About the Execution of ITS-Tools for LamportFastMutEx-COL-2
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
431.531 | 29001.00 | 47088.00 | 286.30 | FFTFFTFFFTFFFFTF | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r224-tall-171649612300204.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is LamportFastMutEx-COL-2, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r224-tall-171649612300204
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 472K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Apr 13 07:34 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 112K Apr 13 07:34 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K Apr 13 07:33 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 56K Apr 13 07:33 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Apr 22 14:51 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K Apr 22 14:51 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.4K Apr 22 14:51 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Apr 22 14:51 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.1K Apr 13 07:35 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 71K Apr 13 07:35 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.9K Apr 13 07:35 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 58K Apr 13 07:35 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K Apr 22 14:51 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Apr 22 14:51 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:42 equiv_pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2 May 18 16:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 38K May 18 16:42 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1716561349201
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=LamportFastMutEx-COL-2
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is COL
LTLFireability COL
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-24 14:35:50] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-24 14:35:50] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-24 14:35:50] [INFO ] Detected file is not PT type :http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.axiom.locator.DefaultOMMetaFactoryLocator).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info.
[2024-05-24 14:35:50] [WARNING] Using fallBack plugin, rng conformance not checked
[2024-05-24 14:35:50] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (colored model parsed with PNMLFW) : 519 ms
[2024-05-24 14:35:50] [INFO ] Imported 18 HL places and 17 HL transitions for a total of 69 PT places and 117.0 transition bindings in 17 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 8 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
[2024-05-24 14:35:51] [INFO ] Built PT skeleton of HLPN with 18 places and 17 transitions 68 arcs in 4 ms.
[2024-05-24 14:35:51] [INFO ] Skeletonized 12 HLPN properties in 7 ms. Removed 4 properties that had guard overlaps.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Computed a total of 3 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Remains 11 properties that can be checked using skeleton over-approximation.
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
RANDOM walk for 10604 steps (1 resets) in 167 ms. (63 steps per ms) remains 0/13 properties
[2024-05-24 14:35:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-24 14:35:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Domain [pid(3), pid(3)] of place P_wait breaks symmetries in sort pid
Symmetric sort wr.t. initial and guards and successors and join/free detected :P_bool
Arc [3:1*[$i, 1]] contains constants of sort P_bool
Transition T_setbi_2 : constants on arcs in [[3:1*[$i, 1]]] introduces in P_bool(2) partition with 1 elements that refines current partition to 2 subsets.
[2024-05-24 14:35:51] [INFO ] Unfolded HLPN to a Petri net with 69 places and 96 transitions 402 arcs in 19 ms.
[2024-05-24 14:35:51] [INFO ] Unfolded 15 HLPN properties in 1 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 25 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 25 places and 34 transitions.
Support contains 40 out of 44 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 44/44 places, 62/62 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 44 /44 variables (removed 0) and now considering 62/62 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-24 14:35:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 56 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 44 cols
[2024-05-24 14:35:51] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 9 ms
[2024-05-24 14:35:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 134 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 14:35:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 56 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2024-05-24 14:35:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 14:35:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 16 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 14:35:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 68 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 228 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 60 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 14:35:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 56 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2024-05-24 14:35:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 14:35:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 16 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
[2024-05-24 14:35:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD2 is UNSAT
[2024-05-24 14:35:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:35:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:35:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
[2024-05-24 14:35:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD10 is UNSAT
[2024-05-24 14:35:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD13 is UNSAT
[2024-05-24 14:35:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD14 is UNSAT
[2024-05-24 14:35:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD15 is UNSAT
[2024-05-24 14:35:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:35:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:35:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:35:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD24 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD27 is UNSAT
[2024-05-24 14:35:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:35:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD28 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD30 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD32 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD33 is UNSAT
[2024-05-24 14:35:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:35:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:35:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:35:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:35:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 19/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 12 solved, 48 unsolved
[2024-05-24 14:35:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:35:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 2/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 12 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 12 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 56/100 variables, 44/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 12 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 16/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 12 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 12 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/100 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 12 solved, 48 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 100/100 variables, and 91 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 12 solved, 48 unsolved in 1433 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 44/44 constraints, ReadFeed: 16/16 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 12 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 12 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 13/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 12 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 12 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/44 variables, 6/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 12 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 8/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 12 solved, 48 unsolved
[2024-05-24 14:35:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 1/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 12 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 12 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 56/100 variables, 44/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 12 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 16/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 12 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 48/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 12 solved, 48 unsolved
[2024-05-24 14:35:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 12 solved, 48 unsolved
[2024-05-24 14:35:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 12 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 12 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/100 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 12 solved, 48 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 100/100 variables, and 142 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 12 solved, 48 unsolved in 1209 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 44/44 constraints, ReadFeed: 16/16 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 48/60 constraints, Known Traps: 24/24 constraints]
After SMT, in 2686ms problems are : Problem set: 12 solved, 48 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 12 dead transitions in 2697ms
Found 12 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 12 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 12 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 44/44 places, 50/62 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 44 /44 variables (removed 0) and now considering 50/50 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 2943 ms. Remains : 44/44 places, 50/62 transitions.
