About the Execution of ITS-Tools for QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
369.651 | 10950.00 | 25960.00 | 55.10 | TTFTTFTFTFFTTTTT | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r312-tall-171662337700057.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r312-tall-171662337700057
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 520K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.0K Apr 13 03:45 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 88K Apr 13 03:45 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.3K Apr 13 03:44 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 41K Apr 13 03:44 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K Apr 23 07:44 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 23K Apr 23 07:44 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.0K Apr 23 07:44 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K Apr 23 07:44 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Apr 13 03:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 158K Apr 13 03:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.3K Apr 13 03:46 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 31K Apr 13 03:46 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.9K Apr 23 07:44 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.3K Apr 23 07:44 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 58K May 18 16:43 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2024-12
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2024-13
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2024-14
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2024-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1716663579195
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-25 18:59:40] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-25 18:59:40] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-25 18:59:40] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 56 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:40] [INFO ] Transformed 86 places.
[2024-05-25 18:59:40] [INFO ] Transformed 56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 18:59:40] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-25 18:59:40] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 86 places and 56 transitions and 223 arcs in 146 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 16 ms.
Support contains 85 out of 86 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 86/86 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 86 /86 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 86 cols
[2024-05-25 18:59:40] [INFO ] Computed 31 invariants in 8 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 173 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 18:59:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 18:59:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 84 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 283 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 52 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-25 18:59:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 18/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 8/83 variables, 3/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
[2024-05-25 18:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 57 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-25 18:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 2/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 3/86 variables, 10/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
[2024-05-25 18:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 56/142 variables, 86/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/142 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 142/142 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved in 1487 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 86/86 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 18/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 8/83 variables, 3/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 2/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 3/86 variables, 10/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
[2024-05-25 18:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-25 18:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-25 18:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-25 18:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-25 18:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-25 18:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-25 18:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 7/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 56/142 variables, 86/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 52/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/142 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 142/142 variables, and 179 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved in 1402 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 86/86 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints]
After SMT, in 2945ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2956ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3269 ms. Remains : 86/86 places, 56/56 transitions.
Support contains 85 out of 86 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-25 18:59:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:43] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2024-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-25 18:59:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (6567 resets) in 3011 ms. (13 steps per ms) remains 67/88 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000 steps (264 resets) in 51 ms. (76 steps per ms) remains 67/67 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (226 resets) in 31 ms. (125 steps per ms) remains 67/67 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (231 resets) in 48 ms. (81 steps per ms) remains 67/67 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (224 resets) in 59 ms. (66 steps per ms) remains 67/67 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (225 resets) in 36 ms. (108 steps per ms) remains 67/67 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (218 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 67/67 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (229 resets) in 25 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 67/67 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (97 resets) in 46 ms. (85 steps per ms) remains 36/67 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (101 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (227 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (227 resets) in 35 ms. (111 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (228 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (220 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (227 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (173 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (228 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (219 resets) in 25 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (197 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (221 resets) in 28 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (224 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000 steps (264 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (173 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (219 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000 steps (216 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (230 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (221 resets) in 25 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (220 resets) in 85 ms. (46 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (103 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (160 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (218 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (221 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (219 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (221 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (224 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (217 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (221 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (222 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (232 resets) in 27 ms. (143 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
[2024-05-25 18:59:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Problem AtomicPropp0 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp12 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp28 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp55 is UNSAT
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 18/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 32 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp3 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp9 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp13 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp16 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp21 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp23 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp27 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp29 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 9/84 variables, 2/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 12 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 3/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 12 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 12 solved, 24 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp4 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp14 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp26 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 2/86 variables, 7/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 21 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp5 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp6 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp19 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp20 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp25 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp34 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp36 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp37 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp38 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp54 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp61 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp64 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp71 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp73 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp84 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp85 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 56/142 variables, 86/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 31 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 31 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/142 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 31 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 142/142 variables, and 117 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 31 solved, 5 unsolved in 410 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 86/86 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 36/36 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 31 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 31 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 28/37 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 31 solved, 5 unsolved
[2024-05-25 18:59:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-25 18:59:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-25 18:59:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 31 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 31 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 24/61 variables, 14/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 31 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 31 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 13/74 variables, 10/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 31 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 31 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 56/130 variables, 74/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 31 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 4/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 31 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 31 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 12/142 variables, 12/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 31 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 4/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 31 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 1/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 31 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 31 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/142 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 31 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 142/142 variables, and 125 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 31 solved, 5 unsolved in 260 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 86/86 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/36 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 681ms problems are : Problem set: 31 solved, 5 unsolved
Fused 5 Parikh solutions to 4 different solutions.
Finished Parikh walk after 1663 steps, including 60 resets, run visited all 5 properties in 19 ms. (steps per millisecond=87 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Parikh walk visited 5 properties in 23 ms.
