Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r180-tall-171640604100753.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is HealthRecord-PT-08, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r180-tall-171640604100753
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 556K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.9K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 78K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.8K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 42K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Apr 22 14:48 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K Apr 22 14:48 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K Apr 22 14:48 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Apr 22 14:48 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K Apr 12 20:18 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 159K Apr 12 20:18 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.0K Apr 12 20:17 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 81K Apr 12 20:17 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Apr 22 14:48 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 22 14:48 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 18 16:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 68K May 18 16:42 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2023-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716519860095

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=HealthRecord-PT-08
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-24 03:04:21] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-24 03:04:21] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-24 03:04:21] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 72 ms
[2024-05-24 03:04:21] [INFO ] Transformed 156 places.
[2024-05-24 03:04:21] [INFO ] Transformed 326 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:04:21] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-24 03:04:21] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 156 places and 326 transitions and 855 arcs in 170 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 15 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 3 formulas.
Ensure Unique test removed 26 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 26 transitions.
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 76 out of 156 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 156/156 places, 300/300 transitions.
Discarding 50 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 50 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 106 transition count 204
Iterating global reduction 0 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 106 transition count 204
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 101 place count 105 transition count 202
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 105 transition count 202
Applied a total of 102 rules in 25 ms. Remains 105 /156 variables (removed 51) and now considering 202/300 (removed 98) transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:04:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 194 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 105 cols
[2024-05-24 03:04:21] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 19 ms
[2024-05-24 03:04:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 217 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 03:04:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 194 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:04:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:04:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 03:04:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 116 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 361 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 201 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:04:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 194 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:04:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:04:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/105 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 8/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:04:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 98 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:04:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:04:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:04:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:04:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:04:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:04:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:04:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:04:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 39 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:04:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:04:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:04:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:04:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:04:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:04:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:04:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:04:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:04:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:04:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:04:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 20/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:04:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:04:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:04:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:04:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:04:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 5/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:04:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 50 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:04:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:04:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:04:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 4/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:04:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 56 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:04:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:04:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 3/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 193/298 variables, 105/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:04:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 45 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 1/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 0/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/299 variables, 1/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/299 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/299 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 299/299 variables, and 153 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved in 10583 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 105/105 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 201/201 constraints, Known Traps: 33/33 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/105 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 8/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 193/298 variables, 105/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 201/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:04:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 1/354 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:04:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:04:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 47 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:04:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 3/357 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 0/357 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/299 variables, 1/358 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:04:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:04:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:04:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/299 variables, 3/361 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/299 variables, 0/361 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:04:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/299 variables, 1/362 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:04:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:04:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:04:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/299 variables, 3/365 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/299 variables, 0/365 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/299 variables, 0/365 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 299/299 variables, and 365 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved in 23997 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 105/105 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 201/201 constraints, Known Traps: 44/44 constraints]
After SMT, in 34729ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 34750ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 105/156 places, 202/300 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 35157 ms. Remains : 105/156 places, 202/300 transitions.
Support contains 76 out of 105 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-24 03:04:56] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2024-05-24 03:04:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 50 ms
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2024-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-24 03:04:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2024-05-24 03:04:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
Support contains 71 out of 105 places (down from 76) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (2249 resets) in 2284 ms. (17 steps per ms) remains 14/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (293 resets) in 342 ms. (116 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (292 resets) in 317 ms. (125 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (297 resets) in 94 ms. (421 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (301 resets) in 127 ms. (312 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (300 resets) in 77 ms. (512 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (302 resets) in 114 ms. (347 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (297 resets) in 49 ms. (800 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (296 resets) in 48 ms. (816 steps per ms) remains 13/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (295 resets) in 77 ms. (512 steps per ms) remains 13/13 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (290 resets) in 48 ms. (816 steps per ms) remains 13/13 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (289 resets) in 45 ms. (869 steps per ms) remains 13/13 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (295 resets) in 39 ms. (1000 steps per ms) remains 13/13 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (292 resets) in 90 ms. (439 steps per ms) remains 13/13 properties
[2024-05-24 03:04:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 194 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:04:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:04:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 43/60 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 2/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 45/105 variables, 8/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 61 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 44 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 44 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 60 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 12/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 2/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 193/298 variables, 105/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 2/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 1/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:05:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:05:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 2/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:05:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 1/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 1/299 variables, 1/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/299 variables, 0/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/299 variables, 0/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 299/299 variables, and 143 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved in 1897 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 105/105 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps: 23/23 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 43/60 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 7/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:05:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 45/105 variables, 8/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 16/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:05:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:05:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 2/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:05:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:05:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 45 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 2/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:05:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:05:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 41 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:05:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 2/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 193/298 variables, 105/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 13/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 1/299 variables, 1/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/299 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/299 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 299/299 variables, and 164 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved in 1097 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 105/105 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps: 31/31 constraints]
After SMT, in 3004ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
Fused 13 Parikh solutions to 9 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 10 properties in 851 ms.
