,6548,2,1124,5,11611,6,0,289,11498,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(((AG(((((cable_used_0>=1)&&(FMC_0>=1))||((cable_used_2>=1)&&(FMC_2>=1)))||((cable_used_1>=1)&&(FMC_1>=1)))) + A((((((wait_ack_1>=1)&&...3815
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((Init * !(EG(((!(E(TRUE U !(((((cable_used_0>=1)&&(FMC_0>=1))||((cable_used_2>=1)&&(FMC_2>=1)))||((cable_used...6970
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t25, t26, t27, t37, t38, t39, t64, t65, t66, t70, t71, t72, t73, t74,...289
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,1.18158,44980,1,0,347,236784,225,169,2600,190031,368
FORMULA SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2024-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2024-05-27 14:27:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-27 14:27:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Total runtime 45530 ms.

BK_STOP 1716820050881

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="SafeBus-COL-03"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is SafeBus-COL-03, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r334-tall-171679080100354"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/SafeBus-COL-03.tgz
mv SafeBus-COL-03 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;