Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r312-tall-171662339400850.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.............................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is ResAllocation-PT-R010C002, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r312-tall-171662339400850
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 496K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.1K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 74K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.7K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 38K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K Apr 23 07:48 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K Apr 23 07:48 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.4K Apr 23 07:48 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Apr 23 07:48 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K Apr 11 23:29 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 140K Apr 11 23:29 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.8K Apr 11 23:28 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 63K Apr 11 23:28 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K Apr 23 07:48 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Apr 23 07:48 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 43K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R010C002-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R010C002-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R010C002-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R010C002-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R010C002-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R010C002-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R010C002-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R010C002-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R010C002-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R010C002-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R010C002-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R010C002-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R010C002-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R010C002-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R010C002-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R010C002-CTLFireability-2023-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716718391210

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ResAllocation-PT-R010C002
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-26 10:13:12] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-26 10:13:12] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-26 10:13:12] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 53 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:12] [INFO ] Transformed 40 places.
[2024-05-26 10:13:12] [INFO ] Transformed 22 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:13:12] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-26 10:13:12] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 40 places and 22 transitions and 100 arcs in 146 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 12 ms.
Support contains 40 out of 40 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 40/40 places, 22/22 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 14 ms. Remains 40 /40 variables (removed 0) and now considering 22/22 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 22 rows 40 cols
[2024-05-26 10:13:12] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 7 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 157 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 10:13:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 10:13:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 93 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 277 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 20 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:13:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 19/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
[2024-05-26 10:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 46 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 10:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 9/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/40 variables, 1/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 1/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 22/62 variables, 40/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 109 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved in 670 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 40/40 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 40/40 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 19/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 9/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/40 variables, 1/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 1/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 22/62 variables, 40/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 20/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 129 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved in 280 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 40/40 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 40/40 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 979ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 992ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1302 ms. Remains : 40/40 places, 22/22 transitions.
Support contains 40 out of 40 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-26 10:13:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 22 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 45 to 35
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1194 resets) in 1085 ms. (36 steps per ms) remains 1/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (338 resets) in 111 ms. (357 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2024-05-26 10:13:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/3 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 2/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/4 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 1/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 4/8 variables, 4/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 6/14 variables, 4/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 4/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 2/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 6/20 variables, 4/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 4/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 2/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 6/26 variables, 4/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 4/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 2/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 6/32 variables, 4/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 4/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 2/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (OVERLAPS) 6/38 variables, 4/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 4/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 2/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (OVERLAPS) 6/44 variables, 4/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 4/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 2/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 33 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 34 (OVERLAPS) 6/50 variables, 4/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 35 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 4/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 36 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 2/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 37 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 38 (OVERLAPS) 6/56 variables, 4/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 39 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 4/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 40 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 2/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 41 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 42 (OVERLAPS) 6/62 variables, 4/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 43 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 4/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 44 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 2/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 45 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 46 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 100 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 192 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 40/40 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 40/40 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/3 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 2/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/4 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 1/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 4/8 variables, 4/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 6/14 variables, 4/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 4/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 2/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 1/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 6/20 variables, 4/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 4/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 2/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 6/26 variables, 4/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 4/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 2/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 6/32 variables, 4/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 4/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 2/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (OVERLAPS) 6/38 variables, 4/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 4/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 2/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (OVERLAPS) 6/44 variables, 4/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 4/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 33 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 2/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 34 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 35 (OVERLAPS) 6/50 variables, 4/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 36 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 4/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 37 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 2/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 38 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 39 (OVERLAPS) 6/56 variables, 4/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 40 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 4/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 41 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 2/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 42 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 43 (OVERLAPS) 6/62 variables, 4/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 44 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 4/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 45 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 2/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 46 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 47 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 101 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 95 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 40/40 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 40/40 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 294ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Finished Parikh walk after 10 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=5 )
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 7 ms.
