About the Execution of GreatSPN+red for PolyORBLF-COL-S06J04T06
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
327.388 | 7674.00 | 17190.00 | 39.90 | F | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r298-tajo-171654454900113.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file='/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2' backing_fmt='qcow2' encryption=off cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
......................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool greatspnxred
Input is PolyORBLF-COL-S06J04T06, examination is StableMarking
Time confinement is 1800 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r298-tajo-171654454900113
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 560K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.3K Apr 11 16:56 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 90K Apr 11 16:56 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K Apr 11 16:51 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 58K Apr 11 16:51 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K Apr 23 07:44 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K Apr 23 07:44 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.4K Apr 23 07:44 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Apr 23 07:44 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.8K Apr 11 17:25 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 69K Apr 11 17:25 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.5K Apr 11 17:21 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 54K Apr 11 17:21 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K Apr 23 07:44 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K Apr 23 07:44 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 equiv_pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 10 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 154K May 18 16:43 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
FORMULA_NAME StableMarking
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1717103560190
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=greatspnxred
BK_EXAMINATION=StableMarking
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=1800
BK_INPUT=PolyORBLF-COL-S06J04T06
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Applying reductions before tool greatspn
Invoking reducer
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-30 21:12:41] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, StableMarking, -timeout, 180, -rebuildPNML]
[2024-05-30 21:12:41] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-30 21:12:41] [INFO ] Detected file is not PT type :http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.axiom.locator.DefaultOMMetaFactoryLocator).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info.
[2024-05-30 21:12:42] [WARNING] Using fallBack plugin, rng conformance not checked
[2024-05-30 21:12:42] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (colored model parsed with PNMLFW) : 686 ms
[2024-05-30 21:12:42] [INFO ] Imported 81 HL places and 65 HL transitions for a total of 632 PT places and 10560.0 transition bindings in 23 ms.
[2024-05-30 21:12:42] [INFO ] Built PT skeleton of HLPN with 81 places and 65 transitions 254 arcs in 4 ms.
[2024-05-30 21:12:42] [INFO ] Skeletonized 0 HLPN properties in 0 ms.
RANDOM walk for 40004 steps (3912 resets) in 1169 ms. (34 steps per ms) remains 24/81 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (11 resets) in 69 ms. (57 steps per ms) remains 1/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (13 resets) in 37 ms. (105 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2024-05-30 21:12:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 64 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 81 cols
[2024-05-30 21:12:43] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 8 ms
[2024-05-30 21:12:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 8 read => feed constraints.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 27/28 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 7/35 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 10/45 variables, 2/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 4/49 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 24/73 variables, 12/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 5/78 variables, 3/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 1/79 variables, 1/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 64/143 variables, 79/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 8/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 2/145 variables, 2/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 1/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 0/145 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 145/145 variables, and 115 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 219 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 81/81 constraints, ReadFeed: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 27/28 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 7/35 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 10/45 variables, 2/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 4/49 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 24/73 variables, 12/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
[2024-05-30 21:12:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 21:12:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 21:12:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 3/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 5/78 variables, 3/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 1/79 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 64/143 variables, 79/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 8/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 2/145 variables, 2/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 1/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 0/145 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 145/145 variables, and 119 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 318 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 81/81 constraints, ReadFeed: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 593ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 19 ms.
Support contains 1 out of 81 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 81/81 places, 65/65 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 9 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 9 transitions
Performed 9 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 9
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 80 transition count 56
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 71 transition count 56
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 71 transition count 53
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 68 transition count 53
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 62 transition count 47
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 2 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 62 transition count 45
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 60 transition count 45
Applied a total of 41 rules in 40 ms. Remains 60 /81 variables (removed 21) and now considering 45/65 (removed 20) transitions.
Running 44 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 21:12:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 44 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 60 cols
[2024-05-30 21:12:43] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-30 21:12:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 8 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 15/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
[2024-05-30 21:12:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 21:12:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 21:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 3/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
[2024-05-30 21:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
[2024-05-30 21:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 1/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
[2024-05-30 21:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 21:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 2/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
[2024-05-30 21:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 21:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 2/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 44/104 variables, 60/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 8/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 104/104 variables, and 102 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved in 1579 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, ReadFeed: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 44/44 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 15/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 8/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
[2024-05-30 21:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
[2024-05-30 21:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
[2024-05-30 21:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 1/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 44/104 variables, 60/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 8/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 44/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 104/104 variables, and 149 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved in 1747 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, ReadFeed: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 44/44 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints]
After SMT, in 3354ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3357ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 3420 ms. Remains : 60/81 places, 45/65 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 289240 steps (31505 resets) in 632 ms. (456 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Able to resolve query StableMarking after proving 81 properties.
[2024-05-30 21:12:47] [INFO ] Unfolded HLPN to a Petri net with 632 places and 10500 transitions 88770 arcs in 214 ms.
[2024-05-30 21:12:47] [INFO ] Unfolded 81 HLPN properties in 0 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 8070 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 8070 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 2935 steps (12 resets) in 179 ms. (16 steps per ms) remains 0/81 properties
Able to resolve query StableMarking after proving 81 properties.
FORMULA StableMarking FALSE TECHNIQUES RANDOM_WALK TOPOLOGICAL
Total runtime 6148 ms.
ITS solved all properties within timeout
BK_STOP 1717103567864
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination StableMarking -timeout 180 -rebuildPNML
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="PolyORBLF-COL-S06J04T06"
export BK_EXAMINATION="StableMarking"
export BK_TOOL="greatspnxred"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="1800"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool greatspnxred"
echo " Input is PolyORBLF-COL-S06J04T06, examination is StableMarking"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r298-tajo-171654454900113"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/PolyORBLF-COL-S06J04T06.tgz
mv PolyORBLF-COL-S06J04T06 execution
cd execution
if [ "StableMarking" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "Liveness" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "StableMarking" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "StableMarking" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "StableMarking.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property StableMarking.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "StableMarking.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "StableMarking" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "Liveness" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME StableMarking"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;