Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r268-smll-171654406800042.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.....................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is ParamProductionCell-PT-4, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r268-smll-171654406800042
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 684K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.9K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 84K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.1K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 56K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K Apr 23 07:41 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K Apr 23 07:41 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.9K Apr 23 07:41 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Apr 23 07:41 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Apr 12 20:32 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 161K Apr 12 20:32 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.4K Apr 12 20:30 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 55K Apr 12 20:30 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.9K Apr 23 07:41 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K Apr 23 07:41 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 174K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-4-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-4-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-4-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-4-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-4-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-4-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-4-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-4-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-4-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-4-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-4-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-4-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-4-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-4-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-4-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-4-CTLFireability-2023-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716653689995

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ParamProductionCell-PT-4
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-25 16:14:52] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-25 16:14:52] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-25 16:14:52] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 245 ms
[2024-05-25 16:14:52] [INFO ] Transformed 231 places.
[2024-05-25 16:14:52] [INFO ] Transformed 202 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:14:52] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-25 16:14:52] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 231 places and 202 transitions and 846 arcs in 459 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 28 ms.
Support contains 142 out of 231 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 231/231 places, 202/202 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 229 transition count 200
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 229 transition count 200
Applied a total of 4 rules in 45 ms. Remains 229 /231 variables (removed 2) and now considering 200/202 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 200 rows 229 cols
[2024-05-25 16:14:53] [INFO ] Computed 59 invariants in 32 ms
[2024-05-25 16:14:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 717 ms returned [15, 19, 59, 73, 114, 118, 119, 167]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 770 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 221/231 places, 200/202 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 13 ms. Remains 221 /221 variables (removed 0) and now considering 200/200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 858 ms. Remains : 221/231 places, 200/202 transitions.
Support contains 142 out of 221 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-25 16:14:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 89 ms
[2024-05-25 16:14:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 42 ms
[2024-05-25 16:14:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 200 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 85 to 83
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 3055 ms. (13 steps per ms) remains 9/83 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 738 ms. (54 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 239 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 8/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 341 ms. (116 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 409 ms. (97 steps per ms) remains 7/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 135 ms. (294 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 151 ms. (263 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (8 resets) in 131 ms. (303 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 200 rows 221 cols
[2024-05-25 16:14:56] [INFO ] Computed 51 invariants in 13 ms
[2024-05-25 16:14:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp10 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp11 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp57 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp75 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 137/179 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 8/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 3 unsolved
[2024-05-25 16:14:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 232 ms of which 88 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-25 16:14:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 142 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-25 16:14:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 80 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-25 16:14:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 120 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-25 16:14:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 67 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp17 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 5/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 12/191 variables, 5/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/191 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 2 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp2 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 15/206 variables, 13/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 183/389 variables, 206/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/389 variables, 42/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/389 variables, 0/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 17/406 variables, 26/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/406 variables, 0/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 15/421 variables, 15/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/421 variables, 6/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/421 variables, 0/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/421 variables, 0/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 421/421 variables, and 345 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 6 solved, 1 unsolved in 1263 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 30/30 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 221/221 constraints, ReadFeed: 68/68 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 6 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp51 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 141/421 variables, and 11 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 0 unsolved in 87 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/30 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 0/21 constraints, State Equation: 0/221 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/68 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/7 constraints, Known Traps: 0/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 1458ms problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 7 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-4-CTLFireability-2024-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-25 16:14:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2024-05-25 16:14:58] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-4-CTLFireability-2024-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-25 16:14:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2024-05-25 16:14:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 200 transitions.
Support contains 121 out of 221 places (down from 125) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 221/221 places, 200/200 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 217 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 217 transition count 196
Applied a total of 8 rules in 52 ms. Remains 217 /221 variables (removed 4) and now considering 196/200 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 217 cols
[2024-05-25 16:14:58] [INFO ] Computed 51 invariants in 17 ms
[2024-05-25 16:14:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 325 ms returned [15, 17, 22, 29, 33, 34, 39, 40, 44, 45, 61, 62, 74, 75, 94, 95, 97, 109, 111, 153, 155, 157, 182, 183, 186, 187, 192, 193, 197, 208]
Discarding 30 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 327 ms to find 30 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 187/221 places, 196/200 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 185 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 185 transition count 194
Applied a total of 4 rules in 13 ms. Remains 185 /187 variables (removed 2) and now considering 194/196 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 185 cols
[2024-05-25 16:14:58] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-25 16:14:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 124 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 16:14:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 16:14:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-25 16:14:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 330 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 456 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 185/221 places, 194/200 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 849 ms. Remains : 185/221 places, 194/200 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:14:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-25 16:14:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2024-05-25 16:14:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 194 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:14:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-25 16:14:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-25 16:14:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1968289095125067518.gal : 6 ms
[2024-05-25 16:14:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6485003622436537889.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1968289095125067518.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6485003622436537889.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.37202e+06,0.853703,23832,2,9647,5,102107,6,0,937,73315,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AX(EX(((arm1_forward==0)||(A1L_ext_rs==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(!(EX(((arm1_forward==0)||(A1L_ext_rs==0)))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t14, t22, t26, t30, t34, t42, t46, t54, t58, t62, t65, t72, t73, t75, t76, t78, t79,...442
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-25 16:15:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2024-05-25 16:15:29] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-25 16:15:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph796216731118766297.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph796216731118766297.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph796216731118766297.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph796216731118766297.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph796216731118766297.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-25 16:15:29] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-25 16:15:29] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-25 16:15:29] [INFO ] Removed a total of 50 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:15:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 200 ms
[2024-05-25 16:15:29] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 8 ms.
