Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r312-tall-171662339500865.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is ResAllocation-PT-R020C002, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r312-tall-171662339500865
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 576K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.0K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 100K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 60K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 23 07:48 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K Apr 23 07:48 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.4K Apr 23 07:48 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Apr 23 07:48 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.7K Apr 11 23:25 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 93K Apr 11 23:25 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Apr 11 23:24 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 96K Apr 11 23:24 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K Apr 23 07:48 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Apr 23 07:48 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 85K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R020C002-CTLCardinality-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R020C002-CTLCardinality-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R020C002-CTLCardinality-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R020C002-CTLCardinality-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R020C002-CTLCardinality-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R020C002-CTLCardinality-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R020C002-CTLCardinality-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R020C002-CTLCardinality-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R020C002-CTLCardinality-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R020C002-CTLCardinality-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R020C002-CTLCardinality-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R020C002-CTLCardinality-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R020C002-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R020C002-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R020C002-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R020C002-CTLCardinality-2023-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716718533264

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ResAllocation-PT-R020C002
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-26 10:15:34] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-26 10:15:34] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-26 10:15:34] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 71 ms
[2024-05-26 10:15:34] [INFO ] Transformed 80 places.
[2024-05-26 10:15:34] [INFO ] Transformed 42 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:15:34] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-26 10:15:34] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 80 places and 42 transitions and 200 arcs in 174 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 18 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R020C002-CTLCardinality-2024-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 65 out of 80 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 80/80 places, 42/42 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 80 /80 variables (removed 0) and now considering 42/42 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 42 rows 80 cols
[2024-05-26 10:15:34] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 9 ms
[2024-05-26 10:15:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 213 ms returned [51, 53, 65, 73]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 245 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 76/80 places, 42/42 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 76 /76 variables (removed 0) and now considering 42/42 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 276 ms. Remains : 76/80 places, 42/42 transitions.
Support contains 65 out of 76 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-26 10:15:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2024-05-26 10:15:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-26 10:15:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 42 transitions.
Support contains 64 out of 76 places (down from 65) after GAL structural reductions.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R020C002-CTLCardinality-2024-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 73 to 67
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (341 resets) in 1388 ms. (28 steps per ms) remains 17/67 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 43 ms. (90 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 33 ms. (117 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 25 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 29 ms. (133 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 35 ms. (111 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 71 ms. (55 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 49 ms. (80 steps per ms) remains 16/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 42 rows 76 cols
[2024-05-26 10:15:35] [INFO ] Computed 36 invariants in 2 ms
Problem AtomicPropp46 is UNSAT
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 6/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 28/55 variables, 20/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 28/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 4/59 variables, 3/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 4/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 40/99 variables, 59/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 19/118 variables, 17/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 17/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 7/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 15 unsolved
[2024-05-26 10:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/118 variables, 2/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/118 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 15 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 118/118 variables, and 190 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 15 unsolved in 701 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 76/76 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 36/36 constraints, State Equation: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 25/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 5/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 29/54 variables, 20/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 29/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 2/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 5/59 variables, 4/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 5/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 15 unsolved
[2024-05-26 10:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 17 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 40/99 variables, 59/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 6/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 19/118 variables, 17/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 17/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 7/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 9/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 15 unsolved
[2024-05-26 10:15:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:15:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:15:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 3/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/118 variables, 0/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 15 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 118/118 variables, and 209 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 15 unsolved in 822 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 76/76 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 36/36 constraints, State Equation: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 15/16 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 1586ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 15 unsolved
Fused 15 Parikh solutions to 12 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 11 properties in 2763 ms.
