Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r202-smll-171649587300057.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
....................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is HirschbergSinclair-PT-05, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r202-smll-171649587300057
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 624K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 92K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.9K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 52K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.4K Apr 22 14:48 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 30K Apr 22 14:48 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.4K Apr 22 14:48 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 21K Apr 22 14:48 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Apr 13 03:03 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 125K Apr 13 03:03 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.9K Apr 13 03:02 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 51K Apr 13 03:02 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.0K Apr 22 14:48 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.0K Apr 22 14:48 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 18 16:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 157K May 18 16:42 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME HirschbergSinclair-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME HirschbergSinclair-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME HirschbergSinclair-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME HirschbergSinclair-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME HirschbergSinclair-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME HirschbergSinclair-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME HirschbergSinclair-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME HirschbergSinclair-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME HirschbergSinclair-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME HirschbergSinclair-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME HirschbergSinclair-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME HirschbergSinclair-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME HirschbergSinclair-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME HirschbergSinclair-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME HirschbergSinclair-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME HirschbergSinclair-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2023-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716580605211

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=HirschbergSinclair-PT-05
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-24 19:56:47] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-24 19:56:47] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-24 19:56:47] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 159 ms
[2024-05-24 19:56:47] [INFO ] Transformed 124 places.
[2024-05-24 19:56:48] [INFO ] Transformed 111 transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:56:48] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 124 places and 111 transitions and 340 arcs in 406 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 41 ms.
Support contains 102 out of 124 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 124/124 places, 111/111 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 38 ms. Remains 124 /124 variables (removed 0) and now considering 111/111 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 111 rows 124 cols
[2024-05-24 19:56:48] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 31 ms
[2024-05-24 19:56:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 475 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 19:56:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 19:56:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 168 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 706 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 106 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:56:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 9/123 variables, 10/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
[2024-05-24 19:56:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 119 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 19:56:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 67 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 2/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/124 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 111/235 variables, 124/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/235 variables, 0/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 235/235 variables, and 139 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved in 5865 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 124/124 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 106/106 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 9/123 variables, 10/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 2/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/124 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 111/235 variables, 124/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 106/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
[2024-05-24 19:56:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 96 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 1/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
[2024-05-24 19:57:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 99 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 19:57:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 111 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 2/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
[2024-05-24 19:57:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 91 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 19:57:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 116 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 2/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
[2024-05-24 19:57:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 95 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 19:57:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 85 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 2/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
[2024-05-24 19:57:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 87 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 19:57:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 81 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 2/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/235 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 235/235 variables, and 254 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved in 26674 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 124/124 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 106/106 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints]
After SMT, in 32677ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 32702ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 33499 ms. Remains : 124/124 places, 111/111 transitions.
Support contains 102 out of 124 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-24 19:57:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 68 ms
[2024-05-24 19:57:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2024-05-24 19:57:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 111 transitions.
Support contains 101 out of 124 places (down from 102) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (360 resets) in 2907 ms. (13 steps per ms) remains 22/98 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 145 ms. (27 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 151 ms. (26 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 66 ms. (59 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 76 ms. (51 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 35 ms. (111 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 48 ms. (81 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 63 ms. (62 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (12 resets) in 39 ms. (100 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 53 ms. (74 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 25 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 33 ms. (117 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 48 ms. (81 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 29 ms. (133 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
[2024-05-24 19:57:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp5 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp6 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp11 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp18 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp28 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp30 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp42 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp46 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp47 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp48 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp54 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp60 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp71 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp85 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp90 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp95 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 80/114 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 16 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 16 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 8/122 variables, 3/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 16 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 16 solved, 6 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp20 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp65 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp80 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 111/233 variables, 122/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 19 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 19 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 2/235 variables, 2/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 19 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 19 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/235 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 19 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 235/235 variables, and 137 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 19 solved, 3 unsolved in 408 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 124/124 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 19 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 19 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 93/100 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 19 solved, 3 unsolved
[2024-05-24 19:57:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 75 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 19 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 19 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 10/110 variables, 3/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 19 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 19 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 9/119 variables, 3/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 19 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 19 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 111/230 variables, 119/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 19 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 2/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 19 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 19 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 5/235 variables, 5/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 19 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 1/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 19 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 19 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/235 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 19 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 235/235 variables, and 141 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 19 solved, 3 unsolved in 487 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 124/124 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/22 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 912ms problems are : Problem set: 19 solved, 3 unsolved
Finished Parikh walk after 4913 steps, including 187 resets, run visited all 3 properties in 139 ms. (steps per millisecond=35 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Parikh walk visited 3 properties in 153 ms.