[2024-05-26 10:13:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 22 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 40/40 places, 22/22 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 40 /40 variables (removed 0) and now considering 22/22 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:13:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 10:13:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 76 ms returned [21, 23, 25, 27, 29, 31, 35, 37, 39]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 81 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 31/40 places, 22/22 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 31 /31 variables (removed 0) and now considering 22/22 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 82 ms. Remains : 31/40 places, 22/22 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:13:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 22 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:13:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8681005919700263355.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16754681049111332530.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8681005919700263355.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16754681049111332530.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6144,0.017303,3384,2,79,5,1030,6,0,149,1107,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AX((A(((p_0_6==1)&&(r_0_7==1)) U (p_1_0==1)) * (((p_0_7==0)||(r_0_8==0))||(((r_0_6==1)&&(r_1_6==1))&&(p_1_7==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!((!((E(!((p_1_0==1)) U (!(((p_0_6==1)&&(r_0_7==1))) * !((p_1_0==1)))) + EG(!((p_1_0==1...244
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t11, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
(forward)formula 0,1,0.137074,10068,1,0,509,40167,72,237,962,46965,564
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R010C002-CTLFireability-2024-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 40/40 places, 22/22 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 40 /40 variables (removed 0) and now considering 22/22 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:13:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 10:13:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned [21, 25, 27, 29, 31, 33, 35, 39]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 45 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 32/40 places, 22/22 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 32 /32 variables (removed 0) and now considering 22/22 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 46 ms. Remains : 32/40 places, 22/22 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:13:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 22 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:13:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9161433066861255208.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10713275006749812077.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9161433066861255208.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10713275006749812077.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6144,0.013412,3504,2,82,5,1057,6,0,153,1134,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(A(AF(((p_0_4==1)&&(r_0_5==1))) U ((A((((r_0_8==1)&&(r_1_8==1))&&(p_1_9==1)) U ((p_0_0==1)&&(r_0_1==1))) + EF((((p_0_0==1)&&(r_0_1==1))...268
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU((((FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(((!((E(!(((p_0_0==1)&&(r_0_1==1))) U (!((((r_0_8==1)&&(r_1_8==1))&&(p_1_9==1)...1645
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t11, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
(forward)formula 0,0,0.234074,14612,1,0,888,67601,84,438,1037,85701,1024
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R010C002-CTLFireability-2024-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 40/40 places, 22/22 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 40 /40 variables (removed 0) and now considering 22/22 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:13:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 10:13:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned [21, 23, 25, 29, 31, 33, 35, 39]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 55 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 32/40 places, 22/22 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 32 /32 variables (removed 0) and now considering 22/22 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 58 ms. Remains : 32/40 places, 22/22 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:13:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 22 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:13:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10067815627110173240.gal : 5 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8939714819369604853.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10067815627110173240.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8939714819369604853.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6144,0.007021,3504,2,82,5,1071,6,0,153,1150,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((AX(EF(AX((((r_0_8==0)||(r_1_8==0))||(p_1_9==0))))) * (AF((((r_0_0==1)&&(r_0_3==1))&&((r_1_3==1)&&(p_1_4==1)))) + ((p_0_2==1)&&(r_0_3=...162
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((EY(Init) * !(EX(!(E(TRUE U !(EX(!((((r_0_8==0)||(r_1_8==0))||(p_1_9==0)))))))))) * !(EG(!((((r_0_0==1)&&(r_0...328
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t11, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
(forward)formula 0,0,0.16217,11740,1,0,479,47526,75,233,1030,58560,561
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R010C002-CTLFireability-2024-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 40/40 places, 22/22 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 40 /40 variables (removed 0) and now considering 22/22 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:13:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 10:13:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned [23, 25, 27, 29, 31, 33, 37, 39]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 52 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 32/40 places, 22/22 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 32 /32 variables (removed 0) and now considering 22/22 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 53 ms. Remains : 32/40 places, 22/22 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:13:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 22 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:13:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7189752429508112239.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7690992727753907199.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7189752429508112239.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7690992727753907199.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6144,0.007111,3504,2,81,5,1044,6,0,153,1119,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((AX((((((p_0_2==0)||(r_0_3==0))&&(((r_0_0==0)||(r_1_0==0))||(p_1_1==0))) * AG(((p_0_0==1)&&(r_0_1==1)))) + EX((((r_0_7==0)||(r_1_7==0)...191
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!(EX(!((((((p_0_2==0)||(r_0_3==0))&&(((r_0_0==0)||(r_1_0==0))||(p_1_1==0))) * !(E(TRUE U !(((p_0_0==...258
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t11, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
