Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r312-tall-171662339500858.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is ResAllocation-PT-R015C002, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r312-tall-171662339500858
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 564K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.1K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 74K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 60K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K Apr 23 07:48 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K Apr 23 07:48 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.4K Apr 23 07:48 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Apr 23 07:48 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K Apr 11 23:32 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 142K Apr 11 23:32 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.9K Apr 11 23:30 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 84K Apr 11 23:30 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K Apr 23 07:48 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Apr 23 07:48 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 64K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2023-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716718455251

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ResAllocation-PT-R015C002
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-26 10:14:16] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-26 10:14:16] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-26 10:14:16] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 69 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:16] [INFO ] Transformed 60 places.
[2024-05-26 10:14:16] [INFO ] Transformed 32 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:16] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-26 10:14:16] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 60 places and 32 transitions and 150 arcs in 163 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 14 ms.
Support contains 60 out of 60 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 60/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 60 cols
[2024-05-26 10:14:16] [INFO ] Computed 30 invariants in 9 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 164 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 10:14:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 10:14:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 77 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 269 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 30 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 59/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 29/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
[2024-05-26 10:14:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 53 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:14:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:14:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:14:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:14:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:14:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:14:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:14:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:14:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:14:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:14:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:14:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:14:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:14:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 14/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 1/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/92 variables, 60/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/92 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 92/92 variables, and 164 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved in 1071 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 60/60 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 30/30 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 59/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 29/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 14/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 1/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/92 variables, 60/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 30/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/92 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 92/92 variables, and 194 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved in 574 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 60/60 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 30/30 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints]
After SMT, in 1689ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1704ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2003 ms. Remains : 60/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
Support contains 60 out of 60 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 67 to 54
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (582 resets) in 1632 ms. (24 steps per ms) remains 9/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (149 resets) in 143 ms. (277 steps per ms) remains 8/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (131 resets) in 108 ms. (367 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (130 resets) in 105 ms. (377 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (64 resets) in 77 ms. (512 steps per ms) remains 7/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (125 resets) in 108 ms. (366 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (130 resets) in 155 ms. (256 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (64 resets) in 71 ms. (555 steps per ms) remains 5/7 properties
[2024-05-26 10:14:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp17 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp62 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 17/32 variables, 14/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 17/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
[2024-05-26 10:14:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 1/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 4/36 variables, 4/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 4/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 22/58 variables, 36/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 12/70 variables, 8/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 8/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 4/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 12/82 variables, 8/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 8/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 4/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 10/92 variables, 8/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 8/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 4/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 0/92 variables, 0/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 92/92 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved in 134 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 60/60 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 30/30 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 13/21 variables, 9/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 13/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 3/24 variables, 3/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 3/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 18/42 variables, 24/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 16/58 variables, 12/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 12/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 6/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 2/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 12/70 variables, 8/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 8/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 4/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 12/82 variables, 8/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 8/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 4/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (OVERLAPS) 10/92 variables, 8/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 8/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 4/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (OVERLAPS) 0/92 variables, 0/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 92/92 variables, and 154 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved in 142 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 60/60 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 30/30 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/5 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 283ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
Fused 3 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 2 properties in 38 ms.
