fond
Model Checking Contest 2024
14th edition, Geneva, Switzerland, June 25, 2024
Execution of r267-smll-171654405700124
Last Updated
July 7, 2024

About the Execution of GreatSPN+red for PermAdmissibility-COL-05

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
736.035 34225.00 54360.00 538.40 TFFFFTFTTFFTFTTT normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r267-smll-171654405700124.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool greatspnxred
Input is PermAdmissibility-COL-05, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r267-smll-171654405700124
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 516K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.5K Apr 12 09:12 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 82K Apr 12 09:12 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K Apr 12 09:09 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 56K Apr 12 09:09 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Apr 23 07:42 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K Apr 23 07:42 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.4K Apr 23 07:42 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Apr 23 07:42 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Apr 12 09:24 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 107K Apr 12 09:24 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 10K Apr 12 09:22 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 81K Apr 12 09:22 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K Apr 23 07:42 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Apr 23 07:42 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 equiv_pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 54K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716664867432

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=greatspnxred
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=PermAdmissibility-COL-05
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Applying reductions before tool greatspn
Invoking reducer
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-25 19:21:09] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -timeout, 360, -rebuildPNML]
[2024-05-25 19:21:09] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-25 19:21:09] [INFO ] Detected file is not PT type :http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.axiom.locator.DefaultOMMetaFactoryLocator).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info.
[2024-05-25 19:21:10] [WARNING] Using fallBack plugin, rng conformance not checked
[2024-05-25 19:21:10] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (colored model parsed with PNMLFW) : 1102 ms
[2024-05-25 19:21:10] [INFO ] Imported 40 HL places and 16 HL transitions for a total of 208 PT places and 1024.0 transition bindings in 29 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 15 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
[2024-05-25 19:21:10] [INFO ] Built PT skeleton of HLPN with 40 places and 16 transitions 83 arcs in 15 ms.
[2024-05-25 19:21:10] [INFO ] Skeletonized 16 HLPN properties in 3 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 5 formulas.
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Computed a total of 40 stabilizing places and 16 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 40 transition count 16
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Remains 11 properties that can be checked using skeleton over-approximation.
Computed a total of 40 stabilizing places and 16 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 40 transition count 16
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 15 to 13
RANDOM walk for 292 steps (0 resets) in 37 ms. (7 steps per ms) remains 0/13 properties
[2024-05-25 19:21:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2024-05-25 19:21:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Symmetric sort wr.t. initial and guards and successors and join/free detected :input
Symmetric sort wr.t. initial detected :input
Symmetric sort wr.t. initial and guards detected :input
Applying symmetric unfolding of full symmetric sort :input domain size was 8
[2024-05-25 19:21:10] [INFO ] Unfolded HLPN to a Petri net with 40 places and 16 transitions 83 arcs in 21 ms.
[2024-05-25 19:21:10] [INFO ] Unfolded 11 HLPN properties in 0 ms.
Support contains 27 out of 40 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 40/40 places, 16/16 transitions.
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 32 transition count 16
Applied a total of 8 rules in 21 ms. Remains 32 /40 variables (removed 8) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 16 rows 32 cols
[2024-05-25 19:21:11] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 12 ms
[2024-05-25 19:21:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 244 ms returned [24, 28]
[2024-05-25 19:21:11] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [24]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 291 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 31/40 places, 16/16 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 31 /31 variables (removed 0) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 334 ms. Remains : 31/40 places, 16/16 transitions.
Support contains 27 out of 31 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-25 19:21:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-25 19:21:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-25 19:21:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 16 transitions.
Support contains 26 out of 31 places (down from 27) after GAL structural reductions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 14 to 12
RANDOM walk for 292 steps (0 resets) in 17 ms. (16 steps per ms) remains 0/12 properties
Computed a total of 31 stabilizing places and 16 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 31 transition count 16
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F((G(F(p1))||p0))))'
Support contains 9 out of 31 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 31/31 places, 16/16 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 30 transition count 16
Applied a total of 1 rules in 6 ms. Remains 30 /31 variables (removed 1) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 16 rows 30 cols
[2024-05-25 19:21:11] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-25 19:21:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 88 ms returned [4, 6, 12, 15, 16, 17, 19, 26]
[2024-05-25 19:21:11] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [4, 12, 15, 17, 26]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 90 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 25/31 places, 16/16 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 25 /25 variables (removed 0) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 97 ms. Remains : 25/31 places, 16/16 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 290 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-00
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 13322 reset in 384 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 13479 reset in 255 ms.
Computed a total of 25 stabilizing places and 16 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 25 transition count 16
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge sufficient to adopt a stutter insensitive property.
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 183 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 11 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 205 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), false, false]
RANDOM walk for 26266 steps (270 resets) in 229 ms. (114 steps per ms) remains 0/5 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p1), (F p0), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (F (NOT (OR p1 (NOT p0)))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 450 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 11 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 5 states, 11 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 187 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 192 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), false, false]
// Phase 1: matrix 16 rows 25 cols
[2024-05-25 19:21:14] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-25 19:21:14] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 9 generalized place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2024-05-25 19:21:14] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 15 ms returned sat
[2024-05-25 19:21:14] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 15/29/15 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 4 ms.
