About the Execution of ITS-Tools for HealthRecord-PT-11
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
553.556 | 97637.00 | 133888.00 | 284.40 | FFTFFFFFFTFTTFTF | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r180-tall-171640604200777.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is HealthRecord-PT-11, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r180-tall-171640604200777
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 432K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.1K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 63K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.0K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 42K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K May 19 07:10 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K May 19 15:57 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K Apr 22 14:48 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Apr 22 14:48 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.9K Apr 12 20:28 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 91K Apr 12 20:28 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.7K Apr 12 20:25 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 43K Apr 12 20:25 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Apr 22 14:48 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 22 14:48 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 18 16:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 70K May 18 16:42 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLCardinality-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLCardinality-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLCardinality-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLCardinality-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLCardinality-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLCardinality-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLCardinality-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLCardinality-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLCardinality-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLCardinality-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLCardinality-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLCardinality-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLCardinality-2023-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1716520342186
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=HealthRecord-PT-11
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-24 03:12:23] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-24 03:12:23] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-24 03:12:23] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 71 ms
[2024-05-24 03:12:23] [INFO ] Transformed 159 places.
[2024-05-24 03:12:23] [INFO ] Transformed 334 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:12:23] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-24 03:12:23] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 159 places and 334 transitions and 879 arcs in 163 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 13 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
Ensure Unique test removed 27 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 27 transitions.
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLCardinality-2024-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLCardinality-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 62 out of 159 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 159/159 places, 307/307 transitions.
Discarding 56 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 56 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 103 transition count 201
Iterating global reduction 0 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 103 transition count 201
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 113 place count 102 transition count 199
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 102 transition count 199
Applied a total of 114 rules in 25 ms. Remains 102 /159 variables (removed 57) and now considering 199/307 (removed 108) transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:12:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 193 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 193 rows 102 cols
[2024-05-24 03:12:23] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 14 ms
[2024-05-24 03:12:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 191 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 03:12:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 193 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:12:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:12:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 03:12:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 115 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 334 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 198 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:12:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 193 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:12:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:12:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/102 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 8/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:12:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 14/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:12:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 4/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:12:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 5/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:12:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:12:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 2/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 192/294 variables, 102/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 0/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/295 variables, 1/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/295 variables, 1/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/295 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/295 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 295/295 variables, and 142 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved in 10634 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 198/198 constraints, Known Traps: 27/27 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/102 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 8/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 27/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 192/294 variables, 102/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 198/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 54 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 48 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 5/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 0/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/295 variables, 1/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:12:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/295 variables, 2/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/295 variables, 0/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/295 variables, 0/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 295/295 variables, and 347 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved in 14208 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 198/198 constraints, Known Traps: 34/34 constraints]
After SMT, in 24991ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 25011ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 102/159 places, 199/307 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 25387 ms. Remains : 102/159 places, 199/307 transitions.
Support contains 62 out of 102 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-24 03:12:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 49 ms
[2024-05-24 03:12:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2024-05-24 03:12:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 199 transitions.
Support contains 53 out of 102 places (down from 62) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (2687 resets) in 2145 ms. (18 steps per ms) remains 24/41 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (39 resets) in 59 ms. (66 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (39 resets) in 27 ms. (142 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (37 resets) in 31 ms. (125 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (36 resets) in 34 ms. (114 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (38 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (38 resets) in 34 ms. (114 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (36 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (39 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (39 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (37 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (38 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (36 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (37 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (36 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (36 resets) in 8 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (38 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (38 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (36 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (40 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (39 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (35 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (36 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (41 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 22/24 properties
[2024-05-24 03:12:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 193 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:12:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:12:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 35/67 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 35/102 variables, 8/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 192/294 variables, 102/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/295 variables, 1/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/295 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/295 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 295/295 variables, and 115 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved in 523 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp5 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 35/67 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 21 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:12:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 4/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 21 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:12:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 21 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 35/102 variables, 8/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 21 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 53 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 52 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp3 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp4 is UNSAT
[2024-05-24 03:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 40 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp3 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp4 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 20/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 19 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:12:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 45 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 41 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 46 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 7/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 19 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:12:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 3/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 19 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:12:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 3/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 19 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:12:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 3/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 19 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:12:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 53 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 2/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 192/294 variables, 102/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 19/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 0/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 1/295 variables, 1/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 19 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:12:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/295 variables, 1/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/295 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/295 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 19 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 295/295 variables, and 179 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 19 unsolved in 3378 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 19/22 constraints, Known Traps: 45/45 constraints]
After SMT, in 3912ms problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 19 unsolved
Fused 19 Parikh solutions to 15 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 17 properties in 873 ms.
