About the Execution of ITS-Tools for QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02
| Execution Summary | |||||
| Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
| 393.084 | 14673.00 | 29546.00 | 105.50 | TFTTFFFFTTFTTFTF | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r312-tall-171662337600002.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r312-tall-171662337600002
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 400K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.4K Apr 13 03:45 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 72K Apr 13 03:45 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.8K Apr 13 03:43 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 40K Apr 13 03:43 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.3K Apr 23 07:44 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K Apr 23 07:44 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.5K Apr 23 07:44 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Apr 23 07:44 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.1K Apr 13 03:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 75K Apr 13 03:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.2K Apr 13 03:46 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 54K Apr 13 03:46 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K Apr 23 07:44 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Apr 23 07:44 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 equiv_pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 34K May 18 16:43 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLFireability-2024-12
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLFireability-2024-13
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLFireability-2024-14
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLFireability-2024-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1716654854257
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is COL
CTLFireability COL
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-25 16:34:15] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-25 16:34:15] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-25 16:34:15] [INFO ] Detected file is not PT type :http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.axiom.locator.DefaultOMMetaFactoryLocator).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info.
[2024-05-25 16:34:15] [WARNING] Using fallBack plugin, rng conformance not checked
[2024-05-25 16:34:16] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (colored model parsed with PNMLFW) : 609 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:16] [INFO ] Imported 30 HL places and 26 HL transitions for a total of 86 PT places and 56.0 transition bindings in 18 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 14 ms.
[2024-05-25 16:34:16] [INFO ] Built PT skeleton of HLPN with 30 places and 26 transitions 77 arcs in 5 ms.
[2024-05-25 16:34:16] [INFO ] Skeletonized 16 HLPN properties in 2 ms.
Computed a total of 30 stabilizing places and 26 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 30 transition count 26
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
AF dead knowledge conclusive for 6 formulas.
Remains 10 properties that can be checked using skeleton over-approximation.
Computed a total of 30 stabilizing places and 26 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 30 transition count 26
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (5311 resets) in 1217 ms. (32 steps per ms) remains 2/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (2830 resets) in 312 ms. (127 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 21052 steps (948 resets) in 138 ms. (151 steps per ms) remains 0/2 properties
[2024-05-25 16:34:17] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2024-05-25 16:34:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:17] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLFireability-2024-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLFireability-2024-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-25 16:34:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Domain [tsid(3), tsid(3)] of place n9 breaks symmetries in sort tsid
[2024-05-25 16:34:17] [INFO ] Unfolded HLPN to a Petri net with 86 places and 56 transitions 223 arcs in 13 ms.
[2024-05-25 16:34:17] [INFO ] Unfolded 14 HLPN properties in 1 ms.
Support contains 76 out of 86 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 86/86 places, 56/56 transitions.
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 76 transition count 56
Applied a total of 10 rules in 13 ms. Remains 76 /86 variables (removed 10) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 76 cols
[2024-05-25 16:34:17] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 17 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 185 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 16:34:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 16:34:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 79 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 318 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 52 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:34:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 22/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 56/131 variables, 75/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 132/132 variables, and 98 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved in 1093 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 22/22 constraints, State Equation: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 22/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 56/131 variables, 75/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 52/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 132/132 variables, and 150 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved in 1034 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 22/22 constraints, State Equation: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2178ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2190ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 76/86 places, 56/56 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2533 ms. Remains : 76/86 places, 56/56 transitions.
Support contains 76 out of 76 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-25 16:34:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 34 to 31
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (6575 resets) in 806 ms. (49 steps per ms) remains 20/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (92 resets) in 117 ms. (33 steps per ms) remains 19/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (225 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 19/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (220 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 19/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (223 resets) in 25 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 19/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (99 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 19/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (106 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 19/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (226 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 19/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (105 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 17/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (221 resets) in 31 ms. (125 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (219 resets) in 32 ms. (121 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (217 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (222 resets) in 29 ms. (133 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (105 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (222 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (217 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (223 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000 steps (264 resets) in 27 ms. (142 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (220 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
[2024-05-25 16:34:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 22/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp0 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp27 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 55/129 variables, 74/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/132 variables, 2/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 15 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 132/132 variables, and 98 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 15 unsolved in 324 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 22/22 constraints, State Equation: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 2 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 18/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/63 variables, 2/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 52/115 variables, 63/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 13/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 17/132 variables, 13/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 2/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 2/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 15 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 132/132 variables, and 113 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 15 unsolved in 553 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 22/22 constraints, State Equation: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 15/17 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 894ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 15 unsolved
Fused 15 Parikh solutions to 13 different solutions.
