Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r268-smll-171654406700017.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is ParamProductionCell-PT-1, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r268-smll-171654406700017
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 752K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.3K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 79K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.2K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 47K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K Apr 23 07:41 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K Apr 23 07:41 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.0K Apr 23 07:41 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Apr 23 07:41 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K Apr 12 20:35 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 183K Apr 12 20:35 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Apr 12 20:33 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 112K Apr 12 20:33 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.9K Apr 23 07:41 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K Apr 23 07:41 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 174K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLCardinality-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLCardinality-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLCardinality-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLCardinality-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLCardinality-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLCardinality-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLCardinality-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLCardinality-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLCardinality-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLCardinality-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLCardinality-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLCardinality-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLCardinality-2023-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716651532058

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ParamProductionCell-PT-1
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-25 15:38:54] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-25 15:38:54] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-25 15:38:55] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 326 ms
[2024-05-25 15:38:55] [INFO ] Transformed 231 places.
[2024-05-25 15:38:55] [INFO ] Transformed 202 transitions.
[2024-05-25 15:38:55] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-25 15:38:55] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 231 places and 202 transitions and 846 arcs in 563 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 33 ms.
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLCardinality-2024-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 89 out of 231 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 231/231 places, 202/202 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 229 transition count 200
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 229 transition count 200
Applied a total of 4 rules in 82 ms. Remains 229 /231 variables (removed 2) and now considering 200/202 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 200 rows 229 cols
[2024-05-25 15:38:55] [INFO ] Computed 59 invariants in 40 ms
[2024-05-25 15:38:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 774 ms returned [1, 16, 31, 35, 36, 41, 42, 46, 47, 59, 64, 65, 99, 114, 115, 117, 119, 120, 168, 195, 198, 204, 205, 209, 220]
Discarding 25 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 860 ms to find 25 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 204/231 places, 200/202 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 15 ms. Remains 204 /204 variables (removed 0) and now considering 200/200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 998 ms. Remains : 204/231 places, 200/202 transitions.
Support contains 89 out of 204 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-25 15:38:56] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 2 formulas.
[2024-05-25 15:38:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 91 ms
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLCardinality-2024-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLCardinality-2024-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-25 15:38:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 37 ms
[2024-05-25 15:38:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 200 transitions.
Support contains 80 out of 204 places (down from 89) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 2931 ms. (13 steps per ms) remains 14/55 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (8 resets) in 809 ms. (49 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 305 ms. (130 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 286 ms. (139 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 257 ms. (155 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (8 resets) in 172 ms. (231 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 268 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 181 ms. (219 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 223 ms. (178 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 228 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 191 ms. (208 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 103 ms. (384 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (8 resets) in 210 ms. (189 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (8 resets) in 190 ms. (209 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 253 ms. (157 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 200 rows 204 cols
[2024-05-25 15:38:59] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 7 ms
[2024-05-25 15:38:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 141/168 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 2/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 2/170 variables, 2/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp34 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp44 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 12/182 variables, 9/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 167/349 variables, 182/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 6/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 0/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 33/382 variables, 62/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 0/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 22/404 variables, 22/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/404 variables, 8/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/404 variables, 0/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/404 variables, 0/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 12 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 404/404 variables, and 306 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 12 unsolved in 2108 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 204/204 constraints, ReadFeed: 68/68 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 2 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 147/167 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 2/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 12 unsolved
[2024-05-25 15:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 76 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-25 15:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 65 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp2 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp35 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 2/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 3/170 variables, 3/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 10 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp9 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp36 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 12/182 variables, 9/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 167/349 variables, 182/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 6/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 33/382 variables, 62/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 0/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 22/404 variables, 22/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/404 variables, 8/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/404 variables, 8/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 8 unsolved
[2024-05-25 15:39:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 91 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-25 15:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 89 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-25 15:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 94 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-25 15:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 85 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-25 15:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 83 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-25 15:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 88 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-25 15:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 86 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp8 is UNSAT
[2024-05-25 15:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 88 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-25 15:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 88 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp10 is UNSAT
[2024-05-25 15:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 145 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-25 15:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 81 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-25 15:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 80 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp13 is UNSAT
[2024-05-25 15:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 87 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-25 15:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 90 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-25 15:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 89 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-25 15:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 112 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp14 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp15 is UNSAT
[2024-05-25 15:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 65 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-25 15:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 65 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-25 15:39:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 61 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp19 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp32 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp42 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 404/404 variables, and 335 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 14 solved, 0 unsolved in 3611 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 204/204 constraints, ReadFeed: 68/68 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 8/14 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints]
After SMT, in 5792ms problems are : Problem set: 14 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 14 atomic propositions for a total of 13 simplifications.
