fond
Model Checking Contest 2024
14th edition, Geneva, Switzerland, June 25, 2024
Execution of r312-tall-171662337700058
Last Updated
July 7, 2024

About the Execution of ITS-Tools for QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
297.743 11642.00 20840.00 145.50 TFTTFFFFFFFTFTFF normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r312-tall-171662337700058.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r312-tall-171662337700058
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 520K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.0K Apr 13 03:45 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 88K Apr 13 03:45 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.3K Apr 13 03:44 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 41K Apr 13 03:44 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K Apr 23 07:44 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 23K Apr 23 07:44 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.0K Apr 23 07:44 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K Apr 23 07:44 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Apr 13 03:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 158K Apr 13 03:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.3K Apr 13 03:46 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 31K Apr 13 03:46 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.9K Apr 23 07:44 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.3K Apr 23 07:44 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 58K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-12
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-13
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-14
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716663601123

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-25 19:00:02] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-25 19:00:02] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-25 19:00:02] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 53 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:02] [INFO ] Transformed 86 places.
[2024-05-25 19:00:02] [INFO ] Transformed 56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:00:02] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-25 19:00:02] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 86 places and 56 transitions and 223 arcs in 145 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 12 ms.
Support contains 70 out of 86 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 86/86 places, 56/56 transitions.
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 76 transition count 56
Applied a total of 10 rules in 33 ms. Remains 76 /86 variables (removed 10) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 76 cols
[2024-05-25 19:00:02] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 13 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 174 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 19:00:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:00:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 77 ms returned [43]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 283 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 75/86 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 75 /75 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 334 ms. Remains : 75/86 places, 56/56 transitions.
Support contains 70 out of 75 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-25 19:00:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 39 to 38
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (6563 resets) in 1852 ms. (21 steps per ms) remains 26/38 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (94 resets) in 31 ms. (125 steps per ms) remains 23/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (222 resets) in 29 ms. (133 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (216 resets) in 29 ms. (133 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (224 resets) in 62 ms. (63 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (217 resets) in 77 ms. (51 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (219 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (105 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 22/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (98 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 20/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (221 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (100 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (223 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (226 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (98 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (106 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (102 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (102 resets) in 27 ms. (142 steps per ms) remains 5/20 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 75 cols
[2024-05-25 19:00:03] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 3 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 9/41 variables, 6/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 52/93 variables, 41/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp0 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp6 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 38/131 variables, 34/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 11/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/131 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 131/131 variables, and 96 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved in 186 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 75/75 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/21 variables, 2/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 38/59 variables, 21/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 50/109 variables, 38/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 11/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 3/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 17/126 variables, 13/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 4/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 5/131 variables, 3/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/131 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 131/131 variables, and 99 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved in 192 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 75/75 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 419ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 3 unsolved
Finished Parikh walk after 26 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=26 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Parikh walk visited 3 properties in 10 ms.
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-25 19:00:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
Computed a total of 75 stabilizing places and 56 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 75 transition count 56
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 75/75 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 75 /75 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:00:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:00:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 19:00:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:00:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 81 ms returned [43, 49]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 140 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 73/75 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 73 /73 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 145 ms. Remains : 73/75 places, 56/56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:00:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:00:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2721547687098804204.gal : 6 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13262090299661627232.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2721547687098804204.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13262090299661627232.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1029,0.035379,4640,2,1754,5,5458,6,0,341,3956,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EX(E(AG((((s4_0>=1)||(s4_2>=1))||(s4_1>=1))) U EG(((((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(Sstart_1>=1))||((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(Sstart_0>=1...206
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(E(!(E(TRUE U !((((s4_0>=1)||(s4_2>=1))||(s4_1>=1))))) U EG(((((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(Sstart_...263
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t34,...309
(forward)formula 0,0,0.33403,20052,1,0,180,78513,144,63,2223,71883,157
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 75/75 places, 56/56 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 133 edges and 75 vertex of which 23 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 52 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 52 places :
