fond
Model Checking Contest 2024
14th edition, Geneva, Switzerland, June 25, 2024
Execution of r202-smll-171649588000332
Last Updated
July 7, 2024

About the Execution of ITS-Tools for IBM319-PT-none

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
481.556 94707.00 131295.00 622.30 FTFFFTFFFFFFTFFF normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r202-smll-171649588000332.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is IBM319-PT-none, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r202-smll-171649588000332
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 676K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 93K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 62K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.2K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.2K Apr 22 14:49 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K Apr 22 14:49 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.5K Apr 22 14:50 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K Apr 22 14:50 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Apr 13 06:09 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 90K Apr 13 06:09 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Apr 13 06:08 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 76K Apr 13 06:08 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K Apr 22 14:50 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.1K Apr 22 14:50 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 184K May 18 16:42 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME IBM319-PT-none-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME IBM319-PT-none-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME IBM319-PT-none-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME IBM319-PT-none-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME IBM319-PT-none-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME IBM319-PT-none-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME IBM319-PT-none-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME IBM319-PT-none-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME IBM319-PT-none-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME IBM319-PT-none-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME IBM319-PT-none-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME IBM319-PT-none-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME IBM319-PT-none-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME IBM319-PT-none-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME IBM319-PT-none-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME IBM319-PT-none-LTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716776870249

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=IBM319-PT-none
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-27 02:27:53] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-27 02:27:53] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-27 02:27:53] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 203 ms
[2024-05-27 02:27:53] [INFO ] Transformed 253 places.
[2024-05-27 02:27:53] [INFO ] Transformed 178 transitions.
[2024-05-27 02:27:53] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-27 02:27:53] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 253 places and 178 transitions and 526 arcs in 441 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 26 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 5 formulas.
FORMULA IBM319-PT-none-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA IBM319-PT-none-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA IBM319-PT-none-LTLFireability-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA IBM319-PT-none-LTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA IBM319-PT-none-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 36 out of 253 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 253/253 places, 178/178 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 66 places
Reduce places removed 74 places and 0 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 75 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 178 transition count 178
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 86 place count 167 transition count 167
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 167 transition count 167
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 167 transition count 166
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 99 place count 166 transition count 165
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 166 transition count 165
Applied a total of 100 rules in 228 ms. Remains 166 /253 variables (removed 87) and now considering 165/178 (removed 13) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 165 rows 166 cols
[2024-05-27 02:27:54] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 33 ms
[2024-05-27 02:27:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 433 ms returned []
[2024-05-27 02:27:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 02:27:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 373 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 875 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 164 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-27 02:27:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 165/330 variables, 165/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/330 variables, 0/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Problem TDEAD19 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD23 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD70 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD94 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD125 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD148 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD157 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD160 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/331 variables, 1/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/331 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/331 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 156 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 331/331 variables, and 179 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 8 solved, 156 unsolved in 11729 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 166/166 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 164/164 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 8 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/155 variables, 2/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 158/313 variables, 155/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 148/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 8/321 variables, 6/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 8/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 0/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 4/325 variables, 2/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 0/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 5/330 variables, 2/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/330 variables, 0/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 1/331 variables, 1/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/331 variables, 0/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/331 variables, 0/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 156 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 331/331 variables, and 335 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 8 solved, 156 unsolved in 22589 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 166/166 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 156/164 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 34445ms problems are : Problem set: 8 solved, 156 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 8 dead transitions in 34480ms
Found 8 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 8 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 8 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 166/253 places, 157/178 transitions.
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 158 transition count 157
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Applied a total of 8 rules in 6 ms. Remains 158 /166 variables (removed 8) and now considering 157/157 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 157 rows 158 cols
[2024-05-27 02:28:29] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-27 02:28:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned []
[2024-05-27 02:28:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 02:28:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 127 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 186 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 158/253 places, 157/178 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 35832 ms. Remains : 158/253 places, 157/178 transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Support contains 30 out of 156 places after structural reductions.
FORMULA IBM319-PT-none-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-27 02:28:30] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for LTL removed 1 formulas.
[2024-05-27 02:28:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 49 ms
FORMULA IBM319-PT-none-LTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-27 02:28:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2024-05-27 02:28:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 157 transitions.