Support contains 40 out of 44 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-24 14:35:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-24 14:35:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-24 14:35:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 50 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 20 to 17
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 505 ms. (79 steps per ms) remains 1/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 246 ms. (161 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2024-05-24 14:35:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 48 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 48 rows 44 cols
[2024-05-24 14:35:54] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-24 14:35:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 14 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 26/34 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 48/82 variables, 34/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 14/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 10/92 variables, 10/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 4/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
[2024-05-24 14:35:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:35:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:35:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp4 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 92/92 variables, and 71 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 121 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 44/44 constraints, ReadFeed: 14/14 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 129ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 14 simplifications.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G(p0)||F(G((p1 U p2)))))'
Support contains 13 out of 44 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 44/44 places, 50/50 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 42 transition count 48
Applied a total of 4 rules in 27 ms. Remains 42 /44 variables (removed 2) and now considering 48/50 (removed 2) transitions.
[2024-05-24 14:35:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 46 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 46 rows 42 cols
[2024-05-24 14:35:55] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-24 14:35:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned [28, 29]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 34 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 40/44 places, 48/50 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 40 /40 variables (removed 0) and now considering 48/48 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 63 ms. Remains : 40/44 places, 48/50 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 235 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-00
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 331 reset in 340 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 117 steps with 1 reset with depth 36 and stack size 36 in 0 ms.
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-00 finished in 692 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 11 out of 44 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 44/44 places, 50/50 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 44 /44 variables (removed 0) and now considering 50/50 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-24 14:35:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 48 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 48 rows 44 cols
[2024-05-24 14:35:55] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 14:35:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 14:35:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 48 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2024-05-24 14:35:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 14:35:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 14 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 14:35:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 46 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 78 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-24 14:35:55] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 48 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 14:35:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 48 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2024-05-24 14:35:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 14:35:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 14 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/44 variables, 6/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
[2024-05-24 14:35:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:35:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:35:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:35:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:35:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:35:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:35:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:35:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:35:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:35:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:35:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:35:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:35:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:35:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:35:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:35:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:35:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:35:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:35:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:35:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
[2024-05-24 14:35:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:35:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:35:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:35:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:35:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:35:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 6/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
[2024-05-24 14:35:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 1/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 48/92 variables, 44/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 14/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
[2024-05-24 14:35:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 1/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/92 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 92/92 variables, and 96 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved in 1651 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 44/44 constraints, ReadFeed: 14/14 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 48/48 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 16/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/44 variables, 6/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 12/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 48/92 variables, 44/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 14/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 48/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
[2024-05-24 14:35:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 1/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
[2024-05-24 14:35:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:35:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/92 variables, 2/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/92 variables, 0/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 92/92 variables, and 147 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved in 1285 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 44/44 constraints, ReadFeed: 14/14 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 48/48 constraints, Known Traps: 31/31 constraints]
After SMT, in 2950ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2951ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3038 ms. Remains : 44/44 places, 50/50 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 65 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-02
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2692 reset in 155 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2709 reset in 179 ms.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 76 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 55 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 71 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (14 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 106 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 59 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 65 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Support contains 11 out of 44 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 44/44 places, 50/50 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 44 /44 variables (removed 0) and now considering 50/50 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-24 14:35:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 48 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2024-05-24 14:35:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 14:35:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 14:35:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 48 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2024-05-24 14:35:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 14:35:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 14 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 14:35:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 47 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 84 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-24 14:35:59] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 48 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 14:35:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 48 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2024-05-24 14:35:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 14:35:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 14 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/44 variables, 6/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
[2024-05-24 14:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
[2024-05-24 14:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 6/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
[2024-05-24 14:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 1/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 48/92 variables, 44/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 14/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