[2024-05-25 19:21:14] [INFO ] Added : 9 causal constraints over 2 iterations in 39 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))
Support contains 9 out of 25 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 25/25 places, 16/16 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 46 edges and 25 vertex of which 23 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 21 transition count 12
Applied a total of 2 rules in 14 ms. Remains 21 /25 variables (removed 4) and now considering 12/16 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 12 rows 21 cols
[2024-05-25 19:21:14] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-25 19:21:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned [5, 11, 13]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 59 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 18/25 places, 12/16 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 18 transition count 11
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 17 transition count 11
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 17 transition count 9
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 15 transition count 9
Applied a total of 6 rules in 8 ms. Remains 15 /18 variables (removed 3) and now considering 9/12 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 9 rows 15 cols
[2024-05-25 19:21:14] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 19:21:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 19:21:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:21:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 38 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 67 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 15/25 places, 9/16 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 150 ms. Remains : 15/25 places, 9/16 transitions.
Computed a total of 15 stabilizing places and 9 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 15 transition count 9
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT (AND p1 p0))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0)))), (F (G (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 11 factoid took 476 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 11 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 5 states, 11 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 192 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), false, false]
RANDOM walk for 23929 steps (433 resets) in 72 ms. (327 steps per ms) remains 0/5 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT (AND p1 p0))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0)))), (F (G (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F p1), (F p0), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p1))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 11 factoid took 606 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 11 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 5 states, 11 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 187 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 185 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), false, false]
[2024-05-25 19:21:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:21:16] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 6 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2024-05-25 19:21:16] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 9 ms returned sat
[2024-05-25 19:21:16] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 8/16/8 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 2 ms.
[2024-05-25 19:21:16] [INFO ] Added : 8 causal constraints over 2 iterations in 21 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 189 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), false, false]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 15746 reset in 187 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 15465 reset in 150 ms.
Support contains 9 out of 15 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 15/15 places, 9/9 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 15 /15 variables (removed 0) and now considering 9/9 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:21:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:21:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 19:21:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:21:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 32 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 64 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-25 19:21:17] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 8 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:21:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/15 variables, 2/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 9/24 variables, 15/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/24 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 24/24 variables, and 21 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved in 142 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 15/15 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/15 variables, 2/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 9/24 variables, 15/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 8/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/24 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 24/24 variables, and 29 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved in 127 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 15/15 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 294ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 301ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 374 ms. Remains : 15/15 places, 9/9 transitions.
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-00 finished in 5595 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G(p0)||(F(G(p1))&&(p2 U p3))))'
Support contains 12 out of 31 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 31/31 places, 16/16 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 77 edges and 31 vertex of which 28 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 3 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 3 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 2 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Applied a total of 1 rules in 2 ms. Remains 27 /31 variables (removed 4) and now considering 14/16 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 14 rows 27 cols
[2024-05-25 19:21:17] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 7 ms
[2024-05-25 19:21:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 65 ms returned [4, 6, 12, 15, 16]
[2024-05-25 19:21:17] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [4, 12, 15]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 66 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 24/31 places, 14/16 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 23 transition count 13
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 23 /24 variables (removed 1) and now considering 13/14 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 13 rows 23 cols
[2024-05-25 19:21:17] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-25 19:21:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned [5, 12]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 40 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 21/31 places, 13/16 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 21 transition count 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 20 transition count 12
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 20 /21 variables (removed 1) and now considering 12/13 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 12 rows 20 cols
[2024-05-25 19:21:17] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 19:21:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 19:21:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:21:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 41 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 80 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 3 : 20/31 places, 12/16 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 3 iterations and 193 ms. Remains : 20/31 places, 12/16 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 277 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), true, (NOT p0), (NOT p1), (NOT p3), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))]
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-02
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 18 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-02 finished in 489 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 3 out of 31 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 31/31 places, 16/16 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 77 edges and 31 vertex of which 4 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 27 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 27 places :
Also discarding 14 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 14 transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 1 ms. Remains 4 /31 variables (removed 27) and now considering 2/16 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 2 rows 4 cols
[2024-05-25 19:21:17] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-25 19:21:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 19 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 19:21:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:21:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 25 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 45 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-25 19:21:17] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 1 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:21:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/4 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/6 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/6 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 6/6 variables, and 6 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 27 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/4 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/6 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/6 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 6/6 variables, and 7 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 32 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 62ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 63ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 4/31 places, 2/16 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 114 ms. Remains : 4/31 places, 2/16 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 70 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-04
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 12 steps with 1 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-04 finished in 197 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((!p0&&F((G(F(p1))||(F(p1)&&p2))))))'
Support contains 6 out of 31 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 31/31 places, 16/16 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 77 edges and 31 vertex of which 12 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 19 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 19 places :
Also discarding 10 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 10 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Applied a total of 1 rules in 1 ms. Remains 11 /31 variables (removed 20) and now considering 6/16 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 6 rows 11 cols
[2024-05-25 19:21:18] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-25 19:21:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned [6]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 41 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 10/31 places, 6/16 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 10 transition count 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 9 transition count 5
Applied a total of 2 rules in 3 ms. Remains 9 /10 variables (removed 1) and now considering 5/6 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 5 rows 9 cols
[2024-05-25 19:21:18] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 19:21:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 24 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 19:21:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:21:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 29 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 56 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 9/31 places, 5/16 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 101 ms. Remains : 9/31 places, 5/16 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 120 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) p0), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-07
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 7571 reset in 183 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 7567 reset in 224 ms.
