fond
Model Checking Contest 2024
14th edition, Geneva, Switzerland, June 25, 2024
Execution of r268-smll-171654406800065
Last Updated
July 7, 2024

About the Execution of ITS-Tools for Parking-PT-208

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
1093.779 228960.00 252943.00 913.30 FFTTTFFTTFTTTFFF normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r268-smll-171654406800065.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is Parking-PT-208, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r268-smll-171654406800065
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 544K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.9K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 95K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.6K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 53K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Apr 23 07:41 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K Apr 23 07:41 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K Apr 23 07:41 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K Apr 23 07:41 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Apr 11 16:23 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 120K Apr 11 16:23 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.6K Apr 11 16:21 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 89K Apr 11 16:21 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Apr 23 07:41 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K Apr 23 07:41 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 49K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME Parking-PT-208-CTLCardinality-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME Parking-PT-208-CTLCardinality-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME Parking-PT-208-CTLCardinality-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME Parking-PT-208-CTLCardinality-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME Parking-PT-208-CTLCardinality-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME Parking-PT-208-CTLCardinality-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME Parking-PT-208-CTLCardinality-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME Parking-PT-208-CTLCardinality-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME Parking-PT-208-CTLCardinality-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME Parking-PT-208-CTLCardinality-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME Parking-PT-208-CTLCardinality-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME Parking-PT-208-CTLCardinality-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME Parking-PT-208-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME Parking-PT-208-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME Parking-PT-208-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME Parking-PT-208-CTLCardinality-2023-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716655093836

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=Parking-PT-208
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-25 16:38:16] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-25 16:38:16] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-25 16:38:16] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 150 ms
[2024-05-25 16:38:16] [INFO ] Transformed 137 places.
[2024-05-25 16:38:16] [INFO ] Transformed 201 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:38:16] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-25 16:38:16] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 137 places and 201 transitions and 593 arcs in 404 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 45 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 84 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 84 transitions.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA Parking-PT-208-CTLCardinality-2024-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 86 out of 137 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 117/117 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 25 ms. Remains 137 /137 variables (removed 0) and now considering 117/117 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 117 rows 137 cols
[2024-05-25 16:38:17] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 28 ms
[2024-05-25 16:38:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 506 ms returned [28, 44, 52, 94, 102, 110, 118, 130]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 575 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 129/137 places, 117/117 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 126 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 126 transition count 114
Applied a total of 6 rules in 22 ms. Remains 126 /129 variables (removed 3) and now considering 114/117 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 114 rows 126 cols
[2024-05-25 16:38:17] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 16 ms
[2024-05-25 16:38:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 149 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 16:38:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 16:38:17] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 26 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-25 16:38:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 270 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 426 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 126/137 places, 114/117 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 1086 ms. Remains : 126/137 places, 114/117 transitions.
Support contains 86 out of 126 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-25 16:38:18] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 3 formulas.
[2024-05-25 16:38:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 62 ms
FORMULA Parking-PT-208-CTLCardinality-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA Parking-PT-208-CTLCardinality-2024-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA Parking-PT-208-CTLCardinality-2024-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-25 16:38:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2024-05-25 16:38:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 114 transitions.
Support contains 81 out of 126 places (down from 86) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1161 resets) in 3136 ms. (12 steps per ms) remains 10/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (100 resets) in 190 ms. (209 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (87 resets) in 164 ms. (242 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (103 resets) in 141 ms. (281 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (103 resets) in 124 ms. (320 steps per ms) remains 8/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (101 resets) in 152 ms. (261 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (86 resets) in 131 ms. (303 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (103 resets) in 119 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (100 resets) in 123 ms. (322 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
[2024-05-25 16:38:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 16:38:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 26 read => feed constraints.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp21 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 75/88 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 38/126 variables, 20/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 114/240 variables, 126/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 26/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/240 variables, 0/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 240/240 variables, and 178 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved in 401 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 126/126 constraints, ReadFeed: 26/26 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 79/88 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 38/126 variables, 20/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 114/240 variables, 126/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 26/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 7/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/240 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 240/240 variables, and 185 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved in 641 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 126/126 constraints, ReadFeed: 26/26 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 7/8 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1075ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 1233 ms.
