Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r312-tall-171662339400820.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is ResAllocation-PT-R003C020, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r312-tall-171662339400820
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 616K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 59K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.5K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 45K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Apr 23 07:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K Apr 23 07:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.4K Apr 23 07:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Apr 23 07:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K Apr 11 23:18 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 140K Apr 11 23:18 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Apr 11 23:17 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 86K Apr 11 23:17 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K Apr 23 07:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Apr 23 07:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 143K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716716944220

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ResAllocation-PT-R003C020
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-26 09:49:05] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-26 09:49:05] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-26 09:49:05] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 77 ms
[2024-05-26 09:49:05] [INFO ] Transformed 120 places.
[2024-05-26 09:49:05] [INFO ] Transformed 80 transitions.
[2024-05-26 09:49:05] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-26 09:49:05] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 120 places and 80 transitions and 354 arcs in 170 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 10 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 54 out of 120 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 120/120 places, 80/80 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 12 ms. Remains 120 /120 variables (removed 0) and now considering 80/80 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 120 cols
[2024-05-26 09:49:05] [INFO ] Computed 60 invariants in 11 ms
[2024-05-26 09:49:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 252 ms returned [117]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 282 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 119/120 places, 80/80 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 119 /119 variables (removed 0) and now considering 80/80 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 314 ms. Remains : 119/120 places, 80/80 transitions.
Support contains 54 out of 119 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-26 09:49:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2024-05-26 09:49:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-26 09:49:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 80 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 26 to 25
RANDOM walk for 12331 steps (280 resets) in 424 ms. (29 steps per ms) remains 0/25 properties
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((X(G(p1))||G(p2)||p0)))'
Support contains 6 out of 119 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 119 /119 variables (removed 0) and now considering 80/80 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 119 cols
[2024-05-26 09:49:06] [INFO ] Computed 59 invariants in 10 ms
[2024-05-26 09:49:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 112 ms returned [115, 118]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 115 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 117/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 117 /117 variables (removed 0) and now considering 80/80 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 126 ms. Remains : 117/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 491 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-00
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1762 steps with 329 reset in 36 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-00 finished in 729 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((!p0&&X((!p0 U (X((p1||G(!p2)))||G(!p0)))))))'
Support contains 5 out of 119 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 119 /119 variables (removed 0) and now considering 80/80 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 09:49:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 09:49:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 106 ms returned [115, 118]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 108 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 117/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 117 /117 variables (removed 0) and now considering 80/80 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 117 ms. Remains : 117/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 380 ms :[true, p0, p2, (AND p2 (NOT p1)), (AND p2 p0 (NOT p1)), p0, (AND p0 p2 (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-01
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 245 steps with 11 reset in 4 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-01 finished in 523 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(p0)&&F(p1)&&F(G(p2)))))'
Support contains 9 out of 119 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Performed 17 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 17
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 101 transition count 63
Applied a total of 35 rules in 29 ms. Remains 101 /119 variables (removed 18) and now considering 63/80 (removed 17) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 63 rows 101 cols
[2024-05-26 09:49:08] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-26 09:49:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 83 ms returned [100]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 84 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 100/119 places, 63/80 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 100 /100 variables (removed 0) and now considering 63/63 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 117 ms. Remains : 100/119 places, 63/80 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 155 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1), (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-02
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 43 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-02 finished in 293 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((F(p0) U X(G((p1||G(p2))))))'
Support contains 7 out of 119 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 119 /119 variables (removed 0) and now considering 80/80 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 119 cols
[2024-05-26 09:49:08] [INFO ] Computed 59 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-26 09:49:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 87 ms returned [115, 118]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 88 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 117/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 117 /117 variables (removed 0) and now considering 80/80 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 93 ms. Remains : 117/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 191 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-03
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 36 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-03 finished in 310 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(X((G(p0)||X(X(X(F(p1)))))))))'
Support contains 6 out of 119 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 119 /119 variables (removed 0) and now considering 80/80 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 09:49:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 09:49:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 88 ms returned [115, 118]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 88 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 117/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 117 /117 variables (removed 0) and now considering 80/80 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 93 ms. Remains : 117/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 387 ms :[(NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-04
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 5806 reset in 372 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 5779 reset in 425 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 91 ms. Reduced automaton from 10 states, 14 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 10 states, 14 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 427 ms :[(NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
RANDOM walk for 2448 steps (54 resets) in 42 ms. (56 steps per ms) remains 0/4 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT (OR p0 p1))), (F (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT p0)), (F p1)]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 182 ms. Reduced automaton from 10 states, 14 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 10 states, 14 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 443 ms :[(NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 440 ms :[(NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Support contains 6 out of 117 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 117/117 places, 80/80 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 117 /117 variables (removed 0) and now considering 80/80 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 117 cols
