About the Execution of 2023-gold for IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
461.783 | 25179.00 | 41226.00 | 909.00 | FFFFTTFTTFTTFFFF | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r219-smll-171649598200238.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool gold2023
Input is IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r219-smll-171649598200238
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 680K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 118K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.4K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 53K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.5K Apr 22 14:50 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K Apr 22 14:50 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.9K May 19 07:22 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K May 19 18:33 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K Apr 11 14:23 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 133K Apr 11 14:23 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 23K Apr 11 14:22 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 156K Apr 11 14:22 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.9K Apr 22 14:50 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.0K Apr 22 14:50 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13 May 18 16:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 iscolored
-rwxr-xr-x 1 mcc users 60K May 18 16:42 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1716716002016
bash -c /home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n "BK_STOP " ; date -u +%s%3N
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=gold2023
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLFireability PT
Running Version 202304061127
[2024-05-26 09:33:25] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-26 09:33:25] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-26 09:33:25] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 88 ms
[2024-05-26 09:33:25] [INFO ] Transformed 111 places.
[2024-05-26 09:33:25] [INFO ] Transformed 45 transitions.
[2024-05-26 09:33:25] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 111 places and 45 transitions and 224 arcs in 234 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 16 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 5 formulas.
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 47 out of 111 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 111/111 places, 45/45 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 18 places
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 89 transition count 45
Applied a total of 22 rules in 29 ms. Remains 89 /111 variables (removed 22) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 45 rows 89 cols
[2024-05-26 09:33:26] [INFO ] Computed 45 invariants in 16 ms
[2024-05-26 09:33:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 347 ms returned [12, 22, 26, 39]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 406 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 85/111 places, 45/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 85 /85 variables (removed 0) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 441 ms. Remains : 85/111 places, 45/45 transitions.
Support contains 47 out of 85 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-26 09:33:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 49 ms
[2024-05-26 09:33:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2024-05-26 09:33:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 45 transitions.
Support contains 46 out of 85 places (down from 47) after GAL structural reductions.
Finished random walk after 169 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 17 properties in 63 ms. (steps per millisecond=2 )
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G((G(!p0) U X(p1)))))'
Support contains 5 out of 85 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 85/85 places, 45/45 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 16 places
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 65 transition count 45
Applied a total of 20 rules in 8 ms. Remains 65 /85 variables (removed 20) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 45 rows 65 cols
[2024-05-26 09:33:27] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-26 09:33:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 114 ms returned [15]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 116 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 64/85 places, 45/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 64 /64 variables (removed 0) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 130 ms. Remains : 64/85 places, 45/45 transitions.
ANTLR Tool version 4.9.3 used for code generation does not match the current runtime version 4.7.2ANTLR Runtime version 4.9.3 used for parser compilation does not match the current runtime version 4.7.2ANTLR Tool version 4.9.3 used for code generation does not match the current runtime version 4.7.2ANTLR Runtime version 4.9.3 used for parser compilation does not match the current runtime version 4.7.2Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 517 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), true, p0]
Running random walk in product with property : IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-00 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 1}, { cond=p0, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=3 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=3 dest: 4}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=3 dest: 5}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=4 dest: 4}], [{ cond=p0, acceptance={} source=5 dest: 4}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=5 dest: 5}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(AND (GEQ s6 1) (GEQ s19 1) (GEQ s56 1)), p1:(AND (GEQ s29 1) (GEQ s41 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 160 steps with 0 reset in 9 ms.
