About the Execution of GreatSPN+red for QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
394.779 | 9023.00 | 24491.00 | 43.30 | TTFTTFTFTTTTTTFT | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r311-tall-171662335600001.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool greatspnxred
Input is QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r311-tall-171662335600001
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 400K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.4K Apr 13 03:45 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 72K Apr 13 03:45 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.8K Apr 13 03:43 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 40K Apr 13 03:43 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.3K Apr 23 07:44 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K Apr 23 07:44 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.5K Apr 23 07:44 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Apr 23 07:44 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.1K Apr 13 03:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 75K Apr 13 03:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.2K Apr 13 03:46 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 54K Apr 13 03:46 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K Apr 23 07:44 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Apr 23 07:44 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 equiv_pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 34K May 18 16:43 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLCardinality-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLCardinality-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLCardinality-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLCardinality-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLCardinality-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLCardinality-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLCardinality-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLCardinality-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLCardinality-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLCardinality-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLCardinality-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLCardinality-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLCardinality-2024-12
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLCardinality-2024-13
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLCardinality-2024-14
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLCardinality-2024-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1716646320214
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=greatspnxred
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Applying reductions before tool greatspn
Invoking reducer
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-25 14:12:01] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -timeout, 360, -rebuildPNML]
[2024-05-25 14:12:01] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-25 14:12:01] [INFO ] Detected file is not PT type :http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.axiom.locator.DefaultOMMetaFactoryLocator).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info.
[2024-05-25 14:12:01] [WARNING] Using fallBack plugin, rng conformance not checked
[2024-05-25 14:12:02] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (colored model parsed with PNMLFW) : 577 ms
[2024-05-25 14:12:02] [INFO ] Imported 30 HL places and 26 HL transitions for a total of 86 PT places and 56.0 transition bindings in 17 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 21 ms.
[2024-05-25 14:12:02] [INFO ] Built PT skeleton of HLPN with 30 places and 26 transitions 77 arcs in 4 ms.
[2024-05-25 14:12:02] [INFO ] Skeletonized 16 HLPN properties in 2 ms.
Computed a total of 30 stabilizing places and 26 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 30 transition count 26
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Remains 16 properties that can be checked using skeleton over-approximation.
Computed a total of 30 stabilizing places and 26 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 30 transition count 26
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
RANDOM walk for 40002 steps (5326 resets) in 2289 ms. (17 steps per ms) remains 53/85 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (346 resets) in 147 ms. (27 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (277 resets) in 121 ms. (32 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (278 resets) in 104 ms. (38 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (283 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (273 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (180 resets) in 21 ms. (182 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (178 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (283 resets) in 50 ms. (78 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (284 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (277 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (297 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (285 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (284 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (282 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (294 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (220 resets) in 27 ms. (142 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (278 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (279 resets) in 57 ms. (69 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (347 resets) in 28 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (284 resets) in 28 ms. (137 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (347 resets) in 45 ms. (86 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (280 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (271 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (278 resets) in 27 ms. (142 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (283 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (284 resets) in 28 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (347 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (287 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (346 resets) in 46 ms. (85 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000 steps (283 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (155 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000 steps (295 resets) in 34 ms. (114 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (280 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (280 resets) in 27 ms. (142 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000 steps (289 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (280 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (284 resets) in 34 ms. (114 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (273 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (277 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (279 resets) in 40 ms. (97 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (344 resets) in 34 ms. (114 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (278 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (279 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (285 resets) in 39 ms. (100 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (284 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (177 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (364 resets) in 32 ms. (121 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (216 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (274 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 53/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (37 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 52/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (285 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (280 resets) in 27 ms. (142 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (280 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 52/52 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 26 rows 30 cols
[2024-05-25 14:12:03] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 6 ms
Problem AtomicPropp0 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp12 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp28 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp30 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp31 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp42 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp63 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp65 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp72 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 43 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp3 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp4 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp9 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp13 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp14 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp16 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp21 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp23 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp26 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp27 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp29 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp34 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp39 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp41 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp44 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp48 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp55 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp56 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp59 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp61 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp64 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp74 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp77 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp78 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp81 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp82 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp84 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/30 variables, 4/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 36 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 36 solved, 16 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp5 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp6 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp19 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp20 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp25 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp36 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp37 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp38 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp43 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp54 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp62 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp66 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp67 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp68 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp70 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 26/56 variables, 30/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 51 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 51 solved, 1 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/56 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 51 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 56/56 variables, and 35 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 51 solved, 1 unsolved in 451 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 51 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 51 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 15/21 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 51 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 51 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/23 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 51 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 51 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp79 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 49/56 variables, and 28 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 52 solved, 0 unsolved in 56 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 23/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/52 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 563ms problems are : Problem set: 52 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 52 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLCardinality-2024-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLCardinality-2024-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLCardinality-2024-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLCardinality-2024-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-25 14:12:04] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 2 formulas.