Support contains 28 out of 156 places (down from 30) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (841 resets) in 1377 ms. (29 steps per ms) remains 2/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (470 resets) in 468 ms. (85 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (458 resets) in 237 ms. (168 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 157 rows 156 cols
[2024-05-27 02:28:30] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 4 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 14/19 variables, 2/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 10/29 variables, 2/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 29/58 variables, 29/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 11/69 variables, 5/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 11/80 variables, 5/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 14/94 variables, 7/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 1/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 12/106 variables, 6/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 7/113 variables, 4/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 7/120 variables, 4/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 1/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 6/126 variables, 3/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 8/134 variables, 3/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (OVERLAPS) 13/147 variables, 5/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (OVERLAPS) 13/160 variables, 7/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 1/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (OVERLAPS) 12/172 variables, 6/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 33 (OVERLAPS) 11/183 variables, 5/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 34 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 35 (OVERLAPS) 11/194 variables, 5/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 36 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 37 (OVERLAPS) 12/206 variables, 6/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 38 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 39 (OVERLAPS) 11/217 variables, 6/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 40 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 41 (OVERLAPS) 11/228 variables, 5/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 42 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 43 (OVERLAPS) 15/243 variables, 7/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 44 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 1/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 45 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 46 (OVERLAPS) 18/261 variables, 8/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 47 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 0/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 48 (OVERLAPS) 23/284 variables, 11/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 49 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 0/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 50 (OVERLAPS) 17/301 variables, 11/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 51 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 3/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 52 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 0/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 53 (OVERLAPS) 8/309 variables, 5/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 54 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/309 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp3 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp10 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 313/313 variables, and 168 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved in 524 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 156/156 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 537ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 9 simplifications.
FORMULA IBM319-PT-none-LTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Computed a total of 156 stabilizing places and 157 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 156 transition count 157
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
FORMULA IBM319-PT-none-LTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((X(F(p0))||G(p1)||F(p2)))'
Support contains 3 out of 156 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 156/156 places, 157/157 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 10 places
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 144 transition count 157
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 141 transition count 154
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 141 transition count 154
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 139 transition count 152
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 139 transition count 152
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 137 transition count 150
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 137 transition count 150
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 136 transition count 149
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 136 transition count 149
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 135 transition count 148
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 135 transition count 148
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 134 transition count 147
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 134 transition count 147
Applied a total of 32 rules in 25 ms. Remains 134 /156 variables (removed 22) and now considering 147/157 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 147 rows 134 cols
[2024-05-27 02:28:31] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-27 02:28:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2024-05-27 02:28:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 02:28:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 117 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 171 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 146 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-27 02:28:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 147/280 variables, 133/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/280 variables, 0/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/281 variables, 1/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/281 variables, 0/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/281 variables, 0/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 281/281 variables, and 136 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved in 8612 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 134/134 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 146/146 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 147/280 variables, 133/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/280 variables, 146/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/280 variables, 0/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/281 variables, 1/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/281 variables, 0/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/281 variables, 0/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 281/281 variables, and 282 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved in 8359 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 134/134 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 146/146 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 17012ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 17022ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 134/156 places, 147/157 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 17221 ms. Remains : 134/156 places, 147/157 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 397 ms :[(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : IBM319-PT-none-LTLFireability-01
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 4255 reset in 337 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 4256 reset in 332 ms.
Computed a total of 134 stabilizing places and 147 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 134 transition count 147
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) p1), (X (NOT p2)), (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (X (AND p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p0))), (X (NOT p0)), (X p1), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1)), (F (G (NOT p2))), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge sufficient to adopt a stutter insensitive property.
