fond
Model Checking Contest 2024
14th edition, Geneva, Switzerland, June 25, 2024
Execution of r202-smll-171649588100380
Last Updated
July 7, 2024

About the Execution of ITS-Tools for IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
573.271 35998.00 76034.00 447.60 FFFFTTFTTFTTFFFF normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r202-smll-171649588100380.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r202-smll-171649588100380
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 680K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 118K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.4K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 53K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.5K Apr 22 14:50 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K Apr 22 14:50 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.9K May 19 07:22 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K May 19 18:33 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K Apr 11 14:23 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 133K Apr 11 14:23 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 23K Apr 11 14:22 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 156K Apr 11 14:22 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.9K Apr 22 14:50 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.0K Apr 22 14:50 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13 May 18 16:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 iscolored
-rwxr-xr-x 1 mcc users 60K May 18 16:42 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716781965850

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-27 03:52:47] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-27 03:52:47] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-27 03:52:48] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 153 ms
[2024-05-27 03:52:48] [INFO ] Transformed 111 places.
[2024-05-27 03:52:48] [INFO ] Transformed 45 transitions.
[2024-05-27 03:52:48] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 111 places and 45 transitions and 224 arcs in 328 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 30 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 5 formulas.
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 47 out of 111 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 111/111 places, 45/45 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 18 places
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 89 transition count 45
Applied a total of 22 rules in 92 ms. Remains 89 /111 variables (removed 22) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 45 rows 89 cols
[2024-05-27 03:52:48] [INFO ] Computed 45 invariants in 14 ms
[2024-05-27 03:52:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 602 ms returned [12, 22, 26, 39]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 694 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 85/111 places, 45/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 85 /85 variables (removed 0) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 864 ms. Remains : 85/111 places, 45/45 transitions.
Support contains 47 out of 85 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-27 03:52:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 59 ms
[2024-05-27 03:52:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2024-05-27 03:52:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 45 transitions.
Support contains 46 out of 85 places (down from 47) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 1000 steps (0 resets) in 197 ms. (5 steps per ms) remains 0/17 properties
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G((G(!p0) U X(p1)))))'
Support contains 5 out of 85 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 85/85 places, 45/45 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 16 places
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 65 transition count 45
Applied a total of 20 rules in 5 ms. Remains 65 /85 variables (removed 20) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 45 rows 65 cols
[2024-05-27 03:52:50] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 5 ms
[2024-05-27 03:52:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 140 ms returned [15]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 142 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 64/85 places, 45/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 64 /64 variables (removed 0) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 150 ms. Remains : 64/85 places, 45/45 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 521 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), true, p0]
Running random walk in product with property : IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-00
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 169 steps with 0 reset in 5 ms.
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-00 finished in 786 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(G(p0))))'
Support contains 2 out of 85 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 85/85 places, 45/45 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 18 places
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 64 transition count 45
Applied a total of 21 rules in 5 ms. Remains 64 /85 variables (removed 21) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 45 rows 64 cols
[2024-05-27 03:52:51] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-27 03:52:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 117 ms returned [14]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 119 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/85 places, 45/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 63 /63 variables (removed 0) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 128 ms. Remains : 63/85 places, 45/45 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 137 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-01
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 2 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-01 finished in 284 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((G(p0)||X(F((!p0&&F(!p1)))))))'
Support contains 4 out of 85 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 85/85 places, 45/45 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 16 places
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 65 transition count 45
Applied a total of 20 rules in 5 ms. Remains 65 /85 variables (removed 20) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 45 rows 65 cols
[2024-05-27 03:52:51] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-27 03:52:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 84 ms returned [15]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 85 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 64/85 places, 45/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 64 /64 variables (removed 0) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 94 ms. Remains : 64/85 places, 45/45 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 239 ms :[p1, (OR p0 p1), (AND p1 (NOT p0)), (AND p1 (NOT p0)), (AND p1 (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-04
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1318 reset in 506 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1312 reset in 380 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) p0), (X p0), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 244 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 8 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 201 ms :[p1, (AND p1 (NOT p0)), (AND p1 (NOT p0)), (AND p1 (NOT p0))]
RANDOM walk for 772 steps (0 resets) in 31 ms. (24 steps per ms) remains 0/3 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) p0), (X p0), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p1)))), (F p1), (F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 176 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 184 ms :[p1, (AND p1 (NOT p0)), (AND p1 (NOT p0)), (AND p1 (NOT p0))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 185 ms :[p1, (AND p1 (NOT p0)), (AND p1 (NOT p0)), (AND p1 (NOT p0))]
Support contains 4 out of 64 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 64/64 places, 45/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 64 /64 variables (removed 0) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 45 rows 64 cols
[2024-05-27 03:52:53] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-27 03:52:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 131 ms returned []