(forward)formula 0,1,0.198436,13324,1,0,1017,59281,80,562,1029,72921,1220
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R010C002-CTLFireability-2024-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 40/40 places, 22/22 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 40 /40 variables (removed 0) and now considering 22/22 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:13:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 10:13:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned [21, 23, 25, 27, 29, 31, 35, 39]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 48 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 32/40 places, 22/22 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 32 /32 variables (removed 0) and now considering 22/22 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 50 ms. Remains : 32/40 places, 22/22 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:13:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 22 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:13:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6336665619912670574.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10342966956486434559.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6336665619912670574.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10342966956486434559.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6144,0.00671,3504,2,82,5,1092,6,0,153,1174,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EX((AG((((r_0_6==0)||(r_1_6==0))||(p_1_7==0))) * E((EF(((p_0_5==1)&&(r_0_6==1))) * AF((((r_0_8==1)&&(r_1_8==1))&&(p_1_9==1)))) U !(((p...181
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(E(TRUE U !((((r_0_6==0)||(r_1_6==0))||(p_1_7==0)))))),(E(TRUE U ((p_0_5==1)&&(r_...258
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t11, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
(forward)formula 0,1,0.193661,13852,1,0,920,59251,81,451,1034,81592,1063
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R010C002-CTLFireability-2024-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 40/40 places, 22/22 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 40 /40 variables (removed 0) and now considering 22/22 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:13:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 10:13:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned [25, 27, 35, 37, 39]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 44 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 35/40 places, 22/22 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 35 /35 variables (removed 0) and now considering 22/22 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 45 ms. Remains : 35/40 places, 22/22 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:13:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 22 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:13:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13995944848214902501.gal : 5 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17825194737646715380.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13995944848214902501.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17825194737646715380.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6144,0.007203,3520,2,90,5,1121,6,0,165,1200,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(E((!(((!((((r_0_5==1)&&(r_1_5==1))&&(p_1_6==1))) + A(((p_0_0==1)&&(r_0_1==1)) U (p_0_9==1))) * (!((((r_0_1==1)&&(r_1_1==1))&&(p_1_2==1...374
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E((!(((!((((r_0_5==1)&&(r_1_5==1))&&(p_1_6==1))) + !((E(!((p_0_9==1)) U (!(((p_0_0==1)&&(r_0_1==1))...486
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t11, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,0.277248,16780,1,0,1075,75005,98,669,1172,103191,1171
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R010C002-CTLFireability-2024-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 40/40 places, 22/22 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 37 transition count 20
Applied a total of 5 rules in 22 ms. Remains 37 /40 variables (removed 3) and now considering 20/22 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 20 rows 37 cols
[2024-05-26 10:13:16] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 108 ms returned [20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 36]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 108 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 28/40 places, 20/22 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 28 /28 variables (removed 0) and now considering 20/20 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 132 ms. Remains : 28/40 places, 20/22 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:13:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 20 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:13:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15227526044323011229.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17776243496857139410.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15227526044323011229.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17776243496857139410.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5120,0.006044,3480,2,66,5,784,6,0,135,834,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AF(((p_0_6==0)||(r_0_7==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(((p_0_6==0)||(r_0_7==0))))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 15/4/5
(forward)formula 0,1,0.014064,4060,1,0,8,3233,20,2,733,2600,8
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R010C002-CTLFireability-2024-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 40/40 places, 22/22 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 40 /40 variables (removed 0) and now considering 22/22 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 22 rows 40 cols
[2024-05-26 10:13:16] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned [23, 25, 27, 29, 31, 33, 37, 39]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 41 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 32/40 places, 22/22 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 32 /32 variables (removed 0) and now considering 22/22 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 42 ms. Remains : 32/40 places, 22/22 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:13:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 22 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:13:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11891309571458119100.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10717206922013857512.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11891309571458119100.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10717206922013857512.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6144,0.00714,3508,2,81,5,1044,6,0,153,1119,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX((((r_0_0==0)||(r_1_0==0)) + ((p_1_1==0) + (EG((((r_0_7==0)||(r_1_7==0))||(p_1_8==0))) * ((AG(((p_0_5==0)||(r_0_6==0))) + (p_0_0==0)...175
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX((((r_0_0==0)||(r_1_0==0)) + ((p_1_1==0) + (EG((((r_0_7==0)||(r_1_7==0))||(p_1_8==0))) *...241
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t11, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
(forward)formula 0,0,0.21215,13328,1,0,877,56952,77,416,1024,79438,1005