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-00 finished in 781 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(G(p0))))'
Support contains 2 out of 85 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 85/85 places, 45/45 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 18 places
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 64 transition count 45
Applied a total of 21 rules in 8 ms. Remains 64 /85 variables (removed 21) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 45 rows 64 cols
[2024-05-26 09:33:28] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-26 09:33:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 120 ms returned [14]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 123 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/85 places, 45/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 63 /63 variables (removed 0) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 136 ms. Remains : 63/85 places, 45/45 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 161 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-01 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 0}, { cond=p0, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 1}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 1}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=3 dest: 2}]], initial=3, aps=[p0:(AND (GEQ s14 1) (GEQ s40 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, terminal, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 2 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-01 finished in 313 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((G(p0)||X(F((!p0&&F(!p1)))))))'
Support contains 4 out of 85 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 85/85 places, 45/45 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 16 places
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 65 transition count 45
Applied a total of 20 rules in 7 ms. Remains 65 /85 variables (removed 20) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 45 rows 65 cols
[2024-05-26 09:33:28] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-26 09:33:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 206 ms returned [15]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 208 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 64/85 places, 45/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 64 /64 variables (removed 0) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 220 ms. Remains : 64/85 places, 45/45 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 315 ms :[p1, (OR p0 p1), (AND p1 (NOT p0)), (AND p1 (NOT p0)), (AND p1 (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-04 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=p1, acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p0) p1), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 0}, { cond=p0, acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 1}, { cond=p0, acceptance={} source=3 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p0) p1), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 0}, { cond=p0, acceptance={} source=4 dest: 4}]], initial=2, aps=[p1:(AND (GEQ s6 1) (GEQ s19 1) (GEQ s56 1)), p0:(LT s52 1)], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1321 reset in 562 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1316 reset in 383 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) p0), (X p0), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge sufficient to adopt a stutter insensitive property.
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 137 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 8 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 11 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 282 ms :[p1, (AND p1 (NOT p0)), (AND p1 (NOT p0)), false, (AND p1 (NOT p0))]
Finished random walk after 367 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 4 properties in 54 ms. (steps per millisecond=6 )
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) p0), (X p0), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0)), (F p1), (F (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))), (F (AND p1 (NOT p0)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 408 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 11 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 5 states, 11 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 288 ms :[p1, (AND p1 (NOT p0)), (AND p1 (NOT p0)), false, (AND p1 (NOT p0))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 275 ms :[p1, (AND p1 (NOT p0)), (AND p1 (NOT p0)), false, (AND p1 (NOT p0))]
Support contains 4 out of 64 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 64/64 places, 45/45 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 64 transition count 37
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 12 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 12 transitions
Performed 12 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 12
Iterating post reduction 1 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 50 transition count 25
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 38 transition count 24
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 37 transition count 24
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 37 transition count 15
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 25 transition count 15
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 25 transition count 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 22 transition count 12
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 15 transition count 8
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 87 place count 14 transition count 8
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 87 place count 14 transition count 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 11 transition count 6
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 7 transition count 4
Applied a total of 98 rules in 25 ms. Remains 7 /64 variables (removed 57) and now considering 4/45 (removed 41) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 4 rows 7 cols
[2024-05-26 09:33:31] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-26 09:33:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 09:33:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 09:33:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 39 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 83 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-26 09:33:31] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 09:33:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 09:33:31] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 36 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 7/64 places, 4/45 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 158 ms. Remains : 7/64 places, 4/45 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) p0), (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 21 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 11 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-04 finished in 3183 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((!p0 U (p1||G(!p0))))'
Support contains 6 out of 85 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 85/85 places, 45/45 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 15 places
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Drop transitions removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 66 transition count 37
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 9 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 9 transitions
Performed 9 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 9
Iterating post reduction 1 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 52 transition count 28
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 43 transition count 27
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 42 transition count 27
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 42 transition count 19
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 30 transition count 19
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 30 transition count 18
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 29 transition count 18
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 29 transition count 15
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 26 transition count 15
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 17 transition count 9
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 16 transition count 9
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 7 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 16 transition count 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 14 transition count 8
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 14 transition count 7
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 8 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 12 transition count 7
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 9 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 12 transition count 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 9 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 11 transition count 6
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 9 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 10 transition count 5
Applied a total of 100 rules in 23 ms. Remains 10 /85 variables (removed 75) and now considering 5/45 (removed 40) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 5 rows 10 cols
[2024-05-26 09:33:31] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-26 09:33:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned [1]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 33 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 9/85 places, 5/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 9 /9 variables (removed 0) and now considering 5/5 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 57 ms. Remains : 9/85 places, 5/45 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 73 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p1) p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-05 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) p0), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 1}]], initial=1, aps=[p1:(AND (GEQ s0 1) (NOT (AND (GEQ s0 1) (GEQ s1 1) (GEQ s4 1) (GEQ s5 1) (GEQ s6 1) (GEQ s8 1)))), p0:(AND (GEQ s0 1) (GEQ s1 1) (GEQ s4 1) (GEQ s5 1) (GE...], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant, terminal, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null][true, true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 196 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 167 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0))), true, (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))))]
