fond
Model Checking Contest 2024
14th edition, Geneva, Switzerland, June 25, 2024
Execution of r329-tall-171662361300008
Last Updated
July 7, 2024

About the Execution of 2023-gold for QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
686.220 29786.00 50846.00 515.80 FTFFTTTFTTFFTFFT normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r329-tall-171662361300008.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool gold2023
Input is QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r329-tall-171662361300008
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 528K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.7K Apr 13 03:51 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 81K Apr 13 03:51 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K Apr 13 03:49 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 57K Apr 13 03:49 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K Apr 23 07:44 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K Apr 23 07:44 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.5K Apr 23 07:44 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Apr 23 07:44 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Apr 13 03:55 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 116K Apr 13 03:55 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.7K Apr 13 03:53 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 70K Apr 13 03:53 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K Apr 23 07:44 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Apr 23 07:44 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 equiv_pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 61K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716762240102

bash -c /home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n "BK_STOP " ; date -u +%s%3N
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=gold2023
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06
Not applying reductions.
Model is COL
LTLFireability COL
Running Version 202304061127
[2024-05-26 22:24:01] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-26 22:24:01] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-26 22:24:01] [INFO ] Detected file is not PT type :http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.axiom.locator.DefaultOMMetaFactoryLocator).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info.
[2024-05-26 22:24:02] [WARNING] Using fallBack plugin, rng conformance not checked
[2024-05-26 22:24:02] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (colored model parsed with PNMLFW) : 738 ms
[2024-05-26 22:24:02] [INFO ] Imported 30 HL places and 26 HL transitions for a total of 270 PT places and 116.0 transition bindings in 16 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 9 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
[2024-05-26 22:24:02] [INFO ] Built PT skeleton of HLPN with 30 places and 26 transitions 77 arcs in 5 ms.
[2024-05-26 22:24:02] [INFO ] Skeletonized 16 HLPN properties in 8 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 4 formulas.
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Computed a total of 30 stabilizing places and 26 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 30 transition count 26
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Remains 10 properties that can be checked using skeleton over-approximation.
Computed a total of 30 stabilizing places and 26 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 30 transition count 26
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 760 resets, run finished after 199 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 19) seen :17
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 247 resets, run finished after 43 ms. (steps per millisecond=232 ) properties (out of 2) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 344 resets, run finished after 49 ms. (steps per millisecond=204 ) properties (out of 2) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 2 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 26 rows 30 cols
[2024-05-26 22:24:02] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 7 ms
[2024-05-26 22:24:03] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2024-05-26 22:24:03] [INFO ] After 24ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :1 real:1
[2024-05-26 22:24:03] [INFO ] After 31ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :1 real:1
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 7 ms.
[2024-05-26 22:24:03] [INFO ] After 163ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :1 real:1
[2024-05-26 22:24:03] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2024-05-26 22:24:03] [INFO ] After 19ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :1 sat :1
[2024-05-26 22:24:03] [INFO ] After 23ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :1 sat :1
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 4 ms.
[2024-05-26 22:24:03] [INFO ] After 66ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :1 sat :1
Fused 2 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Finished Parikh walk after 29 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=29 )
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 1 ms.
Support contains 2 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 26/26 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 50 edges and 30 vertex of which 15 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 15 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 15 places :
Also discarding 9 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 9 transitions
Drop transitions removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 15 transition count 9
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 14 transition count 9
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 14 transition count 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 13 transition count 8
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 12 transition count 7
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 11 transition count 7
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 10 transition count 6
Applied a total of 15 rules in 16 ms. Remains 10 /30 variables (removed 20) and now considering 6/26 (removed 20) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 6 rows 10 cols
[2024-05-26 22:24:03] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-26 22:24:03] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 33 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 50 ms. Remains : 10/30 places, 6/26 transitions.
Finished random walk after 18 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=18 )
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
[2024-05-26 22:24:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2024-05-26 22:24:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Domain [tsid(7), tsid(7)] of place n9 breaks symmetries in sort tsid
[2024-05-26 22:24:03] [INFO ] Unfolded HLPN to a Petri net with 270 places and 116 transitions 659 arcs in 10 ms.