[2024-05-26 09:49:11] [INFO ] Computed 57 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-26 09:49:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 82 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 09:49:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 09:49:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 101 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 185 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 60 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-26 09:49:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 117/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 57/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
[2024-05-26 09:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 09:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 09:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 09:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 09:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 09:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 09:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 09:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 09:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 09:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 09:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 09:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 09:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 09:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 09:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 09:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 09:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 09:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 09:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 09:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 20/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
[2024-05-26 09:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 09:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 09:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 09:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 09:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 09:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 09:49:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-26 09:49:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 8/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 80/197 variables, 117/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/197 variables, 0/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 197/197 variables, and 319 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved in 2172 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 117/117 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 57/57 constraints, State Equation: 117/117 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 117/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 57/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 28/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 80/197 variables, 117/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 60/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
[2024-05-26 09:49:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 1/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/197 variables, 0/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 197/197 variables, and 380 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved in 1854 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 117/117 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 57/57 constraints, State Equation: 117/117 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps: 29/29 constraints]
After SMT, in 4072ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4085ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4276 ms. Remains : 117/117 places, 80/80 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 83 ms. Reduced automaton from 10 states, 14 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 10 states, 14 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 402 ms :[(NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
RANDOM walk for 646 steps (14 resets) in 18 ms. (34 steps per ms) remains 0/4 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT (OR p0 p1))), (F (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT p0)), (F p1)]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 160 ms. Reduced automaton from 10 states, 14 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 10 states, 14 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 351 ms :[(NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 302 ms :[(NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 478 ms :[(NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 5800 reset in 303 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 1198 steps with 64 reset with depth 42 and stack size 42 in 4 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-04 finished in 9344 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((F(p0) U (p1 U X(p2)))))'
Support contains 5 out of 119 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 119 /119 variables (removed 0) and now considering 80/80 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 119 cols
[2024-05-26 09:49:17] [INFO ] Computed 59 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-26 09:49:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 102 ms returned [115, 118]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 103 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 117/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 117 /117 variables (removed 0) and now considering 80/80 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 107 ms. Remains : 117/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 201 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-05
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 42 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-05 finished in 329 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((F(F(p0))&&!(p0 U p1)))'
Support contains 4 out of 119 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Performed 18 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 18
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 100 transition count 62
Applied a total of 37 rules in 11 ms. Remains 100 /119 variables (removed 19) and now considering 62/80 (removed 18) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 62 rows 100 cols
[2024-05-26 09:49:18] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-26 09:49:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 99 ms returned [99]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 99 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 99/119 places, 62/80 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 99 /99 variables (removed 0) and now considering 62/62 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 113 ms. Remains : 99/119 places, 62/80 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 116 ms :[true, (NOT p0), p1, (OR (NOT p0) p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-06
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 44 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-06 finished in 244 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 4 out of 119 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Performed 19 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 19
Deduced a syphon composed of 19 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 99 transition count 61
Applied a total of 39 rules in 14 ms. Remains 99 /119 variables (removed 20) and now considering 61/80 (removed 19) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 61 rows 99 cols
[2024-05-26 09:49:18] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-26 09:49:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 81 ms returned [98]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 82 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/119 places, 61/80 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 98 /98 variables (removed 0) and now considering 61/61 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 100 ms. Remains : 98/119 places, 61/80 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 40 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-08
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 49 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-08 finished in 155 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((p0 U X(G(p0)))))'
Support contains 1 out of 119 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 119 /119 variables (removed 0) and now considering 80/80 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 119 cols
[2024-05-26 09:49:18] [INFO ] Computed 59 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-26 09:49:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 92 ms returned [115, 118]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 94 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 117/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 117 /117 variables (removed 0) and now considering 80/80 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 95 ms. Remains : 117/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 139 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-09
