About the Execution of ITS-Tools for Referendum-PT-0100
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
529.979 | 47345.00 | 69402.00 | 308.40 | FFFFFTFFTTTTTTFT | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r312-tall-171662338900612.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is Referendum-PT-0100, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r312-tall-171662338900612
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 2.9M
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 73K Apr 11 16:33 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 361K Apr 11 16:33 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 33K Apr 11 16:28 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 254K Apr 11 16:28 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 52K Apr 23 07:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 189K Apr 23 07:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Apr 23 07:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 102K Apr 23 07:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 146K Apr 11 16:50 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 748K Apr 11 16:50 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 93K Apr 11 16:39 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 690K Apr 11 16:39 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.9K Apr 23 07:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K Apr 23 07:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 113K May 18 16:43 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1716700177279
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=Referendum-PT-0100
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-26 05:09:38] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-26 05:09:38] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-26 05:09:38] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 84 ms
[2024-05-26 05:09:38] [INFO ] Transformed 301 places.
[2024-05-26 05:09:38] [INFO ] Transformed 201 transitions.
[2024-05-26 05:09:38] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-26 05:09:38] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 301 places and 201 transitions and 501 arcs in 186 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 18 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Support contains 101 out of 301 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 301/301 places, 201/201 transitions.
Reduce places removed 200 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 100 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 100 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 300 rules applied. Total rules applied 300 place count 101 transition count 101
Applied a total of 300 rules in 19 ms. Remains 101 /301 variables (removed 200) and now considering 101/201 (removed 100) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 101 cols
[2024-05-26 05:09:38] [INFO ] Computed 0 invariants in 7 ms
[2024-05-26 05:09:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 138 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 05:09:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 05:09:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 86 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 253 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 100 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-26 05:09:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 100/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 101/201 variables, 100/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/202 variables, 1/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 1/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/202 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 202/202 variables, and 202 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved in 1858 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 101/101 constraints, State Equation: 101/101 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 100/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 101/201 variables, 100/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 100/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/202 variables, 1/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 1/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/202 variables, 0/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 202/202 variables, and 302 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved in 2263 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 101/101 constraints, State Equation: 101/101 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 4177ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4198ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 101/301 places, 101/201 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4488 ms. Remains : 101/301 places, 101/201 transitions.
Support contains 101 out of 101 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-26 05:09:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2024-05-26 05:09:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2024-05-26 05:09:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 101 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 18 to 15
RANDOM walk for 344 steps (1 resets) in 25 ms. (13 steps per ms) remains 0/15 properties
Computed a total of 101 stabilizing places and 101 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 101 transition count 101
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((F(p0)&&F(G(p1))))'
Support contains 101 out of 101 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 101/101 places, 101/101 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 101 /101 variables (removed 0) and now considering 101/101 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 05:09:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 05:09:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 05:09:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 05:09:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 94 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-26 05:09:44] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 100 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-26 05:09:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 100/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 101/201 variables, 100/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/202 variables, 1/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 1/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/202 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 202/202 variables, and 202 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved in 1650 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 101/101 constraints, State Equation: 101/101 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 100/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 101/201 variables, 100/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 100/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/202 variables, 1/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 1/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/202 variables, 0/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 202/202 variables, and 302 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved in 2152 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 101/101 constraints, State Equation: 101/101 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 3817ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3818ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3923 ms. Remains : 101/101 places, 101/101 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 245 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-00
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 107 steps with 3 reset in 3 ms.
FORMULA Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-00 finished in 4233 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 100 out of 101 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 101/101 places, 101/101 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 101 /101 variables (removed 0) and now considering 101/101 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 05:09:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 05:09:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 25 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 05:09:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 05:09:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 74 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 101 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-26 05:09:48] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 100 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-26 05:09:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 100/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 101/201 variables, 100/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/202 variables, 1/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 1/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/202 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 202/202 variables, and 202 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved in 1618 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 101/101 constraints, State Equation: 101/101 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 100/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 101/201 variables, 100/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 100/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/202 variables, 1/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 1/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/202 variables, 0/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 202/202 variables, and 302 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved in 2167 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 101/101 constraints, State Equation: 101/101 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 3805ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3810ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3926 ms. Remains : 101/101 places, 101/101 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 47 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-01
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 101 steps with 0 reset in 3 ms.
