fond
Model Checking Contest 2024
14th edition, Geneva, Switzerland, June 25, 2024
Execution of r224-tall-171649612500322
Last Updated
July 7, 2024

About the Execution of ITS-Tools for LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
8930.487 1411783.00 1454746.00 3796.70 FTFTFTFFFFTFFTTF normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r224-tall-171649612500322.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r224-tall-171649612500322
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 800K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 86K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.2K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 56K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.8K Apr 22 14:51 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K Apr 22 14:51 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.1K Apr 22 14:51 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K Apr 22 14:51 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 21K Apr 12 13:50 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 140K Apr 12 13:50 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K Apr 12 13:50 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 99K Apr 12 13:49 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K Apr 22 14:51 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K Apr 22 14:51 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 254K May 18 16:42 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-2023-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716578172133

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-24 19:16:13] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-24 19:16:13] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-24 19:16:13] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 83 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:13] [INFO ] Transformed 462 places.
[2024-05-24 19:16:13] [INFO ] Transformed 409 transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:16:13] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 462 places and 409 transitions and 1324 arcs in 179 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 12 ms.
Support contains 113 out of 462 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 462/462 places, 409/409 transitions.
Reduce places removed 85 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 85 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 377 transition count 409
Discarding 57 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 57 rule applications. Total rules 142 place count 320 transition count 352
Iterating global reduction 1 with 57 rules applied. Total rules applied 199 place count 320 transition count 352
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 228 place count 291 transition count 323
Iterating global reduction 1 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 291 transition count 323
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 276 place count 272 transition count 304
Iterating global reduction 1 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 295 place count 272 transition count 304
Applied a total of 295 rules in 81 ms. Remains 272 /462 variables (removed 190) and now considering 304/409 (removed 105) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 304 rows 272 cols
[2024-05-24 19:16:13] [INFO ] Computed 30 invariants in 26 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 314 ms returned [4, 113, 115, 145, 226]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 346 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 267/462 places, 304/409 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 265 transition count 302
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 265 transition count 302
Applied a total of 4 rules in 9 ms. Remains 265 /267 variables (removed 2) and now considering 302/304 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 302 rows 265 cols
[2024-05-24 19:16:13] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 12 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 202 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 19:16:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 19:16:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 203 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 408 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 265/462 places, 302/409 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 860 ms. Remains : 265/462 places, 302/409 transitions.
Support contains 113 out of 265 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-24 19:16:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 43 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 302 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 86 to 85
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1496 resets) in 2089 ms. (19 steps per ms) remains 4/85 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (187 resets) in 309 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 3/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (301 resets) in 252 ms. (158 steps per ms) remains 2/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (185 resets) in 184 ms. (216 steps per ms) remains 1/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 23471 steps (108 resets) in 96 ms. (241 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
[2024-05-24 19:16:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 302 transitions.
Computed a total of 265 stabilizing places and 302 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 265 transition count 302
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
AF dead knowledge conclusive for 4 formulas.
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-2024-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-2024-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 265/265 places, 302/302 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 652 edges and 265 vertex of which 264 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 48 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 48 transitions
Performed 48 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 48
Iterating post reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 264 transition count 253
Reduce places removed 48 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 1 with 51 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 216 transition count 250
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 213 transition count 250
Performed 14 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 14 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 213 transition count 236
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 199 transition count 236
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 147 place count 183 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 183 transition count 220
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 164 place count 182 transition count 219
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 165 place count 182 transition count 219
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 166 place count 181 transition count 218
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 167 place count 181 transition count 218
Performed 28 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 28
Deduced a syphon composed of 28 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 28 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 223 place count 153 transition count 190
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 232 place count 144 transition count 181
Iterating global reduction 3 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 144 transition count 181
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 144 transition count 180
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 243 place count 143 transition count 180
Applied a total of 243 rules in 79 ms. Remains 143 /265 variables (removed 122) and now considering 180/302 (removed 122) transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:16:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 179 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 179 rows 143 cols
[2024-05-24 19:16:15] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 111 ms returned [5, 12, 20, 27, 30, 33, 40, 43, 47, 62, 72, 75, 82, 90, 98, 101, 104, 112, 117, 123]
Discarding 20 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 112 ms to find 20 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 123/265 places, 180/302 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 123 transition count 179
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 122 transition count 179
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 122 transition count 172
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 115 transition count 172
Discarding 47 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 47 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 68 transition count 125
Iterating global reduction 2 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 68 transition count 125
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 120 place count 58 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 58 transition count 115
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 135 place count 53 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 53 transition count 110
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 45 transition count 102
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 157 place count 44 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 158 place count 44 transition count 101
Applied a total of 158 rules in 20 ms. Remains 44 /123 variables (removed 79) and now considering 101/180 (removed 79) transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:16:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 55 transitions (discarded 46 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 55 rows 44 cols
[2024-05-24 19:16:15] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 19:16:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 55 transitions (discarded 46 similar events)
[2024-05-24 19:16:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 19:16:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 57 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 101 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 44/265 places, 101/302 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 312 ms. Remains : 44/265 places, 101/302 transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:16:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 101 transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:16:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12480397619892990588.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8233387922498563976.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12480397619892990588.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8233387922498563976.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,43269,0.0966,7204,2,1609,5,19716,6,0,268,15528,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(E(A((LxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode7>=1) U !(((Node6HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode2>=1)&&(LeafSetOfLxIsSentToNode6>=1)))) U ((Nod...280
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(EG(E(!((E(!(!(((Node6HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode2>=1)&&(LeafSetOfLxIsSentToNode6>=1)))) U (!...540
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 99/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,0.57503,25736,1,0,26,113920,19,3,1357,93436,25