Knowledge based reduction with 16 factoid took 177 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 5 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 9 states, 29 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 408 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (812 resets) in 251 ms. (158 steps per ms) remains 4/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (444 resets) in 199 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (476 resets) in 124 ms. (320 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (463 resets) in 161 ms. (246 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (479 resets) in 142 ms. (279 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
[2024-05-27 02:28:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 7/10 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 12/22 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 12/34 variables, 5/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 15/49 variables, 6/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 17/66 variables, 8/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 9/75 variables, 5/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 9/84 variables, 4/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 10/94 variables, 5/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 10/104 variables, 5/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 11/115 variables, 5/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 17/132 variables, 8/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 20/152 variables, 2/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (OVERLAPS) 30/182 variables, 25/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (OVERLAPS) 11/193 variables, 6/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (OVERLAPS) 11/204 variables, 4/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (OVERLAPS) 19/223 variables, 7/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 33 (OVERLAPS) 19/242 variables, 10/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 34 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 35 (OVERLAPS) 18/260 variables, 9/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 36 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 0/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 37 (OVERLAPS) 12/272 variables, 7/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 38 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Problem apf1 is UNSAT
Problem apf2 is UNSAT
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 39 (OVERLAPS) 8/280 variables, 5/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 40 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/280 variables, 0/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
Problem apf5 is UNSAT
Problem apf8 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 281/281 variables, and 136 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 0 unsolved in 747 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 134/134 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 756ms problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Found 4 invariant AP formulas.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) p1), (X (NOT p2)), (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (X (AND p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p0))), (X (NOT p0)), (X p1), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1)), (F (G (NOT p2))), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G p1)), (G (OR p0 (NOT p2) p1)), (G (OR (NOT p0) p2 p1)), (G (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1))), (G (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT (OR p0 p2 p1))), (F p0), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1))), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p2 (NOT p1)))), (F p2), (F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 20 factoid took 733 ms. Reduced automaton from 9 states, 29 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 13 states, 35 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 778 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 738 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false]
Support contains 3 out of 134 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 134/134 places, 147/147 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 149 edges and 134 vertex of which 124 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 10 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 10 places :
Also discarding 12 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 12 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 81 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 81 transitions
Performed 81 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 81
Iterating post reduction 0 with 81 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 123 transition count 53
Reduce places removed 81 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 1 with 87 rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 42 transition count 47
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 175 place count 38 transition count 45
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 178 place count 36 transition count 44
Performed 13 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 13 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 178 place count 36 transition count 31
Deduced a syphon composed of 13 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 206 place count 21 transition count 31
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 208 place count 20 transition count 30
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 211 place count 19 transition count 28
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 212 place count 18 transition count 28
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 7 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 212 place count 18 transition count 27
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 214 place count 17 transition count 27
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 3 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 228 place count 10 transition count 17
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 231 place count 10 transition count 14
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 233 place count 9 transition count 14
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 234 place count 9 transition count 13
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 235 place count 9 transition count 12
Applied a total of 235 rules in 68 ms. Remains 9 /134 variables (removed 125) and now considering 12/147 (removed 135) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 12 rows 9 cols
[2024-05-27 02:28:54] [INFO ] Computed 0 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-27 02:28:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
[2024-05-27 02:28:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 02:28:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 38 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 73 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-27 02:28:54] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 21 ms returned []
Running 10 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-27 02:28:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 11/19 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/21 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/21 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 21/21 variables, and 9 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved in 168 ms.
Refiners :[State Equation: 9/9 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 11/19 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 10/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 2/21 variables, 1/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/21 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 21/21 variables, and 19 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved in 147 ms.
Refiners :[State Equation: 9/9 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 325ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 327ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 9/134 places, 12/147 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 499 ms. Remains : 9/134 places, 12/147 transitions.
Computed a total of 9 stabilizing places and 12 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 9 transition count 12
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1), (X (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND p0 p2 (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND p0 p2 p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p2 p1))), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1)), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) p1))), (X p1), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p2 (NOT p1)))), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p2 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p2 p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p2 p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p2 (NOT p1))))), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G (NOT p2))), (F (G p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X (AND p0 (NOT p2) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 24 factoid took 717 ms. Reduced automaton from 13 states, 35 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 13 states, 38 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 733 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), false, false, false, false, false, false]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (9243 resets) in 290 ms. (137 steps per ms) remains 4/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (4904 resets) in 120 ms. (330 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (4904 resets) in 130 ms. (305 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (4846 resets) in 124 ms. (320 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (4845 resets) in 104 ms. (380 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
[2024-05-27 02:28:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 8/11 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 8/19 variables, 5/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Problem apf1 is UNSAT
Problem apf2 is UNSAT
Problem apf5 is UNSAT
Problem apf8 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 21/21 variables, and 9 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 0 unsolved in 84 ms.
Refiners :[State Equation: 9/9 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 90ms problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Found 4 invariant AP formulas.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1), (X (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND p0 p2 (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND p0 p2 p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p2 p1))), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1)), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) p1))), (X p1), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p2 (NOT p1)))), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p2 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p2 p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p2 p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p2 (NOT p1))))), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G (NOT p2))), (F (G p1)), (G (OR p0 (NOT p2) p1)), (G (OR (NOT p0) p2 p1)), (G (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1))), (G (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X (AND p0 (NOT p2) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (NOT (OR p0 p2 p1))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1))), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p2 (NOT p1)))), (F p2), (F (NOT p1)), (F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 28 factoid took 1171 ms. Reduced automaton from 13 states, 38 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 13 states, 35 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 829 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 741 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 705 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 39972 reset in 190 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 40073 reset in 208 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin15605836746577765901
[2024-05-27 02:29:00] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 12 transitions.