Support contains 9 out of 126 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 126/126 places, 114/114 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 126 transition count 110
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 122 transition count 110
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 122 transition count 106
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 118 transition count 106
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 117 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 117 transition count 105
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 111 transition count 99
Free-agglomeration rule applied 20 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 111 transition count 79
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 91 transition count 79
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 90 transition count 78
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 3 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 72 transition count 68
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 62 transition count 68
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 62 transition count 56
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 50 transition count 56
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 136 place count 47 transition count 53
Iterating global reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 47 transition count 53
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 141 place count 45 transition count 51
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 143 place count 45 transition count 51
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 145 place count 43 transition count 48
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 147 place count 43 transition count 48
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 43 transition count 47
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 149 place count 42 transition count 46
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 42 transition count 46
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 151 place count 42 transition count 45
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 159 place count 38 transition count 41
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 162 place count 38 transition count 38
Applied a total of 162 rules in 77 ms. Remains 38 /126 variables (removed 88) and now considering 38/114 (removed 76) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 78 ms. Remains : 38/126 places, 38/114 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 1020 steps (0 resets) in 13 ms. (72 steps per ms) remains 0/7 properties
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 12 simplifications.
[2024-05-25 16:38:22] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2024-05-25 16:38:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
FORMULA Parking-PT-208-CTLCardinality-2024-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-25 16:38:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-25 16:38:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 114 transitions.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 126/126 places, 114/114 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 121 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 121 transition count 109
Applied a total of 10 rules in 13 ms. Remains 121 /126 variables (removed 5) and now considering 109/114 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 109 rows 121 cols
[2024-05-25 16:38:22] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 5 ms
[2024-05-25 16:38:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 115 ms returned [35, 59, 61, 117]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 117 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 117/126 places, 109/114 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 115 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 115 transition count 107
Applied a total of 4 rules in 6 ms. Remains 115 /117 variables (removed 2) and now considering 107/109 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 107 rows 115 cols
[2024-05-25 16:38:22] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-25 16:38:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 112 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 16:38:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 16:38:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 26 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-25 16:38:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 193 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 307 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 115/126 places, 107/114 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 443 ms. Remains : 115/126 places, 107/114 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:38:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-25 16:38:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-25 16:38:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 107 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:38:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-25 16:38:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-25 16:38:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12035036516032627914.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 16:38:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14282286180925356089.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12035036516032627914.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14282286180925356089.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.62144e+09,0.133162,5612,2,1003,5,8607,6,0,569,9967,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(((AG(E((p71==1) U ((p17==0)||(p73==1)))) + !(AG((p76==0)))) + ((!((p12==0)||(p126==1)))||(p15==1))) U ((EG(!(AF((p8==1)))) + (p78==0))...187
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(((!(E(TRUE U !(E((p71==1) U ((p17==0)||(p73==1)))))) + !(!(E(TRUE U !((p76==0)))))) + ((!((p12==0)...284
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t20, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tota...170
(forward)formula 0,0,2.64664,68544,1,0,398,317685,236,238,3369,443025,362
FORMULA Parking-PT-208-CTLCardinality-2024-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 126/126 places, 114/114 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 121 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 121 transition count 109
Applied a total of 10 rules in 12 ms. Remains 121 /126 variables (removed 5) and now considering 109/114 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 109 rows 121 cols
[2024-05-25 16:38:25] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-25 16:38:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 113 ms returned [35, 59, 61, 117]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 114 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 117/126 places, 109/114 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 115 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 115 transition count 107
Applied a total of 4 rules in 4 ms. Remains 115 /117 variables (removed 2) and now considering 107/109 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 107 rows 115 cols
[2024-05-25 16:38:25] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-25 16:38:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 93 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 16:38:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 16:38:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 26 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-25 16:38:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 267 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 366 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 115/126 places, 107/114 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 496 ms. Remains : 115/126 places, 107/114 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:38:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-25 16:38:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-25 16:38:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 107 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:38:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-25 16:38:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-25 16:38:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12526834010778124195.gal : 11 ms