[2024-05-25 16:15:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4994047977413198582.gal : 10 ms
[2024-05-25 16:15:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability533250373506782703.ctl : 7 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4994047977413198582.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability533250373506782703.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.37202e+06,0.132448,6920,678,24,5882,211,539,7674,41,472,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AX(EX(((i9.u54.arm1_forward==0)||(i9.u55.A1L_ext_rs==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(!(EX(((i9.u54.arm1_forward==0)||(i9.u55.A1L_ext_rs==0)))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t65, t136, t158, i0.i0.u10.t14, i0.i1.u2.t10, i0.i1.u9.t6, i1.i0.u3.t22, i1.i0.u6.t34, i1.i0....793
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,6.97033,196472,1,0,500252,211,2722,309526,168,549,1014879
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-4-CTLFireability-2024-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 221/221 places, 200/200 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 218 transition count 197
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 218 transition count 197
Applied a total of 6 rules in 10 ms. Remains 218 /221 variables (removed 3) and now considering 197/200 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 197 rows 218 cols
[2024-05-25 16:15:36] [INFO ] Computed 51 invariants in 5 ms
[2024-05-25 16:15:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 280 ms returned [15, 29, 34, 39, 40, 44, 45, 61, 62, 74, 75, 94, 109, 111, 153, 156, 158, 183, 187, 188, 193, 194, 198, 209]
Discarding 24 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 289 ms to find 24 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 194/221 places, 197/200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 194 /194 variables (removed 0) and now considering 197/197 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 304 ms. Remains : 194/221 places, 197/200 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:15:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-25 16:15:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-25 16:15:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 197 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:15:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-25 16:15:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-25 16:15:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4977197792008285432.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 16:15:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15020268080484138381.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4977197792008285432.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15020268080484138381.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.38353e+06,1.04168,25900,2,10753,5,110177,6,0,976,78532,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF((AF(((A1L_rotated==1)&&(arm1_stop==1))) * E(AX(FALSE) U EX((((crane_pick_up_height==1)&&(CL_lower_run==1))||((robot_stop==1)&&(A1U_ro...464
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !((!((E(!(((crane_mag_on==1)&&(CU_ready_to_ungrasp==1))) U (!(!(E(E(TRUE U ((press_stop==1)&&(PL_i...661
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t14, t22, t26, t30, t34, t42, t46, t54, t58, t62, t65, t71, t72, t73, t75, t77, t79,...448
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-25 16:16:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-25 16:16:07] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-25 16:16:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4278859166271479862.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4278859166271479862.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4278859166271479862.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4278859166271479862.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4278859166271479862.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-25 16:16:07] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-25 16:16:07] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-25 16:16:07] [INFO ] Removed a total of 56 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:16:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 43 ms
[2024-05-25 16:16:07] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 14 ms.
[2024-05-25 16:16:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7493286980137746278.gal : 11 ms
[2024-05-25 16:16:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14161861012691016723.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7493286980137746278.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14161861012691016723.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.38353e+06,0.187287,9432,1098,50,12977,367,610,13269,64,1052,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF((AF(((i7.u48.A1L_rotated==1)&&(i7.u50.arm1_stop==1))) * E(AX(FALSE) U EX((((i9.i0.u59.crane_pick_up_height==1)&&(i9.i0.u66.CL_lower_r...613
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !((!((E(!(((i9.i0.u60.crane_mag_on==1)&&(i9.i0.u63.CU_ready_to_ungrasp==1))) U (!(!(E(E(TRUE U ((i...850
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t14, t62, t71, t75, t94, t116, t154, i0.t10, i0.t6, i1.i0.u15.t26, i1.i1.u17.t30, i1.i1.u18.t...738
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,7.88824,248880,1,0,598259,416,3220,494562,288,1202,861546
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-4-CTLFireability-2024-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 221/221 places, 200/200 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 217 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 217 transition count 196
Applied a total of 8 rules in 11 ms. Remains 217 /221 variables (removed 4) and now considering 196/200 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 217 cols
[2024-05-25 16:16:15] [INFO ] Computed 51 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-25 16:16:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 271 ms returned [15, 17, 22, 29, 33, 34, 39, 40, 44, 45, 61, 62, 75, 94, 95, 97, 109, 111, 152, 153, 155, 157, 182, 183, 186, 187, 192, 193, 197, 208]
Discarding 30 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 275 ms to find 30 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 187/221 places, 196/200 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 185 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 185 transition count 194
Applied a total of 4 rules in 7 ms. Remains 185 /187 variables (removed 2) and now considering 194/196 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 185 cols
[2024-05-25 16:16:15] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-25 16:16:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 192 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 16:16:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 16:16:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-25 16:16:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 444 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 637 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 185/221 places, 194/200 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 930 ms. Remains : 185/221 places, 194/200 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:16:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-25 16:16:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-25 16:16:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 194 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:16:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-25 16:16:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-25 16:16:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2496349306224600027.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 16:16:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6987406290158431244.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2496349306224600027.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6987406290158431244.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.37202e+06,0.752135,23496,2,9374,5,98828,6,0,937,73390,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AX(AF((((belt1_light_barrier_false==1)&&(belt1_start==1))&&(FB_trans_run==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(EX(!(!(EG(!((((belt1_light_barrier_false==1)&&(belt1_start==1))&&(FB_trans_run==1))))))))))] = FA...158
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t14, t22, t26, t30, t34, t42, t46, t54, t58, t62, t65, t72, t73, t75, t76, t78, t79,...442
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-25 16:16:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-25 16:16:46] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-25 16:16:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7583768392663223620.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7583768392663223620.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7583768392663223620.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7583768392663223620.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7583768392663223620.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-25 16:16:46] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-25 16:16:46] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-25 16:16:46] [INFO ] Removed a total of 48 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:16:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2024-05-25 16:16:46] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-25 16:16:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15322899675970349268.gal : 7 ms
