About the Execution of ITS-Tools for JoinFreeModules-PT-0020
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
3997.867 | 1800000.00 | 1854506.00 | 3933.90 | [undef] | Time out reached |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r233-tall-171649622300024.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is JoinFreeModules-PT-0020, examination is Liveness
Time confinement is 1800 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r233-tall-171649622300024
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 532K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 72K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 65K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K Apr 22 14:50 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 23K Apr 22 14:50 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K Apr 22 14:50 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Apr 22 14:50 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K Apr 11 14:20 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 153K Apr 11 14:20 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.2K Apr 11 14:20 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 49K Apr 11 14:20 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K Apr 22 14:50 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 22 14:50 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 61K May 18 16:42 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
FORMULA_NAME Liveness
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1716534758113
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=Liveness
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=1800
BK_INPUT=JoinFreeModules-PT-0020
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
Liveness PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-24 07:12:39] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, Liveness, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 1800]
[2024-05-24 07:12:39] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-24 07:12:39] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 63 ms
[2024-05-24 07:12:39] [INFO ] Transformed 101 places.
[2024-05-24 07:12:39] [INFO ] Transformed 161 transitions.
[2024-05-24 07:12:39] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 101 places and 161 transitions and 462 arcs in 159 ms.
Discarding 80 transitions out of 161. Remains 81
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Built sparse matrix representations for Structural reductions in 4 ms.21036KB memory used
Starting structural reductions in DEADLOCK mode, iteration 0 : 100/100 places, 161/161 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Applied a total of 0 rules in 31 ms. Remains 100 /100 variables (removed 0) and now considering 161/161 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 120 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 161 rows 100 cols
[2024-05-24 07:12:39] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 6 ms
[2024-05-24 07:12:39] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 20/100 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 160/260 variables, 100/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 20/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 0/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/260 variables, 0/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 260/261 variables, and 140 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 3099 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 20/100 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 160/260 variables, 100/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 20/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 120/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
[2024-05-24 07:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 44 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 07:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 2/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 0/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
[2024-05-24 07:12:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/260 variables, 1/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 0/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/260 variables, 0/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 260/261 variables, and 263 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 7935 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 11106ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11121ms
Finished structural reductions in DEADLOCK mode , in 1 iterations and 11195 ms. Remains : 100/100 places, 161/161 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in DEADLOCK mode, iteration 0 : 100/100 places, 161/161 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 100 /100 variables (removed 0) and now considering 161/161 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-24 07:12:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 07:12:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 07:12:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 07:12:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 07:12:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 74 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 112 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-24 07:12:50] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 4 ms returned []
Running 120 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 07:12:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 07:12:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 20/100 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 160/260 variables, 100/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 20/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 0/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/260 variables, 0/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 260/261 variables, and 140 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 2626 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 20/100 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 160/260 variables, 100/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 20/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 120/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
[2024-05-24 07:12:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 07:12:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 07:12:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 07:12:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 4/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
[2024-05-24 07:12:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 07:12:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 2/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 0/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/260 variables, 0/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 260/261 variables, and 266 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 8432 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 11093ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11095ms
Finished structural reductions in DEADLOCK mode , in 1 iterations and 11224 ms. Remains : 100/100 places, 161/161 transitions.
Random walk for 1250000 steps, including 0 resets, run took 3204 ms (no deadlock found). (steps per millisecond=390 )
Random directed walk for 1250010 steps, including 0 resets, run took 3947 ms (no deadlock found). (steps per millisecond=316 )
[2024-05-24 07:13:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 07:13:09] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned unsat
Starting structural reductions in LIVENESS mode, iteration 0 : 101/101 places, 161/161 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 100 transition count 161
Applied a total of 1 rules in 6 ms. Remains 100 /101 variables (removed 1) and now considering 161/161 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 120 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 07:13:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 07:13:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 20/100 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 160/260 variables, 100/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 20/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 0/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/260 variables, 0/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 260/261 variables, and 140 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 2439 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 20/100 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 160/260 variables, 100/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 20/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 120/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
[2024-05-24 07:13:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 07:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 07:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 07:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 4/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
[2024-05-24 07:13:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 07:13:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 2/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 0/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/260 variables, 0/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 260/261 variables, and 266 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 8372 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 10827ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 10829ms
[2024-05-24 07:13:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 07:13:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 07:13:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 07:13:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 07:13:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 72 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 114 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 120 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 07:13:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 07:13:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 20/100 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 160/260 variables, 100/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 20/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 0/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/260 variables, 0/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 260/261 variables, and 140 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 2528 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 20/100 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 160/260 variables, 100/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 20/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 120/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
[2024-05-24 07:13:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 07:13:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 07:13:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 07:13:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 4/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
[2024-05-24 07:13:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 07:13:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 2/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 0/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/260 variables, 0/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 260/261 variables, and 266 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 8369 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 10917ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 10921ms
Starting structural reductions in LIVENESS mode, iteration 1 : 100/101 places, 161/161 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LIVENESS mode , in 1 iterations and 21870 ms. Remains : 100/101 places, 161/161 transitions.