Successfully simplified 19 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
FORMULA HirschbergSinclair-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2024-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-24 19:57:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-05-24 19:57:24] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA HirschbergSinclair-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2024-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-24 19:57:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2024-05-24 19:57:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 111 transitions.
Support contains 73 out of 124 places (down from 81) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 124 stabilizing places and 111 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 124 transition count 111
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
AF dead knowledge conclusive for 1 formulas.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 124/124 places, 111/111 transitions.
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 119 transition count 111
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 115 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 115 transition count 107
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 112 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 112 transition count 104
Applied a total of 19 rules in 62 ms. Remains 112 /124 variables (removed 12) and now considering 104/111 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 104 rows 112 cols
[2024-05-24 19:57:24] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 7 ms
[2024-05-24 19:57:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 132 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 19:57:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 19:57:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 273 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 414 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 99 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:57:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 5/112 variables, 5/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 104/216 variables, 112/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/216 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 216/216 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved in 2974 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 112/112 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 99/99 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 5/112 variables, 5/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 104/216 variables, 112/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 99/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/216 variables, 0/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 216/216 variables, and 219 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved in 7770 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 112/112 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 99/99 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 10791ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 10793ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 112/124 places, 104/111 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 11271 ms. Remains : 112/124 places, 104/111 transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:57:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-24 19:57:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-24 19:57:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 104 transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:57:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-05-24 19:57:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-05-24 19:57:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15696209023673505809.gal : 8 ms
[2024-05-24 19:57:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8622346932961149092.ctl : 6 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15696209023673505809.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8622346932961149092.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.87716e+06,0.378422,10132,2,5195,5,26960,6,0,550,25869,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((((election_2_0_1_to_left_2>=1) * EF((reply_2_0_to_right_1<1))) * ((AX(AF((election_2_0_1_to_left_2>=1))) + (rcv_right_election_5_2_4_...296
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((((election_2_0_1_to_left_2>=1) * E(TRUE U (reply_2_0_to_right_1<1))) * ((!(EX(!(!(EG(!((election_2...359
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t6, t8, t11, t13, t15, t17, t21, t88, t98, t103, Intersection with reach...230
(forward)formula 0,1,19.4205,479368,1,0,1277,3.26708e+06,245,657,3443,2.39178e+06,1350
FORMULA HirschbergSinclair-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2024-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 124/124 places, 111/111 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 236 edges and 124 vertex of which 119 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 5 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 5 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Reduce places removed 5 places and 5 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 46 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 46 transitions
Performed 46 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 46
Iterating post reduction 0 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 114 transition count 60
Reduce places removed 46 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 68 transition count 60
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 98 place count 63 transition count 55
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 63 transition count 55
Applied a total of 103 rules in 44 ms. Remains 63 /124 variables (removed 61) and now considering 55/111 (removed 56) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 55 rows 63 cols
[2024-05-24 19:57:55] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 19:57:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 96 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 19:57:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 19:57:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 143 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 243 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-24 19:57:56] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 46 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:57:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 46 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 46 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/56 variables, 6/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 46 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 46 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 48/104 variables, 56/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 46 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 46 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 46 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 104/118 variables, and 64 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 46 unsolved in 1262 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 56/63 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 46/46 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 46 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 46 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 46 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/56 variables, 6/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 46 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 46 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 48/104 variables, 56/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 46 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 46/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 46 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 46 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 46 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 104/118 variables, and 110 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 46 unsolved in 1165 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 56/63 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 46/46 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2450ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 46 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2452ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/124 places, 55/111 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2748 ms. Remains : 63/124 places, 55/111 transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:57:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 19:57:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 19:57:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 55 transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:57:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 19:57:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 19:57:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10417538402321657379.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 19:57:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11143153897304877999.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10417538402321657379.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11143153897304877999.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,81375,0.032145,4364,2,675,5,4054,6,0,302,2903,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EG((rcv_left_election_5_2_2_2<=0)) * ((reply_5_0_right5<1)||(rcv_right_reply_5_1_1>0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((reply_5_0_right5<1)||(rcv_right_reply_5_1_1>0))),(rcv_left_election_5_2_2_2<=0))] != ...160