[2024-05-25 16:38:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4332374015168558530.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12526834010778124195.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4332374015168558530.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.62144e+09,0.119892,5688,2,1003,5,8607,6,0,569,9967,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AF(((AF(AG((p50==1))) * A(EF((p22==1)) U (p91!=1))) * A(AG((p8==1)) U AG(((p136==0)||(p82==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),!(((!(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((p50==1))))))) * !((E(!((p91!=1)) U (!(E(TRUE U (p22==1))) * !((p91!=1)))...361
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t20, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tota...170
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,29.0824,672204,1,0,1343,3.92671e+06,262,893,3684,4.08818e+06,1542
FORMULA Parking-PT-208-CTLCardinality-2024-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 126/126 places, 114/114 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 123 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 123 transition count 111
Applied a total of 6 rules in 4 ms. Remains 123 /126 variables (removed 3) and now considering 111/114 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 111 rows 123 cols
[2024-05-25 16:38:55] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:38:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 105 ms returned [35, 60, 62, 119]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 106 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 119/126 places, 111/114 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 118 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 118 transition count 110
Applied a total of 2 rules in 3 ms. Remains 118 /119 variables (removed 1) and now considering 110/111 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 110 rows 118 cols
[2024-05-25 16:38:55] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:38:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 95 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 16:38:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 16:38:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 26 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-25 16:38:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 243 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 342 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 118/126 places, 110/114 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 457 ms. Remains : 118/126 places, 110/114 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:38:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-25 16:38:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-25 16:38:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 110 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:38:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-25 16:38:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-25 16:38:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality944170188056571245.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 16:38:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11623360896530414441.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality944170188056571245.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11623360896530414441.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.32923e+09,0.148897,6484,2,1354,5,11124,6,0,584,13737,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF((AF((AX((p128==1)) + EG(((p67==0)&&(p83==1))))) + ((p53==0)&&(p100==1)))) + AF(((((AX(((p127==0)&&(p98==1))) * !(E((p72==1) U ((p58==...271
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(!(EG(!((!(EG(!((!(EX(!((p128==1)))) + EG(((p67==0)&&(p83==1))))))) + ((p53==0)&&(p100==1))))))))...355
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t20, t21, t88, t91, t92, t107, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destro...196
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-25 16:39:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-25 16:39:26] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-25 16:39:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15942171606201477336.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15942171606201477336.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15942171606201477336.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15942171606201477336.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15942171606201477336.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-25 16:39:26] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-25 16:39:26] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-25 16:39:26] [INFO ] Removed a total of 11 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:39:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 57 ms
[2024-05-25 16:39:26] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2024-05-25 16:39:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5444359447121871052.gal : 6 ms
[2024-05-25 16:39:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13812344709206528859.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5444359447121871052.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13812344709206528859.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.32923e+09,0.05122,4884,128,75,1755,1068,358,2213,91,2571,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF((AF((AX((i11.i1.u35.p128==1)) + EG(((i5.u19.p67==0)&&(i11.i0.u26.p83==1))))) + ((i4.i1.u18.p53==0)&&(i10.u37.p100==1)))) + AF(((((AX(...410
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(!(EG(!((!(EG(!((!(EX(!((i11.i1.u35.p128==1)))) + EG(((i5.u19.p67==0)&&(i11.i0.u26.p83==1))))))) ...494
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t88, t91, i4.t92, i4.i1.u18.t107, i5.u19.t20, i5.u19.t21, i10.u37.t2, Intersection with reac...231
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
(forward)formula 0,1,10.3147,264180,1,0,448910,12410,2172,1.06889e+06,548,73447,416295
FORMULA Parking-PT-208-CTLCardinality-2024-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 126/126 places, 114/114 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 122 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 122 transition count 110
Applied a total of 8 rules in 2 ms. Remains 122 /126 variables (removed 4) and now considering 110/114 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 110 rows 122 cols
[2024-05-25 16:39:36] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:39:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 113 ms returned [61, 118]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 115 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 120/126 places, 110/114 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 120 /120 variables (removed 0) and now considering 110/110 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 121 ms. Remains : 120/126 places, 110/114 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:39:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-25 16:39:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-25 16:39:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 110 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:39:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-25 16:39:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-25 16:39:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7110720213309745987.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 16:39:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14324284867879877191.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7110720213309745987.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14324284867879877191.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.32923e+09,0.150626,6264,2,1834,5,10188,6,0,592,10452,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((EG(((p108==1) * !(E(((p114==0)||(p68==1)) U ((p126==0)||(p89==1)))))) + (!((EX(EF((p105==1))) + (E((p122==0) U ((p64==0)||(p38==1))) *...259
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(EG(((p108==1) * !(E(((p114==0)||(p68==1)) U ((p126==0)||(p89==1)))))) + (!((EX(E(TRUE U (p105==1)))...335
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t20, t21, t85, t91, t92, t107, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destro...196
