Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r224-tall-171649612600362.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r224-tall-171649612600362
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 3.9M
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 105K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.9K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 49K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K Apr 22 14:51 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K Apr 22 14:51 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K Apr 22 14:51 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K Apr 22 14:51 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K Apr 12 13:42 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 124K Apr 12 13:42 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Apr 12 13:42 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 77K Apr 12 13:42 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K Apr 22 14:51 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.3K Apr 22 14:51 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.4M May 18 16:42 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-2023-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716581782267

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-24 20:16:23] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-24 20:16:23] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-24 20:16:23] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 284 ms
[2024-05-24 20:16:23] [INFO ] Transformed 5622 places.
[2024-05-24 20:16:23] [INFO ] Transformed 5449 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:16:23] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 5622 places and 5449 transitions and 17500 arcs in 427 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 16 ms.
Support contains 150 out of 5622 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 5622/5622 places, 5449/5449 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1093 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1093 rules applied. Total rules applied 1093 place count 4529 transition count 5449
Discarding 1035 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1035 rule applications. Total rules 2128 place count 3494 transition count 4414
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1035 rules applied. Total rules applied 3163 place count 3494 transition count 4414
Discarding 948 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 948 rule applications. Total rules 4111 place count 2546 transition count 3466
Iterating global reduction 1 with 948 rules applied. Total rules applied 5059 place count 2546 transition count 3466
Discarding 931 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 931 rule applications. Total rules 5990 place count 1615 transition count 2535
Iterating global reduction 1 with 931 rules applied. Total rules applied 6921 place count 1615 transition count 2535
Discarding 24 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 24 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 6945 place count 1591 transition count 2535
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 6967 place count 1569 transition count 2513
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 6989 place count 1569 transition count 2513
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 7010 place count 1548 transition count 2492
Iterating global reduction 2 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 7031 place count 1548 transition count 2492
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 7052 place count 1527 transition count 2471
Iterating global reduction 2 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 7073 place count 1527 transition count 2471
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 7094 place count 1506 transition count 2450
Iterating global reduction 2 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 7115 place count 1506 transition count 2450
Discarding 294 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 294 rule applications. Total rules 7409 place count 1212 transition count 2156
Iterating global reduction 2 with 294 rules applied. Total rules applied 7703 place count 1212 transition count 2156
Applied a total of 7703 rules in 2125 ms. Remains 1212 /5622 variables (removed 4410) and now considering 2156/5449 (removed 3293) transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:16:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1863 transitions (discarded 293 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 1863 rows 1212 cols
[2024-05-24 20:16:26] [INFO ] Computed 78 invariants in 60 ms
[2024-05-24 20:16:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 897 ms returned [49, 73, 77, 96, 192, 244, 398, 403, 423, 451, 504, 553, 631, 765, 769, 817, 898, 923, 1014, 1034, 1038, 1111, 1131, 1161]
Discarding 24 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 929 ms to find 24 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 1188/5622 places, 2156/5449 transitions.
Discarding 264 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 264 rule applications. Total rules 264 place count 924 transition count 1892
Iterating global reduction 0 with 264 rules applied. Total rules applied 528 place count 924 transition count 1892
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 537 place count 915 transition count 1883
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 546 place count 915 transition count 1883
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 555 place count 906 transition count 1874
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 564 place count 906 transition count 1874
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 573 place count 897 transition count 1865
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 582 place count 897 transition count 1865
Discarding 79 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 79 rule applications. Total rules 661 place count 818 transition count 1786
Iterating global reduction 0 with 79 rules applied. Total rules applied 740 place count 818 transition count 1786
Applied a total of 740 rules in 263 ms. Remains 818 /1188 variables (removed 370) and now considering 1786/2156 (removed 370) transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:16:27] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1350 transitions (discarded 436 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 1350 rows 818 cols
[2024-05-24 20:16:27] [INFO ] Computed 54 invariants in 23 ms
[2024-05-24 20:16:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 327 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 20:16:27] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1350 transitions (discarded 436 similar events)
[2024-05-24 20:16:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 20:16:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1690 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2019 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 818/5622 places, 1786/5449 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 5353 ms. Remains : 818/5622 places, 1786/5449 transitions.
Support contains 150 out of 818 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-24 20:16:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 129 ms
[2024-05-24 20:16:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 86 ms
[2024-05-24 20:16:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1786 transitions.
Support contains 145 out of 818 places (down from 150) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (2170 resets) in 2249 ms. (17 steps per ms) remains 6/80 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (240 resets) in 264 ms. (150 steps per ms) remains 5/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (242 resets) in 160 ms. (248 steps per ms) remains 4/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (224 resets) in 287 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (222 resets) in 141 ms. (281 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (220 resets) in 148 ms. (268 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (222 resets) in 155 ms. (256 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
[2024-05-24 20:16:31] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1350 transitions (discarded 436 similar events)
[2024-05-24 20:16:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 574/589 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/589 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 228/817 variables, 47/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/817 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp34 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1349/2166 variables, 817/871 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2166 variables, 0/871 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 2/2168 variables, 1/872 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2168 variables, 0/872 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/2168 variables, 0/872 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 2168/2168 variables, and 872 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved in 934 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 54/54 constraints, State Equation: 818/818 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 534/542 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/542 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 275/817 variables, 50/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/817 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1349/2166 variables, 817/871 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2166 variables, 3/874 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2166 variables, 0/874 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 2/2168 variables, 1/875 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2168 variables, 0/875 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/2168 variables, 0/875 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 2168/2168 variables, and 875 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved in 925 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 54/54 constraints, State Equation: 818/818 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/4 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1913ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
Finished Parikh walk after 9 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=9 )
Parikh walk visited 3 properties in 28 ms.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2024-05-24 20:16:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 138 ms
[2024-05-24 20:16:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 93 ms
[2024-05-24 20:16:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1786 transitions.
Computed a total of 818 stabilizing places and 1786 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 818 transition count 1786
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
AF dead knowledge conclusive for 1 formulas.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 818/818 places, 1786/1786 transitions.
Discarding 73 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 73 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 745 transition count 1713
Iterating global reduction 0 with 73 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 745 transition count 1713
Discarding 57 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 57 rule applications. Total rules 203 place count 688 transition count 1656
Iterating global reduction 0 with 57 rules applied. Total rules applied 260 place count 688 transition count 1656
Discarding 15 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 15 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 275 place count 673 transition count 1656
Discarding 49 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 49 rule applications. Total rules 324 place count 624 transition count 1607
Iterating global reduction 1 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 373 place count 624 transition count 1607
Discarding 18 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 18 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 391 place count 606 transition count 1607
Discarding 46 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 46 rule applications. Total rules 437 place count 560 transition count 1561
Iterating global reduction 2 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 483 place count 560 transition count 1561
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 516 place count 527 transition count 1528
Iterating global reduction 2 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 549 place count 527 transition count 1528
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 582 place count 494 transition count 1495
Iterating global reduction 2 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 615 place count 494 transition count 1495
Discarding 171 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 171 rule applications. Total rules 786 place count 323 transition count 1324
Iterating global reduction 2 with 171 rules applied. Total rules applied 957 place count 323 transition count 1324
Discarding 182 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 182 rule applications. Total rules 1139 place count 141 transition count 1142
Iterating global reduction 2 with 182 rules applied. Total rules applied 1321 place count 141 transition count 1142
Applied a total of 1321 rules in 379 ms. Remains 141 /818 variables (removed 677) and now considering 1142/1786 (removed 644) transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:16:33] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 140 transitions (discarded 1002 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 140 rows 141 cols
[2024-05-24 20:16:33] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 20:16:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 143 ms returned [36, 40, 44, 50, 54, 58, 66, 74, 78, 82, 86, 90, 96, 102, 110, 114, 118, 124, 128]
Discarding 19 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 146 ms to find 19 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 122/818 places, 1142/1786 transitions.