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-2024-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 265/265 places, 302/302 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 652 edges and 265 vertex of which 264 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 44 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 44 transitions
Performed 44 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 44
Iterating post reduction 0 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 264 transition count 257
Reduce places removed 44 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 1 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 220 transition count 254
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 217 transition count 254
Performed 17 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 17 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 217 transition count 237
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 200 transition count 237
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 145 place count 184 transition count 221
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 184 transition count 221
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 164 place count 181 transition count 218
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 167 place count 181 transition count 218
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 168 place count 180 transition count 217
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 180 transition count 217
Performed 26 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 26
Deduced a syphon composed of 26 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 26 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 221 place count 154 transition count 191
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 230 place count 145 transition count 182
Iterating global reduction 3 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 239 place count 145 transition count 182
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 240 place count 144 transition count 181
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 144 transition count 181
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 143 transition count 181
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 244 place count 142 transition count 180
Applied a total of 244 rules in 52 ms. Remains 142 /265 variables (removed 123) and now considering 180/302 (removed 122) transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:16:16] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 179 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 179 rows 142 cols
[2024-05-24 19:16:16] [INFO ] Computed 24 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 97 ms returned [5, 12, 18, 25, 28, 31, 38, 41, 63, 72, 75, 82, 85, 88, 95, 98, 103, 110, 115]
Discarding 19 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 98 ms to find 19 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 123/265 places, 180/302 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 123 transition count 179
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 122 transition count 179
Discarding 41 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 41 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 81 transition count 138
Iterating global reduction 2 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 81 transition count 138
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 94 place count 71 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 71 transition count 128
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 119 place count 56 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 2 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 56 transition count 113
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 9
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 47 transition count 104
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 153 place count 46 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 46 transition count 103
Applied a total of 154 rules in 14 ms. Remains 46 /123 variables (removed 77) and now considering 103/180 (removed 77) transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:16:16] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 59 transitions (discarded 44 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 59 rows 46 cols
[2024-05-24 19:16:16] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 19:16:16] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 59 transitions (discarded 44 similar events)
[2024-05-24 19:16:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 19:16:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 63 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 110 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 46/265 places, 103/302 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 274 ms. Remains : 46/265 places, 103/302 transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:16:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 103 transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:16:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1764546640448616208.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16009005013931631354.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1764546640448616208.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16009005013931631354.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,50365,0.21261,13360,2,5784,5,39466,6,0,278,34003,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(!(A(E((((Node3HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode8>=1)&&(LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode3>=1))&&((Node7ManageTheBreakDownOfNode4>=1)||((Node0I...509
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(E(!(((Node4HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode3>=1)||((RequestOfNode1IsSentToLx>=1)&&(LxIs...1044
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t14, t23, t32, t34, t35, t36, t37, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t44, t45, t46, t47, t48, ...516
(forward)formula 0,1,1.99096,72776,1,0,308,387679,241,121,1926,350548,247
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-2024-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 265/265 places, 302/302 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 652 edges and 265 vertex of which 264 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 36 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 36 transitions
Performed 36 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 36
Iterating post reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 264 transition count 265
Reduce places removed 36 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 12 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 12
Iterating post reduction 1 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 228 transition count 253
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 216 transition count 253
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 216 transition count 241
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 204 transition count 241
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 137 place count 188 transition count 225
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 153 place count 188 transition count 225
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 155 place count 186 transition count 223
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 157 place count 186 transition count 223
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 158 place count 185 transition count 222
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 159 place count 185 transition count 222
Performed 27 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 27
Deduced a syphon composed of 27 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 27 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 213 place count 158 transition count 195
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 220 place count 151 transition count 188
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 227 place count 151 transition count 188
Applied a total of 227 rules in 34 ms. Remains 151 /265 variables (removed 114) and now considering 188/302 (removed 114) transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:16:18] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 187 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 187 rows 151 cols
[2024-05-24 19:16:18] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 93 ms returned [5, 12, 20, 28, 36, 44, 53, 63, 67, 96, 99, 109, 112, 119, 124, 130]
Discarding 16 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 95 ms to find 16 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 135/265 places, 188/302 transitions.
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 135 transition count 184
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 131 transition count 184
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 103 transition count 156
Iterating global reduction 0 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 103 transition count 156
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 94 transition count 147
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 94 transition count 147
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 99 place count 77 transition count 130
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 77 transition count 130
Performed 10 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 67 transition count 120
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 137 place count 66 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 66 transition count 119
Applied a total of 138 rules in 11 ms. Remains 66 /135 variables (removed 69) and now considering 119/188 (removed 69) transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:16:19] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 82 transitions (discarded 37 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 82 rows 66 cols
[2024-05-24 19:16:19] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 19:16:19] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 82 transitions (discarded 37 similar events)
[2024-05-24 19:16:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 19:16:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 103 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 66/265 places, 119/302 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 244 ms. Remains : 66/265 places, 119/302 transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:16:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 119 transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:16:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7520580371536134353.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1279595654138614802.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7520580371536134353.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1279595654138614802.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,134330,0.153674,10336,2,3911,5,31206,6,0,374,33224,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(A((AG((Node5HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode2>=1)) * ((EF((((Node2HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode0>=1)&&(LeafSetOfLxIsSentToNode2>=1)...815
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!((E(!(!(((NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode5>=1)&&(Node6WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode5>=1)))) U (!((...1078
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t21, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t54, t55, t56, t57, t58, t59, t60, t61, t62...524
(forward)formula 0,1,2.64671,84656,1,0,404,437372,281,172,2579,470471,352
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-2024-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 265/265 places, 302/302 transitions.