Support contains 7 out of 60 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 60/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 59 transition count 31
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 59 transition count 30
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 56 transition count 30
Applied a total of 6 rules in 37 ms. Remains 56 /60 variables (removed 4) and now considering 30/32 (removed 2) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 37 ms. Remains : 56/60 places, 30/32 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (656 resets) in 846 ms. (47 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (161 resets) in 475 ms. (84 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Probably explored full state space saw : 131070 states, properties seen :0
Probabilistic random walk after 696309 steps, saw 131070 distinct states, run finished after 718 ms. (steps per millisecond=969 ) properties seen :0
Explored full state space saw : 131072 states, properties seen :0
Exhaustive walk after 696320 steps, saw 131072 distinct states, run finished after 589 ms. (steps per millisecond=1182 ) properties seen :0
Successfully simplified 3 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2024-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2024-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-26 10:14:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 60/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 10:14:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned [31, 37, 45, 47, 51]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 56 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 55/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 55 /55 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 58 ms. Remains : 55/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5267252556669151017.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9261547145006944364.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5267252556669151017.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9261547145006944364.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,278528,0.026034,3916,2,145,5,2699,6,0,255,2989,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF((AX(((p_0_0==0)||(r_0_1==0))) * EF(AG((((r_0_11==0)||(r_1_11==0))||(p_1_12==0)))))) * (E(((!(AG(AX((((r_0_9==1)&&(r_1_9==1))&&(p_1_10...879
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!((!(EX(!(((p_0_0==0)||(r_0_1==0))))) * E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !((((r_0_11==0)||(r_1_11==0))||(p_1_12==...1235
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t15, t16, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,1.99827,74664,1,0,2815,436332,130,1879,1864,506327,3622
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2024-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 60/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 10:14:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned [31, 33, 35, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59]
Discarding 14 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 58 ms to find 14 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 46/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 61 ms. Remains : 46/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3455773016414142329.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10611863242086104605.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3455773016414142329.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10611863242086104605.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,278528,0.011515,3920,2,119,5,2136,6,0,219,2398,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((AX(AG(((p_0_6==0)||(r_0_7==0)))) + AX(AX(EG((((r_0_3==0)||(r_1_3==0))||(p_1_4==0)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((p_0_6==0)||(r_0_7==0)))))))))] != FALSE + [(EY(Init) * !(EX(!(!(EX(!(EG((((r...208
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t15, t16, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
(forward)formula 0,1,0.800671,34336,1,0,1208,187249,93,565,1477,233548,1381
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2024-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 60/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 10:14:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned [31, 33, 35, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 59]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 49 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 47/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 47 /47 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 51 ms. Remains : 47/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3970464259975544018.gal : 6 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3984036464197535640.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3970464259975544018.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3984036464197535640.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,278528,0.011978,3924,2,122,5,2233,6,0,223,2505,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(E(!((!(E((((r_0_13==1)&&(r_1_13==1))&&(p_1_14==1)) U ((p_0_5==1)&&(r_0_6==1)))) * !((((!((p_0_5==1)&&(r_0_6==1)))||((p_0_6==1)&&(r_0_7...260
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(EY(Init),!((!(E((((r_0_13==1)&&(r_1_13==1))&&(p_1_14==1)) U ((p_0_5==1)&&(r_0_6==1)))) * !((((!((p_0_5==...315
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t15, t16, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
(forward)formula 0,0,0.029077,4452,1,0,77,7008,86,35,1442,4426,74
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2024-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 60/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 10:14:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned [31, 41, 45, 47, 51, 53]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 57 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 54/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 59 ms. Remains : 54/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10414607720675402695.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15123612610064670846.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10414607720675402695.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15123612610064670846.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,278528,0.013435,3968,2,142,5,2610,6,0,251,2882,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(E(((A(AX((((r_0_3==1)&&(r_1_3==1))&&(p_1_4==1))) U (((r_0_6==1)&&(r_1_6==1))&&(p_1_7==1))) + EF(((p_0_14==1)||((r_0_14==1)&&(r_1_14==1)...810
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,E(((!((E(!((((r_0_6==1)&&(r_1_6==1))&&(p_1_7==1))) U (!(!(EX(!((((r_0_3==1)&&(r_1_3==1))&&(p_1_4==1)...1175
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t15, t16, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
(forward)formula 0,0,1.35244,53680,1,0,1583,306327,102,799,1707,381521,1880
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2024-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 60/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 10:14:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned [31, 33, 35, 37, 41, 43, 45, 49, 51, 57, 59]