Support contains 3 out of 105 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 202/202 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 137 edges and 105 vertex of which 12 / 105 are part of one of the 6 SCC in 3 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 21 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 21 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 428 edges and 99 vertex of which 72 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 27 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 27 places :
Also discarding 16 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 16 transitions
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 62 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 62 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 62 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 72 transition count 103
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 96 place count 40 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 1 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 40 transition count 71
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 1 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 40 transition count 66
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 35 transition count 66
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 146 place count 27 transition count 55
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 27 transition count 55
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 27 transition count 46
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 165 place count 25 transition count 43
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 167 place count 25 transition count 43
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 170 place count 25 transition count 40
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 171 place count 24 transition count 39
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 172 place count 24 transition count 39
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 175 place count 24 transition count 36
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 179 place count 22 transition count 34
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 22 transition count 33
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 181 place count 21 transition count 32
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 184 place count 19 transition count 31
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 7 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 7 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 191 place count 19 transition count 24
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 193 place count 18 transition count 23
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 194 place count 17 transition count 22
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 195 place count 17 transition count 22
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 196 place count 17 transition count 21
Free-agglomeration rule applied 3 times.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 199 place count 17 transition count 18
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 202 place count 14 transition count 18
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 203 place count 14 transition count 18
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 204 place count 14 transition count 17
Applied a total of 204 rules in 55 ms. Remains 14 /105 variables (removed 91) and now considering 17/202 (removed 185) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 55 ms. Remains : 14/105 places, 17/202 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 278 steps (44 resets) in 5 ms. (46 steps per ms) remains 0/3 properties
[2024-05-24 03:05:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-24 03:05:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-24 03:05:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
Computed a total of 9 stabilizing places and 15 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 202/202 transitions.
Discarding 44 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 44 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 61 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 0 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 61 transition count 119
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 96 place count 53 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 53 transition count 102
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 53 transition count 93
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 116 place count 50 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 50 transition count 85
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 50 transition count 82
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 124 place count 48 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 48 transition count 78
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 48 transition count 72
Applied a total of 132 rules in 6 ms. Remains 48 /105 variables (removed 57) and now considering 72/202 (removed 130) transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:05:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 69 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 69 rows 48 cols
[2024-05-24 03:05:02] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-24 03:05:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 03:05:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 69 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:05:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:05:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 03:05:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 46 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 84 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 71 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:05:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 69 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:05:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:05:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/48 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:05:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:05:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 68/116 variables, 48/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/117 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/117 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 117/117 variables, and 60 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved in 1129 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 48/48 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/48 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:05:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 68/116 variables, 48/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 71/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/117 variables, 1/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/117 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 117/117 variables, and 132 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved in 1604 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 48/48 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 2764ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2766ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 48/105 places, 72/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2856 ms. Remains : 48/105 places, 72/202 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:05:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 03:05:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 03:05:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 72 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:05:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 03:05:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 03:05:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13170241773633301337.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 03:05:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17464976859851405938.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13170241773633301337.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17464976859851405938.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,369612,0.092771,7576,2,1847,5,20420,6,0,260,12895,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG(EF(AX(FALSE))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(E(TRUE U !(EX(!(FALSE)))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t12, t13, t15, t17, t19, Intersection with reachable at...222
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,2.56917,92868,1,0,255,564042,172,172,1970,487848,315
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2024-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 202/202 transitions.