[2024-05-26 22:24:03] [INFO ] Unfolded 12 HLPN properties in 1 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 188 out of 270 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 270/270 places, 116/116 transitions.
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 252 transition count 116
Applied a total of 18 rules in 6 ms. Remains 252 /270 variables (removed 18) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 252 cols
[2024-05-26 22:24:03] [INFO ] Computed 138 invariants in 10 ms
[2024-05-26 22:24:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 115 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 22:24:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 22:24:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 165 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 283 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-26 22:24:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 22:24:03] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 111 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 252/270 places, 116/116 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 402 ms. Remains : 252/270 places, 116/116 transitions.
Support contains 188 out of 252 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-26 22:24:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2024-05-26 22:24:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-05-26 22:24:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 116 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 984 resets, run finished after 446 ms. (steps per millisecond=22 ) properties (out of 20) seen :5
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 16 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 17 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 11 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 10 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 16 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 10 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 18 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 18 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 18 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 17 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 15 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 19 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 9 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 19 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 19 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 15 properties.
[2024-05-26 22:24:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 22:24:04] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 138 generalized place invariants in 19 ms returned sat
[2024-05-26 22:24:04] [INFO ] After 197ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:15
[2024-05-26 22:24:04] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 0 positive and 138 generalized place invariants in 22 ms returned sat
[2024-05-26 22:24:05] [INFO ] After 396ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :1 sat :14
[2024-05-26 22:24:05] [INFO ] After 696ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :1 sat :14
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 221 ms.
[2024-05-26 22:24:05] [INFO ] After 1109ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :1 sat :14
Fused 15 Parikh solutions to 13 different solutions.
Finished Parikh walk after 41 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 3 properties in 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=20 )
Parikh walk visited 13 properties in 17 ms.
Support contains 8 out of 252 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 252/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 733 edges and 252 vertex of which 46 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 206 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 206 places :
Also discarding 81 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 81 transitions
Drop transitions removed 16 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 16 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 7 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 39 transition count 19
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 1 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 39 transition count 11
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 13 places
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 18 transition count 11
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 1 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 18 transition count 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 16 transition count 10
Applied a total of 56 rules in 5 ms. Remains 16 /252 variables (removed 236) and now considering 10/116 (removed 106) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 5 ms. Remains : 16/252 places, 10/116 transitions.
Finished random walk after 68 steps, including 6 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=68 )
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
Computed a total of 252 stabilizing places and 116 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 252 transition count 116
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((G(p0)&&X(G(p1)))))'
Support contains 9 out of 252 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 252/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 733 edges and 252 vertex of which 244 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 8 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 8 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 242 transition count 112
Applied a total of 3 rules in 31 ms. Remains 242 /252 variables (removed 10) and now considering 112/116 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 112 rows 242 cols
[2024-05-26 22:24:06] [INFO ] Computed 132 invariants in 6 ms
[2024-05-26 22:24:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 164 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 22:24:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 22:24:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 214 ms returned [176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196]
Discarding 14 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 380 ms to find 14 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 228/252 places, 112/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 228 /228 variables (removed 0) and now considering 112/112 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 422 ms. Remains : 228/252 places, 112/116 transitions.
ANTLR Tool version 4.9.3 used for code generation does not match the current runtime version 4.7.2ANTLR Runtime version 4.9.3 used for parser compilation does not match the current runtime version 4.7.2ANTLR Tool version 4.9.3 used for code generation does not match the current runtime version 4.7.2ANTLR Runtime version 4.9.3 used for parser compilation does not match the current runtime version 4.7.2Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 244 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-01 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0, 1} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=p0, acceptance={1} source=0 dest: 1}, { cond=p0, acceptance={0, 1} source=0 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0, 1} source=1 dest: 0}, { cond=p0, acceptance={1} source=1 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), acceptance={0, 1} source=2 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={1} source=2 dest: 1}, { cond=p1, acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={0, 1} source=2 dest: 2}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(AND (OR (LT s0 1) (LT s176 1)) (OR (LT s0 1) (LT s177 1)) (OR (LT s0 1) (LT s178 1)) (OR (LT s0 1) (LT s179 1)) (OR (LT s0 1) (LT s180 1)) (OR (LT s0 ...], nbAcceptance=2, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, no-univ-branch, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null, null, null][true, true, true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 10238 reset in 337 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 10253 reset in 267 ms.