Property proved to be true thanks to conjunction of knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 127 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-05 finished in 641 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 85 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 85/85 places, 45/45 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 18 places
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 64 transition count 45
Applied a total of 21 rules in 6 ms. Remains 64 /85 variables (removed 21) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 45 rows 64 cols
[2024-05-26 09:33:32] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-26 09:33:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 128 ms returned [14]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 130 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/85 places, 45/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 63 /63 variables (removed 0) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 141 ms. Remains : 63/85 places, 45/45 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 123 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-06 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 0}, { cond=p0, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 2}]], initial=1, aps=[p0:(AND (GEQ s20 1) (GEQ s23 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, terminal, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null][false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-06 finished in 285 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 85 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 85/85 places, 45/45 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 18 places
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 63 transition count 45
Applied a total of 22 rules in 6 ms. Remains 63 /85 variables (removed 22) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 45 rows 63 cols
[2024-05-26 09:33:32] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-26 09:33:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 125 ms returned [14]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 128 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 62/85 places, 45/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 62 /62 variables (removed 0) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 139 ms. Remains : 62/85 places, 45/45 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 109 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-08 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(GEQ s58 1)], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null][false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 959 reset in 238 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 960 reset in 407 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge sufficient to adopt a stutter insensitive property.
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 113 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 49 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Finished random walk after 118 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=39 )
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 149 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 53 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 53 ms :[(NOT p0)]
// Phase 1: matrix 45 rows 62 cols
[2024-05-26 09:33:33] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-26 09:33:34] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 16 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2024-05-26 09:33:34] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 16 positive and 2 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2024-05-26 09:33:34] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2024-05-26 09:33:34] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 57 ms returned sat
[2024-05-26 09:33:34] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 44/45/44 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 10 ms.
[2024-05-26 09:33:34] [INFO ] Added : 32 causal constraints over 7 iterations in 144 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Support contains 1 out of 62 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 62/62 places, 45/45 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 9 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 9 transitions
Performed 9 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 9
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 62 transition count 36
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 12 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 12 transitions
Performed 12 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 12
Iterating post reduction 1 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 47 transition count 24
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 35 transition count 24
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 35 transition count 15
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 23 transition count 15
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 23 transition count 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 20 transition count 12
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 10 transition count 6
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 9 transition count 6
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 9 transition count 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 7 transition count 5
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 7 transition count 4
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 5 transition count 4
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 5 transition count 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 4 transition count 3
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 2 transition count 2
Applied a total of 103 rules in 26 ms. Remains 2 /62 variables (removed 60) and now considering 2/45 (removed 43) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 2 rows 2 cols
[2024-05-26 09:33:34] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-26 09:33:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 77 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 09:33:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 09:33:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 78 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 160 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-26 09:33:34] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 09:33:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 09:33:34] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 214 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 2/62 places, 2/45 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 427 ms. Remains : 2/62 places, 2/45 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0))]
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 17 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-08 finished in 2176 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(p0)&&F(G(p1)))))'
Support contains 8 out of 85 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 85/85 places, 45/45 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 15 places
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Drop transitions removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 67 transition count 37
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 1 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 54 transition count 27
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 44 transition count 27
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 44 transition count 18
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 32 transition count 18
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 32 transition count 16
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 30 transition count 16
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 21 transition count 10
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 18 transition count 8
Applied a total of 89 rules in 22 ms. Remains 18 /85 variables (removed 67) and now considering 8/45 (removed 37) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 8 rows 18 cols
[2024-05-26 09:33:34] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-26 09:33:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 09:33:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 09:33:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 76 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 122 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-26 09:33:34] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 09:33:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 09:33:34] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 46 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 18/85 places, 8/45 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 205 ms. Remains : 18/85 places, 8/45 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 157 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-09 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}, { cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}], [{ cond=p1, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 2}, { cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(OR (LT s2 1) (LT s14 1)), p1:(OR (LT s1 1) (LT s3 1) (LT s4 1) (LT s8 1) (LT s11 1) (LT s13 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null, null, null][true, true, true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 244 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 54 steps with 0 reset with depth 55 and stack size 55 in 1 ms.