Support contains 14 out of 76 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 76/76 places, 42/42 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 76 transition count 41
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 74 transition count 41
Applied a total of 3 rules in 23 ms. Remains 74 /76 variables (removed 2) and now considering 41/42 (removed 1) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 23 ms. Remains : 74/76 places, 41/42 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (376 resets) in 493 ms. (80 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (72 resets) in 105 ms. (377 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (64 resets) in 110 ms. (360 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (80 resets) in 124 ms. (320 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (72 resets) in 105 ms. (377 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 748671 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=249 ) properties seen :0 out of 4
Probabilistic random walk after 748671 steps, saw 175085 distinct states, run finished after 3017 ms. (steps per millisecond=248 ) properties seen :0
// Phase 1: matrix 41 rows 74 cols
[2024-05-26 10:15:43] [INFO ] Computed 35 invariants in 2 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 2/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 15/29 variables, 11/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 15/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
[2024-05-26 10:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 9/38 variables, 6/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 9/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
[2024-05-26 10:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 1/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 30/68 variables, 38/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 41/109 variables, 30/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 30/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 12/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 1/110 variables, 1/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 1/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 1/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 1/111 variables, 1/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 1/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 1/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (OVERLAPS) 4/115 variables, 4/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 4/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 2/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (OVERLAPS) 0/115 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 115/115 variables, and 185 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 221 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 74/74 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 35/35 constraints, State Equation: 74/74 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 2/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 15/29 variables, 11/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 15/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 9/38 variables, 6/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 9/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 1/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 30/68 variables, 38/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 41/109 variables, 30/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 30/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 12/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 4/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
[2024-05-26 10:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 3/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 1/110 variables, 1/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 1/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 1/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 1/111 variables, 1/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 1/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 1/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (OVERLAPS) 4/115 variables, 4/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 4/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 2/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
[2024-05-26 10:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 31 (OVERLAPS) 0/115 variables, 1/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 33 (OVERLAPS) 0/115 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 115/115 variables, and 193 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 423 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 74/74 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 35/35 constraints, State Equation: 74/74 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 656ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Fused 4 Parikh solutions to 3 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 554 ms.
Support contains 14 out of 74 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 74/74 places, 41/41 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 14 ms. Remains 74 /74 variables (removed 0) and now considering 41/41 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 14 ms. Remains : 74/74 places, 41/41 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 74/74 places, 41/41 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 74 /74 variables (removed 0) and now considering 41/41 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:15:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 10:15:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned [41, 45, 47, 49, 57, 59, 64, 68, 71, 73]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 71 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 1 : 64/74 places, 41/41 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 64 /64 variables (removed 0) and now considering 41/41 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 2 iterations and 76 ms. Remains : 64/74 places, 41/41 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (380 resets) in 506 ms. (78 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (72 resets) in 91 ms. (434 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (64 resets) in 37 ms. (1052 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (80 resets) in 47 ms. (833 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (72 resets) in 33 ms. (1176 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 875138 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=291 ) properties seen :0 out of 4
Probabilistic random walk after 875138 steps, saw 201441 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=291 ) properties seen :0
// Phase 1: matrix 41 rows 64 cols
[2024-05-26 10:15:48] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 1 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 2/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 14/28 variables, 10/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 14/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 6/34 variables, 3/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 6/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 30/64 variables, 34/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 37/101 variables, 26/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 26/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 8/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 1/102 variables, 1/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 3/105 variables, 3/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 3/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 0/105 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 105/105 variables, and 153 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 118 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 64/64 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 2/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 14/28 variables, 10/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 14/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
[2024-05-26 10:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 6/34 variables, 3/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 6/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
[2024-05-26 10:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 1/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 30/64 variables, 34/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 37/101 variables, 26/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 26/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 8/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 4/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
[2024-05-26 10:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 1/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 1/102 variables, 1/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 3/105 variables, 3/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 3/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
[2024-05-26 10:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (OVERLAPS) 0/105 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 105/105 variables, and 161 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 393 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 64/64 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 518ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Fused 4 Parikh solutions to 3 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 667 ms.
Support contains 14 out of 64 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 64/64 places, 41/41 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 64 /64 variables (removed 0) and now considering 41/41 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 64/64 places, 41/41 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 64/64 places, 41/41 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 64 /64 variables (removed 0) and now considering 41/41 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:15:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 10:15:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 10:15:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 10:15:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 63 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 112 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-26 10:15:49] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 39 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:15:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 25/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
[2024-05-26 10:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 19/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 41/105 variables, 64/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/105 variables, 0/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 105/105 variables, and 172 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved in 989 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 64/64 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 39/39 constraints, Known Traps: 19/19 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 25/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 19/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 41/105 variables, 64/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 39/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/105 variables, 0/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 105/105 variables, and 211 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved in 826 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 64/64 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 39/39 constraints, Known Traps: 19/19 constraints]
After SMT, in 1826ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1827ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 1947 ms. Remains : 64/64 places, 41/41 transitions.
Attempting over-approximation, by ignoring read arcs.
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 64 transition count 40
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 63 transition count 40
Applied a total of 2 rules in 6 ms. Remains 63 /64 variables (removed 1) and now considering 40/41 (removed 1) transitions.