Computed a total of 228 stabilizing places and 112 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 228 transition count 112
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X p0), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p1), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1)), (F (G p0)), (F (G p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to conjunction of knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 11 factoid took 191 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 9 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-01 finished in 1609 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((X(X(F(p1)))&&p0)))'
Support contains 22 out of 252 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 252/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 252 /252 variables (removed 0) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 252 cols
[2024-05-26 22:24:07] [INFO ] Computed 138 invariants in 11 ms
[2024-05-26 22:24:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 146 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 22:24:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 22:24:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 184 ms returned [197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 340 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 245/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 245 /245 variables (removed 0) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 350 ms. Remains : 245/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 107 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-02 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 0}], [{ cond=p0, acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 1}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}]], initial=2, aps=[p1:(OR (AND (GEQ s0 1) (GEQ s222 1)) (AND (GEQ s0 1) (GEQ s223 1)) (AND (GEQ s0 1) (GEQ s224 1)) (AND (GEQ s0 1) (GEQ s218 1)) (AND (GEQ s0 1) (GEQ s219 1...], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null][false, false, false]]
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 10 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-02 finished in 480 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((p0&&G(p1)&&(F(p2) U p3))))'
Support contains 25 out of 252 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 252/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 252 /252 variables (removed 0) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 22:24:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 22:24:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 119 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 22:24:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 22:24:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 199 ms returned [197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 320 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 245/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 245 /245 variables (removed 0) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 324 ms. Remains : 245/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 222 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), true, (NOT p1), (NOT p2), (NOT p3)]
Running random walk in product with property : QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-03 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND p0 p1), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND p0 p1 (NOT p3) (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 4}, { cond=(AND p0 p1 (NOT p3)), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 5}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 2}, { cond=p1, acceptance={} source=3 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(NOT p2), acceptance={0} source=4 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p3) (NOT p2)), acceptance={0} source=5 dest: 4}, { cond=(NOT p3), acceptance={0} source=5 dest: 5}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(LT s240 1), p1:(AND (OR (LT s0 1) (LT s190 1)) (OR (LT s0 1) (LT s191 1)) (OR (LT s0 1) (LT s192 1)) (OR (LT s0 1) (LT s193 1)) (OR (LT s0 1) (LT s194...], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false, false]]
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 9 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-03 finished in 569 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((G(p1)||p0)))'
Support contains 64 out of 252 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 252/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 733 edges and 252 vertex of which 244 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 8 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 8 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 241 transition count 111
Applied a total of 5 rules in 11 ms. Remains 241 /252 variables (removed 11) and now considering 111/116 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 111 rows 241 cols
[2024-05-26 22:24:08] [INFO ] Computed 132 invariants in 10 ms
[2024-05-26 22:24:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 116 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 22:24:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 22:24:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 185 ms returned [176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 303 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 234/252 places, 111/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 234 /234 variables (removed 0) and now considering 111/111 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 325 ms. Remains : 234/252 places, 111/116 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 152 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-04 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(AND p1 (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}]], initial=0, aps=[p1:(AND (OR (LT s0 1) (LT s199 1)) (OR (LT s0 1) (LT s200 1)) (OR (LT s0 1) (LT s201 1)) (OR (LT s0 1) (LT s202 1)) (OR (LT s0 1) (LT s203 1)) (OR (LT s0 ...], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null][true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 10259 reset in 214 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 10247 reset in 230 ms.