[2024-05-25 16:16:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17373613047207225009.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15322899675970349268.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17373613047207225009.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.37202e+06,0.161078,8752,1150,24,11499,219,534,13959,43,451,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AX(AF((((i4.u25.belt1_light_barrier_false==1)&&(i4.u23.belt1_start==1))&&(i4.u24.FB_trans_run==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(EX(!(!(EG(!((((i4.u25.belt1_light_barrier_false==1)&&(i4.u23.belt1_start==1))&&(i4.u24.FB_trans_r...179
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t65, i0.t117, i0.t114, i0.t62, i1.u1.t10, i1.u9.t6, i1.u10.t14, i2.u14.t26, i2.u11.t22, i2.u1...766
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,4.29068,154480,1,0,355669,219,2835,334019,189,517,715787
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-4-CTLFireability-2024-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 221/221 places, 200/200 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 221 transition count 194
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 215 transition count 194
Performed 17 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 17 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 215 transition count 177
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 198 transition count 177
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 194 transition count 173
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 194 transition count 173
Performed 17 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 17
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 177 transition count 156
Applied a total of 88 rules in 64 ms. Remains 177 /221 variables (removed 44) and now considering 156/200 (removed 44) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 156 rows 177 cols
[2024-05-25 16:16:51] [INFO ] Computed 51 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-25 16:16:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 295 ms returned [13, 14, 18, 23, 27, 28, 32, 33, 37, 38, 50, 51, 60, 61, 72, 73, 75, 87, 88, 119, 120, 122, 123, 146, 147, 150, 151, 156, 157, 159, 168]
[2024-05-25 16:16:51] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [73, 75, 72, 32, 37, 50, 60, 87, 88, 119, 120, 122, 150, 151, 159, 14, 18, 23, 33, 38, 51, 61, 156, 157, 168, 146, 147]
Discarding 27 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 300 ms to find 27 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 150/221 places, 156/200 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 12 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 12 transitions
Performed 12 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 12
Iterating post reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 150 transition count 144
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 138 transition count 144
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 138 transition count 141
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 10 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 135 transition count 141
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 133 transition count 139
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 133 transition count 139
Performed 38 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 38
Deduced a syphon composed of 38 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 38 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 76 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 95 transition count 101
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 94 transition count 100
Applied a total of 112 rules in 49 ms. Remains 94 /150 variables (removed 56) and now considering 100/156 (removed 56) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 100 rows 94 cols
[2024-05-25 16:16:51] [INFO ] Computed 24 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-25 16:16:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 132 ms returned [12, 20, 21, 70]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 134 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 90/221 places, 100/200 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 87 transition count 97
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 86 transition count 96
Applied a total of 8 rules in 10 ms. Remains 86 /90 variables (removed 4) and now considering 96/100 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 96 rows 86 cols
[2024-05-25 16:16:51] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:16:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 121 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 16:16:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 16:16:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-25 16:16:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 233 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 362 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 86/221 places, 96/200 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 922 ms. Remains : 86/221 places, 96/200 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:16:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 16:16:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 16:16:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 96 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:16:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 16:16:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 16:16:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10915805545607649596.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:16:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16584029727065581094.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10915805545607649596.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16584029727065581094.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,69780,0.078293,5988,2,2063,5,10954,6,0,443,8838,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF((TL_out==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U (TL_out==0)))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t41, t42, t46, t47, t51, t53, t60, t61, t62, t64, t68, t69, t70, t75, t76, t77, t81, t82, t83...285
(forward)formula 0,1,0.797301,29012,1,0,178,144126,217,100,2879,86590,207
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-4-CTLFireability-2024-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 221/221 places, 200/200 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 221 transition count 194
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 215 transition count 194
Performed 17 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 17 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 215 transition count 177
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 198 transition count 177
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 195 transition count 174
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 195 transition count 174
Performed 18 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 18
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 177 transition count 156
Applied a total of 88 rules in 24 ms. Remains 177 /221 variables (removed 44) and now considering 156/200 (removed 44) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 156 rows 177 cols
[2024-05-25 16:16:52] [INFO ] Computed 51 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-25 16:16:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 233 ms returned [13, 14, 18, 23, 27, 28, 31, 32, 49, 50, 60, 72, 86, 87, 118, 119, 121, 122, 146, 147, 150, 151, 156, 157, 159]
[2024-05-25 16:16:53] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [72, 31, 49, 86, 87, 118, 119, 121, 150, 151, 159, 14, 18, 23, 32, 50, 60, 156, 157, 146, 147]
Discarding 21 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 234 ms to find 21 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 156/221 places, 156/200 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 7 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 7 transitions
Performed 7 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 7
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 156 transition count 149
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 149 transition count 148
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 148 transition count 148
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 148 transition count 144
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 144 transition count 144
Performed 16 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 16