Discarding 39 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 39 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 66 transition count 129
Iterating global reduction 0 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 66 transition count 129
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 85 place count 59 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 59 transition count 115
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 59 transition count 107
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 102 place count 57 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 57 transition count 101
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 106 place count 55 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 55 transition count 97
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 55 transition count 92
Applied a total of 113 rules in 12 ms. Remains 55 /105 variables (removed 50) and now considering 92/202 (removed 110) transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:05:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 55 cols
[2024-05-24 03:05:08] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 03:05:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 03:05:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:05:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:05:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 03:05:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 53 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 92 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 91 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:05:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:05:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:05:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/55 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:05:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:05:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 185 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:05:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:05:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 88/143 variables, 55/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/144 variables, 1/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/144 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 144/144 variables, and 69 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved in 2075 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 55/55 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/55 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 2/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 88/143 variables, 55/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 91/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/144 variables, 1/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/144 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 144/144 variables, and 162 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved in 2260 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 55/55 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 4359ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4360ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 55/105 places, 92/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4464 ms. Remains : 55/105 places, 92/202 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:05:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-24 03:05:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 03:05:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:05:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 03:05:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 03:05:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10875676334010803817.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 03:05:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12788834412266641930.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10875676334010803817.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12788834412266641930.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.16422e+06,0.155977,10616,2,1821,5,31559,6,0,308,25623,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((E(EG(((p153==0)||(p49==1))) U (p41==1)) + E((EX(((p129==0)||(p85==1))) + (p75==1)) U !(AF((p127==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E((EX(((p129==0)||(p85==1))) + (p75==1)) U !(!(EG(!((p127==0)))))))) * !(E(EG(((p153==0)|...189
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t13, t14, t16, t17, t19, t21, t23, t25, t26, t29, t...287
(forward)formula 0,0,3.10526,102832,1,0,407,616944,217,245,2221,588908,507
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2024-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 202/202 transitions.
Discarding 41 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 41 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 64 transition count 125
Iterating global reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 64 transition count 125
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 88 place count 58 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 58 transition count 113
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 58 transition count 104
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 104 place count 57 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 57 transition count 101
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 106 place count 56 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 56 transition count 99
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 56 transition count 96
Applied a total of 110 rules in 6 ms. Remains 56 /105 variables (removed 49) and now considering 96/202 (removed 106) transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:05:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 93 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 56 cols
[2024-05-24 03:05:15] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-24 03:05:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 03:05:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 93 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:05:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:05:15] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 03:05:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 58 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 102 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 95 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:05:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 93 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:05:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:05:15] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/56 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:05:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:05:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:05:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 92/148 variables, 56/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/149 variables, 1/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/149 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 149/149 variables, and 69 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved in 2086 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 56/56 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 95/95 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/56 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:05:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:05:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 2/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 92/148 variables, 56/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 95/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/149 variables, 1/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/149 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 149/149 variables, and 166 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved in 2554 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 56/56 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 95/95 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 4666ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4667ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 56/105 places, 96/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4776 ms. Remains : 56/105 places, 96/202 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:05:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 03:05:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 03:05:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 96 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:05:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 03:05:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 03:05:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11885969980412370857.gal : 99 ms
[2024-05-24 03:05:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13801158908951553554.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11885969980412370857.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13801158908951553554.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,640801,0.048845,5636,2,761,5,8972,6,0,316,8590,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((EF((AG(((p27==0)&&(p110==1))) + (((p145==0)&&(p122==1))&&(p123==0)))) * AF(((p0==0)||(p110==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U (!(E(TRUE U !(((p27==0)&&(p110==1))))) + (((p145==0)&&(p122==1))&&(p123==0))))))] = FAL...209
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t9, t10, t11, t12, t14, t15, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t23, t24, t26, ...278
(forward)formula 0,1,0.321063,16188,1,0,174,66482,221,88,2312,49586,217
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2024-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 202/202 transitions.