Computed a total of 234 stabilizing places and 111 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 234 transition count 111
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 (NOT p0)), (F (G p1)), (F (G (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (AND p1 (NOT p0))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0)))))]
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 18 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 2 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-04 finished in 1034 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 252 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 252/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 733 edges and 252 vertex of which 25 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 227 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 227 places :
Also discarding 55 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 55 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 42 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 42 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 24 transition count 18
Applied a total of 43 rules in 3 ms. Remains 24 /252 variables (removed 228) and now considering 18/116 (removed 98) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 24 cols
[2024-05-26 22:24:09] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-26 22:24:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 22:24:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 22:24:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 66 ms returned [8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 117 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 17/252 places, 18/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 17 /17 variables (removed 0) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 122 ms. Remains : 17/252 places, 18/116 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 118 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-05 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(LT s15 1)], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-invariant, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null][true, true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 10325 reset in 120 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 10315 reset in 152 ms.
Computed a total of 17 stabilizing places and 18 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 17 transition count 18
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0)), (F (G p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 15 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-05 finished in 614 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((!p0||G(F(p1)))))'
Support contains 9 out of 252 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 252/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 252 /252 variables (removed 0) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 252 cols
[2024-05-26 22:24:10] [INFO ] Computed 138 invariants in 7 ms
[2024-05-26 22:24:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 153 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 22:24:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 22:24:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 197 ms returned [197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 357 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 245/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 245 /245 variables (removed 0) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 366 ms. Remains : 245/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 151 ms :[(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (AND p0 (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-06 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}, { cond=p0, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 2}, { cond=true, acceptance={} source=3 dest: 3}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(OR (AND (GEQ s0 1) (GEQ s222 1)) (AND (GEQ s0 1) (GEQ s223 1)) (AND (GEQ s0 1) (GEQ s224 1)) (AND (GEQ s0 1) (GEQ s218 1)) (AND (GEQ s0 1) (GEQ s219 1...], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 304 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 270 ms.
Computed a total of 245 stabilizing places and 116 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 245 transition count 116
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT p0)), true, (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 18 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-06 finished in 1198 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 7 out of 252 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 252/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 733 edges and 252 vertex of which 244 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 8 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 8 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 241 transition count 111
Applied a total of 5 rules in 15 ms. Remains 241 /252 variables (removed 11) and now considering 111/116 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 111 rows 241 cols
[2024-05-26 22:24:11] [INFO ] Computed 132 invariants in 5 ms
[2024-05-26 22:24:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 146 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 22:24:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 22:24:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 215 ms returned [176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196]
Discarding 14 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 364 ms to find 14 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 227/252 places, 111/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 227 /227 variables (removed 0) and now considering 111/111 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 385 ms. Remains : 227/252 places, 111/116 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 42 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-08 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=p0, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(AND (LT s220 1) (LT s221 1) (LT s222 1) (LT s223 1) (LT s218 1) (LT s219 1) (LT s224 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null][true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 10236 reset in 150 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 10243 reset in 155 ms.
Computed a total of 227 stabilizing places and 111 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 227 transition count 111
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0)), (F (G p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 19 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-08 finished in 837 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((p0||(!p1 U (p2||G(!p1))))))'
Support contains 65 out of 252 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 252/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 252 /252 variables (removed 0) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 252 cols
[2024-05-26 22:24:12] [INFO ] Computed 138 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-26 22:24:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 126 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 22:24:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 22:24:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 171 ms returned [197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 302 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 245/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 245 /245 variables (removed 0) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 308 ms. Remains : 245/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 115 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p2) p1), (AND (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-09 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p2) p1), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 2}]], initial=1, aps=[p2:(AND (NOT (OR (AND (GEQ s57 1) (GEQ s58 1) (GEQ s59 1) (GEQ s60 1) (GEQ s61 1) (GEQ s62 1) (GEQ s63 1) (GEQ s226 1)) (AND (GEQ s92 1) (GEQ s93 1) (GEQ ...], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, terminal, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 249 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 264 ms.