Discarding 38 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 38 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 84 transition count 1104
Iterating global reduction 0 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 84 transition count 1104
Applied a total of 76 rules in 18 ms. Remains 84 /122 variables (removed 38) and now considering 1104/1142 (removed 38) transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:16:33] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 1020 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 84 cols
[2024-05-24 20:16:33] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 20:16:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 91 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 20:16:34] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 1020 similar events)
[2024-05-24 20:16:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 20:16:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 162 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 260 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 84/818 places, 1104/1786 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 810 ms. Remains : 84/818 places, 1104/1786 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:16:34] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2024-05-24 20:16:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-2024-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-24 20:16:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2024-05-24 20:16:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1104 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 818/818 places, 1786/1786 transitions.
Discarding 68 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 68 rule applications. Total rules 68 place count 750 transition count 1718
Iterating global reduction 0 with 68 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 750 transition count 1718
Discarding 53 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 53 rule applications. Total rules 189 place count 697 transition count 1665
Iterating global reduction 0 with 53 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 697 transition count 1665
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 13 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 684 transition count 1665
Discarding 44 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 44 rule applications. Total rules 299 place count 640 transition count 1621
Iterating global reduction 1 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 343 place count 640 transition count 1621
Discarding 16 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 16 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 359 place count 624 transition count 1621
Discarding 42 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 42 rule applications. Total rules 401 place count 582 transition count 1579
Iterating global reduction 2 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 443 place count 582 transition count 1579
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 472 place count 553 transition count 1550
Iterating global reduction 2 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 501 place count 553 transition count 1550
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 530 place count 524 transition count 1521
Iterating global reduction 2 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 559 place count 524 transition count 1521
Discarding 147 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 147 rule applications. Total rules 706 place count 377 transition count 1374
Iterating global reduction 2 with 147 rules applied. Total rules applied 853 place count 377 transition count 1374
Discarding 162 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 162 rule applications. Total rules 1015 place count 215 transition count 1212
Iterating global reduction 2 with 162 rules applied. Total rules applied 1177 place count 215 transition count 1212
Applied a total of 1177 rules in 145 ms. Remains 215 /818 variables (removed 603) and now considering 1212/1786 (removed 574) transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:16:34] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 277 transitions (discarded 935 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 277 rows 215 cols
[2024-05-24 20:16:34] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-24 20:16:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 164 ms returned [38, 42, 46, 69, 73, 77, 110, 114, 134, 144, 158, 165, 171, 179, 183, 188, 198]
Discarding 17 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 170 ms to find 17 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 198/818 places, 1212/1786 transitions.
Discarding 64 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 64 rule applications. Total rules 64 place count 134 transition count 1148
Iterating global reduction 0 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 134 transition count 1148
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 129 place count 133 transition count 1147
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 133 transition count 1147
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 131 place count 132 transition count 1146
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 132 transition count 1146
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 133 place count 131 transition count 1145
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 131 transition count 1145
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 135 place count 130 transition count 1144
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 130 transition count 1144
Applied a total of 136 rules in 39 ms. Remains 130 /198 variables (removed 68) and now considering 1144/1212 (removed 68) transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:16:34] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 964 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 180 rows 130 cols
[2024-05-24 20:16:34] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-24 20:16:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 110 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 20:16:34] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 964 similar events)
[2024-05-24 20:16:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 20:16:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 195 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 309 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 130/818 places, 1144/1786 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 665 ms. Remains : 130/818 places, 1144/1786 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:16:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2024-05-24 20:16:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2024-05-24 20:16:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1144 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:16:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2024-05-24 20:16:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2024-05-24 20:16:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16008286320450277965.gal : 22 ms
[2024-05-24 20:16:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6396624877066250611.ctl : 61 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16008286320450277965.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6396624877066250611.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,131883,1.68938,60484,2,10005,5,141509,6,0,1630,140940,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AF(!(E((Node2ManageTheBreakDownOfNode17>=1) U ((Node18ManageTheBreakDownOfNode17>=1)||((Node18WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode29>=1)&&(N...668
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG(Init,!(!(E((Node2ManageTheBreakDownOfNode17>=1) U ((Node18ManageTheBreakDownOfNode17>=1)||((Node18WantsT...1171
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t23, t27, t28,...6080
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 1142/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,27.4046,757792,1,0,3468,3.3798e+06,2329,1275,11119,2.9236e+06,2517
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-2024-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 818/818 places, 1786/1786 transitions.
Discarding 69 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 69 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 749 transition count 1717
Iterating global reduction 0 with 69 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 749 transition count 1717
Discarding 55 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 55 rule applications. Total rules 193 place count 694 transition count 1662
Iterating global reduction 0 with 55 rules applied. Total rules applied 248 place count 694 transition count 1662
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 12 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 260 place count 682 transition count 1662
Discarding 46 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 46 rule applications. Total rules 306 place count 636 transition count 1616
Iterating global reduction 1 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 352 place count 636 transition count 1616
Discarding 18 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 18 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 370 place count 618 transition count 1616
Discarding 43 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 43 rule applications. Total rules 413 place count 575 transition count 1573
Iterating global reduction 2 with 43 rules applied. Total rules applied 456 place count 575 transition count 1573
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 486 place count 545 transition count 1543
Iterating global reduction 2 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 516 place count 545 transition count 1543
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 546 place count 515 transition count 1513
Iterating global reduction 2 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 576 place count 515 transition count 1513
Discarding 140 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 140 rule applications. Total rules 716 place count 375 transition count 1373
Iterating global reduction 2 with 140 rules applied. Total rules applied 856 place count 375 transition count 1373
Discarding 181 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 181 rule applications. Total rules 1037 place count 194 transition count 1192
Iterating global reduction 2 with 181 rules applied. Total rules applied 1218 place count 194 transition count 1192
Applied a total of 1218 rules in 90 ms. Remains 194 /818 variables (removed 624) and now considering 1192/1786 (removed 594) transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:17:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 241 transitions (discarded 951 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 241 rows 194 cols
[2024-05-24 20:17:03] [INFO ] Computed 24 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 20:17:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 162 ms returned [36, 40, 45, 53, 71, 90, 100, 108, 112, 116, 120, 140, 146, 152, 160, 164, 168, 178]
Discarding 18 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 164 ms to find 18 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 176/818 places, 1192/1786 transitions.
Discarding 57 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 57 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 119 transition count 1135
Iterating global reduction 0 with 57 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 119 transition count 1135
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 115 place count 118 transition count 1134
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 118 transition count 1134
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 117 place count 117 transition count 1133
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 117 transition count 1133
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 119 place count 116 transition count 1132
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 116 transition count 1132
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 121 place count 115 transition count 1131
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 115 transition count 1131
Applied a total of 122 rules in 14 ms. Remains 115 /176 variables (removed 61) and now considering 1131/1192 (removed 61) transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:17:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 149 transitions (discarded 982 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 149 rows 115 cols
[2024-05-24 20:17:03] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 20:17:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 110 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 20:17:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 149 transitions (discarded 982 similar events)
[2024-05-24 20:17:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 20:17:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 169 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 282 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 115/818 places, 1131/1786 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 550 ms. Remains : 115/818 places, 1131/1786 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:17:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2024-05-24 20:17:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2024-05-24 20:17:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1131 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:17:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2024-05-24 20:17:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2024-05-24 20:17:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10812116754535319282.gal : 10 ms
[2024-05-24 20:17:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1242324366477580010.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10812116754535319282.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1242324366477580010.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,96280,3.28186,108780,2,13890,5,239333,6,0,1557,260411,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EG((((EF(((Node11WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode29<1)||(NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode29<1))) * AF((Node6ManageTheBreakDownOfNode3>=1)...618
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),(((E(TRUE U ((Node11WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode29<1)||(NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode29<1))) ...679
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t6, t7, t8, t9, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23, t27,...6233
dead was empty
(forward)formula 0,0,29.0549,789592,1,0,3401,3.8125e+06,2294,1197,10585,2.73227e+06,2414
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-2024-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 818/818 places, 1786/1786 transitions.