Successfully simplified 31 atomic propositions for a total of 15 simplifications.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2024-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2024-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2024-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2024-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2024-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-25 18:59:46] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2024-05-25 18:59:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2024-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-25 18:59:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
Support contains 55 out of 86 places (down from 69) after GAL structural reductions.
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2024-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Computed a total of 86 stabilizing places and 56 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 86 transition count 56
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 86/86 places, 56/56 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 184 edges and 86 vertex of which 23 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 63 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 63 places :
Also discarding 22 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 22 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 14 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 14 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 22 transition count 19
Applied a total of 15 rules in 14 ms. Remains 22 /86 variables (removed 64) and now considering 19/56 (removed 37) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 19 rows 22 cols
[2024-05-25 18:59:46] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 25 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 18:59:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 18:59:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 30 ms returned [10, 14, 15]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 57 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 19/86 places, 19/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 19 /19 variables (removed 0) and now considering 19/19 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 73 ms. Remains : 19/86 places, 19/56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 18:59:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 19 transitions.
[2024-05-25 18:59:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4798839957830602512.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14109733510769707644.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4798839957830602512.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14109733510769707644.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,148,0.011499,3324,2,136,5,509,6,0,89,351,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AF((a3<=a2)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!((a3<=a2)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, Intersection with reachable at each step enab...206
(forward)formula 0,1,0.025183,3936,1,0,67,3998,61,24,543,3718,55
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2024-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 86/86 places, 56/56 transitions.
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 79 transition count 56
Applied a total of 7 rules in 2 ms. Remains 79 /86 variables (removed 7) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 79 cols
[2024-05-25 18:59:46] [INFO ] Computed 24 invariants in 5 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 18:59:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 18:59:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 89 ms returned [45, 46, 52]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 149 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 76/86 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 76 /76 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 153 ms. Remains : 76/86 places, 56/56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 18:59:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 18:59:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15250569238045219595.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9852489125634820551.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15250569238045219595.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9852489125634820551.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1029,0.033264,4992,2,2396,5,6803,6,0,349,5446,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((A((AstopAbort<=SstopAbort) U (((((n7_1_0+n7_2_0)+(n7_0_0+n7_0_2))+((n7_2_1+n7_1_1)+(n7_0_1+n7_2_2)))+n7_1_2)<=a5)) + (EF(EX(TRUE)) * ...289
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!((E(!((((((n7_1_0+n7_2_0)+(n7_0_0+n7_0_2))+((n7_2_1+n7_1_1)+(n7_0_1+n7_2_2)))+n7_1_2)<=a5)) U (!((A...535
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t34, t35...305
(forward)formula 0,1,0.559258,25924,1,0,300,105763,148,154,2619,100460,267
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2024-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 86/86 places, 56/56 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 184 edges and 86 vertex of which 77 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 9 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 9 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Applied a total of 1 rules in 6 ms. Remains 76 /86 variables (removed 10) and now considering 55/56 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 55 rows 76 cols
[2024-05-25 18:59:47] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 18:59:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 18:59:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 94 ms returned [44, 45, 51, 56, 62, 63]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 152 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 70/86 places, 55/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 70 /70 variables (removed 0) and now considering 55/55 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 161 ms. Remains : 70/86 places, 55/56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 18:59:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 55 transitions.
[2024-05-25 18:59:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14386596225310876217.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5175760102749512977.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14386596225310876217.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5175760102749512977.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1025,0.021088,4428,2,1271,5,4496,6,0,330,3155,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((((s4_0>0) + AF((n3_2<1))) + (EG((s3_0>AstopAbort)) * ((n9_1_1>n5_0)||(n3_0<1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(((s4_0>0) + !(EG(!((n3_2<1))))) + (EG((s3_0>AstopAbort)) * ((n9_1_1>n5_0)||(n3_0<1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33,...309
(forward)formula 0,1,0.188624,13404,1,0,226,49628,141,98,2052,41519,199
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2024-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 86/86 places, 56/56 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 184 edges and 86 vertex of which 73 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 13 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 13 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Applied a total of 1 rules in 9 ms. Remains 72 /86 variables (removed 14) and now considering 53/56 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 53 rows 72 cols
[2024-05-25 18:59:47] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 18:59:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 18:59:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 75 ms returned [42, 43, 49, 54, 60, 61]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 139 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 66/86 places, 53/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 66 /66 variables (removed 0) and now considering 53/53 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 151 ms. Remains : 66/86 places, 53/56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 18:59:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 53 transitions.