Also discarding 22 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 22 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 14 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 14 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 22 transition count 19
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 22 transition count 19
Applied a total of 16 rules in 22 ms. Remains 22 /75 variables (removed 53) and now considering 19/56 (removed 37) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 19 rows 22 cols
[2024-05-25 19:00:05] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 19:00:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:00:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 40 ms returned [10, 14, 15]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 78 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 19/75 places, 19/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 19 /19 variables (removed 0) and now considering 19/19 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 101 ms. Remains : 19/75 places, 19/56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:00:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 19 transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:00:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11015957192490572515.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16657700585208136815.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11015957192490572515.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16657700585208136815.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,148,0.009737,3452,2,159,5,573,6,0,90,385,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((((a3<1)||(n4_1<1))||((n4_2<1)||(n4_0<1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(((a3<1)||(n4_1<1))||((n4_2<1)||(n4_0<1))))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 13/0/6
(forward)formula 0,1,0.025206,4032,1,0,20,4010,18,4,455,3109,17
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 75/75 places, 56/56 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 133 edges and 75 vertex of which 71 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 4 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 4 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Applied a total of 1 rules in 4 ms. Remains 70 /75 variables (removed 5) and now considering 53/56 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 53 rows 70 cols
[2024-05-25 19:00:05] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 149 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 19:00:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:00:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 171 ms returned [42, 48, 53, 59, 60]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 344 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 65/75 places, 53/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 65 /65 variables (removed 0) and now considering 53/53 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 352 ms. Remains : 65/75 places, 53/56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:00:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 53 transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:00:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability861858777326374505.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6347750616820363801.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability861858777326374505.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6347750616820363801.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,463,0.021,4400,2,1158,5,4391,6,0,307,3146,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((EG((a2<1)) + ((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(c1_0>=1))) + (((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(c1_2>=1))||((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(c1_1>=1)))...157
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((EG((a2<1)) + ((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(c1_0>=1))) + (((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(c1_2>=1))||((m...202
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33...300
dead was empty
(forward)formula 0,1,0.229304,15488,1,0,228,65504,129,95,1880,54257,213
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 75/75 places, 56/56 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 133 edges and 75 vertex of which 71 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 4 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 4 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Applied a total of 1 rules in 14 ms. Remains 70 /75 variables (removed 5) and now considering 53/56 (removed 3) transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:00:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:00:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 19:00:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:00:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 81 ms returned [42, 48, 53, 59, 60]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 138 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 65/75 places, 53/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 65 /65 variables (removed 0) and now considering 53/53 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 155 ms. Remains : 65/75 places, 53/56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:00:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 53 transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:00:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12841138997136670592.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1208005172912969569.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12841138997136670592.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1208005172912969569.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,463,0.021832,4400,2,1158,5,4391,6,0,307,3146,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG((!(A(((((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(Sstart_1>=1))||((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(Sstart_0>=1)))||((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(Sstart_2>...297
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG((!(!((E(!(((((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(c1_0>=1))||((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(c1_2>=1)))||((mal...609
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33...300
(forward)formula 0,0,0.24039,15748,1,0,229,65602,137,98,1975,56615,221
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 75/75 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 75 /75 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 75 cols
[2024-05-25 19:00:06] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 19:00:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:00:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 49 ms returned [43, 49]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 90 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 73/75 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 73 /73 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 92 ms. Remains : 73/75 places, 56/56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:00:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:00:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15244318738016192280.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4394220982711508474.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15244318738016192280.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4394220982711508474.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1029,0.02714,4708,2,1754,5,5458,6,0,341,3956,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(((EF(((((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(Sstart_1>=1))||((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(Sstart_0>=1)))||((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(Sstart_2>=1)...1874
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(!((E(!(!(((!(EX(((((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(s4_2>=1))||((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(s4_0>=1)))|...3213
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t34,...309
(forward)formula 0,0,0.601251,29824,1,0,311,137785,175,156,2285,134842,304
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 75/75 places, 56/56 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 133 edges and 75 vertex of which 19 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 56 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 56 places :
Also discarding 24 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 24 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 14 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 14 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 19 transition count 18
Applied a total of 15 rules in 2 ms. Remains 19 /75 variables (removed 56) and now considering 18/56 (removed 38) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 19 cols