Discarding 72 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 72 rule applications. Total rules 72 place count 746 transition count 1714
Iterating global reduction 0 with 72 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 746 transition count 1714
Discarding 56 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 56 rule applications. Total rules 200 place count 690 transition count 1658
Iterating global reduction 0 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 256 place count 690 transition count 1658
Discarding 15 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 15 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 271 place count 675 transition count 1658
Discarding 48 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 48 rule applications. Total rules 319 place count 627 transition count 1610
Iterating global reduction 1 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 367 place count 627 transition count 1610
Discarding 17 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 17 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 384 place count 610 transition count 1610
Discarding 45 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 45 rule applications. Total rules 429 place count 565 transition count 1565
Iterating global reduction 2 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 474 place count 565 transition count 1565
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 506 place count 533 transition count 1533
Iterating global reduction 2 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 538 place count 533 transition count 1533
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 570 place count 501 transition count 1501
Iterating global reduction 2 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 602 place count 501 transition count 1501
Discarding 170 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 170 rule applications. Total rules 772 place count 331 transition count 1331
Iterating global reduction 2 with 170 rules applied. Total rules applied 942 place count 331 transition count 1331
Discarding 172 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 172 rule applications. Total rules 1114 place count 159 transition count 1159
Iterating global reduction 2 with 172 rules applied. Total rules applied 1286 place count 159 transition count 1159
Applied a total of 1286 rules in 78 ms. Remains 159 /818 variables (removed 659) and now considering 1159/1786 (removed 627) transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:17:33] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 173 transitions (discarded 986 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 173 rows 159 cols
[2024-05-24 20:17:33] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-24 20:17:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 143 ms returned [36, 40, 44, 50, 54, 58, 66, 74, 78, 82, 86, 90, 96, 119, 127, 131, 135, 141, 145]
Discarding 19 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 144 ms to find 19 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 140/818 places, 1159/1786 transitions.
Discarding 47 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 47 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 93 transition count 1112
Iterating global reduction 0 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 93 transition count 1112
Applied a total of 94 rules in 5 ms. Remains 93 /140 variables (removed 47) and now considering 1112/1159 (removed 47) transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:17:33] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 108 transitions (discarded 1004 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 108 rows 93 cols
[2024-05-24 20:17:33] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 20:17:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 92 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 20:17:33] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 108 transitions (discarded 1004 similar events)
[2024-05-24 20:17:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 20:17:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 142 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 236 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 93/818 places, 1112/1786 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 463 ms. Remains : 93/818 places, 1112/1786 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:17:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2024-05-24 20:17:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2024-05-24 20:17:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1112 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:17:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2024-05-24 20:17:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2024-05-24 20:17:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18379932720567460545.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 20:17:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8644519275684631349.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18379932720567460545.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8644519275684631349.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,63931,1.99576,70088,2,8865,5,176208,6,0,1450,122307,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AF(EX(AX(A(((Node9IsActive>=1)&&(Node16DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1)) U ((Node22HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode9>=1)&&(LeafSetOfLxIsSent...173
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!(EX(!(EX(!(!((E(!(((Node22HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode9>=1)&&(LeafSetOfLxIsSentToNode22>...419
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t26, t27, t28...6519
dead was empty
(forward)formula 0,0,19.1344,570784,1,0,3413,2.74404e+06,2253,1180,9556,1.82357e+06,2369
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-2024-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 818/818 places, 1786/1786 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 3781 edges and 818 vertex of which 817 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.16 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 71 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 71 transitions
Performed 71 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 71
Iterating post reduction 0 with 71 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 817 transition count 1714
Reduce places removed 71 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 1 with 77 rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 746 transition count 1708
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 155 place count 740 transition count 1708
Performed 34 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 34 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 155 place count 740 transition count 1674
Deduced a syphon composed of 34 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 34 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 68 rules applied. Total rules applied 223 place count 706 transition count 1674
Discarding 39 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 39 rule applications. Total rules 262 place count 667 transition count 1635
Iterating global reduction 3 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 301 place count 667 transition count 1635
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 313 place count 655 transition count 1623
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 325 place count 655 transition count 1623
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 7 places
Iterating post reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 332 place count 648 transition count 1623
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 332 place count 648 transition count 1616
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 346 place count 641 transition count 1616
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 356 place count 631 transition count 1606
Iterating global reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 366 place count 631 transition count 1606
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 373 place count 624 transition count 1599
Iterating global reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 380 place count 624 transition count 1599
Discarding 52 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 52 rule applications. Total rules 432 place count 572 transition count 1547
Iterating global reduction 4 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 484 place count 572 transition count 1547
Performed 63 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 63
Deduced a syphon composed of 63 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 63 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 126 rules applied. Total rules applied 610 place count 509 transition count 1484
Discarding 53 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 53 rule applications. Total rules 663 place count 456 transition count 1431
Iterating global reduction 4 with 53 rules applied. Total rules applied 716 place count 456 transition count 1431
Applied a total of 716 rules in 279 ms. Remains 456 /818 variables (removed 362) and now considering 1431/1786 (removed 355) transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:17:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 844 transitions (discarded 587 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 844 rows 456 cols
[2024-05-24 20:17:53] [INFO ] Computed 47 invariants in 5 ms
[2024-05-24 20:17:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 341 ms returned [13, 40, 44, 55, 57, 69, 75, 86, 98, 102, 113, 115, 132, 146, 158, 162, 174, 186, 200, 211, 213, 224, 236, 241, 245, 247, 258, 270, 285, 303, 306, 335, 358, 369, 373, 375, 388, 394, 396, 409, 414]
Discarding 41 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 344 ms to find 41 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 415/818 places, 1431/1786 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 415 transition count 1430
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 414 transition count 1430
Discarding 255 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 255 rule applications. Total rules 257 place count 159 transition count 1175
Iterating global reduction 0 with 255 rules applied. Total rules applied 512 place count 159 transition count 1175
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 533 place count 138 transition count 1154
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 554 place count 138 transition count 1154
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 582 place count 110 transition count 1126
Iterating global reduction 0 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 610 place count 110 transition count 1126
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 9
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 628 place count 101 transition count 1117
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 630 place count 99 transition count 1115
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 632 place count 99 transition count 1115
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 634 place count 97 transition count 1113
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 636 place count 97 transition count 1113
Applied a total of 636 rules in 49 ms. Remains 97 /415 variables (removed 318) and now considering 1113/1431 (removed 318) transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:17:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 141 transitions (discarded 972 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 141 rows 97 cols
[2024-05-24 20:17:53] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 20:17:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 99 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 20:17:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 141 transitions (discarded 972 similar events)
[2024-05-24 20:17:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 20:17:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 157 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 259 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 97/818 places, 1113/1786 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 932 ms. Remains : 97/818 places, 1113/1786 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:17:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2024-05-24 20:17:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-05-24 20:17:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1113 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:17:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-05-24 20:17:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-05-24 20:17:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability699791624657076241.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 20:17:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3449811372770096694.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability699791624657076241.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3449811372770096694.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,34207,0.505901,21304,2,3328,5,65328,6,0,1468,23332,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(A(!(((Node8IsActive>=1)&&(Node14DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1))) U AF((AF(((Node1WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode8>=1)&&(NoNodeManageTheBreakDo...447
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(FwdU((FwdU(Init,!((E(!(!(EG(!((!(EG(!(((Node1WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode8>=1)&&(NoNodeManageTheBreakD...949
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t8, t13, t14, t19, t37, t52, t55, t65, t84, t87, t88, t89, t90, t91, t92, t93, t94, t95, t96,...6445
(forward)formula 0,1,11.0707,289188,1,0,3432,1.54499e+06,2265,1232,10010,964798,2441
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-2024-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 818/818 places, 1786/1786 transitions.