FORMULA Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-01 finished in 3992 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(G(p0))&&F(!p1))))'
Support contains 101 out of 101 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 101/101 places, 101/101 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 101 /101 variables (removed 0) and now considering 101/101 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 05:09:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 05:09:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 05:09:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 05:09:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 50 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 84 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-26 05:09:52] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 100 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-26 05:09:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 100/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 101/201 variables, 100/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/202 variables, 1/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 1/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/202 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 202/202 variables, and 202 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved in 1547 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 101/101 constraints, State Equation: 101/101 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 100/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 101/201 variables, 100/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 100/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/202 variables, 1/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 1/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/202 variables, 0/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 202/202 variables, and 302 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved in 2212 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 101/101 constraints, State Equation: 101/101 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 3772ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3773ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3872 ms. Remains : 101/101 places, 101/101 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 129 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) p1), (NOT p0), p1]
Running random walk in product with property : Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-02
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 101 steps with 0 reset in 2 ms.
FORMULA Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-02 finished in 4024 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G(p0)||(!p1 U X(!p1))))'
Support contains 101 out of 101 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 101/101 places, 101/101 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 101 /101 variables (removed 0) and now considering 101/101 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 05:09:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 05:09:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 05:09:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 05:09:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 59 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 96 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 100 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-26 05:09:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 100/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 101/201 variables, 100/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/202 variables, 1/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 1/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/202 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 202/202 variables, and 202 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved in 1571 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 101/101 constraints, State Equation: 101/101 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 100/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 101/201 variables, 100/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 100/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/202 variables, 1/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 1/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/202 variables, 0/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 202/202 variables, and 302 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved in 2158 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 101/101 constraints, State Equation: 101/101 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 3740ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3742ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3840 ms. Remains : 101/101 places, 101/101 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 349 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND p1 (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p0) p1), (NOT p0), p1, p1]
Running random walk in product with property : Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-03
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 2 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-03 finished in 4214 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(X(F(G(F(G(((!X(p0) U p1)&&p0))))))))'
Support contains 101 out of 101 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 101/101 places, 101/101 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 101 /101 variables (removed 0) and now considering 101/101 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 05:10:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 05:10:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 05:10:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 05:10:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 58 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 93 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-26 05:10:00] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 100 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-26 05:10:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 100/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 101/201 variables, 100/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/202 variables, 1/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 1/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/202 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 202/202 variables, and 202 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved in 1599 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 101/101 constraints, State Equation: 101/101 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 100/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 101/201 variables, 100/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 100/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/202 variables, 1/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 1/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/202 variables, 0/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 202/202 variables, and 302 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved in 2203 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 101/101 constraints, State Equation: 101/101 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 3815ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3816ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3920 ms. Remains : 101/101 places, 101/101 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 45 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-04
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 101 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-04 finished in 3984 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((p0 U X((X(p2)||p1)))))'
Support contains 101 out of 101 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 101/101 places, 101/101 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 101 /101 variables (removed 0) and now considering 101/101 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 05:10:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 05:10:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 05:10:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 05:10:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 60 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 93 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 100 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-26 05:10:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 100/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 101/201 variables, 100/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/202 variables, 1/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 1/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/202 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 202/202 variables, and 202 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved in 1597 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 101/101 constraints, State Equation: 101/101 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 100/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 101/201 variables, 100/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 100/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/202 variables, 1/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 1/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/202 variables, 0/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 202/202 variables, and 302 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved in 2181 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 101/101 constraints, State Equation: 101/101 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 3795ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3796ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3889 ms. Remains : 101/101 places, 101/101 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 306 ms :[(NOT p2), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), true]
Running random walk in product with property : Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-05
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 581 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 469 ms.