[2024-05-27 03:52:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 03:52:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 127 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 262 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 44 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-27 03:52:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 2/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/64 variables, 2/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 2/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 45/109 variables, 64/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/109 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 109/109 variables, and 84 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved in 1440 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 16/16 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 44/44 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 2/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/64 variables, 2/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 2/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 45/109 variables, 64/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 44/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/109 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 109/109 variables, and 128 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved in 1118 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 16/16 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 44/44 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2612ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2628ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2897 ms. Remains : 64/64 places, 45/45 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) p0), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 88 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 144 ms :[p1, (AND p1 (NOT p0)), (AND p1 (NOT p0)), (AND p1 (NOT p0))]
RANDOM walk for 1289 steps (0 resets) in 19 ms. (64 steps per ms) remains 0/3 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) p0), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p1)))), (F p1), (F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 155 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 143 ms :[p1, (AND p1 (NOT p0)), (AND p1 (NOT p0)), (AND p1 (NOT p0))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 154 ms :[p1, (AND p1 (NOT p0)), (AND p1 (NOT p0)), (AND p1 (NOT p0))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 174 ms :[p1, (AND p1 (NOT p0)), (AND p1 (NOT p0)), (AND p1 (NOT p0))]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1315 reset in 209 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1315 reset in 266 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [true, true, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 176 ms :[p1, (AND p1 (NOT p0)), (AND p1 (NOT p0)), (AND p1 (NOT p0))]
Support contains 4 out of 64 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 64/64 places, 45/45 transitions.
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 64 transition count 45
Performed 15 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 1 with 15 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 64 transition count 45
Deduced a syphon composed of 24 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 64 transition count 45
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 28 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 64 transition count 45
Deduced a syphon composed of 28 places in 1 ms
Applied a total of 28 rules in 31 ms. Remains 64 /64 variables (removed 0) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-27 03:52:58] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 44 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 45 rows 64 cols
[2024-05-27 03:52:58] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 1 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 2/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
[2024-05-27 03:52:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 1 places in 43 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 03:52:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 1 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 03:52:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 1 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 03:52:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 1 places in 18 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 03:52:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 1 places in 21 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 03:52:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 1 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD6 is UNSAT
[2024-05-27 03:52:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 1 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
[2024-05-27 03:52:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 1 places in 23 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD8 is UNSAT
[2024-05-27 03:52:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 1 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD9 is UNSAT
[2024-05-27 03:52:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 1 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD10 is UNSAT
[2024-05-27 03:52:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 1 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD11 is UNSAT
[2024-05-27 03:52:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD0 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD2 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD4 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 12/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/64 variables, 4/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 33 unsolved
Problem TDEAD15 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD16 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD17 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD18 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD19 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD20 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD21 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD22 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD23 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD25 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD26 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD27 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD31 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD36 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD39 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD41 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD43 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 45/109 variables, 64/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 28 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 28 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/109 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 28 solved, 16 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 109/109 variables, and 96 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 28 solved, 16 unsolved in 1215 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 44/44 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 28 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 28 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 2/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 28 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 11/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 28 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 28 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 13/46 variables, 12/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 28 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 28 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 17/63 variables, 4/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 28 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 28 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/64 variables, 1/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 28 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 1/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 28 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 28 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 45/109 variables, 64/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 28 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 16/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 28 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 28 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/109 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 28 solved, 16 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 109/109 variables, and 112 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 28 solved, 16 unsolved in 411 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 16/44 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints]