Discarding 66 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 66 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 752 transition count 1720
Iterating global reduction 0 with 66 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 752 transition count 1720
Discarding 52 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 52 rule applications. Total rules 184 place count 700 transition count 1668
Iterating global reduction 0 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 236 place count 700 transition count 1668
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 13 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 249 place count 687 transition count 1668
Discarding 42 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 42 rule applications. Total rules 291 place count 645 transition count 1626
Iterating global reduction 1 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 333 place count 645 transition count 1626
Discarding 15 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 15 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 348 place count 630 transition count 1626
Discarding 41 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 41 rule applications. Total rules 389 place count 589 transition count 1585
Iterating global reduction 2 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 430 place count 589 transition count 1585
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 458 place count 561 transition count 1557
Iterating global reduction 2 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 486 place count 561 transition count 1557
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 514 place count 533 transition count 1529
Iterating global reduction 2 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 542 place count 533 transition count 1529
Discarding 147 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 147 rule applications. Total rules 689 place count 386 transition count 1382
Iterating global reduction 2 with 147 rules applied. Total rules applied 836 place count 386 transition count 1382
Discarding 152 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 152 rule applications. Total rules 988 place count 234 transition count 1230
Iterating global reduction 2 with 152 rules applied. Total rules applied 1140 place count 234 transition count 1230
Applied a total of 1140 rules in 124 ms. Remains 234 /818 variables (removed 584) and now considering 1230/1786 (removed 556) transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:18:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 312 transitions (discarded 918 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 312 rows 234 cols
[2024-05-24 20:18:05] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-24 20:18:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 192 ms returned [37, 58, 62, 68, 88, 94, 111, 131, 135, 140, 144, 150, 173, 185, 212, 216]
Discarding 16 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 209 ms to find 16 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 218/818 places, 1230/1786 transitions.
Discarding 67 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 67 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 151 transition count 1163
Iterating global reduction 0 with 67 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 151 transition count 1163
Applied a total of 134 rules in 5 ms. Remains 151 /218 variables (removed 67) and now considering 1163/1230 (removed 67) transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:18:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 230 transitions (discarded 933 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 230 rows 151 cols
[2024-05-24 20:18:05] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-24 20:18:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 129 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 20:18:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 230 transitions (discarded 933 similar events)
[2024-05-24 20:18:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 20:18:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 352 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 486 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 151/818 places, 1163/1786 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 825 ms. Remains : 151/818 places, 1163/1786 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:18:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2024-05-24 20:18:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2024-05-24 20:18:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1163 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:18:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2024-05-24 20:18:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2024-05-24 20:18:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6018287743981947463.gal : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 20:18:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5439103979785635105.ctl : 95 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6018287743981947463.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5439103979785635105.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,223220,2.35011,79444,2,12548,5,198173,6,0,1733,151877,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX(((AF((AG(((Node27HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode31<1)||(LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode27<1))) + ((Node17DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1)&&(Node21...811
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((Init * EX(((!(EG(!((!(E(TRUE U !(((Node27HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode31<1)||(LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode2...1108
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23, t27,...6143
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-24 20:18:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2024-05-24 20:18:36] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-24 20:18:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4544114114874478904.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4544114114874478904.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4544114114874478904.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4544114114874478904.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4544114114874478904.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-24 20:18:36] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-24 20:18:36] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-24 20:18:36] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1251 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:18:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 376 ms
[2024-05-24 20:18:37] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 119 labels/synchronizations in 22 ms.
[2024-05-24 20:18:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1662676855710420672.gal : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 20:18:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability104288513306334573.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1662676855710420672.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability104288513306334573.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,223220,1.75508,69960,2269,2060,82337,47295,555,393297,565,69081,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX(((AF((AG(((i6.u26.Node27HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode31<1)||(i6.u29.LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode27<1))) + ((u2.Node17DontAnswerToAny...929
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((Init * EX(((!(EG(!((!(E(TRUE U !(((i6.u26.Node27HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode31<1)||(i6.u29.LeafSetOfR...1266
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t23, t38, t66, t74, t100, t107, t119, t126, t127, t140, t144, t147, t150, t151, t253, t27...4257
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,11.5491,404976,1,0,385032,214533,4548,2.54242e+06,3666,724638,1481326
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-2024-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 818/818 places, 1786/1786 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 3781 edges and 818 vertex of which 817 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.8 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 75 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 75 transitions
Performed 75 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 75
Iterating post reduction 0 with 75 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 817 transition count 1710
Reduce places removed 75 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 75 rules applied. Total rules applied 151 place count 742 transition count 1710
Performed 35 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 35 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 151 place count 742 transition count 1675
Deduced a syphon composed of 35 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 35 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 70 rules applied. Total rules applied 221 place count 707 transition count 1675
Discarding 41 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 41 rule applications. Total rules 262 place count 666 transition count 1634
Iterating global reduction 2 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 303 place count 666 transition count 1634
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 317 place count 652 transition count 1620
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 331 place count 652 transition count 1620
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 7 places
Iterating post reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 338 place count 645 transition count 1620
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 338 place count 645 transition count 1613
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 352 place count 638 transition count 1613
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 362 place count 628 transition count 1603
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 372 place count 628 transition count 1603
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 379 place count 621 transition count 1596
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 386 place count 621 transition count 1596
Discarding 51 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 51 rule applications. Total rules 437 place count 570 transition count 1545
Iterating global reduction 3 with 51 rules applied. Total rules applied 488 place count 570 transition count 1545
Performed 63 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 63
Deduced a syphon composed of 63 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 63 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 126 rules applied. Total rules applied 614 place count 507 transition count 1482
Discarding 51 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 51 rule applications. Total rules 665 place count 456 transition count 1431
Iterating global reduction 3 with 51 rules applied. Total rules applied 716 place count 456 transition count 1431
Applied a total of 716 rules in 151 ms. Remains 456 /818 variables (removed 362) and now considering 1431/1786 (removed 355) transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:18:49] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 844 transitions (discarded 587 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 844 rows 456 cols
[2024-05-24 20:18:49] [INFO ] Computed 47 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-24 20:18:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 358 ms returned [13, 41, 45, 56, 58, 70, 76, 87, 99, 103, 114, 116, 128, 133, 147, 159, 163, 189, 203, 214, 216, 227, 239, 244, 248, 250, 261, 275, 277, 288, 305, 308, 321, 336, 342, 356, 367, 371, 388, 394, 396, 409, 414]
Discarding 43 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 361 ms to find 43 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 413/818 places, 1431/1786 transitions.
Discarding 268 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 268 rule applications. Total rules 268 place count 145 transition count 1163
Iterating global reduction 0 with 268 rules applied. Total rules applied 536 place count 145 transition count 1163
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 558 place count 123 transition count 1141
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 580 place count 123 transition count 1141
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 602 place count 101 transition count 1119
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 624 place count 101 transition count 1119
Performed 10 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 644 place count 91 transition count 1109
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 646 place count 89 transition count 1107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 648 place count 89 transition count 1107
Applied a total of 648 rules in 28 ms. Remains 89 /413 variables (removed 324) and now considering 1107/1431 (removed 324) transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:18:49] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 987 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 120 rows 89 cols
[2024-05-24 20:18:49] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-24 20:18:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 91 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 20:18:49] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 987 similar events)
[2024-05-24 20:18:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 20:18:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 182 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 274 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 89/818 places, 1107/1786 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 814 ms. Remains : 89/818 places, 1107/1786 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:18:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2024-05-24 20:18:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2024-05-24 20:18:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1107 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:18:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2024-05-24 20:18:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2024-05-24 20:18:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6227885523488278149.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 20:18:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15599846513766865517.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6227885523488278149.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15599846513766865517.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,18001,1.42327,54788,2,11744,5,122681,6,0,1430,67727,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((AG((!(E((Node27HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode3>=1) U (Node13HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode15>=1))) + (Node2ManageTheBreakDownOfNode15...241
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!(E(TRUE U !((!(E((Node27HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode3>=1) U (Node13HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode...296
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t7, t10, t11, t14, t21, t25, t30, t37, t38, t40, t45, t46, t58, t59, t60, t61, t62, t63, ...6559
(forward)formula 0,0,14.1894,467624,1,0,3318,1.60296e+06,2246,1129,9623,1.28527e+06,2272
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-2024-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 818/818 places, 1786/1786 transitions.