Computed a total of 9 stabilizing places and 5 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 9 transition count 5
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2)), (X (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p0), (X p1), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1)), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G p1)), (F (G (NOT p2)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))))]
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 12 factoid took 17 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-07 finished in 696 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G((X(F(p1))||p0))))'
Support contains 6 out of 31 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 31/31 places, 16/16 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 77 edges and 31 vertex of which 20 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 11 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 11 places :
Also discarding 6 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 6 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Applied a total of 1 rules in 3 ms. Remains 18 /31 variables (removed 13) and now considering 10/16 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 10 rows 18 cols
[2024-05-25 19:21:18] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-25 19:21:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned [8, 9, 12, 14]
[2024-05-25 19:21:18] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [8, 9, 12]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 53 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 15/31 places, 10/16 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 14 transition count 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 13 transition count 8
Applied a total of 2 rules in 3 ms. Remains 13 /15 variables (removed 2) and now considering 8/10 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 8 rows 13 cols
[2024-05-25 19:21:18] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-25 19:21:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned [9]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 34 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 12/31 places, 8/16 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 12 /12 variables (removed 0) and now considering 8/8 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 3 iterations and 95 ms. Remains : 12/31 places, 8/16 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 75 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-08
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3079 reset in 192 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3101 reset in 221 ms.
Computed a total of 12 stabilizing places and 8 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 12 transition count 8
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X p0), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X p1)), (F (G p0)), (F (G p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 11 factoid took 16 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-08 finished in 654 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(!p0)&&F(p1)&&F(G(p2)))))'
Support contains 9 out of 31 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 31/31 places, 16/16 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 77 edges and 31 vertex of which 28 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 3 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 3 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 2 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Applied a total of 1 rules in 2 ms. Remains 26 /31 variables (removed 5) and now considering 14/16 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 14 rows 26 cols
[2024-05-25 19:21:19] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 10 ms
[2024-05-25 19:21:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned [4, 6, 12, 13, 16, 18]
[2024-05-25 19:21:19] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [4, 12, 13, 16]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 75 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 22/31 places, 14/16 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 21 transition count 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 20 transition count 12
Applied a total of 2 rules in 9 ms. Remains 20 /22 variables (removed 2) and now considering 12/14 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 12 rows 20 cols
[2024-05-25 19:21:19] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-25 19:21:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned [5, 12]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 50 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 18/31 places, 12/16 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 18 transition count 11
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 17 transition count 11
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 17 /18 variables (removed 1) and now considering 11/12 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 11 rows 17 cols
[2024-05-25 19:21:19] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-25 19:21:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 19:21:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:21:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 35 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 69 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 3 : 17/31 places, 11/16 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 3 iterations and 208 ms. Remains : 17/31 places, 11/16 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 247 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p0), p0, (NOT p1), (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-09
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 55 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-09 finished in 471 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F((G(p1)&&p0))))'
Support contains 6 out of 31 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 31/31 places, 16/16 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 29 transition count 16
Applied a total of 2 rules in 1 ms. Remains 29 /31 variables (removed 2) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 16 rows 29 cols
[2024-05-25 19:21:19] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 19:21:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned [4, 5, 6, 7, 12, 13, 16, 18, 25]
[2024-05-25 19:21:19] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [4, 5, 12, 13, 16, 25]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 72 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 23/31 places, 16/16 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 23 /23 variables (removed 0) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 74 ms. Remains : 23/31 places, 16/16 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 120 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-10
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 80 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-10 finished in 211 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((X(p0)&&F((p0&&X(p0))))))'
Support contains 3 out of 31 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 31/31 places, 16/16 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 29 transition count 16
Applied a total of 2 rules in 3 ms. Remains 29 /31 variables (removed 2) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:21:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:21:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned [4, 5, 6, 7, 12, 13, 14, 15, 22, 24, 25]
[2024-05-25 19:21:20] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [4, 5, 12, 13, 14, 22, 25]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 70 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 22/31 places, 16/16 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 22 /22 variables (removed 0) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 76 ms. Remains : 22/31 places, 16/16 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 203 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), true, (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-11
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 211 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 225 ms.