(forward)formula 0,0,13.6364,328952,1,0,410,2.01814e+06,246,205,3681,1.79582e+06,443
FORMULA Parking-PT-208-CTLCardinality-2024-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 126/126 places, 114/114 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 122 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 122 transition count 110
Applied a total of 8 rules in 3 ms. Remains 122 /126 variables (removed 4) and now considering 110/114 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 110 rows 122 cols
[2024-05-25 16:39:50] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:39:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 101 ms returned [35, 59, 61, 117]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 102 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 118/126 places, 110/114 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 116 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 116 transition count 108
Applied a total of 4 rules in 2 ms. Remains 116 /118 variables (removed 2) and now considering 108/110 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 108 rows 116 cols
[2024-05-25 16:39:50] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-25 16:39:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 99 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 16:39:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 16:39:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 26 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-25 16:39:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 161 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 266 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 116/126 places, 108/114 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 373 ms. Remains : 116/126 places, 108/114 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:39:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-25 16:39:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-25 16:39:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 108 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:39:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-25 16:39:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-25 16:39:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality953827400622784404.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:39:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6620422569759500579.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality953827400622784404.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6620422569759500579.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.14573e+09,0.078403,5976,2,1136,5,9160,6,0,574,10936,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX(EX(EF(AX((p120==1))))) + !(E((p105==1) U EG(AG(((p56==0)||(p133==0)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU((Init * !(EX(EX(E(TRUE U !(EX(!((p120==1))))))))),(p105==1)),!(E(TRUE U !(((p56==0)||(p133==0))))))] ...162
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t3, t21, t61, t64, t67, t68, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroye...194
(forward)formula 0,1,4.4075,117156,1,0,265,718593,252,130,3546,523193,299
FORMULA Parking-PT-208-CTLCardinality-2024-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 126/126 places, 114/114 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 124 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 124 transition count 112
Applied a total of 4 rules in 2 ms. Remains 124 /126 variables (removed 2) and now considering 112/114 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 112 rows 124 cols
[2024-05-25 16:39:55] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-25 16:39:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 97 ms returned [35, 61, 63]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 109 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 121/126 places, 112/114 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 119 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 119 transition count 110
Applied a total of 4 rules in 3 ms. Remains 119 /121 variables (removed 2) and now considering 110/112 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 110 rows 119 cols
[2024-05-25 16:39:55] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:39:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 90 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 16:39:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 16:39:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 26 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-25 16:39:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 240 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 348 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 119/126 places, 110/114 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 462 ms. Remains : 119/126 places, 110/114 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:39:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-25 16:39:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-25 16:39:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 110 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:39:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-25 16:39:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-25 16:39:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18013817558693279655.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 16:39:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14180573785937331194.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18013817558693279655.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14180573785937331194.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.33447e+09,0.151588,6524,2,1204,5,10881,6,0,588,13429,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((EF((p46!=1)) * (AX((p70!=1)) + ((AX(FALSE) + (((p30!=0)&&(p16!=1))&&(p104!=0))) * (((p78!=1)||(p70!=1))||((p124!=1)&&(p134!=1)))))) ...312
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((E(TRUE U (p46!=1)) * (!(EX(!((p70!=1)))) + ((!(EX(!(FALSE))) + (((p30!=0)&&(p16!=1))&&(p104!=0)))...375
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t3, t21, t61, t64, t67, t68, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroye...194
(forward)formula 0,0,21.0071,514176,1,0,929,2.87838e+06,259,481,3633,3.51235e+06,943
FORMULA Parking-PT-208-CTLCardinality-2024-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 126/126 places, 114/114 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 126 transition count 110
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 122 transition count 110
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 122 transition count 106
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 118 transition count 106
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 113 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 113 transition count 101
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 111 transition count 99
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 111 transition count 99
Applied a total of 31 rules in 20 ms. Remains 111 /126 variables (removed 15) and now considering 99/114 (removed 15) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 99 rows 111 cols
[2024-05-25 16:40:17] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:40:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 99 ms returned [35, 55, 57, 108]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 100 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 107/126 places, 99/114 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 105 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 105 transition count 97
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 103 transition count 95
Applied a total of 8 rules in 11 ms. Remains 103 /107 variables (removed 4) and now considering 95/99 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 95 rows 103 cols