Computed a total of 101 stabilizing places and 101 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 101 transition count 101
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) p0 (NOT p1)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1)), (F (G (NOT p2))), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 23 ms. Reduced automaton from 8 states, 11 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-05 finished in 5366 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((p0||(F(p1)&&X(G(p0))))))'
Support contains 100 out of 101 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 101/101 places, 101/101 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 101 /101 variables (removed 0) and now considering 101/101 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 05:10:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 05:10:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 05:10:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 05:10:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 53 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 89 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 100 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-26 05:10:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 100/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 101/201 variables, 100/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/202 variables, 1/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 1/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/202 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 202/202 variables, and 202 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved in 1575 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 101/101 constraints, State Equation: 101/101 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 100/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 101/201 variables, 100/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 100/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/202 variables, 1/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 1/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/202 variables, 0/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 202/202 variables, and 302 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved in 2180 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 101/101 constraints, State Equation: 101/101 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 3766ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3767ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3857 ms. Remains : 101/101 places, 101/101 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 160 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), true, (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-06
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 2 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-06 finished in 4030 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G(p0)))'
Support contains 100 out of 101 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 101/101 places, 101/101 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 101 /101 variables (removed 0) and now considering 101/101 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 05:10:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 05:10:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 26 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 05:10:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 05:10:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 57 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 84 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 100 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-26 05:10:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 100/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 101/201 variables, 100/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/202 variables, 1/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 1/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/202 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 202/202 variables, and 202 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved in 1597 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 101/101 constraints, State Equation: 101/101 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 100/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 101/201 variables, 100/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 100/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/202 variables, 1/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 1/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/202 variables, 0/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 202/202 variables, and 302 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved in 2153 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 101/101 constraints, State Equation: 101/101 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 3762ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3763ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3847 ms. Remains : 101/101 places, 101/101 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 86 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-07
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-07 finished in 3944 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((!(p0 U p1)&&p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 101 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 101/101 places, 101/101 transitions.
Discarding 98 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 98 rule applications. Total rules 98 place count 3 transition count 3
Iterating global reduction 0 with 98 rules applied. Total rules applied 196 place count 3 transition count 3
Applied a total of 196 rules in 15 ms. Remains 3 /101 variables (removed 98) and now considering 3/101 (removed 98) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 3 rows 3 cols
[2024-05-26 05:10:17] [INFO ] Computed 0 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-26 05:10:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 14 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 05:10:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 05:10:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 20 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 35 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 2 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-26 05:10:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 3/5 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/6 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/6 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 6/6 variables, and 3 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 24 ms.
Refiners :[State Equation: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 3/5 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 2/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/6 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/6 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 6/6 variables, and 5 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 22 ms.
Refiners :[State Equation: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 47ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 47ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 3/101 places, 3/101 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 97 ms. Remains : 3/101 places, 3/101 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 129 ms :[true, (OR (NOT p0) p1), (OR (NOT p0) p1), p1]
Running random walk in product with property : Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-08
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25057 reset in 74 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25043 reset in 82 ms.
Computed a total of 3 stabilizing places and 3 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 3 transition count 3
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p1), (X (AND p0 (NOT p1))), (X (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p1))), (X p0), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 8 factoid took 188 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 120 ms :[true, p1, p1, p1]
RANDOM walk for 4 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (0 steps per ms) remains 0/3 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p1), (X (AND p0 (NOT p1))), (X (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p1))), (X p0), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p1))), (F (NOT p1)), (F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 8 factoid took 331 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 135 ms :[true, p1, p1, p1]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 123 ms :[true, p1, p1, p1]
[2024-05-26 05:10:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 05:10:19] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 1 ms returned sat
[2024-05-26 05:10:19] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 2/2/2 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 1 ms.
[2024-05-26 05:10:19] [INFO ] Added : 0 causal constraints over 0 iterations in 14 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG p1
Support contains 2 out of 3 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 3/3 places, 3/3 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 3 /3 variables (removed 0) and now considering 3/3 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 05:10:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 05:10:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 14 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 05:10:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 05:10:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 17 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 33 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 2 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-26 05:10:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 3/5 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/6 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/6 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 6/6 variables, and 3 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 24 ms.
Refiners :[State Equation: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 3/5 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 2/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/6 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/6 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 6/6 variables, and 5 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 23 ms.
Refiners :[State Equation: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 50ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 50ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 83 ms. Remains : 3/3 places, 3/3 transitions.
Computed a total of 3 stabilizing places and 3 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 3 transition count 3
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 202 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 128 ms :[true, p1, p1, p1]
RANDOM walk for 4 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (0 steps per ms) remains 0/3 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p1))), (F (NOT p1)), (F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 304 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 131 ms :[true, p1, p1, p1]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 115 ms :[true, p1, p1, p1]
[2024-05-26 05:10:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 05:10:20] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 1 ms returned sat
[2024-05-26 05:10:20] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 2/2/2 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 1 ms.