Computed a total of 22 stabilizing places and 16 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 22 transition count 16
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0)), (F (G p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 19 ms. Reduced automaton from 6 states, 8 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-11 finished in 786 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F((X(F(p1))&&p0))))'
Support contains 6 out of 31 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 31/31 places, 16/16 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 30 transition count 16
Applied a total of 1 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /31 variables (removed 1) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 16 rows 30 cols
[2024-05-25 19:21:20] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 19:21:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 75 ms returned [4, 6, 12, 15, 16, 17, 19, 23, 25, 26]
[2024-05-25 19:21:20] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [4, 12, 15, 17, 23, 26]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 77 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 24/31 places, 16/16 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 24 /24 variables (removed 0) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 80 ms. Remains : 24/31 places, 16/16 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 111 ms :[(NOT p1), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-13
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25438 reset in 78 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25378 reset in 96 ms.
Computed a total of 24 stabilizing places and 16 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 24 transition count 16
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) p0), (X p0), (F (G (NOT p1))), (F (G p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X p1)), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 221 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 117 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
RANDOM walk for 28 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (5 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) p0), (X p0), (F (G (NOT p1))), (F (G p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X p1)), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F p1)]
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 239 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 109 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 107 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
// Phase 1: matrix 16 rows 24 cols
[2024-05-25 19:21:22] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 19:21:22] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 8 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2024-05-25 19:21:22] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 15 ms returned sat
[2024-05-25 19:21:22] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-05-25 19:21:22] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 0 positive and 8 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2024-05-25 19:21:22] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 13 ms returned sat
[2024-05-25 19:21:22] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 15/27/15 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 3 ms.
[2024-05-25 19:21:22] [INFO ] Added : 15 causal constraints over 3 iterations in 24 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p1)
Support contains 3 out of 24 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 24/24 places, 16/16 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 24 /24 variables (removed 0) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:21:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:21:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned [5, 13, 15, 20]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 37 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 20/24 places, 16/16 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 20 /20 variables (removed 0) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 38 ms. Remains : 20/24 places, 16/16 transitions.
Computed a total of 20 stabilizing places and 16 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 20 transition count 16
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p1), (F (G (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X p1))]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 124 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 106 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
RANDOM walk for 28 steps (0 resets) in 5 ms. (4 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p1), (F (G (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X p1)), (F p1)]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 143 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 104 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 109 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
// Phase 1: matrix 16 rows 20 cols
[2024-05-25 19:21:22] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-25 19:21:22] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2024-05-25 19:21:22] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 11 ms returned sat
[2024-05-25 19:21:22] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-05-25 19:21:22] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2024-05-25 19:21:23] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 13 ms returned sat
[2024-05-25 19:21:23] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 15/19/15 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 1 ms.
[2024-05-25 19:21:23] [INFO ] Added : 0 causal constraints over 0 iterations in 5 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p1)
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 109 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25400 reset in 53 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25393 reset in 59 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [true, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 109 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Support contains 3 out of 20 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 20/20 places, 16/16 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 25 edges and 20 vertex of which 6 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 14 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 14 places :
Also discarding 12 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 12 transitions
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 6 transition count 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 6 transition count 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 2 rules in 3 ms. Remains 6 /20 variables (removed 14) and now considering 4/16 (removed 12) transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:21:23] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 3 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 4 rows 6 cols
[2024-05-25 19:21:23] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/6 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Problem TDEAD1 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/10 variables, 6/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/10 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 10/10 variables, and 8 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved in 54 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 6/6 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/6 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/10 variables, 6/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 2/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/10 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 10/10 variables, and 10 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved in 46 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 6/6 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 105ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 1 dead transitions in 105ms
Found 1 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 1 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 6/20 places, 3/16 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 4 edges and 6 vertex of which 5 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 5 ms. Remains 5 /6 variables (removed 1) and now considering 3/3 (removed 0) transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 5/20 places, 3/16 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 119 ms. Remains : 5/20 places, 3/16 transitions.
Support contains 3 out of 20 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 20/20 places, 16/16 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 20 /20 variables (removed 0) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 16 rows 20 cols
[2024-05-25 19:21:23] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-25 19:21:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned [4, 5]
[2024-05-25 19:21:23] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [4]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 32 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 19/20 places, 16/16 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 19 /19 variables (removed 0) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 32 ms. Remains : 19/20 places, 16/16 transitions.
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-13 finished in 2980 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(!p0))'
Support contains 3 out of 31 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 31/31 places, 16/16 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 77 edges and 31 vertex of which 12 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 19 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 19 places :
Also discarding 10 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 10 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Applied a total of 1 rules in 3 ms. Remains 10 /31 variables (removed 21) and now considering 6/16 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 6 rows 10 cols
[2024-05-25 19:21:23] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-25 19:21:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned [4, 5]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 37 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 8/31 places, 6/16 transitions.
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 8 transition count 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 6 transition count 4
Applied a total of 4 rules in 3 ms. Remains 6 /8 variables (removed 2) and now considering 4/6 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 4 rows 6 cols
[2024-05-25 19:21:23] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-25 19:21:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 22 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 19:21:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:21:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 23 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 47 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 6/31 places, 4/16 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 90 ms. Remains : 6/31 places, 4/16 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 38 ms :[p0]
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-14
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 15752 reset in 64 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 15666 reset in 73 ms.