[2024-05-27 02:29:00] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 6 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-27 02:29:00] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 12 transitions.
[2024-05-27 02:29:00] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 2 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-27 02:29:00] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 12 transitions.
[2024-05-27 02:29:00] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-27 02:29:00] [INFO ] Built C files in 45ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin15605836746577765901
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin15605836746577765901;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 462 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin15605836746577765901;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 78 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin15605836746577765901;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased13052442495737124133.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 211 ms.
FORMULA IBM319-PT-none-LTLFireability-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES PARTIAL_ORDER EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property IBM319-PT-none-LTLFireability-01 finished in 29677 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((F((F(p1)&&p0))&&X(p2))))'
Support contains 5 out of 156 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 156/156 places, 157/157 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 places
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 146 transition count 157
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 144 transition count 155
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 144 transition count 155
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 142 transition count 153
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 142 transition count 153
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 140 transition count 151
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 140 transition count 151
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 139 transition count 150
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 139 transition count 150
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 138 transition count 149
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 138 transition count 149
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 137 transition count 148
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 137 transition count 148
Applied a total of 28 rules in 25 ms. Remains 137 /156 variables (removed 19) and now considering 148/157 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 148 rows 137 cols
[2024-05-27 02:29:01] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-27 02:29:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned []
[2024-05-27 02:29:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 02:29:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 176 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 248 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 147 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-27 02:29:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 148/284 variables, 136/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 0/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/285 variables, 1/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/285 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/285 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 285/285 variables, and 141 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved in 7952 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 147/147 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 148/284 variables, 136/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 147/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 0/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/285 variables, 1/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/285 variables, 0/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/285 variables, 0/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 285/285 variables, and 288 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved in 8642 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 147/147 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 16627ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 16634ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 137/156 places, 148/157 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 16908 ms. Remains : 137/156 places, 148/157 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 245 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p2), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : IBM319-PT-none-LTLFireability-04
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 94 steps with 0 reset in 4 ms.
FORMULA IBM319-PT-none-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property IBM319-PT-none-LTLFireability-04 finished in 17186 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 156 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 156/156 places, 157/157 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 180 edges and 156 vertex of which 130 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 26 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 26 places :
Also discarding 26 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 26 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 9 places
Reduce places removed 10 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 83 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 83 transitions
Performed 83 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 83
Iterating post reduction 0 with 83 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 120 transition count 47
Reduce places removed 83 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 1 with 92 rules applied. Total rules applied 176 place count 37 transition count 38
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 182 place count 31 transition count 38
Performed 13 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 13 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 182 place count 31 transition count 25
Deduced a syphon composed of 13 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 210 place count 16 transition count 25
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 212 place count 15 transition count 24
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 215 place count 14 transition count 22
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 216 place count 13 transition count 22
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 216 place count 13 transition count 21
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 218 place count 12 transition count 21
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 3 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 230 place count 6 transition count 12
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 233 place count 6 transition count 9
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 235 place count 5 transition count 9
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 236 place count 5 transition count 8
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 5 transition count 7
Applied a total of 237 rules in 13 ms. Remains 5 /156 variables (removed 151) and now considering 7/157 (removed 150) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 7 rows 5 cols
[2024-05-27 02:29:18] [INFO ] Computed 0 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-27 02:29:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 24 ms returned []
[2024-05-27 02:29:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 02:29:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 25 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 51 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-27 02:29:18] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 13 ms returned []
Running 4 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-27 02:29:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 7/11 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/12 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/12 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 12/12 variables, and 5 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 69 ms.
Refiners :[State Equation: 5/5 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 7/11 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 4/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/12 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/12 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 12/12 variables, and 9 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 79 ms.
Refiners :[State Equation: 5/5 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 152ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 152ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 5/156 places, 7/157 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 234 ms. Remains : 5/156 places, 7/157 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 50 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : IBM319-PT-none-LTLFireability-08
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA IBM319-PT-none-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property IBM319-PT-none-LTLFireability-08 finished in 304 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 156 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 156/156 places, 157/157 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 180 edges and 156 vertex of which 102 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 54 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 54 places :
Also discarding 55 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 55 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 7 places
Reduce places removed 8 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 67 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 67 transitions
Performed 67 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 67
Iterating post reduction 0 with 67 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 94 transition count 34
Reduce places removed 67 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 1 with 76 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 27 transition count 25
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 21 transition count 25
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 21 transition count 17
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 168 place count 11 transition count 17
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 170 place count 10 transition count 16
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 173 place count 9 transition count 14
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 8 transition count 14
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 8 transition count 13
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 176 place count 7 transition count 13
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 3 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 184 place count 3 transition count 6
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 186 place count 3 transition count 4
Applied a total of 186 rules in 9 ms. Remains 3 /156 variables (removed 153) and now considering 4/157 (removed 153) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 4 rows 3 cols
[2024-05-27 02:29:18] [INFO ] Computed 0 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-27 02:29:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 21 ms returned []
[2024-05-27 02:29:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 02:29:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 26 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 50 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-27 02:29:18] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 2 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-27 02:29:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 3/5 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/7 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/7 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 7/7 variables, and 3 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 43 ms.
