About the Execution of ITS-Tools for Philosophers-PT-000010
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
348.707 | 33802.00 | 56460.00 | 255.90 | FTTTTFTTFFFTTTFF | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r268-smll-171654407700490.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is Philosophers-PT-000010, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r268-smll-171654407700490
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 692K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Apr 13 09:28 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 128K Apr 13 09:28 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 10K Apr 13 09:24 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 81K Apr 13 09:24 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.6K Apr 23 07:42 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 40K Apr 23 07:42 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.0K Apr 23 07:42 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 31K Apr 23 07:42 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Apr 13 09:31 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 121K Apr 13 09:31 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Apr 13 09:29 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 136K Apr 13 09:29 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.4K Apr 23 07:42 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.9K Apr 23 07:42 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 22K May 18 16:43 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME Philosophers-PT-000010-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME Philosophers-PT-000010-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME Philosophers-PT-000010-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME Philosophers-PT-000010-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME Philosophers-PT-000010-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME Philosophers-PT-000010-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME Philosophers-PT-000010-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME Philosophers-PT-000010-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME Philosophers-PT-000010-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME Philosophers-PT-000010-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME Philosophers-PT-000010-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME Philosophers-PT-000010-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME Philosophers-PT-000010-CTLFireability-2024-12
FORMULA_NAME Philosophers-PT-000010-CTLFireability-2024-13
FORMULA_NAME Philosophers-PT-000010-CTLFireability-2024-14
FORMULA_NAME Philosophers-PT-000010-CTLFireability-2024-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1716909382042
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=Philosophers-PT-000010
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-28 15:16:24] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-28 15:16:24] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-28 15:16:24] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 147 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:24] [INFO ] Transformed 50 places.
[2024-05-28 15:16:24] [INFO ] Transformed 50 transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:24] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-28 15:16:24] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 50 places and 50 transitions and 160 arcs in 363 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 29 ms.
Support contains 50 out of 50 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 50/50 places, 50/50 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 14 ms. Remains 50 /50 variables (removed 0) and now considering 50/50 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 50 rows 50 cols
[2024-05-28 15:16:24] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 12 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 285 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 15:16:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 15:16:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 144 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 483 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 30 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 10/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 10/50 variables, 10/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 10/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 50/100 variables, 50/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/100 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 100/100 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved in 945 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 50/50 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 10/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 10/50 variables, 10/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 10/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 50/100 variables, 50/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 30/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/100 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 100/100 variables, and 150 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved in 544 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 50/50 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1545ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1569ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2096 ms. Remains : 50/50 places, 50/50 transitions.
Support contains 50 out of 50 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 40 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 50 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 37 to 32
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (285 resets) in 1829 ms. (21 steps per ms) remains 2/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 466 ms. (85 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (42 resets) in 496 ms. (80 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
[2024-05-28 15:16:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp26 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp28 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 15/100 variables, and 9 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved in 36 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 4/50 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/20 constraints, State Equation: 0/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 43ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2024-05-28 15:16:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 50 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 50/50 places, 50/50 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 50 /50 variables (removed 0) and now considering 50/50 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 15:16:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 15:16:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 15:16:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 77 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 133 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 30 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 10/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 10/50 variables, 10/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 10/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 50/100 variables, 50/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/100 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 100/100 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved in 539 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 50/50 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 10/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 10/50 variables, 10/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 10/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 50/100 variables, 50/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 30/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/100 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 100/100 variables, and 150 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved in 556 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 50/50 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1113ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1114ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1248 ms. Remains : 50/50 places, 50/50 transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 50 transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16842179868840528083.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9354780903718111185.ctl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16842179868840528083.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9354780903718111185.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,59049,0.024355,3612,2,258,5,1041,6,0,253,736,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(((AG(E(((((((Fork_7==1)&&(Catch1_7==1))||((Fork_2==1)&&(Catch1_2==1)))||(((Fork_5==1)&&(Catch1_5==1))||((Fork_9==1)&&(Catch1_9==1))))|...3930