Finished Parikh walk after 48 steps, including 1 resets, run visited all 6 properties in 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=24 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Parikh walk visited 15 properties in 178 ms.
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 14 simplifications.
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLFireability-2024-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-25 16:34:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
Computed a total of 76 stabilizing places and 56 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 76 transition count 56
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 76/76 places, 56/56 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 137 edges and 76 vertex of which 23 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 53 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 53 places :
Also discarding 22 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 22 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 14 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 14 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 22 transition count 19
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 22 transition count 19
Applied a total of 16 rules in 17 ms. Remains 22 /76 variables (removed 54) and now considering 19/56 (removed 37) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 19 rows 22 cols
[2024-05-25 16:34:21] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 16:34:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 16:34:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 40 ms returned [10, 11, 12]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 76 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 19/76 places, 19/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 19 /19 variables (removed 0) and now considering 19/19 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 95 ms. Remains : 19/76 places, 19/56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:34:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 19 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:34:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1745852586465719157.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17036260707160089982.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1745852586465719157.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17036260707160089982.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,148,0.016934,3340,2,159,5,573,6,0,90,385,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((((n4_0<1)||(n4_1<1))||((n4_2<1)||(a3<1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(((n4_0<1)||(n4_1<1))||((n4_2<1)||(a3<1))))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 13/0/6
(forward)formula 0,1,0.027986,3952,1,0,20,4010,18,4,455,3109,17
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLFireability-2024-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 76/76 places, 56/56 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 137 edges and 76 vertex of which 72 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 4 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 4 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Applied a total of 1 rules in 10 ms. Remains 71 /76 variables (removed 5) and now considering 53/56 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 53 rows 71 cols
[2024-05-25 16:34:21] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 16:34:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 16:34:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 70 ms returned [40, 41, 42, 46, 47, 48]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 127 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 65/76 places, 53/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 65 /65 variables (removed 0) and now considering 53/53 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 141 ms. Remains : 65/76 places, 53/56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:34:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 53 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:34:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7087002544483001345.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14302990659963179896.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7087002544483001345.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14302990659963179896.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,463,0.0209,4136,2,1190,5,3308,6,0,307,2014,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((EG((a2<1)) + ((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(c1_1>=1))) + (((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(c1_2>=1))||((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(c1_0>=1)))...157
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((EG((a2<1)) + ((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(c1_1>=1))) + (((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(c1_2>=1))||((m...202
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...290
dead was empty
(forward)formula 0,1,0.31126,16684,1,0,228,70097,129,95,1919,63455,213
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLFireability-2024-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 76/76 places, 56/56 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 137 edges and 76 vertex of which 72 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 4 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 4 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Applied a total of 1 rules in 4 ms. Remains 71 /76 variables (removed 5) and now considering 53/56 (removed 3) transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:34:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 16:34:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 16:34:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 16:34:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 65 ms returned [40, 41, 42, 46, 47, 48]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 128 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 65/76 places, 53/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 65 /65 variables (removed 0) and now considering 53/53 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 135 ms. Remains : 65/76 places, 53/56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:34:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 53 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:34:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1198410128383605103.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9986833913541817511.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1198410128383605103.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9986833913541817511.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,463,0.024692,4136,2,1190,5,3308,6,0,307,2014,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG((!(A(((((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(Sstart_0>=1))||((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(Sstart_1>=1)))||((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(Sstart_2>...297
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG((!(!((E(!(((((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(c1_1>=1))||((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(c1_2>=1)))||((mal...609
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...290
(forward)formula 0,0,0.288619,16760,1,0,229,69433,137,98,2009,63678,221
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLFireability-2024-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 76/76 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 76 /76 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 76 cols
[2024-05-25 16:34:22] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 16:34:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 16:34:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned [49, 50, 51]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 105 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 73/76 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 73 /73 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 108 ms. Remains : 73/76 places, 56/56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:34:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:34:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1599526416396668674.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7452806934527300121.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1599526416396668674.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7452806934527300121.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1029,0.021018,4180,2,1337,5,3810,6,0,341,2303,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(((EF(((((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(Sstart_0>=1))||((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(Sstart_1>=1)))||((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(Sstart_2>=1)...1820
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(!((E(!(!(((!(EX(((((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(s4_2>=1))||((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(s4_0>=1)))|...3087
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...300
(forward)formula 0,0,0.563894,25992,1,0,311,125152,175,156,2324,115901,304
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLFireability-2024-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 76/76 places, 56/56 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 137 edges and 76 vertex of which 12 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 64 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 64 places :