Discarding 80 transitions out of 161. Remains 81
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
RANDOM walk for 10223 steps (0 resets) in 296 ms. (34 steps per ms) remains 0/80 properties
[2024-05-24 07:13:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 38 ms
[2024-05-24 07:13:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-24 07:13:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality4756645736498570450.gal : 22 ms
[2024-05-24 07:13:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15211770816842012095.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality4756645736498570450.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15211770816842012095.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:168)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:334)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:270)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:313)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:188)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:177)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:162)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:329)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:396)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:211)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:840)
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Able to resolve query QuasiLiveness after proving 81 properties.
Starting structural reductions in LIVENESS mode, iteration 0 : 101/101 places, 161/161 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 100 transition count 161
Applied a total of 1 rules in 2 ms. Remains 100 /101 variables (removed 1) and now considering 161/161 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 120 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 07:13:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 07:13:31] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 20/100 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 160/260 variables, 100/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 20/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 0/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/260 variables, 0/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 260/261 variables, and 140 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 2822 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 20/100 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 160/260 variables, 100/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 20/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 120/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
[2024-05-24 07:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 07:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 07:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 07:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 4/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
[2024-05-24 07:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 07:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 2/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 0/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/260 variables, 0/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 260/261 variables, and 266 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 8265 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 11122ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11124ms
[2024-05-24 07:13:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 07:13:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 07:13:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 07:13:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 07:13:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 66 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 98 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 120 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 07:13:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 07:13:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 20/100 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 160/260 variables, 100/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 20/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 0/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/260 variables, 0/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 260/261 variables, and 140 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 2488 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 20/100 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 160/260 variables, 100/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 20/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 120/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
[2024-05-24 07:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 07:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 07:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 07:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 4/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
[2024-05-24 07:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 07:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 2/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 0/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/260 variables, 0/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 260/261 variables, and 266 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 8449 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 10950ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 10952ms
Starting structural reductions in LIVENESS mode, iteration 1 : 100/101 places, 161/161 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LIVENESS mode , in 1 iterations and 22177 ms. Remains : 100/101 places, 161/161 transitions.
Discarding 80 transitions out of 161. Remains 81
Net is quasi-live, checking if it is reversible to establish liveness.
Net is conservative; using simplified expression for initial state.
[2024-05-24 07:13:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-24 07:13:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-24 07:13:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8571902404448272841.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 07:13:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13732293805064871221.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8571902404448272841.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13732293805064871221.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.11231e+84,1.10171,28680,2,3181,5,133612,6,0,864,136990,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-24 07:13:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-05-24 07:13:56] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-24 07:13:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3199128690887192222.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3199128690887192222.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3199128690887192222.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3199128690887192222.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3199128690887192222.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-24 07:13:56] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-24 07:13:56] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-24 07:13:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 39 ms
[2024-05-24 07:13:56] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-05-24 07:13:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13769775521362992946.gal : 20 ms
[2024-05-24 07:13:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2904287877329016698.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13769775521362992946.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2904287877329016698.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.11231e+84,0.057686,5116,22,159,104,7575,94,23,68,8318,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF((((((((u0.p1==2)&&(u0.p2==1))&&((u0.p3==20)&&(u1.p6==2)))&&(((u1.p7==1)&&(u1.p8==20))&&((u2.p11==2)&&(u2.p12==1))))&&((((u2.p13==20...966
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (((((((u0.p1==2)&&(u0.p2==1))&&((u0.p3==20)&&(u1.p6==2)))&&(((u1.p7==1)&&(u1.p8==...1026
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions u0.t1, u0.t2, u0.t3, u0.t4, u0.t8, u1.t9, u1.t10, u1.t11, u1.t12, u1.t16, u2.t17, u2.t18, u2....1043
