fond
Model Checking Contest 2024
14th edition, Geneva, Switzerland, June 25, 2024
Execution of r298-tajo-171654454800063
Last Updated
July 7, 2024

About the Execution of GreatSPN+red for PolyORBLF-COL-S02J06T06

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
366.279 10933.00 26174.00 59.00 T normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r298-tajo-171654454800063.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file='/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2' backing_fmt='qcow2' encryption=off cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool greatspnxred
Input is PolyORBLF-COL-S02J06T06, examination is StableMarking
Time confinement is 1800 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r298-tajo-171654454800063
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 544K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.9K Apr 11 16:58 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 72K Apr 11 16:58 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.8K Apr 11 16:55 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 48K Apr 11 16:55 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.1K Apr 23 07:43 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 30K Apr 23 07:43 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.5K Apr 23 07:43 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Apr 23 07:43 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.8K Apr 11 17:02 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 81K Apr 11 17:02 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.6K Apr 11 17:00 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 55K Apr 11 17:00 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K Apr 23 07:43 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K Apr 23 07:43 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 equiv_pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 10 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 154K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

FORMULA_NAME StableMarking

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1717103363143

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=greatspnxred
BK_EXAMINATION=StableMarking
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=1800
BK_INPUT=PolyORBLF-COL-S02J06T06
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Applying reductions before tool greatspn
Invoking reducer
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-30 21:09:24] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, StableMarking, -timeout, 180, -rebuildPNML]
[2024-05-30 21:09:24] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-30 21:09:24] [INFO ] Detected file is not PT type :http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.axiom.locator.DefaultOMMetaFactoryLocator).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info.
[2024-05-30 21:09:25] [WARNING] Using fallBack plugin, rng conformance not checked
[2024-05-30 21:09:25] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (colored model parsed with PNMLFW) : 1213 ms
[2024-05-30 21:09:26] [INFO ] Imported 81 HL places and 65 HL transitions for a total of 536 PT places and 1096.0 transition bindings in 76 ms.
[2024-05-30 21:09:26] [INFO ] Built PT skeleton of HLPN with 81 places and 65 transitions 254 arcs in 8 ms.
[2024-05-30 21:09:26] [INFO ] Skeletonized 0 HLPN properties in 0 ms.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (19 resets) in 1961 ms. (20 steps per ms) remains 4/81 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (15 resets) in 442 ms. (90 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (10 resets) in 181 ms. (219 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (13 resets) in 235 ms. (169 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 176 ms. (226 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
[2024-05-30 21:09:27] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 64 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 81 cols
[2024-05-30 21:09:27] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 9 ms
[2024-05-30 21:09:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 8 read => feed constraints.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 10/14 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 9/23 variables, 2/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 23/46 variables, 3/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 3/49 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 24/73 variables, 12/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 5/78 variables, 3/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 1/79 variables, 1/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 64/143 variables, 79/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 8/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 2/145 variables, 2/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 1/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 0/145 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 145/145 variables, and 115 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 598 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 81/81 constraints, ReadFeed: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 10/14 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 9/23 variables, 2/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 23/46 variables, 3/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 3/49 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 24/73 variables, 12/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
[2024-05-30 21:09:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 114 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 5/78 variables, 3/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 1/79 variables, 1/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 64/143 variables, 79/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 8/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Problem smplace_47 is UNSAT
SMT process timed out in 1034ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 4 out of 81 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 81/81 places, 65/65 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 9 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 9 transitions
Performed 9 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 9
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 80 transition count 56
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 71 transition count 56
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 71 transition count 53
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 68 transition count 53
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 61 transition count 46
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 2 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 61 transition count 44
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 59 transition count 44
Applied a total of 43 rules in 61 ms. Remains 59 /81 variables (removed 22) and now considering 44/65 (removed 21) transitions.
Running 43 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 21:09:28] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 43 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 43 rows 59 cols
[2024-05-30 21:09:28] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-30 21:09:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 8 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 15/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
[2024-05-30 21:09:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 21:09:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 21:09:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 21:09:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 21:09:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 5/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
Problem TDEAD42 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD43 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 1/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 41 unsolved
[2024-05-30 21:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 21:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 21:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 3/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 43/102 variables, 59/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 8/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/102 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 41 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 102/102 variables, and 100 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 41 unsolved in 1302 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, ReadFeed: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 2 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 15/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 6/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 41 unsolved
[2024-05-30 21:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 1/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 41 unsolved
[2024-05-30 21:09:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 21:09:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 21:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 842 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 21:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 21:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 21:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 509 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 6/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 1/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 41 unsolved
[2024-05-30 21:09:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 43/102 variables, 59/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 8/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 41/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 41 unsolved
[2024-05-30 21:09:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 21:09:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 2/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/102 variables, 0/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 41 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 102/102 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 41 unsolved in 4040 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, ReadFeed: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 41/43 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints]
After SMT, in 5383ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 41 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 2 dead transitions in 5386ms
Found 2 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 2 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) triggered by suspicious arc values removed 2 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 1 : 59/81 places, 42/65 transitions.
Reduce places removed 0 places and 2 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 194 edges and 59 vertex of which 4 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 55 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 55 places :
Also discarding 38 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 38 transitions
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 4 transition count 2
Reduce places removed 0 places and 2 transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 1 rules in 7 ms. Remains 4 /59 variables (removed 55) and now considering 0/42 (removed 42) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 2 iterations and 5479 ms. Remains : 4/81 places, 0/65 transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
FORMULA StableMarking TRUE TECHNIQUES SKELETON_TEST
Total runtime 9271 ms.
ITS solved all properties within timeout

BK_STOP 1717103374076

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination StableMarking -timeout 180 -rebuildPNML

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="PolyORBLF-COL-S02J06T06"
export BK_EXAMINATION="StableMarking"
export BK_TOOL="greatspnxred"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="1800"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool greatspnxred"
echo " Input is PolyORBLF-COL-S02J06T06, examination is StableMarking"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r298-tajo-171654454800063"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/PolyORBLF-COL-S02J06T06.tgz
mv PolyORBLF-COL-S02J06T06 execution
cd execution
if [ "StableMarking" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "Liveness" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "StableMarking" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "StableMarking" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "StableMarking.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property StableMarking.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "StableMarking.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' StableMarking.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "StableMarking" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "Liveness" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME StableMarking"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;