Support contains 3 out of 102 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 199/199 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 132 edges and 102 vertex of which 10 / 102 are part of one of the 5 SCC in 2 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 17 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 17 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 416 edges and 97 vertex of which 95 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 95 transition count 178
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 91 transition count 174
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 91 transition count 172
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 88 transition count 172
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 56 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 2 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 56 transition count 109
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 56 transition count 108
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 91 place count 49 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 49 transition count 94
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 49 transition count 85
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 109 place count 47 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 47 transition count 79
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 113 place count 45 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 45 transition count 75
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 45 transition count 69
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 125 place count 43 transition count 67
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -40
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 137 place count 37 transition count 107
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 37 transition count 106
Free-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 37 transition count 104
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 142 place count 35 transition count 104
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 35 transition count 102
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 145 place count 35 transition count 215
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 147 place count 34 transition count 214
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 3 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 7 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 34 transition count 211
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 7 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 151 place count 33 transition count 171
Iterating global reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 33 transition count 171
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 7 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 153 place count 32 transition count 168
Iterating global reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 32 transition count 168
Ensure Unique test removed 15 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 15 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 32 transition count 153
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 10 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 10 transitions
Iterating global reduction 8 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 179 place count 32 transition count 153
Applied a total of 179 rules in 89 ms. Remains 32 /102 variables (removed 70) and now considering 153/199 (removed 46) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 89 ms. Remains : 32/102 places, 153/199 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 2753 steps (644 resets) in 63 ms. (43 steps per ms) remains 0/2 properties
Successfully simplified 3 atomic propositions for a total of 13 simplifications.
[2024-05-24 03:12:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-05-24 03:12:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2024-05-24 03:12:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 199 transitions.
Support contains 45 out of 102 places (down from 49) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 7 stabilizing places and 10 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 199/199 transitions.
Discarding 39 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 39 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 63 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 0 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 63 transition count 124
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 86 place count 55 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 55 transition count 108
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 55 transition count 99
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 106 place count 52 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 52 transition count 90
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 112 place count 49 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 49 transition count 84
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 49 transition count 75
Applied a total of 124 rules in 9 ms. Remains 49 /102 variables (removed 53) and now considering 75/199 (removed 124) transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:12:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 72 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 49 cols
[2024-05-24 03:12:55] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-24 03:12:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 03:12:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 72 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:12:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:12:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 03:12:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 47 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 101 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 74 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:12:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 72 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:12:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:12:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/49 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:12:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 71/120 variables, 49/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/121 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 121/121 variables, and 61 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved in 1148 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/49 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 3/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 71/120 variables, 49/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 74/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 1/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/121 variables, 0/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 121/121 variables, and 138 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved in 1742 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 2905ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2906ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 49/102 places, 75/199 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3018 ms. Remains : 49/102 places, 75/199 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:12:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-24 03:12:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 03:12:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 75 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:12:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 03:12:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 03:12:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15146240698029547097.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 03:12:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15875769405865226027.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15146240698029547097.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15875769405865226027.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,484794,0.046799,4900,2,672,5,6755,6,0,267,6022,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AX(FALSE))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(FALSE))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 0,0,0.053493,4900,1,0,6,6755,7,1,464,6022,1
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLCardinality-2024-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 199/199 transitions.