Also discarding 29 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 29 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 17 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 17 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 12 transition count 10
Applied a total of 18 rules in 1 ms. Remains 12 /76 variables (removed 64) and now considering 10/56 (removed 46) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 10 rows 12 cols
[2024-05-25 16:34:23] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 21 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 16:34:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 16:34:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 28 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 52 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-25 16:34:23] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 5 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:34:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 9/19 variables, 10/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/22 variables, 2/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/22 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 22/22 variables, and 14 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 49 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 12/12 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 9/19 variables, 10/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 5/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 3/22 variables, 2/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/22 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 22/22 variables, and 19 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 48 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 12/12 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 114ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 114ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 12/76 places, 10/56 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 176 ms. Remains : 12/76 places, 10/56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:34:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 0 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 10 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:34:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15478757272077998350.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7478991141394612104.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15478757272077998350.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7478991141394612104.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,63,0.002863,3364,2,59,5,213,6,0,54,165,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG(EF((a1>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U (a1>=1)))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t8, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse...182
(forward)formula 0,0,0.007704,3680,1,0,50,1422,44,21,321,1403,51
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLFireability-2024-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 76/76 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 76 /76 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 76 cols
[2024-05-25 16:34:23] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 16:34:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 16:34:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 77 ms returned [49, 50, 51]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 123 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 73/76 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 73 /73 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 125 ms. Remains : 73/76 places, 56/56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:34:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:34:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6532003093674164361.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12411984294879885829.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6532003093674164361.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12411984294879885829.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1029,0.021228,4176,2,1337,5,3810,6,0,341,2303,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(A(((EG((a2>=1)) + E(AG((a2>=1)) U ((a4>=1)||(Astart>=1)))) + !(AF(((((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(s4_2>=1))||((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&...316
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(!(EX(E((((a3>=1)||((n3_2>=1)&&(s2_2>=1)))||(((n3_1>=1)&&(s2_1>=1))||((n3_0>=1)&&(s2_0>=1)))) U (...610
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...300
dead was empty
(forward)formula 0,0,0.558598,26440,1,0,358,134527,156,192,2215,124030,353
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLFireability-2024-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 76/76 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 76 /76 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:34:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 16:34:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 16:34:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 16:34:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 85 ms returned [49, 50, 51]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 136 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 73/76 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 73 /73 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 138 ms. Remains : 73/76 places, 56/56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:34:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:34:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7809624801725677313.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6564250060903072835.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7809624801725677313.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6564250060903072835.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1029,0.026121,4180,2,1337,5,3810,6,0,341,2303,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((AX((a1>=1)) + ((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(Sstart_0>=1))) + (((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(Sstart_1>=1))||((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(S...170
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((!(EX(!((a1>=1)))) + ((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(Sstart_0>=1))) + (((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(Sstar...219
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...300
(forward)formula 0,1,0.277564,16572,1,0,200,66746,136,77,2150,58112,166
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLFireability-2024-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 76/76 places, 56/56 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 137 edges and 76 vertex of which 72 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 4 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 4 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Applied a total of 1 rules in 8 ms. Remains 71 /76 variables (removed 5) and now considering 53/56 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 53 rows 71 cols
[2024-05-25 16:34:24] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 16:34:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 16:34:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 67 ms returned [40, 41, 42, 46, 47, 48]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 119 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 65/76 places, 53/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 65 /65 variables (removed 0) and now considering 53/53 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 130 ms. Remains : 65/76 places, 53/56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:34:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 53 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:34:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14926554564700982048.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15755901761461465756.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14926554564700982048.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15755901761461465756.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,463,0.018647,4140,2,1190,5,3308,6,0,307,2014,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((((s4_1<1)&&(s4_0<1))&&(s4_2<1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(((s4_1<1)&&(s4_0<1))&&(s4_2<1)))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 44/18/9
(forward)formula 0,1,0.124677,9420,1,0,38,25340,18,4,1606,17691,35
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLFireability-2024-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 76/76 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 76 /76 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 76 cols