Discarding 68 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 68 rule applications. Total rules 68 place count 750 transition count 1718
Iterating global reduction 0 with 68 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 750 transition count 1718
Discarding 52 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 52 rule applications. Total rules 188 place count 698 transition count 1666
Iterating global reduction 0 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 698 transition count 1666
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 12 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 686 transition count 1666
Discarding 44 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 44 rule applications. Total rules 296 place count 642 transition count 1622
Iterating global reduction 1 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 340 place count 642 transition count 1622
Discarding 17 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 17 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 357 place count 625 transition count 1622
Discarding 42 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 42 rule applications. Total rules 399 place count 583 transition count 1580
Iterating global reduction 2 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 441 place count 583 transition count 1580
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 470 place count 554 transition count 1551
Iterating global reduction 2 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 499 place count 554 transition count 1551
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 528 place count 525 transition count 1522
Iterating global reduction 2 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 557 place count 525 transition count 1522
Discarding 139 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 139 rule applications. Total rules 696 place count 386 transition count 1383
Iterating global reduction 2 with 139 rules applied. Total rules applied 835 place count 386 transition count 1383
Discarding 172 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 172 rule applications. Total rules 1007 place count 214 transition count 1211
Iterating global reduction 2 with 172 rules applied. Total rules applied 1179 place count 214 transition count 1211
Applied a total of 1179 rules in 80 ms. Remains 214 /818 variables (removed 604) and now considering 1211/1786 (removed 575) transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:19:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 274 transitions (discarded 937 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 274 rows 214 cols
[2024-05-24 20:19:04] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-24 20:19:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 157 ms returned [36, 40, 44, 50, 54, 58, 83, 91, 95, 99, 103, 107, 123, 129, 168, 177, 181, 185, 193, 197]
Discarding 20 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 158 ms to find 20 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 194/818 places, 1211/1786 transitions.
Discarding 74 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 74 rule applications. Total rules 74 place count 120 transition count 1137
Iterating global reduction 0 with 74 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 120 transition count 1137
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 149 place count 119 transition count 1136
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 119 transition count 1136
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 151 place count 118 transition count 1135
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 118 transition count 1135
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 153 place count 117 transition count 1134
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 117 transition count 1134
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 155 place count 116 transition count 1133
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 116 transition count 1133
Applied a total of 156 rules in 13 ms. Remains 116 /194 variables (removed 78) and now considering 1133/1211 (removed 78) transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:19:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 163 transitions (discarded 970 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 163 rows 116 cols
[2024-05-24 20:19:04] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 20:19:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 98 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 20:19:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 163 transitions (discarded 970 similar events)
[2024-05-24 20:19:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 20:19:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 172 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 271 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 116/818 places, 1133/1786 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 522 ms. Remains : 116/818 places, 1133/1786 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:19:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2024-05-24 20:19:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2024-05-24 20:19:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1133 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:19:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2024-05-24 20:19:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2024-05-24 20:19:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3085077606921970174.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 20:19:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18157150664182088059.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3085077606921970174.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18157150664182088059.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,127293,1.28467,47016,2,7701,5,128619,6,0,1563,85242,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX(A(A((Node18ManageTheBreakDownOfNode13>=1) U !(AG(((Node22HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode32>=1)&&(LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode22>=1))))...410
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(EY(FwdU((Init * !(EX(!((E(!((!(E(TRUE U !((Node28ManageTheBreakDownOfNode22>=1)))) + EG((Node9HasTheLeafSet...945
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t26, t27, t28...6548
(forward)formula 0,1,18.6783,598184,1,0,3452,2.57871e+06,2312,1197,10429,2.05447e+06,2413
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-2024-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 818/818 places, 1786/1786 transitions.
Discarding 71 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 71 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 747 transition count 1715
Iterating global reduction 0 with 71 rules applied. Total rules applied 142 place count 747 transition count 1715
Discarding 55 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 55 rule applications. Total rules 197 place count 692 transition count 1660
Iterating global reduction 0 with 55 rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 692 transition count 1660
Discarding 15 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 15 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 267 place count 677 transition count 1660
Discarding 49 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 49 rule applications. Total rules 316 place count 628 transition count 1611
Iterating global reduction 1 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 365 place count 628 transition count 1611
Discarding 18 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 18 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 383 place count 610 transition count 1611
Discarding 46 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 46 rule applications. Total rules 429 place count 564 transition count 1565
Iterating global reduction 2 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 475 place count 564 transition count 1565
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 508 place count 531 transition count 1532
Iterating global reduction 2 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 541 place count 531 transition count 1532
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 574 place count 498 transition count 1499
Iterating global reduction 2 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 607 place count 498 transition count 1499
Discarding 171 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 171 rule applications. Total rules 778 place count 327 transition count 1328
Iterating global reduction 2 with 171 rules applied. Total rules applied 949 place count 327 transition count 1328
Discarding 182 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 182 rule applications. Total rules 1131 place count 145 transition count 1146
Iterating global reduction 2 with 182 rules applied. Total rules applied 1313 place count 145 transition count 1146
Applied a total of 1313 rules in 92 ms. Remains 145 /818 variables (removed 673) and now considering 1146/1786 (removed 640) transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:19:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 146 transitions (discarded 1000 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 146 rows 145 cols
[2024-05-24 20:19:23] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-24 20:19:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 134 ms returned [36, 40, 46, 52, 56, 60, 68, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 98, 104, 112, 116, 120, 128, 132]
Discarding 19 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 136 ms to find 19 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 126/818 places, 1146/1786 transitions.
Discarding 38 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 38 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 88 transition count 1108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 88 transition count 1108
Applied a total of 76 rules in 5 ms. Remains 88 /126 variables (removed 38) and now considering 1108/1146 (removed 38) transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:19:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 1018 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 88 cols
[2024-05-24 20:19:23] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-24 20:19:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 103 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 20:19:24] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 1018 similar events)
[2024-05-24 20:19:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 20:19:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 140 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 248 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 88/818 places, 1108/1786 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 483 ms. Remains : 88/818 places, 1108/1786 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:19:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2024-05-24 20:19:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2024-05-24 20:19:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1108 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:19:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2024-05-24 20:19:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2024-05-24 20:19:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10113623926359602052.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 20:19:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8164959674427112009.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10113623926359602052.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8164959674427112009.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,42442,1.25773,40784,2,6570,5,98752,6,0,1426,60542,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AX(AF(((Node4ManageTheBreakDownOfNode30>=1)&&(Node29ManageTheBreakDownOfNode6>=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EX(!(!(EG(!(((Node4ManageTheBreakDownOfNode30>=1)&&(Node29ManageTheBreakDownOfNode6>=1)))))))))] ...163
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t26, t27, t28...6511
(forward)formula 0,0,14.7647,444668,1,0,3381,2.11968e+06,2238,1163,9414,1.47742e+06,2343
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-2024-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 818/818 places, 1786/1786 transitions.
Discarding 63 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 63 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 755 transition count 1723
Iterating global reduction 0 with 63 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 755 transition count 1723
Discarding 51 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 51 rule applications. Total rules 177 place count 704 transition count 1672
Iterating global reduction 0 with 51 rules applied. Total rules applied 228 place count 704 transition count 1672
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 13 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 691 transition count 1672
Discarding 42 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 42 rule applications. Total rules 283 place count 649 transition count 1630
Iterating global reduction 1 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 325 place count 649 transition count 1630
Discarding 14 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 14 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 339 place count 635 transition count 1630
Discarding 40 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 40 rule applications. Total rules 379 place count 595 transition count 1590
Iterating global reduction 2 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 419 place count 595 transition count 1590
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 446 place count 568 transition count 1563
Iterating global reduction 2 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 473 place count 568 transition count 1563
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 500 place count 541 transition count 1536
Iterating global reduction 2 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 527 place count 541 transition count 1536
Discarding 147 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 147 rule applications. Total rules 674 place count 394 transition count 1389
Iterating global reduction 2 with 147 rules applied. Total rules applied 821 place count 394 transition count 1389
Discarding 139 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 139 rule applications. Total rules 960 place count 255 transition count 1250
Iterating global reduction 2 with 139 rules applied. Total rules applied 1099 place count 255 transition count 1250
Applied a total of 1099 rules in 96 ms. Remains 255 /818 variables (removed 563) and now considering 1250/1786 (removed 536) transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:19:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 349 transitions (discarded 901 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 349 rows 255 cols
[2024-05-24 20:19:39] [INFO ] Computed 27 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-24 20:19:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 172 ms returned [53, 63, 86, 94, 103, 137, 141, 169, 175, 183, 188, 192, 198, 219]
Discarding 14 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 173 ms to find 14 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 241/818 places, 1250/1786 transitions.