[2024-05-24 14:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 1/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/92 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 92/92 variables, and 96 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved in 1627 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 44/44 constraints, ReadFeed: 14/14 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 48/48 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 16/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/44 variables, 6/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 12/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 48/92 variables, 44/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 14/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 48/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
[2024-05-24 14:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 1/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
[2024-05-24 14:36:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/92 variables, 2/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/92 variables, 0/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 92/92 variables, and 147 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved in 1274 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 44/44 constraints, ReadFeed: 14/14 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 48/48 constraints, Known Traps: 31/31 constraints]
After SMT, in 2910ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2912ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3003 ms. Remains : 44/44 places, 50/50 transitions.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 66 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 71 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 74 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (14 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 98 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 65 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 66 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 69 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2747 reset in 114 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2747 reset in 118 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin13080178435719622428
[2024-05-24 14:36:03] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 50 transitions.
[2024-05-24 14:36:03] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 2 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-24 14:36:03] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 50 transitions.
[2024-05-24 14:36:03] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-24 14:36:03] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 50 transitions.
[2024-05-24 14:36:03] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-24 14:36:03] [INFO ] Built C files in 26ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin13080178435719622428
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin13080178435719622428;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 256 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin13080178435719622428;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 39 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin13080178435719622428;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased11405308847713078344.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 137 ms.
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES PARTIAL_ORDER EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-02 finished in 8040 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((X(X(p0)) U (!p0 U X(G(p1)))))'
Support contains 7 out of 44 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 44/44 places, 50/50 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 44 /44 variables (removed 0) and now considering 50/50 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-24 14:36:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 48 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2024-05-24 14:36:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 14:36:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned [30, 31]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 42 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 42/44 places, 50/50 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 42 /42 variables (removed 0) and now considering 50/50 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 44 ms. Remains : 42/44 places, 50/50 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 284 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), true, (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-03
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 2 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-03 finished in 346 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((X(F(!p0))&&(G(!p1)||X(G(p2))))))'
Support contains 14 out of 44 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 44/44 places, 50/50 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 44 /44 variables (removed 0) and now considering 50/50 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-24 14:36:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 48 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2024-05-24 14:36:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 14:36:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned [30, 31]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 43 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 42/44 places, 50/50 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 42 /42 variables (removed 0) and now considering 50/50 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 45 ms. Remains : 42/44 places, 50/50 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 250 ms :[(OR p0 (AND p1 (NOT p2))), (OR p0 (AND p1 (NOT p2))), p0, (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p2) p1), true, p1]
Running random walk in product with property : LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-04
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 9 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-04 finished in 318 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(((!p1 U (p2||G(!p1)))||p0)))'
Support contains 19 out of 44 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 44/44 places, 50/50 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 44 /44 variables (removed 0) and now considering 50/50 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-24 14:36:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 48 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2024-05-24 14:36:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 14:36:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 14:36:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 48 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2024-05-24 14:36:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 14:36:04] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 14 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 14:36:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 45 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 78 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 48 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 14:36:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 48 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2024-05-24 14:36:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 14:36:04] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 14 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/44 variables, 6/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
[2024-05-24 14:36:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
[2024-05-24 14:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 6/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
[2024-05-24 14:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 1/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 48/92 variables, 44/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 14/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
[2024-05-24 14:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 1/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/92 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 92/92 variables, and 96 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved in 1626 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 44/44 constraints, ReadFeed: 14/14 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 48/48 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 16/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/44 variables, 6/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 12/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 48/92 variables, 44/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 14/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 48/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
[2024-05-24 14:36:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 1/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
[2024-05-24 14:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/92 variables, 2/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/92 variables, 0/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 92/92 variables, and 147 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved in 1253 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 44/44 constraints, ReadFeed: 14/14 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 48/48 constraints, Known Traps: 31/31 constraints]
After SMT, in 2889ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2890ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2970 ms. Remains : 44/44 places, 50/50 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 144 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p2) p1), (AND (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-05
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 123 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 129 ms.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p2 (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X p2), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))))]
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 8 factoid took 18 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 6 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-05 finished in 3404 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((G(!p1)&&p0)))'
Support contains 10 out of 44 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 44/44 places, 50/50 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 42 transition count 48
Applied a total of 4 rules in 6 ms. Remains 42 /44 variables (removed 2) and now considering 48/50 (removed 2) transitions.
