fond
Model Checking Contest 2024
14th edition, Geneva, Switzerland, June 25, 2024
Execution of r202-smll-171649588000364
Last Updated
July 7, 2024

About the Execution of ITS-Tools for IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
435.132 21522.00 38103.00 347.00 TFFFTTTFFFFFTFTT normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r202-smll-171649588000364.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r202-smll-171649588000364
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 456K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.3K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 78K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 48K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.1K Apr 22 14:50 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K Apr 22 14:50 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.2K Apr 22 14:50 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Apr 22 14:50 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Apr 11 14:20 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 88K Apr 11 14:20 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.9K Apr 11 14:20 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 44K Apr 11 14:20 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.9K Apr 22 14:50 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K Apr 22 14:50 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13 May 18 16:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 iscolored
-rwxr-xr-x 1 mcc users 63K May 18 16:42 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716781582042

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-27 03:46:24] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-27 03:46:24] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-27 03:46:24] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 137 ms
[2024-05-27 03:46:24] [INFO ] Transformed 111 places.
[2024-05-27 03:46:24] [INFO ] Transformed 45 transitions.
[2024-05-27 03:46:24] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-27 03:46:24] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 111 places and 45 transitions and 224 arcs in 359 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 23 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 4 formulas.
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 51 out of 111 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 111/111 places, 45/45 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 25 places
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 5 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 81 transition count 45
Applied a total of 30 rules in 50 ms. Remains 81 /111 variables (removed 30) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 45 rows 81 cols
[2024-05-27 03:46:25] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 20 ms
[2024-05-27 03:46:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 429 ms returned [14, 31, 38, 44, 45, 48, 50]
[2024-05-27 03:46:25] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [31, 14, 38, 44, 45, 48]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 504 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 75/111 places, 45/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 75 /75 variables (removed 0) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 595 ms. Remains : 75/111 places, 45/45 transitions.
Support contains 51 out of 75 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-27 03:46:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 64 ms
[2024-05-27 03:46:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2024-05-27 03:46:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 45 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 31 to 27
RANDOM walk for 170 steps (0 resets) in 80 ms. (2 steps per ms) remains 0/27 properties
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((p0&&X(F(p1))&&F((!p2 U (p3||G(!p2)))))))'
Support contains 7 out of 75 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 75/75 places, 45/45 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 places
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 64 transition count 45
Applied a total of 11 rules in 8 ms. Remains 64 /75 variables (removed 11) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 45 rows 64 cols
[2024-05-27 03:46:26] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-27 03:46:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 162 ms returned [10, 17, 18, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 35]
[2024-05-27 03:46:26] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [10, 17, 18, 28, 30, 31, 33, 35]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 165 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 56/75 places, 45/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 56 /56 variables (removed 0) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 178 ms. Remains : 56/75 places, 45/45 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 551 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (AND p2 (NOT p3))), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (AND p2 (NOT p3))), true, (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p3) p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-00
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 714 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 183 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p3 p1 (NOT p2)), (X p0), (X p3), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p3)))), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X p3)), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p2)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 20 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 8 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-00 finished in 1793 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 75 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 75/75 places, 45/45 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 11 places
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 15 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 15 transitions
Performed 15 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 15
Iterating post reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 61 transition count 30
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 1 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 44 transition count 26
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 40 transition count 26
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 40 transition count 17
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 3 places
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 25 transition count 17
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 25 transition count 16
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 24 transition count 16
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 24 transition count 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 20 transition count 12
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 19 transition count 12
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 19 transition count 11
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 18 transition count 11
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 10 transition count 5
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 8 transition count 4
Applied a total of 97 rules in 34 ms. Remains 8 /75 variables (removed 67) and now considering 4/45 (removed 41) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 4 rows 8 cols
[2024-05-27 03:46:28] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-27 03:46:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned [2, 4, 5]
[2024-05-27 03:46:28] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [2, 5]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 35 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 6/75 places, 4/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 6 /6 variables (removed 0) and now considering 4/4 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 70 ms. Remains : 6/75 places, 4/45 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 35 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-01
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 432 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 3 steps with 0 reset with depth 4 and stack size 4 in 1 ms.