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R010C002-CTLFireability-2024-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 40/40 places, 22/22 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 40 /40 variables (removed 0) and now considering 22/22 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:13:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 10:13:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned [23, 27, 29, 31, 33, 37]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 39 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 34/40 places, 22/22 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 34 /34 variables (removed 0) and now considering 22/22 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 42 ms. Remains : 34/40 places, 22/22 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:13:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 22 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:13:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4625392340238036101.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15740286721529512969.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4625392340238036101.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15740286721529512969.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6144,0.007141,3520,2,86,5,1132,6,0,161,1195,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((A(((E((r_0_0==1) U ((p_0_2==1)&&(r_0_3==1))) + ((p_0_6==1)&&(r_0_7==1))) + (((p_0_5==1)&&(r_0_6==1)) + (A((p_0_9==1) U ((r_0_9==1)&&...638
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((EX((EG((((p_0_2==1)&&(r_0_3==1))||((p_0_1==1)&&(r_0_2==1)))) + ((((r_0_0==0)||(r_1_0...944
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t11, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
(forward)formula 0,1,0.09008,8324,1,0,508,28138,76,209,1042,31334,602
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R010C002-CTLFireability-2024-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 40/40 places, 22/22 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 40 /40 variables (removed 0) and now considering 22/22 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:13:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 10:13:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned [21, 23, 25, 27, 29, 31, 33, 37, 39]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 45 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 31/40 places, 22/22 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 31 /31 variables (removed 0) and now considering 22/22 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 45 ms. Remains : 31/40 places, 22/22 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:13:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 22 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:13:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3871856586775538848.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11434262516517067410.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3871856586775538848.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11434262516517067410.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6144,0.01354,3496,2,79,5,1037,6,0,149,1115,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(E(((r_0_0==1)||(((r_0_7==1)&&(r_1_7==1))&&(p_1_8==1))) U EX((r_0_0==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(E(((r_0_0==1)||(((r_0_7==1)&&(r_1_7==1))&&(p_1_8==1))) U EX((r_0_0==1)))))))] !...162
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t11, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
(forward)formula 0,0,0.03801,4868,1,0,94,7995,69,48,969,9359,99
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R010C002-CTLFireability-2024-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 40/40 places, 22/22 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 37 transition count 20
Applied a total of 5 rules in 6 ms. Remains 37 /40 variables (removed 3) and now considering 20/22 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 20 rows 37 cols
[2024-05-26 10:13:17] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned [20, 24, 26, 30, 32, 36]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 44 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 31/40 places, 20/22 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 31 /31 variables (removed 0) and now considering 20/20 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 55 ms. Remains : 31/40 places, 20/22 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:13:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 20 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:13:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16651640684332563281.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6496091743470590111.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16651640684332563281.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6496091743470590111.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5120,0.007323,3492,2,74,5,886,6,0,147,940,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(E((((r_0_2==1)&&(r_1_2==1))&&(p_1_3==1)) U !(AF(((((p_0_7==1)&&(r_0_8==1))||(((r_0_5==1)&&(r_1_5==1))&&(p_1_6==1)))||((((p_0_6==1)&&(r_...235
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,E((((r_0_2==1)&&(r_1_2==1))&&(p_1_3==1)) U !(!(EG(!(((((p_0_7==1)&&(r_0_8==1))||(((r_0_5==1)&&(r_1_5...287
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t18, t19, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
(forward)formula 0,0,0.176863,12520,1,0,721,51557,72,364,961,73047,820
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R010C002-CTLFireability-2024-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 40/40 places, 22/22 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 40 /40 variables (removed 0) and now considering 22/22 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 22 rows 40 cols
[2024-05-26 10:13:17] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned [21, 23, 25, 27, 35, 37, 39]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 49 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 33/40 places, 22/22 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 33 /33 variables (removed 0) and now considering 22/22 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 49 ms. Remains : 33/40 places, 22/22 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:13:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 22 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:13:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6787693431390186832.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability739649467850689706.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6787693431390186832.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability739649467850689706.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6144,0.007549,3512,2,85,5,1105,6,0,157,1185,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AX(!(E(!(EG((((r_0_5==1)&&(r_1_5==1))&&(p_1_6==1)))) U (AX((((r_0_4==1)&&(r_1_4==1))&&(p_1_5==1))) * AF((((r_0_6==1)&&(r_1_6==1))&&(p_...169
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(EY(EY(Init)),!(EG((((r_0_5==1)&&(r_1_5==1))&&(p_1_6==1))))) * !(EX(!((((r_0_4==1)&&(r_1_4==1))&&(p_1_5==...223
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t11, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
(forward)formula 0,0,0.212311,13860,1,0,896,59879,75,417,1057,83173,1069