Refiners :[State Equation: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 3/5 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 2/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 2/7 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/7 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 7/7 variables, and 5 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 48 ms.
Refiners :[State Equation: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 96ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 96ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 3/156 places, 4/157 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 162 ms. Remains : 3/156 places, 4/157 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 96 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : IBM319-PT-none-LTLFireability-09
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA IBM319-PT-none-LTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property IBM319-PT-none-LTLFireability-09 finished in 278 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((F(p0)||G(p1)))'
Support contains 4 out of 156 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 156/156 places, 157/157 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 180 edges and 156 vertex of which 100 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 56 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 56 places :
Also discarding 57 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 57 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 5 places
Reduce places removed 6 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 63 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 63 transitions
Performed 63 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 63
Iterating post reduction 0 with 63 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 94 transition count 36
Reduce places removed 63 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 1 with 72 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 31 transition count 27
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 142 place count 25 transition count 27
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 142 place count 25 transition count 19
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 159 place count 16 transition count 19
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 15 transition count 18
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 164 place count 14 transition count 16
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 165 place count 13 transition count 16
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 165 place count 13 transition count 15
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 167 place count 12 transition count 15
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 171 place count 10 transition count 13
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 10 transition count 10
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 176 place count 9 transition count 9
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 177 place count 9 transition count 8
Applied a total of 177 rules in 22 ms. Remains 9 /156 variables (removed 147) and now considering 8/157 (removed 149) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 8 rows 9 cols
[2024-05-27 02:29:19] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-27 02:29:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 29 ms returned [3]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 32 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 8/156 places, 8/157 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 7 transition count 7
Applied a total of 2 rules in 3 ms. Remains 7 /8 variables (removed 1) and now considering 7/8 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 7 rows 7 cols
[2024-05-27 02:29:19] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-27 02:29:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 25 ms returned []
[2024-05-27 02:29:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 02:29:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 33 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 61 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 7/156 places, 7/157 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 119 ms. Remains : 7/156 places, 7/157 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 164 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : IBM319-PT-none-LTLFireability-12
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 40003 reset in 142 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 39981 reset in 139 ms.
Computed a total of 7 stabilizing places and 7 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 7 transition count 7
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p1), (X (NOT p0)), (X (AND (NOT p0) p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1)), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 466 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 80 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
RANDOM walk for 78 steps (20 resets) in 4 ms. (15 steps per ms) remains 0/4 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p1), (X (NOT p0)), (X (AND (NOT p0) p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1)), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (F (NOT p1)), (F p0), (F (NOT (OR p1 p0))), (F (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 635 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 97 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 90 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Support contains 4 out of 7 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 7/7 places, 7/7 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 7 /7 variables (removed 0) and now considering 7/7 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-27 02:29:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 02:29:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 22 ms returned []
[2024-05-27 02:29:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 02:29:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 25 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 49 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-27 02:29:21] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 5 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-27 02:29:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 6/12 variables, 6/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 2/14 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/14 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 14/14 variables, and 9 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 92 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 7/7 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 6/12 variables, 6/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 5/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 2/14 variables, 1/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/14 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 14/14 variables, and 14 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 81 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 7/7 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 177ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 177ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 235 ms. Remains : 7/7 places, 7/7 transitions.
Computed a total of 7 stabilizing places and 7 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 7 transition count 7
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p1), (X (NOT p0)), (X (AND p1 (NOT p0))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X p1)), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0)))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 461 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 99 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
RANDOM walk for 36 steps (8 resets) in 5 ms. (6 steps per ms) remains 0/4 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p1), (X (NOT p0)), (X (AND p1 (NOT p0))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X p1)), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0))))), (F (NOT p1)), (F p0), (F (NOT (OR p1 p0))), (F (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 789 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 87 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 72 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 71 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 39930 reset in 111 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 40012 reset in 137 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin482810499201187568
[2024-05-27 02:29:23] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 7 transitions.