[2024-05-25 16:40:17] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-25 16:40:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 146 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 16:40:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 16:40:17] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 35 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-25 16:40:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 246 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 394 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 103/126 places, 95/114 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 525 ms. Remains : 103/126 places, 95/114 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:40:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-25 16:40:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-25 16:40:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 95 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:40:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-25 16:40:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-25 16:40:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4697217169984010071.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:40:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8254815408739655391.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4697217169984010071.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8254815408739655391.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.00768e+09,0.094024,5372,2,837,5,6788,6,0,509,7786,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG(A((p109==1) U ((p14==0)||(p31==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!((E(!(((p14==0)||(p31==1))) U (!((p109==1)) * !(((p14==0)||(p31==1))))) + EG(!(((p14==0)|...180
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 89/6/6
(forward)formula 0,1,4.5654,130712,1,0,14,786272,28,10,2565,594129,14
FORMULA Parking-PT-208-CTLCardinality-2024-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 126/126 places, 114/114 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 121 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 121 transition count 109
Applied a total of 10 rules in 2 ms. Remains 121 /126 variables (removed 5) and now considering 109/114 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 109 rows 121 cols
[2024-05-25 16:40:22] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-25 16:40:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 99 ms returned [35, 59, 61, 117]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 100 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 117/126 places, 109/114 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 115 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 115 transition count 107
Applied a total of 4 rules in 2 ms. Remains 115 /117 variables (removed 2) and now considering 107/109 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 107 rows 115 cols
[2024-05-25 16:40:22] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:40:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 86 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 16:40:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 16:40:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 26 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-25 16:40:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 142 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 230 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 115/126 places, 107/114 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 334 ms. Remains : 115/126 places, 107/114 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:40:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-25 16:40:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-25 16:40:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 107 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:40:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-25 16:40:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-25 16:40:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7108539389281925174.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:40:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14799359917458581338.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7108539389281925174.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14799359917458581338.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.62144e+09,0.083201,5712,2,1003,5,8607,6,0,569,9967,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(AF(((!(((p65==1)||(p31==1))) + E((p39==1) U (p109==1))) * !((((E((p54==1) U ((p114==0)||(p10==1))) + (p10==0)) + ((p62==1)||(p127==0)...206
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,!(EG(((p60==1) + !(EX(!((p33==1)))))))) * !(!(EG(!(((!(((p65==1)||(p31==1))) + E((p39==1) U (p109=...375
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t20, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tota...170
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,22.8551,578484,1,0,981,3.22331e+06,262,587,3690,3.80505e+06,1008
FORMULA Parking-PT-208-CTLCardinality-2024-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 126/126 places, 114/114 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 121 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 121 transition count 109
Applied a total of 10 rules in 3 ms. Remains 121 /126 variables (removed 5) and now considering 109/114 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 109 rows 121 cols
[2024-05-25 16:40:45] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:40:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 104 ms returned [35, 59, 117]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 116 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 118/126 places, 109/114 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 116 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 116 transition count 107
Applied a total of 4 rules in 1 ms. Remains 116 /118 variables (removed 2) and now considering 107/109 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 107 rows 116 cols
[2024-05-25 16:40:46] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:40:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 89 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 16:40:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 16:40:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 26 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-25 16:40:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 177 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 268 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 116/126 places, 107/114 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 390 ms. Remains : 116/126 places, 107/114 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:40:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-25 16:40:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 16:40:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 107 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:40:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 16:40:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 16:40:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4863158251478264374.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:40:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4476197757366030253.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4863158251478264374.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4476197757366030253.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.62144e+09,0.086924,5984,2,1031,5,9138,6,0,573,11150,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EF(!(A((p124==0) U ((p66==0)||(p128==1))))) * EX((p128==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * E(TRUE U !(!((E(!(((p66==0)||(p128==1))) U (!((p124==0)) * !(((p66==0)||(p128==1))))) + ...212
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t20, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tota...170
(forward)formula 0,1,12.1302,318392,1,0,722,1.98032e+06,247,338,3572,1.89853e+06,815
FORMULA Parking-PT-208-CTLCardinality-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 126/126 places, 114/114 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 126 transition count 111
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 123 transition count 110
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 122 transition count 110
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 122 transition count 107
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 119 transition count 107
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 114 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 114 transition count 102
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 112 transition count 100
Applied a total of 28 rules in 16 ms. Remains 112 /126 variables (removed 14) and now considering 100/114 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 100 rows 112 cols