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-09 finished in 632 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G(p0)||G(F(p1))))'
Support contains 3 out of 85 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 85/85 places, 45/45 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 18 places
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Drop transitions removed 7 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 7 transitions
Performed 7 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 7
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 64 transition count 38
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 9 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 9 transitions
Performed 9 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 9
Iterating post reduction 1 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 52 transition count 29
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 43 transition count 29
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 43 transition count 20
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 31 transition count 20
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 31 transition count 17
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 28 transition count 17
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 18 transition count 11
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 17 transition count 11
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 17 transition count 9
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 14 transition count 9
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 14 transition count 8
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 12 transition count 7
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 11 transition count 7
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 10 transition count 6
Applied a total of 96 rules in 29 ms. Remains 10 /85 variables (removed 75) and now considering 6/45 (removed 39) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 6 rows 10 cols
[2024-05-26 09:33:35] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-26 09:33:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 09:33:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 09:33:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 47 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 89 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-26 09:33:35] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 09:33:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 09:33:35] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 33 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 10/85 places, 6/45 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 164 ms. Remains : 10/85 places, 6/45 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 536 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-10 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=p0, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 1}, { cond=true, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 2}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(GEQ s0 1), p1:(AND (GEQ s5 1) (GEQ s7 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-invariant, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null][true, true, true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 5346 reset in 160 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 5321 reset in 347 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p0), true, (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 8 factoid took 151 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 167 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Finished random walk after 10 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 3 properties in 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=5 )
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p0), true, (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0)), (F p1), (F (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 8 factoid took 292 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 164 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 160 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Support contains 3 out of 10 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 10/10 places, 6/6 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 10 /10 variables (removed 0) and now considering 6/6 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 09:33:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 09:33:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 09:33:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 09:33:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 43 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 88 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-26 09:33:37] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 09:33:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 09:33:37] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 42 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 143 ms. Remains : 10/10 places, 6/6 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT p1)), (X p0), true, (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 8 factoid took 168 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 165 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Finished random walk after 9 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 3 properties in 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=3 )
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT p1)), (X p0), true, (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0)), (F p1), (F (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 8 factoid took 274 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 159 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 164 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 161 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 5391 reset in 185 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 5368 reset in 194 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin10530255233360107022
[2024-05-26 09:33:39] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 6 transitions.
[2024-05-26 09:33:39] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 2 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-26 09:33:39] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 6 transitions.
[2024-05-26 09:33:39] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-26 09:33:39] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 6 transitions.
[2024-05-26 09:33:39] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-26 09:33:39] [INFO ] Built C files in 9ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin10530255233360107022
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin10530255233360107022;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 370 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin10530255233360107022;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 63 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin10530255233360107022;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased17061750379373148601.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 127 ms.