Computed a total of 6 stabilizing places and 4 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 6 transition count 4
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0)), (F (G p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 90 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 37 ms :[p0]
RANDOM walk for 52 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (10 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0)), (F (G p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 115 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 35 ms :[p0]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 40 ms :[p0]
[2024-05-25 19:21:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:21:24] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 2 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2024-05-25 19:21:24] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 4 ms returned sat
[2024-05-25 19:21:24] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 3/7/3 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 1 ms.
[2024-05-25 19:21:24] [INFO ] Added : 3 causal constraints over 1 iterations in 6 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG p0
Support contains 3 out of 6 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 6/6 places, 4/4 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 6 /6 variables (removed 0) and now considering 4/4 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:21:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:21:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 22 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 19:21:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:21:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 23 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 48 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-25 19:21:24] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 3 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:21:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/9 variables, 5/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/10 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/10 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 10/10 variables, and 8 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved in 65 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 6/6 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/9 variables, 5/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/10 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/10 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 10/10 variables, and 11 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved in 49 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 6/6 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 118ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 118ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 173 ms. Remains : 6/6 places, 4/4 transitions.
Computed a total of 6 stabilizing places and 4 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 6 transition count 4
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0)), (F (G p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 246 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 36 ms :[p0]
RANDOM walk for 52 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (10 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0)), (F (G p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 133 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 35 ms :[p0]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 51 ms :[p0]
[2024-05-25 19:21:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:21:25] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 2 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2024-05-25 19:21:25] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 3 ms returned sat
[2024-05-25 19:21:25] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 3/7/3 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 1 ms.
[2024-05-25 19:21:25] [INFO ] Added : 3 causal constraints over 1 iterations in 7 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG p0
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 36 ms :[p0]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 15765 reset in 60 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 15761 reset in 73 ms.
Support contains 3 out of 6 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 6/6 places, 4/4 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 6 /6 variables (removed 0) and now considering 4/4 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:21:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:21:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 24 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 19:21:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:21:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 24 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 50 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-25 19:21:25] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 3 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:21:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/9 variables, 5/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/10 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/10 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 10/10 variables, and 8 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved in 59 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 6/6 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/9 variables, 5/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/10 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/10 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 10/10 variables, and 11 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved in 67 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 6/6 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 131ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 132ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 189 ms. Remains : 6/6 places, 4/4 transitions.
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-14 finished in 1842 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((X(F(p1))&&p0)))'
Support contains 6 out of 31 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 31/31 places, 16/16 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 29 transition count 16
Applied a total of 2 rules in 1 ms. Remains 29 /31 variables (removed 2) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 16 rows 29 cols
[2024-05-25 19:21:25] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 19:21:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned [5, 7, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 25]
[2024-05-25 19:21:25] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [5, 12, 13, 14, 16, 25]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 61 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 23/31 places, 16/16 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 23 /23 variables (removed 0) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 64 ms. Remains : 23/31 places, 16/16 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 78 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-15
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2474 reset in 107 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2479 reset in 118 ms.
Computed a total of 23 stabilizing places and 16 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 23 transition count 16
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 115 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 76 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
RANDOM walk for 292 steps (0 resets) in 5 ms. (48 steps per ms) remains 0/2 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0), (F p1)]
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 179 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 77 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 75 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
// Phase 1: matrix 16 rows 23 cols
[2024-05-25 19:21:26] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 19:21:26] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 7 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2024-05-25 19:21:26] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 14 ms returned sat
[2024-05-25 19:21:26] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 15/29/15 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 2 ms.
[2024-05-25 19:21:26] [INFO ] Added : 7 causal constraints over 2 iterations in 17 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
[2024-05-25 19:21:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:21:26] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 7 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2024-05-25 19:21:26] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 14 ms returned sat
[2024-05-25 19:21:26] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 15/29/15 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 3 ms.
[2024-05-25 19:21:26] [INFO ] Added : 15 causal constraints over 3 iterations in 23 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p1)
Support contains 6 out of 23 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 23/23 places, 16/16 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 23 /23 variables (removed 0) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:21:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:21:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned [6, 11, 13]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 41 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 20/23 places, 16/16 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 20 /20 variables (removed 0) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 43 ms. Remains : 20/23 places, 16/16 transitions.
Computed a total of 20 stabilizing places and 16 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 20 transition count 16
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 126 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 73 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
RANDOM walk for 287 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (57 steps per ms) remains 0/2 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0), (F p1)]
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 181 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 75 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 76 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
// Phase 1: matrix 16 rows 20 cols
[2024-05-25 19:21:27] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-25 19:21:27] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2024-05-25 19:21:27] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 10 ms returned sat
[2024-05-25 19:21:27] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 15/23/15 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 3 ms.
[2024-05-25 19:21:27] [INFO ] Added : 7 causal constraints over 2 iterations in 19 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
[2024-05-25 19:21:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:21:27] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2024-05-25 19:21:27] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 15 ms returned sat
[2024-05-25 19:21:27] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 15/23/15 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 3 ms.