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 128 transition count 128
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 127 transition count 127
Applied a total of 58 rules in 18 ms. Remains 127 /156 variables (removed 29) and now considering 127/156 (removed 29) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 127 rows 127 cols
[2024-05-25 16:16:53] [INFO ] Computed 30 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-25 16:16:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 136 ms returned [12, 20, 21, 94]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 137 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 123/221 places, 127/200 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 121 transition count 125
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 120 transition count 124
Applied a total of 6 rules in 10 ms. Remains 120 /123 variables (removed 3) and now considering 124/127 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 124 rows 120 cols
[2024-05-25 16:16:53] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:16:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 121 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 16:16:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 16:16:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-25 16:16:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 332 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 462 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 120/221 places, 124/200 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 886 ms. Remains : 120/221 places, 124/200 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:16:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 16:16:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-25 16:16:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 124 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:16:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-25 16:16:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 16:16:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16184921234864652842.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 16:16:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3525494070636137477.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16184921234864652842.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3525494070636137477.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,119021,0.205743,9932,2,4635,5,28094,6,0,607,23716,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((((!((((AG(((arm1_release_angle==1)&&(A1U_rot2_run==1))) * (arm1_retract_ext==1)) * (A1L_ret_run==1)) + !(((((crane_above_deposit_belt=...545
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(FwdU(Init,(((!((((!(E(TRUE U !(((arm1_release_angle==1)&&(A1U_rot2_run==1))))) * (arm1_retract_ext==1)) *...622
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t9, t20, t25, t26, t29, t31, t32, t39, t40, t42, t43, t46, t53, t54, t56, t57, t59, t60, t69,...378
(forward)formula 0,1,2.70971,80660,1,0,245,342003,285,129,3907,213100,273
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-4-CTLFireability-2024-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 221/221 places, 200/200 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 217 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 217 transition count 196
Applied a total of 8 rules in 6 ms. Remains 217 /221 variables (removed 4) and now considering 196/200 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 217 cols
[2024-05-25 16:16:56] [INFO ] Computed 51 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-25 16:16:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 380 ms returned [15, 17, 22, 29, 33, 34, 39, 40, 44, 61, 62, 74, 75, 94, 97, 109, 111, 153, 155, 157, 182, 183, 186, 187, 192, 193, 197, 208]
Discarding 28 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 382 ms to find 28 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 189/221 places, 196/200 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 187 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 187 transition count 194
Applied a total of 4 rules in 5 ms. Remains 187 /189 variables (removed 2) and now considering 194/196 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 187 cols
[2024-05-25 16:16:56] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 9 ms
[2024-05-25 16:16:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 214 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 16:16:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 16:16:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-25 16:16:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 430 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 646 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 187/221 places, 194/200 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 1040 ms. Remains : 187/221 places, 194/200 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:16:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-25 16:16:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-25 16:16:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 194 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:16:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-25 16:16:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-25 16:16:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability891462753962430186.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:16:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18270595351938682828.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability891462753962430186.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18270595351938682828.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.37202e+06,0.661886,23412,2,9444,5,98516,6,0,945,71337,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E(!(((table_at_load_angle==1)&&(table_stop_v==1))) U AX(((((((arm1_retract_ext==1)&&(arm1_forward==1))&&(A1U_ext_run==1))||((ch_FT_free...289
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(((table_at_load_angle==1)&&(table_stop_v==1)))) * !(EX(!(((((((arm1_retract_ext==1)&&(arm1_forward...337
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t14, t22, t26, t30, t34, t42, t46, t54, t58, t62, t65, t72, t73, t75, t76, t78, t79,...442
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 189/0/5
(forward)formula 0,1,8.34123,223876,1,0,345,1.03359e+06,413,199,5591,679425,398
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-4-CTLFireability-2024-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 221/221 places, 200/200 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 217 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 217 transition count 196
Applied a total of 8 rules in 3 ms. Remains 217 /221 variables (removed 4) and now considering 196/200 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 217 cols
[2024-05-25 16:17:05] [INFO ] Computed 51 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-25 16:17:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 266 ms returned [15, 22, 29, 33, 39, 40, 45, 61, 62, 74, 75, 94, 97, 109, 152, 153, 155, 157, 182, 183, 186, 187, 192, 193, 197, 208]
Discarding 26 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 267 ms to find 26 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 191/221 places, 196/200 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 189 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 189 transition count 194
Applied a total of 4 rules in 3 ms. Remains 189 /191 variables (removed 2) and now considering 194/196 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 189 cols
[2024-05-25 16:17:06] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:17:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 170 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 16:17:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 16:17:06] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-25 16:17:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 511 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 692 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 189/221 places, 194/200 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 966 ms. Remains : 189/221 places, 194/200 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:17:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-25 16:17:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-25 16:17:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 194 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:17:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-25 16:17:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-25 16:17:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16873977490361002294.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 16:17:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3316531112601792111.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16873977490361002294.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3316531112601792111.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.37202e+06,0.934401,23676,2,9916,5,99460,6,0,953,73126,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((((press_stop==1)&&(PU_in==1)) * ((AX(AX(((table_upward==1)&&(TU_lift_rs==1)))) + AX(AF(((robot_stop==0)||(A1L_rot3_in==0))))) + (((ar...322