[2024-05-25 15:39:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:05] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 2 formulas.
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLCardinality-2024-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLCardinality-2024-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-25 15:39:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 200 transitions.
Support contains 57 out of 204 places (down from 60) after GAL structural reductions.
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLCardinality-2024-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 204/204 places, 200/200 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 200 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 200 transition count 196
Applied a total of 8 rules in 24 ms. Remains 200 /204 variables (removed 4) and now considering 196/200 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 200 cols
[2024-05-25 15:39:05] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 5 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 218 ms returned [14, 16, 17, 22, 61, 66, 67, 86, 88, 141, 142, 146, 169, 171, 174]
Discarding 15 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 221 ms to find 15 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 185/204 places, 196/200 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 183 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 183 transition count 194
Applied a total of 4 rules in 10 ms. Remains 183 /185 variables (removed 2) and now considering 194/196 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 183 cols
[2024-05-25 15:39:05] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 109 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 15:39:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 15:39:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-25 15:39:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 342 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 458 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 183/204 places, 194/200 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 713 ms. Remains : 183/204 places, 194/200 transitions.
[2024-05-25 15:39:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 194 transitions.
[2024-05-25 15:39:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6113607237566082118.gal : 10 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10725322691281785401.ctl : 4 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6113607237566082118.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10725322691281785401.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25632,0.143056,6964,2,2920,5,15376,6,0,929,9471,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(E(((A(EX((A1L_in==1)) U EF(((arm1_storing==0)||(A2U_rotated==1)))) * EX(TRUE)) * AF((table_at_load_angle==1))) U !(AG(((crane_above_de...338
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * !(!(E(((!((E(!(E(TRUE U ((arm1_storing==0)||(A2U_rotated==1)))) U (!(EX((A1L_in==1))) * !(E(TRUE U ...541
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t14, t22, t26, t30, t34, t42, t46, t54, t58, t65, t79, t84, t88, t98, t106, t110, t1...332
(forward)formula 0,1,1.67067,55160,1,0,312,160176,383,193,4993,113093,451
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLCardinality-2024-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 204/204 places, 200/200 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 200 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 200 transition count 196
Applied a total of 8 rules in 14 ms. Remains 200 /204 variables (removed 4) and now considering 196/200 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 200 cols
[2024-05-25 15:39:07] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 342 ms returned [14, 16, 17, 22, 61, 66, 67, 86, 88, 141, 142, 144, 146, 169, 171, 174]
Discarding 16 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 350 ms to find 16 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 184/204 places, 196/200 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 182 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 182 transition count 194
Applied a total of 4 rules in 12 ms. Remains 182 /184 variables (removed 2) and now considering 194/196 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 182 cols
[2024-05-25 15:39:08] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 237 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 15:39:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 15:39:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-25 15:39:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 391 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 631 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 182/204 places, 194/200 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 1014 ms. Remains : 182/204 places, 194/200 transitions.
[2024-05-25 15:39:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 194 transitions.