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 63 ms to find 11 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 49/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 49 /49 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 67 ms. Remains : 49/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8548755352994270759.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10227764188454468586.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8548755352994270759.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10227764188454468586.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,278528,0.012732,3944,2,128,5,2381,6,0,231,2663,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(((A(A((((r_0_4==1)&&(r_1_4==1))&&(p_1_5==1)) U (((r_0_11==1)&&(r_1_11==1))&&(p_1_12==1))) U AX((((r_0_8==1)&&(r_1_8==1))&&(p_1_9==1))...237
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(E(TRUE U ((!((E(!(!(EX(!((((r_0_8==1)&&(r_1_8==1))&&(p_1_9==1)))))) U (!(!((E(!((((r_0_11==1)&&...542
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t15, t16, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,2.48879,94696,1,0,2230,547413,107,1184,1643,650551,2637
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2024-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 60/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 10:14:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 100 ms returned [31, 35, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 55, 57, 59]
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 110 ms to find 12 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 48/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 48 /48 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 115 ms. Remains : 48/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5722541750757987351.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15344903639575108362.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5722541750757987351.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15344903639575108362.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,278528,0.024685,3928,2,125,5,2232,6,0,227,2500,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(A(AG((AG((((r_0_3==1)&&(r_1_3==1))&&(p_1_4==1))) + AX((((r_0_11==1)&&(r_1_11==1))&&(p_1_12==1))))) U !(EG(!((((r_0_1==1)&&(r_1_1==1))&...172
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(!(EG(!((((r_0_1==1)&&(r_1_1==1))&&(p_1_2==1))))))))) * !(E(!(!(EG(!((((r_0_1==1)&&(r_1_1==1...375
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t15, t16, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,1.46104,56592,1,0,1143,328931,102,734,1603,379691,1502
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2024-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 60/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 10:14:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned [33, 35, 37, 41, 43, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59]
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 59 ms to find 12 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 48/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 48 /48 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 63 ms. Remains : 48/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11660024918240056150.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13800750698908342012.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11660024918240056150.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13800750698908342012.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,278528,0.018398,3928,2,124,5,2208,6,0,227,2469,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((!(E(!(((((r_0_7==1)&&(r_1_7==1))&&(p_1_8==1))||(!((p_0_6==1)&&(r_0_7==1))))) U E(!((((r_0_4==1)&&(r_1_4==1))&&(p_1_5==1))) U (((p_0_9...289
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(!(((((r_0_7==1)&&(r_1_7==1))&&(p_1_8==1))||(!((p_0_6==1)&&(r_0_7==1))))) U E(!((((r_0_4...359
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t15, t16, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,1.21313,50544,1,0,1186,279686,106,855,1617,337894,1314
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2024-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 60/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 10:14:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned [31, 33, 35, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57]
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 51 ms to find 12 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 48/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 48 /48 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 60 ms. Remains : 48/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3077743566768819499.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11780837402131056121.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3077743566768819499.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11780837402131056121.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,278528,0.017469,3928,2,124,5,2276,6,0,227,2520,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((!(((r_0_3==1)&&(r_1_3==1))&&(p_1_4==1)))||(((r_0_4==1)&&(r_1_4==1))&&(p_1_5==1))) U A(((p_0_14==1) * !(A(A(((p_0_3==1)&&(r_0_4==1)) U...353
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,((!(((r_0_3==1)&&(r_1_3==1))&&(p_1_4==1)))||(((r_0_4==1)&&(r_1_4==1))&&(p_1_5==1)))) * !(EG(!(!(((E...1024
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t15, t16, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
Using saturation style SCC detection
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 25/0/7
(forward)formula 0,0,2.64792,97512,1,0,3829,565322,126,1980,1628,717655,4654
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2024-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 60/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 10:14:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned [31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59]
Discarding 14 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 54 ms to find 14 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 46/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 57 ms. Remains : 46/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3868285341027598736.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13158345177207917818.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3868285341027598736.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13158345177207917818.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,278528,0.019151,3912,2,119,5,2174,6,0,219,2438,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((E(AG(((EF(((p_0_2==1)&&(r_0_3==1))) * (p_0_4==1)) * (r_0_5==1))) U EF(((EX(((p_0_4==1)&&(r_0_5==1))) + ((p_0_6==1)&&(r_0_7==1))) + ((...353
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(!(E(TRUE U !(((E(TRUE U ((p_0_2==1)&&(r_0_3==1))) * (p_0_4==1)) * (r_0_5==1))))) U E(TR...476
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t15, t16, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
(forward)formula 0,0,0.711849,33724,1,0,1201,176904,105,576,1492,239467,1387
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2024-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 60/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 10:14:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned [31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 43, 45, 49, 51, 55, 57, 59]