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 53/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,0.304489,13076,1,0,70,45832,19,4,1508,34288,68
FORMULA HirschbergSinclair-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2024-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 124/124 places, 111/111 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 236 edges and 124 vertex of which 119 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 5 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 5 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Reduce places removed 4 places and 4 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 46 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 46 transitions
Performed 46 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 46
Iterating post reduction 0 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 115 transition count 61
Reduce places removed 46 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 69 transition count 59
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 67 transition count 59
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 102 place count 62 transition count 54
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 62 transition count 54
Applied a total of 107 rules in 27 ms. Remains 62 /124 variables (removed 62) and now considering 54/111 (removed 57) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 54 rows 62 cols
[2024-05-24 19:57:58] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 19:57:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 79 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 19:57:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 19:57:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 8 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 19:57:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 133 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 215 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-24 19:57:59] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 47 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:57:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 19:57:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 8 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/56 variables, 5/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 48/104 variables, 56/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 8/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 104/116 variables, and 72 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved in 867 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 56/62 constraints, ReadFeed: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/56 variables, 5/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 48/104 variables, 56/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 8/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 47/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 104/116 variables, and 119 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved in 1416 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 56/62 constraints, ReadFeed: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2295ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2297ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 62/124 places, 54/111 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2546 ms. Remains : 62/124 places, 54/111 transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:58:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 19:58:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 19:58:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 54 transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:58:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 19:58:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 19:58:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2071662313879807776.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 19:58:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality430022177677469872.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2071662313879807776.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality430022177677469872.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,77750,0.027375,4364,2,605,5,3768,6,0,297,2721,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((election_5_0_1_to_left_5<=election_5_3_4_to_right_3))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(election_5_0_1_to_left_5<=election_5_3_4_to_right_3))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 50/0/4
(forward)formula 0,0,0.24335,12284,1,0,68,45472,18,4,1484,33769,66
FORMULA HirschbergSinclair-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2024-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 124/124 places, 111/111 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 236 edges and 124 vertex of which 119 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 5 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 5 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Reduce places removed 4 places and 4 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 27 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 27 transitions
Performed 27 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 27
Iterating post reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 115 transition count 80
Reduce places removed 27 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 1 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 88 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 84 transition count 76
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 68 place count 79 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 79 transition count 71
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 74 place count 78 transition count 70
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 78 transition count 70
Applied a total of 75 rules in 26 ms. Remains 78 /124 variables (removed 46) and now considering 70/111 (removed 41) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 70 rows 78 cols
[2024-05-24 19:58:01] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-24 19:58:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 72 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 19:58:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 19:58:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 129 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 206 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-24 19:58:01] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 63 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:58:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/73 variables, 6/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 66/139 variables, 73/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 5/144 variables, 3/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/144 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 144/148 variables, and 84 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved in 1550 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 76/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/73 variables, 6/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 66/139 variables, 73/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 43/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 5/144 variables, 3/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 20/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/144 variables, 0/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 144/148 variables, and 147 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved in 2706 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 76/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 4274ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4276ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 78/124 places, 70/111 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4516 ms. Remains : 78/124 places, 70/111 transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:58:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-24 19:58:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-24 19:58:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 70 transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:58:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-24 19:58:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-24 19:58:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9738270313445813567.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 19:58:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16977819117087645677.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9738270313445813567.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16977819117087645677.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,218300,0.045248,5024,2,1074,5,6489,6,0,380,4665,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((E(((AG((rcv_left_election_5_3_3_3<=reply_5_0_to_left_1)) + (reply_5_2_to_right_4>1)) + ((newmsg4>1)||(((elected_5_to_left_4<=rcv_righ...391
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(((!(E(TRUE U !((rcv_left_election_5_3_3_3<=reply_5_0_to_left_1)))) + (reply_5_2_to_right_4>1)) +...448
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t4, t5, t8, t9, t60, t65, t69, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled....203
dead was empty
(forward)formula 0,1,1.48529,49760,1,0,470,276523,175,224,2356,207418,523
FORMULA HirschbergSinclair-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2024-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 124/124 places, 111/111 transitions.