Discarding 65 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 65 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 176 transition count 1185
Iterating global reduction 0 with 65 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 176 transition count 1185
Applied a total of 130 rules in 5 ms. Remains 176 /241 variables (removed 65) and now considering 1185/1250 (removed 65) transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:19:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 271 transitions (discarded 914 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 271 rows 176 cols
[2024-05-24 20:19:39] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 20:19:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 124 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 20:19:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 271 transitions (discarded 914 similar events)
[2024-05-24 20:19:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 20:19:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 244 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 370 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 176/818 places, 1185/1786 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 644 ms. Remains : 176/818 places, 1185/1786 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:19:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2024-05-24 20:19:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2024-05-24 20:19:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1185 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:19:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2024-05-24 20:19:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2024-05-24 20:19:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14680934321726306843.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 20:19:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2982374655679651130.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14680934321726306843.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2982374655679651130.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,277529,3.23468,107604,2,14175,5,275488,6,0,1855,252298,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF((AG(((NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode18<1)||(Node32WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode18<1))) * ((((A(((Node20IsActive>=1)&&(Node27DontAns...1044
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!((!(E(TRUE U !(((NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode18<1)||(Node32WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode18<1)))...1463
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t6, t8, t9, t10, t11, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t21, t23, t24, t25, t26, t28...5865
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-24 20:20:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2024-05-24 20:20:10] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-24 20:20:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10417753475123087507.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10417753475123087507.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10417753475123087507.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10417753475123087507.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10417753475123087507.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-24 20:20:10] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-24 20:20:10] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-24 20:20:10] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1317 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:20:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 55 ms
[2024-05-24 20:20:10] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 111 labels/synchronizations in 10 ms.
[2024-05-24 20:20:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3369384473807643674.gal : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 20:20:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9136746840365900304.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3369384473807643674.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9136746840365900304.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,277529,2.80379,99624,2813,4597,117474,39779,745,485639,611,217311,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF((AG(((i3.u4.NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode18<1)||(i3.u4.Node32WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode18<1))) * ((((A(((u3.Node20IsActive>=1)&...1202
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!((!(E(TRUE U !(((i3.u4.NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode18<1)||(i3.u4.Node32WantsToManageTheBreakDownO...1659
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t6, t10, t11, t21, t24, t32, t33, t37, t48, t66, t68, t77, t84, t86, t88, t92, t93, t103,...4298
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
dead was empty
(forward)formula 0,1,17.1728,566564,1,0,427484,389830,5470,2.60291e+06,3831,3.18375e+06,1550978
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-2024-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 818/818 places, 1786/1786 transitions.
Discarding 69 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 69 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 749 transition count 1717
Iterating global reduction 0 with 69 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 749 transition count 1717
Discarding 54 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 54 rule applications. Total rules 192 place count 695 transition count 1663
Iterating global reduction 0 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 246 place count 695 transition count 1663
Discarding 14 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 14 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 260 place count 681 transition count 1663
Discarding 46 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 46 rule applications. Total rules 306 place count 635 transition count 1617
Iterating global reduction 1 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 352 place count 635 transition count 1617
Discarding 15 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 15 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 367 place count 620 transition count 1617
Discarding 41 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 41 rule applications. Total rules 408 place count 579 transition count 1576
Iterating global reduction 2 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 449 place count 579 transition count 1576
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 478 place count 550 transition count 1547
Iterating global reduction 2 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 507 place count 550 transition count 1547
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 536 place count 521 transition count 1518
Iterating global reduction 2 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 565 place count 521 transition count 1518
Discarding 158 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 158 rule applications. Total rules 723 place count 363 transition count 1360
Iterating global reduction 2 with 158 rules applied. Total rules applied 881 place count 363 transition count 1360
Discarding 152 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 152 rule applications. Total rules 1033 place count 211 transition count 1208
Iterating global reduction 2 with 152 rules applied. Total rules applied 1185 place count 211 transition count 1208
Applied a total of 1185 rules in 75 ms. Remains 211 /818 variables (removed 607) and now considering 1208/1786 (removed 578) transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:20:27] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 270 transitions (discarded 938 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 270 rows 211 cols
[2024-05-24 20:20:27] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-24 20:20:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 153 ms returned [36, 40, 44, 50, 54, 58, 66, 107, 111, 115, 119, 123, 147, 153, 161, 165, 169, 184, 190, 194]
Discarding 20 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 154 ms to find 20 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 191/818 places, 1208/1786 transitions.
Discarding 72 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 72 rule applications. Total rules 72 place count 119 transition count 1136
Iterating global reduction 0 with 72 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 119 transition count 1136
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 145 place count 118 transition count 1135
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 118 transition count 1135
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 147 place count 117 transition count 1134
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 117 transition count 1134
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 149 place count 116 transition count 1133
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 116 transition count 1133
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 151 place count 115 transition count 1132
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 115 transition count 1132
Applied a total of 152 rules in 13 ms. Remains 115 /191 variables (removed 76) and now considering 1132/1208 (removed 76) transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:20:27] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 161 transitions (discarded 971 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 161 rows 115 cols
[2024-05-24 20:20:27] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 20:20:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 102 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 20:20:28] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 161 transitions (discarded 971 similar events)
[2024-05-24 20:20:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 20:20:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 168 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 272 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 115/818 places, 1132/1786 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 514 ms. Remains : 115/818 places, 1132/1786 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:20:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2024-05-24 20:20:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2024-05-24 20:20:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1132 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:20:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2024-05-24 20:20:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2024-05-24 20:20:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15849107107519293901.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 20:20:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5196705982639501426.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15849107107519293901.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5196705982639501426.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,128088,2.71366,90112,2,11102,5,270086,6,0,1558,196175,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EG((((Node3IsActive<1)||(Node22DontAnswerToAnyNode<1)) * ((EX((Node27ManageTheBreakDownOfNode15<1)) + (Node14HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxTo...304
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),(((Node3IsActive<1)||(Node22DontAnswerToAnyNode<1)) * ((EX((Node27ManageTheBreakDownOfNod...391
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t26, t27, t28...6547
(forward)formula 0,1,17.3556,505476,1,0,3350,1.82785e+06,2288,1142,10367,1.74903e+06,2298
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-2024-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 818/818 places, 1786/1786 transitions.
Discarding 68 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 68 rule applications. Total rules 68 place count 750 transition count 1718
Iterating global reduction 0 with 68 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 750 transition count 1718
Discarding 53 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 53 rule applications. Total rules 189 place count 697 transition count 1665
Iterating global reduction 0 with 53 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 697 transition count 1665
Discarding 15 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 15 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 682 transition count 1665
Discarding 46 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 46 rule applications. Total rules 303 place count 636 transition count 1619
Iterating global reduction 1 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 349 place count 636 transition count 1619
Discarding 15 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 15 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 364 place count 621 transition count 1619
Discarding 42 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 42 rule applications. Total rules 406 place count 579 transition count 1577
Iterating global reduction 2 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 448 place count 579 transition count 1577
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 478 place count 549 transition count 1547
Iterating global reduction 2 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 508 place count 549 transition count 1547
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 538 place count 519 transition count 1517
Iterating global reduction 2 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 568 place count 519 transition count 1517
Discarding 168 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 168 rule applications. Total rules 736 place count 351 transition count 1349
Iterating global reduction 2 with 168 rules applied. Total rules applied 904 place count 351 transition count 1349
Discarding 152 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 152 rule applications. Total rules 1056 place count 199 transition count 1197
Iterating global reduction 2 with 152 rules applied. Total rules applied 1208 place count 199 transition count 1197
Applied a total of 1208 rules in 96 ms. Remains 199 /818 variables (removed 619) and now considering 1197/1786 (removed 589) transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:20:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 245 transitions (discarded 952 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 245 rows 199 cols
[2024-05-24 20:20:45] [INFO ] Computed 24 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 20:20:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 157 ms returned [57, 61, 84, 88, 92, 102, 128, 132, 136, 140, 144, 150, 156, 165, 169, 173, 179, 183]
Discarding 18 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 158 ms to find 18 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 181/818 places, 1197/1786 transitions.