Computed a total of 245 stabilizing places and 116 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 245 transition count 116
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p2 (NOT p1) p0), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1))))), true, (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1)))), (F (G p2)), (F (G (NOT p1))), (F (G p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 21 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 6 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-09 finished in 1035 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((X((!p0 U X(!p1)))||G(p2)))'
Support contains 30 out of 252 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 252/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 252 /252 variables (removed 0) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 22:24:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 22:24:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 133 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 22:24:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 22:24:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 188 ms returned [197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 324 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 245/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 245 /245 variables (removed 0) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 328 ms. Remains : 245/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 304 ms :[(AND p1 (NOT p2)), (AND p1 (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p2) p1), p1, true, p1, p1, (AND p1 (NOT p2)), (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-10 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(AND p2 (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND p2 p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 5}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 6}], [{ cond=(AND p2 (NOT p0) p1), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND p2 p0 p1), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) p1), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 5}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) p0 p1), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 6}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p2) p1), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 4}, { cond=(AND p2 p1), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 8}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 5}, { cond=p0, acceptance={} source=3 dest: 6}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=4 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p0) p1), acceptance={0} source=5 dest: 5}, { cond=(AND p0 p1), acceptance={0} source=5 dest: 6}], [{ cond=p1, acceptance={} source=6 dest: 4}], [{ cond=p2, acceptance={} source=7 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p2), acceptance={} source=7 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(NOT p2), acceptance={} source=8 dest: 4}, { cond=p2, acceptance={} source=8 dest: 8}]], initial=7, aps=[p2:(OR (LT s162 1) (LT s163 1) (LT s164 1) (LT s165 1) (LT s166 1) (LT s167 1) (LT s168 1) (LT s241 1)), p0:(OR (AND (GEQ s169 1) (GEQ s204 1)) (AND (GEQ ...], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 9833 reset in 184 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 9834 reset in 191 ms.
Computed a total of 245 stabilizing places and 116 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 245 transition count 116
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p2 (NOT p0) p1), (X (AND p2 (NOT p0))), (X (NOT (AND p2 p0))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p0 p1)))), (X (X (AND p2 p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 p0 p1)))), (X (X (AND p2 (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X p1)), (F (G p2)), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 18 factoid took 751 ms. Reduced automaton from 9 states, 20 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 8 states, 14 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 286 ms :[true, (AND p1 (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p2) p1), p1, p1, (AND p1 (NOT p2)), (AND p1 (NOT p2))]
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 983 resets, run finished after 272 ms. (steps per millisecond=36 ) properties (out of 10) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 136 resets, run finished after 54 ms. (steps per millisecond=185 ) properties (out of 10) seen :4
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 173 resets, run finished after 52 ms. (steps per millisecond=192 ) properties (out of 6) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 171 resets, run finished after 49 ms. (steps per millisecond=204 ) properties (out of 6) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 172 resets, run finished after 42 ms. (steps per millisecond=238 ) properties (out of 6) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 179 resets, run finished after 46 ms. (steps per millisecond=217 ) properties (out of 6) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 108 resets, run finished after 31 ms. (steps per millisecond=322 ) properties (out of 6) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 108 resets, run finished after 31 ms. (steps per millisecond=322 ) properties (out of 6) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 6 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 245 cols
[2024-05-26 22:24:16] [INFO ] Computed 132 invariants in 16 ms
[2024-05-26 22:24:16] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 132 generalized place invariants in 16 ms returned sat
[2024-05-26 22:24:16] [INFO ] After 57ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :1 real:5
[2024-05-26 22:24:16] [INFO ] After 75ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :1 real:5
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 16 ms.
[2024-05-26 22:24:16] [INFO ] After 197ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:6
[2024-05-26 22:24:16] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 0 positive and 132 generalized place invariants in 18 ms returned sat
[2024-05-26 22:24:16] [INFO ] After 171ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :1 sat :5
[2024-05-26 22:24:16] [INFO ] After 323ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :1 sat :5
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 99 ms.
[2024-05-26 22:24:16] [INFO ] After 539ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :1 sat :5
Fused 6 Parikh solutions to 5 different solutions.
Finished Parikh walk after 35 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=35 )
Parikh walk visited 4 properties in 2 ms.