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 120 transition count 111
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 116 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 116 transition count 107
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 113 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 113 transition count 104
Applied a total of 18 rules in 12 ms. Remains 113 /124 variables (removed 11) and now considering 104/111 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 104 rows 113 cols
[2024-05-24 19:58:07] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-24 19:58:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 202 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 19:58:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 19:58:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 181 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 384 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 99 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:58:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/109 variables, 1/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 4/113 variables, 5/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 104/217 variables, 113/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/217 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 217/217 variables, and 122 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved in 4213 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 113/113 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 99/99 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/109 variables, 1/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 4/113 variables, 5/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 104/217 variables, 113/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 99/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/217 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 217/217 variables, and 221 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved in 7737 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 113/113 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 99/99 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 11992ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11993ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 113/124 places, 104/111 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12392 ms. Remains : 113/124 places, 104/111 transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:58:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-24 19:58:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-24 19:58:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 104 transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:58:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2024-05-24 19:58:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-24 19:58:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11912472664263647160.gal : 19 ms
[2024-05-24 19:58:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6625830575105811885.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11912472664263647160.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6625830575105811885.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.8423e+06,0.372487,10464,2,5393,5,27829,6,0,551,26825,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(AX((((((reply_2_0_left2<=0)||(rcv_left_reply_5_0_5<=1))&&(rcv_left_election_5_2_2_2<=reply_2_0_left2)) + AF((rcv_left_election_5_3_4_4...431
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (((([((FwdU(Init,!((((election_2_0_1_to_left_2<=newmsg2) * E(TRUE U (election_5_3_1_to_left_5>=1))) * ((rcv_righ...1767
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t6, t8, t14, t16, t18, t21, t88, t98, t103, Intersection with reachable ...225
(forward)formula 0,1,6.84202,184204,1,0,342,994278,251,131,3417,757330,361
FORMULA HirschbergSinclair-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2024-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 124/124 places, 111/111 transitions.
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 119 transition count 111
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 114 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 114 transition count 106
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 110 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 110 transition count 102
Applied a total of 23 rules in 7 ms. Remains 110 /124 variables (removed 14) and now considering 102/111 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 102 rows 110 cols
[2024-05-24 19:58:27] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 5 ms
[2024-05-24 19:58:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 173 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 19:58:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 19:58:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 209 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 384 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 97 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:58:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 5/110 variables, 5/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 102/212 variables, 110/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 0/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/212 variables, 0/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 212/212 variables, and 118 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 3464 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 110/110 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 5/110 variables, 5/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 102/212 variables, 110/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 97/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 0/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/212 variables, 0/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 212/212 variables, and 215 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 5818 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 110/110 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 9326ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 9328ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 110/124 places, 102/111 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 9721 ms. Remains : 110/124 places, 102/111 transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:58:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-24 19:58:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-24 19:58:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 102 transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:58:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-24 19:58:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-24 19:58:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10685274795563193044.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 19:58:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11749092384743168899.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10685274795563193044.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11749092384743168899.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.27628e+06,0.201248,9920,2,4924,5,25882,6,0,540,25295,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AX(((AF((reply_4_0_to_right_3<1)) * (rcv_right_election_5_1_2_3>=1)) * (rcv_right_reply_5_1_1<=1))) + AX(AX(((reply_5_2_to_right_3<1)...190
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(((!(EG(!((reply_4_0_to_right_3<1)))) * (rcv_right_election_5_1_2_3>=1)) * (rcv_right...297
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t16, t19, t86, t96, t101, Intersection with reach...230
(forward)formula 0,1,9.27173,234564,1,0,779,1.42057e+06,228,352,3258,1.10822e+06,806
FORMULA HirschbergSinclair-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2024-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 124/124 places, 111/111 transitions.