[2024-05-26 05:10:20] [INFO ] Added : 0 causal constraints over 0 iterations in 8 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG p1
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 116 ms :[true, p1, p1, p1]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25041 reset in 37 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25012 reset in 52 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [true, true, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 125 ms :[true, p1, p1, p1]
Support contains 2 out of 3 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 3/3 places, 3/3 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 2 edges and 3 vertex of which 2 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 7 ms. Remains 2 /3 variables (removed 1) and now considering 2/3 (removed 1) transitions.
[2024-05-26 05:10:20] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 1 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 2 rows 2 cols
[2024-05-26 05:10:20] [INFO ] Computed 0 invariants in 0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/3 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/4 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/4 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 4/4 variables, and 2 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 18 ms.
Refiners :[State Equation: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/3 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/4 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/4 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 4/4 variables, and 3 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 19 ms.
Refiners :[State Equation: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 39ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 2/3 places, 2/3 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 51 ms. Remains : 2/3 places, 2/3 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin6426701495352235387
[2024-05-26 05:10:20] [INFO ] Built C files in 7ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin6426701495352235387
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin6426701495352235387;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 168 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin6426701495352235387;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 38 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin6426701495352235387;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased5590894259813936940.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 623 ms.
FORMULA Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-08 finished in 3854 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(F(((F(p1) U p2)||p0)))))'
Support contains 2 out of 101 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 101/101 places, 101/101 transitions.
Discarding 96 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 96 rule applications. Total rules 96 place count 5 transition count 5
Iterating global reduction 0 with 96 rules applied. Total rules applied 192 place count 5 transition count 5
Applied a total of 192 rules in 3 ms. Remains 5 /101 variables (removed 96) and now considering 5/101 (removed 96) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 5 rows 5 cols
[2024-05-26 05:10:21] [INFO ] Computed 0 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-26 05:10:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 15 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 05:10:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 05:10:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 19 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 36 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 4 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-26 05:10:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 5/9 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/10 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/10 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 10/10 variables, and 5 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 36 ms.
Refiners :[State Equation: 5/5 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 5/9 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 4/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/10 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/10 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 10/10 variables, and 9 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 39 ms.
Refiners :[State Equation: 5/5 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 80ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 81ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 5/101 places, 5/101 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 120 ms. Remains : 5/101 places, 5/101 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 115 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-09
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 119 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 139 ms.
Computed a total of 5 stabilizing places and 5 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 5 transition count 5
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))), (X (X p0)), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G (NOT p2)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT p2)))]
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 16 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-09 finished in 552 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(p0))'
Support contains 1 out of 101 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 101/101 places, 101/101 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 100 edges and 101 vertex of which 1 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 100 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 100 places :
Also discarding 100 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 100 transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 3 ms. Remains 1 /101 variables (removed 100) and now considering 1/101 (removed 100) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1 rows 1 cols
[2024-05-26 05:10:22] [INFO ] Computed 0 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-26 05:10:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 15 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 05:10:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 05:10:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 19 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 35 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-26 05:10:22] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 0 sub problems to find dead transitions.
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 0ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 1/101 places, 1/101 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 44 ms. Remains : 1/101 places, 1/101 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 46 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-10
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 24 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 24 ms.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 1 transition count 1
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X p0), (X (X p0)), (F (G p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 19 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-10 finished in 191 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F((G(F(p0))||(F(p0)&&(!p1||X(!p2)))))))'
Support contains 2 out of 101 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 101/101 places, 101/101 transitions.
Discarding 97 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 97 rule applications. Total rules 97 place count 4 transition count 4
Iterating global reduction 0 with 97 rules applied. Total rules applied 194 place count 4 transition count 4
Applied a total of 194 rules in 5 ms. Remains 4 /101 variables (removed 97) and now considering 4/101 (removed 97) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 4 rows 4 cols
[2024-05-26 05:10:22] [INFO ] Computed 0 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-26 05:10:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 05:10:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 05:10:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 18 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 53 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 3 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-26 05:10:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 4/7 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/8 variables, 1/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/8 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 8/8 variables, and 4 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved in 28 ms.
Refiners :[State Equation: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 4/7 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/8 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/8 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 8/8 variables, and 7 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved in 28 ms.
Refiners :[State Equation: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 61ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 4/101 places, 4/101 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 119 ms. Remains : 4/101 places, 4/101 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 187 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-11
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 31 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 47 ms.
Computed a total of 4 stabilizing places and 4 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 4 transition count 4
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (X p0), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X p2)), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p2)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (AND p1 p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 p2)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p2)))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 22 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 6 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-11 finished in 449 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((F(p0)||G(p1))))'
Support contains 2 out of 101 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 101/101 places, 101/101 transitions.