After SMT, in 1672ms problems are : Problem set: 28 solved, 16 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 28 dead transitions in 1677ms
Found 28 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 28 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 28 transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 64/64 places, 17/45 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 74 edges and 64 vertex of which 36 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 28 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 28 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 24 transition count 17
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 1 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 24 transition count 17
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 24 transition count 17
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 19 transition count 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 19 transition count 12
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 19 transition count 12
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 18 transition count 11
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 18 transition count 11
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 25 rules in 24 ms. Remains 18 /64 variables (removed 46) and now considering 11/17 (removed 6) transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 18/64 places, 11/45 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 1743 ms. Remains : 18/64 places, 11/45 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin38664337118008642
[2024-05-27 03:53:00] [INFO ] Built C files in 14ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin38664337118008642
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin38664337118008642;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 559 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin38664337118008642;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 72 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin38664337118008642;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased5068257495700143813.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 3918 ms.
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-04 finished in 13355 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((!p0 U (p1||G(!p0))))'
Support contains 6 out of 85 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 85/85 places, 45/45 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 15 places
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 66 transition count 37
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 9 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 9 transitions
Performed 9 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 9
Iterating post reduction 1 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 52 transition count 28
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 43 transition count 27
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 42 transition count 27
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 42 transition count 19
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 30 transition count 19
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 30 transition count 18
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 29 transition count 18
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 29 transition count 15
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 26 transition count 15
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 17 transition count 9
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 16 transition count 9
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 7 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 16 transition count 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 14 transition count 8
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 14 transition count 7
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 8 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 12 transition count 7
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 9 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 12 transition count 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 9 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 11 transition count 6
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 9 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 10 transition count 5
Applied a total of 100 rules in 31 ms. Remains 10 /85 variables (removed 75) and now considering 5/45 (removed 40) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 5 rows 10 cols
[2024-05-27 03:53:04] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-27 03:53:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 23 ms returned [1]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 24 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 9/85 places, 5/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 9 /9 variables (removed 0) and now considering 5/5 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 56 ms. Remains : 9/85 places, 5/45 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 48 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p1) p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-05
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 81 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 86 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (X (NOT p0)), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
Property proved to be true thanks to conjunction of knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 98 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-05 finished in 385 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 85 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 85/85 places, 45/45 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 18 places
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 64 transition count 45
Applied a total of 21 rules in 3 ms. Remains 64 /85 variables (removed 21) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 45 rows 64 cols
[2024-05-27 03:53:05] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-27 03:53:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 77 ms returned [14]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 79 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/85 places, 45/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 63 /63 variables (removed 0) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 85 ms. Remains : 63/85 places, 45/45 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 115 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-06
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-06 finished in 213 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 85 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 85/85 places, 45/45 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 18 places
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 63 transition count 45
Applied a total of 22 rules in 3 ms. Remains 63 /85 variables (removed 22) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 45 rows 63 cols
[2024-05-27 03:53:05] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-27 03:53:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 133 ms returned [14]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 148 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 62/85 places, 45/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 62 /62 variables (removed 0) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 153 ms. Remains : 62/85 places, 45/45 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 124 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-08
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 954 reset in 232 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 963 reset in 322 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge sufficient to adopt a stutter insensitive property.