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R010C002-CTLFireability-2024-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 40/40 places, 22/22 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 40 /40 variables (removed 0) and now considering 22/22 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:13:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 10:13:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned [21, 23, 25, 29, 31, 33, 37, 39]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 41 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 32/40 places, 22/22 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 32 /32 variables (removed 0) and now considering 22/22 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 43 ms. Remains : 32/40 places, 22/22 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:13:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 22 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:13:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12543526030329300174.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4913245048953019813.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12543526030329300174.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4913245048953019813.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6144,0.008529,3504,2,82,5,1064,6,0,153,1142,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EF((((EG(((p_0_4==0)||(r_0_5==0))) * (r_0_7==1)) * ((r_1_7==1)&&(p_1_8==1))) * (((r_0_3==0)||(r_1_3==0))||(p_1_4==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((((FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * (((r_0_3==0)||(r_1_3==0))||(p_1_4==0))) * ((r_1_7==1)&&(p_1_8==1))) * (r_0_7==1))...191
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 17/0/5
(forward)formula 0,1,0.028248,4612,1,0,19,6195,23,7,849,5833,14
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R010C002-CTLFireability-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 40/40 places, 22/22 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 40 /40 variables (removed 0) and now considering 22/22 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:13:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 10:13:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned [21, 23, 25, 27, 29, 31, 33, 35, 37, 39]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 44 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 30/40 places, 22/22 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 22/22 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 47 ms. Remains : 30/40 places, 22/22 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:13:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 22 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:13:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15208298540350247591.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7050916218340827249.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15208298540350247591.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7050916218340827249.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6144,0.007437,3488,2,76,5,982,6,0,145,1056,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((p_0_5==1)&&(r_0_6==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * ((p_0_5==1)&&(r_0_6==1)))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 0,0,0.008359,3804,1,0,8,982,8,1,209,1056,2
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R010C002-CTLFireability-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 40/40 places, 22/22 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 40 /40 variables (removed 0) and now considering 22/22 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:13:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 10:13:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned [21, 23, 25, 31, 33, 37, 39]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 34 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 33/40 places, 22/22 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 33 /33 variables (removed 0) and now considering 22/22 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 35 ms. Remains : 33/40 places, 22/22 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:13:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 22 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:13:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18279583497971283956.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7488484206234263107.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18279583497971283956.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7488484206234263107.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6144,0.008346,3512,2,85,5,1094,6,0,157,1177,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EG((((r_0_3==1)&&(r_1_3==1))&&(p_1_4==1))) U (EG(EF(((p_0_3==1)&&(r_0_4==1)))) + E((((p_0_3==1)&&(r_0_4==1)) + EX(((((r_0_4==1)&&(r_1_4...294
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(FwdU(Init,EG((((r_0_3==1)&&(r_1_3==1))&&(p_1_4==1)))),E(TRUE U ((p_0_3==1)&&(r_0_4==1))))] != FALSE + [(F...414
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t11, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
(forward)formula 0,1,0.08401,7788,1,0,303,24431,80,203,1042,34814,366
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R010C002-CTLFireability-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 40/40 places, 22/22 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 40 /40 variables (removed 0) and now considering 22/22 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:13:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 10:13:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned [21, 23, 25, 27, 31, 33, 35, 37, 39]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 44 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 31/40 places, 22/22 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 31 /31 variables (removed 0) and now considering 22/22 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 46 ms. Remains : 31/40 places, 22/22 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:13:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 22 transitions.
[2024-05-26 10:13:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15713511845036499193.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8841135618308270392.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15713511845036499193.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8841135618308270392.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6144,0.006669,3504,2,79,5,1012,6,0,149,1091,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((p_0_5==1)&&(r_0_6==1)) U AX(EF((((p_0_8==1)&&(r_0_9==1))||(((r_0_4==1)&&(r_1_4==1))&&(p_1_5==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,((p_0_5==1)&&(r_0_6==1))) * !(EX(!(E(TRUE U (((p_0_8==1)&&(r_0_9==1))||(((r_0_4==1)&&(r_1_4==1))&&(p...180
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t11, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 17/4/5
(forward)formula 0,1,0.019716,4348,1,0,64,4549,72,31,991,3973,64
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R010C002-CTLFireability-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2024-05-26 10:13:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-26 10:13:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
Total runtime 6054 ms.

BK_STOP 1716718398429

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ResAllocation-PT-R010C002"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ResAllocation-PT-R010C002, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r312-tall-171662339400850"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ResAllocation-PT-R010C002.tgz
mv ResAllocation-PT-R010C002 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;