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((((press_stop==1)&&(PU_in==1)) * ((!(EX(!(!(EX(!(((table_upward==1)&&(TU_lift_rs==1)))))))) + !(EX(...391
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t14, t22, t26, t30, t34, t42, t46, t54, t58, t62, t65, t72, t73, t75, t76, t78, t79,...442
(forward)formula 0,1,10.5924,289796,1,0,960,1.47059e+06,419,525,5503,1.0256e+06,1017
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-4-CTLFireability-2024-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 221/221 places, 200/200 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 217 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 217 transition count 196
Applied a total of 8 rules in 4 ms. Remains 217 /221 variables (removed 4) and now considering 196/200 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 217 cols
[2024-05-25 16:17:17] [INFO ] Computed 51 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-25 16:17:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 271 ms returned [15, 29, 33, 34, 40, 44, 45, 61, 62, 74, 75, 94, 97, 109, 152, 153, 155, 157, 182, 183, 187, 197, 208]
Discarding 23 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 272 ms to find 23 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 194/221 places, 196/200 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 192 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 192 transition count 194
Applied a total of 4 rules in 4 ms. Remains 192 /194 variables (removed 2) and now considering 194/196 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 192 cols
[2024-05-25 16:17:17] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-25 16:17:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 149 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 16:17:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 16:17:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-25 16:17:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 433 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 584 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 192/221 places, 194/200 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 864 ms. Remains : 192/221 places, 194/200 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:17:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-25 16:17:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-25 16:17:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 194 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:17:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-25 16:17:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-25 16:17:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12753212835082642770.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 16:17:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8803438747815014251.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12753212835082642770.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8803438747815014251.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.37202e+06,1.02944,25552,2,10295,5,106127,6,0,965,81021,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(E((((A(((robot_stop==1)&&(A1L_rot3_in==1)) U (TL_out==1)) * A((arm1_having_swivel_1==1) U ((swivel==1)&&(arm1_waiting_for_swivel_2==1)...727
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(!(E((((!((E(!((TL_out==1)) U (!(((robot_stop==1)&&(A1L_rot3_in==1))) * !((TL_out==1)))) + EG(!((...969
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t14, t22, t26, t30, t34, t42, t46, t54, t58, t62, t65, t72, t73, t75, t76, t78, t79,...442
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-25 16:17:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-25 16:17:48] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-25 16:17:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13745967896130492645.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13745967896130492645.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13745967896130492645.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13745967896130492645.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13745967896130492645.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-25 16:17:48] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-25 16:17:48] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-25 16:17:48] [INFO ] Removed a total of 40 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:17:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-05-25 16:17:48] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-25 16:17:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10771131774769917327.gal : 10 ms
[2024-05-25 16:17:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4512368303030512850.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10771131774769917327.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4512368303030512850.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.37202e+06,0.129566,7528,734,83,7358,446,569,10195,97,1149,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(E((((A(((i6.u32.robot_stop==1)&&(i6.u44.A1L_rot3_in==1)) U (i2.i1.u6.TL_out==1)) * A((i8.i0.u45.arm1_having_swivel_1==1) U ((i6.u30.sw...953
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(!(E((((!((E(!((i2.i1.u6.TL_out==1)) U (!(((i6.u32.robot_stop==1)&&(i6.u44.A1L_rot3_in==1))) * !(...1247
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t62, t65, t114, t117, t175, t188, i1.t14, i1.t6, i2.i0.t22, i2.i0.t34, i2.i0.u18.t30, i2...694
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,7.80574,301360,1,0,759186,878,3522,505063,505,2100,947833
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-4-CTLFireability-2024-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 221/221 places, 200/200 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 218 transition count 197
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 218 transition count 197
Applied a total of 6 rules in 4 ms. Remains 218 /221 variables (removed 3) and now considering 197/200 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 197 rows 218 cols
[2024-05-25 16:17:56] [INFO ] Computed 51 invariants in 5 ms
[2024-05-25 16:17:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 224 ms returned [15, 17, 22, 29, 33, 34, 39, 40, 44, 45, 61, 62, 74, 75, 94, 111, 153, 154, 158, 183, 184, 187, 188, 194, 209]
Discarding 25 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 229 ms to find 25 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 193/221 places, 197/200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 193 /193 variables (removed 0) and now considering 197/197 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 236 ms. Remains : 193/221 places, 197/200 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:17:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-25 16:17:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-25 16:17:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 197 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:17:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-25 16:17:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-25 16:17:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17307731132978308321.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:17:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12357673284045737919.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17307731132978308321.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12357673284045737919.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.38911e+06,0.770122,26864,2,10990,5,113074,6,0,972,82628,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AG(E(!((AX(((robot_stop==1)&&(A2L_rot2_in==1))) * A((A1U_out==1) U (((crane_above_feed_belt==1)&&(crane_to_belt2==1))&&(CU_trans_run==1...470
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(FwdU(Init,!(E(TRUE U !(E(!((!(EX(!(((robot_stop==1)&&(A2L_rot2_in==1))))) * !((E(!((((crane_above_feed_be...716
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t14, t22, t26, t30, t34, t42, t46, t54, t58, t62, t65, t71, t72, t73, t75, t77, t79,...447
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-25 16:18:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-25 16:18:26] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-25 16:18:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5054335444259466663.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5054335444259466663.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5054335444259466663.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5054335444259466663.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5054335444259466663.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-25 16:18:27] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-25 16:18:27] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-25 16:18:27] [INFO ] Removed a total of 58 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:18:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2024-05-25 16:18:27] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2024-05-25 16:18:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3295588771990033932.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 16:18:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13034905926210163334.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3295588771990033932.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13034905926210163334.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.38911e+06,0.138413,7804,691,49,8544,339,529,9026,53,1085,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AG(E(!((AX(((i6.u35.robot_stop==1)&&(i6.u29.A2L_rot2_in==1))) * A((i7.u57.A1U_out==1) U (((i8.i1.u60.crane_above_feed_belt==1)&&(i8.i1....618