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 51 ms to find 12 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 48/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 48 /48 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 54 ms. Remains : 48/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9750779402224604362.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability448580861643631704.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9750779402224604362.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability448580861643631704.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,278528,0.019397,3936,2,125,5,2298,6,0,227,2572,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((EX((((r_0_5==1)&&(r_1_5==1))&&(p_1_6==1))) + (((r_0_8==1)&&(r_1_8==1))&&(p_1_9==1))) U (EF(AX(AF((((r_0_8==1)&&(r_1_8==1))&&(p_1_9==1)...275
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(Init,(EX((((r_0_5==1)&&(r_1_5==1))&&(p_1_6==1))) + (((r_0_8==1)&&(r_1_8==1))&&(p_1_9==1)))) * E(TRUE U...727
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t15, t16, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
(forward)formula 0,1,0.894907,40448,1,0,1409,216772,99,655,1543,293355,1620
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2024-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 60/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 10:14:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned [31, 33, 35, 39, 41, 43, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 58 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 47/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 47 /47 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 62 ms. Remains : 47/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3285481443188011338.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9757985441679801152.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3285481443188011338.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9757985441679801152.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,278528,0.02707,3928,2,122,5,2191,6,0,223,2457,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((AF((((p_0_12==0)||(r_0_13==0))&&(((p_0_1==1)&&(r_0_2==1))||((p_0_10==1)&&(r_0_11==1))))) + (!(A((EX((((r_0_3==1)&&(r_1_3==1))&&(p_1_4...370
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!(EG(!((((p_0_12==0)||(r_0_13==0))&&(((p_0_1==1)&&(r_0_2==1))||((p_0_10==1)&&(r_0_11==1))))))) + (!(...676
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t15, t16, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
(forward)formula 0,0,1.01126,41804,1,0,1313,230033,103,631,1491,301439,1550
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 60/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 10:14:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned [31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59]
Discarding 15 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 52 ms to find 15 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 56 ms. Remains : 45/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16128925057646462199.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12769064773080101840.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16128925057646462199.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12769064773080101840.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,278528,0.021364,3912,2,116,5,2112,6,0,215,2371,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AX(AG(EX(((p_0_4==0)||(r_0_5==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !(EX(((p_0_4==0)||(r_0_5==0))))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t15, t16, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
(forward)formula 0,0,0.055435,5232,1,0,88,10423,85,43,1442,9421,84
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 60/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 10:14:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned [33, 35, 43, 45, 53, 55, 57, 59]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 40 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 52/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 52 /52 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 42 ms. Remains : 52/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10522033795878917465.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9460651500991467236.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10522033795878917465.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9460651500991467236.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,278528,0.025835,3952,2,136,5,2428,6,0,243,2705,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(EX((((r_0_5==0)||(r_1_5==0))||(p_1_6==0)))) + (!(E(!(A(EG((((r_0_10==1)&&(r_1_10==1))&&(p_1_11==1))) U ((((r_0_4==1)&&(r_1_4==1))&&(p...654
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((Init * !(EG(EX((((r_0_5==0)||(r_1_5==0))||(p_1_6==0)))))),!(!((E(!(((((r_0_4==1)&&(r_1_4==1))&&(p_1_5==...965
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t15, t16, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,2.69436,97924,1,0,2546,557549,115,1306,1703,658845,3205
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 60/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 10:14:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned [31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 47, 49, 51, 53, 59]
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 62 ms to find 12 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 48/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 48 /48 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 64 ms. Remains : 48/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:14:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7245558012045934730.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5231879599931307601.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7245558012045934730.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5231879599931307601.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,278528,0.013033,3936,2,125,5,2347,6,0,227,2636,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((EG(((EX((((r_0_7==0)||(r_1_7==0))||(p_1_8==0))) + (((r_0_13==1)&&(r_1_13==1))&&(p_1_14==1))) + ((p_0_4==1)&&(r_0_5==1)))) * (((r_0_12...189
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((EG(((EX((((r_0_7==0)||(r_1_7==0))||(p_1_8==0))) + (((r_0_13==1)&&(r_1_13==1))&&(p_1_14==1))) + ((p...234
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t15, t16, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,1.35914,55348,1,0,464,324957,95,354,1537,326547,602
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2024-05-26 10:14:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:14:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Total runtime 25615 ms.

BK_STOP 1716718482117

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ResAllocation-PT-R015C002"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ResAllocation-PT-R015C002, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r312-tall-171662339500858"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ResAllocation-PT-R015C002.tgz
mv ResAllocation-PT-R015C002 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;