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-24 07:13:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-24 07:13:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-24 07:13:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7903306809371785519.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 07:13:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4749175374781647339.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7903306809371785519.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4749175374781647339.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.11231e+84,0.961856,28764,2,3181,5,133612,6,0,864,136990,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF((((((((p1==2)&&(p2==1))&&((p3==20)&&(p6==2)))&&(((p7==1)&&(p8==20))&&((p11==2)&&(p12==1))))&&((((p13==20)&&(p16==2))&&((p17==1)&&(p...756
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (((((((p1==2)&&(p2==1))&&((p3==20)&&(p6==2)))&&(((p7==1)&&(p8==20))&&((p11==2)&&(...816
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t32,...693
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-24 07:14:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-24 07:14:29] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-24 07:14:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8508598485401972969.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8508598485401972969.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8508598485401972969.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8508598485401972969.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8508598485401972969.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-24 07:14:29] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-24 07:14:29] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-24 07:14:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-24 07:14:29] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-05-24 07:14:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1143066031421094599.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 07:14:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1998502360039654479.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1143066031421094599.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1998502360039654479.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.11231e+84,0.058945,5140,22,159,104,7575,91,23,67,8318,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF((((((((u0.p1==2)&&(u0.p2==1))&&((u0.p3==20)&&(u1.p6==2)))&&(((u1.p7==1)&&(u1.p8==20))&&((u2.p11==2)&&(u2.p12==1))))&&((((u2.p13==20...966
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (((((((u0.p1==2)&&(u0.p2==1))&&((u0.p3==20)&&(u1.p6==2)))&&(((u1.p7==1)&&(u1.p8==...1026
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions u0.t1, u0.t2, u0.t3, u0.t4, u0.t8, u1.t9, u1.t10, u1.t11, u1.t12, u1.t16, u2.t17, u2.t18, u2....1043
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-24 07:15:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-24 07:15:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-24 07:15:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2007168704445457388.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 07:15:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4125659556374310241.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2007168704445457388.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4125659556374310241.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.11231e+84,1.08301,28772,2,3181,5,133612,6,0,864,136990,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF((((((((p1==2)&&(p2==1))&&((p3==20)&&(p6==2)))&&(((p7==1)&&(p8==20))&&((p11==2)&&(p12==1))))&&((((p13==20)&&(p16==2))&&((p17==1)&&(p...756
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (((((((p1==2)&&(p2==1))&&((p3==20)&&(p6==2)))&&(((p7==1)&&(p8==20))&&((p11==2)&&(...816
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t32,...693
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-24 07:20:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-24 07:20:00] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-24 07:20:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1712188732822853574.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1712188732822853574.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1712188732822853574.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1712188732822853574.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1712188732822853574.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-24 07:20:00] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-24 07:20:00] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-24 07:20:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-24 07:20:00] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2024-05-24 07:20:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4545489160991803284.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 07:20:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16710245674073478706.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4545489160991803284.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16710245674073478706.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.11231e+84,0.057517,5140,22,159,104,7575,100,23,73,8318,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF((((((((u0.p1==2)&&(u0.p2==1))&&((u0.p3==20)&&(u1.p6==2)))&&(((u1.p7==1)&&(u1.p8==20))&&((u2.p11==2)&&(u2.p12==1))))&&((((u2.p13==20...966
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (((((((u0.p1==2)&&(u0.p2==1))&&((u0.p3==20)&&(u1.p6==2)))&&(((u1.p7==1)&&(u1.p8==...1026
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions u0.t1, u0.t2, u0.t3, u0.t4, u0.t8, u1.t9, u1.t10, u1.t11, u1.t12, u1.t16, u2.t17, u2.t18, u2....1043
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-24 07:25:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-05-24 07:25:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-05-24 07:25:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16576572107074522213.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 07:25:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2017887323645492602.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16576572107074522213.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2017887323645492602.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.11231e+84,0.997185,28768,2,3181,5,133612,6,0,864,136990,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF((((((((p1==2)&&(p2==1))&&((p3==20)&&(p6==2)))&&(((p7==1)&&(p8==20))&&((p11==2)&&(p12==1))))&&((((p13==20)&&(p16==2))&&((p17==1)&&(p...756
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (((((((p1==2)&&(p2==1))&&((p3==20)&&(p6==2)))&&(((p7==1)&&(p8==20))&&((p11==2)&&(...816
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t32,...693
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ Liveness = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution Liveness -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 1800
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination Liveness -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 1800
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="JoinFreeModules-PT-0020"
export BK_EXAMINATION="Liveness"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="1800"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is JoinFreeModules-PT-0020, examination is Liveness"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r233-tall-171649622300024"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/JoinFreeModules-PT-0020.tgz
mv JoinFreeModules-PT-0020 execution
cd execution
if [ "Liveness" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "Liveness" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "Liveness" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "Liveness" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "Liveness" = "Liveness" ] || [ "Liveness" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "Liveness" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "Liveness" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "Liveness" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "Liveness.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property Liveness.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "Liveness.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "Liveness" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "Liveness" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "Liveness" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "Liveness" = "Liveness" ] || [ "Liveness" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME Liveness"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;