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(FwdU(Init,!(E(TRUE U !(E(!((!(EX(!(((i6.u35.robot_stop==1)&&(i6.u29.A2L_rot2_in==1))))) * !((E(!((((i8.i1...924
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t71, t75, t119, t154, i0.i0.u2.t10, i0.i0.u10.t6, i0.i1.u7.t14, i1.i0.u6.t34, i1.i0.u12.t22, ...737
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,4.24851,125548,1,0,313002,498,3919,275699,276,1641,376846
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-4-CTLFireability-2024-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 221/221 places, 200/200 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 217 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 217 transition count 196
Applied a total of 8 rules in 5 ms. Remains 217 /221 variables (removed 4) and now considering 196/200 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 217 cols
[2024-05-25 16:18:31] [INFO ] Computed 51 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-25 16:18:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 454 ms returned [15, 17, 22, 29, 33, 34, 39, 40, 44, 45, 61, 62, 74, 75, 94, 97, 109, 111, 152, 153, 155, 157, 182, 183, 186, 187, 192, 193, 197, 208]
Discarding 30 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 456 ms to find 30 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 187/221 places, 196/200 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 185 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 185 transition count 194
Applied a total of 4 rules in 6 ms. Remains 185 /187 variables (removed 2) and now considering 194/196 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 185 cols
[2024-05-25 16:18:31] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:18:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 233 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 16:18:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 16:18:32] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-25 16:18:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 420 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 655 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 185/221 places, 194/200 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 1123 ms. Remains : 185/221 places, 194/200 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:18:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-25 16:18:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-25 16:18:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 194 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:18:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-25 16:18:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-25 16:18:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17720964118285141851.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 16:18:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2369389510045607713.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17720964118285141851.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2369389510045607713.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.37202e+06,1.05962,25820,2,10836,5,111170,6,0,937,77867,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(A(((robot_stop==1)&&(A1L_rot2_in==1)) U ((ch_FT_free==1)&&(feed_belt_occupied==1)))) * (EX(EG(((arm2_release_angle==0)||(A2L_in==0))))...217
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(EY((Init * !(!((E(!(((ch_FT_free==1)&&(feed_belt_occupied==1))) U (!(((robot_stop==1)&&(A1L_rot2_in==1)))...597
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t14, t22, t26, t30, t34, t42, t46, t54, t58, t62, t65, t72, t73, t75, t76, t78, t79,...442
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-25 16:19:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 16:19:02] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-25 16:19:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8082179866192184873.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8082179866192184873.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8082179866192184873.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8082179866192184873.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8082179866192184873.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-25 16:19:02] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-25 16:19:02] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-25 16:19:02] [INFO ] Removed a total of 34 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:19:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-25 16:19:02] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-25 16:19:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14322033241470121944.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 16:19:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8849296089515224786.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14322033241470121944.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8849296089515224786.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.37202e+06,0.167913,8788,812,71,10267,464,552,16831,74,1656,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(A(((i4.u32.robot_stop==1)&&(i4.u44.A1L_rot2_in==1)) U ((i1.i0.u5.ch_FT_free==1)&&(i8.i0.u0.feed_belt_occupied==1)))) * (EX(EG(((i4.u31...277
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(EY((Init * !(!((E(!(((i1.i0.u5.ch_FT_free==1)&&(i8.i0.u0.feed_belt_occupied==1))) U (!(((i4.u32.robot_sto...761
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t117, i0.u6.t14, i0.u9.t6, i0.u10.t10, i1.i0.u13.t26, i1.i1.u15.t34, i1.i1.u16.t30, i2.u23.t5...782
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,6.91121,200188,1,0,468549,823,3535,384751,370,2254,619687
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-4-CTLFireability-2024-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 221/221 places, 200/200 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 217 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 217 transition count 196
Applied a total of 8 rules in 3 ms. Remains 217 /221 variables (removed 4) and now considering 196/200 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 217 cols
[2024-05-25 16:19:09] [INFO ] Computed 51 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:19:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 301 ms returned [17, 22, 33, 34, 39, 40, 44, 45, 62, 74, 75, 94, 95, 97, 111, 152, 153, 155, 182, 183, 187, 192, 193, 197, 208]
Discarding 25 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 304 ms to find 25 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 192/221 places, 196/200 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 190 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 190 transition count 194
Applied a total of 4 rules in 4 ms. Remains 190 /192 variables (removed 2) and now considering 194/196 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 190 cols
[2024-05-25 16:19:09] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:19:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 133 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 16:19:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 16:19:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-25 16:19:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 369 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 504 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 190/221 places, 194/200 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 817 ms. Remains : 190/221 places, 194/200 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:19:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-25 16:19:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-25 16:19:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 194 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:19:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-25 16:19:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 16:19:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3971174074770857697.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:19:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16268947093946653362.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3971174074770857697.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16268947093946653362.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.37202e+06,0.998529,23828,2,9133,5,99132,6,0,957,75030,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E((((AX(((table_unload_angle==1)&&(TU_rot_run==1))) * (press_at_lower_pos==1)) * ((press_up==1)&&(PL_lower_run==1))) + (AF((((arm2_retr...519