[2024-05-25 19:00:07] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 19:00:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:00:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 27 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 58 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-25 19:00:07] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 13 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:00:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 18/36 variables, 18/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/37 variables, 1/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/37 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 37/37 variables, and 21 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved in 132 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 19/19 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 18/36 variables, 18/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 13/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/37 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/37 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 37/37 variables, and 34 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved in 163 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 19/19 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 310ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 310ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 19/75 places, 18/56 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 376 ms. Remains : 19/75 places, 18/56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:00:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 18 transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:00:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1479797552918583903.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9797238483587003430.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1479797552918583903.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9797238483587003430.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,123,0.00407,3436,2,144,5,546,6,0,89,384,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG(EF((a1>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U (a1>=1)))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, Intersection with reachable at each ste...212
(forward)formula 0,0,0.017522,4280,1,0,75,5146,60,29,551,4825,70
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 75/75 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 75 /75 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 75 cols
[2024-05-25 19:00:07] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 82 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 19:00:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:00:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 71 ms returned [43, 49]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 155 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 73/75 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 73 /73 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 158 ms. Remains : 73/75 places, 56/56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:00:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:00:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5832050254608949210.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6858906716252225123.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5832050254608949210.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6858906716252225123.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1029,0.027146,4708,2,1754,5,5458,6,0,341,3956,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(A(((EG((a2>=1)) + E(AG((a2>=1)) U ((a4>=1)||(Astart>=1)))) + !(AF(((((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(s4_2>=1))||((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&...316
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(!(EX(E((((a3>=1)||((s2_2>=1)&&(n3_2>=1)))||(((s2_1>=1)&&(n3_1>=1))||((s2_0>=1)&&(n3_0>=1)))) U (...610
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t34,...309
dead was empty
(forward)formula 0,0,0.582579,29900,1,0,358,142262,156,192,2184,141115,353
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 75/75 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 75 /75 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:00:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:00:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 19:00:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:00:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 62 ms returned [43, 49]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 106 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 73/75 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 73 /73 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 110 ms. Remains : 73/75 places, 56/56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:00:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:00:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13486085405399569933.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15227776642178006618.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13486085405399569933.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15227776642178006618.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1029,0.027047,4708,2,1754,5,5458,6,0,341,3956,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((A(AX(((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(c1_2>=1))) U (E((a4>=1) U ((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(s4_2>=1))) + ((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(s6_1>...277
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!((E(!((E((a4>=1) U ((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(s4_2>=1))) + ((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(s6_1>=1))))...588
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t34,...309
dead was empty
(forward)formula 0,0,0.587007,30552,1,0,321,149365,155,166,2178,142372,323
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 75/75 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 75 /75 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:00:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:00:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 19:00:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:00:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 67 ms returned [43, 49]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 117 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 73/75 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 73 /73 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 120 ms. Remains : 73/75 places, 56/56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:00:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:00:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5616518995159125460.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6127946018033764140.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5616518995159125460.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6127946018033764140.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1029,0.028097,4708,2,1754,5,5458,6,0,341,3956,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EG(AF((((a1>=1)&&(n2_0>=1))&&((n2_1>=1)&&(n2_2>=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!(EG(!((((a1>=1)&&(n2_0>=1))&&((n2_1>=1)&&(n2_2>=1)))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t34,...309
(forward)formula 0,0,0.458058,25476,1,0,249,115451,137,100,2127,109081,226
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 75/75 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 75 /75 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:00:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:00:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 19:00:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:00:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 58 ms returned [43]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 98 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 74/75 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 74 /74 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 105 ms. Remains : 74/75 places, 56/56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:00:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:00:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2373434531073115059.gal : 5 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12853792365062654395.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2373434531073115059.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12853792365062654395.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1029,0.027483,4712,2,1867,5,5678,6,0,344,3884,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((EX(AG((((n7_0_2>=1)&&(n7_2_2>=1))&&((n7_1_2>=1)&&(Cstart_2>=1))))) + ((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(s3_0>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((EX(!(E(TRUE U !((((n7_0_2>=1)&&(n7_2_2>=1))&&((n7_1_2>=1)&&(Cstart_2>=1))))))) + ((malicious_reser...187
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t34,...309
(forward)formula 0,0,0.437708,21824,1,0,227,86552,140,99,2174,80127,192