Discarding 34 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 34 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 231 transition count 268
Iterating global reduction 0 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 231 transition count 268
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 92 place count 207 transition count 244
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 207 transition count 244
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 6 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 201 transition count 244
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 139 place count 184 transition count 227
Iterating global reduction 1 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 184 transition count 227
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 7 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 177 transition count 227
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 176 place count 164 transition count 214
Iterating global reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 189 place count 164 transition count 214
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 201 place count 152 transition count 202
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 213 place count 152 transition count 202
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 225 place count 140 transition count 190
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 140 transition count 190
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 258 place count 119 transition count 169
Iterating global reduction 2 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 279 place count 119 transition count 169
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 303 place count 95 transition count 145
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 327 place count 95 transition count 145
Applied a total of 327 rules in 34 ms. Remains 95 /265 variables (removed 170) and now considering 145/302 (removed 157) transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:16:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 107 transitions (discarded 38 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 107 rows 95 cols
[2024-05-24 19:16:21] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned [22, 26, 45, 54, 59, 72, 83]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 69 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 88/265 places, 145/302 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 70 transition count 127
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 70 transition count 127
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 69 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 69 transition count 126
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 68 transition count 125
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 68 transition count 125
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 67 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 67 transition count 124
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 65 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 65 transition count 122
Applied a total of 46 rules in 5 ms. Remains 65 /88 variables (removed 23) and now considering 122/145 (removed 23) transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:16:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 76 transitions (discarded 46 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 76 rows 65 cols
[2024-05-24 19:16:22] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 19:16:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 76 transitions (discarded 46 similar events)
[2024-05-24 19:16:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 19:16:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 62 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 108 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 65/265 places, 122/302 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 216 ms. Remains : 65/265 places, 122/302 transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:16:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 122 transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:16:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15920982350387597596.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2859549855645635824.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15920982350387597596.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2859549855645635824.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,367911,0.138628,8984,2,2527,5,24340,6,0,372,30582,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((EF(((Node7HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode8<1)||(LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode7<1))) * ((AX(AX(EX((Node5ManageTheBreakDownOfNode2>=1))))...439
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(E(TRUE U ((Node7HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode8<1)||(LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode7<1))) * ((!(EX(!(!...761
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t6, t7, t8, t9, t14, t15, t16, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t29, t30, t31,...540
(forward)formula 0,0,3.45882,118084,1,0,421,598121,276,174,2475,686660,381
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-2024-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 265/265 places, 302/302 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 652 edges and 265 vertex of which 264 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 53 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 53 transitions
Performed 53 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 53
Iterating post reduction 0 with 53 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 264 transition count 248
Reduce places removed 53 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 53 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 211 transition count 248
Performed 16 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 16 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 211 transition count 232
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 195 transition count 232
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 158 place count 176 transition count 213
Iterating global reduction 2 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 177 place count 176 transition count 213
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 179 place count 174 transition count 211
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 181 place count 174 transition count 211
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 182 place count 173 transition count 210
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 183 place count 173 transition count 210
Performed 27 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 27
Deduced a syphon composed of 27 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 27 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 146 transition count 183
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 246 place count 137 transition count 174
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 137 transition count 174
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 137 transition count 173
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 136 transition count 173
Applied a total of 257 rules in 25 ms. Remains 136 /265 variables (removed 129) and now considering 173/302 (removed 129) transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:16:25] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 172 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 172 rows 136 cols
[2024-05-24 19:16:25] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 94 ms returned [5, 12, 15, 18, 25, 28, 31, 38, 41, 45, 54, 58, 67, 70, 78, 81, 84, 92, 95, 98, 105, 110, 116]
Discarding 23 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 99 ms to find 23 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 113/265 places, 173/302 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 113 transition count 172
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 112 transition count 172
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 112 transition count 167
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 107 transition count 167
Discarding 51 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 51 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 56 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 2 with 51 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 56 transition count 116
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 127 place count 43 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 43 transition count 103
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 148 place count 35 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 35 transition count 95
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 166 place count 30 transition count 90
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 167 place count 29 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 168 place count 29 transition count 89
Applied a total of 168 rules in 9 ms. Remains 29 /113 variables (removed 84) and now considering 89/173 (removed 84) transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:16:25] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 32 transitions (discarded 57 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 29 cols
[2024-05-24 19:16:25] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 29 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 19:16:25] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 32 transitions (discarded 57 similar events)
[2024-05-24 19:16:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 19:16:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 38 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 68 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 29/265 places, 89/302 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 201 ms. Remains : 29/265 places, 89/302 transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:16:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 89 transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:16:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability196151538087955387.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15218006455087537987.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability196151538087955387.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15218006455087537987.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,10356,0.039099,5108,2,899,5,10011,6,0,196,5917,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG(AG(((Node5ManageTheBreakDownOfNode6<1) + AF((LxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode6<1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!(E(TRUE U !(((Node5ManageTheBreakDownOfNode6<1) + !(EG(!((LxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode6<1)))))...170
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t6, t7, t8, t9, t11, t12, t13, t14, t16, t17, t18, t19, t21, t22, t23, t24, t...517
dead was empty
(forward)formula 0,1,0.311175,16716,1,0,286,89635,206,101,1267,71859,219
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-2024-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 265/265 places, 302/302 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 652 edges and 265 vertex of which 264 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.4 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 52 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 52 transitions
Performed 52 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 52
Iterating post reduction 0 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 264 transition count 249
Reduce places removed 52 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 53 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 212 transition count 248
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 211 transition count 248
Performed 16 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 16 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 211 transition count 232
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 195 transition count 232
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 158 place count 176 transition count 213
Iterating global reduction 3 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 177 place count 176 transition count 213