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES PARTIAL_ORDER EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-10 finished in 4483 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F((p0&&X(F(p1))))))'
Support contains 8 out of 85 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 85/85 places, 45/45 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 13 places
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 68 transition count 45
Applied a total of 17 rules in 3 ms. Remains 68 /85 variables (removed 17) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 45 rows 68 cols
[2024-05-26 09:33:39] [INFO ] Computed 24 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-26 09:33:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 104 ms returned [18]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 105 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 67/85 places, 45/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 67 /67 variables (removed 0) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 111 ms. Remains : 67/85 places, 45/45 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 170 ms :[(NOT p1), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-11 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}], [{ cond=p0, acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}]], initial=1, aps=[p1:(GEQ s43 1), p0:(OR (GEQ s43 1) (AND (GEQ s5 1) (GEQ s12 1) (GEQ s13 1) (GEQ s14 1) (GEQ s17 1) (GEQ s22 1) (GEQ s40 1)))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null][false, false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2814 reset in 228 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2856 reset in 261 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 211 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 168 ms :[(NOT p1), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Finished random walk after 44 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 2 properties in 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=22 )
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p1), (F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 203 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 168 ms :[(NOT p1), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 160 ms :[(NOT p1), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
// Phase 1: matrix 45 rows 67 cols
[2024-05-26 09:33:41] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-26 09:33:41] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 16 positive place invariants in 11 ms returned sat
[2024-05-26 09:33:41] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 16 positive and 7 generalized place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2024-05-26 09:33:41] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2024-05-26 09:33:41] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 54 ms returned sat
[2024-05-26 09:33:41] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 44/50/44 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 9 ms.
[2024-05-26 09:33:41] [INFO ] Added : 11 causal constraints over 3 iterations in 56 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
[2024-05-26 09:33:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 09:33:41] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 16 positive place invariants in 10 ms returned sat
[2024-05-26 09:33:41] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 16 positive and 7 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2024-05-26 09:33:41] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2024-05-26 09:33:41] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 44 ms returned sat
[2024-05-26 09:33:41] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 44/50/44 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 8 ms.
[2024-05-26 09:33:41] [INFO ] Added : 11 causal constraints over 3 iterations in 55 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p1)
Support contains 8 out of 67 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 67/67 places, 45/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 67 /67 variables (removed 0) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-26 09:33:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 09:33:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 77 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 09:33:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 09:33:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 126 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 207 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-26 09:33:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 09:33:42] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 92 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 303 ms. Remains : 67/67 places, 45/45 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 122 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 168 ms :[(NOT p1), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Finished random walk after 35 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 2 properties in 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=17 )
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p1), (F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 193 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 138 ms :[(NOT p1), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 146 ms :[(NOT p1), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
[2024-05-26 09:33:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 09:33:43] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 16 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2024-05-26 09:33:43] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 16 positive and 7 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2024-05-26 09:33:43] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2024-05-26 09:33:43] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 48 ms returned sat
[2024-05-26 09:33:43] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 44/50/44 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 6 ms.
[2024-05-26 09:33:43] [INFO ] Added : 11 causal constraints over 3 iterations in 43 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
[2024-05-26 09:33:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 09:33:43] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 16 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2024-05-26 09:33:43] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 16 positive and 7 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2024-05-26 09:33:43] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2024-05-26 09:33:43] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 38 ms returned sat
[2024-05-26 09:33:43] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 44/50/44 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 8 ms.
[2024-05-26 09:33:43] [INFO ] Added : 11 causal constraints over 3 iterations in 42 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p1)
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 156 ms :[(NOT p1), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2827 reset in 143 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2853 reset in 168 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [true, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 156 ms :[(NOT p1), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Support contains 8 out of 67 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 67/67 places, 45/45 transitions.
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 67 transition count 45
Performed 14 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 1 with 14 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 67 transition count 45
Deduced a syphon composed of 21 places in 1 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 67 transition count 45
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 28 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 67 transition count 45
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 66 transition count 44
Deduced a syphon composed of 27 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 66 transition count 44
Deduced a syphon composed of 27 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 30 rules in 18 ms. Remains 66 /67 variables (removed 1) and now considering 44/45 (removed 1) transitions.