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 114 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 95 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 498 steps (0 resets) in 7 ms. (62 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 109 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 89 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 90 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
// Phase 1: matrix 45 rows 62 cols
[2024-05-27 03:53:06] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-27 03:53:06] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 16 positive place invariants in 11 ms returned sat
[2024-05-27 03:53:06] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 16 positive and 2 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2024-05-27 03:53:07] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 80 ms returned sat
[2024-05-27 03:53:07] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 44/45/44 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 13 ms.
[2024-05-27 03:53:07] [INFO ] Added : 32 causal constraints over 7 iterations in 193 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Support contains 1 out of 62 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 62/62 places, 45/45 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 9 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 9 transitions
Performed 9 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 9
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 62 transition count 36
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 12 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 12 transitions
Performed 12 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 12
Iterating post reduction 1 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 47 transition count 24
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 35 transition count 24
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 35 transition count 15
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 23 transition count 15
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 23 transition count 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 20 transition count 12
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 10 transition count 6
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 9 transition count 6
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 9 transition count 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 7 transition count 5
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 7 transition count 4
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 5 transition count 4
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 5 transition count 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 4 transition count 3
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 2 transition count 2
Applied a total of 103 rules in 20 ms. Remains 2 /62 variables (removed 60) and now considering 2/45 (removed 43) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 2 rows 2 cols
[2024-05-27 03:53:07] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-27 03:53:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
[2024-05-27 03:53:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 03:53:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 28 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 60 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-27 03:53:07] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 1 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-27 03:53:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/2 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/4 variables, 2/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/4 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 4/4 variables, and 3 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 32 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/2 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/4 variables, 2/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 1/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/4 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 4/4 variables, and 4 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 35 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 70ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 70ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 2/62 places, 2/45 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 157 ms. Remains : 2/62 places, 2/45 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0))]
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 21 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-08 finished in 1984 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(p0)&&F(G(p1)))))'
Support contains 8 out of 85 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 85/85 places, 45/45 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 15 places
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 67 transition count 37
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 1 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 54 transition count 27
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 44 transition count 27
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 44 transition count 18
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 32 transition count 18
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 32 transition count 16
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 30 transition count 16
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 15 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 21 transition count 10
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 18 transition count 8
Applied a total of 89 rules in 29 ms. Remains 18 /85 variables (removed 67) and now considering 8/45 (removed 37) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 8 rows 18 cols
[2024-05-27 03:53:07] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-27 03:53:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2024-05-27 03:53:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 03:53:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 47 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 89 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-27 03:53:07] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 7 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-27 03:53:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/18 variables, 5/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 8/26 variables, 18/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/26 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 26/26 variables, and 29 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved in 161 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 18/18 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/18 variables, 5/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 8/26 variables, 18/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 7/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/26 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 26/26 variables, and 36 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved in 134 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 18/18 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 302ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 303ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 18/85 places, 8/45 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 428 ms. Remains : 18/85 places, 8/45 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 124 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-09
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 291 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 20 steps with 0 reset with depth 21 and stack size 21 in 0 ms.