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-01 finished in 562 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((G(p0)||G(p1))))'
Support contains 7 out of 75 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 75/75 places, 45/45 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 places
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 13 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 13 transitions
Performed 13 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 13
Iterating post reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 64 transition count 32
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 1 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 49 transition count 29
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 46 transition count 28
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 45 transition count 28
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 45 transition count 20
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 33 transition count 20
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 33 transition count 19
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 32 transition count 19
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 32 transition count 17
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 30 transition count 17
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 21 transition count 11
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 20 transition count 11
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 7 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 20 transition count 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 19 transition count 10
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 15 transition count 8
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 14 transition count 8
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 11 transition count 6
Applied a total of 95 rules in 28 ms. Remains 11 /75 variables (removed 64) and now considering 6/45 (removed 39) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 6 rows 11 cols
[2024-05-27 03:46:29] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-27 03:46:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2024-05-27 03:46:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 03:46:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 35 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 78 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-27 03:46:29] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 5 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-27 03:46:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/11 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 1/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 6/17 variables, 11/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/17 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 17/17 variables, and 28 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 137 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 11/11 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 11/11 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/11 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 1/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 6/17 variables, 11/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 5/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/17 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 17/17 variables, and 33 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 125 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 11/11 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 11/11 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 289ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 297ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 11/75 places, 6/45 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 411 ms. Remains : 11/75 places, 6/45 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 37 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-02
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 162 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 5 steps with 0 reset with depth 6 and stack size 6 in 0 ms.
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-02 finished in 730 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((p0||X(p1))))'
Support contains 4 out of 75 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 75/75 places, 45/45 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 11 places
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 2 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 62 transition count 45
Applied a total of 13 rules in 7 ms. Remains 62 /75 variables (removed 13) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 45 rows 62 cols
[2024-05-27 03:46:29] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-27 03:46:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 153 ms returned [9, 12, 15, 16, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33]
[2024-05-27 03:46:29] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [9, 12, 15, 16, 26, 28, 29, 31, 33]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 155 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 53/75 places, 45/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 53 /53 variables (removed 0) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 167 ms. Remains : 53/75 places, 45/45 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 108 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-06
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 16666 reset in 137 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 16666 reset in 178 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge sufficient to adopt a stutter insensitive property.
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 149 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 2 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 11 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 257 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 939 ms. (42 steps per ms) remains 1/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (8 resets) in 243 ms. (163 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 45 rows 53 cols
[2024-05-27 03:46:31] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 43/47 variables, 5/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 43/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 5/52 variables, 3/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 5/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 45/98 variables, 53/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/98 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 98/98 variables, and 115 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 161 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 53/53 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem apf1 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 47/98 variables, and 9 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 60 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 4/53 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 0/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/53 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 233ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Found 1 invariant AP formulas.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (G (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p1))), (F p1), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p1))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 8 factoid took 359 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 11 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 5 states, 11 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 260 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 256 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
[2024-05-27 03:46:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 03:46:32] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2024-05-27 03:46:32] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 10 ms returned sat
[2024-05-27 03:46:32] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 61 ms returned sat
[2024-05-27 03:46:32] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 44/46/44 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 10 ms.