[2024-05-25 18:59:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2674333963365949523.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5867022866781680229.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2674333963365949523.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5867022866781680229.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,463,0.026493,4396,2,1182,5,4435,6,0,308,3197,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((s6_0>=1)&&((s3_1<1)||(SstopOK_0<1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((s6_0>=1)&&((s3_1<1)||(SstopOK_0<1)))))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 47/0/6
(forward)formula 0,0,0.13192,9676,1,0,38,27751,19,4,1570,17187,35
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2024-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 86/86 places, 56/56 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 184 edges and 86 vertex of which 77 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 9 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 9 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 76 transition count 55
Applied a total of 2 rules in 15 ms. Remains 76 /86 variables (removed 10) and now considering 55/56 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 55 rows 76 cols
[2024-05-25 18:59:47] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 18:59:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 18:59:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 66 ms returned [43, 44, 50, 55, 61, 62]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 112 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 70/86 places, 55/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 70 /70 variables (removed 0) and now considering 55/55 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 130 ms. Remains : 70/86 places, 55/56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 18:59:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 55 transitions.
[2024-05-25 18:59:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7861319118645593316.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14732966510124270315.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7861319118645593316.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14732966510124270315.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1025,0.029225,4700,2,2068,5,5669,6,0,326,4135,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(A((n8_1_1>n8_0_2) U AF(!((((AstopOK>=1)||(a3<=1))&&(n3_1>0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(!(!(EG(!(!((((AstopOK>=1)||(a3<=1))&&(n3_1>0))))))) U (!((n8_1_1>n8_0_2)) * !(!(EG(!(!((((AstopO...259
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t34...305
(forward)formula 0,1,0.328953,20072,1,0,224,81173,139,103,2037,71048,204
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2024-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 86/86 places, 56/56 transitions.
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 77 transition count 56
Applied a total of 9 rules in 5 ms. Remains 77 /86 variables (removed 9) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 77 cols
[2024-05-25 18:59:48] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 18:59:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 18:59:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 72 ms returned [44, 45]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 125 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 75/86 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 75 /75 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 132 ms. Remains : 75/86 places, 56/56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 18:59:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 18:59:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4382758644872755528.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15233837899797512951.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4382758644872755528.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15233837899797512951.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1029,0.026514,4712,2,1881,5,5442,6,0,345,3255,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(A(AF(((n6_2>=1)||(n2_1>=1))) U ((n8_1_2>=1) * (((AG((n7_0_0<=0)) + AG((CstopAbort<=0))) + (E(E((n5_0>=1) U (n9_0_0<=n8_1_2)) U ((Cstar...250
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([((FwdU(Init,!(((n8_1_2>=1) * (((!(E(TRUE U !((n7_0_0<=0)))) + !(E(TRUE U !((CstopAbort<=0))))) + (E(E((n5_0>...1023
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t34,...309
(forward)formula 0,1,0.602853,30580,1,0,327,140597,160,165,2240,136452,327
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2024-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 86/86 places, 56/56 transitions.
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 78 transition count 56
Applied a total of 8 rules in 3 ms. Remains 78 /86 variables (removed 8) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 78 cols
[2024-05-25 18:59:49] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 18:59:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 18:59:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 62 ms returned [43, 44, 50]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 118 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 75/86 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 75 /75 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 123 ms. Remains : 75/86 places, 56/56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 18:59:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 18:59:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10092883938439387561.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1589355042712677810.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10092883938439387561.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1589355042712677810.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1029,0.033953,4716,2,1945,5,5951,6,0,343,3992,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((EG((s6_0<1)) * EX(((n7_2_2<1)||(n7_2_0>n1_1)))) * ((((n3_2<1) + AG((a3<1))) + (!(A(((AstopOK>=1)||(n7_1_0<=a1)) U EG((n7_0_0<=s5_0))...251
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(((EY(Init) * (EG((s6_0<1)) * EX(((n7_2_2<1)||(n7_2_0>n1_1))))) * (((c1_1<1)||(AstopOK>n2_2))||((SstopOK_1>0)...920
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t34, t35...305
(forward)formula 0,1,0.460548,24280,1,0,257,108403,136,103,2150,96885,233
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2024-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 86/86 places, 56/56 transitions.
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 77 transition count 56
Applied a total of 9 rules in 3 ms. Remains 77 /86 variables (removed 9) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 77 cols
[2024-05-25 18:59:49] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 18:59:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 18:59:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 68 ms returned [44, 45]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 118 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 75/86 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 75 /75 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 122 ms. Remains : 75/86 places, 56/56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 18:59:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 18:59:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13908405951147918576.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17867948276198867638.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13908405951147918576.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17867948276198867638.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1029,0.02925,4712,2,2125,5,5912,6,0,345,3832,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((AG(EF((((n7_2_1>=1)&&(Cstart_2<=1))||(Sstart_0<=s5_2)))) * EF((CstopOK_1<=0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (((n7_2_1>=1)&&(Cstart_2<=1))||(Sstart_0<=s5_2)))))] = FALSE * [(EY(Init) * ...193
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t34,...304
(forward)formula 0,1,0.326831,20156,1,0,152,77495,134,63,2170,61904,130
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02-CTLCardinality-2024-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
[2024-05-25 18:59:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 18:59:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Total runtime 9769 ms.
BK_STOP 1716663590145
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r312-tall-171662337700057"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02.tgz
mv QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-02 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;