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 179 place count 174 transition count 211
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 181 place count 174 transition count 211
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 182 place count 173 transition count 210
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 183 place count 173 transition count 210
Performed 27 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 27
Deduced a syphon composed of 27 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 27 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 146 transition count 183
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 245 place count 138 transition count 175
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 253 place count 138 transition count 175
Applied a total of 253 rules in 26 ms. Remains 138 /265 variables (removed 127) and now considering 175/302 (removed 127) transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:16:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 174 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 174 rows 138 cols
[2024-05-24 19:16:26] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 99 ms returned [5, 12, 15, 18, 25, 28, 31, 38, 41, 45, 54, 58, 67, 80, 83, 86, 93, 96, 99, 106, 111, 117]
Discarding 22 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 100 ms to find 22 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 116/265 places, 175/302 transitions.
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 116 transition count 169
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 110 transition count 169
Discarding 51 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 51 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 59 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 51 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 59 transition count 118
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 127 place count 46 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 46 transition count 105
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 148 place count 38 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 38 transition count 97
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 168 place count 32 transition count 91
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 169 place count 31 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 170 place count 31 transition count 90
Applied a total of 170 rules in 7 ms. Remains 31 /116 variables (removed 85) and now considering 90/175 (removed 85) transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:16:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 32 transitions (discarded 58 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 31 cols
[2024-05-24 19:16:26] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 29 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 19:16:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 32 transitions (discarded 58 similar events)
[2024-05-24 19:16:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 19:16:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 40 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 72 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 31/265 places, 90/302 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 205 ms. Remains : 31/265 places, 90/302 transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:16:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 90 transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:16:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4624609668735332850.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8231128264259167025.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4624609668735332850.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8231128264259167025.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,12258,0.038915,5064,2,962,5,9092,6,0,205,6007,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(((Node5HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode6>=1)&&(LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode5>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(((Node5HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode6>=1)&&(LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode5>=1))...169
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t6, t7, t8, t9, t11, t12, t13, t14, t16, t17, t18, t19, t21, t22, t23, t24, t...517
(forward)formula 0,0,0.237976,14176,1,0,263,76541,202,95,1313,59463,193
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-2024-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 265/265 places, 302/302 transitions.
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 234 transition count 271
Iterating global reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 234 transition count 271
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 84 place count 212 transition count 249
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 212 transition count 249
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 6 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 206 transition count 249
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 128 place count 190 transition count 233
Iterating global reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 190 transition count 233
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 5 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 185 transition count 233
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 161 place count 173 transition count 221
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 173 place count 173 transition count 221
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 183 place count 163 transition count 211
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 193 place count 163 transition count 211
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 203 place count 153 transition count 201
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 213 place count 153 transition count 201
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 235 place count 131 transition count 179
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 131 transition count 179
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 274 place count 114 transition count 162
Iterating global reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 291 place count 114 transition count 162
Applied a total of 291 rules in 13 ms. Remains 114 /265 variables (removed 151) and now considering 162/302 (removed 140) transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:16:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 127 transitions (discarded 35 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 127 rows 114 cols
[2024-05-24 19:16:26] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned [18, 22, 26, 31, 69, 73, 87]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 65 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 107/265 places, 162/302 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 88 transition count 143
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 88 transition count 143
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 87 transition count 142
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 87 transition count 142
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 86 transition count 141
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 86 transition count 141
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 85 transition count 140
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 85 transition count 140
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 83 transition count 138
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 83 transition count 138
Applied a total of 48 rules in 3 ms. Remains 83 /107 variables (removed 24) and now considering 138/162 (removed 24) transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:16:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 96 transitions (discarded 42 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 96 rows 83 cols
[2024-05-24 19:16:26] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 113 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 19:16:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 96 transitions (discarded 42 similar events)
[2024-05-24 19:16:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 19:16:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 102 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 217 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 83/265 places, 138/302 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 298 ms. Remains : 83/265 places, 138/302 transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:16:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 138 transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:16:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4218735761249403606.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability506770227155758424.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4218735761249403606.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability506770227155758424.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,628315,0.272572,13588,2,3908,5,41858,6,0,460,62350,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((((Node1DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1)&&(Node4IsActive>=1)) * ((EX((Node8HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode6>=1)) + E(!(EF(((Node4HasAskedItsLeafS...971
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(EG(!((!(E(TRUE U !((((!((Node3DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1)&&(Node5IsActive>=1)))||((Node2DontAnswe...1871
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t14, t15, t17, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t28, t29, t30, t31...530
(forward)formula 0,0,9.49366,283176,1,0,677,1.60481e+06,332,332,3030,1.97013e+06,630
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-2024-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 265/265 places, 302/302 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 652 edges and 265 vertex of which 264 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 43 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 43 transitions
Performed 43 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 43
Iterating post reduction 0 with 43 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 264 transition count 258
Reduce places removed 43 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 1 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 221 transition count 254
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 217 transition count 254
Performed 17 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 17 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 217 transition count 237
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 200 transition count 237
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 151 place count 178 transition count 215
Iterating global reduction 3 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 173 place count 178 transition count 215
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 180 place count 171 transition count 208
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 187 place count 171 transition count 208
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 187 place count 171 transition count 207
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 189 place count 170 transition count 207
Performed 26 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 26
Deduced a syphon composed of 26 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 26 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 144 transition count 181
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 246 place count 139 transition count 176
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 251 place count 139 transition count 176
Applied a total of 251 rules in 53 ms. Remains 139 /265 variables (removed 126) and now considering 176/302 (removed 126) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 176 rows 139 cols
[2024-05-24 19:16:36] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 231 ms returned [9, 16, 19, 22, 29, 32, 35, 42, 45, 49, 58, 62, 71, 74, 81, 84, 87, 94, 97, 100, 112, 118]
Discarding 22 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 233 ms to find 22 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 117/265 places, 176/302 transitions.