[2024-05-25 15:39:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6000775995249501925.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3494395360884078382.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6000775995249501925.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3494395360884078382.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25632,0.124011,7004,2,2888,5,15249,6,0,925,9370,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG((A2U_ret_rs==0)) * AX(EX(TRUE)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(EG((A2U_ret_rs==0))))] = FALSE * [(EY(Init) * !(EX(TRUE)))] = FALSE)
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t14, t22, t26, t30, t34, t42, t46, t54, t58, t65, t79, t84, t88, t98, t106, t110, t1...332
(forward)formula 0,0,5.48097,164692,1,0,1128,1.04067e+06,378,519,4933,726986,1434
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLCardinality-2024-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 204/204 places, 200/200 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 200 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 200 transition count 196
Applied a total of 8 rules in 14 ms. Remains 200 /204 variables (removed 4) and now considering 196/200 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 200 cols
[2024-05-25 15:39:14] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 262 ms returned [61, 66, 67, 86, 88, 144, 146, 169, 171, 174]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 265 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 190/204 places, 196/200 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 188 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 188 transition count 194
Applied a total of 4 rules in 12 ms. Remains 188 /190 variables (removed 2) and now considering 194/196 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 188 cols
[2024-05-25 15:39:14] [INFO ] Computed 24 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 179 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 15:39:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 15:39:15] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-25 15:39:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 442 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 624 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 188/204 places, 194/200 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 916 ms. Remains : 188/204 places, 194/200 transitions.
[2024-05-25 15:39:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 194 transitions.
[2024-05-25 15:39:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16557289261424278879.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13421775610787241814.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16557289261424278879.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13421775610787241814.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25632,0.122254,7104,2,2859,5,14461,6,0,949,9285,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((((!(A(AX((press_stop==0)) U !(AX((A2U_ret_rs==0))))) + EG((((A2L_rot3_run==0)&&(TU_rot_rs==0))&&((arm1_forward==0)||(CL_out==1))))) +...381
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(((!(!((E(!(!(!(EX(!((A2U_ret_rs==0)))))) U (!(!(EX(!((press_stop==0))))) * !(!(!(EX(!((A2U_ret_rs==0...545
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t14, t22, t26, t30, t34, t42, t46, t54, t58, t65, t79, t84, t88, t98, t106, t110, t1...332
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,15.3307,384676,1,0,2637,2.71079e+06,408,1313,5975,1.89396e+06,3091
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLCardinality-2024-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 204/204 places, 200/200 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 17 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 17 transitions
Performed 17 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 17
Iterating post reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 204 transition count 183
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 187 transition count 183
Performed 15 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 15 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 187 transition count 168
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 172 transition count 168
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 68 place count 168 transition count 164
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 168 transition count 164
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 168 transition count 163
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 167 transition count 163
Performed 38 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 38
Deduced a syphon composed of 38 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 38 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 76 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 129 transition count 125
Applied a total of 150 rules in 49 ms. Remains 129 /204 variables (removed 75) and now considering 125/200 (removed 75) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 125 rows 129 cols
[2024-05-25 15:39:30] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 206 ms returned [1, 6, 9, 10, 12, 13, 17, 39, 42, 43, 49, 54, 55, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 109, 113]
[2024-05-25 15:39:31] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [55, 54, 9, 42, 87, 88, 90, 113, 12, 13, 17, 43]
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 208 ms to find 12 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 117/204 places, 125/200 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 117 transition count 122
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 114 transition count 121
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 113 transition count 121
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 113 transition count 113
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 105 transition count 113
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 103 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 103 transition count 111
Performed 12 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 91 transition count 99
Applied a total of 52 rules in 34 ms. Remains 91 /117 variables (removed 26) and now considering 99/125 (removed 26) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 99 rows 91 cols
[2024-05-25 15:39:31] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 109 ms returned [1, 6, 8, 31, 36, 55, 63, 74]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 112 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 83/204 places, 99/200 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 80 transition count 96
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 79 transition count 95
Applied a total of 8 rules in 15 ms. Remains 79 /83 variables (removed 4) and now considering 95/99 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 95 rows 79 cols
[2024-05-25 15:39:31] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 91 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 15:39:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 15:39:31] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 67 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-25 15:39:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 213 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 307 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 79/204 places, 95/200 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 726 ms. Remains : 79/204 places, 95/200 transitions.