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(((!(E(TRUE U !(E(((((((Fork_7==1)&&(Catch1_7==1))||((Fork_2==1)&&(Catch1_2==1)))||(((Fork_5==1)&&(...7196
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/50
(forward)formula 0,0,0.234494,9240,1,0,28,31283,41,11,1463,31225,28
FORMULA Philosophers-PT-000010-CTLFireability-2024-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 50/50 places, 50/50 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 50 /50 variables (removed 0) and now considering 50/50 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 15:16:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 15:16:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 15:16:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 65 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 105 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 30 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 10/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 10/50 variables, 10/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 10/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 50/100 variables, 50/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/100 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 100/100 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved in 597 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 50/50 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 10/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 10/50 variables, 10/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 10/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 50/100 variables, 50/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 30/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/100 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 100/100 variables, and 150 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved in 605 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 50/50 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1215ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1216ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1322 ms. Remains : 50/50 places, 50/50 transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 50 transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9383366993449708527.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17080148818326667192.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9383366993449708527.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17080148818326667192.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,59049,0.012914,3736,2,258,5,1041,6,0,253,736,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(A((EG(AX(((((((Think_8==1)&&(Fork_8==1))||((Think_6==1)&&(Fork_6==1)))||(((Think_10==1)&&(Fork_10==1))||((Think_5==1)&&(Fork_5==1))))||...3047
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((EY((FwdU(Init,!((E(!(EX(E(TRUE U (((((((Think_8==1)&&(Fork_8==1))||((Think_6==1)&&(Fork_6==1)))||(((Think_10...7702
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/50
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,0.313066,11112,1,0,37,40008,39,34,1501,45843,61
FORMULA Philosophers-PT-000010-CTLFireability-2024-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 50/50 places, 50/50 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 50 /50 variables (removed 0) and now considering 50/50 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 15:16:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 15:16:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 15:16:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 77 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 133 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 30 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 10/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 10/50 variables, 10/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 10/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 50/100 variables, 50/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/100 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 100/100 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved in 710 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 50/50 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 10/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 10/50 variables, 10/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 10/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 50/100 variables, 50/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 30/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/100 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 100/100 variables, and 150 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved in 625 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 50/50 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1351ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1353ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1488 ms. Remains : 50/50 places, 50/50 transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 50 transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14069237152511088150.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6268345614767174569.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14069237152511088150.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6268345614767174569.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,59049,0.012651,3736,2,258,5,1041,6,0,253,736,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EF(((((EG(A(((((((Fork_3==1)&&(Catch2_4==1))||((Fork_5==1)&&(Catch2_6==1)))||(((Fork_9==1)&&(Catch2_10==1))||((Fork_1==1)&&(Catch2_2==...2276
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U ((((EG(!((E(!(((((((Think_4==1)&&(Fork_3==1))||((Think_1==1)&&(Fork_10==1)))||(((Think_2...3639
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/197/50
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/197/50
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/201/50
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/201/50
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,0.640862,20640,1,0,29,101190,48,15,1706,91646,26
FORMULA Philosophers-PT-000010-CTLFireability-2024-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 50/50 places, 50/50 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 50 /50 variables (removed 0) and now considering 50/50 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 15:16:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 15:16:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 15:16:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 97 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 178 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-28 15:16:34] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 30 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 10/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 10/50 variables, 10/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 10/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 50/100 variables, 50/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/100 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 100/100 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved in 837 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 50/50 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 10/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 10/50 variables, 10/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 10/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 50/100 variables, 50/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 30/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/100 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 100/100 variables, and 150 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved in 741 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 50/50 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1594ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1596ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1792 ms. Remains : 50/50 places, 50/50 transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 50 transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11574591650412310530.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12254750922908041517.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11574591650412310530.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12254750922908041517.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,59049,0.012932,3744,2,258,5,1041,6,0,253,736,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG((((((((Think_8==0)||(Fork_8==0))&&((Think_6==0)||(Fork_6==0)))&&(((Think_10==0)||(Fork_10==0))&&((Think_5==0)||(Fork_5==0))))&&((((...968