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-09 finished in 865 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G(p0)||G(F(p1))))'
Support contains 3 out of 85 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 85/85 places, 45/45 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 18 places
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 7 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 7 transitions
Performed 7 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 7
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 64 transition count 38
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 9 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 9 transitions
Performed 9 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 9
Iterating post reduction 1 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 52 transition count 29
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 43 transition count 29
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 43 transition count 20
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 7 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 31 transition count 20
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 31 transition count 17
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 28 transition count 17
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 18 transition count 11
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 17 transition count 11
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 17 transition count 9
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 14 transition count 9
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 14 transition count 8
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 12 transition count 7
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 11 transition count 7
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 10 transition count 6
Applied a total of 96 rules in 21 ms. Remains 10 /85 variables (removed 75) and now considering 6/45 (removed 39) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 6 rows 10 cols
[2024-05-27 03:53:08] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-27 03:53:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2024-05-27 03:53:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 03:53:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 29 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 71 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-27 03:53:08] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 5 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-27 03:53:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 1/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/10 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 6/16 variables, 10/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/16 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 16/16 variables, and 15 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 74 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 10/10 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 1/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/10 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 6/16 variables, 10/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 5/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/16 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 16/16 variables, and 20 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 69 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 10/10 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 149ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 149ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 10/85 places, 6/45 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 247 ms. Remains : 10/85 places, 6/45 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 195 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-10
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 5354 reset in 96 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 5296 reset in 546 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p0), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 125 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 127 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
RANDOM walk for 38 steps (0 resets) in 6 ms. (5 steps per ms) remains 0/3 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p0), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT (OR p0 p1))), (F p1), (F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 235 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 116 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 125 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Support contains 3 out of 10 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 10/10 places, 6/6 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 10 /10 variables (removed 0) and now considering 6/6 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-27 03:53:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 03:53:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2024-05-27 03:53:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 03:53:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 43 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 81 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-27 03:53:10] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 5 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-27 03:53:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 1/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/10 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 6/16 variables, 10/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/16 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 16/16 variables, and 15 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 91 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 10/10 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 1/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/10 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 6/16 variables, 10/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 5/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/16 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 16/16 variables, and 20 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 87 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 10/10 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 182ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 184ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 273 ms. Remains : 10/10 places, 6/6 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p0), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 94 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 127 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
RANDOM walk for 40 steps (0 resets) in 5 ms. (6 steps per ms) remains 0/3 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p0), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT (OR p0 p1))), (F p1), (F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 214 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 144 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 128 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 144 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 5425 reset in 146 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 5336 reset in 171 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin16178643358956610493
[2024-05-27 03:53:11] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 6 transitions.
[2024-05-27 03:53:11] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-27 03:53:11] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 6 transitions.
[2024-05-27 03:53:11] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-27 03:53:11] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 6 transitions.
[2024-05-27 03:53:11] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-27 03:53:11] [INFO ] Built C files in 11ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin16178643358956610493
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin16178643358956610493;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 116 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin16178643358956610493;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 36 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin16178643358956610493;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased10869603149508049400.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 254 ms.
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES PARTIAL_ORDER EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-10 finished in 3782 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F((p0&&X(F(p1))))))'
Support contains 8 out of 85 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 85/85 places, 45/45 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 13 places
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 68 transition count 45
Applied a total of 17 rules in 2 ms. Remains 68 /85 variables (removed 17) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 45 rows 68 cols
[2024-05-27 03:53:12] [INFO ] Computed 24 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-27 03:53:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 65 ms returned [18]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 66 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 67/85 places, 45/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 67 /67 variables (removed 0) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 69 ms. Remains : 67/85 places, 45/45 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 161 ms :[(NOT p1), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-11
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2828 reset in 132 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2833 reset in 147 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 169 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 137 ms :[(NOT p1), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
RANDOM walk for 163 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (32 steps per ms) remains 0/2 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p1), (F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 179 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 142 ms :[(NOT p1), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 140 ms :[(NOT p1), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
// Phase 1: matrix 45 rows 67 cols
[2024-05-27 03:53:13] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-27 03:53:13] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 16 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2024-05-27 03:53:13] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 16 positive and 7 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2024-05-27 03:53:13] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 29 ms returned sat
[2024-05-27 03:53:13] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 44/50/44 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 4 ms.
[2024-05-27 03:53:13] [INFO ] Added : 11 causal constraints over 3 iterations in 56 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
[2024-05-27 03:53:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 03:53:13] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 16 positive place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2024-05-27 03:53:13] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 16 positive and 7 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2024-05-27 03:53:13] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 71 ms returned sat
[2024-05-27 03:53:13] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 44/50/44 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 4 ms.