[2024-05-25 15:39:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 95 transitions.
[2024-05-25 15:39:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5525337434383730732.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2972539269680284899.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5525337434383730732.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2972539269680284899.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1052,0.055782,4340,2,733,5,3093,6,0,414,2260,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(!(E(!(((((crane_above_deposit_belt==0)||(arm1_having_swivel_1==1))||(TL_rot_run==0)) * EG((CU_ready_to_ungrasp==0)))) U AF(EG(((crane_...185
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(!(((((crane_above_deposit_belt==0)||(arm1_having_swivel_1==1))||(TL_rot_run==0)) * EG((CU_ready...236
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t46, t47, t48, t50, t53, t55, t58, t59, t73, t76, t79, t81, t85, t86, t90, t91, t93, t94, In...251
(forward)formula 0,1,0.954978,24756,1,0,753,129475,202,333,2386,100299,983
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLCardinality-2024-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 204/204 places, 200/200 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 200 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 200 transition count 196
Applied a total of 8 rules in 7 ms. Remains 200 /204 variables (removed 4) and now considering 196/200 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 200 cols
[2024-05-25 15:39:32] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 222 ms returned [14, 16, 17, 22, 61, 66, 67, 86, 88, 141, 142, 144, 146, 169, 171, 174]
Discarding 16 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 224 ms to find 16 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 184/204 places, 196/200 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 182 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 182 transition count 194
Applied a total of 4 rules in 6 ms. Remains 182 /184 variables (removed 2) and now considering 194/196 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 182 cols
[2024-05-25 15:39:32] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 131 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 15:39:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 15:39:33] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-25 15:39:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 584 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 717 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 182/204 places, 194/200 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 956 ms. Remains : 182/204 places, 194/200 transitions.
[2024-05-25 15:39:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 194 transitions.
[2024-05-25 15:39:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7644612555386565248.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10892845643360846900.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7644612555386565248.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10892845643360846900.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25632,0.124883,7012,2,2888,5,15249,6,0,925,9370,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EF((crane_release_height!=1)) U AG(EX((AG((arm1_waiting_for_swivel_2==1)) + ((A1U_ext_rs==0)&&((ch_FT_free==0)||(A1L_loaded==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,E(TRUE U (crane_release_height!=1))) * !(E(TRUE U !(EX((!(E(TRUE U !((arm1_waiting_for_swivel_2==1))...229
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t14, t22, t26, t30, t34, t42, t46, t54, t58, t65, t79, t84, t88, t98, t106, t110, t1...332
(forward)formula 0,0,1.96363,63256,1,0,293,214187,379,187,5022,138582,421
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLCardinality-2024-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 204/204 places, 200/200 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 200 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 200 transition count 196
Applied a total of 8 rules in 15 ms. Remains 200 /204 variables (removed 4) and now considering 196/200 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 200 cols
[2024-05-25 15:39:35] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 306 ms returned [14, 16, 17, 22, 61, 66, 67, 86, 88, 141, 142, 144, 146, 169, 171]
Discarding 15 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 308 ms to find 15 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 185/204 places, 196/200 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 183 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 183 transition count 194
Applied a total of 4 rules in 11 ms. Remains 183 /185 variables (removed 2) and now considering 194/196 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 183 cols
[2024-05-25 15:39:36] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 166 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 15:39:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 15:39:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-25 15:39:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 476 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 649 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 183/204 places, 194/200 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 984 ms. Remains : 183/204 places, 194/200 transitions.
[2024-05-25 15:39:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 194 transitions.