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 120 transition count 111
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 115 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 115 transition count 106
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 110 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 110 transition count 101
Applied a total of 24 rules in 6 ms. Remains 110 /124 variables (removed 14) and now considering 101/111 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 110 cols
[2024-05-24 19:58:46] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-24 19:58:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 97 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 19:58:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 19:58:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 218 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 318 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 96 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:58:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/106 variables, 1/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
[2024-05-24 19:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 1/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 4/110 variables, 4/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
[2024-05-24 19:58:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 66 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
[2024-05-24 19:58:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 87 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 101/211 variables, 110/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/211 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/211 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 211/211 variables, and 122 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved in 5647 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 110/110 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/106 variables, 1/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 2/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 4/110 variables, 4/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
[2024-05-24 19:58:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
[2024-05-24 19:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 1/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 101/211 variables, 110/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/211 variables, 96/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
[2024-05-24 19:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 19:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 19:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/211 variables, 3/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
[2024-05-24 19:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/211 variables, 1/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
[2024-05-24 19:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/211 variables, 1/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
[2024-05-24 19:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/211 variables, 1/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/211 variables, 0/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
[2024-05-24 19:59:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/211 variables, 1/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
[2024-05-24 19:59:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/211 variables, 1/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/211 variables, 0/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 0/211 variables, 0/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 211/211 variables, and 228 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved in 23118 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 110/110 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints]
After SMT, in 28795ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 28798ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 110/124 places, 101/111 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 29125 ms. Remains : 110/124 places, 101/111 transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:59:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-24 19:59:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 19:59:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 101 transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:59:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-24 19:59:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-24 19:59:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17045821606765212800.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 19:59:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8200980226356703931.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17045821606765212800.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8200980226356703931.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.89686e+06,0.189326,9656,2,4628,5,22546,6,0,536,22523,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(EX((AG((election_5_2_1_to_left_5<1)) * EX(EF((reply_5_2_right5<=reply_5_2_to_right_1)))))) * EF((EX((elected_5_to_left5<=elected_5_to...368
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(EX((!(E(TRUE U !((election_5_2_1_to_left_5<1)))) * EX(E(TRUE U (reply_5_2_right5<=reply_5_2_to_r...473
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t16, t18, t85, t95, t100, Intersection with reach...230
(forward)formula 0,0,3.80506,96708,1,0,272,543023,232,151,3399,355053,305
FORMULA HirschbergSinclair-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2024-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 124/124 places, 111/111 transitions.
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 119 transition count 111
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 114 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 114 transition count 106
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 109 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 109 transition count 101
Applied a total of 25 rules in 10 ms. Remains 109 /124 variables (removed 15) and now considering 101/111 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 109 cols
[2024-05-24 19:59:19] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-24 19:59:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 180 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 19:59:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 19:59:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 170 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 359 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 96 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:59:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 5/109 variables, 5/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 101/210 variables, 109/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/210 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 210/210 variables, and 117 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved in 3090 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 5/109 variables, 5/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 101/210 variables, 109/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 96/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 0/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/210 variables, 0/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 210/210 variables, and 213 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved in 6962 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 10080ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 10082ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 109/124 places, 101/111 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 10451 ms. Remains : 109/124 places, 101/111 transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:59:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 19:59:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 19:59:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 101 transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:59:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 19:59:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 19:59:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality341856672283395453.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 19:59:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6860072977253707955.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality341856672283395453.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6860072977253707955.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.89686e+06,0.160291,9116,2,4420,5,21730,6,0,535,21850,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((rcv_left_election_5_3_1_1<=0) + AF(((election_5_2_4_to_right_3>0) * AX(FALSE)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((rcv_left_election_5_3_1_1<=0) + !(EG(!(((election_5_2_4_to_right_3>0) * !(EX(!(FALSE)))))))))] != F...159
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t16, t18, t85, t95, t100, Intersection with reach...230
(forward)formula 0,1,9.02896,253904,1,0,570,1.35198e+06,229,329,3353,1.29567e+06,566
FORMULA HirschbergSinclair-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2024-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 124/124 places, 111/111 transitions.