Discarding 39 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 39 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 63 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 0 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 63 transition count 124
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 86 place count 55 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 55 transition count 108
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 55 transition count 99
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 106 place count 52 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 52 transition count 90
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 112 place count 49 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 49 transition count 84
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 49 transition count 75
Applied a total of 124 rules in 12 ms. Remains 49 /102 variables (removed 53) and now considering 75/199 (removed 124) transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:12:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 72 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:12:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:12:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 03:12:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 72 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:12:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:12:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 03:12:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 54 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 101 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 74 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:12:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 72 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:12:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:12:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/49 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:12:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 71/120 variables, 49/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/121 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 121/121 variables, and 61 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved in 1209 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/49 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:12:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:12:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 3/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 71/120 variables, 49/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 74/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 1/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/121 variables, 0/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 121/121 variables, and 138 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved in 1788 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 3020ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3021ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 49/102 places, 75/199 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3135 ms. Remains : 49/102 places, 75/199 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 75 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15555262405153762164.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11325868047344437118.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15555262405153762164.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11325868047344437118.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,484794,0.032991,4976,2,672,5,6755,6,0,267,6022,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX(TRUE))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(TRUE)))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t15, t17, t19, Intersection with reachab...227
(forward)formula 0,0,0.104648,7880,1,0,127,21759,161,62,1843,16985,152
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLCardinality-2024-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 199/199 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 135 edges and 102 vertex of which 10 / 102 are part of one of the 5 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 60 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 60 transition count 124
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 82 place count 51 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 51 transition count 106
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 51 transition count 96
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 104 place count 48 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 48 transition count 87
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 109 place count 46 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 46 transition count 83
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 46 transition count 77
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 3 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 46 transition count 74
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 44 transition count 72
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 125 place count 43 transition count 71
Applied a total of 125 rules in 20 ms. Remains 43 /102 variables (removed 59) and now considering 71/199 (removed 128) transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 64 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 43 cols
[2024-05-24 03:13:01] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 03:13:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 64 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:13:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:13:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 40 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 85 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-24 03:13:01] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 12 ms returned []
Running 57 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 64 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:13:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/43 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:13:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:13:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:13:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 12 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:13:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 63/106 variables, 43/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/106 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 106/107 variables, and 56 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved in 933 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 43/43 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/43 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:13:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 1/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 63/106 variables, 43/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 57/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/106 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 106/107 variables, and 114 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved in 827 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 43/43 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 1785ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1787ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 43/102 places, 71/199 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1910 ms. Remains : 43/102 places, 71/199 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 71 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
RANDOM walk for 19359 steps (1951 resets) in 94 ms. (203 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLCardinality-2024-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2024-05-24 03:13:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality17740156244216314241.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality3221718843005709494.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality17740156244216314241.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality3221718843005709494.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 199/199 transitions.
Discarding 35 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 35 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 67 transition count 130
Iterating global reduction 0 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 67 transition count 130
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 60 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 60 transition count 116
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 60 transition count 107
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 95 place count 58 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 58 transition count 101
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 99 place count 56 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 56 transition count 97
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 56 transition count 91
Applied a total of 107 rules in 20 ms. Remains 56 /102 variables (removed 46) and now considering 91/199 (removed 108) transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 56 cols