[2024-05-25 16:40:58] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:40:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 134 ms returned [35, 55, 57, 109]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 136 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 108/126 places, 100/114 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 107 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 107 transition count 99
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 105 transition count 97
Applied a total of 6 rules in 12 ms. Remains 105 /108 variables (removed 3) and now considering 97/100 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 105 cols
[2024-05-25 16:40:58] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:40:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 123 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 16:40:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 16:40:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 34 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-25 16:40:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 211 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 336 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 105/126 places, 97/114 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 501 ms. Remains : 105/126 places, 97/114 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:40:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-25 16:40:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-25 16:40:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:40:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-25 16:40:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-25 16:40:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12712897029663752994.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 16:40:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15880045063559707883.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12712897029663752994.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15880045063559707883.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.07374e+09,0.085924,5120,2,830,5,6341,6,0,519,6837,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(E(AG((((p38==0)||(p24==1))&&(((!((p29==0)||(p76==1)))||(p120==0))||(p115==1)))) U (AF(EG((p80==1))) * ((p122==0)||(p54==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(!(E(TRUE U !((((p38==0)||(p24==1))&&(((!((p29==0)||(p76==1)))||(p120==0))||(p115==1)))))...219
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,24.8869,608388,1,0,139,3.36314e+06,33,93,2743,3.53521e+06,96
FORMULA Parking-PT-208-CTLCardinality-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 126/126 places, 114/114 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 124 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 124 transition count 112
Applied a total of 4 rules in 2 ms. Remains 124 /126 variables (removed 2) and now considering 112/114 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 112 rows 124 cols
[2024-05-25 16:41:24] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 5 ms
[2024-05-25 16:41:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 103 ms returned [35, 59, 61, 119]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 105 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 120/126 places, 112/114 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 118 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 118 transition count 110
Applied a total of 4 rules in 1 ms. Remains 118 /120 variables (removed 2) and now considering 110/112 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 110 rows 118 cols
[2024-05-25 16:41:24] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:41:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 79 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 16:41:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 16:41:24] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 26 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-25 16:41:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 170 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 250 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 118/126 places, 110/114 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 358 ms. Remains : 118/126 places, 110/114 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:41:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 16:41:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 16:41:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 110 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:41:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 16:41:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 16:41:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13943539837883915446.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:41:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12605943038168046711.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13943539837883915446.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12605943038168046711.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.86925e+09,0.077706,5988,2,1311,5,9175,6,0,584,10648,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(E((A(AF(((p50==0)||(p67==1))) U ((p87==0)||(p133==1))) * AF((p68==1))) U (AX((EX((p97==1)) * (p15==1))) + AX(EX(TRUE)))) U EX((!(EG(((p...202
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(EX((!(EG(((p7==0)||(p71==1)))) * !(EG(!(((p7==0)||(p75==1))))))))))) * !(E(!(EX((!(EG(((p7==0)|...508
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t3, t21, t22, t62, t65, t69, t85, t87, t90, t93, t94, Intersection with reachable at eac...219
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-25 16:41:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 16:41:54] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-25 16:41:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12655286514297951153.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12655286514297951153.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12655286514297951153.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12655286514297951153.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12655286514297951153.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-25 16:41:54] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-25 16:41:54] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-25 16:41:54] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:41:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-25 16:41:54] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-25 16:41:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12262783142125521891.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 16:41:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12959809566064430399.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12262783142125521891.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12959809566064430399.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.86925e+09,0.051032,4904,131,61,1967,1186,344,2839,80,3189,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(E((A(AF(((i4.u14.p50==0)||(i4.u20.p67==1))) U ((i8.i1.u37.p87==0)||(i9.u38.p133==1))) * AF((i4.u20.p68==1))) U (AX((EX((i5.u30.p97==1))...279
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(EX((!(EG(((i3.u3.p7==0)||(i7.u21.p71==1)))) * !(EG(!(((i3.u3.p7==0)||(i5.u23.p75==1))))))))))) ...671
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t65, t90, t93, i2.t94, i2.i1.t87, i4.u20.t21, i4.u20.t22, i8.t69, i8.i1.t62, i8.i1.u37.t85, i...275
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
(forward)formula 0,0,7.97485,207920,1,0,336652,5502,2073,824538,455,26115,306450
FORMULA Parking-PT-208-CTLCardinality-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2024-05-25 16:42:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 16:42:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Total runtime 226397 ms.

BK_STOP 1716655322796

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="Parking-PT-208"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is Parking-PT-208, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r268-smll-171654406800065"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/Parking-PT-208.tgz
mv Parking-PT-208 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;