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 75/75 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 75 /75 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:00:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:00:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 19:00:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:00:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 64 ms returned [43, 49]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 121 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 73/75 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 73 /73 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 124 ms. Remains : 73/75 places, 56/56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:00:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:00:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14224761724660427393.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18419718197820692636.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14224761724660427393.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18419718197820692636.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1029,0.028543,4708,2,1754,5,5458,6,0,341,3956,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(!(A(AF(((Sstart_1>=1)&&(n1_1>=1))) U EX(((Sstart_1>=1)&&(n1_1>=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(!((E(!(EX(((Sstart_1>=1)&&(n1_1>=1)))) U (!(!(EG(!(((Sstart_1>=1)&&(n1_1>=1)))))) * !(EX(((Sstart...231
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t34,...309
dead was empty
(forward)formula 0,1,0.485496,26304,1,0,302,123431,137,154,2122,118577,298
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 75/75 places, 56/56 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 133 edges and 75 vertex of which 71 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 4 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 4 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 2 transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 8 ms. Remains 71 /75 variables (removed 4) and now considering 54/56 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 54 rows 71 cols
[2024-05-25 19:00:10] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 19:00:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:00:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned [42, 48]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 112 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 69/75 places, 54/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 69 /69 variables (removed 0) and now considering 54/54 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 122 ms. Remains : 69/75 places, 54/56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:00:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 54 transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:00:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9446387179288640034.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8214340904827102267.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9446387179288640034.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8214340904827102267.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,467,0.022549,4412,2,1372,5,4223,6,0,324,2843,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((Sstart_1>=1)&&(n1_1>=1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((Sstart_1>=1)&&(n1_1>=1))))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 51/0/3
(forward)formula 0,0,0.141758,10748,1,0,39,31801,19,4,1662,21088,36
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 75/75 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 75 /75 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 75 cols
[2024-05-25 19:00:11] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 19:00:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:00:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 64 ms returned [43, 49]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 118 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 73/75 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 73 /73 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 120 ms. Remains : 73/75 places, 56/56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:00:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:00:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10644476093076129350.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16151148150154572512.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10644476093076129350.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16151148150154572512.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1029,0.027061,4704,2,1754,5,5458,6,0,341,3956,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(((AG((((a1<1)||(n2_0<1))||((n2_1<1)||(n2_2<1)))) * ((((s5_1<1)||(n8_1_0<1))||((n8_1_1<1)||(n8_1_2<1)))||(s4_2<1))) * ((malicious_rese...269
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(TRUE U ((!(E(TRUE U !((((a1<1)||(n2_0<1))||((n2_1<1)||(n2_2<1)))))) * ((((s5_1<1)||(n8_1_0<1))||((...372
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t34,...309
(forward)formula 0,1,0.490194,27004,1,0,267,122201,145,124,2189,116646,235
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 75/75 places, 56/56 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 133 edges and 75 vertex of which 71 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 4 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 4 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Applied a total of 1 rules in 2 ms. Remains 70 /75 variables (removed 5) and now considering 53/56 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 53 rows 70 cols
[2024-05-25 19:00:11] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 19:00:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:00:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 63 ms returned [42, 48, 53, 59, 60]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 122 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 65/75 places, 53/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 65 /65 variables (removed 0) and now considering 53/53 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 126 ms. Remains : 65/75 places, 53/56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:00:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 53 transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:00:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7183471417442809447.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15256062101579806145.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7183471417442809447.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15256062101579806145.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,463,0.020772,4404,2,1158,5,4391,6,0,307,3146,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG(((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(s6_2>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(s6_2>=1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33...300
(forward)formula 0,0,0.153795,11532,1,0,163,39860,128,58,1918,32505,141
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 75/75 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 75 /75 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 75 cols
[2024-05-25 19:00:12] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 19:00:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:00:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 63 ms returned [49]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 121 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 74/75 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 74 /74 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 125 ms. Remains : 74/75 places, 56/56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:00:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:00:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6484586000007285685.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16966114904638980319.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6484586000007285685.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16966114904638980319.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1029,0.039394,4976,2,2179,5,6761,6,0,344,3468,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(!(AX(((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(Sstart_0>=1)))) U !(AF((EX(((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(s2_2>=1))) * (((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(c1_...227
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,!(!(!(EG(!((EX(((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(s2_2>=1))) * (((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(c1_1>=1))||((...636
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t34,...309
dead was empty
(forward)formula 0,0,0.529733,26024,1,0,198,112216,136,72,2192,87051,177
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2024-05-25 19:00:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 19:00:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Total runtime 10498 ms.

BK_STOP 1716663612765

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r312-tall-171662337700058"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02.tgz
mv QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;