Support contains 8 out of 245 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 245/245 places, 116/116 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 677 edges and 245 vertex of which 237 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 8 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 8 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Drop transitions removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 237 transition count 108
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 235 transition count 108
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 14 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 235 transition count 94
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 221 transition count 94
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 220 transition count 93
Applied a total of 38 rules in 23 ms. Remains 220 /245 variables (removed 25) and now considering 93/116 (removed 23) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 24 ms. Remains : 220/245 places, 93/116 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 1125 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=555 ) properties (out of 1) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 114 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=1111 ) properties (out of 1) seen :0
Finished probabilistic random walk after 305 steps, run visited all 1 properties in 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=33 )
Probabilistic random walk after 305 steps, saw 284 distinct states, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=33 ) properties seen :1
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p2 (NOT p0) p1), (X (AND p2 (NOT p0))), (X (NOT (AND p2 p0))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p0 p1)))), (X (X (AND p2 p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 p0 p1)))), (X (X (AND p2 (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X p1)), (F (G p2)), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p2)), (F (AND p0 (NOT p2) p1)), (F (NOT (AND p2 p1))), (F (AND (NOT p2) p1)), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p2 p1))), (F (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1)), (F (AND p0 p2 p1)), (F (AND p0 p1)), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (F (NOT p1))]
Knowledge based reduction with 18 factoid took 2934 ms. Reduced automaton from 8 states, 14 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 8 states, 14 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 267 ms :[true, (AND p1 (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p2) p1), p1, p1, (AND p1 (NOT p2)), (AND p1 (NOT p2))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 286 ms :[true, (AND p1 (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p2) p1), p1, p1, (AND p1 (NOT p2)), (AND p1 (NOT p2))]
Support contains 30 out of 245 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 245/245 places, 116/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 245 /245 variables (removed 0) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 22:24:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 22:24:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 118 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 22:24:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 22:24:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 204 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 325 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-26 22:24:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 22:24:20] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 76 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 406 ms. Remains : 245/245 places, 116/116 transitions.
Computed a total of 245 stabilizing places and 116 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 245 transition count 116
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p2 p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p2 p1)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p2 p1))), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G p2)), (F (G p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 8 factoid took 245 ms. Reduced automaton from 8 states, 14 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 8 states, 14 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 263 ms :[true, (AND p1 (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p2) p1), p1, p1, (AND p1 (NOT p2)), (AND p1 (NOT p2))]
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 982 resets, run finished after 158 ms. (steps per millisecond=63 ) properties (out of 10) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 139 resets, run finished after 37 ms. (steps per millisecond=270 ) properties (out of 10) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 172 resets, run finished after 40 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 10) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 175 resets, run finished after 51 ms. (steps per millisecond=196 ) properties (out of 10) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 169 resets, run finished after 53 ms. (steps per millisecond=188 ) properties (out of 10) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 172 resets, run finished after 38 ms. (steps per millisecond=263 ) properties (out of 10) seen :4
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 175 resets, run finished after 32 ms. (steps per millisecond=312 ) properties (out of 6) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 107 resets, run finished after 25 ms. (steps per millisecond=400 ) properties (out of 6) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 109 resets, run finished after 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=434 ) properties (out of 6) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 6 properties.
[2024-05-26 22:24:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 22:24:22] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 132 generalized place invariants in 16 ms returned sat
[2024-05-26 22:24:22] [INFO ] After 54ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :1 real:5
[2024-05-26 22:24:22] [INFO ] After 76ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :1 real:5
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 13 ms.
[2024-05-26 22:24:22] [INFO ] After 189ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :1 real:5
[2024-05-26 22:24:22] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 0 positive and 132 generalized place invariants in 16 ms returned sat
[2024-05-26 22:24:22] [INFO ] After 195ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :1 sat :5
[2024-05-26 22:24:22] [INFO ] After 330ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :1 sat :5
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 99 ms.
[2024-05-26 22:24:22] [INFO ] After 524ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :1 sat :5
Fused 6 Parikh solutions to 5 different solutions.
Finished Parikh walk after 35 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=35 )
Parikh walk visited 4 properties in 3 ms.