Discarding 35 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 35 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 70 transition count 136
Iterating global reduction 0 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 70 transition count 136
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 65 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 65 transition count 126
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 65 transition count 117
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 90 place count 64 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 64 transition count 114
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 92 place count 63 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 63 transition count 112
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 63 transition count 109
Applied a total of 96 rules in 15 ms. Remains 63 /105 variables (removed 42) and now considering 109/202 (removed 93) transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:05:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 105 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 105 rows 63 cols
[2024-05-24 03:05:20] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 03:05:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 03:05:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 105 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:05:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:05:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 03:05:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 59 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 98 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 108 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:05:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 105 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:05:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:05:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/63 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 8/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:05:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:05:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:05:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:05:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 4/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:05:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 104/167 variables, 63/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/168 variables, 1/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/168 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 168/168 variables, and 79 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved in 2542 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 63/63 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 108/108 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/63 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 8/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 5/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:05:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:05:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 2/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:05:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:05:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:05:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 3/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:05:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:05:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 2/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:05:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:05:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 2/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:05:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 1/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 104/167 variables, 63/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 108/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 0/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 1/168 variables, 1/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/168 variables, 0/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 168/168 variables, and 197 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved in 4965 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 63/63 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 108/108 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints]
After SMT, in 7548ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7549ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/105 places, 109/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7664 ms. Remains : 63/105 places, 109/202 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:05:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-24 03:05:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 03:05:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 109 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:05:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 03:05:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 03:05:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6808143560492628459.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 03:05:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5421772495946184219.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6808143560492628459.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5421772495946184219.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.82875e+06,0.154396,10720,2,1825,5,27512,6,0,355,41223,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(A(AF(!(EF(((p80==0)||(p154==1))))) U ((AF(AG(((p91==0)||(p90==1)))) + EG((p135==1))) + (AF((p76==0)) * (EX((p74==1)) + A(((p18==0)||(p...226
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((Init * !(EG(!(((!(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((p91==0)||(p90==1)))))))) + EG((p135==1))) + (!(EG(!((p76==0)))) * (EX(...818
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t...393
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,5.84666,189292,1,0,683,1.09808e+06,273,352,2689,1.17583e+06,787
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2024-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 202/202 transitions.
Discarding 41 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 41 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 64 transition count 125
Iterating global reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 64 transition count 125
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 88 place count 58 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 58 transition count 113
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 58 transition count 104
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 104 place count 57 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 57 transition count 101
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 106 place count 56 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 56 transition count 99
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 56 transition count 96
Applied a total of 110 rules in 13 ms. Remains 56 /105 variables (removed 49) and now considering 96/202 (removed 106) transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:05:34] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 93 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 56 cols
[2024-05-24 03:05:34] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 03:05:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 03:05:34] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 93 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:05:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:05:34] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 03:05:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 56 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 92 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 95 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:05:34] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 93 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:05:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:05:34] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/56 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:05:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:05:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 92/148 variables, 56/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/149 variables, 1/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/149 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 149/149 variables, and 68 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved in 1675 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 56/56 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 95/95 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/56 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:05:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:05:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 2/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:05:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:05:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:05:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 3/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 92/148 variables, 56/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 95/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/149 variables, 1/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/149 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 149/149 variables, and 168 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved in 2886 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 56/56 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 95/95 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 4587ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4588ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 56/105 places, 96/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4693 ms. Remains : 56/105 places, 96/202 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:05:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-24 03:05:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-24 03:05:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 96 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:05:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 03:05:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 03:05:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12667780549472836987.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 03:05:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10000926057791626421.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12667780549472836987.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10000926057791626421.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,640801,0.04651,5376,2,677,5,7975,6,0,316,7721,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A((p28==1) U AX((E((p109==0) U (p105==1)) + (p130==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((EY((FwdU(Init,!(!(EX(!((E((p109==0) U (p105==1)) + (p130==1))))))) * !((p28==1)))) * !((p130==1))) * !(E((p1...263
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t18, t19, t21, t22, t24, t26, t...277
(forward)formula 0,0,1.34332,50184,1,0,294,284627,222,182,2259,252837,415
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2024-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 202/202 transitions.