[2024-05-24 03:13:03] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 03:13:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:13:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:13:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 03:13:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 56 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 95 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 90 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:13:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:13:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/56 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 8/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:13:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:13:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:13:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:13:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:13:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 85/141 variables, 56/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/142 variables, 1/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/142 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 142/142 variables, and 73 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 1907 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 56/56 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/56 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 8/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 85/141 variables, 56/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 90/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/142 variables, 1/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/142 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 142/142 variables, and 163 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 2048 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 56/56 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 3982ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3983ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 56/102 places, 91/199 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4098 ms. Remains : 56/102 places, 91/199 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 91 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3521742462466755888.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17311351105866909422.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3521742462466755888.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17311351105866909422.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,785142,0.106665,8516,2,1858,5,22408,6,0,305,16508,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((EX(AG(EF((p55==1)))) * ((p58==0)||(p96==1))) U ((AX(AG((p20==1))) * EG((p84==0))) * (p75==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(((FwdU(Init,(EX(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U (p55==1)))))) * ((p58==0)||(p96==1)))) * (p75==0)) * !(EX(!(!(E(TRUE...195
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t19, t21, t23, t24, t...302
(forward)formula 0,0,0.919626,36404,1,0,208,189131,214,98,2294,164112,240
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLCardinality-2024-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 199/199 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 121 edges and 102 vertex of which 10 / 102 are part of one of the 5 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 63 transition count 130
Iterating global reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 63 transition count 130
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 74 place count 56 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 56 transition count 116
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 56 transition count 106
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 92 place count 55 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 55 transition count 103
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 94 place count 54 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 54 transition count 101
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 54 transition count 98
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 3 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 54 transition count 95
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 52 transition count 93
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 51 transition count 92
Applied a total of 106 rules in 22 ms. Remains 51 /102 variables (removed 51) and now considering 92/199 (removed 107) transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 85 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 51 cols
[2024-05-24 03:13:08] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 03:13:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 85 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:13:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:13:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 44 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 73 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-24 03:13:08] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 12 ms returned []
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 85 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:13:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/51 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 84/135 variables, 51/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 135/136 variables, and 64 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 1178 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 51/51 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/51 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 1/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 84/135 variables, 51/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 78/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 0/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 135/136 variables, and 145 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 1730 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 51/51 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 2933ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2934ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 51/102 places, 92/199 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3045 ms. Remains : 51/102 places, 92/199 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15990633282045610281.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1342218183510620929.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15990633282045610281.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1342218183510620929.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,525316,0.106165,8504,2,1414,5,21343,6,0,284,21733,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(((A((p37==1) U (p57==1)) * (p138==1)) * ((p85==0)||(p129==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(((!((E(!((p57==1)) U (!((p37==1)) * !((p57==1)))) + EG(!((p57==1))))) * (p138==...197
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...285
(forward)formula 0,0,3.52217,132404,1,0,487,828333,210,235,2141,776662,538
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLCardinality-2024-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 199/199 transitions.
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 70 transition count 138
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 70 transition count 138
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 64 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 64 transition count 126
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 64 transition count 121
Applied a total of 81 rules in 2 ms. Remains 64 /102 variables (removed 38) and now considering 121/199 (removed 78) transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 118 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 118 rows 64 cols
[2024-05-24 03:13:15] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 03:13:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 118 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:13:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:13:15] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 03:13:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 63 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 116 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 120 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 118 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:13:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:13:15] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/64 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:13:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:13:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:13:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:13:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:13:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:13:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 3/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 117/181 variables, 64/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/182 variables, 1/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/182 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 182/182 variables, and 80 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 2956 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/64 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 6/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:13:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:13:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:13:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 3/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 117/181 variables, 64/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 120/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:13:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:13:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:13:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 3/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 0/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/182 variables, 1/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 0/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/182 variables, 0/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 182/182 variables, and 206 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 4970 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints]
After SMT, in 7969ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7971ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 64/102 places, 121/199 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8089 ms. Remains : 64/102 places, 121/199 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 121 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6322116559001514754.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5991968160427372507.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6322116559001514754.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5991968160427372507.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.40109e+06,0.344682,17164,2,3066,5,55408,6,0,373,61470,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EF(AX((p31==0))) * E(A((p102==0) U (p9==0)) U (EF((p49==0)) + E(!(EF((p26==0))) U E((p97==0) U (p153==0)))))) * AG((p3==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(Init * !(E(TRUE U !(EX(!((p31==0)))))))] = FALSE * [(Init * !(E(!((E(!((p9==0)) U (!((p102==0)) * !((p9==0))...309
(forward)formula 0,0,0.349048,17428,1,0,8,55408,9,2,378,61470,1
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLCardinality-2024-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 199/199 transitions.