Discarding 97 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 97 rule applications. Total rules 97 place count 4 transition count 4
Iterating global reduction 0 with 97 rules applied. Total rules applied 194 place count 4 transition count 4
Applied a total of 194 rules in 3 ms. Remains 4 /101 variables (removed 97) and now considering 4/101 (removed 97) transitions.
[2024-05-26 05:10:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 05:10:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 19 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 05:10:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 05:10:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 22 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 44 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 3 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-26 05:10:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 4/7 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/8 variables, 1/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/8 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 8/8 variables, and 4 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved in 27 ms.
Refiners :[State Equation: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 4/7 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/8 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/8 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 8/8 variables, and 7 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved in 27 ms.
Refiners :[State Equation: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 56ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 57ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 4/101 places, 4/101 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 104 ms. Remains : 4/101 places, 4/101 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 113 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-12
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 27 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 38 ms.
Computed a total of 4 stabilizing places and 4 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 4 transition count 4
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X p0), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 8 factoid took 20 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-12 finished in 343 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(p0)&&F(G(p1)))))'
Support contains 3 out of 101 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 101/101 places, 101/101 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 100 edges and 101 vertex of which 3 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 98 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 98 places :
Also discarding 98 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 98 transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 2 ms. Remains 3 /101 variables (removed 98) and now considering 3/101 (removed 98) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 3 rows 3 cols
[2024-05-26 05:10:23] [INFO ] Computed 0 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-26 05:10:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 16 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 05:10:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 05:10:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 17 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 35 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-26 05:10:23] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 2 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-26 05:10:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/5 variables, 2/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/6 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 1/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/6 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 6/6 variables, and 6 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 39 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/5 variables, 2/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 2/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/6 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/6 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 6/6 variables, and 8 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 37 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 80ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 80ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 3/101 places, 3/101 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 122 ms. Remains : 3/101 places, 3/101 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 117 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-13
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 27264 reset in 83 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 27249 reset in 79 ms.
Computed a total of 3 stabilizing places and 3 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 3 transition count 3
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p1), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (F (G p0)), (F (G p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0)), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 18 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-13 finished in 466 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((p0||((F(p1) U p2) U (G((F(p1) U p2))||(!p2&&(F(p1) U p2)))))))'
Support contains 2 out of 101 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 101/101 places, 101/101 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 100 edges and 101 vertex of which 3 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 98 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 98 places :
Also discarding 98 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 98 transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 3 ms. Remains 3 /101 variables (removed 98) and now considering 3/101 (removed 98) transitions.
[2024-05-26 05:10:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 05:10:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 15 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 05:10:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 05:10:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 21 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 38 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-26 05:10:23] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 2 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-26 05:10:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/5 variables, 2/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/6 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 1/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/6 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 6/6 variables, and 6 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 28 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/5 variables, 2/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 2/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/6 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/6 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 6/6 variables, and 8 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 30 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 61ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 61ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 3/101 places, 3/101 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 109 ms. Remains : 3/101 places, 3/101 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 183 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (NOT p1), (NOT p2), (AND p0 (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-14
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 17 steps with 4 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-14 finished in 315 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G(F(p0))||G(!p1)))'
Support contains 1 out of 101 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 101/101 places, 101/101 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 100 edges and 101 vertex of which 1 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 100 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 100 places :
Also discarding 100 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 100 transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 1 ms. Remains 1 /101 variables (removed 100) and now considering 1/101 (removed 100) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1 rows 1 cols
[2024-05-26 05:10:23] [INFO ] Computed 0 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-26 05:10:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 20 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 05:10:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 05:10:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 22 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 43 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-26 05:10:24] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 0 sub problems to find dead transitions.
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 0ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 1/101 places, 1/101 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 52 ms. Remains : 1/101 places, 1/101 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 112 ms :[(AND p1 (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-15
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 47 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 41 ms.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 1 transition count 1
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 (NOT p0)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (NOT p1)), (X p0), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X p0)), (F (G (NOT p1))), (F (G p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 20 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property Referendum-PT-0100-LTLFireability-15 finished in 315 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 45880 ms.
BK_STOP 1716700224624
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="Referendum-PT-0100"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is Referendum-PT-0100, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r312-tall-171662338900612"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/Referendum-PT-0100.tgz
mv Referendum-PT-0100 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;