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,(((!(EX(!(((table_unload_angle==1)&&(TU_rot_run==1))))) * (press_at_lower_pos==1)) * ((press_up==1)...1344
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t14, t22, t26, t30, t34, t42, t46, t54, t58, t62, t65, t72, t73, t75, t76, t78, t79,...442
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-25 16:19:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-25 16:19:40] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-25 16:19:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16621237272482943542.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16621237272482943542.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16621237272482943542.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16621237272482943542.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16621237272482943542.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-25 16:19:40] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-25 16:19:40] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-25 16:19:40] [INFO ] Removed a total of 52 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:19:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-05-25 16:19:40] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-25 16:19:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6413742826852147336.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 16:19:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9530138179932362391.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6413742826852147336.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9530138179932362391.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.37202e+06,0.244345,10704,1426,29,15710,208,542,12499,41,454,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E((((AX(((i1.i0.u15.table_unload_angle==1)&&(i1.i0.u6.TU_rot_run==1))) * (i0.i1.u9.press_at_lower_pos==1)) * ((i0.i0.u11.press_up==1)&&...700
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,(((!(EX(!(((i1.i0.u15.table_unload_angle==1)&&(i1.i0.u6.TU_rot_run==1))))) * (i0.i1.u9.press_at_low...1775
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t62, t84, t106, i0.i0.t14, i0.i1.u2.t10, i0.i1.u10.t6, i1.i0.u6.t34, i1.i0.u14.t22, i1.i0.u18...751
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,25.1705,806504,1,0,1.97272e+06,282,4126,1.46326e+06,217,813,4330818
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-4-CTLFireability-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 221/221 places, 200/200 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 221 transition count 194
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 215 transition count 194
Performed 17 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 17 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 215 transition count 177
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 198 transition count 177
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 194 transition count 173
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 194 transition count 173
Performed 18 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 18
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 176 transition count 155
Applied a total of 90 rules in 27 ms. Remains 176 /221 variables (removed 45) and now considering 155/200 (removed 45) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 155 rows 176 cols
[2024-05-25 16:20:05] [INFO ] Computed 51 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-25 16:20:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 238 ms returned [13, 14, 23, 27, 28, 32, 36, 37, 49, 50, 60, 71, 72, 74, 86, 87, 118, 119, 121, 122, 145, 146, 149, 150, 155, 156, 167]
[2024-05-25 16:20:06] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [72, 74, 71, 36, 49, 86, 87, 118, 119, 121, 149, 150, 14, 23, 32, 37, 50, 60, 155, 156, 167, 145, 146]
Discarding 23 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 239 ms to find 23 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 153/221 places, 155/200 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 5 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 5 transitions
Performed 5 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 153 transition count 150
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 148 transition count 145
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 143 transition count 145
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 143 transition count 141
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 139 transition count 141
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 137 transition count 139
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 137 transition count 139
Performed 31 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 31
Deduced a syphon composed of 31 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 31 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 62 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 106 transition count 108
Applied a total of 94 rules in 16 ms. Remains 106 /153 variables (removed 47) and now considering 108/155 (removed 47) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 108 rows 106 cols
[2024-05-25 16:20:06] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-25 16:20:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 177 ms returned [13, 23, 24, 78]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 178 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 102/221 places, 108/200 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 100 transition count 106
Applied a total of 4 rules in 5 ms. Remains 100 /102 variables (removed 2) and now considering 106/108 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 106 rows 100 cols
[2024-05-25 16:20:06] [INFO ] Computed 24 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:20:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 161 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 16:20:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 16:20:06] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-25 16:20:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 368 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 532 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 100/221 places, 106/200 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 998 ms. Remains : 100/221 places, 106/200 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:20:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 16:20:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 16:20:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 106 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:20:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 16:20:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 16:20:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3563534873509467449.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:20:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15918420305626678537.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3563534873509467449.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15918420305626678537.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,114450,0.40354,11900,2,4002,5,38971,6,0,509,32751,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((A(AF(((crane_above_feed_belt==1)&&(CL_trans_run==1))) U (((crane_transport_height==1)&&(crane_lower==1))&&(CL_lower_run==1))) * !(A(!...336
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG((FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!((((crane_transport_height==1)&&(crane_lower==1))&&(CL_lower_run==1)))) * !((((cr...811
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t17, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t56, t57, t60, t61, t62, t63, t64, t66, t74, t75, t76, t78, t82...319
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 95/0/11
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 95/0/11
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 102/0/4
(forward)formula 0,1,13.4843,324408,1,0,352,1.99555e+06,263,206,3446,1.48347e+06,472
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-4-CTLFireability-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 221/221 places, 200/200 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 221 transition count 194
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 215 transition count 194
Performed 17 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 17 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 215 transition count 177
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 198 transition count 177
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 194 transition count 173
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 194 transition count 173
Performed 18 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 18
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 176 transition count 155
Applied a total of 90 rules in 16 ms. Remains 176 /221 variables (removed 45) and now considering 155/200 (removed 45) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 155 rows 176 cols