[2024-05-25 14:12:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2024-05-25 14:12:04] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLCardinality-2024-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLCardinality-2024-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLCardinality-2024-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-25 14:12:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Domain [tsid(3), tsid(3)] of place n9 breaks symmetries in sort tsid
[2024-05-25 14:12:04] [INFO ] Unfolded HLPN to a Petri net with 86 places and 56 transitions 223 arcs in 12 ms.
[2024-05-25 14:12:04] [INFO ] Unfolded 9 HLPN properties in 0 ms.
Support contains 86 out of 86 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 86/86 places, 56/56 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 86 /86 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 86 cols
[2024-05-25 14:12:04] [INFO ] Computed 31 invariants in 12 ms
[2024-05-25 14:12:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 14:12:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 14:12:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 66 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 133 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 52 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-25 14:12:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 18/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 11/86 variables, 7/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 6/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 56/142 variables, 86/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/142 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 142/142 variables, and 117 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved in 931 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 24/24 constraints, State Equation: 86/86 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 18/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 11/86 variables, 7/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 6/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
[2024-05-25 14:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 50 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-25 14:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-25 14:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-25 14:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-25 14:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-25 14:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 6/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 56/142 variables, 86/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 52/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/142 variables, 0/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 142/142 variables, and 175 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved in 1301 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 24/24 constraints, State Equation: 86/86 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 2260ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2262ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2412 ms. Remains : 86/86 places, 56/56 transitions.
Support contains 86 out of 86 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-25 14:12:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-25 14:12:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-25 14:12:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (6567 resets) in 2040 ms. (19 steps per ms) remains 45/60 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000 steps (264 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 45/45 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (230 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 45/45 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (104 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 45/45 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (224 resets) in 29 ms. (133 steps per ms) remains 45/45 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (104 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 45/45 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (220 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 45/45 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (229 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 45/45 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (223 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 45/45 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (218 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 45/45 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (232 resets) in 25 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 45/45 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (230 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 45/45 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (223 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 45/45 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (225 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 45/45 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (226 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 45/45 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (227 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 45/45 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (228 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 45/45 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000 steps (264 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 45/45 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (232 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 45/45 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000 steps (264 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 45/45 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (229 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 45/45 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (157 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 41/45 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (216 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 41/41 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000 steps (264 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 41/41 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (224 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 41/41 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (224 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 41/41 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (225 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 41/41 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (228 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 41/41 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (213 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 41/41 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (227 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 41/41 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (219 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 41/41 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (227 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 41/41 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (221 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 41/41 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (221 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 41/41 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (224 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 41/41 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (96 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 35/41 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (155 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (226 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (33 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 32/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (217 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (222 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (222 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
[2024-05-25 14:12:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Problem AtomicPropp0 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp7 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp12 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp23 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp47 is UNSAT
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 14/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 27 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp4 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp8 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp11 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp15 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp20 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp22 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp25 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp29 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp36 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp37 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp40 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp49 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp52 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp56 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp57 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp59 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 11/77 variables, 6/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 21 solved, 11 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp9 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp53 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 6/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 23 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 23 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 3/80 variables, 2/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 23 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 23 solved, 9 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp17 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp18 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp19 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp24 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp35 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp42 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp43 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp45 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 56/136 variables, 80/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 31 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 31 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 6/142 variables, 6/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 31 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 2/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 31 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 31 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/142 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 31 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 142/142 variables, and 117 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 31 solved, 1 unsolved in 235 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 24/24 constraints, State Equation: 86/86 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 32/32 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 31 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 31 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 31/47 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 31 solved, 1 unsolved
[2024-05-25 14:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-25 14:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 2/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 31 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 31 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 6/53 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 31 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 6/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 31 solved, 1 unsolved
[2024-05-25 14:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-25 14:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 2/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 31 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 31 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 15/68 variables, 12/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 31 solved, 1 unsolved
[2024-05-25 14:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-25 14:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-25 14:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 3/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 31 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 31 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp54 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 124/142 variables, and 100 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 32 solved, 0 unsolved in 268 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/24 constraints, State Equation: 68/86 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/32 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 534ms problems are : Problem set: 32 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 32 atomic propositions for a total of 9 simplifications.
[2024-05-25 14:12:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-25 14:12:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-25 14:12:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
Support contains 79 out of 86 places (down from 85) after GAL structural reductions.
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLCardinality-2024-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLCardinality-2024-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Computed a total of 86 stabilizing places and 56 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 86 transition count 56
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 86/86 places, 56/56 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 184 edges and 86 vertex of which 23 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 63 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 63 places :
Also discarding 22 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 22 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 14 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 14 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 22 transition count 19
Applied a total of 15 rules in 16 ms. Remains 22 /86 variables (removed 64) and now considering 19/56 (removed 37) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 16 ms. Remains : 22/86 places, 19/56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 14:12:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 14:12:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 14:12:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 19 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 86/86 places, 56/56 transitions.