Running SMT prover for 4 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 40 rows 63 cols
[2024-05-26 10:15:51] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:15:51] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 25 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2024-05-26 10:15:51] [INFO ] After 55ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:4
[2024-05-26 10:15:51] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 25 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2024-05-26 10:15:51] [INFO ] After 33ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :4
TRAPS : Iteration 0
[2024-05-26 10:15:51] [INFO ] After 53ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :4
[2024-05-26 10:15:51] [INFO ] After 105ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :4
Over-approximation ignoring read arcs solved 0 properties in 183 ms.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 14 simplifications.
[2024-05-26 10:15:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-26 10:15:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-26 10:15:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 42 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 76/76 places, 42/42 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 76 /76 variables (removed 0) and now considering 42/42 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 42 rows 76 cols
[2024-05-26 10:15:51] [INFO ] Computed 36 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-26 10:15:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned [41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, 64, 66, 71, 73, 75]
Discarding 15 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 70 ms to find 15 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 61/76 places, 42/42 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 61 /61 variables (removed 0) and now considering 42/42 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 76 ms. Remains : 61/76 places, 42/42 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:15:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-26 10:15:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-26 10:15:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 42 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:15:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-26 10:15:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-26 10:15:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1866676709161934082.gal : 6 ms
[2024-05-26 10:15:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14150373069050456254.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1866676709161934082.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14150373069050456254.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.15343e+07,0.027043,4228,2,159,5,3778,6,0,289,4334,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!((EG(((p_0_14==0)||(r_0_19==1))) + AX((r_1_15==0)))) U (p_0_4==1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!((EG(((p_0_14==0)||(r_0_19==1))) + !(EX(!((r_1_15==0))))))) * (p_0_4==1))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t20, t21, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
(forward)formula 0,0,2.58855,101828,1,0,1928,577071,113,945,1879,736846,2276
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R020C002-CTLCardinality-2024-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 76/76 places, 42/42 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 76 /76 variables (removed 0) and now considering 42/42 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:15:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 10:15:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned [45, 47, 49, 55, 59, 64, 68, 71, 73, 75]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 61 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 66/76 places, 42/42 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 66 /66 variables (removed 0) and now considering 42/42 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 67 ms. Remains : 66/76 places, 42/42 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:15:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-26 10:15:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-26 10:15:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 42 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:15:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-26 10:15:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-26 10:15:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8287013389470020806.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:15:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1410225341838986201.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8287013389470020806.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1410225341838986201.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.15343e+07,0.020183,4328,2,173,5,3975,6,0,309,4566,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E(((EX((((p_0_14==0)||(p_0_4==1))||((r_1_14==0)||(p_1_18==1)))) + (EF((r_1_0==1)) * AX((p_1_1==1)))) + EX(!(AF(((p_0_9==0)||(r_1_1==1))...237
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,((EX((((p_0_14==0)||(p_0_4==1))||((r_1_14==0)||(p_1_18==1)))) + (E(TRUE U (r_1_0==1)) * !(EX(!((p_1_...358
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t20, t21, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
(forward)formula 0,0,1.48493,60900,1,0,2087,330026,130,1242,2112,472733,2584
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R020C002-CTLCardinality-2024-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 76/76 places, 42/42 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 76 /76 variables (removed 0) and now considering 42/42 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:15:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 10:15:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 72 ms returned [41, 45, 47, 57, 61, 64, 66, 68, 71, 73]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 72 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 66/76 places, 42/42 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 66 /66 variables (removed 0) and now considering 42/42 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 74 ms. Remains : 66/76 places, 42/42 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:15:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-26 10:15:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-26 10:15:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 42 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:15:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-26 10:15:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-26 10:15:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5642682651093747612.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:15:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality205900736845929334.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5642682651093747612.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality205900736845929334.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.15343e+07,0.019449,4332,2,173,5,4045,6,0,309,4583,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((E(!(AX(E((r_0_1==1) U ((r_0_15==0)||(p_1_18==1))))) U EX((p_0_8==1))) + EG((r_0_16==1))) + (EG(((r_1_19==1) + EX(!(E((r_0_12==1) U (p_1...361
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY(FwdU(Init,!(!(EX(!(E((r_0_1==1) U ((r_0_15==0)||(p_1_18==1))))))))) * (p_0_8==1))] != FALSE + [FwdG(Init,...512
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t20, t21, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 38/0/4
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,19.3519,602836,1,0,4573,3.59814e+06,149,2843,2215,4.38535e+06,4934
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R020C002-CTLCardinality-2024-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 76/76 places, 42/42 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 76 /76 variables (removed 0) and now considering 42/42 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:16:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 10:16:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 72 ms returned [41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, 64, 66, 71, 73, 75]