[2024-05-25 15:39:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16206480224247031033.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13926998614093259983.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16206480224247031033.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13926998614093259983.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25632,0.138582,7556,2,3270,5,17176,6,0,929,10488,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EG(EF(((!((crane_stop_v==0)||(CL_lower_run==1)))&&((feed_belt_occupied==0)||(A1U_ret_rs==1))))) U AX((FB_at_end==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(EX(!((FB_at_end==1)))))))) * !(E(!(!(EX(!((FB_at_end==1))))) U (!(EG(E(TRUE U ((!((crane_stop...274
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t14, t22, t26, t30, t34, t42, t46, t54, t58, t65, t79, t84, t88, t98, t106, t110, t1...332
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,3.74432,101580,1,0,492,500111,388,316,5447,280123,621
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLCardinality-2024-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 204/204 places, 200/200 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 200 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 200 transition count 196
Applied a total of 8 rules in 5 ms. Remains 200 /204 variables (removed 4) and now considering 196/200 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 200 cols
[2024-05-25 15:39:40] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 215 ms returned [14, 16, 17, 22, 61, 66, 67, 86, 141, 142, 144, 146, 169, 171, 174]
Discarding 15 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 217 ms to find 15 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 185/204 places, 196/200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 185 /185 variables (removed 0) and now considering 196/196 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 226 ms. Remains : 185/204 places, 196/200 transitions.
[2024-05-25 15:39:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 196 transitions.
[2024-05-25 15:39:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10253412834355321441.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3534547095527672765.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10253412834355321441.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3534547095527672765.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25632,0.131483,6788,2,2610,5,14030,6,0,939,8708,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((EG(AG((press_at_middle_pos==1))) * ((EF(EX((crane_above_feed_belt==0))) + (A2L_rotated==1)) + ((robot_left==0)&&(arm2_waiting_for_swi...168
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((EG(!(E(TRUE U !((press_at_middle_pos==1))))) * ((E(TRUE U EX((crane_above_feed_belt==0))) + (A2L_r...231
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t14, t22, t26, t30, t34, t42, t46, t54, t58, t65, t80, t85, t89, t99, t107, t111, t1...332
(forward)formula 0,0,2.27012,71692,1,0,343,285453,392,226,5568,184996,519
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLCardinality-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 204/204 places, 200/200 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 200 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 200 transition count 196
Applied a total of 8 rules in 4 ms. Remains 200 /204 variables (removed 4) and now considering 196/200 (removed 4) transitions.
[2024-05-25 15:39:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 15:39:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 171 ms returned [14, 16, 17, 22, 61, 66, 67, 88, 141, 142, 144, 146, 169, 171, 174]
Discarding 15 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 174 ms to find 15 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 185/204 places, 196/200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 185 /185 variables (removed 0) and now considering 196/196 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 180 ms. Remains : 185/204 places, 196/200 transitions.
[2024-05-25 15:39:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 196 transitions.
[2024-05-25 15:39:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8638364717323814285.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14422019167664852362.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8638364717323814285.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14422019167664852362.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25632,0.130288,7040,2,2888,5,15146,6,0,939,9198,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(A(EF(EG(EX(TRUE))) U AF(AG(((arm1_waiting_for_swivel_2==0)||(robot_right==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(!(!(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((arm1_waiting_for_swivel_2==0)||(robot_right==1))))))))) U (!(E(TRUE U EG...350
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t14, t22, t26, t30, t34, t42, t46, t54, t58, t65, t80, t85, t89, t99, t107, t111, t1...332
(forward)formula 0,0,3.16065,84144,1,0,369,391302,387,227,5239,237830,527
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLCardinality-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 204/204 places, 200/200 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 200 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 200 transition count 196
Applied a total of 8 rules in 3 ms. Remains 200 /204 variables (removed 4) and now considering 196/200 (removed 4) transitions.
[2024-05-25 15:39:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 15:39:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 233 ms returned [14, 16, 17, 22, 61, 66, 67, 86, 88, 141, 142, 144, 146, 169, 171, 174]
Discarding 16 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 234 ms to find 16 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 184/204 places, 196/200 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 182 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 182 transition count 194
Applied a total of 4 rules in 3 ms. Remains 182 /184 variables (removed 2) and now considering 194/196 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 182 cols
[2024-05-25 15:39:46] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 144 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 15:39:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 15:39:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-25 15:39:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 548 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 711 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 182/204 places, 194/200 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 955 ms. Remains : 182/204 places, 194/200 transitions.