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 79 transition count 56
Applied a total of 7 rules in 2 ms. Remains 79 /86 variables (removed 7) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 79/86 places, 56/56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 14:12:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 14:12:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 14:12:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 86/86 places, 56/56 transitions.
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 79 transition count 56
Applied a total of 7 rules in 1 ms. Remains 79 /86 variables (removed 7) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1 ms. Remains : 79/86 places, 56/56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 14:12:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 14:12:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 14:12:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 86/86 places, 56/56 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 184 edges and 86 vertex of which 23 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 63 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 63 places :
Also discarding 22 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 22 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 14 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 14 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 23 transition count 20
Applied a total of 15 rules in 3 ms. Remains 23 /86 variables (removed 63) and now considering 20/56 (removed 36) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3 ms. Remains : 23/86 places, 20/56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 14:12:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-25 14:12:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 14:12:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 20 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 86/86 places, 56/56 transitions.
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 78 transition count 56
Applied a total of 8 rules in 2 ms. Remains 78 /86 variables (removed 8) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 78/86 places, 56/56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 14:12:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 14:12:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 14:12:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 86/86 places, 56/56 transitions.
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 79 transition count 56
Applied a total of 7 rules in 1 ms. Remains 79 /86 variables (removed 7) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1 ms. Remains : 79/86 places, 56/56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 14:12:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 14:12:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 14:12:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 86/86 places, 56/56 transitions.
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 79 transition count 56
Applied a total of 7 rules in 2 ms. Remains 79 /86 variables (removed 7) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 79/86 places, 56/56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 14:12:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 14:12:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 14:12:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
[2024-05-25 14:12:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-25 14:12:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 14:12:08] [INFO ] Export to MCC of 7 properties in file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.sr.xml took 1 ms.
[2024-05-25 14:12:08] [INFO ] Export to PNML in file /home/mcc/execution/model.sr.pnml of net with 86 places, 56 transitions and 223 arcs took 1 ms.
Total runtime 7026 ms.
There are residual formulas that ITS could not solve within timeout
----------------------------------------------------------------------
GreatSPN-meddly tool, MCC 2023
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Running QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02
IS_COLORED=
IS_NUPN=
LOADING PETRI NET FILE /home/mcc/execution/413/model.pnml (PNML) ...
PNML VERSION 2009, P/T NET.
COLOR CLASSES: 0
CONSTANTS: 0
PLACES: 86
TRANSITIONS: 56
COLOR VARS: 0
MEASURES: 0
LOADING TIME: [User 0.003s, Sys 0.000s]
SAVING FILE /home/mcc/execution/413/model (.net / .def) ...
EXPORT TIME: [User 0.000s, Sys 0.000s]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
GreatSPN/Meddly.
Copyright (C) 1987-2022, University of Torino, Italy.
website: https://github.com/greatspn/SOURCES
Based on MEDDLY version 0.16.0
Copyright (C) 2009, Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc.
website: http://meddly.sourceforge.net
Process ID: 587
MODEL NAME: /home/mcc/execution/413/model
86 places, 56 transitions.
Creating all event NSFs..
Creating all event NSFs..
Creating all event NSFs..
Creating all event NSFs..
Split: SplitSubtract
Start RS construction.
Split: SplitSubtract
Start RS construction.
Split: SplitSubtract
Start RS construction.
Split: SplitSubtract
Start RS construction.
Building monolithic NSF...
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLCardinality-2024-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS PARALLEL_PROCESSING UNFOLDING_TO_PT USE_NUPN TOPOLOGICAL
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLCardinality-2024-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS PARALLEL_PROCESSING UNFOLDING_TO_PT USE_NUPN TOPOLOGICAL
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLCardinality-2024-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS PARALLEL_PROCESSING UNFOLDING_TO_PT USE_NUPN TOPOLOGICAL
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLCardinality-2024-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS PARALLEL_PROCESSING UNFOLDING_TO_PT USE_NUPN TOPOLOGICAL
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLCardinality-2024-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS PARALLEL_PROCESSING UNFOLDING_TO_PT USE_NUPN TOPOLOGICAL
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLCardinality-2024-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS PARALLEL_PROCESSING UNFOLDING_TO_PT USE_NUPN TOPOLOGICAL
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02-CTLCardinality-2024-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS PARALLEL_PROCESSING UNFOLDING_TO_PT USE_NUPN TOPOLOGICAL
Ok.
EXITCODE: 0
----------------------------------------------------------------------
BK_STOP 1716646329237
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -timeout 360 -rebuildPNML
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="greatspnxred"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool greatspnxred"
echo " Input is QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r311-tall-171662335600001"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02.tgz
mv QuasiCertifProtocol-COL-02 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;