Discarding 62 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 62 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 119 transition count 1135
Iterating global reduction 0 with 62 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 119 transition count 1135
Applied a total of 124 rules in 5 ms. Remains 119 /181 variables (removed 62) and now considering 1135/1197 (removed 62) transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:20:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 166 transitions (discarded 969 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 166 rows 119 cols
[2024-05-24 20:20:46] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-24 20:20:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 94 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 20:20:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 166 transitions (discarded 969 similar events)
[2024-05-24 20:20:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 20:20:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 172 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 275 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 119/818 places, 1135/1786 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 534 ms. Remains : 119/818 places, 1135/1786 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:20:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2024-05-24 20:20:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2024-05-24 20:20:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1135 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:20:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2024-05-24 20:20:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2024-05-24 20:20:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17031149466286070624.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 20:20:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7063261471189733393.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17031149466286070624.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7063261471189733393.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,123986,2.85215,88492,2,12820,5,230007,6,0,1577,204955,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(E((EX(EG((Node10ManageTheBreakDownOfNode17>=1))) + !(((EG((Node6HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode20>=1)) * ((Node12HasTheLeafSetOfRxToRep...468
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E((EX(EG((Node10ManageTheBreakDownOfNode17>=1))) + !(((EG((Node6HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode20>=1))...718
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t25, t27...6386
dead was empty
(forward)formula 0,0,19.6541,589236,1,0,3337,2.0676e+06,2311,1153,10581,1.76837e+06,2329
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-2024-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 818/818 places, 1786/1786 transitions.
Discarding 63 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 63 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 755 transition count 1723
Iterating global reduction 0 with 63 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 755 transition count 1723
Discarding 47 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 47 rule applications. Total rules 173 place count 708 transition count 1676
Iterating global reduction 0 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 220 place count 708 transition count 1676
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 12 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 232 place count 696 transition count 1676
Discarding 40 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 40 rule applications. Total rules 272 place count 656 transition count 1636
Iterating global reduction 1 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 312 place count 656 transition count 1636
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 13 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 325 place count 643 transition count 1636
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 362 place count 606 transition count 1599
Iterating global reduction 2 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 399 place count 606 transition count 1599
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 424 place count 581 transition count 1574
Iterating global reduction 2 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 449 place count 581 transition count 1574
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 474 place count 556 transition count 1549
Iterating global reduction 2 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 499 place count 556 transition count 1549
Discarding 136 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 136 rule applications. Total rules 635 place count 420 transition count 1413
Iterating global reduction 2 with 136 rules applied. Total rules applied 771 place count 420 transition count 1413
Discarding 132 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 132 rule applications. Total rules 903 place count 288 transition count 1281
Iterating global reduction 2 with 132 rules applied. Total rules applied 1035 place count 288 transition count 1281
Applied a total of 1035 rules in 110 ms. Remains 288 /818 variables (removed 530) and now considering 1281/1786 (removed 505) transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:21:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 408 transitions (discarded 873 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 408 rows 288 cols
[2024-05-24 20:21:06] [INFO ] Computed 29 invariants in 5 ms
[2024-05-24 20:21:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 186 ms returned [36, 56, 77, 85, 106, 110, 135, 160, 181, 185, 189, 193, 199, 231, 235, 239, 245, 249]
Discarding 18 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 188 ms to find 18 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 270/818 places, 1281/1786 transitions.
Discarding 100 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 100 rule applications. Total rules 100 place count 170 transition count 1181
Iterating global reduction 0 with 100 rules applied. Total rules applied 200 place count 170 transition count 1181
Applied a total of 200 rules in 6 ms. Remains 170 /270 variables (removed 100) and now considering 1181/1281 (removed 100) transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:21:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 291 transitions (discarded 890 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 291 rows 170 cols
[2024-05-24 20:21:06] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 20:21:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 109 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 20:21:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 291 transitions (discarded 890 similar events)
[2024-05-24 20:21:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 20:21:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 257 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 367 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 170/818 places, 1181/1786 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 671 ms. Remains : 170/818 places, 1181/1786 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:21:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2024-05-24 20:21:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2024-05-24 20:21:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1181 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:21:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2024-05-24 20:21:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2024-05-24 20:21:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17165541629572508029.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 20:21:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4090766869576614230.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17165541629572508029.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4090766869576614230.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,395513,3.17668,107028,2,14700,5,256812,6,0,1827,252530,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((EX(EG((((Node31ManageTheBreakDownOfNode29>=1)&&(Node25HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode22>=1))&&(LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode25>=1)))) ...773
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((!(!((E(!(((Node25HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode18>=1)&&(LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode25...1026
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t26, t27...6468
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-24 20:21:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2024-05-24 20:21:37] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-24 20:21:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17851881719144956448.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17851881719144956448.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17851881719144956448.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17851881719144956448.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17851881719144956448.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-24 20:21:37] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-24 20:21:37] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-24 20:21:37] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1297 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:21:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 49 ms
[2024-05-24 20:21:37] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 106 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2024-05-24 20:21:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8230015458827846243.gal : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 20:21:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10451800686321676080.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8230015458827846243.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10451800686321676080.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,395513,2.12826,79700,2803,3303,78095,51020,621,306963,609,391349,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((EX(EG((((i7.i1.u29.Node31ManageTheBreakDownOfNode29>=1)&&(i0.i0.u27.Node25HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode22>=1))&&(i0.i0.u2.Leaf...921
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((!(!((E(!(((i0.i0.u26.Node25HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode18>=1)&&(i0.i0.u2.LeafSe...1212
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t22, t91, t109, t115, t116, t125, t128, t130, t143, t144, t146, t148, t151, t154, t164, t165,...4657
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,19.0866,683336,1,0,444881,323184,4912,3.64282e+06,3757,4.54663e+06,1565767
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 818/818 places, 1786/1786 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 3781 edges and 818 vertex of which 817 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 79 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 79 transitions
Performed 79 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 79
Iterating post reduction 0 with 79 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 817 transition count 1706
Reduce places removed 79 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 79 rules applied. Total rules applied 159 place count 738 transition count 1706
Performed 35 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 35 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 159 place count 738 transition count 1671
Deduced a syphon composed of 35 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 35 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 70 rules applied. Total rules applied 229 place count 703 transition count 1671
Discarding 42 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 42 rule applications. Total rules 271 place count 661 transition count 1629
Iterating global reduction 2 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 313 place count 661 transition count 1629
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 327 place count 647 transition count 1615
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 341 place count 647 transition count 1615
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 7 places
Iterating post reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 348 place count 640 transition count 1615
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 348 place count 640 transition count 1608
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 362 place count 633 transition count 1608
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 372 place count 623 transition count 1598
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 382 place count 623 transition count 1598
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 389 place count 616 transition count 1591
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 396 place count 616 transition count 1591
Discarding 52 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 52 rule applications. Total rules 448 place count 564 transition count 1539
Iterating global reduction 3 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 500 place count 564 transition count 1539
Performed 63 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 63
Deduced a syphon composed of 63 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 63 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 126 rules applied. Total rules applied 626 place count 501 transition count 1476
Discarding 53 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 53 rule applications. Total rules 679 place count 448 transition count 1423
Iterating global reduction 3 with 53 rules applied. Total rules applied 732 place count 448 transition count 1423
Applied a total of 732 rules in 126 ms. Remains 448 /818 variables (removed 370) and now considering 1423/1786 (removed 363) transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:21:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 835 transitions (discarded 588 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 835 rows 448 cols
[2024-05-24 20:21:56] [INFO ] Computed 47 invariants in 13 ms
[2024-05-24 20:21:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 326 ms returned [13, 39, 43, 54, 56, 68, 74, 85, 97, 101, 112, 114, 126, 131, 145, 157, 161, 173, 185, 199, 210, 212, 223, 235, 240, 244, 246, 257, 269, 271, 282, 299, 302, 330, 336, 350, 361, 365, 367, 380, 386, 388, 401, 406]
Discarding 44 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 328 ms to find 44 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 404/818 places, 1423/1786 transitions.