[2024-05-25 19:21:27] [INFO ] Added : 15 causal constraints over 3 iterations in 20 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p1)
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 73 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2494 reset in 91 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2488 reset in 107 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [false, true]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 74 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
Support contains 6 out of 20 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 20/20 places, 16/16 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 29 edges and 20 vertex of which 18 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 2 transitions
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 18 transition count 14
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 1 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 18 transition count 14
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 18 transition count 14
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 15 transition count 11
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 15 transition count 11
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 14 rules in 6 ms. Remains 15 /20 variables (removed 5) and now considering 11/16 (removed 5) transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:21:28] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 10 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 11 rows 15 cols
[2024-05-25 19:21:28] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 1 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
Problem TDEAD2 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD4 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 11/25 variables, 14/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/26 variables, 1/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/26 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 26/26 variables, and 19 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved in 126 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 15/15 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 3/13 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 11/24 variables, 13/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 6/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 2/26 variables, 2/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/26 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 26/26 variables, and 25 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved in 128 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 15/15 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 6/10 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 262ms problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 4 dead transitions in 263ms
Found 4 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 4 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 4 transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 15/20 places, 7/16 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 18 edges and 15 vertex of which 11 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 4 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 4 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 1 ms. Remains 11 /15 variables (removed 4) and now considering 7/7 (removed 0) transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 11/20 places, 7/16 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 277 ms. Remains : 11/20 places, 7/16 transitions.
Support contains 6 out of 20 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 20/20 places, 16/16 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 20 /20 variables (removed 0) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 16 rows 20 cols
[2024-05-25 19:21:28] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-25 19:21:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 19:21:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:21:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 34 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 63 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 15 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:21:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 16/35 variables, 19/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/36 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/36 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 36/36 variables, and 24 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved in 272 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 16/35 variables, 19/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 15/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/36 variables, 1/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/36 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 36/36 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved in 261 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 540ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 540ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 605 ms. Remains : 20/20 places, 16/16 transitions.
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-15 finished in 3275 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F((G(F(p1))||p0))))'
Found a Shortening insensitive property : PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-00
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 119 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Support contains 9 out of 31 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 31/31 places, 16/16 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 77 edges and 31 vertex of which 28 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 3 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 3 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 2 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Applied a total of 1 rules in 3 ms. Remains 27 /31 variables (removed 4) and now considering 14/16 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 14 rows 27 cols
[2024-05-25 19:21:29] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 19:21:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned [4, 6, 12, 15, 16, 17, 19]
[2024-05-25 19:21:29] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [4, 12, 15, 17]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 50 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 23/31 places, 14/16 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 21 transition count 12
Applied a total of 1 rules in 2 ms. Remains 21 /23 variables (removed 2) and now considering 12/14 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 12 rows 21 cols
[2024-05-25 19:21:29] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 19:21:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned [5, 11, 13]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 37 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 18/31 places, 12/16 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 18 transition count 11
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 17 transition count 11
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 17 transition count 9
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 15 transition count 9
Applied a total of 6 rules in 3 ms. Remains 15 /18 variables (removed 3) and now considering 9/12 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 9 rows 15 cols
[2024-05-25 19:21:29] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 19:21:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 19:21:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:21:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 34 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 63 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LI_LTL mode, iteration 3 : 15/31 places, 9/16 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LI_LTL mode , in 3 iterations and 159 ms. Remains : 15/31 places, 9/16 transitions.
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-00
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 9229 reset in 119 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 9371 reset in 131 ms.
Computed a total of 15 stabilizing places and 9 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 15 transition count 9
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
Knowledge sufficient to adopt a stutter insensitive property.
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 355 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 11 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 189 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), false, false]
RANDOM walk for 30347 steps (549 resets) in 35 ms. (842 steps per ms) remains 0/5 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F p1), (F p0), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p1))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 455 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 11 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 5 states, 11 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 190 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 189 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), false, false]
[2024-05-25 19:21:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:21:31] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 6 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2024-05-25 19:21:31] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 9 ms returned sat
[2024-05-25 19:21:31] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 8/16/8 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 1 ms.
[2024-05-25 19:21:31] [INFO ] Added : 8 causal constraints over 2 iterations in 13 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))
Support contains 9 out of 15 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 15/15 places, 9/9 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 15 /15 variables (removed 0) and now considering 9/9 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:21:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:21:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 25 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 19:21:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:21:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 33 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 61 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-25 19:21:31] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 8 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:21:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/15 variables, 2/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 9/24 variables, 15/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/24 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 24/24 variables, and 21 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved in 123 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 15/15 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/15 variables, 2/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 9/24 variables, 15/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 8/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/24 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 24/24 variables, and 29 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved in 119 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 15/15 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 249ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 250ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 321 ms. Remains : 15/15 places, 9/9 transitions.