[2024-05-25 16:20:20] [INFO ] Computed 51 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 16:20:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 356 ms returned [13, 14, 18, 23, 27, 28, 31, 32, 36, 37, 49, 50, 59, 60, 71, 72, 74, 86, 87, 118, 119, 122, 145, 146, 149, 150, 155, 156, 167]
[2024-05-25 16:20:20] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [72, 74, 71, 31, 36, 49, 59, 86, 87, 118, 119, 149, 150, 14, 18, 23, 32, 37, 50, 60, 155, 156, 167, 145, 146]
Discarding 25 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 359 ms to find 25 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 151/221 places, 155/200 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 151 transition count 145
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 141 transition count 143
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 139 transition count 143
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 139 transition count 140
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 136 transition count 140
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 134 transition count 138
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 134 transition count 138
Performed 34 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 34
Deduced a syphon composed of 34 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 34 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 68 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 100 transition count 104
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 99 transition count 103
Applied a total of 104 rules in 27 ms. Remains 99 /151 variables (removed 52) and now considering 103/155 (removed 52) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 103 rows 99 cols
[2024-05-25 16:20:20] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-25 16:20:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 180 ms returned [12, 20, 21, 69]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 181 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 95/221 places, 103/200 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 93 transition count 101
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 92 transition count 100
Applied a total of 6 rules in 5 ms. Remains 92 /95 variables (removed 3) and now considering 100/103 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 100 rows 92 cols
[2024-05-25 16:20:21] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-25 16:20:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 174 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 16:20:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 16:20:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-25 16:20:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 371 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 547 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 92/221 places, 100/200 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 1135 ms. Remains : 92/221 places, 100/200 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:20:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 16:20:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 16:20:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 100 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 236 steps (0 resets) in 7 ms. (29 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-4-CTLFireability-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2024-05-25 16:20:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 16:20:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-25 16:20:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality1740020675919276969.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 16:20:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality11667882891994657671.prop : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality1740020675919276969.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality11667882891994657671.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 221/221 places, 200/200 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 217 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 217 transition count 196
Applied a total of 8 rules in 6 ms. Remains 217 /221 variables (removed 4) and now considering 196/200 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 217 cols
[2024-05-25 16:20:21] [INFO ] Computed 51 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-25 16:20:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 309 ms returned [15, 17, 22, 29, 33, 34, 39, 40, 44, 45, 61, 62, 74, 95, 109, 111, 155, 157, 183, 186, 192, 193, 197]
Discarding 23 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 310 ms to find 23 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 194/221 places, 196/200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 194 /194 variables (removed 0) and now considering 196/196 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 318 ms. Remains : 194/221 places, 196/200 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:20:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 16:20:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-25 16:20:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 196 transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:20:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 16:20:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 16:20:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3424346058051984999.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 16:20:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability132062116465319702.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3424346058051984999.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability132062116465319702.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.3776e+06,1.18894,28268,2,11640,5,115359,6,0,975,86676,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((!((EX((((belt1_stop==1)&&(FB_at_end==1))||(arm1_having_swivel_2==1))) + ((DB_out!=1) * EF((((arm1_retract_ext==1)&&(arm1_forward==1))&...498
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !(!(E(((crane_mag_off==1)&&(CL_ready_to_grasp==1)) U ((arm1_stop==1)&&(A1U_rotated==...1559
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t14, t22, t26, t30, t34, t42, t46, t54, t58, t62, t65, t71, t72, t73, t75, t77, t79,...447
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-25 16:20:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-25 16:20:52] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-25 16:20:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7052880874210912834.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7052880874210912834.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7052880874210912834.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7052880874210912834.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7052880874210912834.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-25 16:20:52] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-25 16:20:52] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-25 16:20:52] [INFO ] Removed a total of 44 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-25 16:20:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-25 16:20:52] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 8 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2024-05-25 16:20:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2527137050126878719.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 16:20:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9843704935645281025.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2527137050126878719.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9843704935645281025.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.3776e+06,0.512583,19772,1245,135,29490,3535,649,56327,105,17375,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((!((EX((((i0.i1.u26.belt1_stop==1)&&(i0.i1.u28.FB_at_end==1))||(i2.i1.u43.arm1_having_swivel_2==1))) + ((i4.u24.DB_out!=1) * EF((((i8.u...683
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !(!(E(((i9.u57.crane_mag_off==1)&&(i9.u64.CL_ready_to_grasp==1)) U ((i8.u48.arm1_sto...2106
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t115, t137, t160, i0.i0.u16.t34, i0.i1.t54, i0.i1.t58, i1.u7.t6, i1.u8.t10, i2.t62, i2.i1.t11...807
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,10.0639,300404,1,0,701504,3535,3918,600094,546,17375,1252000
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-4-CTLFireability-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2024-05-25 16:21:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-25 16:21:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Total runtime 369922 ms.

BK_STOP 1716654062465

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ParamProductionCell-PT-4"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ParamProductionCell-PT-4, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r268-smll-171654406800042"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ParamProductionCell-PT-4.tgz
mv ParamProductionCell-PT-4 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;