Discarding 270 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 270 rule applications. Total rules 270 place count 134 transition count 1153
Iterating global reduction 0 with 270 rules applied. Total rules applied 540 place count 134 transition count 1153
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 563 place count 111 transition count 1130
Iterating global reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 586 place count 111 transition count 1130
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 609 place count 88 transition count 1107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 632 place count 88 transition count 1107
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 648 place count 80 transition count 1099
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 650 place count 78 transition count 1097
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 652 place count 78 transition count 1097
Applied a total of 652 rules in 37 ms. Remains 78 /404 variables (removed 326) and now considering 1097/1423 (removed 326) transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:21:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 91 transitions (discarded 1006 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 91 rows 78 cols
[2024-05-24 20:21:57] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 20:21:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 93 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 20:21:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 91 transitions (discarded 1006 similar events)
[2024-05-24 20:21:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 20:21:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 133 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 227 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 78/818 places, 1097/1786 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 719 ms. Remains : 78/818 places, 1097/1786 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:21:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-24 20:21:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-24 20:21:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1097 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 675 steps (72 resets) in 7 ms. (84 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2024-05-24 20:21:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2024-05-24 20:21:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-24 20:21:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7132443955209317189.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 20:21:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality13457842591633850938.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7132443955209317189.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality13457842591633850938.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 818/818 places, 1786/1786 transitions.
Discarding 73 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 73 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 745 transition count 1713
Iterating global reduction 0 with 73 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 745 transition count 1713
Discarding 57 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 57 rule applications. Total rules 203 place count 688 transition count 1656
Iterating global reduction 0 with 57 rules applied. Total rules applied 260 place count 688 transition count 1656
Discarding 15 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 15 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 275 place count 673 transition count 1656
Discarding 49 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 49 rule applications. Total rules 324 place count 624 transition count 1607
Iterating global reduction 1 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 373 place count 624 transition count 1607
Discarding 18 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 18 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 391 place count 606 transition count 1607
Discarding 46 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 46 rule applications. Total rules 437 place count 560 transition count 1561
Iterating global reduction 2 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 483 place count 560 transition count 1561
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 516 place count 527 transition count 1528
Iterating global reduction 2 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 549 place count 527 transition count 1528
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 582 place count 494 transition count 1495
Iterating global reduction 2 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 615 place count 494 transition count 1495
Discarding 170 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 170 rule applications. Total rules 785 place count 324 transition count 1325
Iterating global reduction 2 with 170 rules applied. Total rules applied 955 place count 324 transition count 1325
Discarding 182 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 182 rule applications. Total rules 1137 place count 142 transition count 1143
Iterating global reduction 2 with 182 rules applied. Total rules applied 1319 place count 142 transition count 1143
Applied a total of 1319 rules in 92 ms. Remains 142 /818 variables (removed 676) and now considering 1143/1786 (removed 643) transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:21:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 142 transitions (discarded 1001 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 142 rows 142 cols
[2024-05-24 20:21:57] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-24 20:21:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 129 ms returned [36, 40, 44, 50, 54, 58, 66, 75, 79, 83, 87, 91, 97, 103, 111, 115, 125, 129]
Discarding 18 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 130 ms to find 18 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 124/818 places, 1143/1786 transitions.
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 88 transition count 1107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 88 transition count 1107
Applied a total of 72 rules in 4 ms. Remains 88 /124 variables (removed 36) and now considering 1107/1143 (removed 36) transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:21:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 1018 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 88 cols
[2024-05-24 20:21:57] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 20:21:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 95 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 20:21:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 1018 similar events)
[2024-05-24 20:21:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 20:21:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 134 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 233 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 88/818 places, 1107/1786 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 461 ms. Remains : 88/818 places, 1107/1786 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:21:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-05-24 20:21:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2024-05-24 20:21:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1107 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:21:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2024-05-24 20:21:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2024-05-24 20:21:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10168128821871959921.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 20:21:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5413960581981076448.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10168128821871959921.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5413960581981076448.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,41931,1.2467,45540,2,6191,5,131570,6,0,1425,71863,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AG(((Node14WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode27<1)||(NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode27<1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !(((Node14WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode27<1)||(NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode27<1)))))...166
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t26, t27...6340
(forward)formula 0,1,6.82496,211624,1,0,3251,925536,2236,1112,9513,771008,2225
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 818/818 places, 1786/1786 transitions.
Discarding 69 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 69 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 749 transition count 1717
Iterating global reduction 0 with 69 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 749 transition count 1717
Discarding 54 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 54 rule applications. Total rules 192 place count 695 transition count 1663
Iterating global reduction 0 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 246 place count 695 transition count 1663
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 13 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 259 place count 682 transition count 1663
Discarding 46 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 46 rule applications. Total rules 305 place count 636 transition count 1617
Iterating global reduction 1 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 351 place count 636 transition count 1617
Discarding 18 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 18 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 369 place count 618 transition count 1617
Discarding 44 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 44 rule applications. Total rules 413 place count 574 transition count 1573
Iterating global reduction 2 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 457 place count 574 transition count 1573
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 488 place count 543 transition count 1542
Iterating global reduction 2 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 519 place count 543 transition count 1542
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 549 place count 513 transition count 1512
Iterating global reduction 2 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 579 place count 513 transition count 1512
Discarding 148 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 148 rule applications. Total rules 727 place count 365 transition count 1364
Iterating global reduction 2 with 148 rules applied. Total rules applied 875 place count 365 transition count 1364
Discarding 172 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 172 rule applications. Total rules 1047 place count 193 transition count 1192
Iterating global reduction 2 with 172 rules applied. Total rules applied 1219 place count 193 transition count 1192
Applied a total of 1219 rules in 83 ms. Remains 193 /818 variables (removed 625) and now considering 1192/1786 (removed 594) transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:22:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 241 transitions (discarded 951 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 241 rows 193 cols
[2024-05-24 20:22:05] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-24 20:22:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 149 ms returned [36, 52, 61, 79, 83, 87, 95, 103, 107, 111, 115, 119, 127, 134, 160, 164, 168, 174]
Discarding 18 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 151 ms to find 18 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 175/818 places, 1192/1786 transitions.
Discarding 60 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 60 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 115 transition count 1132
Iterating global reduction 0 with 60 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 115 transition count 1132
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 121 place count 114 transition count 1131
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 114 transition count 1131
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 123 place count 113 transition count 1130
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 113 transition count 1130
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 125 place count 112 transition count 1129
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 112 transition count 1129
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 128 place count 110 transition count 1127
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 110 transition count 1127
Applied a total of 130 rules in 12 ms. Remains 110 /175 variables (removed 65) and now considering 1127/1192 (removed 65) transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:22:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 145 transitions (discarded 982 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 145 rows 110 cols
[2024-05-24 20:22:05] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 20:22:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 99 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 20:22:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 145 transitions (discarded 982 similar events)
[2024-05-24 20:22:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 20:22:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 157 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 258 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 110/818 places, 1127/1786 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 506 ms. Remains : 110/818 places, 1127/1786 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:22:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2024-05-24 20:22:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2024-05-24 20:22:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1127 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:22:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2024-05-24 20:22:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2024-05-24 20:22:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13697244223928225916.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 20:22:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9194592672495743743.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13697244223928225916.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9194592672495743743.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,84587,1.1875,44628,2,7312,5,124428,6,0,1533,80750,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AX(EG(((NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode4>=1)&&(Node5WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode4>=1)))) * ((AX(((Node23HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToRep...512
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(EG(((NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode4>=1)&&(Node5WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode4>=...1502
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t6, t7, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23, t27...6232
(forward)formula 0,1,11.9682,376584,1,0,3290,1.39329e+06,2277,1138,10303,1.23625e+06,2287
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2024-05-24 20:22:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 36 ms
[2024-05-24 20:22:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 37 ms
Total runtime 354544 ms.

BK_STOP 1716582138014

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r224-tall-171649612600362"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2.tgz
mv LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;