Computed a total of 15 stabilizing places and 9 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 15 transition count 9
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT (AND p0 p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 11 factoid took 370 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 11 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 5 states, 11 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 187 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), false, false]
RANDOM walk for 27897 steps (505 resets) in 25 ms. (1072 steps per ms) remains 0/5 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT (AND p0 p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F p1), (F p0), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p1))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 11 factoid took 612 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 11 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 5 states, 11 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 188 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 190 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), false, false]
[2024-05-25 19:21:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:21:33] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 6 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2024-05-25 19:21:33] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 7 ms returned sat
[2024-05-25 19:21:33] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 8/16/8 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 0 ms.
[2024-05-25 19:21:33] [INFO ] Added : 8 causal constraints over 2 iterations in 10 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 188 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), false, false]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 15763 reset in 114 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 15535 reset in 124 ms.
Support contains 9 out of 15 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 15/15 places, 9/9 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 15 /15 variables (removed 0) and now considering 9/9 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:21:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:21:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 25 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 19:21:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:21:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 33 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 60 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-25 19:21:33] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 8 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:21:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/15 variables, 2/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 9/24 variables, 15/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/24 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 24/24 variables, and 21 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved in 130 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 15/15 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/15 variables, 2/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 9/24 variables, 15/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 8/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/24 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 24/24 variables, and 29 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved in 122 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 15/15 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 257ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 257ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 324 ms. Remains : 15/15 places, 9/9 transitions.
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-00 finished in 4953 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F((X(F(p1))&&p0))))'
Found a Shortening insensitive property : PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-13
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 147 ms :[(NOT p1), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Support contains 6 out of 31 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 31/31 places, 16/16 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 77 edges and 31 vertex of which 24 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 7 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 7 places :
Also discarding 4 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 4 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Applied a total of 1 rules in 2 ms. Remains 23 /31 variables (removed 8) and now considering 12/16 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 12 rows 23 cols
[2024-05-25 19:21:34] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-25 19:21:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned [4, 6, 12, 15, 16, 17, 19]
[2024-05-25 19:21:34] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [4, 12, 15, 17]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 71 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 19/31 places, 12/16 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 18 /19 variables (removed 1) and now considering 11/12 (removed 1) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 75 ms. Remains : 18/31 places, 11/16 transitions.
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-13
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 77 steps with 3 reset in 0 ms.
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-13 finished in 357 ms.
Length sensitive decision was in the wrong direction : Shortening insensitive + false
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(!p0))'
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((X(F(p1))&&p0)))'
Found a Shortening insensitive property : PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-15
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 76 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
Support contains 6 out of 31 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 31/31 places, 16/16 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 77 edges and 31 vertex of which 28 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 3 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 3 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 2 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Applied a total of 1 rules in 1 ms. Remains 26 /31 variables (removed 5) and now considering 14/16 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 14 rows 26 cols
[2024-05-25 19:21:34] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 19:21:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned [5, 7, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18]
[2024-05-25 19:21:34] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [5, 12, 13, 14, 16]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 56 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 21/31 places, 14/16 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 20 transition count 12
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 19 transition count 12
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 19 transition count 11
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 18 transition count 11
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 17 transition count 10
Applied a total of 5 rules in 3 ms. Remains 17 /21 variables (removed 4) and now considering 10/14 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 10 rows 17 cols
[2024-05-25 19:21:34] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-25 19:21:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned [6, 8, 9]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 34 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 14/31 places, 10/16 transitions.
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 14 transition count 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 11 transition count 7
Applied a total of 6 rules in 1 ms. Remains 11 /14 variables (removed 3) and now considering 7/10 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 7 rows 11 cols
[2024-05-25 19:21:34] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-25 19:21:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 21 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 19:21:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:21:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 26 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 48 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LI_LTL mode, iteration 3 : 11/31 places, 7/16 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LI_LTL mode , in 3 iterations and 143 ms. Remains : 11/31 places, 7/16 transitions.
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-15
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 6583 reset in 86 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 6532 reset in 106 ms.
Computed a total of 11 stabilizing places and 7 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 11 transition count 7
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 177 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 73 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
RANDOM walk for 124 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (24 steps per ms) remains 0/2 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0), (F p1)]
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 210 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 127 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 92 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
[2024-05-25 19:21:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:21:35] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2024-05-25 19:21:35] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 7 ms returned sat
[2024-05-25 19:21:35] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 6/14/6 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 2 ms.
[2024-05-25 19:21:35] [INFO ] Added : 1 causal constraints over 1 iterations in 7 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
[2024-05-25 19:21:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:21:35] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2024-05-25 19:21:35] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 6 ms returned sat
[2024-05-25 19:21:35] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 6/14/6 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 0 ms.
[2024-05-25 19:21:35] [INFO ] Added : 4 causal constraints over 1 iterations in 6 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p1)
Support contains 6 out of 11 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 11/11 places, 7/7 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 11 /11 variables (removed 0) and now considering 7/7 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:21:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:21:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 21 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 19:21:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:21:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 28 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 52 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 6 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:21:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/17 variables, 10/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/18 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/18 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 18/18 variables, and 15 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved in 84 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 11/11 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/17 variables, 10/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 6/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/18 variables, 1/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/18 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 18/18 variables, and 21 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved in 97 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 11/11 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 185ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 185ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 239 ms. Remains : 11/11 places, 7/7 transitions.