Discarding 15 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 73 ms to find 15 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 61/76 places, 42/42 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 61 /61 variables (removed 0) and now considering 42/42 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 76 ms. Remains : 61/76 places, 42/42 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:16:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-26 10:16:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-26 10:16:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 42 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:16:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:16:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:16:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1743140489591138089.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-26 10:16:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9821352531684982414.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1743140489591138089.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9821352531684982414.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.15343e+07,0.026584,4300,2,159,5,3778,6,0,289,4334,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((E(AG(((p_1_11==1)&&(r_1_15==0))) U !(EG((r_1_15==1)))) * EF(EG((p_0_1==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU((EY(Init) * E(!(E(TRUE U !(((p_1_11==1)&&(r_1_15==0))))) U !(EG((r_1_15==1))))),TRUE),(p_0_1==1))] !=...161
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t20, t21, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
(forward)formula 0,0,2.42853,89444,1,0,2974,499568,123,1477,1962,686468,3584
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R020C002-CTLCardinality-2024-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 76/76 places, 42/42 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 76 /76 variables (removed 0) and now considering 42/42 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:16:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 10:16:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned [41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, 64, 66, 68, 71, 73, 75]
Discarding 16 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 72 ms to find 16 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 60/76 places, 42/42 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 42/42 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 80 ms. Remains : 60/76 places, 42/42 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:16:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-26 10:16:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-26 10:16:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 42 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:16:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-26 10:16:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-26 10:16:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7744924840507377750.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:16:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10048153496434510069.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7744924840507377750.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10048153496434510069.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.15343e+07,0.02464,4296,2,156,5,3667,6,0,285,4211,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AF(EX((p_0_10==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(EX((p_0_10==0))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t20, t21, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
(forward)formula 0,0,0.143311,9840,1,0,102,41189,106,51,1849,39251,97
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R020C002-CTLCardinality-2024-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 76/76 places, 42/42 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 76 /76 variables (removed 0) and now considering 42/42 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:16:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 10:16:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 88 ms returned [41, 43, 45, 53, 55, 57, 61, 64, 66, 73, 75]
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 89 ms to find 11 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 65/76 places, 42/42 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 65 /65 variables (removed 0) and now considering 42/42 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 98 ms. Remains : 65/76 places, 42/42 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:16:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-26 10:16:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-26 10:16:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 42 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:16:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-26 10:16:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-26 10:16:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15132149862734752503.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:16:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1998442804293591331.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15132149862734752503.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1998442804293591331.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.15343e+07,0.01945,4316,2,171,5,4027,6,0,305,4618,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(AX(EF(!((((r_1_3==0)&&(r_1_17==0))&&(((p_1_4==0)||(r_0_11==0))||(r_0_15==1)))))) U (!(EF(EX((p_1_17==1)))) + (EX((!(((p_0_3==0)||(p_0_1...363
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(E(TRUE U EX((p_1_17==1)))) + (EX((!(((p_0_3==0)||(p_0_18==1))) * EX(((r_1_10==0)||(r_0_6==1)...1042
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t20, t21, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,10.2629,350440,1,0,2992,2.23638e+06,125,2001,2171,2.44539e+06,2818
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R020C002-CTLCardinality-2024-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 76/76 places, 42/42 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 76 /76 variables (removed 0) and now considering 42/42 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:16:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 10:16:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned [41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, 64, 66, 68, 71, 73, 75]
Discarding 16 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 67 ms to find 16 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 60/76 places, 42/42 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 42/42 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 74 ms. Remains : 60/76 places, 42/42 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:16:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-26 10:16:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-26 10:16:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 42 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:16:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:16:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-26 10:16:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16197540165226593458.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:16:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4424365184500166594.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16197540165226593458.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4424365184500166594.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.15343e+07,0.018508,4296,2,156,5,3667,6,0,285,4211,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(((AF(EG(((r_0_19==0)&&(p_0_12==1)))) + (p_0_11==0)) + (r_0_13==1))) * EX(TRUE))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((r_0_13==1))) * !((p_0_11==0))),!(EG(((r_0_19==0)&&(p_0_12==1)))))] = FALSE * [(Ini...181
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t20, t21, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
(forward)formula 0,0,0.947455,40472,1,0,1144,218658,114,751,1855,246677,1555