[2024-05-27 03:53:13] [INFO ] Added : 11 causal constraints over 3 iterations in 33 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p1)
Support contains 8 out of 67 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 67/67 places, 45/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 67 /67 variables (removed 0) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-27 03:53:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 03:53:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned []
[2024-05-27 03:53:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 03:53:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 108 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 181 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 44 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-27 03:53:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 7/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/67 variables, 1/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 45/112 variables, 67/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/112 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 112/112 variables, and 90 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved in 1153 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 16/16 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 67/67 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 44/44 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 7/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/67 variables, 1/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 45/112 variables, 67/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 44/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/112 variables, 0/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 112/112 variables, and 134 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved in 1055 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 16/16 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 67/67 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 44/44 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2227ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2230ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2412 ms. Remains : 67/67 places, 45/45 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 115 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 144 ms :[(NOT p1), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
RANDOM walk for 153 steps (0 resets) in 5 ms. (25 steps per ms) remains 0/2 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p1), (F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 169 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 136 ms :[(NOT p1), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 150 ms :[(NOT p1), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
[2024-05-27 03:53:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 03:53:16] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 16 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2024-05-27 03:53:17] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 16 positive and 7 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2024-05-27 03:53:17] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 62 ms returned sat
[2024-05-27 03:53:17] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 44/50/44 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 5 ms.
[2024-05-27 03:53:17] [INFO ] Added : 11 causal constraints over 3 iterations in 45 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
[2024-05-27 03:53:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 03:53:17] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 16 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2024-05-27 03:53:17] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 16 positive and 7 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2024-05-27 03:53:17] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 36 ms returned sat
[2024-05-27 03:53:17] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 44/50/44 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 5 ms.
[2024-05-27 03:53:17] [INFO ] Added : 11 causal constraints over 3 iterations in 41 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p1)
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 141 ms :[(NOT p1), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2835 reset in 128 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2841 reset in 270 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [true, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 158 ms :[(NOT p1), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Support contains 8 out of 67 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 67/67 places, 45/45 transitions.
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 67 transition count 45
Performed 14 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 1 with 14 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 67 transition count 45
Deduced a syphon composed of 21 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 67 transition count 45
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 28 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 67 transition count 45
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 66 transition count 44
Deduced a syphon composed of 27 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 66 transition count 44
Deduced a syphon composed of 27 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 30 rules in 11 ms. Remains 66 /67 variables (removed 1) and now considering 44/45 (removed 1) transitions.
[2024-05-27 03:53:18] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 43 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 66 cols
[2024-05-27 03:53:18] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 2 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 7/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
[2024-05-27 03:53:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 1 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD1 is UNSAT
[2024-05-27 03:53:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 1 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 03:53:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 1 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 03:53:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 1 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD4 is UNSAT
[2024-05-27 03:53:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 1 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
[2024-05-27 03:53:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 1 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
[2024-05-27 03:53:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 1 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD10 is UNSAT
[2024-05-27 03:53:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 1 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD11 is UNSAT
[2024-05-27 03:53:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 1 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 03:53:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 1 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD39 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD2 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD9 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 10/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 10 solved, 33 unsolved
[2024-05-27 03:53:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 1 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-27 03:53:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD8 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 2/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/66 variables, 1/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 32 unsolved
Problem TDEAD15 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD16 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD17 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD19 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD20 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD21 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD22 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD23 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD24 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD25 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD26 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD29 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD33 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD36 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD40 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD42 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 44/110 variables, 66/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 27 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 27 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/110 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 27 solved, 16 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 110/110 variables, and 101 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 27 solved, 16 unsolved in 1304 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 16/16 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 66/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 27 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 27 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 5/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 27 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 11/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 27 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 27 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 29/65 variables, 14/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 27 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 2/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 27 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 27 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/66 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 27 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 1/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 27 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 27 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 44/110 variables, 66/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 27 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 16/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 27 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 27 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/110 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 27 solved, 16 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 110/110 variables, and 117 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 27 solved, 16 unsolved in 614 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 16/16 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 66/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 16/43 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints]
After SMT, in 1933ms problems are : Problem set: 27 solved, 16 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 27 dead transitions in 1935ms
Found 27 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 27 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 27 transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 66/67 places, 17/45 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 80 edges and 66 vertex of which 39 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 27 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 27 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 27 transition count 17
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 1 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 27 transition count 17
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 27 transition count 17
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 27 transition count 17
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 26 transition count 16
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 26 transition count 16
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 13 rules in 8 ms. Remains 26 /66 variables (removed 40) and now considering 16/17 (removed 1) transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 26/67 places, 16/45 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 1962 ms. Remains : 26/67 places, 16/45 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin11132957335444139745
[2024-05-27 03:53:20] [INFO ] Built C files in 2ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin11132957335444139745
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin11132957335444139745;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 204 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin11132957335444139745;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 47 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin11132957335444139745;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased10797086238491343364.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 272 ms.