Computed a total of 11 stabilizing places and 7 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 11 transition count 7
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 119 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 73 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
RANDOM walk for 124 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (24 steps per ms) remains 0/2 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0), (F p1)]
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 179 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 74 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 77 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
[2024-05-25 19:21:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:21:36] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2024-05-25 19:21:36] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 5 ms returned sat
[2024-05-25 19:21:36] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 6/14/6 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 1 ms.
[2024-05-25 19:21:36] [INFO ] Added : 1 causal constraints over 1 iterations in 5 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
[2024-05-25 19:21:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:21:36] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2024-05-25 19:21:36] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 8 ms returned sat
[2024-05-25 19:21:36] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 6/14/6 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 1 ms.
[2024-05-25 19:21:36] [INFO ] Added : 4 causal constraints over 1 iterations in 8 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p1)
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 77 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 6501 reset in 90 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 6542 reset in 99 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [false, true]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 74 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
Support contains 6 out of 11 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 11/11 places, 7/7 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 11 /11 variables (removed 0) and now considering 7/7 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:21:37] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 6 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:21:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/17 variables, 10/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/18 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/18 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 18/18 variables, and 15 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved in 94 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 11/11 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/17 variables, 10/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 6/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/18 variables, 1/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/18 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 18/18 variables, and 21 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved in 108 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 11/11 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 213ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 213ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 220 ms. Remains : 11/11 places, 7/7 transitions.
Support contains 6 out of 11 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 11/11 places, 7/7 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 11 /11 variables (removed 0) and now considering 7/7 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:21:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:21:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 23 ms returned []
[2024-05-25 19:21:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-25 19:21:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 28 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 53 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 6 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-25 19:21:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/17 variables, 10/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/18 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/18 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 18/18 variables, and 15 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved in 96 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 11/11 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/17 variables, 10/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 6/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/18 variables, 1/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/18 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 18/18 variables, and 21 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved in 98 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 11/11 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 198ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 199ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 253 ms. Remains : 11/11 places, 7/7 transitions.
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-15 finished in 3230 ms.
[2024-05-25 19:21:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-25 19:21:37] [INFO ] Export to MCC of 4 properties in file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.sr.xml took 3 ms.
[2024-05-25 19:21:37] [INFO ] Export to PNML in file /home/mcc/execution/model.sr.pnml of net with 31 places, 16 transitions and 72 arcs took 2 ms.
Total runtime 28458 ms.
There are residual formulas that ITS could not solve within timeout
----------------------------------------------------------------------
GreatSPN-meddly tool, MCC 2023
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Running PermAdmissibility-COL-05

IS_COLORED=
IS_NUPN=

LOADING PETRI NET FILE /home/mcc/execution/415/model.pnml (PNML) ...
PNML VERSION 2009, P/T NET.
COLOR CLASSES: 0
CONSTANTS: 0
PLACES: 31
TRANSITIONS: 16
COLOR VARS: 0
MEASURES: 0
LOADING TIME: [User 0.001s, Sys 0.000s]


SAVING FILE /home/mcc/execution/415/model (.net / .def) ...
EXPORT TIME: [User 0.000s, Sys 0.000s]


----------------------------------------------------------------------
GreatSPN/Meddly.
Copyright (C) 1987-2022, University of Torino, Italy.
website: https://github.com/greatspn/SOURCES

Based on MEDDLY version 0.16.0
Copyright (C) 2009, Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc.
website: http://meddly.sourceforge.net

Process ID: 2050
MODEL NAME: /home/mcc/execution/415/model
31 places, 16 transitions.

Creating all event NSFs..
Creating all event NSFs..
Creating all event NSFs..
Split: SplitSubtract
Start RS construction.
Split: SplitSubtract
Start RS construction.
Split: SplitSubtract
Start RS construction.
Creating all event NSFs..
Split: SplitSubtract
Start RS construction.
Building monolithic NSF...
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS PARALLEL_PROCESSING UNFOLDING_TO_PT USE_NUPN TOPOLOGICAL
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS PARALLEL_PROCESSING UNFOLDING_TO_PT USE_NUPN TOPOLOGICAL
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS PARALLEL_PROCESSING UNFOLDING_TO_PT USE_NUPN TOPOLOGICAL
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS PARALLEL_PROCESSING UNFOLDING_TO_PT USE_NUPN TOPOLOGICAL
Ok.
EXITCODE: 0
----------------------------------------------------------------------

BK_STOP 1716664901657

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -timeout 360 -rebuildPNML

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="PermAdmissibility-COL-05"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="greatspnxred"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool greatspnxred"
echo " Input is PermAdmissibility-COL-05, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r267-smll-171654405700124"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/PermAdmissibility-COL-05.tgz
mv PermAdmissibility-COL-05 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;