Discarding 45 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 45 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 72 transition count 131
Iterating global reduction 0 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 72 transition count 131
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 104 place count 58 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 58 transition count 117
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 138 place count 38 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 158 place count 38 transition count 97
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 166 place count 34 transition count 93
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 167 place count 33 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 168 place count 33 transition count 92
Applied a total of 168 rules in 8 ms. Remains 33 /117 variables (removed 84) and now considering 92/176 (removed 84) transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:16:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 33 transitions (discarded 59 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 33 rows 33 cols
[2024-05-24 19:16:36] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 19:16:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 33 transitions (discarded 59 similar events)
[2024-05-24 19:16:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 19:16:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 56 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 89 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 33/265 places, 92/302 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 383 ms. Remains : 33/265 places, 92/302 transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:16:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:16:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11489279813449867566.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4180586414149850583.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11489279813449867566.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4180586414149850583.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,11243,0.033669,4812,2,829,5,7815,6,0,215,4944,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!((((Node1IsActive>=1)&&(Node7DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1)) * EG(((RxIsActiveAndNotInTheLeafSet>=1)&&(ANodeFromTheLeafSetOfRxIsACtiveInTheLe...399
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,!((((Node1IsActive>=1)&&(Node7DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1)) * EG(((RxIsActiveAndNotInTheLeafSet>=1)&&(AN...872
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t6, t26, t27, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t34, t35, t36, t37, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t44, ...488
(forward)formula 0,0,0.339163,17976,1,0,316,92987,221,120,1415,76142,263
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-2024-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 265/265 places, 302/302 transitions.
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 236 transition count 273
Iterating global reduction 0 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 236 transition count 273
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 79 place count 215 transition count 252
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 215 transition count 252
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 5 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 210 transition count 252
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 120 place count 195 transition count 237
Iterating global reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 195 transition count 237
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 191 transition count 237
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 148 place count 182 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 157 place count 182 transition count 228
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 165 place count 174 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 173 place count 174 transition count 220
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 181 place count 166 transition count 212
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 189 place count 166 transition count 212
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 206 place count 149 transition count 195
Iterating global reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 223 place count 149 transition count 195
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 237 place count 135 transition count 181
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 251 place count 135 transition count 181
Applied a total of 251 rules in 20 ms. Remains 135 /265 variables (removed 130) and now considering 181/302 (removed 121) transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:16:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 154 transitions (discarded 27 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 154 rows 135 cols
[2024-05-24 19:16:37] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned [44, 71, 78, 107, 112, 116]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 71 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 129/265 places, 181/302 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 114 transition count 166
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 114 transition count 166
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 112 transition count 164
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 112 transition count 164
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 110 transition count 162
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 110 transition count 162
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 108 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 108 transition count 160
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 105 transition count 157
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 105 transition count 157
Applied a total of 48 rules in 5 ms. Remains 105 /129 variables (removed 24) and now considering 157/181 (removed 24) transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:16:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 122 transitions (discarded 35 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 122 rows 105 cols
[2024-05-24 19:16:37] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 6 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 19:16:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 122 transitions (discarded 35 similar events)
[2024-05-24 19:16:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 19:16:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 93 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 153 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 105/265 places, 157/302 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 249 ms. Remains : 105/265 places, 157/302 transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:16:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 157 transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:16:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16620528435790540678.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 19:16:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5005107231105656903.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16620528435790540678.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5005107231105656903.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.03486e+06,1.59345,55016,2,10117,5,204857,6,0,567,316466,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(E(((Node2HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode5>=1)&&(LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode2>=1)) U !(((Node3WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode8>=1)&&(NoN...684
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,E(((Node2HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode5>=1)&&(LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode2>=1)) U !(((Node3WantsTo...941
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t7, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t15, t17, t22, t24, t27, t29, t31, t36, t38, t39, t40, t4...556
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-24 19:17:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-24 19:17:07] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-24 19:17:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2225228297180102532.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2225228297180102532.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2225228297180102532.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2225228297180102532.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2225228297180102532.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-24 19:17:07] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-24 19:17:07] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-24 19:17:07] [INFO ] Removed a total of 102 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:17:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 41 ms
[2024-05-24 19:17:07] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 17 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2024-05-24 19:17:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6418298579584251258.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 19:17:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6697369102785740637.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6418298579584251258.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6697369102785740637.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.03486e+06,4.92806,137520,7979,788,194321,11020,450,801339,96,83466,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(E(((i8.u12.Node2HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode5>=1)&&(i8.u14.LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode2>=1)) U !(((i3.u21.Node3WantsToManageTheBreak...786
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,E(((i8.u12.Node2HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode5>=1)&&(i8.u14.LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode2>=1)) U !(...1069
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t9, t10, t11, t12, t17, t24, t27, t31, t39, t40, t43, t49, t57, t59, t64, t68, t70, t74, t99,...711
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 265/265 places, 302/302 transitions.
