Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r312-tall-171662339500860.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is ResAllocation-PT-R015C002, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r312-tall-171662339500860
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 564K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.1K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 74K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 60K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K Apr 23 07:48 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K Apr 23 07:48 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.4K Apr 23 07:48 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Apr 23 07:48 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K Apr 11 23:32 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 142K Apr 11 23:32 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.9K Apr 11 23:30 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 84K Apr 11 23:30 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K Apr 23 07:48 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Apr 23 07:48 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 64K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716718492178

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ResAllocation-PT-R015C002
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-26 10:14:53] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-26 10:14:53] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-26 10:14:53] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 59 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:53] [INFO ] Transformed 60 places.
[2024-05-26 10:14:53] [INFO ] Transformed 32 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:53] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-26 10:14:53] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 60 places and 32 transitions and 150 arcs in 150 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 11 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Support contains 45 out of 60 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 60/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 60 cols
[2024-05-26 10:14:53] [INFO ] Computed 30 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 184 ms returned [31, 33, 35, 45, 53]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 213 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 55/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 55 /55 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 239 ms. Remains : 55/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
Support contains 45 out of 55 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 28 to 26
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (582 resets) in 1263 ms. (31 steps per ms) remains 4/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (130 resets) in 169 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (64 resets) in 151 ms. (263 steps per ms) remains 2/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (130 resets) in 99 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 55 cols
[2024-05-26 10:14:54] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 6 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/6 variables, 2/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 4/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/7 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 8/15 variables, 7/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 11/26 variables, 7/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 7/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 3/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 11/37 variables, 7/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 7/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 3/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 11/48 variables, 7/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 7/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 3/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 12/60 variables, 8/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 8/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 4/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (OVERLAPS) 12/72 variables, 8/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 8/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 4/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (OVERLAPS) 12/84 variables, 8/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 8/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 4/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 33 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 34 (OVERLAPS) 3/87 variables, 3/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 35 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 3/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 36 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 1/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 37 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 0/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 38 (OVERLAPS) 0/87 variables, 0/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 87/87 variables, and 135 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 188 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 55/55 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 55/55 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/6 variables, 2/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 4/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/7 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 8/15 variables, 7/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 11/26 variables, 7/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 7/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 3/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 2/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 11/37 variables, 7/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 7/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 3/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 11/48 variables, 7/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 7/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 3/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 12/60 variables, 8/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 8/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 4/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (OVERLAPS) 12/72 variables, 8/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 8/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 4/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (OVERLAPS) 12/84 variables, 8/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 8/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 33 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 4/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 34 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 35 (OVERLAPS) 3/87 variables, 3/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 36 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 3/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 37 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 1/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 38 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 39 (OVERLAPS) 0/87 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 87/87 variables, and 137 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 134 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 55/55 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 55/55 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 358ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Fused 2 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Finished Parikh walk after 815 steps, including 49 resets, run visited all 2 properties in 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=271 )
Parikh walk visited 2 properties in 8 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((p0 U p1)||(X(X(!p2)) U ((X(X(!p2))&&G(!p3))||X(X(G(!p2)))))))'
Support contains 10 out of 55 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 55/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 55 /55 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 10:14:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 77 ms returned [34, 36, 38, 45, 47, 52, 54]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 78 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 48/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 48 /48 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 80 ms. Remains : 48/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 814 ms :[p2, (AND (NOT p1) p2), p2, (AND p2 p3), (AND p2 p3), p2, (AND (NOT p1) p2), (AND (NOT p1) p2 p3), (AND (NOT p1) p2 p3), (AND (NOT p1) p2), true, (AND p2 p3), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) p2 p3), (AND (NOT p2) p3), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p3)]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-00
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 50183 steps with 12480 reset in 217 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-00 finished in 1183 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((p0&&X((G(p2)&&p1)))))'
Support contains 6 out of 55 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 55/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 55 /55 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 10:14:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned [34, 36, 38, 40, 43, 45, 50, 52]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 58 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 47/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 47 /47 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 68 ms. Remains : 47/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 181 ms :[true, (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (NOT p2), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-01
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 2 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-01 finished in 268 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 3 out of 55 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 55/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 53 transition count 30
Applied a total of 4 rules in 15 ms. Remains 53 /55 variables (removed 2) and now considering 30/32 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 30 rows 53 cols
[2024-05-26 10:14:56] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned [34, 36, 38, 41, 43, 45, 48, 50, 52]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 57 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 44/55 places, 30/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 44 /44 variables (removed 0) and now considering 30/30 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 75 ms. Remains : 44/55 places, 30/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 29 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-02
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 66 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-02 finished in 114 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(p0)&&F(G((p0 U p1))))))'
Support contains 4 out of 55 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 55/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 54 transition count 31
Applied a total of 2 rules in 4 ms. Remains 54 /55 variables (removed 1) and now considering 31/32 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 31 rows 54 cols
[2024-05-26 10:14:57] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned [33, 35, 39, 42, 44, 46, 49, 51, 53]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 59 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/55 places, 31/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 31/31 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 65 ms. Remains : 45/55 places, 31/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 178 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-03
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 66 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-03 finished in 256 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G(p0)))'
Support contains 4 out of 55 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 55/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 55 /55 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 55 cols
[2024-05-26 10:14:57] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned [34, 36, 38, 40, 43, 45, 47, 50, 52, 54]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 67 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 70 ms. Remains : 45/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 71 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-05
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-05 finished in 156 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(X(X(G(p0))))))'
Support contains 1 out of 55 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 55/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 55 /55 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 10:14:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned [34, 36, 38, 40, 43, 45, 47, 50, 52, 54]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 52 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 56 ms. Remains : 45/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 186 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-06