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-11 finished in 8622 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((p0||F((X(G(p2))&&p1)))))'
Support contains 8 out of 85 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 85/85 places, 45/45 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 16 places
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 5 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 5 transitions
Performed 5 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 66 transition count 40
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 5 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 5 transitions
Performed 5 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 58 transition count 35
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 53 transition count 35
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 53 transition count 23
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 37 transition count 23
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 37 transition count 20
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 34 transition count 20
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 23 transition count 13
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 22 transition count 13
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 22 transition count 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 20 transition count 12
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 20 transition count 11
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 18 transition count 10
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 87 place count 17 transition count 10
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 14 transition count 8
Applied a total of 92 rules in 8 ms. Remains 14 /85 variables (removed 71) and now considering 8/45 (removed 37) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 8 rows 14 cols
[2024-05-27 03:53:20] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-27 03:53:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2024-05-27 03:53:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 03:53:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 31 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 78 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-27 03:53:20] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 7 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-27 03:53:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 2/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/14 variables, 2/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 8/22 variables, 14/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/22 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 22/22 variables, and 21 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved in 86 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 14/14 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 2/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/14 variables, 2/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 8/22 variables, 14/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 7/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/22 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 22/22 variables, and 28 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved in 135 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 14/14 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 225ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 227ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 14/85 places, 8/45 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 321 ms. Remains : 14/85 places, 8/45 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 152 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-12
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 199 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 37 steps with 0 reset with depth 38 and stack size 38 in 0 ms.
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-12 finished in 707 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 4 out of 85 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 85/85 places, 45/45 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 15 places
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 66 transition count 37
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 11 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 11 transitions
Performed 11 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 11
Iterating post reduction 1 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 52 transition count 26
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 41 transition count 25
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 40 transition count 25
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 40 transition count 17
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 28 transition count 17
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 28 transition count 16
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 27 transition count 16
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 27 transition count 13
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 24 transition count 13
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 13 transition count 6
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 12 transition count 5
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 11 transition count 5
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 8 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 11 transition count 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 9 transition count 4
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 8 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 9 transition count 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 7 transition count 3
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 5 transition count 2
Applied a total of 108 rules in 22 ms. Remains 5 /85 variables (removed 80) and now considering 2/45 (removed 43) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 2 rows 5 cols
[2024-05-27 03:53:21] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-27 03:53:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 25 ms returned []
[2024-05-27 03:53:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 03:53:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 26 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 53 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-27 03:53:21] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 1 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-27 03:53:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/5 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/7 variables, 5/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/7 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 7/7 variables, and 9 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 26 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 5/5 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/5 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/7 variables, 5/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/7 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 7/7 variables, and 10 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 44 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 5/5 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 75ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 75ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 5/85 places, 2/45 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 158 ms. Remains : 5/85 places, 2/45 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 34 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-13
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 151 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 1 steps with 0 reset with depth 2 and stack size 2 in 0 ms.
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02-LTLFireability-13 finished in 363 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 33887 ms.

BK_STOP 1716782001848

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r202-smll-171649588100380"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02.tgz
mv IOTPpurchase-PT-C05M04P03D02 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;