Discarding 34 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 34 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 68 transition count 134
Iterating global reduction 0 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 68 transition count 134
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 76 place count 60 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 60 transition count 118
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 60 transition count 109
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 95 place count 58 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 58 transition count 103
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 99 place count 56 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 56 transition count 99
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 56 transition count 93
Applied a total of 107 rules in 9 ms. Remains 56 /102 variables (removed 46) and now considering 93/199 (removed 106) transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 56 cols
[2024-05-24 03:13:23] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 29 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 03:13:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:13:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:13:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 03:13:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 64 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 101 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 92 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:13:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:13:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/56 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:13:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:13:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:13:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 89/145 variables, 56/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/146 variables, 1/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/146 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 146/146 variables, and 69 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved in 1549 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 56/56 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 92/92 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/56 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 4/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 3/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 89/145 variables, 56/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 92/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/146 variables, 1/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:13:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:13:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 2/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 0/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/146 variables, 0/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 146/146 variables, and 170 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved in 3356 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 56/56 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 92/92 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints]
After SMT, in 4924ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4925ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 56/102 places, 93/199 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5035 ms. Remains : 56/102 places, 93/199 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 93 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5297112067044010502.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9456993586787460713.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5297112067044010502.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9456993586787460713.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,923654,0.096817,7724,2,1023,5,18596,6,0,313,17545,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EX(EX(((p9==0)||(p109==1)))) * AX(((EF((p6==1)) + (p150==1)) + (p32==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(EX(((p9==0)||(p109==1))))))] = FALSE * [(((EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !((p32==0))) * !((p15...196
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t20, t22, t24, t26, ...303
(forward)formula 0,0,0.417955,19260,1,0,185,93651,207,86,2306,68052,213
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLCardinality-2024-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 199/199 transitions.
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 66 transition count 130
Iterating global reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 66 transition count 130
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 78 place count 60 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 60 transition count 118
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 60 transition count 113
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 91 place count 58 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 58 transition count 107
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 95 place count 56 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 56 transition count 103
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 56 transition count 97
Applied a total of 103 rules in 8 ms. Remains 56 /102 variables (removed 46) and now considering 97/199 (removed 102) transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 94 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 94 rows 56 cols
[2024-05-24 03:13:29] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 9 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 104 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 03:13:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 94 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:13:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:13:29] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 03:13:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 51 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 158 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 96 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 94 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:13:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:13:29] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/56 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:13:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:13:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:13:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 93/149 variables, 56/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/150 variables, 1/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/150 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 150/150 variables, and 69 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved in 1688 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 56/56 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/56 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:13:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 93/149 variables, 56/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 96/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/150 variables, 1/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/150 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 150/150 variables, and 166 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved in 2485 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 56/56 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 4205ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4206ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 56/102 places, 97/199 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4372 ms. Remains : 56/102 places, 97/199 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7087367967631009485.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5315742528286017688.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7087367967631009485.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5315742528286017688.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.12947e+06,0.113066,8816,2,1616,5,22146,6,0,317,20752,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AG((EG((p59==1)) + E(((p86==1)&&(p54==1)) U ((p134==0)||(p121==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !((EG((p59==1)) + E(((p86==1)&&(p54==1)) U ((p134==0)||(p121==1))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t22, t...277
(forward)formula 0,0,1.03984,42244,1,0,221,216356,222,103,2350,190819,276
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLCardinality-2024-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 199/199 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 130 edges and 102 vertex of which 10 / 102 are part of one of the 5 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 63 transition count 130
Iterating global reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 63 transition count 130
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 55 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 55 transition count 114
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 55 transition count 105
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 94 place count 53 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 53 transition count 99
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 98 place count 51 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 51 transition count 95
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 51 transition count 89
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 3 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 51 transition count 86
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 49 transition count 84
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 48 transition count 83
Applied a total of 114 rules in 20 ms. Remains 48 /102 variables (removed 54) and now considering 83/199 (removed 116) transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:34] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 76 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 76 rows 48 cols
[2024-05-24 03:13:34] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 29 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 03:13:34] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 76 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:13:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:13:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 44 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 90 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-24 03:13:34] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 11 ms returned []
Running 69 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:34] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 76 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:13:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/48 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 75/123 variables, 48/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/123 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 123/124 variables, and 60 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved in 899 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 48/48 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 69/69 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/48 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 75/123 variables, 48/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 69/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/123 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 123/124 variables, and 130 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved in 1099 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 48/48 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 69/69 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 2020ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2021ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 48/102 places, 83/199 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2146 ms. Remains : 48/102 places, 83/199 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 83 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9868541814795814135.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2392235505626576543.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9868541814795814135.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2392235505626576543.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,369688,0.097934,8168,2,1007,5,19986,6,0,263,18175,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((EF((p23==0)) + (p137==0)) + (p29==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((p29==1))) * !((p137==0))) * !(E(TRUE U (p23==0))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t19, t20, t33...290
(forward)formula 0,1,0.296592,14768,1,0,156,63117,179,65,1892,43931,171
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLCardinality-2024-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 199/199 transitions.