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((((((((Think_8==0)||(Fork_8==0))&&((Think_6==0)||(Fork_6==0)))&&(((Think_10==0)...1032
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.08208,5836,1,0,8,12146,15,3,1367,7431,5
FORMULA Philosophers-PT-000010-CTLFireability-2024-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 50/50 places, 50/50 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 50 /50 variables (removed 0) and now considering 50/50 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 15:16:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 15:16:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 15:16:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 65 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 112 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 30 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 10/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 10/50 variables, 10/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 10/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 50/100 variables, 50/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/100 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 100/100 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved in 714 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 50/50 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 10/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 10/50 variables, 10/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 10/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 50/100 variables, 50/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 30/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/100 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 100/100 variables, and 150 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved in 807 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 50/50 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1539ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1540ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1653 ms. Remains : 50/50 places, 50/50 transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 50 transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3910519039545694698.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability585612326883911019.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3910519039545694698.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability585612326883911019.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,59049,0.019714,3732,2,258,5,1041,6,0,253,736,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(!(E(((((((Fork_3==1)&&(Catch2_4==1))||((Fork_5==1)&&(Catch2_6==1)))||(((Fork_9==1)&&(Catch2_10==1))||((Fork_1==1)&&(Catch2_2==1))))||(...981
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(EY(Init),((((((Fork_3==1)&&(Catch2_4==1))||((Fork_5==1)&&(Catch2_6==1)))||(((Fork_9==1)&&(Catch2_10==1))|...1041
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/197/50
(forward)formula 0,1,0.220913,7472,1,0,13,23169,26,6,1435,14410,11
FORMULA Philosophers-PT-000010-CTLFireability-2024-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 50/50 places, 50/50 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 50 /50 variables (removed 0) and now considering 50/50 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 15:16:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 15:16:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 15:16:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 84 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 149 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 30 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 10/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 10/50 variables, 10/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 10/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 50/100 variables, 50/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/100 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 100/100 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved in 532 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 50/50 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 10/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 10/50 variables, 10/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 10/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 50/100 variables, 50/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 30/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/100 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 100/100 variables, and 150 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved in 648 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 50/50 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1194ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1195ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1347 ms. Remains : 50/50 places, 50/50 transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 50 transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13543965415328515425.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10188725185300209367.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13543965415328515425.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10188725185300209367.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,59049,0.013498,3740,2,258,5,1041,6,0,253,736,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(E(E(EF(((((((Think_4==1)&&(Fork_3==1))||((Think_1==1)&&(Fork_10==1)))||(((Think_2==1)&&(Fork_1==1))||((Think_6==1)&&(Fork_5==1))))||((...1621
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(E(E(TRUE U ((((((Think_4==1)&&(Fork_3==1))||((Think_1==1)&&(Fork_10==1)))||(((Think_2==1)&&(For...2337
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/198/50
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/198/50
(forward)formula 0,0,0.301837,11916,1,0,20,46481,38,12,1513,39295,31
FORMULA Philosophers-PT-000010-CTLFireability-2024-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 50/50 places, 50/50 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 50 /50 variables (removed 0) and now considering 50/50 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 15:16:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 98 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 15:16:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 15:16:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 111 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 215 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-28 15:16:39] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 30 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 10/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 10/50 variables, 10/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 10/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 50/100 variables, 50/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/100 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 100/100 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved in 846 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 50/50 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 10/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 10/50 variables, 10/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 10/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 50/100 variables, 50/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 30/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/100 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 100/100 variables, and 150 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved in 622 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 50/50 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1479ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1480ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1706 ms. Remains : 50/50 places, 50/50 transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 50 transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability228031274934925993.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability451660343023592216.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability228031274934925993.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability451660343023592216.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...281
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,59049,0.013822,3736,2,258,5,1041,6,0,253,736,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EF(((((((Think_4==0)||(Fork_3==0))&&((Think_1==0)||(Fork_10==0)))&&(((Think_2==0)||(Fork_1==0))&&((Think_6==0)||(Fork_5==0))))&&((((T...788
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),TRUE) * ((((((Think_4==0)||(Fork_3==0))&&((Think_1==0)||(Fork_10==0)))&&(((Think_2==0)||...878
(forward)formula 0,1,0.022587,4052,1,0,7,1450,9,1,510,1151,3