[2024-05-27 03:46:32] [INFO ] Added : 43 causal constraints over 9 iterations in 171 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))
Support contains 4 out of 53 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 53/53 places, 45/45 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 24 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 24 transitions
Performed 24 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 24
Iterating post reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 53 transition count 21
Reduce places removed 24 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 29 transition count 20
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 28 transition count 20
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 28 transition count 15
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 22 transition count 15
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 22 transition count 14
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 21 transition count 14
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 12 transition count 8
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 12 transition count 7
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 11 transition count 6
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 10 transition count 6
Applied a total of 82 rules in 9 ms. Remains 10 /53 variables (removed 43) and now considering 6/45 (removed 39) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 6 rows 10 cols
[2024-05-27 03:46:32] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-27 03:46:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned [4, 8]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 44 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 8/53 places, 6/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 8 /8 variables (removed 0) and now considering 6/6 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 55 ms. Remains : 8/53 places, 6/45 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (X (NOT (AND p0 p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 13 factoid took 25 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 11 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-06 finished in 2988 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((p0 U X(p1))&&X(F(p2))&&F(p3)))'
Support contains 3 out of 75 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 75/75 places, 45/45 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 11 places
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 61 transition count 45
Applied a total of 14 rules in 8 ms. Remains 61 /75 variables (removed 14) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 45 rows 61 cols
[2024-05-27 03:46:32] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-27 03:46:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 111 ms returned [9, 12, 15, 16, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32]
[2024-05-27 03:46:32] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [9, 12, 15, 16, 25, 27, 28, 30, 32]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 116 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 52/75 places, 45/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 52 /52 variables (removed 0) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 128 ms. Remains : 52/75 places, 45/45 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 308 ms :[(OR (NOT p3) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p1), (NOT p2), (NOT p3), (NOT p1), true]
Running random walk in product with property : IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-07
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-07 finished in 469 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((p0 U X(G((G(p1) U p2))))))'
Support contains 6 out of 75 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 75/75 places, 45/45 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 11 places
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 61 transition count 45
Applied a total of 14 rules in 5 ms. Remains 61 /75 variables (removed 14) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-27 03:46:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 03:46:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 137 ms returned [9, 12, 15, 16, 25, 26, 27, 29, 30, 31, 32]
[2024-05-27 03:46:33] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [9, 12, 15, 16, 25, 27, 30, 32]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 139 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 53/75 places, 45/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 53 /53 variables (removed 0) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 148 ms. Remains : 53/75 places, 45/45 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 488 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), true, (NOT p1), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-08
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 26 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-08 finished in 669 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((X((G((G(!p0)||X(p1)))&&F(p2))) U p3))'
Support contains 8 out of 75 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 75/75 places, 45/45 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 places
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 64 transition count 45
Applied a total of 11 rules in 4 ms. Remains 64 /75 variables (removed 11) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 45 rows 64 cols
[2024-05-27 03:46:33] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-27 03:46:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 138 ms returned [9, 12, 16, 17, 28, 29, 31, 32, 34, 35]
[2024-05-27 03:46:33] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [9, 12, 16, 17, 28, 31, 35]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 146 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 57/75 places, 45/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 57 /57 variables (removed 0) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 155 ms. Remains : 57/75 places, 45/45 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 589 ms :[(NOT p3), (OR (NOT p3) (NOT p2) (AND p0 (NOT p1))), (NOT p1), (AND p0 (NOT p1)), (NOT p2), (AND p0 (NOT p1)), true, p0]
Running random walk in product with property : IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-10
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 24 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-10 finished in 780 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((F(!p0) U (!p1&&X(p2))))'
Support contains 6 out of 75 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 75/75 places, 45/45 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 9 places
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 63 transition count 45
Applied a total of 12 rules in 6 ms. Remains 63 /75 variables (removed 12) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 45 rows 63 cols
[2024-05-27 03:46:34] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 5 ms
[2024-05-27 03:46:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 135 ms returned [10, 13, 16, 17, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34]
[2024-05-27 03:46:34] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [10, 13, 16, 17, 27, 29, 30, 32, 34]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 137 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 54/75 places, 45/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 147 ms. Remains : 54/75 places, 45/45 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 228 ms :[(OR (NOT p2) p1), p0, (NOT p2), (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-12
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 243 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 252 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) p2), (X p2), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND p1 p0 (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0 (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND p1 p0))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 p0 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to conjunction of knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 19 factoid took 161 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 10 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-12 finished in 1057 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((X(p0)&&(!p1 U (G(!p1)||(!p1&&G(!p2))))) U X(p1)))'