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 73 transition count 142
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 73 transition count 142
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 68 transition count 131
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 68 transition count 131
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 68 transition count 126
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 80 place count 67 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 67 transition count 124
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 67 transition count 121
Applied a total of 84 rules in 4 ms. Remains 67 /105 variables (removed 38) and now considering 121/202 (removed 81) transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:05:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 117 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 117 rows 67 cols
[2024-05-24 03:05:40] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-24 03:05:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 03:05:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 117 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:05:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:05:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 03:05:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 103 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 120 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:05:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 117 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:05:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:05:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/67 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 8/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:05:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:05:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:05:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 116/183 variables, 67/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:05:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 1/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/184 variables, 1/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/184 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 184/184 variables, and 82 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 3067 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 67/67 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/67 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 8/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 4/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 116/183 variables, 67/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 120/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 0/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/184 variables, 1/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/184 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 184/184 variables, and 202 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 3272 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 67/67 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 6374ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6377ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 67/105 places, 121/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6485 ms. Remains : 67/105 places, 121/202 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:05:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-24 03:05:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 03:05:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 121 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:05:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 03:05:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 03:05:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16222388483792265102.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 03:05:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10897777544894558588.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16222388483792265102.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10897777544894558588.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.59598e+06,0.317546,15552,2,2292,5,45095,6,0,382,58737,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((!(EF((!(EF((p7==1))) + (p79!=1)))) + !(((p55==0)||(p49==1)))) U !((((E(EG((p93==0)) U !(((p64==0)||(p29==1)))) * !(AG((p131==0)))) * E...316
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(Init,(!(E(TRUE U (!(E(TRUE U (p7==1))) + (p79!=1)))) + !(((p55==0)||(p49==1))))) * !(!((E(!((((!(EX(!(...1716
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t...465
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,12.1613,376552,1,0,677,2.24324e+06,292,354,2910,2.27937e+06,709
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2024-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 202/202 transitions.
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 69 transition count 134
Iterating global reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 69 transition count 134
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 64 transition count 123
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 64 transition count 123
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 87 place count 64 transition count 118
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 88 place count 63 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 63 transition count 116
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 63 transition count 113
Applied a total of 92 rules in 3 ms. Remains 63 /105 variables (removed 42) and now considering 113/202 (removed 89) transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:05:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 109 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 109 rows 63 cols
[2024-05-24 03:05:59] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-24 03:05:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 03:05:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 109 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:05:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:05:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 03:05:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 55 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 102 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 112 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:05:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 109 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:05:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:05:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/63 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 8/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:05:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:06:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:06:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:06:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 4/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 108/171 variables, 63/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/172 variables, 1/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/172 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 172/172 variables, and 78 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved in 2572 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 63/63 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 112/112 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/63 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 8/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 4/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 3/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 108/171 variables, 63/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 112/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/172 variables, 1/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/172 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 172/172 variables, and 193 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved in 3686 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 63/63 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 112/112 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 6294ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6296ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/105 places, 113/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6402 ms. Remains : 63/105 places, 113/202 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:06:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-24 03:06:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-24 03:06:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 113 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:06:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 03:06:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 03:06:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16820739775309539570.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 03:06:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4088410481339182980.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16820739775309539570.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4088410481339182980.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.9705e+06,0.103344,7584,2,1206,5,17115,6,0,359,18099,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(E(A(!(AX(((p40==0)||(p113==1)))) U (EX((p124==0)) * ((p70==0)||(p132==1)))) U ((!(EG((p25==1))) * !((((p151==1)||(p41==0))||(p121==1))...213
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(!((E(!((EX((p124==0)) * ((p70==0)||(p132==1)))) U (!(!(!(EX(!(((p40==0)||(p113==1))))))) * !((EX((p...369
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t...394
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,8.85904,293228,1,0,696,1.62396e+06,269,401,2657,1.94236e+06,665
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2024-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 202/202 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 138 edges and 105 vertex of which 10 / 105 are part of one of the 5 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 40 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 40 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 59 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 0 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 59 transition count 121
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 89 place count 51 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 51 transition count 104
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 51 transition count 96
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 108 place count 48 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 48 transition count 88
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 48 transition count 85
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 116 place count 46 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 46 transition count 81
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 46 transition count 75
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 5 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 5 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 46 transition count 70
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 44 transition count 68
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 42 transition count 66
Applied a total of 135 rules in 21 ms. Remains 42 /105 variables (removed 63) and now considering 66/202 (removed 136) transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:06:14] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 59 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 59 rows 42 cols
[2024-05-24 03:06:14] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-24 03:06:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 03:06:14] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 59 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:06:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:06:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 42 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 75 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-24 03:06:14] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 13 ms returned []
Running 50 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:06:14] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 59 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:06:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 8/42 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:06:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:06:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:06:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:06:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 58/100 variables, 42/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/100 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 100/101 variables, and 55 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved in 671 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 8/42 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 58/100 variables, 42/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 50/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/100 variables, 0/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 100/101 variables, and 105 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved in 687 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 1373ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1374ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 42/105 places, 66/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1489 ms. Remains : 42/105 places, 66/202 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:06:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 03:06:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 03:06:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 66 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:06:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 03:06:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 03:06:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10954752444014188662.gal : 12 ms
[2024-05-24 03:06:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14754403425938683985.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10954752444014188662.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14754403425938683985.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,203152,0.033959,4948,2,726,5,6248,6,0,223,6138,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(EF(EG(((p69==0)||(p34==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U EG(((p69==0)||(p34==1))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t10, t11, t13, t14, t27, t28, Intersection with reachabl...226
(forward)formula 0,1,0.92182,37136,1,0,257,206915,151,124,1617,210985,300
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2024-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 202/202 transitions.