[2024-05-25 15:39:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 194 transitions.
[2024-05-25 15:39:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10578430765721098733.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9426185562563225457.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10578430765721098733.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9426185562563225457.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25632,0.21361,7008,2,2888,5,15249,6,0,925,9370,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((CL_lower_rs!=1) U EF(((E(E(((A1L_rot3_run==0)||(DB_trans_run==1)) U ((CU_in==0)||(A1U_in==1))) U AF(((TU_out==0)||(A2L_in==1)))) * EX(...376
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((FwdU(FwdU(Init,(CL_lower_rs!=1)),TRUE) * (E(E(((A1L_rot3_run==0)||(DB_trans_run==1)) U ((CU_in==0)||(A1U_in...700
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t14, t22, t26, t30, t34, t42, t46, t54, t58, t65, t79, t84, t88, t98, t106, t110, t1...332
(forward)formula 0,0,1.82017,57508,1,0,259,168386,381,167,5026,112365,373
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLCardinality-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 204/204 places, 200/200 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 18 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 18 transitions
Performed 18 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 18
Iterating post reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 204 transition count 182
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 186 transition count 182
Performed 15 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 15 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 186 transition count 167
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 171 transition count 167
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 167 transition count 163
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 167 transition count 163
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 167 transition count 162
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 166 transition count 162
Performed 44 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 44
Deduced a syphon composed of 44 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 44 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 88 rules applied. Total rules applied 164 place count 122 transition count 118
Applied a total of 164 rules in 21 ms. Remains 122 /204 variables (removed 82) and now considering 118/200 (removed 82) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 118 rows 122 cols
[2024-05-25 15:39:49] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 226 ms returned [1, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 16, 36, 39, 40, 46, 52, 53, 73, 83, 84, 86, 87, 105, 106, 109]
[2024-05-25 15:39:49] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [53, 52, 8, 39, 83, 84, 86, 109, 11, 12, 16, 40]
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 228 ms to find 12 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 110/204 places, 118/200 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 110 transition count 115
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 107 transition count 115
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 107 transition count 108
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 100 transition count 108
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 98 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 98 transition count 106
Performed 12 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 86 transition count 94
Applied a total of 48 rules in 21 ms. Remains 86 /110 variables (removed 24) and now considering 94/118 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 94 rows 86 cols
[2024-05-25 15:39:49] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 179 ms returned [1, 5, 7, 28, 33, 54, 61, 71, 72]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 189 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 77/204 places, 94/200 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 73 transition count 90
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 72 transition count 89
Applied a total of 10 rules in 9 ms. Remains 72 /77 variables (removed 5) and now considering 89/94 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 72 cols
[2024-05-25 15:39:49] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 135 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 15:39:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 15:39:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 67 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-25 15:39:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 264 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 401 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 72/204 places, 89/200 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 869 ms. Remains : 72/204 places, 89/200 transitions.
[2024-05-25 15:39:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 89 transitions.
[2024-05-25 15:39:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10785992955955763057.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7555148730563969559.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10785992955955763057.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7555148730563969559.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,535,0.044527,3984,2,523,5,2144,6,0,380,1617,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF((A2U_rotated!=1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U (A2U_rotated!=1)))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t20, t44, t46, t48, t51, t53, t55, t68, t71, t73, t77, t78, t79, t84, t87, t88, Intersection...241
(forward)formula 0,1,0.244294,8524,1,0,112,16503,179,71,2342,11410,172
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLCardinality-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2024-05-25 15:39:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-25 15:39:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Total runtime 56059 ms.

BK_STOP 1716651590697

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ParamProductionCell-PT-1"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ParamProductionCell-PT-1, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r268-smll-171654406700017"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ParamProductionCell-PT-1.tgz
mv ParamProductionCell-PT-1 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;