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 120 transition count 111
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 116 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 116 transition count 107
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 112 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 112 transition count 103
Applied a total of 20 rules in 9 ms. Remains 112 /124 variables (removed 12) and now considering 103/111 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 103 rows 112 cols
[2024-05-24 19:59:38] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-24 19:59:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 133 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 19:59:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 19:59:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 260 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 397 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 98 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:59:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 6/112 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
[2024-05-24 19:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 19:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 103/215 variables, 112/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 0/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/215 variables, 0/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 215/215 variables, and 123 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved in 4316 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 112/112 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 98/98 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 6/112 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 103/215 variables, 112/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 98/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
[2024-05-24 19:59:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 67 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 19:59:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 19:59:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 19:59:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 81 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 19:59:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 19:59:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 6/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 0/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/215 variables, 0/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 215/215 variables, and 227 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved in 8684 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 112/112 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 98/98 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints]
After SMT, in 13043ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 13045ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 112/124 places, 103/111 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 13451 ms. Remains : 112/124 places, 103/111 transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:59:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-24 19:59:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-24 19:59:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 103 transitions.
[2024-05-24 19:59:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-24 19:59:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 19:59:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality990099644487773522.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 19:59:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11448438877954357288.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality990099644487773522.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11448438877954357288.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91973e+06,0.172236,9400,2,4513,5,22348,6,0,546,22312,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((EX(AX(AF((rcv_left_election_5_3_5_5>=1)))) + ((rcv_right_election_3_0_1_2>reply_5_2_to_right_4) * (EX((elected>election_5_3_2_to_righ...307
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * !(((rcv_right_election_3_0_1_2>reply_5_2_to_right_4) * (EX((elected>election_5_3_2_to_right_1)) + ...369
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t16, t18, t87, t97, Intersection with reachable a...224
(forward)formula 0,0,7.41399,222228,1,0,779,1.32747e+06,231,349,3310,1.0635e+06,810
FORMULA HirschbergSinclair-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2024-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 124/124 places, 111/111 transitions.
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 120 transition count 111
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 116 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 116 transition count 107
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 112 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 112 transition count 103
Applied a total of 20 rules in 11 ms. Remains 112 /124 variables (removed 12) and now considering 103/111 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 103 rows 112 cols
[2024-05-24 19:59:59] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 20:00:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 121 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 20:00:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 20:00:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 167 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 289 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 98 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:00:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/108 variables, 1/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 4/112 variables, 5/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 103/215 variables, 112/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 0/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/215 variables, 0/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 215/215 variables, and 121 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved in 3782 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 112/112 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 98/98 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/108 variables, 1/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 4/112 variables, 5/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 103/215 variables, 112/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 98/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 0/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/215 variables, 0/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 215/215 variables, and 219 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved in 7806 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 112/112 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 98/98 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 11624ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11626ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 112/124 places, 103/111 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 11930 ms. Remains : 112/124 places, 103/111 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:00:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 20:00:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 20:00:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 103 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:00:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 20:00:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 20:00:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality67487631834583798.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 20:00:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17741832337865035573.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality67487631834583798.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17741832337865035573.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.43706e+06,0.230551,10720,2,5587,5,28706,6,0,546,27568,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AG((EG(AG((election_5_1_2_to_right_1<=0))) + EF((election_5_1_2_to_right_1<=reply_4_0_left4)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !((EG(!(E(TRUE U !((election_5_1_2_to_right_1<=0))))) + E(TRUE U (election_5_1_2_to_righ...192
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t16, t87, t97, t102, Intersection with reachable ...225
(forward)formula 0,1,12.0459,304728,1,0,665,1.88916e+06,234,388,3435,1.42947e+06,690
FORMULA HirschbergSinclair-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2024-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 124/124 places, 111/111 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 236 edges and 124 vertex of which 119 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 5 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 5 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Reduce places removed 5 places and 5 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 40 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 40 transitions