[2024-05-24 14:36:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 46 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 46 rows 42 cols
[2024-05-24 14:36:07] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-24 14:36:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned [28, 29]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 41 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 40/44 places, 48/50 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 40 /40 variables (removed 0) and now considering 48/48 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 49 ms. Remains : 40/44 places, 48/50 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 81 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) p1), p1]
Running random walk in product with property : LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-06
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 121 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 77 steps with 0 reset with depth 78 and stack size 75 in 0 ms.
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-06 finished in 263 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F((X(F(p1))&&p0))))'
Support contains 7 out of 44 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 44/44 places, 50/50 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 44 /44 variables (removed 0) and now considering 50/50 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-24 14:36:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 48 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 48 rows 44 cols
[2024-05-24 14:36:08] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 14:36:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned [30, 31]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 43 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 42/44 places, 50/50 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 42 /42 variables (removed 0) and now considering 50/50 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 44 ms. Remains : 42/44 places, 50/50 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 114 ms :[(NOT p1), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-07
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 6246 reset in 86 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 55 steps with 3 reset with depth 12 and stack size 12 in 0 ms.
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-07 finished in 264 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(p0))'
Support contains 5 out of 44 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 44/44 places, 50/50 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 42 transition count 48
Applied a total of 4 rules in 5 ms. Remains 42 /44 variables (removed 2) and now considering 48/50 (removed 2) transitions.
[2024-05-24 14:36:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 46 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 46 rows 42 cols
[2024-05-24 14:36:08] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 14:36:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned [28, 29]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 41 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 40/44 places, 48/50 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 40 /40 variables (removed 0) and now considering 48/48 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 49 ms. Remains : 40/44 places, 48/50 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 30 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-08
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1454 reset in 106 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 45 steps with 0 reset with depth 46 and stack size 46 in 0 ms.
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-08 finished in 203 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X((G(p0)||X(F(!p1))))))'
Support contains 11 out of 44 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 44/44 places, 50/50 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 44 /44 variables (removed 0) and now considering 50/50 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-24 14:36:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 48 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 48 rows 44 cols
[2024-05-24 14:36:08] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 14:36:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned [30, 31]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 38 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 42/44 places, 50/50 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 42 /42 variables (removed 0) and now considering 50/50 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 42 ms. Remains : 42/44 places, 50/50 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 176 ms :[p1, (AND p1 (NOT p0)), (AND p1 (NOT p0)), (AND p1 (NOT p0)), (AND p1 (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-09
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25000 reset in 103 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25000 reset in 92 ms.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 72 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 7 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 136 ms :[p1, p1, p1, p1]
RANDOM walk for 60 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (12 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p1)]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 99 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 146 ms :[p1, p1, p1, p1]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 134 ms :[p1, p1, p1, p1]
Support contains 6 out of 42 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 42/42 places, 50/50 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 42 /42 variables (removed 0) and now considering 50/50 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-24 14:36:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 48 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 48 rows 42 cols
[2024-05-24 14:36:09] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 14:36:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 14:36:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 48 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2024-05-24 14:36:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 14:36:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 10 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 14:36:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 43 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 77 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 48 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 14:36:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 48 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2024-05-24 14:36:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 14:36:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 10 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/42 variables, 4/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
[2024-05-24 14:36:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 13 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 20/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
[2024-05-24 14:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 8/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
[2024-05-24 14:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 1/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 48/90 variables, 42/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 10/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/90 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 90/90 variables, and 89 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved in 1480 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 42/42 constraints, ReadFeed: 10/10 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 48/48 constraints, Known Traps: 29/29 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 16/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/42 variables, 4/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 13/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 48/90 variables, 42/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 10/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 48/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