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 229 transition count 266
Iterating global reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 229 transition count 266
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 98 place count 203 transition count 240
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 203 transition count 240
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 7 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 196 transition count 240
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 150 place count 177 transition count 221
Iterating global reduction 1 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 177 transition count 221
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 7 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 176 place count 170 transition count 221
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 191 place count 155 transition count 206
Iterating global reduction 2 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 206 place count 155 transition count 206
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 219 place count 142 transition count 193
Iterating global reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 232 place count 142 transition count 193
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 245 place count 129 transition count 180
Iterating global reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 258 place count 129 transition count 180
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 286 place count 101 transition count 152
Iterating global reduction 2 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 314 place count 101 transition count 152
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 340 place count 75 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 2 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 366 place count 75 transition count 126
Applied a total of 366 rules in 21 ms. Remains 75 /265 variables (removed 190) and now considering 126/302 (removed 176) transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:17:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 78 transitions (discarded 48 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 75 cols
[2024-05-24 19:17:37] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 19:17:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned [18, 22, 26, 35, 39, 43, 52, 65]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 54 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 67/265 places, 126/302 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 51 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 51 transition count 110
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 50 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 50 transition count 109
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 49 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 49 transition count 108
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 48 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 48 transition count 107
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 47 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 47 transition count 106
Applied a total of 40 rules in 2 ms. Remains 47 /67 variables (removed 20) and now considering 106/126 (removed 20) transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:17:38] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 51 transitions (discarded 55 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 51 rows 47 cols
[2024-05-24 19:17:38] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 19:17:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 19:17:38] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 51 transitions (discarded 55 similar events)
[2024-05-24 19:17:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 19:17:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 46 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 85 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 47/265 places, 106/302 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 162 ms. Remains : 47/265 places, 106/302 transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:17:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 19:17:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 19:17:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 106 transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:17:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 19:17:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 19:17:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16251322051770250309.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 19:17:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8720581384875149748.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16251322051770250309.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8720581384875149748.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,147689,0.184135,11260,2,2348,5,43673,6,0,284,34793,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E(!(A(!(((AF(((Node8HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode7>=1)&&(LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode8>=1))) * (Node0IsActive>=1)) * (Node4DontAnswerT...287
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,!(!((E(!(!(!(E(TRUE U !((Node7ManageTheBreakDownOfNode3>=1)))))) U (!(!(((!(EG(!(((Node8HasAsked...488
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t6, t7, t8, t9, t14, t15, t16, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t27, t28, t29, t30...526
(forward)formula 0,0,1.52213,60340,1,0,323,315070,250,117,1916,316220,264
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-2024-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 265/265 places, 302/302 transitions.
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 236 transition count 273
Iterating global reduction 0 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 236 transition count 273
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 78 place count 216 transition count 253
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 216 transition count 253
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 212 transition count 253
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 115 place count 199 transition count 240
Iterating global reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 199 transition count 240
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 196 transition count 240
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 138 place count 189 transition count 233
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 145 place count 189 transition count 233
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 150 place count 184 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 155 place count 184 transition count 228
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 160 place count 179 transition count 223
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 165 place count 179 transition count 223
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 175 place count 169 transition count 213
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 185 place count 169 transition count 213
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 195 place count 159 transition count 203
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 205 place count 159 transition count 203
Applied a total of 205 rules in 23 ms. Remains 159 /265 variables (removed 106) and now considering 203/302 (removed 99) transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:17:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 184 transitions (discarded 19 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 184 rows 159 cols
[2024-05-24 19:17:39] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-24 19:17:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 90 ms returned [9, 20, 31, 36, 44, 66, 88, 101, 105, 112, 122, 141]
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 91 ms to find 12 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 147/265 places, 203/302 transitions.