Performed 40 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 40
Iterating post reduction 0 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 114 transition count 66
Reduce places removed 40 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 74 transition count 64
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 72 transition count 64
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 87 place count 70 transition count 62
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 70 transition count 62
Applied a total of 89 rules in 12 ms. Remains 70 /124 variables (removed 54) and now considering 62/111 (removed 49) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 62 rows 70 cols
[2024-05-24 20:00:24] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-24 20:00:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 81 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 20:00:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 20:00:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 120 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 202 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-24 20:00:24] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 53 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:00:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/63 variables, 6/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 57/120 variables, 63/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 2/122 variables, 2/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 122/132 variables, and 73 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved in 1497 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 65/70 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 53/53 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/63 variables, 6/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 57/120 variables, 63/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 53/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 2/122 variables, 2/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 122/132 variables, and 126 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved in 1879 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 65/70 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 53/53 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 3385ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3386ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 70/124 places, 62/111 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3608 ms. Remains : 70/124 places, 62/111 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:00:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 20:00:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 20:00:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 62 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:00:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 20:00:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 20:00:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15931759200456569141.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 20:00:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9449900868212763347.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15931759200456569141.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9449900868212763347.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,214260,0.060734,4688,2,933,5,5289,6,0,336,3912,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((rcv_right_election_5_1_2_3>=1) U AG(E((rcv_right_election_5_3_5_5<=reply_5_1_right5) U !((AG((rcv_left_reply_2_0_2<=rcv_right_reply_5_...251
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(rcv_right_election_5_1_2_3>=1)) * !(E(TRUE U !(E((rcv_right_election_5_3_5_5<=reply_5_1_right5) U !...321
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t8, t9, t50, t59, t61, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reve...186
(forward)formula 0,0,0.730939,20180,1,0,155,107630,151,79,2012,69912,160
FORMULA HirschbergSinclair-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 124/124 places, 111/111 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 236 edges and 124 vertex of which 120 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 4 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 4 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Reduce places removed 4 places and 4 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 35 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 35 transitions
Performed 35 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 35
Iterating post reduction 0 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 116 transition count 72
Reduce places removed 35 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 81 transition count 71
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 80 transition count 71
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 76 place count 77 transition count 68
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 77 transition count 68
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 75 transition count 66
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 75 transition count 66
Applied a total of 83 rules in 10 ms. Remains 75 /124 variables (removed 49) and now considering 66/111 (removed 45) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 66 rows 75 cols
[2024-05-24 20:00:28] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 20:00:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 74 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 20:00:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 20:00:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 102 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 178 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-24 20:00:28] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 59 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:00:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/69 variables, 1/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/70 variables, 5/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 62/132 variables, 70/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/133 variables, 1/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/133 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 133/141 variables, and 80 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved in 2008 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 71/75 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/69 variables, 1/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/70 variables, 5/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 62/132 variables, 70/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 59/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/133 variables, 1/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/133 variables, 0/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 133/141 variables, and 139 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved in 3293 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 71/75 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5312ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5313ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 75/124 places, 66/111 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5507 ms. Remains : 75/124 places, 66/111 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:00:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 20:00:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 20:00:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 66 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:00:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 20:00:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 20:00:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1592451836749559841.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 20:00:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4261918363699605080.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1592451836749559841.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4261918363699605080.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,353260,0.041455,4736,2,1109,5,5723,6,0,358,4231,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((rcv_right_election_5_3_3_2<=reply_3_0_left3) * EG(AG(EF((reply_2_0_to_right_1<=newmsg5))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((rcv_right_election_5_3_3_2<=reply_3_0_left3) * EG(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U (reply_2_0_to_right_1<=newm...176
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t2, t10, t53, t59, t64, t65, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroye...192
(forward)formula 0,0,1.34199,44400,1,0,530,242877,162,289,2196,216584,495
FORMULA HirschbergSinclair-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 124/124 places, 111/111 transitions.