[2024-05-27 02:29:23] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 2 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-27 02:29:23] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 7 transitions.
[2024-05-27 02:29:23] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-27 02:29:23] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 7 transitions.
[2024-05-27 02:29:23] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-27 02:29:23] [INFO ] Built C files in 7ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin482810499201187568
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin482810499201187568;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 170 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin482810499201187568;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 44 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin482810499201187568;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased9193605850560375794.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 62 ms.
FORMULA IBM319-PT-none-LTLFireability-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES PARTIAL_ORDER EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property IBM319-PT-none-LTLFireability-12 finished in 4464 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(p0)&&F(G(p1)))))'
Support contains 3 out of 156 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 156/156 places, 157/157 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 180 edges and 156 vertex of which 140 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 16 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 16 places :
Also discarding 13 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 13 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 9 places
Reduce places removed 10 places and 1 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 87 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 87 transitions
Performed 87 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 87
Iterating post reduction 0 with 88 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 130 transition count 55
Reduce places removed 87 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 1 with 96 rules applied. Total rules applied 185 place count 43 transition count 46
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 192 place count 37 transition count 45
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 193 place count 36 transition count 45
Performed 13 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 13 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 193 place count 36 transition count 32
Deduced a syphon composed of 13 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 221 place count 21 transition count 32
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 222 place count 20 transition count 32
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 222 place count 20 transition count 31
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 224 place count 19 transition count 31
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 225 place count 18 transition count 30
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 226 place count 18 transition count 30
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 227 place count 18 transition count 29
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 227 place count 18 transition count 28
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 229 place count 17 transition count 28
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 4 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 245 place count 9 transition count 16
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 248 place count 9 transition count 13
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 250 place count 8 transition count 13
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 251 place count 8 transition count 12
Applied a total of 251 rules in 24 ms. Remains 8 /156 variables (removed 148) and now considering 12/157 (removed 145) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 12 rows 8 cols
[2024-05-27 02:29:23] [INFO ] Computed 0 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-27 02:29:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
[2024-05-27 02:29:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 02:29:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 32 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 62 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-27 02:29:23] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 11 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-27 02:29:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 12/19 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/20 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/20 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 20/20 variables, and 8 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved in 159 ms.
Refiners :[State Equation: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 12/19 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 11/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/20 variables, 1/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/20 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 20/20 variables, and 19 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved in 142 ms.
Refiners :[State Equation: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 306ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 308ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 8/156 places, 12/157 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 401 ms. Remains : 8/156 places, 12/157 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 141 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : IBM319-PT-none-LTLFireability-13
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 6 steps with 1 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA IBM319-PT-none-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property IBM319-PT-none-LTLFireability-13 finished in 563 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(p0)&&F(p1))))'
Support contains 3 out of 156 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 156/156 places, 157/157 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 180 edges and 156 vertex of which 49 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 107 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 107 places :
Also discarding 108 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 108 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 3 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 30 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 30 transitions
Performed 30 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 30
Iterating post reduction 0 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 46 transition count 18
Reduce places removed 30 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 16 transition count 15
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 14 transition count 15
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 14 transition count 11
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 10 transition count 11
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 9 transition count 10
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 8 transition count 8
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 7 transition count 8
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 7 transition count 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 6 transition count 7
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 6 transition count 7
Applied a total of 83 rules in 13 ms. Remains 6 /156 variables (removed 150) and now considering 7/157 (removed 150) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 7 rows 6 cols
[2024-05-27 02:29:24] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-27 02:29:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 21 ms returned []
[2024-05-27 02:29:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-27 02:29:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 26 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 49 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-27 02:29:24] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 5 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-27 02:29:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 6/11 variables, 5/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 2/13 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/13 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 13/13 variables, and 7 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 85 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 6/6 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 6/11 variables, 5/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 5/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 2/13 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/13 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 13/13 variables, and 12 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 95 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 6/6 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 186ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 186ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 6/156 places, 7/157 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 255 ms. Remains : 6/156 places, 7/157 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 140 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : IBM319-PT-none-LTLFireability-14
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 6 steps with 1 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA IBM319-PT-none-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property IBM319-PT-none-LTLFireability-14 finished in 414 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 91437 ms.

BK_STOP 1716776964956

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="IBM319-PT-none"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is IBM319-PT-none, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r202-smll-171649588000332"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/IBM319-PT-none.tgz
mv IBM319-PT-none execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;