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 114 transition count 170
Iterating global reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 114 transition count 170
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 109 transition count 165
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 109 transition count 165
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 80 place count 105 transition count 161
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 105 transition count 161
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 88 place count 101 transition count 157
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 101 transition count 157
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 96 place count 97 transition count 153
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 97 transition count 153
Applied a total of 100 rules in 4 ms. Remains 97 /147 variables (removed 50) and now considering 153/203 (removed 50) transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:17:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 121 transitions (discarded 32 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 121 rows 97 cols
[2024-05-24 19:17:39] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-24 19:17:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 19:17:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 121 transitions (discarded 32 similar events)
[2024-05-24 19:17:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 19:17:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 63 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 106 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 97/265 places, 153/302 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 225 ms. Remains : 97/265 places, 153/302 transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:17:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 19:17:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-24 19:17:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 153 transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:17:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 19:17:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 19:17:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10149671354639217038.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 19:17:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2035952455765695106.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10149671354639217038.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2035952455765695106.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.0705e+06,0.320415,15800,2,8153,5,47052,6,0,531,53539,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(E(((EG((((Node0ManageTheBreakDownOfNode6>=1)&&(RequestOfNode2IsSentToRx>=1))&&(RxIsActiveAndNotInTheLeafSet>=1))) + !((((Node7ManageTh...1017
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(((EG((((Node0ManageTheBreakDownOfNode6>=1)&&(RequestOfNode2IsSentToRx>=1))&&(RxIsActiveAndNotInTh...1287
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t6, t7, t8, t9, t12, t16, t17, t18, t20, t21, t22, t23, t24, t27, t28, t29, t31, t32, t33...581
(forward)formula 0,0,23.7015,706244,1,0,697,4.33263e+06,371,316,3651,4.5447e+06,655
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 265/265 places, 302/302 transitions.
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 235 transition count 272
Iterating global reduction 0 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 235 transition count 272
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 80 place count 215 transition count 252
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 215 transition count 252
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 5 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 210 transition count 252
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 120 place count 195 transition count 237
Iterating global reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 195 transition count 237
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 191 transition count 237
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 149 place count 181 transition count 227
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 159 place count 181 transition count 227
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 167 place count 173 transition count 219
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 175 place count 173 transition count 219
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 182 place count 166 transition count 212
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 189 place count 166 transition count 212
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 205 place count 150 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 221 place count 150 transition count 196
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 231 place count 140 transition count 186
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 140 transition count 186
Applied a total of 241 rules in 12 ms. Remains 140 /265 variables (removed 125) and now considering 186/302 (removed 116) transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:18:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 162 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 162 rows 140 cols
[2024-05-24 19:18:03] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-24 19:18:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 200 ms returned [18, 37, 53, 58, 112, 117, 121, 125]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 201 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 132/265 places, 186/302 transitions.
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 103 transition count 157
Iterating global reduction 0 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 103 transition count 157
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 102 transition count 156
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 102 transition count 156
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 101 transition count 155
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 101 transition count 155
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 100 transition count 154
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 100 transition count 154
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 99 transition count 153
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 99 transition count 153
Applied a total of 66 rules in 5 ms. Remains 99 /132 variables (removed 33) and now considering 153/186 (removed 33) transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:18:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 121 transitions (discarded 32 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 121 rows 99 cols
[2024-05-24 19:18:04] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-24 19:18:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 19:18:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 121 transitions (discarded 32 similar events)
[2024-05-24 19:18:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 19:18:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 75 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 127 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 99/265 places, 153/302 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 345 ms. Remains : 99/265 places, 153/302 transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:18:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 19:18:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 19:18:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 153 transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:18:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 19:18:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 19:18:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15055611360257355462.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 19:18:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7296909201434788673.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15055611360257355462.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7296909201434788673.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.3231e+06,0.459528,18988,2,6671,5,60825,6,0,539,85066,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF((Node3ManageTheBreakDownOfNode8>=1)) + E((((EF(((Node5IsActive>=1)&&(Node8DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1))) + AF(((Node4HasAskedItsLeafSetToR...853
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(E((((E(TRUE U ((Node5IsActive>=1)&&(Node8DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1))) + !(EG(!(((Node4HasAskedItsLe...925
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t4, t6, t7, t8, t9, t14, t15, t16, t22, t23, t26, t27, t28, t29, t32, t33, t34, t36, t37,...588
(forward)formula 0,1,12.7534,365268,1,0,649,2.11435e+06,367,298,3540,2.36322e+06,585
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 265/265 places, 302/302 transitions.
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 229 transition count 266
Iterating global reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 229 transition count 266
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 99 place count 202 transition count 239
Iterating global reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 202 transition count 239
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 7 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 195 transition count 239
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 154 place count 174 transition count 218
Iterating global reduction 1 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 175 place count 174 transition count 218
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 9 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 184 place count 165 transition count 218
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 201 place count 148 transition count 201
Iterating global reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 218 place count 148 transition count 201
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 232 place count 134 transition count 187
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 246 place count 134 transition count 187
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 260 place count 120 transition count 173
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 274 place count 120 transition count 173
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 303 place count 91 transition count 144
Iterating global reduction 2 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 332 place count 91 transition count 144
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 361 place count 62 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 2 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 390 place count 62 transition count 115
Applied a total of 390 rules in 12 ms. Remains 62 /265 variables (removed 203) and now considering 115/302 (removed 187) transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:18:17] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 65 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 65 rows 62 cols
[2024-05-24 19:18:17] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 19:18:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned [18, 23, 41, 45, 49, 53]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 55 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 56/265 places, 115/302 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 44 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 44 transition count 103
Applied a total of 24 rules in 1 ms. Remains 44 /56 variables (removed 12) and now considering 103/115 (removed 12) transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:18:17] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 49 transitions (discarded 54 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 49 rows 44 cols
[2024-05-24 19:18:17] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 19:18:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 19:18:17] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 49 transitions (discarded 54 similar events)
[2024-05-24 19:18:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 19:18:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 46 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 80 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 44/265 places, 103/302 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 148 ms. Remains : 44/265 places, 103/302 transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:18:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 19:18:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 19:18:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 103 transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:18:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 19:18:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 19:18:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1238247000230365223.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 19:18:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10582804990178317673.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1238247000230365223.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10582804990178317673.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,124184,0.051307,5456,2,1112,5,10905,6,0,269,10114,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EG(!(A(((Node0WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode2>=1)&&(NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode2>=1)) U (LxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode2>=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),!(!((E(!((LxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode2>=1)) U (!(((Node0WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode2>=1)&&(...294
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t7, t8, t9, t10, t15, t16, t17, t19, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t27, t29, t32, t33...506
(forward)formula 0,1,2.30315,83536,1,0,508,468312,235,228,1727,543538,432
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 265/265 places, 302/302 transitions.