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 119 transition count 111
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 116 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 116 transition count 108
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 113 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 113 transition count 105
Applied a total of 17 rules in 6 ms. Remains 113 /124 variables (removed 11) and now considering 105/111 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 105 rows 113 cols
[2024-05-24 20:00:35] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 20:00:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 92 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 20:00:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 20:00:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 184 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 282 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 100 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:00:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 5/113 variables, 5/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 105/218 variables, 113/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/218 variables, 0/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 218/218 variables, and 121 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved in 3651 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 113/113 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 5/113 variables, 5/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 105/218 variables, 113/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 100/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/218 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 218/218 variables, and 221 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved in 7579 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 113/113 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 11275ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11279ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 113/124 places, 105/111 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 11567 ms. Remains : 113/124 places, 105/111 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:00:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 20:00:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 20:00:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 105 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:00:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 20:00:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 20:00:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5227719678622406960.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 20:00:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5741202400366625372.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5227719678622406960.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5741202400366625372.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.09845e+06,0.232664,10468,2,5363,5,28096,6,0,555,26619,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((AF((EG((reply_5_2_to_left_2>rcv_left_reply_4_0_4)) * EX((rcv_right_reply_5_2_1>reply_5_1_to_left_1)))) + (election_5_1_1_to_right_5<...226
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((!(EG(!((EG((reply_5_2_to_left_2>rcv_left_reply_4_0_4)) * EX((rcv_right_reply_5_2_1>reply_5_1_to_lef...287
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t6, t8, t10, t12, t16, t18, t22, t89, t99, t104, Intersection with reach...230
(forward)formula 0,1,8.3611,220240,1,0,355,1.22809e+06,241,138,3629,892938,395
FORMULA HirschbergSinclair-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 124/124 places, 111/111 transitions.
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 120 transition count 111
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 116 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 116 transition count 107
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 113 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 113 transition count 104
Applied a total of 18 rules in 4 ms. Remains 113 /124 variables (removed 11) and now considering 104/111 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 104 rows 113 cols
[2024-05-24 20:00:55] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 20:00:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 72 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 20:00:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 20:00:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 145 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 262 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 99 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:00:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/109 variables, 1/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 4/113 variables, 5/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 104/217 variables, 113/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/217 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 217/217 variables, and 122 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved in 4328 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 113/113 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 99/99 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/109 variables, 1/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 4/113 variables, 5/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 104/217 variables, 113/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 99/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/217 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 217/217 variables, and 221 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved in 8941 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 113/113 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 99/99 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 13296ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 13298ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 113/124 places, 104/111 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 13565 ms. Remains : 113/124 places, 104/111 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:01:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 20:01:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-24 20:01:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 104 transitions.
[2024-05-24 20:01:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 20:01:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 20:01:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5675498367381934803.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 20:01:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3752275675427774614.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5675498367381934803.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3752275675427774614.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.42209e+06,0.239646,10196,2,5532,5,26828,6,0,551,26633,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((EX(AX(FALSE)) + E((rcv_right_reply_5_1_1<=reply_5_2_to_left_4) U (((EG((election_5_3_5_to_right_4<=election_5_3_4_to_left_2)) + ((new...362
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(EX(!(EX(!(FALSE)))) + E((rcv_right_reply_5_1_1<=reply_5_2_to_left_4) U (((EG((election_5_3_5_to_righ...411
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t6, t8, t10, t12, t18, t20, t88, t98, t103, Intersection with reachable ...225
dead was empty
(forward)formula 0,0,9.45895,277044,1,0,788,1.67138e+06,237,358,3366,1.36527e+06,821
FORMULA HirschbergSinclair-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2024-05-24 20:01:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-24 20:01:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Total runtime 270954 ms.

BK_STOP 1716580878654

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="HirschbergSinclair-PT-05"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is HirschbergSinclair-PT-05, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r202-smll-171649587300057"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/HirschbergSinclair-PT-05.tgz
mv HirschbergSinclair-PT-05 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;