FORMULA Philosophers-PT-000010-CTLFireability-2024-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 50/50 places, 50/50 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 50 /50 variables (removed 0) and now considering 50/50 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 15:16:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 82 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 15:16:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 15:16:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 101 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 185 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 30 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 10/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 10/50 variables, 10/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 10/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 50/100 variables, 50/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/100 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 100/100 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved in 751 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 50/50 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 10/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 10/50 variables, 10/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 10/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 50/100 variables, 50/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 30/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/100 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 100/100 variables, and 150 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved in 746 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 50/50 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1506ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1507ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1694 ms. Remains : 50/50 places, 50/50 transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 50 transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12058729554451071700.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1480787834212960421.ctl : 20 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12058729554451071700.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1480787834212960421.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,59049,0.016643,3736,2,258,5,1041,6,0,253,736,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EF(((((((Think_4==0)||(Fork_3==0))&&((Think_1==0)||(Fork_10==0)))&&(((Think_2==0)||(Fork_1==0))&&((Think_6==0)||(Fork_5==0))))&&((((T...1597
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * E(TRUE U ((((((Think_4==0)||(Fork_3==0))&&((Think_1==0)||(Fork_10==0)))&&(((Think_2==0)...2015
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.0633,5064,1,0,9,8342,15,2,1321,3811,7
FORMULA Philosophers-PT-000010-CTLFireability-2024-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 50/50 places, 50/50 transitions.
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 42 transition count 42
Applied a total of 16 rules in 24 ms. Remains 42 /50 variables (removed 8) and now considering 42/50 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 42 rows 42 cols
[2024-05-28 15:16:43] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 7 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 119 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 15:16:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 15:16:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 125 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 246 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-28 15:16:43] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 22 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 10/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 10/42 variables, 10/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 10/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 42/84 variables, 42/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/84 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 84/84 variables, and 104 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved in 525 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 42/42 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 10/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 10/42 variables, 10/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 10/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 42/84 variables, 42/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 22/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 0/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/84 variables, 0/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 84/84 variables, and 126 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved in 413 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 42/42 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 949ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 950ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 42/50 places, 42/50 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1228 ms. Remains : 42/50 places, 42/50 transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 42 transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16109958566882409037.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3522071004455210215.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16109958566882409037.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3522071004455210215.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,20295,0.009957,3676,2,170,5,694,6,0,213,481,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(((Fork_5==1)&&(Catch2_6==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(((Fork_5==1)&&(Catch2_6==1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.025462,4256,1,0,7,4225,15,1,1008,1243,5
FORMULA Philosophers-PT-000010-CTLFireability-2024-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 50/50 places, 50/50 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 50 /50 variables (removed 0) and now considering 50/50 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 50 rows 50 cols
[2024-05-28 15:16:44] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 5 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 15:16:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 15:16:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 103 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 169 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 30 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 10/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 10/50 variables, 10/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 10/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 50/100 variables, 50/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/100 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 100/100 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved in 738 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 50/50 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 10/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 10/50 variables, 10/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 10/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 50/100 variables, 50/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 30/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/100 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 100/100 variables, and 150 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved in 734 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 50/50 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1482ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1483ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1654 ms. Remains : 50/50 places, 50/50 transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 50 transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1803726504925276216.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9930546248664232973.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1803726504925276216.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9930546248664232973.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,59049,0.012803,3740,2,258,5,1041,6,0,253,736,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EX((((Fork_2==0)||(Catch2_3==0))&&((Think_7==0)||(Fork_7==0)))) + (EX(((Fork_2==0)||(Catch2_3==0))) * EF((Eat_9==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((EX(((Fork_2==0)||(Catch2_3==0))) * E(TRUE U (Eat_9==1))))) * !(EX((((Fork_2==0)||(Catch2...204
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.05521,5376,1,0,13,10220,16,6,1182,4863,9