Discarding 38 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 38 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 64 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 0 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 64 transition count 126
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 83 place count 57 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 57 transition count 112
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 57 transition count 103
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 101 place count 55 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 55 transition count 97
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 105 place count 53 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 53 transition count 93
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 53 transition count 87
Applied a total of 113 rules in 2 ms. Remains 53 /102 variables (removed 49) and now considering 87/199 (removed 112) transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 53 cols
[2024-05-24 03:13:37] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 03:13:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:13:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:13:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 03:13:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 50 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 106 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 86 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:13:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:13:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:13:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:13:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 83/136 variables, 53/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/137 variables, 1/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/137 variables, 1/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/137 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 137/137 variables, and 66 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved in 1947 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 86/86 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 3/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 83/136 variables, 53/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 86/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/137 variables, 1/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/137 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 137/137 variables, and 156 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved in 2437 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 86/86 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 4405ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4406ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 53/102 places, 87/199 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4514 ms. Remains : 53/102 places, 87/199 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 87 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9751893703849559188.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3314102499789767734.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9751893703849559188.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3314102499789767734.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,596332,0.03623,5060,2,874,5,7721,6,0,295,6019,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(EX(AG((p138==1)))) * AX((EG(((p86==0)||(p110==1))) * ((p140==0)||(p72==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(TRUE U EX(!(E(TRUE U !((p138==1))))))))] = FALSE * ([(EY(Init) * !(EG(((p86==0)||(p110==1)))))] = ...212
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t19, t21, t23, t25, t...257
(forward)formula 0,0,1.23494,56708,1,0,308,326736,201,154,2145,276685,364
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLCardinality-2024-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 199/199 transitions.
Discarding 39 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 39 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 63 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 0 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 63 transition count 124
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 86 place count 55 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 55 transition count 108
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 55 transition count 99
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 106 place count 52 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 52 transition count 90
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 112 place count 49 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 49 transition count 84
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 49 transition count 75
Applied a total of 124 rules in 2 ms. Remains 49 /102 variables (removed 53) and now considering 75/199 (removed 124) transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 72 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 49 cols
[2024-05-24 03:13:42] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 03:13:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 72 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:13:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:13:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 03:13:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 48 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 77 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 74 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 72 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:13:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:13:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/49 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:13:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:13:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 71/120 variables, 49/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/121 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 121/121 variables, and 61 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved in 1128 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/49 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 3/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 71/120 variables, 49/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 74/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 1/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/121 variables, 0/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 121/121 variables, and 138 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved in 1735 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 2879ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2880ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 49/102 places, 75/199 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2960 ms. Remains : 49/102 places, 75/199 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 75 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15905189685939897368.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality536207110568294452.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15905189685939897368.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality536207110568294452.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,484794,0.033544,4980,2,672,5,6755,6,0,267,6022,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(TRUE)
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * TRUE)] != FALSE
(forward)formula 0,1,0.034361,4980,1,0,6,6755,7,1,355,6022,1
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLCardinality-2024-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 199/199 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 134 edges and 102 vertex of which 10 / 102 are part of one of the 5 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 60 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 60 transition count 124
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 82 place count 51 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 51 transition count 106
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 51 transition count 96
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 103 place count 49 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 49 transition count 90
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 107 place count 47 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 47 transition count 86
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 47 transition count 80
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 3 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 47 transition count 77
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 45 transition count 75
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 44 transition count 74
Applied a total of 123 rules in 19 ms. Remains 44 /102 variables (removed 58) and now considering 74/199 (removed 125) transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 67 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 67 rows 44 cols
[2024-05-24 03:13:46] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 03:13:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 67 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:13:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:13:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 39 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 73 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-24 03:13:46] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 12 ms returned []
Running 60 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 67 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:13:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/44 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 5/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 66/110 variables, 44/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/110 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 110/111 variables, and 58 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved in 811 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 44/44 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/44 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 5/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:13:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 66/110 variables, 44/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 60/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/110 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 110/111 variables, and 119 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved in 913 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 44/44 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 1756ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1757ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 44/102 places, 74/199 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1868 ms. Remains : 44/102 places, 74/199 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 74 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality17956632152912840865.gal : 11 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality13319248632725747662.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality17956632152912840865.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality13319248632725747662.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-reach command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...330
RANDOM walk for 30233 steps (3050 resets) in 87 ms. (343 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLCardinality-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 199/199 transitions.