[2024-05-25 16:34:24] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 16:34:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 16:34:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 63 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 123 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 52 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:34:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 22/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 56/131 variables, 75/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 132/132 variables, and 98 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved in 822 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 22/22 constraints, State Equation: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 22/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 56/131 variables, 75/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 52/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 132/132 variables, and 150 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved in 974 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 22/22 constraints, State Equation: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1812ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1814ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1941 ms. Remains : 76/76 places, 56/56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:34:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:34:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15981639650730910803.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability181561234848782907.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15981639650730910803.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability181561234848782907.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1029,0.02146,4192,2,1398,5,3807,6,0,350,2201,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AG(A(AG((((((n7_1>=1)&&(n7_4>=1))&&((n7_7>=1)&&(Cstart_1>=1)))||(((n7_0>=1)&&(n7_3>=1))&&((n7_6>=1)&&(Cstart_0>=1))))||(((n7_2>=1)&&(n...278
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((FwdU(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE),!(!(E(TRUE U !(((((n3_2>=1)&&(s2_2>=1))||((n3_1>=1)&&(s2_1>=1)))||((n3_0>=1)&&...587
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...300
(forward)formula 0,0,0.320408,17260,1,0,180,67948,137,63,2325,57446,159
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLFireability-2024-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 76/76 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 76 /76 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:34:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 16:34:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 16:34:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 16:34:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 74 ms returned [49, 50, 51]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 128 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 73/76 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 73 /73 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 131 ms. Remains : 73/76 places, 56/56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:34:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:34:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10802063459112581896.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability534763263661088229.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10802063459112581896.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability534763263661088229.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1029,0.021667,4180,2,1337,5,3810,6,0,341,2303,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EX(AF((a2<1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(EG(!((a2<1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...300
(forward)formula 0,1,0.251347,15268,1,0,175,59638,134,60,2107,47974,148
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLFireability-2024-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 76/76 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 76 /76 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:34:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 16:34:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 16:34:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 16:34:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 59 ms returned [49, 50, 51]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 106 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 73/76 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 73 /73 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 109 ms. Remains : 73/76 places, 56/56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:34:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:34:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13154430045679932922.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6998801390421629840.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13154430045679932922.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6998801390421629840.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1029,0.030282,4440,2,1337,5,3810,6,0,341,2303,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((EG(AX(((a5<1)&&(((n4_0<1)||(n4_1<1))||((n4_2<1)||(a3<1)))))) + EG(AX(((((malicious_reservoir<1)||(Sstart_0<1))&&((malicious_reservoi...531
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(EX(!(((a5<1)&&(((n4_0<1)||(n4_1<1))||((n4_2<1)||(a3<1))))))))] != FALSE + [FwdG(FwdU(I...897
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...300
(forward)formula 0,1,0.309661,17204,1,0,183,72356,134,65,2158,59415,154
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLFireability-2024-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 76/76 places, 56/56 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 137 edges and 76 vertex of which 34 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 42 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 42 places :
Also discarding 15 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 15 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 33 transition count 29
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 33 transition count 29
Applied a total of 13 rules in 9 ms. Remains 33 /76 variables (removed 43) and now considering 29/56 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 29 rows 33 cols
[2024-05-25 16:34:27] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 16:34:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 16:34:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 35 ms returned [16, 17, 18]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 66 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 30/76 places, 29/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 29/29 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 77 ms. Remains : 30/76 places, 29/56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:34:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 29 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:34:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality14859275090121883555.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality8277638875679342304.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality14859275090121883555.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality8277638875679342304.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-reach command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...329
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality8277638875679342304.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 4
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :4 after 32
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :32 after 78
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :78 after 96
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
petri\_inst\_inst,238,0.016415,3592,2,304,9,1121,7,0,143,814,0
Total reachable state count : 238
Verifying 1 reachability properties.
Reachability property QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLFireability-2024-14 is true.
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLFireability-2024-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL COLLATERAL_PROCESSING
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLFireability-2024-14,2,0.016921,3952,2,31,9,1121,7,0,150,814,0
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
RANDOM walk for 36335 steps (6546 resets) in 394 ms. (91 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 76/76 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 76 /76 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 76 cols
[2024-05-25 16:34:28] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 16:34:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 16:34:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 59 ms returned [49, 50, 51]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 101 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 73/76 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 73 /73 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 102 ms. Remains : 73/76 places, 56/56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:34:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:34:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2281227575492576676.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6313372212308350248.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2281227575492576676.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6313372212308350248.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1029,0.022529,4440,2,1337,5,3810,6,0,341,2303,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(((((n2_0>=1)&&(n2_1>=1))&&((n2_2>=1)&&(a1>=1))) * (E(AX((((((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(s2_2>=1))||((malicious_reservoir>=1)&&(s2_0>=1)...871
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !((((n2_0>=1)&&(n2_1>=1))&&((n2_2>=1)&&(a1>=1)))))] = FALSE * ((([((EY(Init) * !(E(!(EX(!((((((mal...2916
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...300
(forward)formula 0,0,0.527324,24292,1,0,278,111160,157,118,2234,101172,257
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLFireability-2024-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2024-05-25 16:34:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 16:34:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Total runtime 13378 ms.
BK_STOP 1716654868930
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r312-tall-171662337600002"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02.tgz
mv QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;