FORMULA Philosophers-PT-000010-CTLFireability-2024-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 50/50 places, 50/50 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 50 /50 variables (removed 0) and now considering 50/50 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 15:16:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 83 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 15:16:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 15:16:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 105 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 190 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 30 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 10/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 10/50 variables, 10/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 10/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 50/100 variables, 50/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/100 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 100/100 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved in 751 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 50/50 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 10/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 10/50 variables, 10/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 10/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 50/100 variables, 50/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 30/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/100 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 100/100 variables, and 150 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved in 611 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 50/50 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1374ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1375ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1567 ms. Remains : 50/50 places, 50/50 transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 50 transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9996403640992294743.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9228298324322128910.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9996403640992294743.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9228298324322128910.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,59049,0.022445,3736,2,258,5,1041,6,0,253,736,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((AG(EF(AG(((Fork_3==1)&&(Catch1_3==1))))) * EF(EX((((Fork_2==1)&&(Catch1_2==1))||((Fork_10==1)&&(Catch1_10==1)))))) * EG(EX(((Fork_2=...178
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(((Fork_3==1)&&(Catch1_3==1))))))))) * E(TRUE U EX((((Fork_2==1)&...257
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,0.128926,6164,1,0,14,14570,28,3,1338,8300,16
FORMULA Philosophers-PT-000010-CTLFireability-2024-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 50/50 places, 50/50 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 48 transition count 48
Applied a total of 4 rules in 6 ms. Remains 48 /50 variables (removed 2) and now considering 48/50 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 48 rows 48 cols
[2024-05-28 15:16:48] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 85 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 15:16:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 15:16:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 109 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 196 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-28 15:16:48] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 38/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 10/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 10/48 variables, 10/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 10/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 48/96 variables, 48/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/96 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 96/96 variables, and 116 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 605 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 48/48 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 48/48 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 38/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 10/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 10/48 variables, 10/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 10/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 48/96 variables, 48/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 28/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 0/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/96 variables, 0/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 96/96 variables, and 144 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 475 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 48/48 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 48/48 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1087ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1088ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 48/50 places, 48/50 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1299 ms. Remains : 48/50 places, 48/50 transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 48 transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1031440142672245081.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1279713629630471983.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1031440142672245081.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1279713629630471983.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,46656,0.012739,3720,2,220,5,852,6,0,243,593,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EF((((A(((Think_6==1)&&(Fork_6==1)) U ((Think_10==1)&&(Fork_9==1))) + (Think_4==0)) + ((Fork_4==0)||(Think_3==0))) + (((Fork_2==0)||(...230
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((Eat_3==1))) * !(E(TRUE U (((!((E(!(((Think_10==1)&&(Fork_9==1))) U (!(((Think_6==1)&&(Fo...378
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 41/0/7
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 41/0/7
(forward)formula 0,1,0.060954,5356,1,0,19,10154,31,9,1256,6535,16
FORMULA Philosophers-PT-000010-CTLFireability-2024-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 50/50 places, 50/50 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 50 /50 variables (removed 0) and now considering 50/50 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 50 rows 50 cols
[2024-05-28 15:16:49] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 95 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 15:16:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 15:16:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 90 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 188 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 30 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 10/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 10/50 variables, 10/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 10/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 50/100 variables, 50/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/100 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 100/100 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved in 577 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 50/50 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 10/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 10/50 variables, 10/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 10/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 50/100 variables, 50/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 30/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/100 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 100/100 variables, and 150 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved in 687 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 50/50 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1273ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1274ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1463 ms. Remains : 50/50 places, 50/50 transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 50 transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5791979715134492147.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10590845239544317703.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5791979715134492147.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10590845239544317703.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,59049,0.020369,3736,2,258,5,1041,6,0,253,736,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AF(E(((Think_10==1)&&(Fork_9==1)) U EF((Eat_9==1)))) U AF(!(E(AX((Eat_3==1)) U EF(((Think_10==1)&&(Fork_9==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(EG(!(E(((Think_10==1)&&(Fork_9==1)) U E(TRUE U (Eat_9==1))))))) * !(EG(!(!(E(!(EX(!((Eat_3==1)))) ...211
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 43/5/7
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,0.128206,6164,1,0,23,14285,37,27,1351,12138,55