[2024-05-24 14:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 1/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
[2024-05-24 14:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 1/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 0/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/90 variables, 0/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 90/90 variables, and 139 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved in 1073 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 42/42 constraints, ReadFeed: 10/10 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 48/48 constraints, Known Traps: 31/31 constraints]
After SMT, in 2563ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2564ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2644 ms. Remains : 42/42 places, 50/50 transitions.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p1)]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 54 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 227 ms :[p1, p1, p1, p1]
RANDOM walk for 33 steps (0 resets) in 5 ms. (5 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p1)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p1)]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 103 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 153 ms :[p1, p1, p1, p1]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 166 ms :[p1, p1, p1, p1]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 148 ms :[p1, p1, p1, p1]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25000 reset in 68 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25000 reset in 77 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [true, false, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 144 ms :[p1, p1, p1, p1]
Support contains 6 out of 42 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 42/42 places, 50/50 transitions.
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 42 transition count 54
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 42 transition count 54
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 42 transition count 54
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 4 rules in 12 ms. Remains 42 /42 variables (removed 0) and now considering 54/50 (removed -4) transitions.
[2024-05-24 14:36:13] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 52 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 14:36:13] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 50 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 50 rows 42 cols
[2024-05-24 14:36:13] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 14:36:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 12 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/42 variables, 4/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
[2024-05-24 14:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 14 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD22 is UNSAT
[2024-05-24 14:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD22 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD23 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD28 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD29 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD30 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD31 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD32 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD33 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 20/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 44 unsolved
[2024-05-24 14:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 6/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 50/92 variables, 42/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 12/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 44 unsolved
[2024-05-24 14:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 1/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 44 unsolved
[2024-05-24 14:36:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 14:36:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 14 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/92 variables, 3/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/92 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 44 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 92/92 variables, and 92 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 8 solved, 44 unsolved in 1789 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 42/42 constraints, ReadFeed: 12/12 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps: 30/30 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 8 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 13/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 6/42 variables, 4/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 17/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 50/92 variables, 42/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 12/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 44/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 44 unsolved
[2024-05-24 14:36:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 1/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/92 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 44 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 92/92 variables, and 137 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 8 solved, 44 unsolved in 845 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 42/42 constraints, ReadFeed: 12/12 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 44/52 constraints, Known Traps: 31/31 constraints]
After SMT, in 2646ms problems are : Problem set: 8 solved, 44 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 8 dead transitions in 2646ms
Found 8 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 8 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 8 transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 42/42 places, 46/50 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 147 edges and 42 vertex of which 38 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 4 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 4 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 8 ms. Remains 38 /42 variables (removed 4) and now considering 46/46 (removed 0) transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 38/42 places, 46/50 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 2672 ms. Remains : 38/42 places, 46/50 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin13237648566040468930
[2024-05-24 14:36:16] [INFO ] Built C files in 3ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin13237648566040468930
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin13237648566040468930;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 138 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin13237648566040468930;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 35 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin13237648566040468930;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased1788013222833164115.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 140 ms.
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-09 finished in 8036 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G((p0||F(!p1)))))'
Support contains 7 out of 44 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 44/44 places, 50/50 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 42 transition count 48
Applied a total of 4 rules in 2 ms. Remains 42 /44 variables (removed 2) and now considering 48/50 (removed 2) transitions.
[2024-05-24 14:36:16] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 46 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 46 rows 42 cols
[2024-05-24 14:36:16] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 14:36:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned [28, 29]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 35 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 40/44 places, 48/50 transitions.
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 40 transition count 46
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 38 transition count 46
Applied a total of 4 rules in 2 ms. Remains 38 /40 variables (removed 2) and now considering 46/48 (removed 2) transitions.