[2024-05-26 09:33:44] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 66 cols
[2024-05-26 09:33:44] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-26 09:33:44] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 74 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 66/67 places, 44/45 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 103 ms. Remains : 66/67 places, 44/45 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin14262692387265032866
[2024-05-26 09:33:44] [INFO ] Built C files in 5ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin14262692387265032866
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin14262692387265032866;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 249 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin14262692387265032866;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 29 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin14262692387265032866;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased15791370641112651449.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 257 ms.
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-11 finished in 5226 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((p0||F((X(G(p2))&&p1)))))'
Support contains 8 out of 85 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 85/85 places, 45/45 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 16 places
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Drop transitions removed 5 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 5 transitions
Performed 5 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 66 transition count 40
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 5 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 5 transitions
Performed 5 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 58 transition count 35
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 53 transition count 35
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 53 transition count 23
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 37 transition count 23
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 37 transition count 20
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 34 transition count 20
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 23 transition count 13
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 22 transition count 13
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 22 transition count 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 20 transition count 12
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 20 transition count 11
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 18 transition count 10
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 87 place count 17 transition count 10
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 14 transition count 8
Applied a total of 92 rules in 19 ms. Remains 14 /85 variables (removed 71) and now considering 8/45 (removed 37) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 8 rows 14 cols
[2024-05-26 09:33:45] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-26 09:33:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 09:33:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 09:33:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 36 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 72 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-26 09:33:45] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 09:33:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 09:33:45] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 27 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 14/85 places, 8/45 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 128 ms. Remains : 14/85 places, 8/45 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 166 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-12 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) p1), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}, { cond=p1, acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 1}, { cond=p2, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND p1 (NOT p2)), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(AND (GEQ s2 1) (GEQ s4 1) (GEQ s8 1) (GEQ s13 1)), p1:(AND (GEQ s6 1) (GEQ s9 1)), p2:(AND (GEQ s0 1) (GEQ s10 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, no-univ-branch, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null, null, null][true, true, true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 118 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 24 steps with 0 reset with depth 25 and stack size 25 in 0 ms.
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-12 finished in 440 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 4 out of 85 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 85/85 places, 45/45 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 15 places
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Drop transitions removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 66 transition count 37
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 11 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 11 transitions
Performed 11 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 11
Iterating post reduction 1 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 52 transition count 26
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 41 transition count 25
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 40 transition count 25
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 40 transition count 17
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 28 transition count 17
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 28 transition count 16
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 27 transition count 16
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 27 transition count 13
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 24 transition count 13
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 13 transition count 6
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 12 transition count 5
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 11 transition count 5
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 8 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 11 transition count 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 9 transition count 4
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 8 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 9 transition count 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 7 transition count 3
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 5 transition count 2
Applied a total of 108 rules in 18 ms. Remains 5 /85 variables (removed 80) and now considering 2/45 (removed 43) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 2 rows 5 cols
[2024-05-26 09:33:45] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-26 09:33:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 19 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 09:33:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 09:33:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 22 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 43 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-26 09:33:45] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
[2024-05-26 09:33:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-26 09:33:45] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 29 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 5/85 places, 2/45 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 107 ms. Remains : 5/85 places, 2/45 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 179 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-13 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=p0, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(OR (LT s1 1) (LT s2 1) (LT s3 1) (LT s4 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null][true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 128 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 2 steps with 0 reset with depth 3 and stack size 3 in 0 ms.
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-13 finished in 430 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 20433 ms.
BK_STOP 1716716027195
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202304061127.jar
+ VERSION=202304061127
+ echo 'Running Version 202304061127'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="gold2023"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool gold2023"
echo " Input is IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r219-smll-171649598200238"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02.tgz
mv IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;