Discarding 38 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 38 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 67 transition count 131
Iterating global reduction 0 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 67 transition count 131
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 82 place count 61 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 61 transition count 119
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 61 transition count 111
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 98 place count 59 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 59 transition count 105
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 102 place count 57 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 57 transition count 101
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 57 transition count 96
Applied a total of 109 rules in 10 ms. Remains 57 /105 variables (removed 48) and now considering 96/202 (removed 106) transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:06:17] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 93 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 57 cols
[2024-05-24 03:06:17] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 03:06:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 82 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 03:06:17] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 93 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:06:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:06:17] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 03:06:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 50 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 134 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 95 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:06:17] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 93 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:06:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:06:17] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/57 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:06:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 2/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:06:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:06:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 92/149 variables, 57/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/150 variables, 1/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/150 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 150/150 variables, and 74 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved in 2279 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 57/57 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 95/95 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/57 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 7/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:06:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 1/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 92/149 variables, 57/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 95/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/150 variables, 1/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/150 variables, 0/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 150/150 variables, and 170 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved in 2772 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 57/57 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 95/95 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints]
After SMT, in 5073ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5074ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 57/105 places, 96/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5220 ms. Remains : 57/105 places, 96/202 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:06:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 03:06:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 03:06:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 96 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:06:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 03:06:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 03:06:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6173527072103482980.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 03:06:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14553325618216709404.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6173527072103482980.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14553325618216709404.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.04248e+06,0.267169,15124,2,3482,5,49248,6,0,320,45703,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((E(EX(EX(EX(((p41==0)||(p77==1))))) U (((p136==0)||(p142==1))||(p33==1))) * AX(EG(EX((((p54==0)||(p90==1))||(p84==1)))))) * AG(((p98==0)...168
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(Init * !(E(EX(EX(EX(((p41==0)||(p77==1))))) U (((p136==0)||(p142==1))||(p33==1)))))] = FALSE * [(EY(Init) * ...266
(forward)formula 0,0,0.271905,15388,1,0,7,49248,9,2,331,45703,1
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2024-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 202/202 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 141 edges and 105 vertex of which 12 / 105 are part of one of the 6 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Discarding 40 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 40 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 59 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 0 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 59 transition count 121
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 89 place count 51 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 51 transition count 104
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 51 transition count 95
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 109 place count 48 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 48 transition count 87
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 48 transition count 84
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 117 place count 46 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 46 transition count 80
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 125 place count 46 transition count 74
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 6 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 6 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 46 transition count 68
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 42 transition count 64
Applied a total of 139 rules in 18 ms. Remains 42 /105 variables (removed 63) and now considering 64/202 (removed 138) transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:06:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 56 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 42 cols
[2024-05-24 03:06:22] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 03:06:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 03:06:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 56 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:06:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:06:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 03:06:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 41 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 73 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-24 03:06:22] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 14 ms returned []
Running 63 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:06:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 56 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:06:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:06:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/42 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:06:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:06:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:06:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 55/97 variables, 42/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 1/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/98 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 98/98 variables, and 55 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved in 896 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 42/42 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/42 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 55/97 variables, 42/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 63/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 1/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/98 variables, 0/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 98/98 variables, and 118 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved in 1106 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 42/42 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 2021ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2022ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 42/105 places, 64/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2131 ms. Remains : 42/105 places, 64/202 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:06:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 03:06:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 03:06:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 64 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:06:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 03:06:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 03:06:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5070615816026705776.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-24 03:06:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10691445365914142647.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5070615816026705776.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10691445365914142647.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,164273,0.027043,4136,2,455,5,3751,6,0,223,3056,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(EG((p61==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U EG((p61==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t10, t11, t13, t14, Intersection with reachable at each ...216
(forward)formula 0,0,0.138368,9416,1,0,147,32221,146,71,1613,26188,180
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2024-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 202/202 transitions.