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R020C002-CTLCardinality-2024-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 76/76 places, 42/42 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 75 transition count 41
Applied a total of 2 rules in 6 ms. Remains 75 /76 variables (removed 1) and now considering 41/42 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 41 rows 75 cols
[2024-05-26 10:16:29] [INFO ] Computed 36 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:16:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned [40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60, 63, 67, 70, 72]
Discarding 14 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 67 ms to find 14 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 61/76 places, 41/42 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 61 /61 variables (removed 0) and now considering 41/41 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 75 ms. Remains : 61/76 places, 41/42 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:16:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:16:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-26 10:16:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 41 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:16:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:16:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:16:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12710006117283284621.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:16:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17851463848204910851.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12710006117283284621.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17851463848204910851.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.101e+07,0.026631,4300,2,156,5,3804,6,0,288,4364,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AG((EF((p_0_16==1)) * (AG((r_1_19==0)) + (((r_1_14==0)&&(p_0_9==1))&&((r_0_15==0)&&(p_1_0==1)))))) * ((p_0_15==0)||(p_0_10==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((p_0_15==0)||(p_0_10==1))) * !(E(TRUE U !((E(TRUE U (p_0_16==1)) * (!(E(TRUE U !((r_1_19==...233
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t19, t40, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
(forward)formula 0,1,0.104239,7996,1,0,171,24139,107,89,1880,25506,192
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R020C002-CTLCardinality-2024-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 76/76 places, 42/42 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 76 /76 variables (removed 0) and now considering 42/42 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 42 rows 76 cols
[2024-05-26 10:16:30] [INFO ] Computed 36 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:16:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned [41, 47, 49, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, 64, 66, 68, 71]
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 67 ms to find 12 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 64/76 places, 42/42 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 64 /64 variables (removed 0) and now considering 42/42 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 69 ms. Remains : 64/76 places, 42/42 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:16:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-26 10:16:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-26 10:16:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 42 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:16:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:16:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-26 10:16:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4784112744728856816.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:16:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7666289389660985468.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4784112744728856816.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7666289389660985468.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.15343e+07,0.022023,4312,2,167,5,3970,6,0,301,4505,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!((A(A((p_1_1==0) U ((r_1_19==1)&&((r_1_1==0)||(p_1_9==1)))) U A((r_1_18!=0) U A((p_0_13==0) U (r_0_11==1)))) * (!(A((((r_0_3==0)||(p_1...275
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(EX(!(FALSE))))))) * !(E(!(!(EX(!(FALSE)))) U (!(!((!((E(!(!((E(!(!((E(!((r_0_11==1)) U (!((p_...1439
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t20, t21, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,18.722,575424,1,0,8810,3.4648e+06,152,5690,2152,4.21094e+06,10908
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R020C002-CTLCardinality-2024-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 76/76 places, 42/42 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 76 /76 variables (removed 0) and now considering 42/42 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:16:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 10:16:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned [41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 53, 55, 57, 59, 66, 71, 73, 75]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 51 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/76 places, 42/42 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 63 /63 variables (removed 0) and now considering 42/42 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 54 ms. Remains : 63/76 places, 42/42 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:16:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-26 10:16:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:16:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 42 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:16:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:16:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-26 10:16:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5794345139078864581.gal : 16 ms
[2024-05-26 10:16:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16316009392149886517.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5794345139078864581.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16316009392149886517.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.15343e+07,0.031829,4312,2,165,5,3958,6,0,297,4532,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((EX(!(A(((p_0_14==0)||(r_1_11==1)) U (r_0_19==1)))) * (p_0_17==1)) * E(((p_0_8==0)||(r_0_4==1)) U !(A(A(((p_1_1==0)||(p_1_13==1)) U (...199
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((EX(!(!((E(!((r_0_19==1)) U (!(((p_0_14==0)||(r_1_11==1))) * !((r_0_19==1)))) + EG(!((r_0_19==1)))...425
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t20, t21, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
(forward)formula 0,0,7.19417,269520,1,0,8181,1.62594e+06,136,4143,1957,2.08968e+06,9601
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R020C002-CTLCardinality-2024-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 76/76 places, 42/42 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 76 /76 variables (removed 0) and now considering 42/42 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:16:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 10:16:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 104 ms returned [41, 43, 45, 47, 53, 55, 57, 59, 64, 66, 68, 71, 73]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 105 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/76 places, 42/42 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 63 /63 variables (removed 0) and now considering 42/42 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 107 ms. Remains : 63/76 places, 42/42 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:16:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2024-05-26 10:16:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:16:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 42 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:16:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:16:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:16:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12337401839788091667.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:16:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10020594941290252002.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12337401839788091667.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10020594941290252002.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.15343e+07,0.021222,4312,2,164,5,3922,6,0,297,4454,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(!((EG((r_0_3!=0)) + ((r_1_11!=0) * !(AF(((r_1_19==0)||(p_0_11==1))))))) U (!(EG(!(AG((r_0_16==0))))) + AX(!(EF((r_1_4==0)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(EY(((FwdU(Init,!((!(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((r_0_16==0))))))) + !(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U (r_1_4==0))))))))) * !(!((EG...408