FORMULA Philosophers-PT-000010-CTLFireability-2024-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 50/50 places, 50/50 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 50 /50 variables (removed 0) and now considering 50/50 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 15:16:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 76 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 15:16:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 15:16:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 118 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 196 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 30 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 10/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 10/50 variables, 10/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 10/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 50/100 variables, 50/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/100 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 100/100 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved in 656 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 50/50 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 10/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 10/50 variables, 10/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 10/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 50/100 variables, 50/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 30/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/100 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 100/100 variables, and 150 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved in 737 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 50/50 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1402ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1403ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1601 ms. Remains : 50/50 places, 50/50 transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 50 transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4336902484306725596.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8675227613077638566.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4336902484306725596.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8675227613077638566.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,59049,0.021135,3740,2,258,5,1041,6,0,253,736,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(AX(((Think_4==0)||(Fork_4==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(EX(!(((Think_4==0)||(Fork_4==0))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.076145,4848,1,0,9,8590,15,2,1180,3031,6
FORMULA Philosophers-PT-000010-CTLFireability-2024-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 50/50 places, 50/50 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 50 /50 variables (removed 0) and now considering 50/50 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 15:16:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 15:16:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 15:16:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 82 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 148 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 30 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 10/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 10/50 variables, 10/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 10/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 50/100 variables, 50/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/100 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 100/100 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved in 511 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 50/50 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 10/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 10/50 variables, 10/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 10/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 50/100 variables, 50/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 30/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/100 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 100/100 variables, and 150 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved in 724 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 50/50 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1242ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1243ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1392 ms. Remains : 50/50 places, 50/50 transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 50 transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2292550150007675718.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7808566595115578751.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2292550150007675718.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7808566595115578751.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,59049,0.023732,3736,2,258,5,1041,6,0,253,736,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(((Think_7==1)&&(Fork_6==1))) * AG(EF(EX(((((Fork_1==1)&&(Catch1_1==1))||(Eat_5==1)) * A(((Think_2==1)&&(Fork_2==1)) U ((Think_4==1)&&...173
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(TRUE U ((Think_7==1)&&(Fork_6==1)))))] = FALSE * [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U EX(((((Fork_1==1)&...344
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 43/0/7
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 43/0/7
(forward)formula 0,0,0.174121,6692,1,0,16,18875,29,8,1337,13034,15
FORMULA Philosophers-PT-000010-CTLFireability-2024-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 50/50 places, 50/50 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 50 /50 variables (removed 0) and now considering 50/50 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 15:16:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 84 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 15:16:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 15:16:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 90 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 175 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 30 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 10/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 10/50 variables, 10/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 10/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 50/100 variables, 50/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/100 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 100/100 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved in 509 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 50/50 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 40/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 10/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 10/50 variables, 10/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 10/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 50/100 variables, 50/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 30/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/100 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 100/100 variables, and 150 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved in 461 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 50/50 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 979ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 979ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1156 ms. Remains : 50/50 places, 50/50 transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 50 transitions.
[2024-05-28 15:16:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4895464377772890758.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13744941212778863424.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4895464377772890758.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13744941212778863424.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,59049,0.01231,3736,2,258,5,1041,6,0,253,736,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX(AF(((((Fork_1==0)||(Catch1_1==0))&&((Think_8==0)||(Fork_7==0)))||((Eat_7==0)&&((Think_7==0)||(Fork_7==0)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(EG(!(((((Fork_1==0)||(Catch1_1==0))&&((Think_8==0)||(Fork_7==0)))||((Eat_7==0)&&((Thi...194
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.056021,5108,1,0,12,10424,19,6,1232,5092,7
FORMULA Philosophers-PT-000010-CTLFireability-2024-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
[2024-05-28 15:16:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 15:16:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Total runtime 31494 ms.
BK_STOP 1716909415844
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="Philosophers-PT-000010"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is Philosophers-PT-000010, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r268-smll-171654407700490"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/Philosophers-PT-000010.tgz
mv Philosophers-PT-000010 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;