Discarding 35 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 35 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 67 transition count 131
Iterating global reduction 0 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 67 transition count 131
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 60 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 60 transition count 117
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 60 transition count 109
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 94 place count 58 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 58 transition count 103
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 98 place count 56 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 56 transition count 99
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 56 transition count 94
Applied a total of 105 rules in 2 ms. Remains 56 /102 variables (removed 46) and now considering 94/199 (removed 105) transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 56 cols
[2024-05-24 03:13:47] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 03:13:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:13:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:13:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 03:13:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 47 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 99 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 93 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:13:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:13:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/56 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 8/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 89/145 variables, 56/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/146 variables, 1/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/146 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 146/146 variables, and 69 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved in 1747 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 56/56 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 93/93 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/56 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 8/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 2/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 3/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 89/145 variables, 56/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 93/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/146 variables, 1/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 0/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/146 variables, 0/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 146/146 variables, and 167 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved in 2789 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 56/56 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 93/93 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 4563ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4564ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 56/102 places, 94/199 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4667 ms. Remains : 56/102 places, 94/199 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 94 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5834950211250439691.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17714487628099598930.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5834950211250439691.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17714487628099598930.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,940419,0.058018,5892,2,1227,5,10831,6,0,312,9794,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((EG(((EF((p49==1)) + (p130==0)) + (p87==1))) + AX(((p155==0)&&(p17==1)))) + EF(((p116==0)&&(p43==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((p116==0)&&(p43==1))))) * !(EG(((E(TRUE U (p49==1)) + (p130==0)) + (p87==1)...197
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t20, t22, t24, t...282
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,2.53876,102364,1,0,348,654725,217,197,2373,550243,371
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLCardinality-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 199/199 transitions.
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 65 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 0 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 65 transition count 128
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 80 place count 59 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 59 transition count 116
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 59 transition count 111
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 93 place count 57 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 57 transition count 105
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 97 place count 55 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 55 transition count 101
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 55 transition count 95
Applied a total of 105 rules in 7 ms. Remains 55 /102 variables (removed 47) and now considering 95/199 (removed 104) transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 92 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 55 cols
[2024-05-24 03:13:55] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 03:13:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 92 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:13:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:13:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 03:13:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 47 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 75 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 94 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 92 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:13:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:13:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/55 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:13:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:13:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 91/146 variables, 55/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/147 variables, 1/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/147 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 147/147 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved in 1507 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 55/55 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 94/94 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/55 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:13:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:13:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 2/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 91/146 variables, 55/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 94/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/147 variables, 1/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/147 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 147/147 variables, and 163 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved in 2439 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 55/55 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 94/94 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 3969ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3970ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 55/102 places, 95/199 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4053 ms. Remains : 55/102 places, 95/199 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 95 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:13:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12795133047156310800.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12211256823646929917.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12795133047156310800.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12211256823646929917.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,847107,0.082317,7224,2,1242,5,16158,6,0,311,15174,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EX(AG((((p35==0)&&(p126==0))||((p121==1)&&((p66==0)||(p1==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(E(TRUE U !((((p35==0)&&(p126==0))||((p121==1)&&((p66==0)||(p1==1))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t22, t...277
(forward)formula 0,1,0.427028,20908,1,0,166,95486,208,76,2306,68814,201
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLCardinality-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
[2024-05-24 03:13:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-24 03:13:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Total runtime 96439 ms.
BK_STOP 1716520439823
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="HealthRecord-PT-11"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is HealthRecord-PT-11, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r180-tall-171640604200777"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/HealthRecord-PT-11.tgz
mv HealthRecord-PT-11 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;