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 4 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-06 finished in 261 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 55 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 55/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 55 /55 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 10:14:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned [34, 36, 38, 40, 43, 45, 47, 50, 52, 54]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 52 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 55 ms. Remains : 45/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 76 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-07
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 127 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 146 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 20 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-07 finished in 477 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((G(p0)||(X(G(p2))&&p1))))'
Support contains 6 out of 55 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 55/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 54 transition count 31
Applied a total of 2 rules in 6 ms. Remains 54 /55 variables (removed 1) and now considering 31/32 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 31 rows 54 cols
[2024-05-26 10:14:58] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned [33, 35, 37, 39, 42, 44, 46, 49, 51]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 49 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/55 places, 31/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 31/31 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 56 ms. Remains : 45/55 places, 31/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 82 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-08
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 70 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-08 finished in 154 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((F(G(p0)) U (X(G(p2))&&p1)))'
Support contains 7 out of 55 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 55/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 55 /55 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 55 cols
[2024-05-26 10:14:58] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned [34, 38, 40, 43, 45, 47, 50, 54]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 55 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 47/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 47 /47 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 58 ms. Remains : 47/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 122 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p0), (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-09
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 70 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-09 finished in 197 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G(F((p0&&X(X(p0)))))&&(!p1 U (p2||G(!p1)))))'
Support contains 7 out of 55 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 55/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 55 /55 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 10:14:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned [36, 38, 40, 43, 45, 47, 50, 52, 54]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 54 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 46/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 56 ms. Remains : 46/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 277 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (AND p1 (NOT p2))), true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p2) p1), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-10
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 24890 reset in 153 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25006 reset in 180 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p2 (NOT p1) p0), (X p2), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1))), (X p0), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 11 factoid took 180 ms. Reduced automaton from 8 states, 17 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 9 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 185 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 32240 steps (471 resets) in 178 ms. (180 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p2 (NOT p1) p0), (X p2), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1))), (X p0), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 11 factoid took 159 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 9 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 9 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 192 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 310 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Support contains 2 out of 46 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 46 cols
[2024-05-26 10:15:00] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:15:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 10:15:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 10:15:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 43 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 91 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 30 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:15:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 16/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
[2024-05-26 10:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 43 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 60 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 37 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 15/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 32/78 variables, 46/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/78 variables, 0/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 78/78 variables, and 123 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved in 1150 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 46/46 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 16/16 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 16/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 15/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 32/78 variables, 46/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 30/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/78 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 78/78 variables, and 153 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved in 768 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 46/46 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 16/16 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints]
After SMT, in 1942ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1943ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2037 ms. Remains : 46/46 places, 32/32 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 85 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 9 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 9 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 169 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (586 resets) in 94 ms. (421 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 462 steps (0 resets) in 5 ms. (77 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 104 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 9 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 9 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 178 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 162 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 168 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 24978 reset in 104 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25093 reset in 119 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin6445412975333921065
[2024-05-26 10:15:03] [INFO ] Built C files in 11ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin6445412975333921065
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin6445412975333921065;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 256 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin6445412975333921065;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 51 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin6445412975333921065;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased8751441831437931160.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 3243 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-10 finished in 8822 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((F(p0)||G(p1)))'
Support contains 9 out of 55 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 55/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 53 transition count 30
Applied a total of 4 rules in 6 ms. Remains 53 /55 variables (removed 2) and now considering 30/32 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 30 rows 53 cols
[2024-05-26 10:15:07] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:15:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned [32, 34, 36, 41, 43, 45, 48, 50, 52]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 81 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 44/55 places, 30/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 44 /44 variables (removed 0) and now considering 30/30 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 88 ms. Remains : 44/55 places, 30/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 87 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-11
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 76 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-11 finished in 193 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(F(p0))))'
Support contains 2 out of 55 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 55/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 55 /55 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 55 cols
[2024-05-26 10:15:07] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:15:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned [34, 36, 38, 40, 43, 45, 47, 50, 52, 54]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 58 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 60 ms. Remains : 45/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 108 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-12
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 64 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-12 finished in 196 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((G(p0) U p1)||X(G(p2))))'
Support contains 8 out of 55 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 55/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 55 /55 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:15:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 10:15:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned [34, 36, 38, 40, 43, 47, 52]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 52 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 48/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 48 /48 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 54 ms. Remains : 48/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 262 ms :[true, (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-13
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-13 finished in 333 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(p0)&&F(G(p1)))))'
Support contains 5 out of 55 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 55/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 54 transition count 31
Applied a total of 2 rules in 4 ms. Remains 54 /55 variables (removed 1) and now considering 31/32 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 31 rows 54 cols
[2024-05-26 10:15:08] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-26 10:15:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned [33, 35, 37, 39, 42, 44, 46, 49, 51, 53]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 73 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 44/55 places, 31/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 44 /44 variables (removed 0) and now considering 31/31 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 79 ms. Remains : 44/55 places, 31/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 93 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-14
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 64 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-14 finished in 186 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 55 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 55/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 55 /55 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 55 cols
[2024-05-26 10:15:08] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-26 10:15:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned [34, 36, 38, 40, 43, 45, 47, 50, 52, 54]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 59 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 61 ms. Remains : 45/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 72 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-15
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 91 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 103 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 18 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-15 finished in 364 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 15274 ms.

BK_STOP 1716718508712

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ResAllocation-PT-R015C002"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ResAllocation-PT-R015C002, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r312-tall-171662339500860"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ResAllocation-PT-R015C002.tgz
mv ResAllocation-PT-R015C002 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;