Support contains 6 out of 75 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 75/75 places, 45/45 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 9 places
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 2 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 64 transition count 45
Applied a total of 11 rules in 3 ms. Remains 64 /75 variables (removed 11) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 45 rows 64 cols
[2024-05-27 03:46:35] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-27 03:46:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 80 ms returned [10, 13, 16, 17, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34]
[2024-05-27 03:46:35] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [10, 13, 16, 17, 27, 29, 30, 32, 34]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 82 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 55/75 places, 45/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 55 /55 variables (removed 0) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 88 ms. Remains : 55/75 places, 45/45 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 243 ms :[p2, (OR (NOT p1) p2), true, (NOT p1), true, (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-13
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 43 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-13 finished in 351 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X((G(F(p0))&&(X(p2)||p1)))))'
Support contains 4 out of 75 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 75/75 places, 45/45 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 11 places
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 2 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 62 transition count 45
Applied a total of 13 rules in 9 ms. Remains 62 /75 variables (removed 13) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 45 rows 62 cols
[2024-05-27 03:46:36] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-27 03:46:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 72 ms returned [9, 12, 15, 16, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32]
[2024-05-27 03:46:36] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [9, 12, 15, 16, 25, 27, 28, 30, 32]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 74 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 53/75 places, 45/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 53 /53 variables (removed 0) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 84 ms. Remains : 53/75 places, 45/45 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 339 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p2), true]
Running random walk in product with property : IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-14
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 5263 reset in 115 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 5263 reset in 526 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p1 p2), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge sufficient to adopt a stutter insensitive property.
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 90 ms. Reduced automaton from 7 states, 10 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 67 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 72 steps (0 resets) in 5 ms. (12 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p1 p2), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 99 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 66 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 66 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
// Phase 1: matrix 45 rows 53 cols
[2024-05-27 03:46:37] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-27 03:46:37] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 7 positive place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2024-05-27 03:46:37] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 7 positive and 2 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2024-05-27 03:46:37] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 28 ms returned sat
[2024-05-27 03:46:37] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 44/46/44 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 5 ms.
[2024-05-27 03:46:37] [INFO ] Added : 16 causal constraints over 4 iterations in 49 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Support contains 2 out of 53 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 53/53 places, 45/45 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 23 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 23 transitions
Performed 23 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 23
Iterating post reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 53 transition count 22
Reduce places removed 23 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 30 transition count 21
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 29 transition count 21
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 29 transition count 15
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 22 transition count 15
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 22 transition count 14
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 21 transition count 14
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 13 transition count 9
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 9 transition count 6
Applied a total of 83 rules in 21 ms. Remains 9 /53 variables (removed 44) and now considering 6/45 (removed 39) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 6 rows 9 cols
[2024-05-27 03:46:37] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-27 03:46:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned [5]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 34 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 8/53 places, 6/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 8 /8 variables (removed 0) and now considering 6/6 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 56 ms. Remains : 8/53 places, 6/45 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 107 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 95 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 8 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (1 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 141 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 97 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 106 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
// Phase 1: matrix 6 rows 8 cols
[2024-05-27 03:46:38] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-27 03:46:38] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2024-05-27 03:46:38] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 6 ms returned sat
[2024-05-27 03:46:38] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 5/6/5 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 2 ms.
[2024-05-27 03:46:38] [INFO ] Added : 0 causal constraints over 0 iterations in 5 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 99 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 22276 reset in 176 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 22245 reset in 345 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin18095518976678285695
[2024-05-27 03:46:38] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 6 transitions.
[2024-05-27 03:46:39] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-27 03:46:39] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 6 transitions.
[2024-05-27 03:46:39] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 2 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-27 03:46:39] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 6 transitions.
[2024-05-27 03:46:39] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-27 03:46:39] [INFO ] Built C files in 49ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin18095518976678285695
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin18095518976678285695;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 545 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin18095518976678285695;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 78 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin18095518976678285695;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased10091516985951477230.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 135 ms.