Discarding 44 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 44 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 61 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 0 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 61 transition count 119
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 96 place count 53 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 53 transition count 102
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 53 transition count 93
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 116 place count 50 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 50 transition count 85
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 50 transition count 82
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 124 place count 48 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 48 transition count 78
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 48 transition count 72
Applied a total of 132 rules in 11 ms. Remains 48 /105 variables (removed 57) and now considering 72/202 (removed 130) transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:06:25] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 69 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 69 rows 48 cols
[2024-05-24 03:06:25] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 03:06:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 03:06:25] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 69 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:06:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:06:25] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 03:06:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 48 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 84 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 71 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:06:25] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 69 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:06:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:06:25] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/48 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:06:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:06:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 68/116 variables, 48/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/117 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/117 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 117/117 variables, and 60 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved in 1141 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 48/48 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/48 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:06:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 68/116 variables, 48/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 71/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/117 variables, 1/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/117 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 117/117 variables, and 132 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved in 1559 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 48/48 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 2724ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2724ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 48/105 places, 72/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2822 ms. Remains : 48/105 places, 72/202 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:06:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-24 03:06:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-24 03:06:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 72 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:06:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 03:06:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-24 03:06:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6234489943065310687.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-24 03:06:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11331478764900628018.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6234489943065310687.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11331478764900628018.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,369612,0.083862,7652,2,1847,5,20420,6,0,260,12895,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(TRUE)
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * TRUE)] != FALSE
(forward)formula 0,1,0.084764,7652,1,0,6,20420,7,1,349,12895,1
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2024-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 202/202 transitions.
Discarding 39 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 39 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 66 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 0 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 66 transition count 128
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 82 place count 62 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 62 transition count 120
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 62 transition count 114
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 93 place count 61 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 61 transition count 111
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 95 place count 60 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 60 transition count 109
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 60 transition count 106
Applied a total of 99 rules in 9 ms. Remains 60 /105 variables (removed 45) and now considering 106/202 (removed 96) transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:06:27] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 102 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 102 rows 60 cols
[2024-05-24 03:06:27] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-24 03:06:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
[2024-05-24 03:06:28] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 102 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:06:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:06:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-24 03:06:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 101 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 105 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:06:28] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 102 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2024-05-24 03:06:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-24 03:06:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 8/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:06:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:06:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:06:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:06:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 4/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:06:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 101/161 variables, 60/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/162 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
[2024-05-24 03:06:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-24 03:06:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 2/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/162 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 162/162 variables, and 78 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved in 2796 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 105/105 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 8/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 7/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 101/161 variables, 60/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 105/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 0/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/162 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/162 variables, 0/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 162/162 variables, and 183 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved in 2817 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 105/105 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 5649ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5651ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 60/105 places, 106/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5763 ms. Remains : 60/105 places, 106/202 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:06:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-24 03:06:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-24 03:06:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 106 transitions.
[2024-05-24 03:06:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 03:06:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-24 03:06:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9568408613753012148.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-24 03:06:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3048065303959725934.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9568408613753012148.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3048065303959725934.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.03616e+06,0.064482,5972,2,1469,5,10164,6,0,339,9565,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((AF(((((p1==0)&&(p97==0)) + EX((p132==1))) + AG(EX(((p63==0)||(p118==1)))))) + (EF((p135==1)) * ((p121==0)||(p152==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(EG(!(((((p1==0)&&(p97==0)) + EX((p132==1))) + !(E(TRUE U !(EX(((p63==0)||(p118==1)))))))))))] !=...236
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t...328
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,0.942123,36380,1,0,255,197386,238,129,2599,136267,300
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-08-CTLCardinality-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2024-05-24 03:06:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-24 03:06:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Total runtime 133491 ms.

BK_STOP 1716519994800

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="HealthRecord-PT-08"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is HealthRecord-PT-08, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r180-tall-171640604100753"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/HealthRecord-PT-08.tgz
mv HealthRecord-PT-08 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;