Support contains 8 out of 245 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 245/245 places, 116/116 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 677 edges and 245 vertex of which 237 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 8 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 8 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Drop transitions removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 237 transition count 108
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 235 transition count 108
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 14 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 235 transition count 94
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 221 transition count 94
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 220 transition count 93
Applied a total of 38 rules in 22 ms. Remains 220 /245 variables (removed 25) and now considering 93/116 (removed 23) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 22 ms. Remains : 220/245 places, 93/116 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 1135 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=588 ) properties (out of 1) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 112 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=1250 ) properties (out of 1) seen :0
Finished probabilistic random walk after 305 steps, run visited all 1 properties in 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=61 )
Probabilistic random walk after 305 steps, saw 284 distinct states, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=61 ) properties seen :1
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p2 p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p2 p1)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p2 p1))), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G p2)), (F (G p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p2)), (F (AND p0 p1 (NOT p2))), (F (NOT (AND p1 p2))), (F (AND p1 (NOT p2))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 p2))), (F (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2))), (F (AND p0 p1 p2)), (F (AND p0 p1)), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (F (NOT p1))]
Knowledge based reduction with 8 factoid took 1011 ms. Reduced automaton from 8 states, 14 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 8 states, 14 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 261 ms :[true, (AND p1 (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p2) p1), p1, p1, (AND p1 (NOT p2)), (AND p1 (NOT p2))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 345 ms :[true, (AND p1 (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p2) p1), p1, p1, (AND p1 (NOT p2)), (AND p1 (NOT p2))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 268 ms :[true, (AND p1 (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p2) p1), p1, p1, (AND p1 (NOT p2)), (AND p1 (NOT p2))]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 9827 reset in 243 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 9839 reset in 242 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [true, false, true, true, false, true, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 288 ms :[true, (AND p1 (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p2) p1), p1, p1, (AND p1 (NOT p2)), (AND p1 (NOT p2))]
Support contains 30 out of 245 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 245/245 places, 116/116 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 677 edges and 245 vertex of which 237 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 8 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 8 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 237 transition count 115
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 2 rules in 23 ms. Remains 237 /245 variables (removed 8) and now considering 115/116 (removed 1) transitions.
[2024-05-26 22:24:25] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 16 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 115 rows 237 cols
[2024-05-26 22:24:25] [INFO ] Computed 126 invariants in 6 ms
[2024-05-26 22:24:25] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 86 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 237/245 places, 115/116 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 136 ms. Remains : 237/245 places, 115/116 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin16371168161360618978
[2024-05-26 22:24:25] [INFO ] Built C files in 5ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin16371168161360618978
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin16371168161360618978;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 337 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin16371168161360618978;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 43 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin16371168161360618978;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased3541532345839984404.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 1913 ms.
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-10 finished in 14552 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F((G(F((!p1||G(p2))))&&p0))))'
Support contains 9 out of 252 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 252/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 252 /252 variables (removed 0) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 252 cols
[2024-05-26 22:24:28] [INFO ] Computed 138 invariants in 7 ms
[2024-05-26 22:24:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 143 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 22:24:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 22:24:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 187 ms returned [197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 340 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 245/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 245 /245 variables (removed 0) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 348 ms. Remains : 245/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 162 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (AND p1 (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p0) (AND p1 (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p2) p1), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p2) p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-13 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) p1), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 4}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) p1), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=3 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(AND p2 p1), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 4}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) p1), acceptance={0} source=4 dest: 4}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(AND (OR (LT s0 1) (LT s197 1)) (OR (LT s0 1) (LT s198 1)) (OR (LT s0 1) (LT s199 1)) (OR (LT s0 1) (LT s200 1)) (OR (LT s0 1) (LT s201 1)) (OR (LT s0 ...], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-sensitive], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false]]
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 9 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06-LTLFireability-13 finished in 531 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 26921 ms.

BK_STOP 1716762269888

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202304061127.jar
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
+ VERSION=202304061127
+ echo 'Running Version 202304061127'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="gold2023"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool gold2023"
echo " Input is QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r329-tall-171662361300008"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06.tgz
mv QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-06 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;