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES PARTIAL_ORDER EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-14 finished in 3828 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G((p0||X(F((p0&&F(p1))))))))'
Support contains 4 out of 75 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 75/75 places, 45/45 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 11 places
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 14 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 14 transitions
Performed 14 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 14
Iterating post reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 61 transition count 31
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 46 transition count 30
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 45 transition count 29
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 44 transition count 29
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 44 transition count 19
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 28 transition count 19
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 28 transition count 18
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 27 transition count 18
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 27 transition count 15
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 24 transition count 15
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 23 transition count 15
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 15 transition count 9
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 13 transition count 8
Applied a total of 88 rules in 11 ms. Remains 13 /75 variables (removed 62) and now considering 8/45 (removed 37) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 8 rows 13 cols
[2024-05-27 03:46:39] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-27 03:46:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned [4, 7]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 42 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 11/75 places, 8/45 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 11 transition count 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 10 transition count 7
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 9 transition count 7
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 8 transition count 6
Applied a total of 5 rules in 2 ms. Remains 8 /11 variables (removed 3) and now considering 6/8 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 6 rows 8 cols
[2024-05-27 03:46:39] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-27 03:46:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 26 ms returned []
[2024-05-27 03:46:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 03:46:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 32 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 61 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 8/75 places, 6/45 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 118 ms. Remains : 8/75 places, 6/45 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 152 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-15
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 21797 reset in 129 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 21875 reset in 151 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X (AND (NOT p1) p0)), (X p0), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 155 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 144 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 16 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (3 steps per ms) remains 0/4 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X (AND (NOT p1) p0)), (X p0), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p1), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (F p0), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 314 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 149 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 148 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0)]
[2024-05-27 03:46:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 03:46:41] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2024-05-27 03:46:41] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 6 ms returned sat
[2024-05-27 03:46:41] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 5/6/5 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 1 ms.
[2024-05-27 03:46:41] [INFO ] Added : 0 causal constraints over 0 iterations in 15 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Support contains 4 out of 8 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 8/8 places, 6/6 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 8 /8 variables (removed 0) and now considering 6/6 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-27 03:46:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 03:46:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 24 ms returned []
[2024-05-27 03:46:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 03:46:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 32 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 58 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-27 03:46:41] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 5 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-27 03:46:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/8 variables, 2/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 6/14 variables, 8/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/14 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 14/14 variables, and 19 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 114 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 8/8 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/8 variables, 2/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 6/14 variables, 8/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 5/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/14 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 14/14 variables, and 24 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 101 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 8/8 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 221ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 222ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 288 ms. Remains : 8/8 places, 6/6 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (AND p0 (NOT p1))), (X p0), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 161 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 150 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 16 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (3 steps per ms) remains 0/4 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (AND p0 (NOT p1))), (X p0), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p1), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (F p0), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 349 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 149 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 149 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0)]
[2024-05-27 03:46:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 03:46:42] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2024-05-27 03:46:42] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 7 ms returned sat
[2024-05-27 03:46:42] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 5/6/5 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 1 ms.
[2024-05-27 03:46:42] [INFO ] Added : 0 causal constraints over 0 iterations in 5 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 148 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 21728 reset in 107 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 21854 reset in 124 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin11362488572442950677
[2024-05-27 03:46:43] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 6 transitions.
[2024-05-27 03:46:43] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-27 03:46:43] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 6 transitions.
[2024-05-27 03:46:43] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-27 03:46:43] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 6 transitions.
[2024-05-27 03:46:43] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-27 03:46:43] [INFO ] Built C files in 6ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin11362488572442950677
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin11362488572442950677;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 159 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin11362488572442950677;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 44 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin11362488572442950677;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased1769541120302369483.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 140 ms.
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES PARTIAL_ORDER EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01-LTLFireability-15 finished in 3676 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 19366 ms.

BK_STOP 1716781603564

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r202-smll-171649588000364"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01.tgz
mv IOTPpurchase-PT-C01M01P01D01 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;