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t20, t21, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,7.79543,269304,1,0,3823,1.63441e+06,131,2137,2094,1.84416e+06,4764
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R020C002-CTLCardinality-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 76/76 places, 42/42 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 73 transition count 40
Applied a total of 5 rules in 3 ms. Remains 73 /76 variables (removed 3) and now considering 40/42 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 40 rows 73 cols
[2024-05-26 10:17:04] [INFO ] Computed 35 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-26 10:17:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 114 ms returned [40, 42, 46, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 61, 63, 65, 68, 70, 72]
Discarding 14 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 117 ms to find 14 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 59/76 places, 40/42 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 40/40 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 126 ms. Remains : 59/76 places, 40/42 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:17:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:17:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:17:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 40 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:17:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:17:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:17:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7056443536628951744.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:17:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17755740943135456764.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7056443536628951744.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17755740943135456764.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.04858e+07,0.023349,4020,2,149,5,3279,6,0,279,3758,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((r_1_3==1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(r_1_3==1))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 38/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,0.04296,4812,1,0,10,7891,19,4,1492,5421,8
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R020C002-CTLCardinality-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 76/76 places, 42/42 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 73 transition count 40
Applied a total of 5 rules in 3 ms. Remains 73 /76 variables (removed 3) and now considering 40/42 (removed 2) transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:17:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 10:17:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned [40, 42, 44, 46, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 61, 63, 65, 68, 70, 72]
Discarding 15 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 65 ms to find 15 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 58/76 places, 40/42 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 58 /58 variables (removed 0) and now considering 40/40 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 70 ms. Remains : 58/76 places, 40/42 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:17:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:17:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:17:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 40 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:17:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:17:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:17:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2089951666640982758.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:17:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15886250600178683676.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2089951666640982758.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15886250600178683676.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.04858e+07,0.016684,4016,2,146,5,3259,6,0,275,3739,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((p_1_3==1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((p_1_3==1)))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 38/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,0.035167,4808,1,0,10,7837,20,4,1489,5381,8
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R020C002-CTLCardinality-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 76/76 places, 42/42 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 76 /76 variables (removed 0) and now considering 42/42 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 42 rows 76 cols
[2024-05-26 10:17:04] [INFO ] Computed 36 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-26 10:17:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned [41, 43, 45, 47, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, 64, 68, 73, 75]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 62 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/76 places, 42/42 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 63 /63 variables (removed 0) and now considering 42/42 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 63 ms. Remains : 63/76 places, 42/42 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:17:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-26 10:17:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:17:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 42 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:17:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-26 10:17:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:17:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2657900743373507251.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-26 10:17:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11210645915413947522.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2657900743373507251.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11210645915413947522.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.15343e+07,0.026347,4308,2,165,5,3930,6,0,297,4500,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AG(((EF((p_0_2==0)) + EX(TRUE)) + (r_0_5==1))) + AX((((AX((p_0_5==1)) * (AF((p_0_6==0)) + EX((p_0_7==1)))) * (((r_1_17==0)||(r_0_14==1)...408
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (((([(FwdU((FwdU(((Init * !((!(E(TRUE U !(((E(TRUE U (p_0_2==0)) + EX(TRUE)) + (r_0_5==1))))) + !(EX(!((((!(EX(!...1754
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t20, t21, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,8.55553,248604,1,0,3044,1.53287e+06,136,1684,2184,1.63585e+06,3576
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R020C002-CTLCardinality-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2024-05-26 10:17:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-26 10:17:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Total runtime 99083 ms.

BK_STOP 1716718633484

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ResAllocation-PT-R020C002"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ResAllocation-PT-R020C002, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r312-tall-171662339500865"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ResAllocation-PT-R020C002.tgz
mv ResAllocation-PT-R020C002 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;