[2024-05-24 14:36:16] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 44 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 38 cols
[2024-05-24 14:36:16] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-24 14:36:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 14:36:16] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 44 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2024-05-24 14:36:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 14:36:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 10 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 14:36:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 49 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 78 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 38/44 places, 46/50 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 117 ms. Remains : 38/44 places, 46/50 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 68 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-10
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2097 reset in 100 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 14754 steps with 284 reset with depth 45 and stack size 32 in 15 ms.
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-10 finished in 312 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((F(p0)&&((X(p2)||p1) U X(p3))))'
Support contains 12 out of 44 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 44/44 places, 50/50 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 44 /44 variables (removed 0) and now considering 50/50 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-24 14:36:17] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 48 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 48 rows 44 cols
[2024-05-24 14:36:17] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-24 14:36:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned [30, 31]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 34 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 42/44 places, 50/50 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 42 /42 variables (removed 0) and now considering 50/50 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 35 ms. Remains : 42/44 places, 50/50 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 170 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p3)), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (NOT p3), true]
Running random walk in product with property : LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-12
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 24 steps with 1 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-12 finished in 225 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 6 out of 44 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 44/44 places, 50/50 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 42 transition count 48
Applied a total of 4 rules in 5 ms. Remains 42 /44 variables (removed 2) and now considering 48/50 (removed 2) transitions.
[2024-05-24 14:36:17] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 46 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 46 rows 42 cols
[2024-05-24 14:36:17] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-24 14:36:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned [28, 29]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 33 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 40/44 places, 48/50 transitions.
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 40 transition count 46
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 38 transition count 46
Applied a total of 4 rules in 3 ms. Remains 38 /40 variables (removed 2) and now considering 46/48 (removed 2) transitions.
[2024-05-24 14:36:17] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 44 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 38 cols
[2024-05-24 14:36:17] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-24 14:36:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 26 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 14:36:17] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 44 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2024-05-24 14:36:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 14:36:17] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 10 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 14:36:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 46 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 74 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 38/44 places, 46/50 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 115 ms. Remains : 38/44 places, 46/50 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 32 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-13
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 115 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 30 steps with 0 reset with depth 31 and stack size 31 in 0 ms.
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-13 finished in 271 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((!p0 U (G(!p0)||(X(F(p0))&&p1))))'
Support contains 7 out of 44 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 44/44 places, 50/50 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 44 /44 variables (removed 0) and now considering 50/50 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-24 14:36:17] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 48 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 48 rows 44 cols
[2024-05-24 14:36:17] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 14:36:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned [30, 31]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 42 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 42/44 places, 50/50 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 42 /42 variables (removed 0) and now considering 50/50 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 44 ms. Remains : 42/44 places, 50/50 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 270 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) p0), true, (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-14
Initial state of product has no viable successors after 0 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-14 finished in 335 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 44 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 44/44 places, 50/50 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 44 /44 variables (removed 0) and now considering 50/50 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-24 14:36:17] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 48 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2024-05-24 14:36:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 14:36:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned [30, 31]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 42 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 42/44 places, 50/50 transitions.
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 42 transition count 48
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 40 transition count 48
Applied a total of 4 rules in 3 ms. Remains 40 /42 variables (removed 2) and now considering 48/50 (removed 2) transitions.
[2024-05-24 14:36:17] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 46 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 46 rows 40 cols
[2024-05-24 14:36:17] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-24 14:36:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 29 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 14:36:17] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 46 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2024-05-24 14:36:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 14:36:17] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 10 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 14:36:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 46 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 76 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 40/44 places, 48/50 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 127 ms. Remains : 40/44 places, 48/50 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 72 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-15
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 6310 reset in 82 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 13 steps with 0 reset with depth 14 and stack size 14 in 0 ms.
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property LamportFastMutEx-COL-2-LTLFireability-15 finished in 298 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 27876 ms.
BK_STOP 1716561378202
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="LamportFastMutEx-COL-2"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is LamportFastMutEx-COL-2, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r224-tall-171649612300204"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/LamportFastMutEx-COL-2.tgz
mv LamportFastMutEx-COL-2 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;