Discarding 35 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 35 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 230 transition count 267
Iterating global reduction 0 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 230 transition count 267
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 96 place count 204 transition count 241
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 204 transition count 241
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 7 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 197 transition count 241
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 148 place count 178 transition count 222
Iterating global reduction 1 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 167 place count 178 transition count 222
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 7 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 171 transition count 222
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 189 place count 156 transition count 207
Iterating global reduction 2 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 204 place count 156 transition count 207
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 217 place count 143 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 230 place count 143 transition count 194
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 243 place count 130 transition count 181
Iterating global reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 256 place count 130 transition count 181
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 284 place count 102 transition count 153
Iterating global reduction 2 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 312 place count 102 transition count 153
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 337 place count 77 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 2 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 362 place count 77 transition count 128
Applied a total of 362 rules in 14 ms. Remains 77 /265 variables (removed 188) and now considering 128/302 (removed 174) transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:18:19] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 81 transitions (discarded 47 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 77 cols
[2024-05-24 19:18:19] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 19:18:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned [18, 27, 35, 44, 48, 63, 67]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 53 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 70/265 places, 128/302 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 56 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 56 transition count 114
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 55 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 55 transition count 113
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 54 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 54 transition count 112
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 53 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 53 transition count 111
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 52 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 52 transition count 110
Applied a total of 36 rules in 2 ms. Remains 52 /70 variables (removed 18) and now considering 110/128 (removed 18) transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:18:19] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 56 transitions (discarded 54 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 52 cols
[2024-05-24 19:18:19] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-24 19:18:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 19:18:19] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 56 transitions (discarded 54 similar events)
[2024-05-24 19:18:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 19:18:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 46 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 78 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 52/265 places, 110/302 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 149 ms. Remains : 52/265 places, 110/302 transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:18:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 19:18:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 19:18:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 110 transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:18:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-24 19:18:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 19:18:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8390874753340721805.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 19:18:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6190718718055112827.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8390874753340721805.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6190718718055112827.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,157999,0.447286,20936,2,5547,5,87489,6,0,308,74227,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EF(((AX(((Node0WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode1>=1)&&(NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode1>=1))) * AG(((Node5DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1)&&(Node8...314
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((((Node6IsActive>=1)&&(Node8DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1)) * !(EX(!((Node2ManageTheBreakDownOfNode7<1...621
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t15, t16, t17, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t28, t30, t31...513
(forward)formula 0,0,8.044,238508,1,0,450,1.31084e+06,253,207,2037,1.31497e+06,376
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2024-05-24 19:18:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-24 19:18:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-24 19:18:27] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-24 19:18:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13346972814752684402.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13346972814752684402.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13346972814752684402.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13346972814752684402.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13346972814752684402.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-24 19:18:27] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-24 19:18:28] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-24 19:18:28] [INFO ] Removed a total of 207 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:18:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2024-05-24 19:18:28] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 10 labels/synchronizations in 8 ms.
[2024-05-24 19:18:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16203901526387912067.gal : 6 ms
[2024-05-24 19:18:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8869314082919930834.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16203901526387912067.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8869314082919930834.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.2123e+06,216.77,2756092,104865,3956,2.12212e+06,209180,1018,2.14816e+07,173,1.08737e+07,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(E(((i10.u23.Node2HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode5>=1)&&(i10.u70.LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode2>=1)) U !(((i5.u31.Node3WantsToManageTheBre...808
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,E(((i10.u23.Node2HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode5>=1)&&(i10.u70.LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode2>=1)) U ...1105
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t18, t29, t39, t51, t53, t59, t66, t72, t76, t92, t98, t100, t111, t113, t120, t135, t143, t1...1036
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2024-05-24 19:29:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2024-05-24 19:29:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9446875692154095799.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 19:29:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9877168041792317907.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9446875692154095799.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9877168041792317907.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.2123e+06,21.3452,565728,2,155470,5,1.64824e+06,6,0,1352,3.72257e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(E(((Node2HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode5>=1)&&(LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode2>=1)) U !(((Node3WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode8>=1)&&(NoN...684
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,E(((Node2HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode5>=1)&&(LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode2>=1)) U !(((Node3WantsTo...941
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t8, t11, t14, t16, t17, t18, t22, t27, t29, t35, t39, t44, t49, t51, t53, t57, t5...707
(forward)formula 0,1,611.188,5658728,1,0,686,3.78067e+07,12,306,4129,2.87199e+07,49
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3-CTLFireability-2024-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Total runtime 1410625 ms.

BK_STOP 1716579583916

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r224-tall-171649612500322"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3.tgz
mv LeafsetExtension-PT-S08C3 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;