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 2 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-09 finished in 250 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(X((F(p0) U p1)))))'
Support contains 7 out of 119 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 119 /119 variables (removed 0) and now considering 80/80 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 09:49:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 09:49:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 90 ms returned [115, 118]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 91 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 117/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 117 /117 variables (removed 0) and now considering 80/80 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 94 ms. Remains : 117/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 206 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-10
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 40 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-10 finished in 316 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((G((p0&&F(p1)))||(p0&&X((F(p1)&&F(!p2)))))))'
Support contains 9 out of 119 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 119 /119 variables (removed 0) and now considering 80/80 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 09:49:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 09:49:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 80 ms returned [115, 118]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 89 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 117/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 117 /117 variables (removed 0) and now considering 80/80 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 93 ms. Remains : 117/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 228 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (OR (NOT p1) (AND (NOT p0) p2)), (NOT p1), (OR (AND (NOT p0) p2) (AND (NOT p1) p2)), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-11
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 46 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-11 finished in 346 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 119 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Performed 19 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 19
Deduced a syphon composed of 19 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 99 transition count 61
Applied a total of 39 rules in 6 ms. Remains 99 /119 variables (removed 20) and now considering 61/80 (removed 19) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 61 rows 99 cols
[2024-05-26 09:49:19] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-26 09:49:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 09:49:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 09:49:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 91 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 166 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-26 09:49:19] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 41 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-26 09:49:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 98/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 57/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/99 variables, 1/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 1/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 61/160 variables, 99/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/160 variables, 0/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 160/160 variables, and 256 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved in 783 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 99/99 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 58/58 constraints, State Equation: 99/99 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 98/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 57/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/99 variables, 1/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 1/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 61/160 variables, 99/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 41/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/160 variables, 0/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 160/160 variables, and 297 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved in 718 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 99/99 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 58/58 constraints, State Equation: 99/99 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1512ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1515ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 99/119 places, 61/80 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1692 ms. Remains : 99/119 places, 61/80 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 97 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-12
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 86 steps with 2 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-12 finished in 1801 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 119 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Performed 18 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 18
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 100 transition count 62
Applied a total of 37 rules in 4 ms. Remains 100 /119 variables (removed 19) and now considering 62/80 (removed 18) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 62 rows 100 cols
[2024-05-26 09:49:21] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-26 09:49:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 100 ms returned [99]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 104 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 99/119 places, 62/80 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 99 /99 variables (removed 0) and now considering 62/62 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 115 ms. Remains : 99/119 places, 62/80 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 30 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-13
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2365 reset in 292 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 15322 steps with 360 reset with depth 46 and stack size 46 in 46 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-13 finished in 502 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F(p0)))'
Support contains 5 out of 119 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 119 /119 variables (removed 0) and now considering 80/80 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 119 cols
[2024-05-26 09:49:21] [INFO ] Computed 59 invariants in 5 ms
[2024-05-26 09:49:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 101 ms returned [118]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 102 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 118/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 118 /118 variables (removed 0) and now considering 80/80 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 104 ms. Remains : 118/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 95 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-14
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 38 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-14 finished in 224 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F((p0&&X((F(p1)||G(p0)))))))'
Support contains 4 out of 119 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Performed 19 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 19
Deduced a syphon composed of 19 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 99 transition count 61
Applied a total of 39 rules in 5 ms. Remains 99 /119 variables (removed 20) and now considering 61/80 (removed 19) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 61 rows 99 cols
[2024-05-26 09:49:22] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-26 09:49:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 134 ms returned [98]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 135 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/119 places, 61/80 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 98 /98 variables (removed 0) and now considering 61/61 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 144 ms. Remains : 98/119 places, 61/80 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 187 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-15
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3213 reset in 359 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 166 steps with 5 reset with depth 4 and stack size 4 in 1 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-LTLFireability-15 finished in 706 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 17522 ms.

BK_STOP 1716716962883

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ResAllocation-PT-R003C020"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ResAllocation-PT-R003C020, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r312-tall-171662339400820"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ResAllocation-PT-R003C020.tgz
mv ResAllocation-PT-R003C020 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;